|
1
|
Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C and Parkin DM: Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 127:2893–2917. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
2
|
Hori M, Matsuda T, Shibata A, Katanoda K, Sobue T and Nishimoto H: Japan Cancer Surveillance Research Group. Cancer incidence and incidence rates in Japan in 2009: A study of 32 population-based cancer registries for the monitoring of cancer incidence in Japan (MCIJ) project. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 45:884–891. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
3
|
Sasieni P and Adams J: Effect of screening on cervical cancer mortality in England and Wales: analysis of trends with an ageperiod cohort model. BMJ. 318:1244–1245. 1999.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
4
|
Baldauf JJ, Dreyfus M, Ritter J and Philippe E: An analysis of the factors involved in the diagnostic accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 76:468–473. 1997.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
5
|
Müller K, Soergel P, Hillemanns P and Jentschke M: Accuracy of colposcopically guided diagnostic methods for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 76:182–187. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
6
|
Fan A, Zhang L, Wang C, Wang Y, Han C and Xue F: Analysis of clinical factors correlated with the accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 296:965–972. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
7
|
Chappatte OA, Byrne DL, Raju KS, Nayagam M and Kenney A: Histological differences between colposcopic-directed biopsy and loop excision of the transformation zone (LETZ): A cause for concern. Gynecol Oncol. 43:46–50. 1991.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
8
|
Zhang X, Dou Y, Wang M, Li Y, Wang F, Xie X and Wang X: A retrospective analysis on 1901 women with high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by colposcopic biopsy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 217:53–58. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
9
|
Burger MP and Hollema H: The reliability of the histologic diagnosis in colposcopically directed biopsies. A plea for LETZ. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 3:385–390. 1993.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
10
|
Barker B, Garcia F, Lozevski J, Warner J and Hatch K: The correlation between colposcopically directed cervical biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure pathology and the effect of time on that agreement. Gynecol Oncol. 82:22–26. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
11
|
Zuchna C, Hager M, Tringler B, Georgoulopoulos A, Ciresa-Koenig A, Volgger B, Widschwendter A and Staudach A: Diagnostic accuracy of guided cervical biopsies: A prospective multicenter study comparing the histopathology of simultaneous biopsy and cone specimen. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 203:321.e1–e6. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
12
|
Kirkup W and Hill AS: The accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy in patients with suspected intraepithelial neoplasia of the cervix. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 87:1–4. 1980.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
13
|
Heatley MK and Bury JP: The correlation between the grade of dyskaryosis on cervical smear, grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on punch biopsy and the final histological diagnosis on cone biopsies of the cervix. Cytopathology. 9:93–99. 1998.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
14
|
Stubbe M, Broschewitz U, Kramm G, Schmidt W and Radtke A: Analysis of conizations performed 2005-2009 in Rostock. Geburtsh Frauenheilk. 71:187–193. 2011.
|
|
15
|
Duesing N, Schwarz J, Choschzick M, Jaenicke F, Gieseking F, Issa R, Mahner S and Woelber L: Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). Arch Gynecol Obstet. 286:1549–1554. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
16
|
Underwood M, Arbyn M, Parry-Smith W, De Bellis-Ayres S, Todd R, Redman CW and Moss EL: Accuracy of colposcopy-directed punch biopsies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 119:1293–1301. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
17
|
Benedet JL, Anderson GH and Boyes DA: Colposcopic accuracy in the diagnosis of microinvasive and occult invasive carcinoma of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol. 65:557–562. 1985.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
Stuebs FA, Schulmeyer CE, Mehlhorn G, Gass P, Kehl S, Renner SK, Renner SP, Geppert C, Adler W, Hartmann A, et al: Accuracy of colposcopy-directed biopsy in detecting early cervical neoplasia: A retrospective study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 299:525–532. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
19
|
Cheng X, Feng Y, Wang X, Wan X, Xie X and Lu W: The effectiveness of conization treatment for post-menopausal women with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Exp Ther Med. 5:185–188. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
20
|
Messiou C, Morgan VA, De Silva SS, Ind TE and deSouza NM: Diffusion weighted imaging of the uterus: Regional ADC variation with oral contraceptive usage and comparison with cervical cancer. Acta Radiol. 50:696–701. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
21
|
Mahon MM, Cox IJ, Dina R, Soutter WP, McIndoe GA, Williams AD and deSouza NM: (1)H magnetic resonance spectroscopy of preinvasive and invasive cervical cancer: In vivo-ex vivo profiles and effect of tumor load. J Magn Reson Imaging. 19:356–364. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
22
|
Charles-Edwards EM, Messiou C, Morgan VA, De Silva SS, McWhinney NA, Katesmark M, Attygalle AD and DeSouza NM: Diffusion-weighted imaging in cervical cancer with an endovaginal technique: Potential value for improving tumor detection in stage Ia and Ib1 disease. Radiology. 249:541–550. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
23
|
Patel-Lippmann K, Robbins JB, Barroilhet L, Anderson B, Sadowski EA and Boyum J: MR imaging of cervical cancer. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 25:635–649. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
24
|
Stoehr A, Nann D, Staebler A, Oberlechner E, Brucker SY and Bachmann C: Difficulties in diagnosis of a minimal deviation adenocarcinoma of uterine cervix diagnosed postoperatively: Brief communication and literature review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 300:1029–1043. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
