|
1
|
Annual Report on the Aging Society: 2018
(Summary). Cabinet Office, Tokyo, 2018.
|
|
2
|
Gawande AA, Kwaan MR, Regenbogen SE,
Lipsitz SA and Zinner MJ: An apgar score for surgery. J Am Coll
Surg. 204:201–208. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
3
|
Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL, Zhou L,
Kmiecik TE, Ko CY and Cohen ME: Development and evaluation of the
universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: A decision aid and
informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg.
217:833–842. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
4
|
Szender JB, Frederick PJ, Eng KH, Akers
SN, Lele SB and Odunsi K: Evaluation of the national surgical
quality improvement program universal surgical risk calculator for
a gynecologic oncology service. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 25:512–520.
2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
5
|
Rivard C, Nahum R, Slagle E, Duininck M,
Vogel RI and Teoh D: Evaluation of the performance of the ACS NSQIP
surgical risk calculator in gynecologic oncology patients
undergoing laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol. 141:281–286. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
6
|
Pecorelli S: Revised FIGO staging for
carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol
Obstet. 105:103–104. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
7
|
Prat J: FIGO Committee on Gynecologic
Oncology. Staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian
tube, and peritoneum. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 124:1–5.
2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
8
|
Prat J: FIGO staging for uterine sarcomas.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 104:177–178. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
9
|
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL and
MacKenzie CR: A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in
longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J Chronic Dis.
40:373–383. 1987.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
10
|
Quan H, Li B, Couris CM, Fushimi K, Graham
P, Hider P, Januel JM and Sundararajan V: Updating and validating
the charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in
hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J
Epidemiol. 173:676–682. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
11
|
Kobayashi K, Imagama S, Ando K, Inagaki Y,
Suzuki Y, Nishida Y, Nagao Y and Ishiguro N: Analysis of falls that
caused serious events in hospitalized patients. Geriatr Gerontol
Int. 17:2403–2406. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
12
|
Katayama H, Kurokawa Y, Nakamura K, Ito H,
Kanemitsu Y, Masuda N, Tsubosa Y, Satoh T, Yokomizo A, Fukuda H and
Sasako M: Extended clavien-dindo classification of surgical
complications: Japan clinical oncology group postoperative
complications criteria. Surg Today. 46:668–685. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
13
|
Regenbogen SE, Ehrenfeld JM, Lipsitz SR,
Greenberg CC, Hutter MM and Gawande AA: Utility of the surgical
apgar score: Validation in 4119 patients. Arch Surg. 144:30–36.
2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
14
|
Zighelboim I, Kizer N, Taylor NP, Case AS,
Gao F, Thaker PH, Rader JS, Massad LS, Mutch DG and Powell MA:
‘Surgical Apgar Score’ predicts postoperative complications after
cytoreduction for advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol.
116:370–373. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
15
|
Clark RM, Lee MS, Rauh-Hain JA, Hall T,
Boruta DM, del Carmen MG, Goodman A, Schorge JO and Growdon WB:
Surgical apgar score and prediction of morbidity in women
undergoing hysterectomy for malignancy. Gynecol Oncol. 136:516–520.
2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
16
|
Kurata K, Chino Y, Shinagawa A, Kurokawa T
and Yoshida Y: Surgical apgar score predicts 30-day morbidity in
elderly patients who undergo non-laparoscopic gynecologic surgery:
A retrospective analysis. Int J Surg. 48:215–219. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
17
|
World Health Organization (WHO): World
Alliance for Patient Safety: forward programme 2008-2009, 1st
edition. WHO, Geneva, 2008. urihttps://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/70460simplehttps://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/70460.
Accessed June 25, 2008.
|
|
18
|
Park SH, Lee JY, Nam EJ, Kim S, Kim SW and
Kim YT: Prediction of perioperative complications after
robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer using the
modified surgical apgar score. BMC Cancer. 18(908)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
19
|
Uccella S, Bonzini M, Palomba S, Fanfani
F, Malzoni M, Ceccaroni M, Seracchioli R, Ferrero A, Berretta R,
Vizza E, et al: Laparoscopic vs. open treatment of endometrial
cancer in the elderly and very elderly: An age-stratified
multicenter study on 1606 women. Gynecol Oncol. 141:211–217.
2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
20
|
Berretta R, Merisio C, Melpignano M, Rolla
M, Ceccaroni M, DE Ioris A, Patrelli TS and Nardelli GB: Vaginal
versus abdominal hysterectomy in endometrial cancer: A
retrospective study in a selective population. Int J Gynecol
Cancer. 18:797–802. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
21
|
Goldman LS: Medical illness in patients
with schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry. 60 (Suppl 21):S10–S15.
1999.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
22
|
Liperoti R, Pedone C, Lapane KL, Mor V,
Bernabei R and Gambassi G: Venous thromboembolism among elderly
patients treated with atypical and conventional antipsychotic
agents. Arch Intern Med. 165:2677–2682. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
23
|
Parker C, Coupland C and Hippisley-Cox J:
Antipsychotic drugs and risk of venous thromboembolism: Nested
case-control study. BMJ. 341(c4245)2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
24
|
Daumit GL, Pronovost PJ, Anthony CB,
Guallar E, Steinwachs DM and Ford DE: Adverse events during medical
and surgical hospitalizations for persons with schizophrenia. Arch
Gen Psychiatry. 63:267–272. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
25
|
Tinquaut F, Freyer G, Chauvin F, Gane N,
Pujade-Lauraine E and Falandry C: Prognostic factors for overall
survival in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated
with chemotherapy: Results of a pooled analysis of three GINECO
phase II trials. Gynecol Oncol. 143:22–26. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
26
|
Ferrero A, Villa M, Tripodi E, Fuso L and
Menato G: Can vulnerable elders survey-13 predict the impact of
frailty on chemotherapy in elderly patients with gynaecological
malignancies? Medicine (Baltimore). 97(e12298)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
27
|
Suh DH, Kim JW, Kim HS, Chung HH, Park NH
and Song YS: Pre- and intra-operative variables associated with
surgical complications in elderly patients with gynecologic cancer:
The clinical value of comprehensive geriatric assessment. J Geriatr
Oncol. 5:315–322. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
28
|
Ahmed A, Deng W, Tew W, Bender D, Mannel
RS, Littell RD, DeNittis AS, Edelson M, Morgan M, Carlson J, et al:
Pre-Operative assessment and post-operative outcomes of elderly
women with gynecologic cancers, primary analysis of NRG CC-002: An
NRG oncology group/gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecol Oncol.
150:300–305. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
