Value of DermaCheckup as a novel dedicated digital health solution for teledermatology
- Authors:
- Petre C. Ilie
- Simina Stefanescu
- Jane Aldridge
- Philip Gaffney
- James Belcher
- Lee Smith
View Affiliations
Affiliations: Department of Urology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich NR4 7UY, UK, Dermatology Department, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King's Lynn PE30 4ET, UK, L2S2 Ltd., Cambridge CB24 3DQ, UK, Centre for Health, Performance and Wellbeing, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK
- Published online on: January 24, 2022 https://doi.org/10.3892/mi.2022.30
-
Article Number:
5
-
Copyright: © Ilie
et al. This is an open access article distributed under the
terms of Creative
Commons Attribution License.
Metrics: Total
Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
This article is mentioned in:
Abstract
Daily healthcare is becoming increasingly costly and resource‑intensive, requiring vast human and financial resources. The primary aim of the present study was to present the initial findings regarding the diagnostic accuracy of a novel telemedicine platform, DermaCheckup, when compared with face‑to‑face clinical appointments. The secondary aim was to assess whether patient management plans produced via this telemedicine platform differ from those decided upon following a face‑to‑face dermatological consultation. The difference in time to diagnosis between the tele‑dermatology platform and standard care was also assessed. The DermaCheckup teledermatology service was implemented in March, 2020 as the COVID‑19 pandemic emerged in the UK. The present study assessed patients who underwent a face‑to‑face clinical consultation, who, prior to visiting the clinic, used the teledermatology platform; thus, the diagnosis made via teledermatology was able to be compared to that made following standard care. Comparisons were made between diagnosis, process of diagnosis and the time to diagnosis. A total of 29 consecutive patients entering one UK dermatology clinic were included in the study. The COVID‑19 pandemic resulted in face‑to‑face visits being challenging, owing to the risk of transmission of SARS‑CoV‑2. This limited the number of patients recruited into the study. The DermaCheckup application exhibited a very good level of agreement in terms of diagnosis with traditional face‑to‑face appointments. In the present study cohort, 93% of the patients could have been managed safely or referred immediately for a biopsy, thus avoiding a visit to the hospital. A substantial important improvement was also observed in the efficiencies that can be potentially achieved; the time to manage a patient decreased between 46‑22‑fold without considering the waiting time required between the time of organizing an appointment to the actual appointment.
View References
1
|
Triggle N: 10 charts that show why the NHS
is in trouble. BBC News 2021 (online) Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-42572110. Accessed
March 15, 2021.
|
2
|
Later Life in the United Kingdom. 2019.
http://www.ageuk.org.uk/globalassets/age-uk/documents/reports-and-publications/later_life_uk_factsheet.pdf.
Accessed March 15, 2021.
|
3
|
Eedy D: Dermatology: A specialty in
crisis. Clin Med (Lond). 15:509–510. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
4
|
Giavina-Bianchi M, Santos AP and Cordioli
E: Teledermatology reduces dermatology refferals and improves
access to specialists. EClinicalMedicine.
29-30(100641)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
5
|
O'Connor DM, Jew OS, Perman MJ,
Castelo-Soccio LA, Winston FK and McMahon PJ: . Diagnostic accuracy
of pediatric teledermatology using parent-submitted photographs: A
randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 153:1243–1248.
2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
6
|
Yeboah CB, Harvey N, Krishnan R and Lipoff
JB: The impact of COVID-19 on teledermatology: A review. Dermatol
Clin. 39:599–608. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
7
|
Assis Acurcio F, Guerra Jr AA, Marino
Calvo MC, Nunes DH, Akerman M, Spinel LF, Garcia MM, Pereira RG,
Costa Borysow ID, Silva RR, et al: Cost-minimization analysis of
teledermatology versus conventional care in the Brazilian National
Health System. J Comp Eff Res. 10:1159–1168. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
8
|
Giavina-Bianchi M, Cordioli E and Dos
Santos AP: Accuracy of deep neural network in triaging common skin
diseases of primary care attention. Front Med (Lausanne).
8(670300)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
9
|
Elliott L and Sharma M: Teledermatology
2-week-wait skin cancer referrals during the COVID-19 pandemic: A
service evaluation. Clin Exp Dermatol Sep 24, 2021 (Epub ahead of
print).
|
10
|
Pala P, Bergler-Czop BS and Gwiżdż JM:
Teledermatology: Idea, benefits and risks of modern age-a
systematic review based on melanoma. Postepy Dermatol Alergol.
37:159–167. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
11
|
Hamad J, Fox A, Kammire MS, Hollis AN and
Khairat S: . Evaluating the experiences of new and existing
teledermatology patients during the COVID-19 pandemic:
Cross-sectional survey study. JMIR Dermatol.
4(e25999)2021.PubMed/NCBI View
Article : Google Scholar
|