|
1
|
Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D,
Mathers C and Parkin DM: Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in
2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 127:2893–2917. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
2
|
Hori M, Matsuda T, Shibata A, Katanoda K,
Sobue T and Nishimoto H: Japan Cancer Surveillance Research Group:
Cancer incidence and incidence rates in Japan in 2009: A study of
32 population-based cancer registries for the monitoring of cancer
incidence in Japan (MCIJ) project. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 45:884–891.
2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
3
|
Hanley SJ, Yoshioka E, Ito Y and Kishi R:
HPV vaccination crisis in Japan. Lancet. 385(2571)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
4
|
Yagi A, Ueda Y, Egawa-Takata T, Tanaka Y,
Nakae R, Morimoto A, Terai Y, Ohmichi M, Ichimura T, Sumi T, et al:
Realistic fear of cervical cancer risk in Japan depending on birth
year. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 13:1700–1704. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
5
|
Cancer Registry and Statistics Cancer
Information Service, National Cancer Center, Japan. Available from:
https://ganjoho.jp/reg_stat/statistics/dl_screening/index.html#a16.
|
|
6
|
Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, Lopez
A, Vieira M, Ribeiro R, Buda A, Yan X, Shuzhong Y, Chetty N, et al:
Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for
cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 379:1895–1904. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
7
|
Malzoni M, Tinelli R, Cosentino F, Fusco A
and Malzoni C: Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus
abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients
with early cervical cancer: Our experience. Ann Surg Oncol.
16:1316–1323. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
8
|
Nezhat FR, Datta MS, Liu C, Chuang L and
Zakashansky K: Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total
laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for
treatment of early cervical cancer. JSLS. 12:227–237.
2008.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
9
|
Hao X, Han S and Wang Y: Comparison of
conventional laparoscopy and robotic radical hysterectomy for
early-stage cervical cancer: A meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Ther. 11
(Suppl 1):C258–C264. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
10
|
Ko EM, Muto MG, Berkowitz RS and Feltmate
CM: Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: A comparative study
at a single institution. Gynecol Oncol. 111:425–430.
2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
11
|
Magrina JF, Kho RM, Weaver AL, Montero RP
and Magtibay PM: Robotic radical hysterectomy: Comparison with
laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol. 109:86–91.
2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
12
|
Nitecki R, Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Krause
KJ, Tergas AI, Wright JD, Rauh-Hain JA and Melamed A: Survival
after minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy for
early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
JAMA Oncol. 6:1019–1027. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
13
|
Wang Y, Li B, Ren F, Song Z, Ouyang L and
Liu K: Survival after minimally invasive vs. open radical
hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A meta-analysis. Front Oncol.
10(1236)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
14
|
Dai D, Huang H, Feng Y, Wan T, Liu Z, Tong
C and Liu J: Minimally invasive surgery vs laparotomy for early
stage cervical cancer: A propensity score-matched cohort study.
Cancer Med. 9:9236–9245. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
15
|
Alfonzo E, Wallin E, Ekdahl L, Staf C,
Rådestad AF, Reynisson P, Stålberg K, Falconer H, Persson J and
Dahm-Kähler P: No survival difference between robotic and open
radical hysterectomy for women with early-stage cervical cancer:
Results from a nationwide population-based cohort study. Eur J
Cancer. 116:169–177. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
16
|
Zhang M, Dai W, Yuexiu S, Shi Y, Li X,
Jiang K, Shen J and Ying L: Comparison of minimally invasive versus
abdominal radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: An
updated meta-analysis. Front Oncol. 11(762921)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
17
|
Doo DW, Kirkland CT, Griswold LH, McGwin
G, Huh WK, Leath CA III and Kim KH: Comparative outcomes between
robotic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for IB1 cervical cancer:
Results from a single high volume institution. Gynecol Oncol.
153:242–247. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
18
|
Chiva L, Zanagnolo V, Querleu D,
Martin-Calvo N, Arévalo-Serrano J, Căpîlna ME, Fagotti A,
Kucukmetin A, Mom C, Chakalova G, et al: SUCCOR Study Group: SUCCOR
study: An international European cohort observational study
comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical
hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer. Int J
Gynecol Cancer. 30:1269–1277. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
19
|
Wiebren A and Tjalma A: The survival after
a radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer by open surgery is
significantly better then after minimal invasive surgery: Evidence
beats gut feeling! Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 229:195–197.
2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
