|
1
|
Abbasalizadeh F, Abbasalizadeh S,
Pouraliakbar S and Bastani P: Correlation between nonreassuring
patterns in fetal cardiotocography and birth asphyxia. Int J
Women's Health Reprod Sci. 3:151–154. 2015.
|
|
2
|
Acharya G, Sonesson SE, Flo K, Räsänen J
and Odibo A: Hemodynamic aspects of normal human feto-placental
(umbilical) circulation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 95:672–682.
2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
3
|
Ahearne CE, Boylan GB and Murray DM: Short
and long term prognosis in perinatal asphyxia: An update. World J
Clin Pediatr. 5:67–74. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
4
|
Alfirevic Z, Devane D and Gyte GM:
Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal
monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev. 5(CD006066)2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
5
|
Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte GM and
Cuthbert A: Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of
electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during
labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2(CD006066)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
6
|
Tsiligkeridou S, Bolou A, Xanthos T and
Gourounti K: Perinatal and neonatal outcomes using cardiotocography
versus STAN and cardiotocography: A systematic review. Maedica
(Bucur). 18:684–691. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
7
|
Martis R, Emilia O, Nurdiati DS and Brown
J: Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for
fetal well-being. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2(CD008680)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
8
|
Devane D, Lalor JG, Daly S, McGuire W and
Smith V: Cardiotocography versus intermittent auscultation of fetal
heart on admission to labour ward for assessment of fetal
wellbeing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (CD005122)2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
9
|
Lewis D and Downe S: FIGO Intrapartum
Fetal Monitoring Expert Consensus Panel. FIGO consensus guidelines
on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Intermittent auscultation. Int J
Gynaecol Obstet. 131:9–12. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
10
|
Ayres-de-Campos D, Spong CY and
Chandraharan E: FIGO Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring Expert Consensus
Panel. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring:
Cardiotocography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 131:13–24. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
11
|
Medeiros TKS, Dobre M, da Silva DMB,
Brateanu A, Baltatu OC and Campos LA: Intrapartum fetal heart rate:
A possible predictor of neonatal acidemia and APGAR score. Front
Physiol. 9(1489)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
12
|
Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, Hauth J
and Moore T: The 2008 national institute of child health and human
development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: Update
on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. Obstet
Gynecol. 112:661–666. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
13
|
No authors listed: Intrapartum care.
London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE),
2023.
|
|
14
|
Korf JM, McCullough LD and Caretti V: A
narrative review on treatment strategies for neonatal hypoxic
ischemic encephalopathy. Transl Pediatr. 12:1552–1571.
2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
15
|
Visser GH and Ayres-de-Campos D: FIGO
Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring Expert Consensus Panel: FIGO consensus
guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Adjunctive
technologies. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 131:25–29. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
16
|
Francis F, Luz S, Wu H, Townsend R and
Stock SS: Machine learning to classify cardiotocography for fetal
hypoxia detection. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2023:1–4.
2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
17
|
Devane D, Lalor J and Bonnar J: The use of
intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: A national
survey. Ir Med J. 100:360–362. 2007.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
Errington M and Church S: Clinical risk
management (3): Learning from experience. Pract Midwife. 8:49–52.
2005.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19
|
Pinas A and Chandraharan E: Continuous
cardiotocography during labour: Analysis, classification and
management. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 30:33–47.
2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
20
|
Smith V, Begley CM, Clarke M and Devane D:
Professionals' views of fetal monitoring during labour: A
systematic review and thematic analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth.
12(166)2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
21
|
Devane D, Lalor JG, Daly S, McGuire W,
Cuthbert A and Smith V: Cardiotocography versus intermittent
auscultation of fetal heart on admission to labour ward for
assessment of fetal wellbeing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
1(CD005122)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
22
|
Garabedian C, Butruille L, Drumez E,
Servan Schreiber E, Bartolo S, Bleu G, Mesdag V, Deruelle P, De
Jonckheere J and Houfflin-Debarge V: Inter-observer reliability of
4 fetal heart rate classifications. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod.
46:131–135. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
23
|
Frey HA, Liu X, Lynch CD, Musindi W,
Samuels P, Rood KM, Thung SF, Bakk JM, Cheng W and Landon MB: An
evaluation of fetal heart rate characteristics associated with
neonatal encephalopathy: A case-control study. BJOG. 125:1480–1487.
2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
24
|
Gunasena CGA and Jayasundara JMSW:
Intra-partum fetal monitoring-cardiotocograph. Sri Lanka J Obstet
Gynaecol. 38:19–26. 2016.
|
|
25
|
Clark SL, Meyers JA, Frye DK, Garthwaite
T, Lee AJ and Perlin JB: Recognition and response to electronic
fetal heart rate patterns: Impact on newborn outcomes and primary
cesarean delivery rate in women undergoing induction of labor. Am J
Obstet Gynecol. 212:494.e1–e6. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
26
|
Clark SL, Nageotte MP, Garite TJ, Freeman
RK, Miller DA, Simpson KR, Belfort MA, Dildy GA, Parer JT,
Berkowitz RL, et al: Intrapartum management of category II fetal
heart rate tracings: Towards standardization of care. Am J Obstet
Gynecol. 209:89–97. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
27
|
Herrera CA and Silver RM: Perinatal
asphyxia from the obstetric standpoint: Diagnosis and
Interventions. Clin Perinatol. 43:423–438. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
28
|
Yu Y, Gao J, Liu J, Tang Y, Zhong M, He J,
Liao S, Wang X, Liu X, Cao Y, et al: Perinatal maternal
characteristics predict a high risk of neonatal asphyxia: A
multi-center retrospective cohort study in China. Front Med
(Lausanne). 9(944272)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
29
|
Holzmann M, Wretler S, Cnattingius S and
Nordström L: Cardiotocography patterns and risk of intrapartum
fetal acidemia. J Perinat Med. 43:473–479. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
30
|
Maso G, Piccoli M, De Seta F, Parolin S,
Banco R, Camacho Mattos L, Bogatti P and Alberico S: Intrapartum
fetal heart rate monitoring interpretation in labour: A critical
appraisal. Minerva Ginecol. 67:65–79. 2015.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
31
|
Modanlou HD and Murata Y: Sinusoidal heart
rate pattern: Reappraisal of its definition and clinical
significance. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 30:169–180. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
32
|
No authors listed. ACOG committee opinion
No. 766: Approaches to limit intervention during labor and birth.
Obstet Gynecol. 133:e164–e173. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
33
|
Nageotte MP: Fetal heart rate monitoring.
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 20:144–148. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
34
|
Vintzileos AM and Smulian JC:
Decelerations, tachycardia, and decreased variability: Have we
overlooked the significance of longitudinal fetal heart rate
changes for detecting intrapartum fetal hypoxia? Am J Obstet
Gynecol. 215:261–264. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
35
|
Chauhan SP, Klauser CK, Woodring TC,
Sanderson M, Magann EF and Morrison JC: Intrapartum nonreassuring
fetal heart rate tracing and prediction of adverse outcomes:
Interobserver variability. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 199:623.e1–e5.
2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
36
|
Jia YJ, Ghi T, Pereira S, Gracia
Perez-Bonfils A and Chandraharan E: Pathophysiological
interpretation of fetal heart rate tracings in clinical practice.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 228:622–644. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
37
|
Arnold JJ and Gawrys BL: Intrapartum fetal
monitoring. Am Fam Physician. 102:158–167. 2020.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
38
|
Eden RD, Evans MI, Evans SM and Schifrin
BS: Reengineering electronic fetal monitoring interpretation: Using
the fetal reserve index to anticipate the need for emergent
operative delivery. Reprod Sci. 25:487–497. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
39
|
Evans MI, Britt DW, Eden RD, Gallagher P,
Evans SM and Schifrin BS: The fetal reserve index significantly
outperforms ACOG category system in predicting cord blood base
excess and pH: A methodological failure of the category system
comparative study. Reprod Sci. 26:858–863. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
40
|
Syvälahti T, Tuiskula A, Nevalainen P,
Metsäranta M, Haataja L, Vanhatalo S and Tokariev A: Networks of
cortical activity show graded responses to perinatal asphyxia.
Pediatr Res: Dec 22, 2023 (Epub ahead of print).
|
|
41
|
Okulu E, Hirfanoglu IM, Satar M, Erdeve O,
Koc E, Ozlu F, Gokce M, Armangil D, Tunc G, Demirel N, et al: An
observational, multicenter, registry-based cohort study of Turkish
neonatal society in neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy.
PLoS One. 18(e0295759)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
42
|
Kodidhi A, Riley M and Vesoulis Z: The
influence of late prematurity on the encephalopathy exam of infants
with neonatal encephalopathy. J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 16:693–700.
2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
43
|
Giussani DA: The fetal brain sparing
response to hypoxia: Physiological mechanisms. J Physiol.
594:1215–1230. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
44
|
Graham EM, Ruis KA, Hartman AL,
Northington FJ and Fox HE: A systematic review of the role of
intrapartum hypoxia-ischemia in the causation of neonatal
encephalopathy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 199:587–595. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
45
|
Graham EM, Adami RR, McKenney SL, Jennings
JM, Burd I and Witter FR: Diagnostic accuracy of fetal heart rate
monitoring in the identification of neonatal encephalopathy. Obstet
Gynecol. 124:507–513. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
46
|
Ayres-de-Campos D and Arulkumaran S: FIGO
Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring Expert Consensus Panel. FIGO consensus
guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Physiology of fetal
oxygenation and the main goals of intrapartum fetal monitoring. Int
J Gynaecol Obstet. 131:5–8. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
47
|
Malamitsi-Puchner A, Nikolaou KE and
Puchner KP: Intrauterine growth restriction, brain-sparing effect,
and neurotrophins. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1092:293–296. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
48
|
MacLennan AH, Thompson SC and Gecz J:
Cerebral palsy: Causes, pathways, and the role of genetic variants.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 213:779–788. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
49
|
Rei M, Ayres-de-Campos D and Bernardes J:
Neurological damage arising from intrapartum hypoxia/acidosis. Best
Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 30:79–86. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
50
|
Lutomski JE, Meaney S, Greene RA, Ryan AC
and Devane D: Expert systems for fetal assessment in labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 4(CD010708)2015.
|
|
51
|
Santo S, Ayres-de-Campos D, Costa-Santos
C, Schnettler W, Ugwumadu A and Da Graça LM: FM-Compare
Collaboration. Agreement and accuracy using the FIGO, ACOG and NICE
cardiotocography interpretation guidelines. Acta Obstet Gynecol
Scand. 96:166–175. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
52
|
Sabol BA and Caughey AB: Acidemia in
neonates with a 5-minute Apgar score of 7 or greater-what are the
outcomes? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 215:486.e1–e6. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
53
|
Silberstein T, Sheiner E, Salem SY, Hamou
B, Aricha B, Baumfeld Y, Yohay Z, Elharar D, Idan I and Yohay D:
Fetal heart rate monitoring category 3 during the 2nd stage of
labor is an independent predictor of fetal acidosis. J Matern Fetal
Neonatal Med. 30:257–260. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
54
|
Ogunyemi D, Jovanovski A, Friedman P,
Sweatman B and Madan I: Temporal and quantitative associations of
electronic fetal heart rate monitoring patterns and neonatal
outcomes†. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 32:3115–3124.
2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
55
|
Reif P, Schott S, Boyon C, Richter J,
Kavšek G, Timoh KN, Haas J, Pateisky P, Griesbacher A, Lang U and
Ayres-de-Campos D: Does knowledge of fetal outcome influence the
interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocography and subsequent
clinical management? A multicentre European study. BJOG.
123:2208–2217. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
56
|
Ramapraba S: Correlation of non-reassuring
fetal heart rate pattern with cord blood PH and its perinatal
outcome. Acta Sci Med Sci. 2:49–52. 2018.
|
|
57
|
Cahill AG, Tuuli MG, Stout MJ, López JD
and Macones GA: A prospective cohort study of fetal heart rate
monitoring: Deceleration area is predictive of fetal acidemia. Am J
Obstet Gynecol. 218:523.e1–523.e12. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
58
|
Tsikouras P, Koukouli Z, Niesigk B, Manav
B, Farmakides G, Csorba R, Galazios G and Teichmann AT: Predictive
value of fetal scalp pH and base excess for fetal acidosis and poor
neonatal outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 31:3166–3171.
2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
59
|
Clark SL, Hamilton EF, Garite TJ, Timmins
A, Warrick PA and Smith S: The limits of electronic fetal heart
rate monitoring in the prevention of neonatal metabolic acidemia.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 216:163.e1–163.e6. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
60
|
Johnson CT, Burd I, Raghunathan R,
Northington FJ and Graham EM: Perinatal inflammation/infection and
its association with correction of metabolic acidosis in
hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. J Perinatol. 36:448–452.
2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
61
|
Katsuragi S, Parer JT, Noda S, Onishi J,
Kikuchi H and Ikeda T: Mechanism of reduction of newborn metabolic
acidemia following application of a rule-based 5-category
color-coded fetal heart rate management framework. J Matern Fetal
Neonatal Med. 28:1608–1613. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
62
|
Macones GA, Hankins GDV, Spong CY, Hauth J
and Moore T: The 2008 national institute of child health and human
development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: Update
on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. J Obstet
Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 37:510–515. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
63
|
Hankins GDV and Miller DA: A review of the
2008 NICHD research planning workshop: Recommendations for fetal
heart rate terminology and interpretation. Clin Obstet Gynecol.
54:3–7. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
64
|
Lee KS, Choi ES, Nam YJ, Liu NW, Yang YS,
Kim HY, Ahn KH and Hong SC: Real-time classification of fetal
status based on deep learning and cardiotocography data. J Med
Syst. 47(82)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
65
|
Miller DA and Miller LA: Electronic fetal
heart rate monitoring: Applying principles of patient safety. Am J
Obstet Gynecol. 206:278–283. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
66
|
Magawa S, Maki S, Nii M, Yamaguchi M,
Tamaishi Y, Enomoto N, Takakura S, Toriyabe K, Kondo E and Ikeda T:
Evaluation of fetal acidemia during delivery using the conventional
5-tier classification and Rainbow systems. PLoS One.
18(e0287535)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
67
|
Troha N, Razem K, Luzovec U and Lucovnik
M: Comparison of four intrapartum cardiotocography classifications
for predicting neonatal acidemia at birth. J Pregnancy.
2023(5853889)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
68
|
Miller DA: Intrapartum fetal heart rate
monitoring: A standardized approach to management. Clin Obstet
Gynecol. 54:22–27. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
69
|
Barstow C, Gauer R and Jamieson B:
Clinical inquiries. How does electronic fetal heart rate monitoring
affect labor and delivery outcomes? J Fam Pract. 59:653a–b.
2010.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
70
|
Tarvonen MJ, Lear CA, Andersson S, Gunn AJ
and Teramo KA: Increased variability of fetal heart rate during
labour: A review of preclinical and clinical studies. BJOG.
129:2070–2081. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
71
|
Akyıldız D, Çoban A, Gör Uslu F and
Taşpınar A: Effects of obstetric interventions during labor on
birth process and newborn health. Florence Nightingale J Nurs.
29:9–21. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
72
|
Ayres-de-Campos D, Arteiro D, Costa-Santos
C and Bernardes J: Knowledge of adverse neonatal outcome alters
clinicians' interpretation of the intrapartum cardiotocograph.
BJOG. 118:978–984. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
73
|
Aquino CI, Amadori R, Vaianella E,
Bonassisa S, Libretti A, Surico D and Remorgida V: Cardiotocography
pattern: Not always a true friend. Acta Biomed. 94
(S1)(e2023054)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
74
|
Grivell RM, Alfirevic Z, Gyte GML and
Devane D: Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev. 2015(CD007863)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
75
|
Ugwumadu A: Understanding
cardiotocographic patterns associated with intrapartum fetal
hypoxia and neurologic injury. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol.
27:509–536. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
76
|
Knupp RJ, Andrews WW and Tita ATN: The
future of electronic fetal monitoring. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet
Gynaecol. 67:44–52. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
77
|
Bloom SL, Spong CY, Thom E, Varner MW,
Rouse DJ, Weininger S, Ramin SM, Caritis SN, Peaceman A, Sorokin Y,
et al: Fetal pulse oximetry and cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med.
355:2195–2202. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
78
|
Kamala BA, Ersdal HL, Dalen I, Abeid MS,
Ngarina MM, Perlman JM and Kidanto HL: Implementation of a novel
continuous fetal Doppler (Moyo) improves quality of intrapartum
fetal heart rate monitoring in a resource-limited tertiary hospital
in Tanzania: An observational study. PLoS One.
13(e0205698)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
79
|
Balayla J and Shrem G: Use of artificial
intelligence (AI) in the interpretation of intrapartum fetal heart
rate (FHR) tracings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch
Gynecol Obstet. 300:7–14. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
80
|
Iraji MS: Prediction of fetal state from
the cardiotocogram recordings using neural network models. Artif
Intell Med. 96:33–44. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
