MicroRNA‑20a promotes the proliferation and cell cycle of human osteosarcoma cells by suppressing early growth response 2 expression

Introduction

Osteosarcoma (OS) is a high-grade malignant bone neoplasm, which has become one of the most common primary malignant bone tumors in children and young adults (1). The majority of failures of osteosarcoma treatment are due to resistance to chemotherapy (2,3). Thus, there is an urgent need to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms of OS and to determine an appropriate gene therapy strategy in OS treatment (4).

Recent studies have demonstrated that microRNAs (miRNAs), are small non-coding RNAs of 18–25 nt. They have the ability to regulate cellular processes, such as cell proliferation, apoptosis, invasion and differentiation, suggesting that they could be involved in cancer (5–7). Previous studies have found that miR-20a is upregulated in several types of cancer, suggesting that it may be pivotal in tumorigenesis and tumor progression (8–10). In the present study, the biological effects and the potential mechanisms of miR-20a in OS were investigated. The role of miR-20a in OS development was investigated by MTT and cell cycle assays. In addition, the present study explored the regulatory role of miR-20a on EGR2 in OS cells, and investigated its function in cell proliferation.

Materials and methods

Clinical specimens

Eight human osteosarcoma (OS) tissues and matched adjacent normal tissues (ANT) were obtained from patients with OS (age, ~49–63 years; 4 females, 4 males) at the Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University (Xi'an, China). This study was approved by the ethics committee of Xijing Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Tissue samples were collected during surgery, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored until total RNA or protein was extracted.

Cell culture

MG-63, Saos-2 and SW1353 human osteosarcoma cell lines and h-FOB human osteoblast cell lines were purchased from the Cell Bank of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China) and grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM, Gibco-BRL, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 100 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Cell lines were cultured in a humidified incubator at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air.

Plasmids, small interfering (si)RNA and transfection

For ectopic expression of EGR2, EGR2 open reading frames with 3′-UTRs were amplified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and subcloned into pEGFP-N1 using the following primers: Sense: 5′-CCCTCGAGATCCCAGGCTCAGTCCAACC-3′ and antisense: 5′-CCAAGCTTAGGTGTCCGGGTCCG AGA-3′ (Invitrogen Life Technologies). miR-20a mimic, miR-20a inhibitor and negative control (NC) were purchased from GeneCopoeia (Guangzhou, China) and transfected into OS cells using Lipofectamine® 2000 reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

For EGR2 depletion, EGR2-siRNA (SI04948762) and negative control siRNA were purchased from Qiagen China (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Transfection of siRNAs was performed using Lipofectamine 2000, according to the manufacturer's instructions.

RNA extraction and reverse transcription-quantitative (RT-q)PCR

For miRNA quantification, total RNA including microRNAs was extracted from culture cells and patient samples using the mirVana miRNA Isolation kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions, and then cDNA was synthesized from 5 ng of total RNA using the Taqman® miRNA Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The expression levels of miR-20a were quantified using the miRNA-specific TaqMan® MiRNA Assay kit (Applied Biosystems) by the 7500 Sequence Detection system (Applied Biosystems). The relative miR-20a expression levels after normalization to U6 small nuclear RNA were calculated using 2-[(Ct of miR-20a) - (Ct of U6)]. qPCR was performed using an SYBR kit [Qiagen China (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.]. The PCR reaction conditions for all assays were as follows: 95°C for 30 sec, followed by 40 cycles of amplification (95°C for 5 sec, 59°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 30 sec). The primers which were synthesized by a TaqMan® Gene Expression Assay (Invitrogen Life Technologues) were used as follows: Cyclin D1 (Hs00765553/m1) and p21 (Hs00159357/m1). Expression data were normalized to the geometric mean of GAPDH (Hs02758991/g1) to control the variability in expression levels and calculated as 2-[(Ct of cyclin D1 and p21) - (Ct of GAPDH)].

MTT assays and colony formation

For MTT assays, Saos-2 cells were seeded into 96-well plates in medium containing 10% FBS at ~3,000 cells/well. In brief, 20 μl of 5 mg/ml MTT solution (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to each well and incubated at 37°C for 4 h. After the incubation period, the medium was removed from each well and the resulting MTT formazan was solubilized in 150 μl dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma-Aldrich). The absorbance at 490 nm was measured in a Thermo Scientific Multiskan (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA).

For the colony formation assay, Saos-2 cells were plated into three 6-cm cell culture dishes (1×103 cells/well) and incubated for 10 days in medium containing 10% FBS. The colonies were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and stained with 1.0% crystal violet (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Haimen, China) for 30 sec after fixation with 10% formaldehyde (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) for 15 min. The number of colonies, defined as >50 cells/colony were counted under an inverted fluorescent microscope (MoticAE30; Microscope Systems, Ltd., Glasgow, UK). Three independent experiments were performed and the data was calculated using a paired t-test.

Cell cycle assay

Cells were harvested, washed twice with cold PBS, fixed in 70% ice-cold ethanol, and incubated with propidium iodide (PI) (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) and RNase A (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology), then analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACScan; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Each sample was run in triplicate.

Luciferase assays

To construct a luciferase reporter vector, the EGR2 3′-UTR fragment containing putative binding sites for miR-20a was amplified using PCR and cloned in the psiCHECK-2 vector (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA). These constructs (1 μg) were co-transfected with 1 μg control or miR-20a precursor into Saos-2 cells. Dual-luciferase activity assays (cat. no. RG027; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) were assayed 48 h post-transfection according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Western blotting

Protein lysates were prepared, the equivalent aliquots of proteins were electrophoresed on a 10% SDS/polyacrylamide gel (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Invitrogen Life Technologies). The membrane was blocked in Tris-buffered saline-Tween 20 (Institute of Biotechnology) supplemented with 5% milk (Institute of Biotechnology) for 2 h at room temperature, and then incubated overnight at 4°C with anti-EGR2 (1:1,000; cat. no. ab108399; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), anti-cyclin D1 (1:1,000; cat. no. ab16663; Abcam) and anti-p21 (1:1,000; cat. no. 2947; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Beverly, MA, USA). α-tubulin (1:500; cat. no. T9026; Sigma-Aldrich) acted as a protein loading control. Following incubation with secondary antibody (horseradish peroxidase-conjugated) for 2 h at room temperature, immunocomplexes were visualized using the Enhanced Chemiluminesence Advanced Western Blotting Detection kit (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 15.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical analyses were conducted by Student's t-test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

miR-20a expression is upregulated in OS tissues and OS cell lines

To investigate the role of miR-20a in OS development, the expression levels of miR-20a in OS tissues and OS cells were first evaluated by RT-qPCR (Fig. 1A). The results showed that the expression levels of miR-20a were upregulated in the OS tissues compared with in the matched ANTs, and all three tested OS cell lines had significantly upregulated miR-20a levels compared with the h-FOB human osteoblast cell lines (Fig. 1B). These results showed that miR-20a exhibited a crucial role in OS and suggest that miR-20a is significantly increased in OS and may serve as a prognostic marker for patients with OS.

Figure 1 Expression of miR-20a in human OS tissues and cell lines. (A) Relative miR-20a expression levels in 8 paired primary OS tissues and matched ANTs from the same patient were detected by PCR analysis. (B) RT-qPCR analysis of miR-20a expression in h-FOB human osteoblast cell lines and MG-63, Saos-2 and SW1353 OS cell lines. Experiments were repeated at least three times. Each bar represents the mean of three independent experiments. *P<0.05, compared with h-FOB. miR, microRNA; OS, osteosarcoma; T, primary OS tissues; ANT, adjacent normal tissues; RT-qPCR, reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

miR-20a promotes OS cell proliferation and cell cycle progression

As miR-20a was significantly upregulated in OS tissues and OS cell lines, it was investigated whether miR-20a promotes cell proliferation and the cell cycle of OS cells (Figs. 2 and 3). Saos-2 cells were transfected with miR-20a mimics, miR-20a inhibitor or the respective controls, both of them showed great transfection efficiency (Figs. 2A and 3A). The MTT assay showed that the cell growth rate was significantly higher in miR-20a-transduced Saos-2 cells than in miR-NC-transfected cells (Fig. 2B). Colony formation assays consistently showed that enforced expression of miR-20a significantly enhanced the number of Saos-2 cell colonies after 14 days of culture compared with the controls (Fig. 2C). By contrast, the cell growth rates and colony numbers of Saos-2 cells transfected with miR-20a-in were significantly lower than those transfected with NC (Fig. 3B and C). To determine whether modulating cell viability was a result of the cell cycle, flow cytometry was used. After 48 h transfection, miR-20a mimics decreased the proportion of Saos-2 cells in the G0/G1-phase and increased the proportion of Saos-2 cells in the S-phase compared with those transfected with NC (Fig. 2D). However, miR-20a-in increased the proportion of Saos-2 cells in the G0/G1-phase and decreased the proportion of Saos-2 cells in S-phase compared with those transfected with NC (Fig. 3D). These results showed that miR-20a promoted OS cell tumorigenicity in vitro.

Figure 2 miR-20a upregulation promoted OS cell proliferation. (A) Validation of miR-20a expression levels after transfection by PCR analysis. (B) MTT assays revealed that inhibition of miR-20a promoted growth of the Saos-2 OS cell line. (C) Representative quantification of crystal violet-stained cell colonies. (D) Cell cycle distribution in cells with miR-20a transfection. Each bar represents the mean of three independent experiments. *P<0.05, compared with NC. miR, microRNA; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; OS, osteosarcoma.

Figure 3 miR-20a downregulation inhibited OS cell proliferation. (A) Validation of miR-20a expression levels after transfection by PCR analysis. (B) MTT assays revealed that downregulation of miR-20a inhibited the growth of Saos-2 OS cells. (C) Representative quantification of crystal violet-stained cell colonies. (D) Cell cycle distribution in cells with miR-20a-in transfection. Each bar represents the mean of three independent experiments. *P<0.05, compared with NC. miR, microRNA; OS, osteosarcoma; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

miR-20a directly targets EGR2 by binding to its 3′-UTR in OS

It is generally accepted that miRNAs regulate the expression of mRNAs by targeting the mRNA 3′UTR. Bioinformatics analysis revealed that EGR2, is a member of a multi-gene family encoding zinc finger proteins and is crucial in the regulation of cellular proliferation and the cell cycle, as a putative target of miR-20a (11–13). Therefore, EGR2 was selected as a target for further analysis (Fig. 4A).

Figure 4 miR-20a suppresses EGR2 expression by directly targeting the EGR2 3′-UTR. (A) Predicted miR-20a target sequence in the 3′-UTR of EGR-2 (EGR-2–3′-UTR) and positions of mutated nucleotides in the 3′-UTR of EGR-2 (EGR-2–3′-UTR-mut). (B) Western blot analysis of EGR-2 expression in cells transfected with miR-20a or the miR-20a inhibitor. α-tubulin served as the loading control. (C) Luciferase reporter assay of the indicated cells transfected with the pGL3-EGR-2–3′-UTR reporter and miR-20a or miR-20a-in with oligonucleotides. *P<0.05, compared with NC. miR, microRNA; EGR2, early growth response 2; UTR, untranslated region; mut, mutant.

To determine whether miR-20a affects EGR2 expression, expression of EGR2 was detected in the Saos-2 cells, which were transfected with miR-20a mimics, miR-20a-in or the respective controls. Western blot analysis showed that miR-20a mimics markedly suppressed EGR2 protein levels in Saos-2 cells (Fig. 4B), while miR-20a-in clearly promoted EGR2 protein expression. To verify the effect of miR-20a on the inhibition of EGR2 expression, it was examined whether EGR2 is regulated by miR-20a through direct binding to its 3′UTR. EGR2 3′-UTR (wild or mut type) vector was cotransfected in Saos-2 cells with miR-20a mimic or miR-20a-in and then luciferase activity was measured. As shown in Fig. 4C, significant repression of luciferase activity was observed in Saos-2 cells cotransfected with pGL-3-EGR2 3′-UTR vector and miR-20a mimic, whereas miR-20a-in increased luciferase activity. These results, demonstrated that EGR2 is a target of miR-20a.

miR-20a alters the levels of proteins associated with proliferation and the cell cycle in OS cells

To investigate the mechanism underlying cell proliferation and the cell cycle, the effect of miR-20a on critical cell-proliferation and cell cycle related regulators cyclin D1 and p21 were analyzed. The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21 and cyclin D1 are two miR-20a targeted proteins that negatively (p21) and positively (cyclin D1) regulate control cell cycle progression and proliferation (14,15). As shown in Fig. 5, cyclin D1 mRNA and protein were upregulated in Saos-2 cells transfected with miR-20a mimic, but the levels were decreased in the cells transfected with miR-20a-in, relative to control cells. In addition, overexpression of miR-20a caused the downregulation of p21 (mRNA and protein), but upregulation in the cells tranfected with miR-20a-in. Thus providing further evidence that miR-20a is important in OS cell proliferation and the cell cycle.

Figure 5 miR-20a altered the levels of proteins associated with cell proliferation and the cell cycle in Saos-2 cells. (A) Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis of expression of cyclin D1 and p21 in Saos-2 cells. (B) Western blot analysis of cyclin D1 and p21 protein in Saos-2 cells. α-tubulin served as the loading control. *P<0.05, compared with NC. miR, microRNA.

EGR2 upregulation is required for miR-20a-in-induced proliferation of OS cells

To further investigate the role of EGR2 promotion in miR-20a-in-induced OS proliferation, the effects of EGR2 downregulation on OS cell proliferation were first examined. As predicted, western blot analysis verified that EGR2-siRNA effectively decreased the expression of EGR2 in miR-20a-in-transfected Saos-2 cells (Fig. 6A). Colony formation assays showed that EGR2-silencing and miR-20a-in-transfection in Saos-2 cells exhibited an additive effect on cell proliferation (Fig. 6B). These results demonstrate that direct EGR2 downregulation is required for miR-20a-induced OS cell proliferation.

Figure 6 EGR-2 upregulation is required for miR-20a-in-induced proliferation of OS cells. (A) Western blot analysis verified that silencing EGR-2 effectively decreased the expression of EGR-2 in miR-20a-in-transfected Saos-2 cells. (B) miR-20a-in-transfected Saos-2 cells after transfection with EGR-2-siRNA promoted cell colony formation. Each bar represents the mean of three independent experiments. *P<0.05, compared with NC. EGR2, early growth response 2; miR, microRNA; OS, osteosarcoma; siRNA, small interfering RNA.

Discussion

Growing evidence suggests that microRNAs exhibit crucial roles in development and in the progression of human cancers, such as OS (16–20). miRNAs are a large family of gene regulators that negatively regulate their target mRNAs in a sequence-specific manner (6,21). The effects of miR-20a have been described in numerous types of cancer cells (8,10). However, it was uncertain whether dysregulation of miR-20a was associated with the progression of OS. In the present study, miR-20a expression was examined in human OS tissues, the matched adjacent normal tissues, OS cell lines (MG-63, Saos-2, and SW1353) and h-FOB human osteoblast cell lines. It was demonstrated that miR-20a expression was markedly upregulated in OS tissues and OS cells, suggesting that miR-20a is important in malignant processes in OS.

Bioinformatic analysis revealed that EGR2, a novel member of the Egr family of genes encoding immediate-early transcription factors, is a target gene of miR-20a. Furthermore, direct binding of miR-20a to the 3′-UTR of EGR2 mRNA was observed and it was demonstrated that miR-20a overexpression suppresses EGR2 expression in OS cells, while inhibition of miR-20a increases its expression.

Given that EGR2 is key in the regulation of cell proliferation and the cell cycle (12,22) the effect of miR-20a on these processes in OS cells was investigated. Saos-2 cells were transfected with miR-20a or miR-20a-in to upregulate or downregulate miR-20a expression. It was demonstrated that ectopic expression of miR-20a enhanced the cell proliferation of Saos-2 cells. Conversely, inhibition of miR-20a inhibited cell proliferation. Using flow cytometric analysis, it was observed that miR-20a-transfected Saos-2 cells entered the S phase earlier and inhibition of miR-20a arrested cell cycle progression at the G0/G1 boundary. More specifically, to determine the potential underlying mechanism, the expression of cell proliferation and cycle-associated molecules cyclin D1 and p21 was investigated, the results showed that the molecular mechanism by which miR-20a promotes OS cancer cell proliferation was due to acceleration of the G1/S phase transition, upregulation of cyclin D1 and down-regulation of p21 in cells overexpressing miR-20a (23–25). Furthermore, EGR2-silencing in miR-20a-in-transfected Saos-2 cells exhibited a positive effect to promote cell proliferation, suggesting that direct EGR2 downregulation is required for miR-20a-in duced OS cell proliferation.

In conclusion, the current study revealed that upregulation of miR-20a is a common event underlying OS. Furthermore, miR-20a functions as an oncogene by directly targeting EGR2. These findings collectively suggest that miR-20a may serve as a promising prognostic and therapeutic target for OS.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Xijing Hospital.

References