Successful tepotinib treatment of adenocarcinoma with MET exon 14 skipping and discordant results between Oncomine Dx target test and ArcherMET: A case report

  • Authors:
    • Yoko Onodera
    • Akimasa Sekine
    • Eri Hagiwara
    • Sho Yamada
    • Satoshi Ikeda
    • Erina Tabata
    • Hideya Kitamura
    • Tomohisa Baba
    • Shigeru Komatsu
    • Koji Okudela
    • Takashi Ogura
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: May 9, 2023     https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2023.2645
  • Article Number: 49
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Patients with non‑small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are often positive for oncogenic driver mutations, such as EGFR, ALK, BRAF, RET and MET exon 14 skipping mutations (METex14 skipping). Recently, METex14 skipping has become a functional biomarker for NSCLC with the approval of MET kinase inhibitors. Tepotinib is an oral MET kinase inhibitor. Its overall response rate is 46%, and the median duration of the response is 11.1 months. In Japan, companion diagnostics for tepotinib are limited with the ArcherMET and AmoyDx test, but not with Oncomine Dx target test. The present study reports the case of a 60‑year‑old male patient with lung adenocarcinoma harboring METex14 skipping, which was positive on Oncomine DxTT, but not on ArcherMET. In his sample used for Oncomine DxTT, the read count of MET(13)‑MET(15) products was only 46. He was treated with various chemotherapeutic agents, but developed cardiac tamponade due to the progression of the disease of mediastinal lymph node metastases. Tepotinib was administered following pericardial drainage, resulting in an immediate response in all lesions. The majority of the discordant samples between Oncomine DxTT and ArcherMET had read counts <800, and the patient described herein had only 46. Therefore, the results of the present study indicate that the use of tepotinib should be considered even in patients whose METex14 skipping results were negative with ArcherMET, yet positive on Oncomine DxTT, particularly relatively with low lead counts.
View Figures
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

June-2023
Volume 18 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 2049-9450
Online ISSN:2049-9469

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Onodera Y, Sekine A, Hagiwara E, Yamada S, Ikeda S, Tabata E, Kitamura H, Baba T, Komatsu S, Okudela K, Okudela K, et al: Successful tepotinib treatment of adenocarcinoma with MET exon 14 skipping and discordant results between Oncomine Dx target test and ArcherMET: A case report. Mol Clin Oncol 18: 49, 2023
APA
Onodera, Y., Sekine, A., Hagiwara, E., Yamada, S., Ikeda, S., Tabata, E. ... Ogura, T. (2023). Successful tepotinib treatment of adenocarcinoma with MET exon 14 skipping and discordant results between Oncomine Dx target test and ArcherMET: A case report. Molecular and Clinical Oncology, 18, 49. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2023.2645
MLA
Onodera, Y., Sekine, A., Hagiwara, E., Yamada, S., Ikeda, S., Tabata, E., Kitamura, H., Baba, T., Komatsu, S., Okudela, K., Ogura, T."Successful tepotinib treatment of adenocarcinoma with MET exon 14 skipping and discordant results between Oncomine Dx target test and ArcherMET: A case report". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 18.6 (2023): 49.
Chicago
Onodera, Y., Sekine, A., Hagiwara, E., Yamada, S., Ikeda, S., Tabata, E., Kitamura, H., Baba, T., Komatsu, S., Okudela, K., Ogura, T."Successful tepotinib treatment of adenocarcinoma with MET exon 14 skipping and discordant results between Oncomine Dx target test and ArcherMET: A case report". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 18, no. 6 (2023): 49. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2023.2645