Open Access

Multi‑drug‑resistance efflux in cisplatin‑naive and cisplatin‑exposed A2780 ovarian cancer cells responds differently to cell culture dimensionality

  • Authors:
    • Vasilij Koshkin
    • Mariana Bleker De Oliveira
    • Chun Peng
    • Laurie E. Ailles
    • Geoffrey Liu
    • Allan Covens
    • Sergey N. Krylov
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: June 14, 2021     https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2021.2323
  • Article Number: 161
  • Copyright: © Koshkin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

A primary reason for chemotherapy failure is chemoresistance, which is driven by various mechanisms. Multi‑drug resistance (MDR) is one such mechanism that is responsible for drug extrusion from the intracellular space. MDR can be intrinsic and thus, may pre‑exist the first application of chemotherapy. However, MDR may also be acquired during tumor exposure to chemotherapeutic agents. To understand whether cell clustering can influence intrinsic and acquired MDR, the present study assessed cultured monolayers (representing individual cells) and spheroids (representing clusters) formed by cisplatin‑naïve (intrinsic MDR) and cisplatin‑exposed (acquired MDR) lines of ovarian cancer A2780 cells by determining the cytometry of reaction rate constant (CRRC). MDR efflux was characterized using accurate and robust cell number vs. MDR efflux rate constant (kMDR) histograms. Both cisplatin‑naïve and cisplatin‑exposed monolayer cells presented unimodal histograms; the histogram of cisplatin‑exposed cells was shifted towards a higher kMDR value suggesting greater MDR activity. Spheroids of cisplatin‑naïve cells presented a bimodal histogram indicating the presence of two subpopulations with different MDR activity. In contrast, spheroids of cisplatin‑exposed cells presented a unimodal histogram qualitatively similar to that of the monolayers of cisplatin‑exposed cells but with a moderate shift towards greater MDR activity. A flow‑cytometry assessment of multidrug resistance‑associated protein 1 transporter levels in monolayers and dissociated spheroids revealed distributions similar to those of kMDR, thus, suggesting a plausible molecular mechanism for the observed differences in MDR activity. The observed greater effect of cell clustering on intrinsic rather than in acquired MDR can help guide the development of new therapeutic strategies targeting clusters of circulating tumor cells.
View Figures
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

August-2021
Volume 15 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 2049-9450
Online ISSN:2049-9469

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Koshkin V, De Oliveira MB, Peng C, Ailles LE, Liu G, Covens A and Krylov SN: Multi‑drug‑resistance efflux in cisplatin‑naive and cisplatin‑exposed A2780 ovarian cancer cells responds differently to cell culture dimensionality. Mol Clin Oncol 15: 161, 2021
APA
Koshkin, V., De Oliveira, M.B., Peng, C., Ailles, L.E., Liu, G., Covens, A., & Krylov, S.N. (2021). Multi‑drug‑resistance efflux in cisplatin‑naive and cisplatin‑exposed A2780 ovarian cancer cells responds differently to cell culture dimensionality. Molecular and Clinical Oncology, 15, 161. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2021.2323
MLA
Koshkin, V., De Oliveira, M. B., Peng, C., Ailles, L. E., Liu, G., Covens, A., Krylov, S. N."Multi‑drug‑resistance efflux in cisplatin‑naive and cisplatin‑exposed A2780 ovarian cancer cells responds differently to cell culture dimensionality". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 15.2 (2021): 161.
Chicago
Koshkin, V., De Oliveira, M. B., Peng, C., Ailles, L. E., Liu, G., Covens, A., Krylov, S. N."Multi‑drug‑resistance efflux in cisplatin‑naive and cisplatin‑exposed A2780 ovarian cancer cells responds differently to cell culture dimensionality". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 15, no. 2 (2021): 161. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2021.2323