|
1
|
Davis JL and Ripley RT: Postgastrectomy
syndromes and nutritional considerations following gastric surgery.
Surg Clin North Am. 97:277–293. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
2
|
Bolton JS and Conway WC II:
Postgastrectomy syndromes. Surg Clin North Am. 91:1105–1122.
2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
3
|
Carvajal SH and Mulvihill SJ:
Postgastrectomy syndromes: Dumping and diarrhea. Gastroenterol Clin
North Am. 23:261–279. 1994.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4
|
Nakada K, Takahashi M, Ikeda M, Kinami S,
Yoshida M, Uenosono Y, Kawashima Y, Nakao S, Oshio A, Suzukamo Y,
et al: Factors affecting the quality of life of patients after
gastrectomy as assessed using the newly developed PGSAS-45 scale: A
nationwide multi-institutional study. World J Gastroenterol.
22:8978–8990. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
5
|
Kinami S, Takahashi M, Urushihara T, Ikeda
M, Yoshida M, Uenosono Y, Oshio A, Suzukamo Y, Terashima M, Kodera
Y and Nakada K: Background factors influencing postgastrectomy
syndromes after various types of gastrectomy. World J Clin Cases.
6:1111–1120. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
6
|
Nakada K, Ikeda M, Takahashi M, Kinami S,
Yoshida M, Uenosono Y, Kawashima Y, Oshio A, Suzukamo Y, Terashima
M and Kodera Y: Characteristics and clinical relevance of
postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale (PGSAS)-45: Newly
developed integrated questionnaires for assessment of living status
and quality of life in postgastrectomy patients. Gastric Cancer.
18:147–158. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
7
|
Terashima M, Tanabe K, Yoshida M, Kawahira
H, Inada T, Okabe H, Urushihara T, Kawashima Y, Fukushima N and
Nakada K: Postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale (PGSAS)-45 and
changes in body weight are useful tools for evaluation of
reconstruction methods following distal gastrectomy. Ann Surg
Oncol. 21 (Suppl 3):S370–S378. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
8
|
Ware JE, Kosinski M, Dewey JE and Gandek
B: How to score and interpret single-item health status measures: A
manual for users of the SF-8 health survey. Quality Metric Inc.,
Lincoln RI, 2001.
|
|
9
|
Fukuhara S and Suzukamo Y: Manual of the
SF-8 Japanese version (in Japanese). Institute for health outcomes
and process evaluation research, Kyoto, 2004.
|
|
10
|
Svedlund J, Sjödin I and Dotevall G:
GSRS-a clinical rating scale for gastrointestinal symptoms in
patients with irritable bowel syndrome and peptic ulcer disease.
Dig Dis Sci. 33:129–134. 1988.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
11
|
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association:
Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (ver. 5).
Kanehara Shuppan, Tokyo, 2018.
|
|
12
|
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association:
Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma 2017 (The 15th
edition). Kanehara Shuppan, Tokyo, 2018.
|
|
13
|
Kanda Y: Investigation of the freely
available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone
Marrow Transplant. 48:452–458. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
14
|
Kinami S, Nakamura N, Tomita Y, Miyata T,
Fujita H, Ueda N and Kosaka T: Precision surgical approach with
lymph-node dissection in early gastric cancer. World J
Gastroenterol. 25:1640–1652. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
15
|
Sasako M, Sakuramoto S, Katai H, Kinoshita
T, Furukawa H, Yamaguchi T, Nashimoto A, Fujii M, Nakajima T and
Ohashi Y: Five-year outcomes of a randomized phase III trial
comparing adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 versus surgery alone in
stage II or III gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 29:4387–4393.
2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
16
|
Rausei S, Mangano A, Galli F, Rovera F,
Boni L, Dionigi G and Dionigi R: Quality of life after gastrectomy
for cancer evaluated via the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-STO22
questionnaires: Surgical considerations from the analysis of 103
patients. Int J Surg. 11 (Suppl 1):S104–S109. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
17
|
Kundes MF, Kement M, Yegen F, Alkan M,
Kaya S and Kaptanoglu L: Effects of clinical factors on quality of
life following curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Niger J
Clin Pract. 22:661–668. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
18
|
Miwa K, Kinami S, Sato T, Fujimura T and
Miyazaki I: Vagus-saving D2 procedure for early gastric carcinoma.
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 97:286–290. 1996.PubMed/NCBI(In Japanese).
|
|
19
|
Kojima K, Yamada H, Inokuchi M, Kawano T
and Sugihara K: Functional evaluation after vagus-nerve-sparing
laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy. Surg Endosc.
22:2003–2008. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
20
|
Sugimachi K, Korenaga D, Tomikawa M, Ikeda
Y, Tsukamoto S, Kawasaki K, Yamamura S and Takenaka K: Factors
influencing the development of small intestinal obstruction
following gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.
Hepatogastroenterology. 55:496–499. 2008.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
21
|
Kinami S, Oonishi T, Fujita J, Tomita Y,
Funaki H, Fujita H, Nakano Y, Ueda N and Kosaka T: Optimal settings
and accuracy of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging for sentinel
node biopsy in early gastric cancer. Oncol Lett. 11:4055–4062.
2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
22
|
Kinami S, Funaki H, Fujita H, Nakano Y,
Ueda N and Kosaka T: Local resection of the stomach for gastric
cancer. Surg Today. 47:651–659. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
23
|
Takeuchi H, Goto O, Yahagi N and Kitagawa
Y: Function-preserving gastrectomy based on the sentinel node
concept in early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 20 (Suppl
1):S53–S59. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
24
|
Isozaki H, Matsumoto S, Murakami S, Takama
T, Sho T, Ishihara K, Sakai K, Takeda M, Nakada K and Fujiwara T:
Diminished gastric resection preserves better quality of life in
patients with early gastric cancer. Acta Med Okayama. 70:119–130.
2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
25
|
Kinami S and Kosaka T: Laparoscopic
sentinel node navigation surgery for early gastric cancer. Transl
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2(42)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
