
BK channels and alcohol tolerance: Insights from studies on Drosophila, nematodes, rodents and cell lines: A systematic review
- Authors:
- Published online on: April 2, 2025 https://doi.org/10.3892/mi.2025.232
- Article Number: 33
-
Copyright : © Ignat et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY 4.0].
Abstract
Introduction
Large-conductance calcium and voltage-activated potassium (BK) channels are distinctive transmembrane proteins highly selective to potassium ions (K+). They regulate excitability, calcium signaling and potassium efflux across various species, from worms to mammals (1). Encoded by the single gene, potassium calcium-activated channel (KCN)MA1 (also known as Slo1), these channels help prevent hyperexcitability and potential cellular damage by promoting the extrusion of potassium, thereby maintaining cellular homeostasis. The regulation of K+ flow is essential for establishing and resetting the resting membrane potential, which in turn governs the action potential of excitable cells. The opening of BK channels results in a significant outflow of K+, leading to the hyperpolarization of the cellular membrane potential (2,3).
The K+ channel family comprises ≥79 genes in mammals that encode various subtypes of potassium channels, all characterized by a selectively permeable transmembrane pore for K+. BK channels, prevalent throughout the central nervous system (CNS), play vital roles in regulating circadian rhythms, blood flow, muscle contractions and renal excretion (4). When activated, these channels release K+, leading to hyperpolarization of the cellular membrane potential, which in turn modulates neuronal excitability and synaptic function. This process ultimately affects both motor skills and cognitive behavior (5). A summary of the role of BK channels in various physiological processes and their effects on nematodes, fruit flies and humans is presented in Fig. 1.
![]() |
Figure 1Role of BK channels in various physiological processes and their effects on nematodes, fruit flies and humans. BK channel, large-conductance calcium and voltage-activated potassium channel. |
BK channel subunits
The β subunits of BK channels are auxiliary proteins that regulate the activity of BK channels. These subunits, encoded by KCNMB, are categorized into four types: i) β1; ii) β2; iii) β3; and iv) β4. Each type exhibits unique tissue distribution and functional characteristics. The β1 subunit is expressed predominantly in smooth muscle cells, such as blood vessels, airways, and the urinary system, and is implicated in vasodilation and blood flow regulation. The β2 subunit, found mainly in the CNS, some endocrine cells and the ovaries, contributes to rapid signal processing in neurons, and may influence neuronal excitability and hormone secretion. The β3 subunit is involved in processes like spermatogenesis and insulin secretion. The β4 subunit is expressed at high levels in neurons of the CNS. Associated with neuronal adaptation and neuroprotection, it plays a critical role in alcohol tolerance and susceptibility to epilepsy. Each β subunit designs the function of the BK channel to meet the specific needs of the tissue in which it is expressed, making them critical for normal physiological processes and potential targets for therapeutic intervention (6,7).
The α subunit is the primary pore-forming component of BK channels. It consists of seven transmembrane segments (S0-S6), with the S0 segment being unique to BK channels. This subunit determines the basic properties of the channel, such as its conductance and sensitivity to voltage and calcium (8). BK channels can associate with auxiliary β subunits (β1-β4), which modulate the properties of the channel. The β4 subunit (KCNMB4) is primarily located in the brain and alters the gating properties of the channel, regulating neuronal excitability and protecting against excessive activity. The effects of the β subunits on ethanol (EtOH)-induced potentiation of BK channels vary. In mice, under chronic intermittent EtOH conditions, β1 deficiency increases EtOH consumption during withdrawal, while β4 absence reduces it (5,8).
BK channels and alcohol use disorder (AUD)
EtOH facilitates the activation of BK channels at neuro-hypophysial terminals, thereby modulating the release of vasopressin and oxytocin. However, it does not affect BK channels in the cell body and dendrites (9). It may also influence BK channel movement to the cell surface, leading to increased internalization within 3-6 h and contributing to alcohol tolerance. It is unclear whether this interaction directly causes intoxication or chronic tolerance; however, behavioral evidence supports both possibilities (10,11). Both acute and chronic alcohol exposure affect synaptic plasticity and influence synaptic transmission efficacy (11).
EtOH affects BK channels and G-protein-gated rectifying potassium channels in the brain, which regulate responses in the reward circuit and may be potential targets for treating AUD (12,13). Additionally, EtOH increases the expression of a two-pore potassium channel (KCNK12) in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and its knockdown increases alcohol consumption (14). Mulholland et al (15) investigated how EtOH exposure induces plasticity in neural circuits, which is crucial for understanding the way alcohol affects the brain over short- and long-term periods. This plasticity underlies the development of tolerance and addiction.
AUD is a multifaceted neurological condition believed to stem from a combination of genetic, epigenetic and environmental influences. These factors contribute to the development of patterns of excessive alcohol consumption and dependence (16-18). Research has indicated that changes in KCa2+ channels are responsible for the flexibility of the ability of the brain to generate electrical signals and may influence the drive to seek alcohol, particularly during periods of abstinence (19,20).
Recent research has revealed explicit connections between the modulation of BK channels and AUD. BK channels are expressed in key brain regions implicated in reward processing and addiction, such as the nucleus accumbens and the VTA. The interaction of alcohol with BK channels in these areas can enhance dopamine release, reinforcing alcohol-seeking behaviors and contribute to neuroadaptive changes that underlie addiction (19,20).
Chronic alcohol consumption leads to changes in BK channel subunit expression and sensitivity, contributing to alcohol dependence. Polymorphisms in genes encoding BK channel subunits have been associated with susceptibility to AUD in specific populations. Variants that modify BK channel activity may influence individual responses to alcohol and predispose individuals to problematic use (5,21).
During alcohol withdrawal, the reduced BK channel function contributes to neuronal hyperexcitability and seizure susceptibility. This suggests a role for BK channels in managing withdrawal symptoms and the risk of relapse. BK channels are involved in stress responses and are often co-factors in the development and persistence of AUD. The dysregulation of these channels may exacerbate stress-induced drinking behavior (22).
BK channel activators are being explored to counteract hyperexcitability during withdrawal or reduce alcohol-induced euphoria. In some contexts, BK channel blockers may reduce the rewarding effects of alcohol, potentially curbing addiction. Studies using rodents have demonstrated that the pharmacological manipulation of BK channels alters alcohol consumption patterns and withdrawal severity (22,23). Electrophysiological recordings demonstrate that the effects of alcohol on neuronal excitability are mediated partly through BK channel modulation (24).
The fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, is a potent model organism due to its genetic tractability, short life cycle and availability of sophisticated genetic tools. Advanced genetic techniques in Drosophila allow for the precise manipulation of genes and pathways, providing clear causal links between genetic changes and phenotypic outcomes related to drug tolerance and dependence. The study by Ghezzi and Atkinson (21) explored the role of ion channels and receptors in mediating homeostatic responses to drugs. Alterations in ion channel function and receptor signaling pathways are identified as key components of adaptive responses to drug exposure (24-26).
In model organisms such as fruit flies, manipulating BK channel activity through genetic modification or pharmacological agents affects EtOH-related behaviors, such as locomotion, sedation and tolerance. Similar findings have been observed in rodents, where BK channel function influences alcohol consumption patterns, motor coordination and susceptibility to the effects of EtOH (27,28). In humans, genetic variations in the BK channel genes have been found to be associated with differences in alcohol sensitivity and susceptibility to AUD. Evidence from human studies suggests that drugs affecting BK channels can alter alcohol-related behaviors and potentially serve as therapeutic agents for the management of AUD (29-31).
Over the past 10 years, there has been a surge in knowledge about BK channels, including their expression, alcohol sensitivity and potential impact on neuronal activity in various brain regions such as the striatum (32). The genetic screening of Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) has revealed that mutations in the Slo-1 gene led to resistance to EtOH intoxication. This gene encodes a subunit of a K+ channel that limits excitatory neurotransmitter release. EtOH potentiates Slo-1, causing intoxication by reducing neurotransmitter release (33,34).
AUD is associated with marked medical, neurological and psychiatric comorbidities, leading to increased morbidity and mortality (35). At present, there are only some FDA-approved treatments for AUD, and their effectiveness in lowering relapse rates tends to be relatively limited (36-38). Research on gene expression changes should be considered preliminary and further validation experiments are thus required. However, data from drug interventions and knockout animal models can provide insight into potential causal associations. Recent studies using rodent models of AUD have identified variations in genes encoding K+ channels in the brains of animals with different alcohol intake levels. Notably, FDA-approved potassium channel regulators have been found to decrease alcohol intake in rats. Understanding the mechanisms through which alcohol interacts with these channels may help to elucidate the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying alcohol tolerance (39-41).
AUD involves both psychological factors, such as cravings, anxiety and stress, and biological factors such as changes in brain chemistry and neural circuitry (41). BK channels represent a point of convergence where these perspectives can be integrated. By studying BK channel activity, the way biological changes contribute to psychological experiences associated with alcohol use and addiction can be understood, providing a holistic view of the way these disorders develop and persist. BK channels are being explored as a potential therapeutic target for AUD. Understanding the contribution of these channels to alcohol tolerance is necessary for devising strategies to modulate BK channel activity, with the potential to mitigate tolerance and dependence. This translational approach, spanning from fundamental biological research to the development of potential treatments, represents an initial step in addressing this issue from a psychobiological standpoint.
In the present systematic review, the aim was to analyze the studies published in the literature regarding the implications of BK channels in developing alcohol tolerance. A detailed and complex understanding of BK channels and their role in alcohol tolerance is essential for advancing scientific knowledge, developing effective treatments and improving public health outcomes related to alcohol use and dependence.
Materials and methods
Search strategy
A literature search was conducted using two online databases: i) MEDLINE (accessible through PubMed); and ii) Web of Science Core Collection. This approach enabled the gathering of all relevant articles published from 2000 up until June, 2024. The key words used for the search were as follows: ‘bk channels’ OR ‘large conductance calcium-activated potassium channels’ AND ‘alcohol tolerance’.
Study selection and data extraction
During the manual selection process, examined titles, abstracts and full-text articles were carefully examined to assess their relevance to the topic. Of note, two authors independently categorized the articles identified according to established inclusion and exclusion criteria. Any discrepancies in their evaluations were resolved through discussions with a third author. This selection process adhered to the guidelines set forth by PRISMA (Fig. 2) (42). Additionally, any duplicate entries were automatically eliminated using the Mendeley Reference Manager version 2.130.2.
![]() |
Figure 2PRISMA flow diagram for search outcomes and screening process. |
Inclusion criteria
Studies were deemed suitable for inclusion in the systematic review if they met all of the following criteria: i) The title contained the relevant key words (bk channels, large conductance calcium-activated potassium channels, alcohol tolerance); ii) titles were at least somewhat related to the key words; iii) articles were either written in English or in other languages, provided that abstracts and full texts were translated into English; iv) abstracts were accessible; v) full texts were available; vi) there was a minimum level of outcomes and statistical analysis (including descriptive and/or inferential statistics, significance tests such as t-tests, ANOVA, or χ2 tests, regression, correlation analysis, or probability distributions); vii) the studies were experimental; and viii) the articles represented original research focused on the implications of BK channels in alcohol tolerance.
Exclusion criteria
Articles were excluded from the present study based on several criteria: i) Inappropriate study design or article format; ii) lack of relevance to the implications of BK channels in alcohol tolerance; iii) absence of an available abstract; iv) unavailability of the full text in English; and v) inclusion of computational studies. After determining eligibility, the remaining articles underwent a thorough full-text analysis. This thorough evaluation covered various aspects, including the objectives of each study, the animal models used, the interventions applied and the main findings.
Quality assessment and risk of bias
The Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) online tool version 0.3.0.900 was used to evaluate potential biases in 26 animal model studies. The resulting visualizations, which illustrate the risk of bias, are presented in Fig. 3. Additionally, the risk of bias in cell-line studies was assessed using the ROBINS-I online tool 2016 version, to evaluate risk in nonrandomized studies of interventions (Fig. 4) (43). The tool is available at https://mcguinlu.shinyapps.io/robvis/.
![]() |
Figure 3SYRCLE tool for assessing the risk of bias. The studies listed are as follows: Ghezzi et al (57), Cowmeadow et al (59), Cowmeadow et al (60), Wang et al (62), Wang et al (64), Ghezzi et al (66), Krishnan et al (68), Ghezzi et al (69), Li et al (71), Ghezzi et al (73), Li et al (74), Krishnan et al (76), Bettinger et al (81), Davis et al (82), Davis et al (84), Scott et al (48), Chen et al (86), Oh et al (87), Sterken et al (89), Knott et al (93), Pietrzykowski et al (95), Velázquez-Marrero et al (97), Marrero et al (98), Kreifeldt et al (102), Palacio et al (100), Okhuarobo et al (101). |
![]() |
Figure 4Risk of bias in non-randomized studies-of interventions (ROBINS-I). The studies listed are as follows: Feinberg-Zadek et al (103), Martin et al (104), Yuan et al (106), Pietrzykowski et al (107), Sitdikova et al (108), Handlechner et al (109), Velázquez-Marrero et al (110), Velázquez-Marrero et al (111), Cordero Padilla et al (112). |
A ‘low’ risk of bias indicates high confidence in the results of a study due to strong methodological safeguards. By contrast, a ‘high’ risk of bias points towards significant reliability concerns stemming from weaknesses in design or execution. Blinding in animal studies is often poorly implemented, leading to detection or performance bias and resulting in ‘unclear risk of bias’ according to the SYRCLE tool. Despite the ‘high’ risk in certain areas, the findings of a study can still be valuable. Overall risk is assessed by combining domain ratings and considering the study context, with mainly ‘low risk’ ratings indicating reliability (44-46). The overall risk of bias for studies in the present systematic review was ‘low’, with a detailed analysis presented in Table I.
![]() |
Table IRisk of bias. |
Results
The initial search identified 87 potentially relevant articles from PubMed and Web of Science. The Mendeley reference manager efficiently eliminated 17 duplicates. During the screening phase, 70 articles were analyzed based on their titles and abstracts, excluding 31 articles due to missing abstracts, ineligible study designs, or a mismatch with the overall aim of the review. The full texts were then reviewed to clarify the relevance of those abstracts that lacked sufficient information. Following these steps, the eligibility of 39 articles was assessed. However, four clinical studies were excluded as they did not specifically examine the role of BK channels in the mechanism of alcohol tolerance. Ultimately, 35 articles were identified which met the inclusion criteria, including studies on 12 Drosophila melanogaster populations, seven C. elegans, seven rodent populations and nine cell lines. A detailed analysis of their full texts was conducted. A summary of the included studies is presented in Tables II, III, IV and V, providing an easy-to-read reference for readers to interpret the findings chronologically. The present systematic review protocol has been registered in OSF Registries, and the published version can be accessed at https://osf.io/hv2jz (last accessed on October 30, 2024).
![]() |
Table IIDrosophila melanogaster studies. |
![]() |
Table IIICaenorhabditis elegans studies. |
![]() |
Table IVRodent studies. |
![]() |
Table VCell line studies. |
Discussion
Mechanisms of tolerance shared across organisms. The BK channels have become an essential molecular mechanism underlying addiction-related behaviors across multiple species, including Drosophila melanogaster (fruit flies), C. elegans (nematodes) and rodents. While there are species-specific variations in the mechanisms and behavioral outcomes, studies suggest evolutionary conservation in the role of BK channels in modulating neural excitability, reward pathways and responses to addictive substances (22,26,29-33).
EtOH tolerance involves similar signaling pathways across species, such as changes in neurotransmitter systems (GABAergic and glutamatergic systems) and ion channel modulation. Cellular adaptations, such as altered gene expression and protein phosphorylation, are conserved mechanisms that mediate alcohol tolerance. Mutations in the Slo gene lead to impaired tolerance in Drosophila melanogaster, as BK channel activity regulates neural excitability during repeated EtOH exposure. EtOH exposure increases Slo expression in specific neurons, suggesting a role in adaptation to substance exposure. Slo mutants show altered locomotion and EtOH-induced sedation behaviors, linking the BK channels to motor control and addiction-like behaviors (22,39).
Slo-1 channels reduce the synaptic release of neurotransmitters, stabilizing neural activity and preventing over-excitation associated with drug exposure in C. elegans. Mutant nematodes lacking functional Slo-1 exhibit abnormal movement and altered responses to environmental cues under the influence of drugs. BK channels encoded by KCNMA1 are similarly implicated in EtOH tolerance and withdrawal in mammals. Mice with an altered KCNMA1 function exhibit changes in alcohol preference, consumption and withdrawal severity (47).
Across all models, chronic EtOH exposure induces gene expression changes to adapt cellular functions. Transcription factors, such as myocyte enhancer factor 2 and cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) regulate synaptic plasticity genes in flies and rodents. In cell lines, EtOH-induced epigenetic modifications affect stress response and metabolism-related genes. In nematodes, gene transcriptional changes like Slo-1 contribute to tolerance (48).
Locomotor changes, such as impaired movement or sedation following acute EtOH exposure, are observed in flies, nematodes and rodents, reflecting conserved neural responses to alcohol. Repeated EtOH exposure leads to tolerance (reduced behavioral effect) in all groups. Across all three species, BK channels regulate the balance of excitation and inhibition in the nervous system, a critical factor in drug-induced plasticity. Their role in adapting neural circuits to repeated substance exposure highlights a conserved mechanism in managing neural stress and reward. While flies and worms provide insight into the genetic and cellular mechanisms, mice offer a model closer to humans for studying complex addiction-related behaviors (22).
Central role of neuronal plasticity
Alcohol exposure induces neural plasticity in all these organisms. For example, in C. elegans, alcohol affects neurotransmission by modulating GABAergic signaling and synaptic plasticity. In mice, chronic alcohol exposure alters synaptic strength, contributing to tolerance. Also, EtOH influences protein kinases (PKs), such as PKA and PKC across species, affecting ion channels and synaptic proteins. These signaling pathways are critical in C. elegans, Drosophila and mammalian cells for the development of tolerance (49,50).
Behavioral responses. In Drosophila, EtOH exposure leads to hyperactivity, followed by sedation and tolerance develops with repeated exposure. In C. elegans, EtOH attenuates movement and impairs egg-laying, with tolerance evident as recovery in these behaviors. Behavioral responses in mice include sedation, ataxia and eventually tolerance, with changes observed at molecular and circuit levels. In cell lines, studies focus on isolated molecular pathways, such as BK channel function or GABA receptor modulation without the influence of whole-organism dynamics (31,34,35,51).
Cellular stress responses. EtOH induces cellular stress across all systems. The upregulation of heat-shock proteins (HSPs) is observed in flies, nematodes, mice and cell lines, helping stabilize proteins and mitigate damage. The unfolded protein response pathway, primarily studied in cell lines and mice, is a conserved mechanism to protect cells from EtOH-induced ER stress (52).
Metabolic adaptations. Enzymatic pathways for EtOH metabolism involving alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and aldehyde dehydrogenase are conserved in flies, mice and some cell lines. While nematodes have limited alcohol metabolism, they still exhibit compensatory adaptations at the cellular level. Enhanced alcohol metabolism reduces EtOH availability and toxicity, contributing to tolerance (53).
Membrane adaptations. EtOH disrupts lipid bilayers in all systems. Chronic exposure alters membrane composition to stabilize neuronal and cellular function. In flies and cell lines, adaptations in lipid bilayers reduce the effects of EtOH on membrane proteins. Similar mechanisms are inferred in rodents and nematodes, although these are more pronounced in complex organisms (54,55).
Differences among organisms. C. elegans has a simple nervous system with 302 neurons, which renders the study of the genetic and molecular mechanisms easier, although it limits behavioral complexity. Drosophila has a more complex brain, allowing more nuanced behaviors, such as associative learning in response to alcohol. Mice have a highly complex nervous system and display a wide range of alcohol-related behaviors, including addiction-like symptoms and social interactions. Cell lines lack neural networks, so they serve as models for studying isolated cellular and molecular mechanisms, like BK channel function, in response to EtOH (24-26).
C. elegans and Drosophila are genetically tractable, allowing high-throughput genetic screens. Mice are less amenable to large-scale genetic manipulation but provide a closer model of human physiology. Cell lines provide unlimited manipulations of individual genes or pathways without whole-organism complexity (27,28,54).
Environmental factors, such as temperature and humidity markedly influence alcohol responses in Drosophila and C. elegans. In mammals, metabolic factors such as liver enzymes, for example ADH, play a critical role in alcohol processing. The effective concentration of EtOH required to modulate BK channels and elicit behavioral changes is typically lower in fruit flies due to their smaller size and metabolic differences compared to rodents. In simpler models (C. elegans and Drosophila), BK channel modulation primarily affects basic behaviors such as locomotion. In mice, BK channels play a role in more complex behaviors, including withdrawal and addiction-like processes (29,55).
Chronological presentation of Drosophila melanogaster, C. elegans, rodents and cell line studies
Numerous studies have provided notable insight into the effects of alcohol on the nervous system by investigating the interaction between BK channels and alcohol in various organisms and cell lines. Studies on genetics and electrophysiology have consistently indicated the marked influence of these channels on alcohol sensitivity, tolerance and adaptive plasticity. As such, they have become a focal point in alcohol research (56).
Drosophila melanogaster studies. Drosophila melanogaster, commonly known as the fruit fly, is used as a model organism in studying alcohol use and its effects due to its genetic similarity to humans. The fruit fly exhibits behavioral responses to alcohol analogous to those observed in mammals, including humans and has a short life cycle, allowing for rapid data generation and longitudinal studies over multiple generations in a relatively short period (12). The present systematic review presents 12 studies conducted on fruit flies from 2004 to 2016; these are as follows:
In 2004, Ghezzi et al (57) conducted a study using mutants and transgenic flies to manipulate the expression of the Slo gene, which codes for the BK channel. To induce rapid tolerance, the flies were exposed to benzyl alcohol. Upon exposure to benzyl alcohol, Drosophila exhibited a rapid and significant increase in Slo gene expression within their nervous system. Conversely, mutant flies with a disrupted Slo gene did not develop tolerance. Electrophysiological recordings confirmed that neurons from flies with heightened Slo expression displayed an elevated potassium current, likely contributing to their reduced sensitivity to sedative drugs. These findings provide insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying drug tolerance and identify potential targets for addressing issues related to drug abuse and addiction (58). In a following study, Cowmeadow et al (59) used wild-type Drosophila and a range of Slo mutants, such as null mutants without functional Slo genes and hypomorphic mutants with diminished Slo function, to trigger acute and chronic EtOH tolerance. Transgenic flies with inducible Slo expression exhibited a heightened tolerance when this gene expression was elevated, indicating that heightened BK channel activity plays a role in EtOH tolerance.
In 2006, it was shown that wild-type Drosophila developed notable EtOH tolerance after repeated exposures, as indicated by reduced sedation times upon subsequent EtOH exposures (60). Conversely, mutant strains with impaired SLO genes did not exhibit the same tolerance level. Furthermore, flies with inducible SLO expression demonstrated faster recovery times and increased resistance to EtOH-induced sedation than control flies. Understanding the molecular pathways involved in EtOH tolerance could be instrumental in the development of targeted therapies for managing alcohol dependence and withdrawal. This knowledge has the potential to enhance treatment outcomes for individuals with AUD (60,61).
In another study, Wang et al (62) sought to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms responsible for enduring changes in gene expression and behavior following repeated drug exposure. Their focus centered on the influence of histone modifications and DNA methylation, and employed the loss of righting reflex assay to gauge the development of EtOH tolerance. Analyses of chromatin immunoprecipitation assays indicated that exposure to EtOH resulted in elevated levels of histone acetylation at the promoters of genes associated with drug tolerance. These modifications are typically indicative of active transcription. Furthermore, examination of DNA methylation patterns revealed alterations in response to EtOH exposure, particularly in genes related to the regulation of synaptic function and neural plasticity. Drosophila melanogaster with mutations in genes involved in histone modification and DNA methylation exhibited compromised development of EtOH tolerance (63).
In 2009, the study by Wang et al (64) aimed to understand the molecular mechanisms by which CREB modulates BK channel gene expression in response to drug exposure. Mutant fly strains with modified CREB binding sites in the SLO promoter were utilized to evaluate the functional significance of CREB regulation. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays revealed the binding of CREB to the promoter region of the SLO gene, indicating direct regulatory involvement. Exposure to EtOH resulted in elevated expression of the SLO gene, and this upregulation was determined to be facilitated by CREB, as evidenced by reduced SLO expression in flies with impaired CREB activity. The binding of CREB to the SLO promoter enhances gene expression, thereby contributing to physiological adaptations associated with the development of tolerance (65).
In the study by Ghezzi et al (66), the primary objective was to investigate the role of BK channels in the development of drug tolerance and dependence, focusing on their influence as counter-adaptive mechanisms. Flies with reduced BK channel activity exhibited an increased sensitivity to EtOH-induced sedation. Conversely, flies with overexpressed BK channels were more resistant to sedation. Withdrawal symptoms were more severe in flies with reduced BK channel activity, indicating a heightened state of dependence. In addition, BK channels were identified as applying a counter-adaptive function, antagonizing the development of tolerance. The overexpression of these channels was associated with a reduction in tolerance development. Furthermore, the induced elevation of slowpoke gene expression resulted in replicating the tolerant phenotype. This implies that modulating BK channel activity has the potential to mimic the physiological adjustments observed in drug tolerance (67).
Krishnan et al (68) concluded in 2012 that dynamin is essential for developing EtOH tolerance in Drosophila. By regulating endocytosis and vesicle trafficking, dynamin influences the neuronal adaptations required for tolerance. Subsequently, 1 year later, Ghezzi et al (69) identified several neuronal populations as critical for developing EtOH tolerance. Key regions included the mushroom bodies and specific neurons within the central brain. Their study provided a detailed map of the neurons and genetic pathways of Drosophila involved in EtOH tolerance. The research advanced the understanding of the neural and molecular mechanisms underlying drug tolerance by demonstrating the roles of specific neurons and the cAMP signaling pathway (70).
Li et al (71) identified a specific DNA element within the Drosophila genome that plays a crucial role in regulating the expression of genes associated with drug tolerance and withdrawal. The functional analysis results indicated that the identified DNA element plays a vital role in regulating the expression of the SLO gene. Altering this DNA element led to notable changes in the behavioral responses of the flies to EtOH (72). Specifically, modifications to the DNA element affected the development of drug tolerance and the manifestation of withdrawal symptoms. This study employed transgenic flies to illustrate that changes in the regulatory DNA element had a direct impact on the behavioral traits associated with drug tolerance and withdrawal (71).
The 2014 study by Ghezzi et al (73) investigated the role of BK channel gene expression in the susceptibility of Drosophila to EtOH withdrawal seizures. It was found that flies with elevated levels of BK channel expression experienced more severe withdrawal seizures, which was confirmed through behavioral assays. In 2015, the researchers identified a specific histone modification (H3K4me3) associated with active gene transcription at the SLO BK channel gene locus in Drosophila muscle tissue. It was suggested that specific transcription factors bind to this regulatory DNA element, facilitating the recruitment of the transcriptional machinery and histone modifications that activate gene expression (74). A particular element of DNA in the 5' flanking region of the SLO gene was found to be crucial for its expression in muscle tissue. These findings have broader implications for epigenetics, highlighting the way specific histone modifications and DNA elements control gene expression (74,75).
Subsequently, a specific DNA element within the SLO gene was identified that modulates EtOH tolerance in Drosophila. Behavioral assays were administered to evaluate EtOH tolerance in flies with and without the intact DNA element. Flies with a disrupted or deleted regulatory element exhibited a significantly diminished ability to develop tolerance to EtOH compared to control flies. Flies lacking this regulatory element displayed altered SLO gene expression, corresponding to impaired EtOH tolerance (76,77).
C. elegans studies. C. elegans is a tiny, transparent nematode (roundworm) that has become a potent model organism in biological research. Its simplicity, well-characterized biology and extensive genetic tools render it ideal for studying various biological processes, including the function of ion channels, such as BK channels and the effects of alcohol (78). Nematodes possess a relatively simple nervous system comprising 302 neurons, rendering them an advantageous model for investigating neuronal circuits and behaviors. Alcohol exposure induces changes in C. elegans behaviors, including alterations in locomotion, egg-laying and feeding patterns (79). Moreover, genetic studies involving C. elegans mutants with modified BK channel function have demonstrated varying sensitivities to alcohol. These findings contribute to the elucidation of the genetic and molecular mechanisms that underlie alcohol sensitivity and tolerance, thereby offering potential targets for therapeutic interventions related to AUD (79).
The short lifecycle of C. elegans (~3 days from egg to adult) enables quick data generation and long-term studies across multiple generations. It is also easily manipulated genetically, allowing for precise control and observation of gene function. These are only some of the advantages of using C. elegans in BK channel and alcohol research (80). A number of genetic pathways in C. elegans are conserved across higher organisms, including humans. Thus, discoveries in C. elegans frequently relate to understanding human biology and diseases. The following eight studies conducted on nematodes will be analyzed.
In 2012, it was found that altering the lipid composition of C. elegans affected the development of acute tolerance to EtOH (81). Mutants with alterations in genes involved in lipid metabolism displayed different levels of acute EtOH tolerance compared to wild-type C. elegans. Behavioral assays demonstrated that changes in the lipid environment affected the locomotion of C. elegans in response to EtOH. Wild-type and mutant worms exhibited varying degrees of reduced movement after EtOH exposure, associated with their lipid composition (81). Supplementation of the diet with polyunsaturated fatty acids enhanced the development of acute EtOH tolerance. Conversely, supplementation with saturated fatty acids impaired the development of tolerance. Demonstrating that lipid composition can influence tolerance development, that study provides insight into the tolerance molecular mechanisms of EtOH, which could have broader implications for understanding similar processes in higher organisms, including humans (81).
Subsequently, 2 years later, Davis et al (82) aimed to pinpoint a specific amino acid residue in the BK potassium channel that is necessary for the activation of the channel by alcohol and to determine the mechanisms through which this residue contributes to alcohol-induced behavioral changes, specifically intoxication. It was found that a specific missense mutation, T381I, in the RCK1 domain of SLO-1 made the nematodes highly resistant to alcohol intoxication. This mutation did not affect other behaviors dependent on the BK channel, indicating that the mutant channel retained its normal function in vivo. Patch-clamp recordings revealed that the human BK channel carrying the T352I mutation exhibited insensitivity to alcohol-induced activation (82). However, the mutation did not affect the average conductance and potassium selectivity of the channel, and only minor deviations in voltage dependence were observed (83).
In 2015, mutations in C. elegans were examined, focusing on disrupting the calcium-binding sites of the BK channel (SLO-1). A previous study yielded findings indicating that the presumed calcium-binding domains of the BK channel in C. elegans do not play a crucial role in the activation of the channel by EtOH or EtOH-induced intoxication (84). According to Scott et al (48), C. elegans exhibited notable behavioral deficits following withdrawal from chronic EtOH exposure, including reduced locomotion speed and altered movement patterns. Mutant strains lacking functional SLO-1 channels showed exacerbated behavioral deficits following EtOH withdrawal compared to wild-type strains. Overexpression of SLO-1 channels mitigated some of the behavioral deficits associated with EtOH withdrawal. The proper functioning of SLO channels is essential for average behavioral recovery, providing valuable insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying EtOH-related withdrawal effects (49,85).
In 2018, Chen et al (86) identified the GCY-35/GCY-36 and TAX-2/TAX-4 signaling pathways as mediators of acute functional tolerance to EtOH. Mutants with disruptions in these pathways exhibited impaired development of acute EtOH tolerance and reduced behavioral adaptation to EtOH, providing insight into the molecular and neuronal mechanisms of the exposure to EtOH. It is essential to mention that these pathways are involved in the oxygen sensory neurons, which affect the mechanisms through which nematodes respond to EtOH. According to the studies by Oh and Kim (87) and Oh et al (88), BK channels need to be organized into clusters to function correctly in the presence of EtOH, and mutations which disrupt the clustering of BK channels result in altered behavioral sensitivity to EtOH. These mechanisms involve proteins that facilitate the aggregation of BK channels into functional clusters at the neuronal membrane
The study conducted by Sterken et al (89) presented an extensive transcriptional profile of C. elegans in response to EtOH exposure. Their study indicated that genes associated with detoxification processes, including cytochrome P450 enzymes and glutathione S-transferases, were notably upregulated, implying that EtOH exposure triggers a detoxification response in C. elegans. It was suggested that EtOH functions as a stressor, prompting a defensive reaction within the organism. This was evidenced by the increased expression of genes linked to stress response, such as HSPs and other molecular chaperones (90).
Rodent studies. Rodent studies provide comprehensive insight into the genetic, neurobiological and behavioral aspects of the interaction of alcohol with BK channels (91). Mice can be subjected to genetic engineering techniques to induce the knockout of specific genes, including those responsible for encoding BK channel subunits. This method enables researchers to investigate the influence of these particular genes on alcohol sensitivity, tolerance and consumption. Additionally, mice can be manipulated to express mutated or human variants of genes, thereby facilitating the exploration of the functional roles of various BK channel subunits in response to alcohol (91,92). The first mouse study included in the present review is from 2002; the most recent one was published in 2024, as presented below:
In 2002, Knott et al (93) explored the processes that underlie alcohol tolerance in neuro-hypophysial terminals, focusing on the role of ion channel plasticity. This plasticity relates to the capacity of ion channels to modify their function following prolonged alcohol exposure. Marked alterations in both calcium and potassium channels were revealed as a result of chronic alcohol exposure. Specifically, the functioning of voltage-gated calcium channels diminished while the activity of BK channels increased. The observed plasticity in ion channels stabilized neurotransmitter release from the neuro-hypophysial terminals during chronic alcohol exposure, thereby ensuring the maintenance of essential physiological processes regulated by these terminals, such as vasopressin and oxytocin (94).
Subsequently, 2 years later, Pietrzykowski et al (95) used rat brain slices as the experimental model to study BK channels in CNS terminals. Their study identified two main components contributing to alcohol tolerance in BK channels: i) Decreased EtOH potentiation; and ii) decreased channel density (95). Chronic EtOH exposure reduced the ability of EtOH to enhance BK channel activity. This suggests a desensitization or adaptation of the channel to the potentiating effects of EtOH over time. In addition, chronic EtOH exposure reduced the number of functional BK channels in CNS terminals. These findings suggest that alcohol tolerance in CNS BK channels involves adaptive changes in channel function (EtOH potentiation) and structural changes (channel density). Understanding these mechanisms provides insight into the way the CNS adapts to chronic alcohol exposure and may inform therapeutic strategies for alcohol-related disorders (96).
Velázquez-Marrero et al (97) found in 2011 that the persistence of molecular tolerance to alcohol was markedly non0linear concerning the duration of the initial alcohol exposure. Short periods of exposure resulted in transient tolerance, while longer periods of exposure led to more persistent tolerance. Molecular adaptations in BK channels, including alterations in their phosphorylation state and interactions with other proteins, were observed following prolonged alcohol exposure. These changes contribute to the persistent nature of tolerance. Upon brief exposure to alcohol, a temporary tolerance is developed, which rapidly diminishes after alcohol consumption ceases. By contrast, prolonged exposure leads to enduring modifications in channel function, resulting in persistent tolerance even after alcohol is no longer present (97).
Magnesium (Mg²+) protects against the EtOH potentiation of BK channel activity. The presence of Mg²+ diminishes the potentiating effect of EtOH on BK channel activity, indicating a modulatory function for Mg²+ in the impact of EtOH on BK channels. Electrophysiological recordings have shown that in the absence of Mg²+, EtOH notably increases the likelihood of BK channel openings. However, this effect is mitigated in the presence of Mg²+, highlighting the interplay between Mg²+ and EtOH in regulating BK channel activity (98).
In 2015, Kreifeldt et al (99) concluded that the BK channel β1 subunit plays a marked role in the behavioral adaptations elicited by chronic intermittent EtOH exposure. The presence of the β1 subunit contributes to regulating anxiety-like behavior, EtOH consumption and locomotor activity in response to EtOH. Furthermore, Palacio et al (100) concluded that EtOH exerts time-dependent effects on the expression and trafficking of BK channels in hippocampal neurons. Acute exposure increases BK channel surface expression and activity, while chronic exposure results in a more complex regulation that decreases surface expression after prolonged exposure. These findings highlight the dynamic nature of the impact of EtOH on ion channel regulation and provide insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying the neuronal adaptations to alcohol exposure.
The 2024 study focused on the residue in the α subunit of the BK channel, specifically hypothesizing the significance of this residue in the EtOH modulation of the channel and the subsequent behavioral responses to alcohol. Upon comparing the effects of EtOH on both wild-type and mutant mice regarding the specified residue, Okhuarobo et al (101) found no substantial differences in their behavioral responses. This suggests that other residues or mechanisms are likely accountable for the effects of EtOH on behavior. Consequently, this calls for further exploration of potential sites or mechanisms within the BK channel or other molecular pathways implicated in alcohol responses (101).
Cell line studies. Cell lines provide a controlled and consistent environment for studying the effects of EtOH on BK channels. They can be genetically manipulated easily to express various BK channel subunit isoforms. Using a cell line allows for the application of electrophysiological techniques, such as patch-clamp recordings, to measure the activity of BK channels under different conditions. This provides detailed information about the way EtOH affects channel function depending on subunit composition (102).
In 2008, Feinberg-Zadek et al (103) investigated the influence of BK channel subunit composition on the acute effects of alcohol. The findings revealed that the β4 subunit reduces alcohol-induced potentiation, while the β1 subunit has an even stronger effect in diminishing the impact of alcohol on BK channel activity. Additionally, the β subunits markedly affected the channel's plasticity in response to EtOH. Specifically, channels containing the β1 subunit exhibited higher initial sensitivity to EtOH but developed tolerance more rapidly than those containing other β subunits (103). The same year, Martin et al (104) also presented an auxiliary protein, the β4 subunit, associated with the BK channel. Electrophysiological recordings revealed that BK channels containing the β4 subunit exhibited reduced EtOH-induced activation compared with channels without the β4 subunit. It opened potential avenues for therapeutic strategies targeting the BK channel-β4 interaction to address alcohol-related disorders. In addition, the gene that encodes the BK channel β4 subunit should be considered a potential candidate for evaluating susceptibility to alcohol abuse and alcoholism (105). This suggests critical functional consequences for alcohol tolerance, as subunit composition may influence how neurons and cells adapt to alcohol exposure.
According to Yuan et al (106), specific lipids such as cholesterol and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate, influence the response of the channel to EtOH. For example, cholesterol-enriched membranes exhibit a different acute tolerance pattern compared with cholesterol-depleted membranes. The authors found that lipid composition notably modulates the development of alcohol tolerance in BKCa channels (106). Specifically, the lipid environment around the channel alters how the channel responds to alcohol. When the lipid composition was changed, it influenced the degree of potentiation and tolerance to alcohol, indicating that lipids are essential in modulating the channel's functional response to alcohol. That study highlighted that lipids can either enhance or reduce the development of alcohol tolerance in BKCa channels. This suggests that lipids are not just passive structural components, but actively regulate the way the BKCa channel adapts to EtOH exposure (105,106).
Pietrzykowski et al (107) elucidated a novel mechanism through which chronic alcohol exposure leads to neuroadaptive changes in neurons. Their study provided insight into the molecular processes involved in alcohol-induced neuroadaptation by identifying microRNA (miR)-9 as a key regulator of BK channel splice variant stability. Increased levels of miR-9 were observed in neurons following chronic alcohol exposure. This post-transcriptional regulation allows neurons to adjust their excitability and function in response to prolonged alcohol exposure.
Using patch-clamp recordings, Sitdikova et al (108) demonstrated that hydrogen sulfide (H2S) directly increased the open probability of BK channels. The effect of H2S on BK channel activity was mediated through direct interaction with the channel protein rather than through changes in intracellular signaling pathways. This conclusion was drawn from experiments demonstrating that the effect of H2S persisted even in the absence of intracellular calcium changes. That study demonstrated that H2S notably enhanced the activity of BK channels in rat pituitary tumor GH3 cells in a concentration-dependent manner (108). The effect is likely due to a direct interaction with the channel protein, increasing its open probability. That study paves the way for further research on the mechanisms through which H2S may influence ion channels in different cell types and contribute to processes, such as vascular tone regulation, smooth muscle function and neuronal excitability (108).
In 2013, Handlechner et al (109) demonstrated that EtOH and its metabolite acetaldehyde could increase the activity of BK channels in GH3 pituitary tumor cells. Combining these two substances produces a synergistic effect, leading to a more pronounced activation of BK channels than either substance alone. Subsequebntly, 1 year later, Velázquez-Marrero et al (110) showed that the β4 subunit affects the way PKA and PKC modulate the BK channel activity in the presence of alcohol. Channels with the β4 subunit showed a different pattern of tolerance development, suggesting that this subunit modulates how the channel adapts to prolonged alcohol exposure. The β4 subunit alters the mechanisms through which the channel responds to alcohol and kinase activity, affecting its voltage and calcium sensitivity. These findings suggest that individuals with different variants of the β4 subunit may experience varying degrees of tolerance to alcohol, which has important implications for understanding AUD and addiction. Targeting the interaction between the BK channel and kinases could provide novel therapeutic strategies for managing alcohol-related behaviors (110).
The interaction between Wnt/β-Catenin signaling and BK channels in the context of alcohol involves a multifaceted relationship. Alcohol can modulate both pathways, and this modulation can lead to changes in neuronal excitability and synaptic plasticity, and potentially contribute to the development of alcohol-related neuroadaptive changes. The β4 subunit has been found to influence phosphorylation states of the BK channel, which in turn affects the mechanisms through which the channel responds to alcohol and its subsequent tolerance (110,111).
In the case of BK channels, kinase-induced phosphorylation alters the gating and conductance, which can affect the mechanisms though which the channel responds to stimuli such as alcohol. Kinases modify BK channel activity over time, including their response to alcohol. When alcohol is repeatedly consumed, kinase-mediated phosphorylation can alter the function of the channels, making them less responsive to alcohol. The interaction between kinases and BK channels could contribute to individual differences in alcohol sensitivity and the development of alcohol-related disorders such as AUD. Targeting the kinases involved in BK channel modulation may provide novel approaches for the treatment of management of alcohol addiction by either promoting or inhibiting specific kinase pathways (109,110).
In 2016, Velázquez-Marrero et al (111) demonstrated that alcohol-induced increases in BK channel surface expression are dependent on the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Inhibiting this pathway blocked the alcohol-induced enhancement of BK channels, which in turn affected neuronal excitability by altering membrane potential and firing properties. Alcohol exposure also led to the internalization of BK channels, a process mediated by Wnt/β-catenin signaling and requiring new protein synthesis. Increased β-catenin levels from alcohol exposure inhibited this internalization, highlighting the role of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in alcohol-induced neuronal adaptations and potential development of alcohol tolerance (111).
The 2024 study by Padilla et al (112) demonstrated that miR-9 binds to specific sites within the 3'UTRs of the BK ZERO isoform mRNA. This binding negatively regulates the expression of the BK channels by decreasing mRNA stability and inhibiting translation, potentially impacting understanding mechanisms underlying neuronal function and plasticity (113).
In another study, immunocytochemistry revealed that cells expressing the 2.1 3'UTR construct had markedly reduced BK channel expression when treated with miR-9, indicating responsiveness to miR-9. By contrast, cells with the 2.2 3'UTR or control constructs did not exhibit notable changes in BK channel expression upon miR-9 treatment, confirming their unresponsiveness (112).
Contradictory findings observed between studies
Some pro- and anti-tolerance evidence has been reported. Studies on Drosophila and mammals have suggested that BK channels contribute to the development of tolerance by altering neuronal excitability after alcohol exposure (59,64,66,76). Other studies have reported that alcohol inhibits BK channel activity, suggesting a role in acute alcohol sensitivity rather than in developing tolerance (68,73,77). Some studies have reported that EtOH directly enhances BK channel opening, increasing K+ efflux and leading to neuronal hyperpolarization (69,114). By contrast, other studies have demonstrated that EtOH reduces BK channel activity, leading to depolarization and increased excitability, which could impair the development of tolerance (56,62,71).
BK channels are heteromeric, composed of pore-forming α subunits and modulatory β or γ subunits, influencing channel sensitivity to EtOH. Channels with certain β subunits (β4) show increased EtOH sensitivity, supporting a role in tolerance. Other subunit compositions (lack of β subunits) show diminished EtOH effects or even opposite effects. Variability in subunit expression across tissues and species complicates the interpretation of the impact of EtOH on BK channels (73-79).
In Drosophila, BK channel mutations can enhance or suppress alcohol tolerance, depending on the mutation type and experimental conditions. In rodents, BK channels have been implicated in both promoting and impairing alcohol tolerance, depending on brain region and cell type. The diversity of findings across species and brain regions challenges generalizing results. Also, EtOH is reported to activate or inhibit BK channels transiently during acute exposure, with effects that depend on the concentration and duration of exposure (94,95).
Measured behaviors in fruit flies vs. rodents in EtOH use. EtOH tolerance
Repeated exposure to EtOH increases BK channel expression or alters functionality in fruit flies and rodents. In fruit flies, EtOH tolerance is associated with the upregulation of Slo gene transcription, which reduces the sedation effects over time. In rodents, specific β subunits modify the speed of EtOH tolerance development, with β1 subunit expression in smooth muscle and β4 subunit expression in the brain playing key roles (113,114).
Locomotion. In fruit flies, the Slo gene is the primary determinant of BK channel activity, as flies have a simpler genetic structure without extensive subunit diversity. Mutations in the Slo gene reduce EtOH-induced sedation and impaired locomotion, suggesting a direct link between BK channel function and motor control. In rodents, the β4 subunit of BK channels is particularly implicated in cerebellar neurons, which regulate motor coordination. Loss of β4 leads to exaggerated locomotor impairment following EtOH exposure, indicating a role in EtOH-induced motor deficits (115).
Withdrawal symptoms, such as tremors or hyperactivity, are observed primarily in rodents. The γ1 subunit of BK channels, found in brain regions such as the hippocampus and amygdala, modulates withdrawal symptoms. An enhanced expression of γ1 subunit is associated with reduced withdrawal severity, suggesting it mitigates hyperexcitability during EtOH abstinence. In fruit flies, withdrawal behaviors are less pronounced, but may manifest as increased locomotor activity post-EtOH exposure. Changes in Slo gene expression modulate these effects (116).
Behavioral sensitivity. The γ2 subunit in rodents enhances EtOH sensitivity by decreasing the threshold for BK channel activation. Mice lacking the γ2 subunit exhibit reduced sedation and tolerance. In fruit flies, behavioral sensitivity is directly linked to the phosphorylation state of the Slo-encoded α subunit, which modifies channel gating in response to EtOH. Comparing specific subunit compositions of BK channels across species reveals different regulatory roles. In fruit flies, behavioral changes are predominantly mediated by the α subunit encoded by Slo. In rodents, the presence and distribution of auxiliary β and γ subunits diversify EtOH responses, influencing behaviors like locomotion, tolerance and withdrawal symptoms (117).
The interaction of EtOH with BK channels indicates conserved molecular mechanisms across fruit flies and rodents, particularly in channel modulation and behavioral impacts. However, differences in neural complexity, channel subunit diversity and metabolic factors lead to distinct EtOH sensitivity and behavioral outcomes. These differences highlight the value of each model in studying specific aspects of alcohol tolerance and dependence.
Research on alcohol tolerance and BK channels is a developing field that merges neurobiology, pharmacology and genetics. Studies across various cell lines and animal models, including C. elegans, fruit flies and rodents, have indicated that alcohol modulates BK channel activity, influencing both acute and chronic behavioral responses to alcohol (117). Genetic variants in BK channel genes have been linked to differences in alcohol sensitivity, highlighting individual variability. Parker et al (118) suggested that similarities in alcohol sensitivity patterns between rodents and humans support the use of animal models as translational endophenotypes. Additionally, studies (119-121), including the one by Rinker and Mulholland (120) identified genes and pathways that affect AUD risk and treatment responses, utilizing genetically modified rodent models to explore the biological mechanisms behind the disorder.
The study by Yang et al (122) examined hispidol, a natural compound that influences behavioral responses to EtOH by acting on large-conductance calcium- and voltage-activated potassium BK channels. Hispidol targets the α subunit of the BK channel, potentially normalizing its activity affected by alcohol. In animal models, it reduced alcohol intoxication symptoms such as motor impairment and sedation, and alleviated anxiety-like behaviors during withdrawal. These findings suggest that hispidol may be a promising treatment for AUD, addressing both acute and withdrawal symptoms through its dual action on BK channels (122).
Addressing the challenges in translating preclinical findings to human studies is essential, highlighting the urgent need for further research to validate these targets in clinical trials. By modulating BK channel activity, it may be possible to reduce alcohol tolerance and withdrawal symptoms, helping individuals to reduce or stop alcohol consumption. In addition, this therapeutic angle is grounded in the focus of psychobiology on applying biological insights to improve mental health outcomes, highlighting the relevance of BK channels in developing new treatments for AUD.
The study by Pietrzykowski et al (107) provided key insight into the molecular mechanisms by which alcohol influences BK channel expression and function; however, it did not directly assess the behavioral outcomes associated with these molecular changes. Therefore, the connection between the observed molecular adaptations and specific behavioral manifestations of alcohol exposure or tolerance was not explicitly established within that study. Salkoff et al (123) discussed the structural modulation of BK channels, although with less emphasis on the effects of the lipid bilayer. The studies by Dopico et al (20,102,114) demonstrated the conserved roles of BK channels in EtOH responses across species and highlighted the way the surrounding lipid environment influences the effect of EtOH on BK channels. They uniquely highlighted the role of the lipid environment (cholesterol and phospholipids) in altering the impact of EtOH on BK channels. The studies by Dopico et al (20,102,114) highlight the conservation of EtOH-BK channel interactions across species and tissues, while other reviews have primarily focused on neuronal or vascular smooth muscle systems (107,123).
Limitations of the current literature
Current literature on BK channels and alcohol tolerance has made notable progress; however, several limitations need to be addressed. While studies have identified that BK channels play a role in alcohol sensitivity and tolerance, the precise molecular mechanisms by which EtOH interacts with BK channels remain unclear. For example, the exact binding sites or conformational changes induced by EtOH on BK channels are not yet fully understood. The role of different auxiliary subunits (such as γ2, β1 and β4) in modulating EtOH effects is still being unraveled, and their interactions are not yet well-characterized (20,23,24).
The majority of research has been conducted in rodent models, which may not fully translate to humans. Rodent BK channels may have structural or functional differences affecting their EtOH interaction. Although some behavioral outcomes such as sedation and tolerance are linked to BK channels, the connection between specific neural circuits, BK channel activity and complex behaviors influenced by alcohol such as addiction, withdrawal, or relapse is not yet well-defined (68,86,102).
BK channels do not operate in isolation, but interact with other ion channels, such as voltage-gated calcium channels, NMDA receptors and GABA receptors. The extent to which EtOH affects these interactions has not yet been extensively studied, leaving a gap in the understanding of the mechanisms through which BK channel modulation integrate with broader neuronal signaling. Although BK channels are implicated in EtOH sensitivity and tolerance, only a limited number of studies have translated this knowledge into clinical applications (102,114). The potential of BK channels as therapeutic targets for AUD treatment is promising, yet it remains underexplored. Identifying compounds that modulate BK channel activity without adverse effects remains a significant challenge.
In conclusion, BK channels modulate neuron firing rates by influencing the duration and frequency of action potentials. EtOH alters the function of BK channels, leading to changes in neuronal excitability and synaptic plasticity. These modifications contribute to the acute and chronic effects of alcohol on the brain, including the development of tolerance and dependence. EtOH interacts with BK channels by altering their gating properties and calcium sensitivity, resulting in adaptive neuron changes to maintain homeostasis when exposed to alcohol. These changes are associated with behavioral alterations observed in AUD, such as impaired motor coordination, sedation and the reinforcing effects of alcohol.
BK channels are a shared target of alcohol, rendering them a focal point for understanding tolerance across species. Studies on Drosophila and C. elegans provide insight into genetic and molecular mechanisms and mouse models bridge findings to mammalian physiology and behavior. Cell lines allow for mechanistic studies under controlled conditions. Targeting BK channels presents a promising therapeutic strategy for AUD. Modulating these channels could help mitigate the effects of alcohol on the brain, reduce tolerance development and potentially aid in the treatment of dependence. Ongoing research using model organisms and human genetic studies aims to uncover the detailed mechanisms by which BK channels contribute to AUD, which is essential for developing targeted interventions.
The present systematic review was limited to only two online databases and focused on articles regarding fruit flies, nematodes, rodents and cell lines. Due to differences in complexity and regulatory mechanisms, the findings in model organisms may not directly apply to human physiology. While cell lines offer controlled environments, they lack the complexity of whole organisms, limiting the applicability of the results to more complex biological systems. Even though a meta-analysis was not conducted and additional research is required, the present systematic review presents an overview of the implications of BK channels in alcohol tolerance on animal models and cell lines.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
Funding: No funding received.
Availability of data and materials
The data generated in the present study may be requested from the corresponding author.
Authors' contributions
VCB and LAI conceptualized the study. ROT, ARC and LAI performed the literature search and designed the study. ARC prepared the figures. LAI and ROT wrote the manuscript. VCB read and corrected the article. VCB and LAI confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. All the authors reviewed and modified the final manuscript, and all authors have read and approved it.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Echeverría F, Gonzalez-Sanabria N, Alvarado-Sanchez R, Fernández M, Castillo K and Latorre R: Large conductance voltage-and calcium-activated K+ (BK) channel in health and disease. Front Pharmacol. 15(1373507)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Sausbier U, Sausbier M, Sailer CA, Arntz C, Knaus HG, Neuhuber W and Ruth P: Ca2+-activated K+ channels of the BK-type in the mouse brain. Histochem Cell Biol. 125:725–741. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Bock T and Stuart GJ: The impact of BK channels on cellular excitability depends on their subcellular location. Front Cell Neurosci. 10(206)2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Ancatén-González C, Segura I, Alvarado-Sánchez R, Chávez AE and Latorre R: Ca2+- and voltage-activated K+ (BK) channels in the nervous system: One gene, a myriad of physiological functions. Int J Mol Sci. 24(3407)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Contet C, Goulding SP, Kuljis DA and Barth AL: BK channels in the central nervous system. Int Rev Neurobiol. 128:281–342. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Bukiya AN, Kuntamallappanavar G, Edwards J, Singh AK, Shivakumar B and Dopico AM: An alcohol-sensing site in the calcium- and voltage-gated, large conductance potassium (BK) channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 111:9313–9318. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Griguoli M, Sgritta M and Cherubini E: Presynaptic BK channels control transmitter release: Physiological relevance and potential therapeutic implications. J Physiol. 594:3489–3500. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Chang CP, Dworetzky SI, Wang J and Goldstein ME: Differential expression of the α and β subunits of the large-conductance calcium-activated potassium channel: Implication for channel diversity. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 45:33–40. 1997.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
McCoy MT, Jayanthi S and Cadet JL: Potassium channels and their potential roles in substance use disorders. Int J Mol Sci. 22(1249)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Wynne PM, Puig SI, Martin GE and Treistman SN: Compartmentalized β subunit distribution determines characteristics and ethanol sensitivity of somatic, dendritic, and terminal large-conductance calcium-activated potassium channels in the rat central nervous system. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 329:978–986. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Cannady R, Rinker JA, Nimitvilai S, Woodward JJ and Mulholland PJ: Chronic alcohol, intrinsic excitability, and potassium channels: Neuroadaptations and drinking behavior. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 248:311–343. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Scaplen KM and Petruccelli E: Receptors and channels associated with alcohol use: Contributions from drosophila. Neurosci Insights. 16(26331055211007441)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Large Conductance Calcium Activated Potassium Channel-an overview: ScienceDirect Topics n.d. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/pharmacology-toxicology-and-pharmaceutical-science/large-conductance-calcium-activated-potassium-channel. Accessed at August 28, 2024. |
|
Ghatta S, Nimmagadda D, Xu X and O'Rourke ST: Large-conductance, calcium-activated potassium channels: Structural and functional implications. Pharmacol Ther. 110:103–116. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Mulholland PJ, Hopf FW, Bukiya AN, Martin GE, Liu J, Dopico AM, Bonci A, Treistman SN and Chandler LJ: Sizing up ethanol-induced plasticity: The role of small and large conductance calcium-activated potassium channels. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 33:1125–1135. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Pantazis A and Olcese R: Biophysics of BK channel gating. Int Rev Neurobiol. 128:1–49. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
González C, Baez-Nieto D, Valencia I, Oyarzún I, Rojas P, Naranjo D and Latorre R: K(+) channels: Function-structural overview. Compr Physiol. 2:2087–2149. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Vergara C, Latorre R, Marrion NV and Adelman JP: Calcium-activated potassium channels. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 8:321–329. 1998.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Yang W, Singla R, Maheshwari O, Fontaine CJ and Gil-Mohapel J: Alcohol use disorder: Neurobiology and therapeutics. Biomedicines. 10(119)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Dopico A, Bukiya AN and Martin G: Ethanol modulation of mammalian BK channels in excitable tissues: Molecular targets and their possible contribution to alcohol-induced altered behavior. Front Physiol. 5(466)2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Ghezzi A and Atkinson NS: Homeostatic control of neural activity: A Drosophila model for drug tolerance and dependence. Int Rev Neurobiol. 99:23–50. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Bettinger JC and Davies AG: The role of the BK channel in ethanol response behaviors: Evidence from model organism and human studies. Front Physiol. 5(346)2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Martin GE: Bk channel and alcohol, a complicated affair. Int Rev Neurobiol. 91:321–338. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Knapp CM, O'Malley M, Datta S and Ciraulo DA: The Kv7 potassium channel activator retigabine decreases alcohol consumption in rats. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 40:244–250. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Crowley JJ, Treistman SN and Dopico AM: Distinct structural features of phospholipids differentially determine ethanol sensitivity and basal function of BK channels. Mol Pharmacol. 68:4–10. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Blednov YA, Ponomarev I, Geil C, Bergeson S, Koob GF and Harris RA: Neuroimmune regulation of alcohol consumption: Behavioral validation of genes obtained from genomic studies. Addict Biol. 17:108–120. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Lowe SA, Wilson AD, Aughey GN, Banerjee A, Goble T, Simon-Batsford N, Sanderson A, Kratschmer P, Balogun M, Gao H, et al: Modulation of a critical period for motor development in Drosophila by BK potassium channels. Curr Biol. 34:3488–3505.e3. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Shah KR, Guan X and Yan J: Structural and functional coupling of calcium-activated BK channels and calcium-permeable channels within nanodomain signaling complexes. Front Physiol. 12(796540)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Vetri F, Choudhury MSR, Pelligrino DA and Sundivakkam P: BKCa channels as physiological regulators: A focused review. J Receptor Ligand Channel Res. 7:3–13. 2014. |
|
Yang H, Zhang G and Cui J: BK channels: Multiple sensors, one activation gate. Front Physiol. 6(133183)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Gessner G, Cui YM, Otani Y, Ohwada T, Soom M, Hoshi T and Heinemann SH: Molecular mechanism of pharmacological activation of BK channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 109:3552–3557. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
You C, Savarese A, Vandegrift BJ, He D, Pandey SC, Lasek AW and Brodie MS: Ethanol acts on KCNK13 potassium channels in the ventral tegmental area to increase firing rate and modulate binge-like drinking. Neuropharmacology. 144:29–36. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Bodhinathan K and Slesinger PA: Alcohol modulation of G-protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium channels: From binding to therapeutics. Front Physiol. 5(76)2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Crowder CM: Ethanol targets: A BK channel cocktail in C. elegans. Trends Neurosci. 27:579–582. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Sacks JJ, Gonzales KR, Bouchery EE, Tomedi LE and Brewer RD: 2010 national and state costs of excessive alcohol consumption. Am J Prev Med. 49:e73–e79. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Hood LE, Leyrer-Jackson JM and Olive MF: Pharmacotherapeutic management of co-morbid alcohol and opioid use. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 21:823–839. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Seneviratne C and Johnson BA: Advances in medications and tailoring treatment for alcohol use disorder. Alcohol Res. 37:15–28. 2015.PubMed/NCBI |
|
Goldman D, Oroszi G, O'Malley S and Anton R: COMBINE genetics study: The pharmacogenetics of alcoholism treatment response: Genes and mechanisms. J Stud Alcohol Suppl. 66:56–64. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Rinker JA, Fulmer DB, Trantham-Davidson H, Smith ML, Williams RW, Lopez MF, Randall PK, Chandler LJ, Miles MF, Becker HC, et al: Differential potassium channel gene regulation in BXD mice reveals novel targets for pharmacogenetic therapies to reduce heavy alcohol drinking. Alcohol. 58:33–45. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Padula AE, Rinker JA, Lopez MF, Mulligan MK, Williams RW, Becker HC and Mulholland PJ: Bioinformatics identification and pharmacological validation of Kcnn3/KCa2 channels as a mediator of negative affective behaviors and excessive alcohol drinking in mice. Transl Psychiatry. 10(414)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Blednov YA, Ponomarev I, Geil C, Bergeson S, Koob GF and Harris RA: Neuroimmune regulation of alcohol consumption: Behavioral validation of genes obtained from genomic studies. Addict Biol. 17:108–120. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, et al: The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 372(n71)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
McGuinness LA and Higgins JPT: Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Res Syn Methods. 12:55–61. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Risk of bias tools-robvis (visualization tool) n.d. https://www.riskofbias.info/welcome/robvis-visualization-tool. Accessed at August 1, 2024. |
|
Hooijmans CR, Rovers MM, de Vries RBM, Leenaars M, Ritskes-Hoitinga M and Langendam MW: SYRCLE's risk of bias tool for animal studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 14(43)2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Shaw RJ, McDuffie JR, Hendrix CC, Edie A, Lindsey-Davis L, Nagi A, Kosinski AS and Williams JW Jr: Effects of Nurse-Managed Protocols in the Outpatient Management of Adults with Chronic Conditions Internet. In: Appendix D, Criteria Used In Risk Of Bias Assessment. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, 2013. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK241370/. |
|
Wang ZW, Saifee O, Nonet ML and Salkoff L: SLO-1 potassium channels control quantal content of neurotransmitter release at the C. Elegans neuromuscular junction. Neuron. 32:867–881. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Scott LL, Davis SJ, Yen RC, Ordemann GJ, Nordquist SK, Bannai D and Pierce JT: SLO channel function influences behavioral deficits following withdrawal from chronic ethanol in caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 206:1445–1458. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Bhandari A, Seguin A and Rothenfluh A: Synaptic mechanisms of ethanol tolerance and neuroplasticity: Insights from invertebrate models. Int J Mol Sci. 25(6838)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Kumar S, Ren Q, Beckley JH, O'Buckley TK, Gigante ED, Santerre JL, Werner DF and Morrow AL: Ethanol activation of protein kinase A regulates GABA(A) receptor subunit expression in the cerebral cortex and contributes to ethanol-induced hypnosis. Front Neurosci. 6(44)2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Wang Y, Wang X, Li H, Xu M, Frank J and Luo J: Binge ethanol exposure induces endoplasmic reticulum stress in the brain of adult mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 356:172–181. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Johnson JR, Rajamanoharan D, McCue HV, Rankin K and Barclay JW: Small heat shock proteins are novel common determinants of alcohol and nicotine sensitivity in caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 202:1013–1027. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Chen P, Tu X, Akdemir F, Chew SK, Rothenfluh A and Abrams JM: Effectors of alcohol-induced cell killing in Drosophila. Cell Death Differ. 19:1655–1663. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Ingólfsson HI and Andersen OS: Alcohol's effects on lipid bilayer properties. Biophys J. 101:847–855. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Davies AG, Blackwell GG, Raabe RC and Bettinger JC: An assay for measuring the effects of ethanol on the locomotion speed of caenorhabditis elegans. J Vis Exp. 9(52681)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Moore MS, DeZazzo J, Luk AY, Tully T, Singh CM and Heberlein U: Ethanol intoxication in Drosophila: Genetic and pharmacological evidence for regulation by the cAMP signaling pathway. Cell. 93:997–1007. 1998.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Ghezzi A, Al-Hasan YM, Larios LE, Bohm RA and Atkinson NS: s/o K+ channel gene regulation mediates rapid drug tolerance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101:17276–17281. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Devineni AV and Heberlein U: The evolution of Drosophila melanogaster as a model for alcohol research. Annu Rev Neurosci. 36:121–138. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Cowmeadow RB, Krishnan HR and Atkinson NS: The slowpoke gene is necessary for rapid ethanol tolerance in drosophila. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 29:1777–1786. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Cowmeadow RB, Krishnan HR, Ghezzi A, Al'Hasan YM, Wang YZ and Atkinson NS: Ethanol tolerance caused by slowpoke induction in drosophila. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 30:745–753. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Devineni AV and Heberlein U: Preferential ethanol consumption in Drosophila models features of addiction. Curr Biol. 19:2126–2132. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Wang Y, Krishnan HR, Ghezzi A, Yin JCP and Atkinson NS: Drug-Induced epigenetic changes produce drug tolerance. PLoS Biol. 5(e265)2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Colvis CM, Pollock JD, Goodman RH, Impey S, Dunn J, Mandel G, Champagne FA, Mayford M, Korzus E, Kumar A, et al: Epigenetic mechanisms and gene networks in the nervous system. J Neurosci. 25:10379–10389. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Wang Y, Ghezzi A, Yin JCP and Atkinson NS: CREB regulation of BK channel gene expression underlies rapid drug tolerance. Genes Brain Behav. 8:369–376. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Lonze BE and Ginty DD: Function and regulation of CREB family transcription factors in the nervous system. Neuron. 35:605–623. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Ghezzi A, Pohl JB, Wang Y and Atkinson NS: BK channels play a counter-adaptive role in drug tolerance and dependence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 107:16360–16365. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Berger KH, Heberlein U and Moore MS: Rapid and chronic: Two distinct forms of ethanol tolerance in Drosophila. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 28:1469–1480. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Krishnan HR, Al-Hasan YM, Pohl JB, Ghezzi A and Atkinson NS: A role for dynamin in triggering ethanol tolerance. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 36:24–34. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Ghezzi A, Al-Hasan YM, Krishnan HR, Wang Y and Atkinson NS: Functional mapping of the neuronal substrates for drug tolerance in drosophila. Behav Genet. 43:227–240. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Lebestky T, Chang JSC, Dankert H, Zelnik L, Kim YC, Han KA, Wolf FW, Perona P and Anderson DJ: Two different forms of arousal in Drosophila are oppositely regulated by the dopamine D1 receptor ortholog DopR via distinct neural circuits. Neuron. 64:522–536. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Li X, Ghezzi A, Pohl JB, Bohm AY and Atkinson NS: A DNA element regulates drug tolerance and withdrawal in drosophila. PLoS One. 8(e75549)2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Renthal W and Nestler EJ: Histone acetylation in drug addiction. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 20:387–394. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Ghezzi A, Krishnan HR and Atkinson NS: Susceptibility to ethanol withdrawal seizures is produced by BK channel gene expression. Addict Biol. 19:332–337. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Li X, Ghezzi A, Krishnan HR, Pohl JB, Bohm AY and Atkinson NS: A histone modification identifies a DNA element controlling slo BK channel gene expression in muscle. J Neurogenet. 29:124–134. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Roy S, Ernst J, Kharchenko PV, Kheradpour P, Negre N, Eaton ML, Landolin JM, Bristow CA, Ma L, Lin MF, et al: Identification of functional elements and regulatory circuits by Drosophila modENCODE. Science. 330:1787–1797. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Krishnan HR, Li X, Ghezzi A and Atkinson NS: A DNA element in the slo gene modulates ethanol tolerance. Alcohol. 51:37–42. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Treistman SN and Martin GE: BK Channels: Mediators and models for alcohol tolerance. Trends Neurosci. 32:629–637. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Katner SN, Bredhold KE, Steagall KB, Bell RL, Neal-Beliveau BS, Cheong MC and Engleman EA: Caenorhabditis elegans as a model system to identify therapeutics for alcohol use disorders. Behav Brain Res. 365:7–16. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Hulme SE and Whitesides GM: Chemistry and the worm: Caenorhabditis elegans as a platform for integrating chemical and biological research. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 50:4774–4807. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Kwon JY, Hong M, Choi MS, Kang S, Duke K, Kim S, Lee S and Lee J: Ethanol-response genes and their regulation analyzed by a mi-croarray and comparative genomic approach in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genomics. 83:600–614. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Bettinger JC, Leung K, Bolling MH, Goldsmith AD and Davies AG: lipid environment modulates the development of acute tolerance to ethanol in caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS One. 7(e35192)2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Davis SJ, Scott LL, Hu K and Pierce-Shimomura JT: Conserved single residue in the BK potassium channel required for activation by alcohol and intoxication in C. Elegans. J Neurosci. 34:9562–9573. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Johnson BE, Glauser DA, Dan-Glauser ES, Halling DB, Aldrich RW and Goodman MB: Alternatively spliced domains interact to regulate BK potassium channel gating. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 108:20784–20789. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Davis SJ, Scott LL, Ordemann G, Philpo A, Cohn J and Pierce-Shimomura JT: Putative calcium-binding domains of the Caenorhabditis elegans BK channel are dispensable for intoxication and ethanol activation. Genes Brain Behav. 14:454–465. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Shipston MJ and Tian L: Posttranscriptional and posttranslational regulation of BK channels. Int Rev Neurobiol. 128:91–126. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Chen YH, Ge CL, Wang H, Ge MH, He QQ, Zhang Y, Tian W and Wu ZX: GCY-35/GCY-36-TAX-2/TAX-4 signalling in O2 sensory neurons mediates acute functional ethanol tolerance in caenorhabditis elegans. Sci Rep. 8(3020)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Oh KH and Kim H: BK channel clustering is required for normal behavioral alcohol sensitivity in C. elegans. Sci Rep. 9(10224)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Oh KH, Abraham LS, Gegg C, Silvestri C, Huang YC, Alkema MJ, Furst J, Raicu D and Kim H: Presynaptic BK channel localization is dependent on the hierarchical organization of alpha-catulin and dystrobrevin and fine-tuned by CaV2 calcium channels. BMC Neurosci. 16(26)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Sterken MG, van Wijk MH, Quamme EC, Riksen JAG, Carnell L, Mathies LD, Davies AG, Kammenga JE and Bettinger JC: Transcriptional analysis of the response of C. Elegans to ethanol exposure. Sci Rep. 11(10993)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Johnson JR, Edwards MR, Davies H, Newman D, Holden W, Jenkins RE, Burgoyne RD, Lucas RJ and Barclay JW: Ethanol stimulates locomotion via a gαs-signaling pathway in IL2 neurons in caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 207:1023–1039. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Kreifeldt M, Le D, Treistman SN, Koob GF and Contet C: BK channel β1 and β4 auxiliary subunits exert opposite influences on escalated ethanol drinking in dependent mice. Front Integr Neurosci. 7(105)2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Butler A, Tsunoda S, McCobb DP, Wei A and Salkoff L: mSlo, a complex mouse gene encoding ‘maxi’ calcium-activated potassium channels. Science. 261:221–224. 1993.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Knott TK, Dopico AM, Dayanithi G, Lemos J and Treistman SN: Integrated channel plasticity contributes to alcohol tolerance in neurohypophysial terminals. Mol Pharmacol. 62:135–142. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Hwa LS, Chu A, Levinson SA, Kayyali TM, Debold JF and Miczek KA: Persistent escalation of alcohol drinking in C57BL/6J mice with intermittent access to 20% ethanol. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 35:1938–1947. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Pietrzykowski AZ, Martin GE, Puig SI, Knott TK, Lemos JR and Treistman SN: Alcohol tolerance in large-conductance, calcium-activated potassium channels of cns terminals is intrinsic and includes two components: Decreased ethanol potentiation and decreased channel density. J Neurosci. 24:8322–8332. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Kuntamallappanavar G and Dopico AM: Alcohol modulation of BK channel gating depends on β subunit composition. J Gen Physiol. 148:419–440. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Velázquez-Marrero C, Wynne P, Bernardo A, Palacio S, Martin G and Treistman SN: The Relationship between duration of initial alcohol exposure and persistence of molecular tolerance is markedly nonlinear. J Neurosci. 31:2436–2446. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Marrero HG, Treistman SN and Lemos JR: Ethanol effect on BK channels is modulated by magnesium. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 39:1671–1679. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Kreifeldt M, Cates-Gatto C, Roberts AJ and Contet C: BK channel β1 subunit contributes to behavioral adaptations elicited by chronic intermittent ethanol exposure. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 39:2394–2402. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Palacio S, Velázquez-Marrero C, Marrero HG, Seale GE, Yudowski GA and Treistman SN: Time-Dependent effects of ethanol on BK channel expression and trafficking in hippocampal neurons. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 39:1619–1631. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Okhuarobo A, Kreifeldt M, Gandhi PJ, Lopez C, Martinez B, Fleck K, Bajo M, Bhattacharyya P, Dopico AM, Roberto M, et al: Ethanol's interaction with BK channel α subunit residue K361 does not mediate behavioral responses to alcohol in mice. Mol Psychiatry. 29:529–542. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Dopico AM, Bukiya AN, Kuntamallappanavar G and Liu J: Modulation of BK channels by ethanol. Int Rev Neurobiol. 128:239–279. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Feinberg-Zadek PL, Martin G and Treistman SN: BK channel subunit composition modulates molecular tolerance to ethanol. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 32:1207–1216. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Martin GE, Hendrickson LM, Penta KL, Friesen RM, Pietrzykowski AZ, Tapper AR and Treistman SN: Identification of a BK channel auxiliary protein controlling molecular and behavioral tolerance to alcohol. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105:17543–17548. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Hyman SE, Malenka RC and Nestler EJ: Neural mechanisms of addiction: The role of reward-related learning and memory. Annu Rev Neurosci. 29:565–598. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Yuan C, O'Connell RJ, Wilson A, Pietrzykowski AZ and Treistman SN: Acute alcohol tolerance is intrinsic to the BKCa protein, but is modulated by the lipid environment. J Biol Chem. 283:5090–5098. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Pietrzykowski AZ, Friesen RM, Martin GE, Puig SI, Nowak CL, Wynne PM, Siegelmann HT and Treistman SN: Posttranscriptional regulation of BK channel splice variant stability by miR-9 underlies neuroadaptation to alcohol. Neuron. 59:274–287. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Sitdikova GF, Weiger TM and Hermann A: Hydrogen sulfide increases calcium-activated potassium (BK) channel activity of rat pituitary tumor cells. Pflugers Arch. 459:389–397. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Handlechner AG, Hermann A, Fuchs R and Weiger TM: Acetaldehyde ethanol interactions on calcium-activated potassium (BK) channels in pituitary tumor (GH3) cells. Front Behav Neurosci. 7(58)2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Velázquez-Marrero C, Seale GE, Treistman SN and Martin GE: Large conductance voltage- and Ca2+-gated potassium (BK) channel β4 Subunit influences sensitivity and tolerance to alcohol by altering its response to kinases. J Biol Chem. 289:29261–29272. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Velázquez-Marrero C, Burgos A, García JO, Palacio S, Marrero HG, Bernardo A, Pérez-Laspiur J, Rivera-Oliver M, Seale G and Treistman SN: Alcohol regulates BK surface expression via Wnt/β-catenin signaling. J Neurosci. 36:10625–10639. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Padilla KC, Monefeldt GA, Galán AG, Marrero HG, Lloret-Torres ME and Velázquez-Marrero C: BK ZERO isoform HEK293 stably transfected cell lines differing 3'UTRs to assess miR-9 regulation. PLoS One. 19(e0298966)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Gonzalez-Perez V and Lingle CJ: Regulation of BK channels by beta and gamma subunits. Annu Rev Physiol. 81:113–137. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Dopico AM, Bukiya AN and Bettinger JC: Voltage-Sensitive potassium channels of the BK type and their coding genes are alcohol targets in neurons. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 248:281–309. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Liu G, Zakharov SI, Yang L, Wu RS, Deng SX, Landry DW, Karlin A and Marx SO: Locations of the beta1 transmembrane helices in the BK potassium channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105:10727–10732. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Yan J and Aldrich RW: LRRC26 auxiliary protein allows BK channel activation at resting voltage without calcium. Nature. 466:513–516. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Gonzalez-Perez V, Xia XM and Lingle CJ: Functional regulation of BK potassium channels by γ1 auxiliary subunits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 111:4868–4873. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Parker CC, Lusk R and Saba LM: Alcohol sensitivity as an endophenotype of alcohol use disorder: Exploring its translational utility between rodents and humans. Brain Sci. 10(725)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Leger BS, Meredith JJ, Ideker T, Sanchez-Roige S and Palmer AA: Rare and common variants associated with alcohol consumption identify a conserved molecular network. BioRxiv: Mar 1, 2024 (Epub ahead of print). doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.26.582195. |
|
Rinker JA and Mulholland PJ: Promising pharmacogenetic targets for treating alcohol use disorder: Evidence from preclinical models. Pharmacogenomics. 18:555–570. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Zou SB, Weng J, Symons MN and Singh SM: Role of potassium channel gene Kcnj10 in ethanol preference in C57bl/6J and DBA/2J mice. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 33:394–399. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Yang W, Goh HJ, Han YT, Lee MH and Cha DS: Hispidol regulates behavioral responses to ethanol through modulation of BK channels: A novel candidate for the treatment of alcohol use disorder. Molecules. 29(4531)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |
|
Salkoff L, Butler A, Ferreira G, Santi C and Wei A: High-conductance potassium channels of the SLO family. Nat Rev Neurosci. 7:921–931. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |