Open Access

Analysis of efficacy, safety and prognostic factors of DAC‑HAA treatment in Chinese pediatric patients with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia

  • Authors:
    • Liang Wang
    • Chun Li
    • Fang Xu
    • Fang Cao
    • Bo Zhang
    • Jing Wang
    • Shen Wang
    • Li Chen
    • Na Li
    • Chenglin Liao
    • Hongjun Liu
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: November 1, 2021     https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2021.2431
  • Article Number: 269
  • Copyright: © Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is generally considered as the only effective treatment for children with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Achieving remission prior to HSCT affects the efficacy of the procedure and patient survival; therefore, induction therapy in children with R/R AML prior to HSCT is very important. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy, prognosis and safety of 5‑aza‑2‑deoxycytidine (DAC) combined with homoharringtonine + cytarabine + aclarubicin (HAA regimen) in the treatment of pediatric R/R AML. A total of 53 pediatric patients with R/R AML, aged 1‑14 years, were treated with DAC‑HAA. The overall response rate was 83.1%, with a complete remission rate of 77.4% and a partial remission rate of 5.7%. In conclusion, DAC‑HAA therapy for children with R/R AML was found to be associated with a high remission rate, a short period of bone marrow suppression and a good safety profile. Therefore, DAC‑HAA may be of value as a transitional regimen prior to HSCT and is worthy of clinical consideration.

Introduction

Although significant advances in chemotherapy for childhood acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have been made in recent years, 50-70% of all pediatric patients relapse after achieving the first complete remission (CR) (1-4). In addition, the long-term disease-free survival rate is only ~40% (5). It is generally believed that hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is currently the only effective treatment for pediatric relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML (6). However, whether the patient has achieved remission prior to the transplantation procedure markedly affects the efficacy of the treatment and patient survival after transplantation; therefore, induction therapy prior to HSCT is very important for pediatric patients with R/R AML.

The clinical CR rate of treatment with homoharringtonine (HHT) + cytarabine (Ara-C) + aclarubicin (Acla) (HAA regimen) in adults with R/R AML has been previously reported to be as high as 80% (7). Therefore, the present retrospective study was conducted to investigate whether treatment with HAA combined with 5-aza-2-deoxycytidine (DAC) can improve the clinical remission rate in pediatric patients with R/R AML.

Patients and methods

Patients

To retrospectively evaluate the clinical efficacy, prognosis and safety of DAC combined with HAA in the treatment of R/R AML in pediatric patients, a total of 53 children with R/R AML (except M3 type) admitted to the Department of Hematology of Anhui Provincial Cancer Hospital (Hefei, China) between May 2010 and May 2020 were included in the present study. All patients were diagnosed based on the morphology, immunophenotype, cytogenetics and molecular biology classification criteria (8). All parents/legal guardians of the patients provided written informed consent forms, and the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Anhui Provincial Cancer Hospital (no. 2021-EXK-02) and complied with the ethical guidelines outlined in the 1975 Helsinki Declaration. The standard of relapse was defined as follows: After CR, leukemic cells reappearing in the peripheral blood, or >5.0% blast cells in the bone marrow (after excluding other reasons, such as bone marrow regeneration after consolidation chemotherapy), or extramedullary leukemic cell infiltration.

Treatment

All patients were treated with DAC-HAA according to disease conditions and the patients' compliance. The detailed DAC-HAA regimen was as follows: DAC (20 mg/m2, qd, days 1-3), HHT (2 mg/m2, qd, days 4-10), Ara-C (100 mg/m2, q12h, days 4-10) and Acla (12 mg/m2, qd, days 4-10).

Statistical analysis

Fisher's exact test was used to detect the factors that influenced the CR rate. Kaplan Meier curve analysis was used to detect the factors that influenced the overall survival rate. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software, version 19 (SPSS, Inc.). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Patient characteristics

The characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table I. A total of 53 patients were enrolled in the present study, including 23 female and 30 male patients. The median age of the patients was 7 years (range, 1-14 years). A total of 15 patients were diagnosed with relapsed AML, and 38 patients were diagnosed with refractory AML. According to the WHO classification (8), 6 patients had a diagnosis of M1, 23 patients had a diagnosis of M2, 4 patients had a diagnosis of M4, 13 patients had a diagnosis of M5, 2 patients had a diagnosis of M6, and 5 patients had a diagnosis of M7. A total of 2 patients had FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication mutations, 16 patients had t(8:21) mutations, 16 patients had AML1-ETO mutations, and 2 patients had mixed lineage leukemia-AF9 mutations. Furthermore, 42 of these patients had undergone HSCT.

Table I

Patient characteristics (n=53).

Table I

Patient characteristics (n=53).

CharacteristicsNo.
Sex (male/female)30/23
Median age, years (range)7 (1-14)
WHO classification subtype 
     M16
     M223
     M30
     M44
     M513
     M62
     M75
Genetic anomaly at initial diagnosis 
     Normal karyotype without any molecular abnormality10
     FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication2
     t(8:21)16
     AML1-ETO16
     Mixed lineage leukemia-AF92
Disease status 
     Relapsed15
     Refractory38
White blood cell count, x109/l 
     <1013
     ≥1040
Platelet count, x109/l 
     ≤5031
     >5022
Hemoglobin concentration, g/l 
     ≤10033
     >10020
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation 
     Yes42
     No11
Response and treatment outcome

A total of 41/53 patients (77.4%) achieved CR after the first course of induction treatment, and PR was observed in 3 patients (5.7%), with an overall response rate of 83.1%. Patients were divided into different subgroups to analyze the association of CR with various factors. As shown in Table II, t(8:21) had a slight favorable effect on CR rate, as patients with t(8:21) had a CR rate of 88 vs. 73% in patients without this mutation. The analysis demonstrated that age, sex, white blood cell count, platelet count, hemoglobin concentration and disease status exerted no significant effect on CR rate. Clinically, the prognosis of patients with refractory AML is often worse compared with that of patients with recurrent AML (9). The present study demonstrated that the CR rate of refractory patients is similar to that of recurrent patients, indicating that DAC-HAA also has an excellent therapeutic effect in patients with refractory disease. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis of the factors that influenced overall survival indicated that t(8:21) and HSCT had a positive impact on survival. On the other hand, sex, age, and disease status did not significantly affect survival (Fig. 1).

Table II

CR analysis.

Table II

CR analysis.

CharacteristicsCR/total, nCR rate (%)P-value
Sex  0.323
     Male22/3073 
     Female19/2383 
Age, years  0.542
     <512/1580 
     ≥529/3876 
WHO classification subtype   
     M1-M427/33820.253
     M5-M714/2070 
Genetic anomaly at initial diagnosis  0.215
     t(8:21)14/1688 
     Normal27/3773 
White blood cell count, x109/l  0.619
     <1010/1377 
     ≥1031/4078 
Platelet count, x109/l  0.362
     ≤5025/3181 
     >5016/2273 
Hemoglobin concentration, g/l  0.499
     ≤10025/3376 
     >10016/2080 
Disease status  0.542
     Relapsed12/1580 
     Refractory29/3876 

[i] CR, complete remission.

Toxicity

Bone marrow suppression was evident in all children after chemotherapy. The mean time between the end of chemotherapy and the beginning of bone marrow hematopoiesis (neutrophil count ≥0.5x109/l) was 18.8±4.32 days; during the period from the end of chemotherapy until the neutrophil count reached ≥0.5x109/l, the patients received red blood cell and platelet transfusions. The ratio of red blood cell and platelet volume to body weight was 19.02±5.81 ml/kg and 0.156±0.065 U/kg, respectively.

A total of 11 patients in this study developed grade 4 bone marrow suppression after treatment. The median time for granulocyte recovery (neutrophil count 0.5x109/l) in 4 patients with CR was 14 days (range, 7-25 days), and the median time for platelet recovery (platelet count 20x109/l) was 23 days (range, 7-37 days). Fever occurred in 11 patients during granulocytopenia, including pulmonary infection in 5 patients, septicemia in 4 patients, skin and soft tissue infection in 1 patient, herpes zoster infection in 1 patient and acute otitis media in 1 patient. In 1 patient, pulmonary infection combined with alveolar hemorrhage resulted in a fatal outcome following failure of anti-infection treatment, while the symptoms in the remaining patients disappeared after successful anti-infection treatment.

Idarubicin (IDA) combined with high-dose Ara-C (IA) and HHT are known to be associated with cardiotoxicity (10). Therefore, all patients in the present study also received cardioprotective treatment with vitamin C and coenzyme Q10 at the same time as chemotherapy. No obvious cardiotoxicity was found during or after chemotherapy, and no obvious abnormalities were observed in the electrocardiogram. A total of 66.0% of the patients developed infections of different severity, mainly manifesting as pneumonia (80%), of which 67.9% of the cases were caused by bacteria, 17.8% were caused by fungi and 14.3% had a mixed etiology.

Other non-hematological adverse reactions included nausea (n=10; 19%), vomiting (n=14; 26%), diarrhea (n=7; 13%), mucositis (n=4; 7%) and constipation (n=14; 26%), which improved with symptomatic treatment. A total of 4 patients developed reversible liver function abnormalities during chemotherapy, and no patient developed kidney damage.

Discussion

Children with R/R AML have poor outcome and unfavorable response to chemotherapy, whereas the currently accepted radical therapy is HSCT (11). Whether the proportion of blasts in the bone marrow of the patient is <5% prior to transplantation plays a key role in the efficacy of transplantation and long-term survival; however, most conventional chemotherapy regimens cannot achieve bone marrow remission in children with R/R AML. Effective chemotherapy regimens mainly include the following: High-dose Ara-C, mitoxantrone + etoposide + Ara-C (MEC), fludarabine + Ara-C + granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) + IDA (FLAG-IDA) and Ara-C + aclarubicin + G-CSF (CAG), among others (12-14). The response rate with high-dose Ara-C chemotherapy is ~20% in R/R AML (15). The CR rate with FLAG-Ida is 52.1% (16). MEC is also occasionally used as the primary regimen in patients with R/R-AML, with CR rates of 18-66% (17).

In China, the treatment of children with R/R AML mostly includes IA, CAG or FLAG. Daunorubicin is an antitumor drug, which can inhibit the synthesis of RNA and DNA, has a wide antitumor spectrum and is mainly suitable for AML (18). The methoxy group is removed from the C4 position of the daunorubicin glycosidic group to form IDA. The structural change increases the lipophilicity of IDA, making it easier for the drug to penetrate cell membranes. In cells, IDA is metabolized to alcohol 4-demethoxydaunorubicin (IDAol). Compared with IDA, IDAol has the same antitumor activity with a markedly longer clearance time from the body, and it can penetrate through the blood-brain barrier and placenta. Compared to other anthracycline drugs, IDA has higher antitumor activity and can effectively reduce tumor recurrence rates (19-21). The application of IA chemotherapy in children with R/R AML is associated with a higher rate of bone marrow remission (22). However, when our team applied the IA regimen in the clinical setting, the total remission rate was found to be suboptimal, with a long bone marrow suppression period, high infection rate (100%) and high infection-related mortality rate.

In recent years, it has been found that abnormal DNA methylation plays an important role in the occurrence and development of AML. Demethylating agents, such as DAC and azacitidine, have been used in the treatment of adult R/R AML with good clinical efficacy (23-26). DAC is a highly effective inhibitor of DNA methyltransferase interfering with DNA methylation, which can reverse the DNA methylation process and activate silent tumor suppressor genes to inhibit the proliferation of tumor cells (27). Qin et al (28) found that, when combined with Ara-C, DAC can enhance its cytotoxicity. HHT is an alkaloid antitumor drug extracted from the Cephalotaxus plant (29), and is able to inhibit the synthesis of DNA and protein in tumor cells with no cross-resistance with Ara-C. In addition, Zhou et al (30) reported that HHT and Ara-C also exert a synergistic effect; in particular, HHT combined with Acla and Ara-C (DAC-HAA) was able to achieve a high remission rate in adult R/R AML in previous reports (31,32).

To the best of our knowledge, there are yet no reports of this method applied as clinical treatment of children with R/R AML. The present study was undertaken to explore the efficacy, safety and prognostic factors of DAC-HAA treatment in Chinese pediatric patients with R/R AML. The results demonstrated that DAC-HAA achieved higher bone marrow remission rate, shorter bone marrow suppression period and higher disease-free survival rate, compared with DAC or HAA alone.

However, due to the small number of patients in the present study, and due to the fact that there were only 3 cases of patients with partial remission, it is impossible to systematically analyze the factors that may affect partial remission, which is a limitation of the present study. We hope that there will be a larger sample of clinical studies in the future, which enable the evaluation of the clinical efficacy of DAC-HAA in a more systematic and comprehensive manner.

In summary, the present results suggest that the DAC-HAA chemotherapy regimen is associated with a high bone marrow remission rate and a good safety profile in the treatment of pediatric patients with R/R AML, it may represent a good bridging treatment for HSCT, and is worthy of clinical consideration.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The present study was supported by the Wu Jieping Medical Foundation (grant no. 320.6750.18391).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

Funding acquisition: LW; investigation: LW; resources: LW, BZ, CLiao; data curation: LW, FX, FC, SW, LC, NL; formal analysis: CLi; methodology: HL, CLi; project administration: HL, CLi; writing-review and editing: JW; supervision: HL. HL and CLi confirm the authenticity of the raw data. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All parents/legal guardians of the patients provided written informed consent forms, and the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Anhui Provincial Cancer Hospital (no. 2021-EXK-02) and complied with the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Helsinki Declaration.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Radhakrishnan V, Thampy C, Ganesan P, Rajendranath R, Ganesan TS, Rajalekshmy KR and Sagar TG: Acute myeloid leukemia in children: Experience from Tertiary cancer Centre in India. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 32:257–261. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Kulkarni KP and Marwaha RK: Childhood acute myeloid leukemia: An Indian perspective. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 28:257–268. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Kavcic M, Fisher BT, Li Y, Seif AE, Torp K, Walker DM, Huang YS, Lee GE, Tasian SK, Vujkovic M, et al: Induction mortality and resource utilization in children treated for acute myeloid leukemia at free-standing pediatric hospitals in the United States. Cancer. 119:1916–1923. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Taga T, Tomizawa D, Takahashi H and Adachi S: Acute myeloid leukemia in children: Current status and future directions. Pediatr Int. 58:71–80. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Tomizawa D, Tabuchi K, Kinoshita A, Hanada R, Kigasawa H, Tsukimoto I and Tsuchida M: Tokyo Children's Cancer Study Group. Repetitive cycles of high-dose cytarabine are effective for childhood acute myeloid leukemia: Long-term outcome of the children with AML treated on two consecutive trials of Tokyo Children's Cancer Study Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 49:127–132. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Okamoto Y, Kudo K, Tabuchi K, Tomizawa D, Taga T, Goto H, Yabe H, Nakazawa Y, Koh K, Ikegame K, et al: Hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in children with refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Bone Marrow Transplant. 54:1489–1498. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Bose P, Vachhani P and Cortes JE: Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 18(17)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Vardiman JW, Harris NL and Brunning RD: The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of the myeloid neoplasms. Blood. 100:2292–2302. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Thol F, Schlenk RF, Heuser M and Ganser A: How I treat refractory and early relapsed acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 126:319–327. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Bezwoda WR and Dansey RD: Idarubicin plus Cytarabine versus doxorubicin plus cytarabine in induction therapy for acute non-lymphoid leukaemia: A randomized trial. Leuk Lymphoma. 1:221–225. 1990.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Sander A, Zimmermann M, Dworzak M, Fleischhack G, von Neuhoff C, Reinhardt D, Kaspers GJ and Creutzig U: Consequent and intensified relapse therapy improved survival in pediatric AML: Results of relapse treatment in 379 patients of three consecutive AML-BFM trials. Leukemia. 24:1422–1428. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Chen F, Wang J, Hou M, Zhao H, Yang E, Ran X, Wang M, Yu W, Xu R, Wang Z, et al: Prospective multicentre study of chemotherapeutic regimen containing pirarubicin on the treatment of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia in adults. Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 35:388–392. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (In Chinese).

13 

Liedtke M, Dunn T, Dinner S, Coutré SE, Berube C, Gotlib J, Patel S and Medeiros B: Salvage therapy with mitoxantrone, etoposide and cytarabine in relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leuk Res. 38:1441–1445. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Jackson G, Taylor P, Smith GM, Marcus R, Smith A, Chu P, Littlewood TJ, Duncombe A, Hutchinson M, Mehta AB, et al: Amulticentre, open, Non comparative phase II study of a combination of fludarabine phosphate, cytarabine and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia and de novo refractory anemia with excess of blasts in transformation. Br J Hematol. 112:127–137. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Zeidner JF, Vincent BG, Esparza S, Ivanova A, Moore DT, Foster MC, Coombs CC, Jamieson K, Van Deventer HW, Blanchard L, et al: Final clinical results of a phase II study of high dose cytarabine followed by pembrolizumab in relapsed/refractory AML. Blood. 134 (Suppl 1)(S831)2019.

16 

Pastore D, Specchia G, Carluccio P, Liso A, Mestice A, Rizzi R, Greco G, Buquicchio C and Liso V: FLAG-IDA in the treatment of refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: Single-center experience. Ann Hematol. 82:231–235. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Ruan M, Liu LP, Zhang AL, Quan Qi B, Liu F, Liu TF, Liu XM, Chen XJ, Yang WY, Guo Y, et al: Improved outcome of children with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia by addition of cladribine to re-induction chemotherapy. Cancer Med. 10:956–964. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Luskin MR, Lee JW, Fernandez HF, Abdel-Wahab O, Bennett JM, Ketterling RP, Lazarus HM, Levine RL, Litzow MR, Paietta EM, et al: Benefit of high-dose daunorubicin in AML induction extends across cytogenetic and molecular groups. Blood. 127:1551–1558. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Bozoglan H, Ergene U and Yoleri L: Use of cytarabine and idarubicin in a newly diagnosed AML patient with a severe wound. Transfus Apher Sci. 45:17–20. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Ziogas DC, Voulgarelis M and Zintzaras E: A Network Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of induction treatments in acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly. Clin Ther. 33:254–279. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Mandelli F, Vignetti M, Suciu S, Stasi R, Petti MC, Meloni G, Muus P, Marmont F, Marie JP, Labar B, et al: Daunorubicin versus mitoxantrone versus idarubicin as induction and consolidation chemotherapy for adults with acute myeloid leukemia: The EORTC and GIMEMA Groups Study AML-10. J Clin Oncol. 27:5397–5403. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Murphy T and Yee KWL: Cytarabine and daunorubicin for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 18:1765–1780. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Fenaux P, Mufti GJ, Hellström-Lindberg E, Santini V, Gattermann N, Germing U, Sanz G, List AF, Gore S, Seymour JF, et al: Azacitidine prolongs overall survival compared with conventional care regimens in elderly patients with low bone marrow blast count acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 28:562–569. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Lübbert M, Rüter BH, Claus R, Schmoor C, Schmid M, Germing U, Kuendgen A, Rethwisch V, Ganser A, Platzbecker U, et al: A multicenter phase II trial of decitabine as first-line treatment for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia judged unfit for induction chemotherapy. Hematologica. 97:393–401. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Ritchie EK, Feldman EJ, Christos PJ, Rohan SD, Lagassa CB, Ippoliti C, Scandura JM, Carlson K and Roboz GJ: Decitabine in patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 54:2003–2007. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Tawfik B, Sliesoraitis S, Lyerly S, Klepin HD, Lawrence J, Isom S, Ellis LR, Manuel M, Dralle S, Berenzon D, et al: Efficacy of the hypomethylating agents as frontline, salvage, or consolidation therapy in adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Ann Hematol. 93:47–55. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Herman JG and BayIin SB: Gene silencing in cancer in association with promoter hyper methylation. N Engl J Med. 349:2042–2054. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Qin T, Youssef EM, Jelinek J, Chen R, Yang AS, Garcia-Manero G and Issa JP: Effect of cytarabine and decitabine in combination in human leukemic cell lines. Clin Cancer Res. 13:4225–4232. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Huang MT: Harringtonine, an inhibitor of initiation of protein biosynthesis. Mol Pharmacol. 11:511–519. 1975.PubMed/NCBI

30 

Zhou DC, Zittoun R and Marie JP: Homoharringtonine: An effective new natural product in cancer chemotherapy. Bull Cancer. 82:987–995. 1995.PubMed/NCBI

31 

Bose P, Verstovsek S, Gasior Y, Jain N, Jabbour EJ, Estrov Z, Alvarado Y, DiNardo CD, Pemmaraju N, Kornblau SM, et al: Phase I/II study of Ruxolitinib (RUX) with decitabine (DAC) in patients with post-myeloproliferative neoplasm acute myeloid leukemia (post-MPN AML): Phase I results. Blood. 128(4262)2016.

32 

Zhu HH, Jiang H, Jiang Q, Jia JS, Qin YZ and Huang XJ: Homoharringtonine, aclarubicin and cytarabine (HAA) regimen as the first course of induction therapy is highly effective for acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21). Leuk Res. 44:40–44. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

December-2021
Volume 15 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 2049-9450
Online ISSN:2049-9469

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Wang L, Li C, Xu F, Cao F, Zhang B, Wang J, Wang S, Chen L, Li N, Liao C, Liao C, et al: Analysis of efficacy, safety and prognostic factors of DAC‑HAA treatment in Chinese pediatric patients with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia. Mol Clin Oncol 15: 269, 2021
APA
Wang, L., Li, C., Xu, F., Cao, F., Zhang, B., Wang, J. ... Liu, H. (2021). Analysis of efficacy, safety and prognostic factors of DAC‑HAA treatment in Chinese pediatric patients with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia. Molecular and Clinical Oncology, 15, 269. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2021.2431
MLA
Wang, L., Li, C., Xu, F., Cao, F., Zhang, B., Wang, J., Wang, S., Chen, L., Li, N., Liao, C., Liu, H."Analysis of efficacy, safety and prognostic factors of DAC‑HAA treatment in Chinese pediatric patients with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 15.6 (2021): 269.
Chicago
Wang, L., Li, C., Xu, F., Cao, F., Zhang, B., Wang, J., Wang, S., Chen, L., Li, N., Liao, C., Liu, H."Analysis of efficacy, safety and prognostic factors of DAC‑HAA treatment in Chinese pediatric patients with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 15, no. 6 (2021): 269. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2021.2431