Synergistic effect of kaempferol and 5‑fluorouracil on the growth of colorectal cancer cells by regulating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway

  • Authors:
    • Qiongyu Li
    • Lihui Wei
    • Shan Lin
    • Youqin Chen
    • Jiumao Lin
    • Jun Peng
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: May 27, 2019     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2019.10296
  • Pages: 728-734
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Combination chemotherapy with chemosensitizers can exert synergistic therapeutic effects, reduce toxicity, and delay the induction of drug resistance. In the present study, the antitumor effects were investigated, and the possible underlying mechanisms of kaempferol combined with 5‑fluorouracil (5‑FU) in colorectal cancer cells were explored. HCT‑8 or HCT‑116 cells were treated with various concentrations of kaempferol and/or 5‑FU for the indicated time‑points. An MTT assay was used to determine cell viability, whereas the synergistic effects were assessed by calculating the combination indices of kaempferol and 5‑FU. Annexin V analysis and Hoechst staining were used to determine cell apoptosis. q‑PCR and western blotting were performed to determine the expression levels of Bax, Bcl‑2, thymidylate synthase (TS), PTEN, PI3K, AKT, and p‑AKT. The combination of kaempferol and 5‑FU was determined to be more effective in inhibiting cell viability than either of the agents alone. The inhibition of tumors in response to kaempferol and 5‑FU was associated with the reduction in proliferation ability and stimulation of apoptosis. The protein results indicated that kaempferol and 5‑FU could significantly upregulate the expression levels of Bax and downregulate the expression levels of Bcl‑2 and TS. Furthermore, the combination treatment greatly inhibited the activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway, suggesting the involvement of this pathway in the synergistic effects. The present study demonstrated that kaempferol has a synergistic effect with 5‑FU by inhibiting cell proliferation and inducing apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells via suppression of TS or attenuation of p‑Akt activation. The combination of kaempferol and 5‑FU may be used as an effective therapeutic strategy for colorectal cancer.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major public health problem since it is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer resulting in mortality worldwide (1). Moreover, the incidence rates of colorectal cancer in developing countries, including China, have risen due to the growth of the aging population and adoption of westernized behaviors and lifestyles. Surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy are the main treatments for colorectal cancer. However, 40–50% of patients succumb to this disease due to recurrence, metastases, and drug resistance (2,3). In addition, severe side effects caused by chemotherapeutic agents lead to the deterioration of the quality of life of patients. Therefore, it is necessary to develop tolerable treatment strategies with increased sensitivity in order to improve the clinical outcome and overall survival rates.

The most widely used chemotherapeutic drug, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), is a first-line base treatment of colorectal cancer (46). 5-FU inhibits cancer cell growth and initiates apoptosis by inducing DNA damage during replication and hindering its repair. It could disturb the synthesis of the pyrimidine thymidine, a nucleoside required for DNA replication, and block the activity of thymidylate synthase (TS) (7). Although 5-FU treatment has been demonstrated to be effective for CRC, it is associated with severe side effects and acquired drug resistance (8,9). Therefore, further studies are required to identify agents that can increase the efficacy of 5-FU and reduce its side effects.

Clinically, patients with low TS expression in tumor tissues exhibit improved response to 5-FU-based therapy, indicating that TS expression may be involved in the development of 5-FU resistance. A previous study revealed that cancer cells acquire 5-FU resistance when stimulated with low doses of 5-FU for a prolonged period, which is accompanied by high expression levels of TS (1012). The results of these studies demonstrated that TS overexpression is closely related to the occurrence of 5-FU resistance (13). Thus, TS is not only considered to be a target of 5-FU but also an oncogene participating in 5-FU resistance (14).

Recent studies indicated that prolonged exposure to 5-FU could activate several signaling pathways, including the PI3K/Akt pathway, which is a major downstream effector pathway leading to chemoresistance (15,16). This pathway is involved in cell growth and drug resistance. Recent evidence indicates that activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway contributes to resistance to multiple cancer therapies and is deemed a poor prognostic factor for cancers (17).

Combination studies are widely used in treating dreadful diseases, including cancer (18), and aim to achieve synergistic therapeutic effects, minimize toxicity, and delay the induction of drug resistance. Several compounds from nature, such as medicinal plants, are pharmacologically safe and have been demonstrated to be potent chemosensitizers in combination with conventional chemotherapeutic drugs. Therefore, phytochemicals have a good application prospect in the treatment of cancer and adjuvant chemotherapy (1922).

Kaempferol is an ideal chemosensitizer owing to its diverse pharmacological actions and nontoxic nature. Fig. 1 illustrates the structure of kaempferol, which is known to exert antitumor effects in various cancer models (2326). However, no study has been conducted on the effect of 5-FU and kaempferol in cancer. The purpose of this study was to investigate the synergistic antitumor effects of 5-FU and kaempferol in CRC and elucidate the possible mechanisms underlying this effect.

Materials and methods

Chemicals and reagents

Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium, fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin-streptomycin, trypsin-EDTA, and BCA Protein Assay Kit were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. An Annexin V-FITC Apoptosis Detection Kit was purchased from Nanjing KeyGen Biotech Co., Ltd. TRIzol Reagent and PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit were provided by Takara Bio, Inc. 5-FU, kaempferol, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT), and the remaining chemicals used in the present study, unless otherwise stated, were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA. Primary antibodies for Bax, Bcl-2, TS, PI3K, Akt, and phosphorylated (p)-Akt and β-actin horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies were provided by Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.

Cell line and cell culture

The CRC cell lines HCT-8, HCT-116 and the normal human embryonic kidney cell line 293 were purchased from the Type Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The cells were maintained in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 unit/ml benzyl penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin in 5% CO2 and 95% air at 37°C.

Cell viability assay

The HCT-8 cells and 293 cells (6×103 cells/well) were seeded in 96-well plates and exposed to serial dilutions of 5-FU and/or kaempferol for 24 h. Then, MTT reagent (0.5 mg/ml in PBS) was added, and the cells were cultured for a further 4 h at 37°C prior to the addition of dimethyl sulfoxide. Absorbance at 570 nm was measured using an ELISA reader (Model ELX800; BioTek Instruments, Inc.). All assays were independently performed in triplicates. The cell inhibition ratio was calculated as follows: (Acontrol-Atreated)/Acontrol ×100%, where Atreated and Acontrol were the absorbance from treated and control groups, respectively. The IC50 values (dose of 5-FU and kaempferol required to inhibit cell growth by 50%) were assessed using nonlinear regression analysis.

Calculation of combination index (CI)

During the different dose combinations (ratios of IC50 as 5-FU: kaempferol: 2:1, 1:1, 1:2, and 1:4), the HCT-8 and 293 cells were treated with various concentrations of kaempferol and 5-FU; a new concentration-dependent curve was constructed using the MTT assay. In different combination ratios, we used the chessboard concentration dilution method to design drug combinations of different concentrations and then calculated the CI according to the dose-effect curve. The Chou-Talalay method for drug combination is based on the median-effect equation (27,28). Based on these algorithms, CalcuSyn was used for determining synergism and antagonism at all doses or effect levels. The CI was analyzed by CalcuSyn where values <1, =1, and >1 indicated synergism, an additive effect, and antagonism, respectively.

Identification of apoptosis by Annexin V/propidium iodide (PI) staining

The percentages of cells undergoing apoptosis with or without 5-FU and/or kaempferol were assessed by Annexin V-FITC/PI kit-based FACS (BD Biosciences). Cells were plated (3×105 cells/well) in a 6-well plate and then incubated for 48 h with 100 µM kaempferol or 50 µM 5-FU alone or in combination. Subsequently, the cells were washed twice with cold PBS and stained with Annexin V/PI before being analyzed by FACS, according to the manufacturer's instructions. All assays were performed independently in triplicates.

Hoechst staining

HCT-8 cells were grown in a 6-well plate and treated with 100 µM kaempferol and/or 50 µM 5-FU for 48 h. The cells were fixed in ice-cold 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min. Following washing with PBS, the cells were incubated with 1 µg/ml of Hoechst 33258 solution for 5 min in the dark. The cells were washed with PBS again and observed under a fluorescent microscope (DMI4000B; Leica Microsystems); the apoptotic cells appeared condensed and displayed fragmented nuclei.

Western blot analysis

Total protein extracts were obtained using lysis buffer and concentrations were determined by the BCA assay (both from Pierce Chemical Co.; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Equal amounts of protein (50 µg) from each sample were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to PVDF membranes (EMD Millipore). The membranes were blocked with 5% skimmed milk for 1 h at room temperature and probed with specific a primary antibody Bax (1:1,000; cat. no. 5023, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), Bcl-2 (1:1,000; cat. no. 4223; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), TS (1:1,000; cat. no. 5449; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), β-actin (1:1,000; cat. no. 4967, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), PI3K (1:1,000; cat. no. 4257; 1:1,000), AKT (1:1,000; cat. no. 2938; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), p-Akt (1:1,000; ser473; cat. no. 4060, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), PTEN (1:1,000; cat. no. 4257; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) overnight at 4°C. After being washed three times with TBST, the membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (1:25,000; cat. no. 31460; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) or rabbit anti-mouse immunoglobulin G secondary antibody (1:25,000; cat. no. 27025; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) at room temperature for 2 h. Following washing again in TBST, protein signals were visualized by an enhanced chemiluminescence reaction system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) and quantified using the ImageQuant software (Version 3.0; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). β-actin served as the loading control. All protein quantifications were normalized to their respective β-actin expression levels.

Statistical analysis

Three independent experiments were performed in triplicate. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Differences between two groups were analyzed using unpaired Student's t-test. Datasets that involved more than two groups were assessed with one-way analysis variance (ANOVA), along with the Tukey-Kramer test. A P-value <0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. Regular analysis was carried out using the SPSS package for Windows (version 17.0; SPSS, Inc.).

Results

5-FU and kaempferol cause greater inhibition of cell viability in CRC cells

Firstly, the cell viability inhibition potential of each drug was examined in the HCT-8 and HCT-116 cells. As anticipated, the growth of the cells was significantly decreased by treatment with kaempferol and 5-FU in a dose-dependent manner. The IC50 values of 5-FU and kaempferol were 177.78 and 350 µM, respectively, in HCT-8 cells and 77.63 and 184.33 µM, respectively, in the HCT-116 cells. The IC50 concentrations were then used to generate fixed ratios for subsequent combination studies and to calculate the CI. Among them, 50 µM of 5-FU combined with 100 µM of kaempferol exhibited synergistic anticancer effects on HCT-8 cells (CI value, 0.351; Table I), when compared with the effects of the two compounds used alone. Consistent results were found in the HCT-116 cell line (CI, 0.621; Table II).

Table I.

CI for different ratios of 5-FU and kaempferol on HCT-8 cells.

Table I.

CI for different ratios of 5-FU and kaempferol on HCT-8 cells.

Ratio (5-FU: kaempferol)CIEffect
1:20.351Synergistic
1:10.378Synergistic
2:10.808Synergistic
4:10.800Synergistic

[i] CI, combination index; 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil.

Table II.

CI for different ratios of 5-FU and kaempferol on HCT-116 cells.

Table II.

CI for different ratios of 5-FU and kaempferol on HCT-116 cells.

Ratio (5-FU: kaempferol)CIEffect
1:100.828Synergistic
1:50.621Synergistic
1:2.50.716Synergistic
1:1.250.895Synergistic

[i] CI, combination index; 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil.

The combination of 5-FU and kaempferol has no synergistic effect on 293 cells

The combination of 100 µM of kaempferol with 50 µM of 5-FU did not exhibit greater cytotoxic effects on the 293 cells (CI, >1) when compared with either of the two agents used alone (Table III).

Table III.

CI for different ratios of 5-FU and kaempferol on 293 cells.

Table III.

CI for different ratios of 5-FU and kaempferol on 293 cells.

Ratio (5-FU: kaempferol)CIEffect
12.5:252.852Antagonistic
25:501.574Antagonistic
50:1004.039Antagonistic
100:2000.895Antagonistic

[i] CI, combination index; 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil.

The combination of 5-FU and kaempferol exhibits greater inhibition on cell growth and cell viability

Microscopy was used to observe the cell morphology. Cells treated with 5-FU and kaempferol were crenulated, and the nuclei were dim (Fig. 2A). Cell viability was significantly lower in cells subjected to treatment with 5-FU and kaempferol alone when compared with that of the untreated control cells (Fig. 2B). These results indicated that combined treatment with kaempferol and 5-FU could inhibit the growth of HCT-8 cells.

Enhancement of 5-FU-induced apoptosis by kaempferol

To assess if kaempferol plus 5-FU could induce apoptosis, Hoechst staining and flow cytometric analysis were performed to detect cell apoptosis (Fig. 3A). Kaempferol combined with 5-FU treatment significantly induced cancer cell apoptosis in HCT-8 cells when compared with either of the two compounds alone. Although 50 µM of 5-FU and 100 µM of kaempferol induced 10.13 and 3.31% apoptosis, respectively, in HCT-8 cells, a combination of these two induced 31.41% apoptosis, which is almost three times that induced by 50 µM 5-FU (Fig. 3B).

Kaempferol combined with 5-FU upregulates the expression levels of apoptosis-associated proteins Bax, Bcl-2, and 5-FU metabolic enzyme TS

Apoptosis-related gene expression of Bax, Bcl-2, and 5-FU metabolic enzyme TS was detected by western blotting. The expression levels of Bax were higher in cells subjected to combination treatment when compared with those with either agent alone (Fig. 4). Conversely, the expression levels of Bcl-2 were decreased in the combination group when compared with single-agent treatment; TS expression levels were significantly decreased in HCT-8 cells when treated with kaempferol and 5-FU (Fig. 4). These results indicated that kaempferol combined with 5-FU exhibits synergistic anticancer effects by inducing CRC cell apoptosis and altering the expression levels of TS.

Role of the PI3K/AKT pathway in the synergistic effects of kaempferol and 5-FU

To determine whether AKT activation was involved in the synergistic effects of kaempferol and 5-FU, the levels of PI3K, PTEN, AKT, and p-AKT in HCT-8 cells were examined by western blotting. The p-AKT levels were attenuated in cells treated with kaempferol and increased after 5-FU treatment. However, PI3K and p-AKT levels were significantly lower in cells subjected to combination treatment when compared with 5-FU alone (Fig. 5). Thus, kaempferol and 5-FU may have synergistically suppressed CRC cell growth by inhibiting the activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway.

Discussion

Chemotherapy is considered as the most potent treatment option to improve poor survival rates in cancer. Although the combination of 5-FU, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan are being used in the clinical setting, their effects are not entirely satisfactory (2). The two main problems associated with chemotherapy are drug toxicity and the development of resistance of the tumor cells toward apoptosis. Thus, the combination of 5-FU with chemosensitizers could minimize the occurrence of side effects and maximize efficacy. Several synthetic chemosensitizers have been developed, but their cytotoxic effects and adverse pharmacokinetics have prohibited their use in clinical trials.

Hedyotis diffusa Willd is a major component frequently used in traditional Chinese medicine for the clinical treatment of CRC and is associated with drug resistance (29,30). Kaempferol is one of the main active components of Hedyotis diffusa and has been revealed to possess anticancer effects in several cancer cell lines both in vitro and in vivo (3136). Notably, they exhibit almost no or minor toxicity against normal epithelial, peripheral blood, and myeloid cells. In the present study, the effects of different combinations of kaempferol and 5-FU were examined; the inhibition rates were analyzed by the method described by Chou and Talalay. As revealed in Table I, the combined inhibitory effect of kaempferol and 5-FU (CI, <1) on the growth of the CRC cells was stronger than that of kaempferol or 5-FU alone. The following combination was used for further evaluations and comparisons in this study: kaempferol (100 µM) and 5-FU (50 µM).

The effect of kaempferol (100 µM) and 5-FU (50 µM) on apoptosis induction in HCT-8 cells was higher than that of either of the agents used alone. These results encouraged further evaluations into the mechanism of this synergistic effect.

It is widely accepted that the PI3K/Akt pathway plays an important role in drug resistance. Overexpression of this PI3K/Akt pathway has been identified in 5-FU-resistant cell lines, and the blocking of this pathway could sensitize cancer cells to 5-FU in vitro (37). However, activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway was revealed to induce 5-FU resistance in cancer cells (38). Furthermore, this pathway has a major function in cell proliferation and apoptosis. Apoptosis-related proteins, such as Bax, Bcl-2, and the 5-FU metabolic enzyme TS, are major downstream effectors of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway (39).

The intrinsic apoptotic pathway is largely controlled by proapoptotic (Bax) and the antiapoptotic (Bcl-2) proteins (40). In the present study, kaempferol combined with 5-FU decreased the expression levels of Bcl-2 and Bax when compared with kaempferol or 5-FU alone. Thus, based on the results of Hoechst nuclear staining, and flow cytometric and western blot analyses, the synergistic effect of 5-FU and kaempferol on apoptosis induction was confirmed. The formation of the apoptosome causes cleavage of procaspases (caspase family) which are responsible for activating effector caspases, such as caspase-3, which is a key protease of the apoptotic machinery and ultimately resulting in apoptosis (41). Among them, it is unclear how the synergy of kaempferol and 5-FU affects the caspase family and ultimately promotes apoptosis. In addition, it was also revealed that combination of 5-FU and kaempferol could arrest the cell cycle in the S phase, while the specific regulatory mechanism of kaempfetol is unknown. All of these issues rquire further study.

TS, a critical 5-FU-targeted enzyme, participates in 5-FU resistance in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. TS has been well accepted as one of the most important targets of 5-FU resistance (42). A previous study indicated that TS was dramatically increased following prolonged exposure to 5-FU (43). Consistent with previous research, the expression level of TS was increased along with the decrease in 5-FU sensitivity after 5-FU treatment in the present study. Additionally, TS levels could be downregulated by kaempferol; thus, kaempferol may increase 5-FU sensitivity by upregulating the expression levels of TS, thereby contributing to the synergistic effects of kaempferol and 5-FU.

In the present study, kaempferol combined with 5-FU demonstrated synergistic anticancer effects by inducing apoptosis and altering the expression levels of TS in CRC cells. These effects may have occurred via attenuation of the activation of p-AKT and suppression of the PI3K/AKT pathway.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

JP designed the present study. QL, LW, SL performed the experiments. QL, JL and YC analyzed the data. QL and JL and YC wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Glossary

Abbreviations

Abbreviations:

CRC

colorectal cancer

5-FU

5-fluorouracil

TS

thymidylate synthase

MTT

3-(4,5-dimethyl-thiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide

FBS

fetal bovine serum

FACS

fluorescence-activated cell sorting

SDS-PAGE

sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide minigel

DMSO

dimethyl sulfoxide

PI3K

phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase

AKT

protein kinase B

CI

combination index

References

1 

Miller KD, Siegel RL, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, Kramer JL, Rowland JH, Stein KD, Alteri R and Jemal A: Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 66:271–289. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

O'Dwyer PJ, Eckhardt SG, Haller DG, Tepper J, Ahnen D, Hamilton S, Benson AB III, Rothenberg M, Petrelli N, Lenz HJ, et al: Priorities in colorectal cancer research: Recommendations from the gastrointestinal scientific leadership council of the coalition of cancer cooperative groups. J Clin Oncol. 25:2313–2321. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Mody K and Bekaii-Saab T: Clinical trials and progress in metastatic colon cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 27:349–365. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Montagnani F, Chiriatti A, Turrisi G, Francini G and Fiorentini G: A systematic review of FOLFOXIRI chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: Improved efficacy at the cost of increased toxicity. Colorectal Dis. 13:846–852. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Kanazawa Y, Yamada T, Fujita I, Kakinuma D, Matsuno K, Arai H, Shimoda T, Ko K, Kato S, Matsutani T, et al: In vitro chemosensitivity test for gastric cancer specimens predicts effectiveness of oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Anticancer Res. 37:6401–6405. 2017.PubMed/NCBI

6 

Pardini B, Kumar R, Naccarati A, Novotny J, Prasad RB, Forsti A, Hemminki K, Vodicka P and Lorenzo Bermejo J: 5-Fluorouracil-based chemotherapy for colorectal cancer and MTHFR/MTRR genotypes. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 72:162–163. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Ghoshal K and Jacob ST: An alternative molecular mechanism of action of 5-fluorouracil, a potent anticancer drug. Biochem Pharmacol. 53:1569–1575. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Latchman J, Guastella A and Tofthagen C: 5-fluorouracil toxicity and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase enzyme: Implications for practice. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 18:581–585. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Papanastasopoulos P and Stebbing J: Molecular basis of 5-fluorouracil-related toxicity: Lessons from clinical practice. Anticancer Res. 34:1531–1535. 2014.PubMed/NCBI

10 

Wang W, McLeod HL, Cassidy J and Collie-Duguid ES: Mechanisms of acquired chemoresistance to 5-fluorouracil and tomudex: Thymidylate synthase dependent and independent networks. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 59:839–845. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Sigmond J, Backus HH, Wouters D, Temmink OH, Jansen G and Peters GJ: Induction of resistance to the multitargeted antifolate Pemetrexed (ALIMTA) in WiDr human colon cancer cells is associated with thymidylate synthase overexpression. Biochem Pharmacol. 66:431–438. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Peters GJ, Backus HH, Freemantle S, van Triest B, Codacci-Pisanelli G, van der Wilt CL, Smid K, Lunec J, Calvert AH, Marsh S, et al: Induction of thymidylate synthase as a 5-fluorouracil resistance mechanism. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1587:194–205. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Etienne MC, Chazal M, Laurent-Puig P, Magné N, Rosty C, Formento JL, Francoual M, Formento P, Renée N, Chamorey E, et al: Prognostic value of tumoral thymidylate synthase and p53 in metastatic colorectal cancer patients receiving fluorouracil-based chemotherapy: Phenotypic and genotypic analyses. J Clin Oncol. 20:2832–2843. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Rahman L, Voeller D, Rahman M, Lipkowitz S, Allegra C, Barrett JC, Kaye FJ and Zajac-Kaye M: Thymidylate synthase as an oncogene: A novel role for an essential DNA synthesis enzyme. Cancer Cell. 5:341–351. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Cassinelli G, Zuco V, Gatti L, Lanzi C, Zaffaroni N, Colombo D and Perego P: Targeting the Akt kinase to modulate survival, invasiveness and drug resistance of cancer cells. Curr Med Chem. 20:1923–1945. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Das D, Satapathy SR, Siddharth S, Nayak A and Kundu CN: NECTIN-4 increased the 5-FU resistance in colon cancer cells by inducing the PI3K-AKT cascade. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 76:471–479. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Xu J, Zhang S, Wang R, Wu X, Zeng L and Fu Z: Knockdown of PRDX2 sensitizes colon cancer cells to 5-FU by suppressing the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Biosci Rep. 37(pii): BSR201604472017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Das R, Bhattacharya K, Samanta SK, Pal BC and Mandal C: Improved chemosensitivity in cervical cancer to cisplatin: Synergistic activity of mechanism through STAT3 inhibition. Cancer Lett. 351:81–90. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Li CJ, Chu CY, Huang LH, Wang MH, Sheu LF, Yeh JI and Hsu HY: Synergistic anticancer activity of triptolide combined with cisplatin enhances apoptosis in gastric cancer in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Lett. 319:203–213. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Vinod BS, Antony J, Nair HH, Puliyappadamba VT, Saikia M, Narayanan SS, Bevin A and Anto RJ: Mechanistic evaluation of the signaling events regulating curcumin-mediated chemosensitization of breast cancer cells to 5-fluorouracil. Cell Death Dis. 4:e5052013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Lee YJ, Lee S, Ho JN, Byun SS, Hong SK, Lee SE and Lee E: Synergistic antitumor effect of ginsenoside Rg3 and cisplatin in cisplatin-resistant bladder tumor cell line. Oncol Rep. 32:1803–1808. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Bi T, Zhu A, Yang X, Qiao H, Tang J, Liu Y and Lv R: Metformin synergistically enhances antitumor activity of cisplatin in gallbladder cancer via the PI3K/AKT/ERK pathway. Cytotechnology. 70:439–448. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Li C, Zhao Y, Yang D, Yu Y, Guo H, Zhao Z, Zhang B and Yin X: Inhibitory effects of kaempferol on the invasion of human breast carcinoma cells by downregulating the expression and activity of matrix metalloproteinase-9. Biochem Cell Biol. 93:16–27. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Hung TW, Chen PN, Wu HC, Wu SW, Tsai PY, Hsieh YS and Chang HR: Kaempferol inhibits the invasion and migration of renal cancer cells through the downregulation of AKT and FAK pathways. Int J Med Sci. 14:984–993. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Huang WW, Tsai SC, Peng SF, Lin MW, Chiang JH, Chiu YJ, Fushiya S, Tseng MT and Yang JS: Kaempferol induces autophagy through AMPK and AKT signaling molecules and causes G2/M arrest via downregulation of CDK1/cyclin B in SK-HEP-1 human hepatic cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 42:2069–2077. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Feng J, Jin Y, Peng J, Wei L, Cai Q, Yan Z, Lai Z and Lin J: Hedyotis diffusa willd extract suppresses colorectal cancer growth through multiple cellular pathways. Oncol Lett. 14:8197–8205. 2017.PubMed/NCBI

27 

Chou TC: Synergy determination issues. J Virol. 76:10577–10578. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Chou TC: Drug combination studies and their synergy quantification using the Chou-Talalay method. Cancer Res. 70:440–446. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Li Q, Lai Z, Yan Z, Peng J, Jin Y, Wei L and Lin J: Hedyotis diffusa Willd inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis of 5-FU resistant colorectal cancer cells by regulating the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Mol Med Rep. 17:358–365. 2018.PubMed/NCBI

30 

Li Q, Wang X, Shen A, Zhang Y, Chen Y, Sferra TJ, Lin J and Peng J: Hedyotis diffusa Willd overcomes 5-fluorouracil resistance in human colorectal cancer HCT-8/5-FU cells by downregulating the expression of P-glycoprotein and ATP-binding casette subfamily G member 2. Exp Ther Med. 10:1845–1850. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Diantini A, Subarnas A, Lestari K, Halimah E, Susilawati Y, Supriyatna, Julaeha E, Achmad TH, Suradji EW, Yamazaki C, et al: Kaempferol-3-O-rhamnoside isolated from the leaves of Schima wallichii Korth. inhibits MCF-7 breast cancer cell proliferation through activation of the caspase cascade pathway. Oncol Lett. 3:1069–1072. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Luo H, Rankin GO, Li Z, Depriest L and Chen YC: Kaempferol induces apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells through activating p53 in the intrinsic pathway. Food Chem. 128:512–519. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Jo E, Park SJ, Choi YS, Jeon WK and Kim BC: Kaempferol suppresses transforming growth factor-β1-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and migration of A549 lung cancer cells by inhibiting Akt1-mediated phosphorylation of Smad3 at threonine-179. Neoplasia. 17:525–537. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Tu LY, Bai HH, Cai JY and Deng SP: The mechanism of kaempferol induced apoptosis and inhibited proliferation in human cervical cancer SiHa cell: From macro to nano: From macro to nano. Scanning. 38:644–653. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Wu LY, Lu HF, Chou YC, Shih YL, Bau DT, Chen JC, Hsu SC and Chung JG: Kaempferol induces DNA damage and inhibits DNA repair associated protein expressions in human promyelocytic leukemia HL-60 cells. Am J Chin Med. 43:365–382. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Song H, Bao J, Wei Y, Chen Y, Mao X, Li J, Yang Z and Xue Y: Kaempferol inhibits gastric cancer tumor growth: An in vitro and in vivo study. Oncol Rep. 33:868–874. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Ishida K, Ito C, Ohmori Y, Kume K, Sato KA, Koizumi Y, Konta A, Iwaya T, Nukatsuka M, Kobunai T, et al: Inhibition of PI3K suppresses propagation of drug-tolerant cancer cell subpopulations enriched by 5-fluorouracil. Sci Rep. 7:22622017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Kim EJ, Kang GJ, Kang JI, Boo HJ, Hyun JW, Koh YS, Chang WY, Kim YR, Kwon JM, Maeng YH, et al: Over-activation of AKT signaling leading to 5-Fluorouracil resistance in SNU-C5/5-FU cells. Oncotarget. 9:19911–19928. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Nagaraju GP, Alese OB, Landry J, Diaz R and El-Rayes BF: HSP90 inhibition downregulates thymidylate synthase and sensitizes colorectal cancer cell lines to the effect of 5FU-based chemotherapy. Oncotarget. 5:9980–9991. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Kang MH and Reynolds CP: Bcl-2 inhibitors: Targeting mitochondrial apoptotic pathways in cancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 15:1126–1132. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Larsen BD and Sørensen CS: The caspase-activated DNase: Apoptosis and beyond. FEBS J. 284:1160–1170. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Jiang B, Liu F, Liu Z, Zhang T and Hua D: B7-H3 increases thymidylate synthase expression via the PI3k-Akt pathway. Tumor Biol. 37:9465–9472. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar

43 

Milczarek M, Rossowska J, Klopotowska D, Stachowicz M, Kutner A and Wietrzyk J: Tacalcitol increases the sensitivity of colorectal cancer cells to 5-fluorouracil by downregulating the thymidylate synthase. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 190:139–151. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

July-2019
Volume 20 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Li Q, Wei L, Lin S, Chen Y, Lin J and Peng J: Synergistic effect of kaempferol and 5‑fluorouracil on the growth of colorectal cancer cells by regulating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Mol Med Rep 20: 728-734, 2019
APA
Li, Q., Wei, L., Lin, S., Chen, Y., Lin, J., & Peng, J. (2019). Synergistic effect of kaempferol and 5‑fluorouracil on the growth of colorectal cancer cells by regulating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Molecular Medicine Reports, 20, 728-734. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2019.10296
MLA
Li, Q., Wei, L., Lin, S., Chen, Y., Lin, J., Peng, J."Synergistic effect of kaempferol and 5‑fluorouracil on the growth of colorectal cancer cells by regulating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway". Molecular Medicine Reports 20.1 (2019): 728-734.
Chicago
Li, Q., Wei, L., Lin, S., Chen, Y., Lin, J., Peng, J."Synergistic effect of kaempferol and 5‑fluorouracil on the growth of colorectal cancer cells by regulating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway". Molecular Medicine Reports 20, no. 1 (2019): 728-734. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2019.10296