|
1
|
Ostör AG: Natural history of cervical
intraepithelial neoplasia: A critical review. Int J Gynecol Pathol.
12:186–192. 1993.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
2
|
Santesso N, Mustafa RA, Wiercioch W, Kehar
R, Gandhi S, Chen Y, Cheung A, Hopkins J, Khatib R, Ma B, et al:
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of benefits and harms of
cryotherapy, LEEP, and cold knife conization to treat cervical
intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 132:266–271.
2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
3
|
Tanaka Y, Ueda Y, Kakuda M, Kubota S,
Matsuzaki S, Iwamiya T, Okazawa A, Matsuzaki S, Hashimoto K,
Kobayashi E, et al: Predictors for recurrent/persistent high-grade
intraepithelial lesions and cervical stenosis after therapeutic
conization: A retrospective analysis of 522 cases. Int J Clin
Oncol. 22:921–926. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
4
|
Ikeda M, Mikami M, Yasaka M, Enomoto T,
Kobayashi Y, Nagase S, Yokoyama M and Katabuchi H: Association of
menopause, aging and treatment procedures with positive margins
after therapeutic cervical conization for CIN 3: A retrospective
study of 8,856 patients by the Japan Society of Obstetrics and
Gynecology. J Gynecol Oncol. 32(e68)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
5
|
Matsumura M, Ota T, Takeshima N and
Takizawa K: Shimodaira-Taniguchi conization method: Its utility and
reliability. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 20:1025–1030. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
6
|
Miyoshi Y, Miyatake T, Ueda Y, Morimoto A,
Yokoyama T, Matsuzaki S, Kimura T, Yoshino K, Fujita M, Ohashi H,
et al: Prediction, based on resection margins, of long-term outcome
of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 treated by
Shimodaira-Taniguchi conization. Arch Gynecol Obstet.
285:1427–1432. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
7
|
Kigure K, Nakamura K, Kitahara Y, Nakao K,
Hirakawa T, Rokukawa S, Ito M, Nishimura T, Ito I, Kagami I and
Itoga S: An electrical scalpel conization versus
Shimodaira-Taniguchi conization procedure for cervical
intraepithelial neoplasia. Medicine (Baltimore).
97(e12640)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
8
|
Kirkwood BR and Sterne JAC: Essential
medical statistics. 2nd edition. Blackwell, Oxford, pp168-169,
2003.
|
|
9
|
Kanda Y: Investigation of the freely
available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone
Marrow Transplant. 48:452–458. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
10
|
Kobayashi Y: Conization. Comprehensive
Gynecology and Obstetrics. In: Surgery for Gynecologic Cancer.
Mikami M (ed). Springer, pp43-54, 2019.
|
|
11
|
Hasegawa K, Torii Y, Kato R, Udagawa Y and
Fukasawa I: The problems of cervical conization for postmenopausal
patients. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 37:327–331. 2016.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
12
|
Bae HS, Chung YW, Kim T, Lee KW and Song
JY: The appropriate cone depth to avoid endocervical margin
involvement is dependent on age and disease severity. Acta Obstet
Gynecol Scand. 92:185–192. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
13
|
Bogani G, DI Donato V, Sopracordevole F,
Ciavattini A, Ghelardi A, Lopez S, Simoncini T, Plotti F, Casarin
J, Serati M, et al: Recurrence rate after loop electrosurgical
excision procedure (LEEP) and laser Conization: A 5-year follow-up
study. Gynecol Oncol. 159:636–641. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
14
|
Reich O, Pickel H, Lahousen M, Tamussino K
and Winter R: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III: Long-term
outcome after cold-knife conization with clear margins. Obstet
Gynecol. 97:428–430. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
15
|
Reich O, Lahousen M, Pickel H, Tamussino K
and Winter R: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III: Long-term
follow-up after cold-knife conization with involved margins. Obstet
Gynecol. 99:193–196. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
16
|
Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of
Japan: Vital Statistics of Japan, 2019. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/database/db-hw/dl/81-1a2en.pdf.
Accessed January 22, 2023.
|
|
17
|
Sasieni P, Castanon A, Landy R, Kyrgiou M,
Kitchener H, Quigley M, Poon L, Shennan A, Hollingworth A, Soutter
WP, et al: Risk of preterm birth following surgical treatment for
cervical disease: Executive summary of a recent symposium. BJOG.
123:1426–1429. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
18
|
Himes KP and Simhan HN: Time from cervical
conization to pregnancy and preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 109 (2
Pt 1):314–319. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
19
|
Heinonen A, Gissler M, Riska A, Paavonen
J, Tapper AM and Jakobsson M: Loop electrosurgical excision
procedure and the risk for preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol.
121:1063–1068. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
20
|
Conner SN, Cahill AG, Tuuli MG, Stamilio
DM, Odibo AO, Roehl KA and Macones GA: Interval from loop
electrosurgical excision procedure to pregnancy and pregnancy
outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 122:1154–1159. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
21
|
Noehr B, Jensen A, Frederiksen K, Tabor A
and Kjaer SK: Depth of cervical cone removed by loop
electrosurgical excision procedure and subsequent risk of
spontaneous preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 114:1232–1238.
2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
22
|
Bevis KS and Biggio JR: Cervical
conization and the risk of preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
205:19–27. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
23
|
Kyrgiou M, Valasoulis G, Stasinou SM,
Founta C, Athanasiou A, Bennett P and Paraskevadis E: Proportion of
cervical excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a
predictor of pregnancy outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet.
128:141–147. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
