Open Access

Comparison of a modified one‑piece mechanical and double‑layer hand‑sewn anastomosis in McKeown esophagogastrectomy: A single‑institute retrospective study

  • Authors:
    • Kunshou Zhu
    • Jiulong Zhang
    • Xiaohui Chen
    • Yujie Deng
    • Shaofeng Lin
    • Yibin Cai
    • Guibin Weng
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: May 12, 2021     https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2021.2296
  • Article Number: 134
  • Copyright: © Zhu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The present study aimed to introduce a novel method of cervical esophagogastric anastomosis, so‑called ‘modified one‑piece mechanical anastomosis’ (MOMA) in McKeown esophagogastrectomy and to compare its feasibility, efficacy and safety with those of ‘conventionally double‑layer hand‑sewn anastomosis’ (CDHA). Between March 2016 and March 2018, 80 consecutive patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing McKeown esophagogastrectomy with a curative intent were included in the present study. Among them, 40 received MOMA and the other 40 received CDHA. Their medical records, including operation time, anastomotic time, estimated blood loss, postoperative complications within 30 days, as well as survival rate, were retrospectively reviewed, analyzed and compared. Total operation time, anastomotic time and estimated blood loss in the MOMA group were significantly decreased compared with those in the CDHA group (207.73±2.66 vs. 225.40±3.43 min; 10.95±0.44 vs. 23.03±0.47 min; 144.50±21.14 vs. 241.75±23.75 ml; all P<0.01). Anastomotic leakage was present in 1 patient in the CDHA group, but no patients in the MOMA group (P=1.000). Anastomotic stenosis was documented in 4 and 2 patients in the MOMA and CDHA group, respectively (P=0.392). The 30‑day operative mortality was 0% and no significant difference was demonstrated in postoperative complications within groups (P>0.05). Furthermore, the disease‑free and overall survival was compared by means of Kaplan‑Meier survival estimates and log‑rank tests and no statistical difference was determined (P=0.5114 and P=0.7875, respectively). McKeown esophagogastrectomy with MOMA may be a feasible, effective and reproducible alternative with relatively satisfactory postoperative outcomes for the treatment of TE‑SCC, providing shorter operation and anastomosis times, and less estimated intraoperative blood loss.
View Figures
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

July-2021
Volume 15 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 2049-9450
Online ISSN:2049-9469

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Zhu K, Zhang J, Chen X, Deng Y, Lin S, Cai Y and Weng G: Comparison of a modified one‑piece mechanical and double‑layer hand‑sewn anastomosis in McKeown esophagogastrectomy: A single‑institute retrospective study. Mol Clin Oncol 15: 134, 2021
APA
Zhu, K., Zhang, J., Chen, X., Deng, Y., Lin, S., Cai, Y., & Weng, G. (2021). Comparison of a modified one‑piece mechanical and double‑layer hand‑sewn anastomosis in McKeown esophagogastrectomy: A single‑institute retrospective study. Molecular and Clinical Oncology, 15, 134. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2021.2296
MLA
Zhu, K., Zhang, J., Chen, X., Deng, Y., Lin, S., Cai, Y., Weng, G."Comparison of a modified one‑piece mechanical and double‑layer hand‑sewn anastomosis in McKeown esophagogastrectomy: A single‑institute retrospective study". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 15.1 (2021): 134.
Chicago
Zhu, K., Zhang, J., Chen, X., Deng, Y., Lin, S., Cai, Y., Weng, G."Comparison of a modified one‑piece mechanical and double‑layer hand‑sewn anastomosis in McKeown esophagogastrectomy: A single‑institute retrospective study". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 15, no. 1 (2021): 134. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2021.2296