|
1
|
Hall MJ, Levant S and DeFrances CJ:
Hospitalization for stroke in U.S. hospitals, 1989–2009. NCHS Data
Brief: 1–8. 2012
|
|
2
|
Evers SM, Ament AJ and Blaauw G: Economic
evaluation in stroke research: a systematic review. Stroke.
31:1046–1053. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3
|
Payne KA, Huybrechts KF, Caro JJ, Craig
Green TJ and Klittich WS: Long term cost-of-illness in stroke: an
international review. Pharmacoeconomics. 20:813–825. 2002.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4
|
Astrakas LG, Naqvi SH, Kateb B and Tzika
AA: Functional MRI using robotic MRI compatible devices for
monitoring rehabilitation from chronic stroke in the molecular
medicine era (Review). Int J Mol Med. 29:963–973. 2012.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
Twitchell TE: Variations and abnormalities
of motor development. Phys Ther. 45:424–430. 1965.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6
|
Grefkes C, Nowak DA, Eickhoff SB, et al:
Cortical connectivity after subcortical stroke assessed with
functional magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol. 63:236–246.
2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
7
|
Wang LE, Tittgemeyer M, Imperati D, et al:
Degeneration of corpus callosum and recovery of motor function
after stroke: a multimodal magnetic resonance imaging study. Hum
Brain Mapp. 33:2941–2956. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
8
|
Mintzopoulos D, Astrakas LG, Khanicheh A,
et al: Connectivity alterations assessed by combining fMRI and
MR-compatible hand robots in chronic stroke. Neuroimage. 47(Suppl
2): T90–T97. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
9
|
Murphy TH and Corbett D: Plasticity during
stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci.
10:861–872. 2009. View
Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
10
|
Chollet F, DiPiero V, Wise RJ, Brooks DJ,
Dolan RJ and Frackowiak RS: The functional anatomy of motor
recovery after stroke in humans: a study with positron emission
tomography. Ann Neurol. 29:63–71. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
11
|
Weiller C: Imaging recovery from stroke.
Exp Brain Res. 123:13–17. 1998.(In German).
|
|
12
|
Cramer SC: Stroke recovery. Lessons from
functional MR imaging and other methods of human brain mapping.
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 10:875–886. 1999.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
13
|
Cramer SC: Brain repair after stroke. N
Engl J Med. 362:1827–1829. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
14
|
Seitz RJ: Stroke recovery: the pyramid in
focus. Neurology. 74:276–277. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
15
|
Ogawa S and Lee TM: Magnetic resonance
imaging of blood vessels at high fields: in vivo and in vitro
measurements and image simulation. Magn Reson Med. 16:9–18. 1990.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
16
|
Amaro E Jr and Barker GJ: Study design in
fMRI: basic principles. Brain Cogn. 60:220–232. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
17
|
Smith SM: The future of FMRI connectivity.
Neuroimage. 62:1257–1266. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
Brodal A: Self-observations and
neuro-anatomical considerations after a stroke. Brain. 96:675–694.
1973. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19
|
Smith PS, Dinse HR, Kalisch T, Johnson M
and Walker-Batson D: Effects of repetitive electrical stimulation
to treat sensory loss in persons poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
90:2108–2111. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
20
|
Ietswaart M, Johnston M, Dijkerman HC, et
al: Mental practice with motor imagery in stroke recovery:
randomized controlled trial of efficacy. Brain. 134:1373–1386.
2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
21
|
Aisen ML, Krebs HI, Hogan N, McDowell F
and Volpe BT: The effect of robot-assisted therapy and
rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. Arch
Neurol. 54:443–446. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
22
|
Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Edelstein OL,
Diels C and Aisen M: A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation:
robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation. Neurology. 54:1938–1944.
2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
23
|
Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Edelsteinn L,
Diels CM and Aisen ML: Robot training enhanced motor outcome in
patients with stroke maintained over 3 years. Neurology.
53:1874–1876. 1999.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
24
|
Volpe BT, Krebs HI and Hogan N: Is
robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation a
realistic option? Curr Opin Neurol. 14:745–752. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
25
|
Volpe BT, Ferraro M, Lynch D, et al:
Robotics and other devices in the treatment of patients recovering
from stroke. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 5:465–470. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
26
|
Volpe BT, Ferraro M, Krebs HI and Hogan N:
Robotics in the rehabilitation treatment of patients with stroke.
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 4:270–276. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
27
|
Ferraro M, Palazzolo JJ, Krol J, Krebs HI,
Hogan N and Volpe BT: Robot-aided sensorimotor arm training
improves outcome in patients with chronic stroke. Neurology.
61:1604–1607. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
28
|
Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Stein J, Frontera WR,
Hughes R and Hogan N: Robotic therapy for chronic motor impairments
after stroke: follow-up results. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
85:1106–1111. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
29
|
Daly JJ, Hogan N, Perepezko EM, et al:
Response to upper-limb robotics and functional neuromuscular
stimulation following stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 42:723–736. 2005.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
30
|
Macclellan LR, Bradham DD, Whitall J, et
al: Robotic upper-limb neurorehabilitation in chronic stroke
patients. J Rehabil Res Dev. 42:717–722. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
31
|
Finley MA, Fasoli SE, Dipietro L, et al:
Short-duration robotic therapy in stroke patients with severe
upper-limb motor impairment. J Rehabil Res Dev. 42:683–692. 2005.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
32
|
Prange GB, Jannink MJ, Groothuis-Oudshoorn
CG, Hermens HJ and Ijzerman MJ: Systematic review of the effect of
robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after
stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 43:171–184. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
33
|
Khanicheh A, Mintzopoulos D, Weinberg B,
Tzika AA and Mavroidis C: MR_CHIROD 2: magnetic resonance
compatible smart hand rehabilitation device for brain imaging. IEEE
Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 16:91–98. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
34
|
Tsekos N, Khanicheh A, Christoforou E and
Mavroidis C: Magnetic resonance-compatible robotic and mechatronics
systems for image-guided interventions and rehabilitation: a review
study. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 9:351–387. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
35
|
Siekierka EM, Eng K, Bassetti C, et al:
New technologies and concepts for rehabilitation in the acute phase
of stroke: a collaborative matrix. Neurodegener Dis. 4:57–69. 2007.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
36
|
Mintzopoulos D, Khanicheh A, Konstas A, et
al: Functional MRI of rehabilitation in chronic stroke patients
using novel MR-compatible hand robots. Open Neuroimag J. 2:94–101.
2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
37
|
Cramer SC, Weisskoff RM, Schaechter JD, et
al: Motor cortex activation is related to force of squeezing. Hum
Brain Mapp. 16:197–205. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
38
|
Yu H, Sternad D, Corcos DM and
Vaillancourt DE: Role of hyperactive cerebellum and motor cortex in
Parkinson’s disease. Neuroimage. 35:222–233. 2007.
|
|
39
|
Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ and Krebs HI: Effects
of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a
systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 22:111–121. 2008.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
40
|
Mehrholz J, Werner C, Kugler J and Pohl M:
Electromechanical-assisted gait training with physiotherapy may
improve walking after stroke. Stroke. Apr 3–2008.(Epub ahead of
print).
|
|
41
|
Langhammer B and Stanghelle JK: Can
physiotherapy after stroke based on the Bobath concept result in
improved quality of movement compared to the motor relearning
programme. Physiotherapy research international. Physiother Res
Int. 16:69–80. 2011. View
Article : Google Scholar
|
|
42
|
Langhammer B, Stanghelle JK and Lindmark
B: An evaluation of two different exercise regimes during the first
year following stroke: a randomised controlled trial. Physiother
Theory Pract. 25:55–68. 2009.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
43
|
Xerri C, Merzenich MM, Peterson BE and
Jenkins W: Plasticity of primary somatosensory cortex paralleling
sensorimotor skill recovery from stroke in adult monkeys. J
Neurophysiol. 79:2119–2148. 1998.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
44
|
Aizawa H, Inase M, Mushiake H, Shima K and
Tanji J: Reorganization of activity in the supplementary motor area
associated with motor learning and functional recovery. Exp Brain
Res. 84:668–671. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
45
|
Jones TA and Schallert T: Overgrowth and
pruning of dendrites in adult rats recovering from neocortical
damage. Brain Res. 581:156–160. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
46
|
Boyd LA, Edwards JD, Siengsukon CS, Vidoni
ED, Wessel BD and Linsdell MA: Motor sequence chunking is impaired
by basal ganglia stroke. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 92:35–44. 2009.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
47
|
Ward NS: Mechanisms underlying recovery of
motor function after stroke. Postgrad Med J. 81:510–514. 2005.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
48
|
Hummel F and Cohen LG: Improvement of
motor function with noninvasive cortical stimulation in a patient
with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 19:14–19. 2005.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
