This article is mentioned in:

Introduction

Hearing loss ranks fourth among the principal causes of disability worldwide and leads to impaired communication, social isolation and reduced quality of life (1). Hearing loss is a common sensory disorder that results from genetic and environmental factors, including genetic mutations, ototoxic drugs, noise exposure and ageing (2). These physicochemical or pathological factors could induce the damage or loss of human inner ear hair cells (3). Currently, the most common therapy for sensorineural hearing loss is hearing rehabilitation with hearing devices; however, the sound quality perceived is not as good as with the original cochlea (4). Sensory hair cells are located in the organ of Corti and act as mechanosensory cells (5). Mammalian auditory hair cells cannot self-regenerate; therefore, the hearing loss caused by hair cell loss is permanent (6). Regeneration of cochlear hair cells has been considered a promising treatment approach for noise-induced sensorineural hearing loss and age-related hearing loss (7,8). It was demonstrated that cochlear progenitor cells (CPCs) can differentiate into either sensory hair cells or supporting cells, whose number is the determinant factor of the final length of the cochlea (9), indicating that manipulation of progenitor cells could be considered as a key point for hair cell regeneration. Further investigation on the mechanism of CPC proliferation is therefore required.

Any dysregulation of microRNA (miRNA) in the cochlea is likely to damage the structure of the auditory system and cause hearing loss (10). For instance, it has been reported that an increase in miR-34a level is associated with increased hearing threshold and a larger loss of hair cells in the cochlea (11). However, the impact of dysregulated miRNAs on the biological functions of CPCs remains unclear. In retinal progenitors, miR-125 has been reported to be expressed, but its expression is altered over the developmental period (12). Furthermore, miR-125 significantly suppresses the proliferation of cardiac progenitor cells during hypoxia (13). However, the expression and function of miR-125 in CPCs remain unclear. It has been reported that cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) activity could determine whether eukaryotic cells enter the next cell cycle or enter a transient G0-like state at the end of mitosis (14), suggesting the pivotal role of CDK2 in cell biological functions. Further investigating the effects of the miR-125/CDK2 axis on the biological process of CPCs is therefore required.

The present study aimed to identify the expression levels and function of miR-125 in CPCs and to elucidate the potential mechanism by which miR-125 regulates the proliferation of CPCs. Identifying the role and underlying mechanism of miR-125 in CPC proliferation may provide novel insights towards the regeneration of hair cells and treatment of hearing loss.

Materials and methods

Ethical statement

Animal experiments were approved by the local Ethics Committee of Hunan Provincial People's Hospital. All animals were cared for according to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals [National Institutes of Health (NIH); version 8, 2011].

Animals

Neonatal rats (0–3 days old) were purchased from Shanghai Model Organisms Center, Inc. and housed under specific pathogen-free conditions at humidity of 60–65%.

Isolation and culture of CPCs

After being intraperitoneally anaesthetized by 2% pentobarbital sodium (40 mg/kg), the neonatal rats were sterilized in 75% ethanol and sacrificed by decapitation. The bilateral temporal bones were obtained and then placed in precooled (4°C) °normal saline. The cochlear and spiral ligaments were removed by microdissection. After being washed with Hank's balanced salt solution (HBSS; HyClone; GE Healthcare Life Sciences) twice, cochlear tissues were cut into pieces (0.5 mm3). Then, the tissues were digested by 0.125% tryptase at 37°C for 20 min, during which the tissues were flipped every 5 min using a fire-polished Pasteur pipet. Subsequently, 10% foetal calf serum (FCS, HyClone; GE Healthcare Life Sciences) was added for 5 min to terminate the digestion at room temperature. Eventually, samples were centrifuged at 111 × g for 5 min at room temperature. The supernatant was discarded and the pellets were washed with HBSS twice. DMEM/F12 (HyClone; GE Healthcare Life Sciences) containing B27 (1:50) and N2 (1:100; both Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) was used to resuspend cells that were filtered using a 100-mesh copper net (pore size, 70 µm). A single cell suspension was prepared using DMEM/F12 supplemented with epidermal growth factor (20 ng/ml), basic fibroblast growth factor (20 ng/ml) and penicillin (100 U/ml) (PeproTech China). Living cells (5×105 ml) were placed in 24-well plates and cultured at 37°C in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2. The culture medium was replaced every other day. Cells were passaged every 5 days at a density of 5×105/ml. Cells used for in vitro differentiation were subjected to suspension culture at 37°C for 3 days. Then, the culture medium was replaced with the aforementioned culture medium containing 10% FCS. Afterwards, the cells were further cultured at 37°C for 12 days to induce differentiation.

In vitro differentiation of rat CPCs

The 3rd generation of CPCs was cultured for 4 days, then the CPCs were centrifuged at 88 × g for 10 min at room temperature. Supernatant was removed and cells were resuspended in DMEM/F12 containing 10% FCS. Cells (1×104) were incubated in culture dishes that contained polylysine-encased coverslips at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 12 h. Once cells had adhered, the supernatant was discarded and the medium was replaced. Half of the medium was replaced every other day until the seventh day. The medium consisted of DMEM/F12 solution, 100 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin, 2% B27 and 2% N2.

Cell proliferation evaluation by MTT assay

Cells (1×106/ml) in different growth phases were seeded in a 96-well plate (100 µl/well) and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2. Then, cells were incubated with 10 µl of 5 mg/ml MTT (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) for 4 h at 37°C. Subsequently, the MTT solution was discarded and 20% sodium dodecyl sulphate (100 µl/well) was added to the cells for 4 h at 37°C with 5% CO2 to terminate the reaction. The absorbance was read at 570 nm using a microplate reader (SpectraMax 190; Molecular Devices, LLC).

Cell transfection

After incubation for 2 days, CPCs were transfected with miR-125 mimic (50 nM), miR-125 inhibitor (50 nM), small interfering (si)-CDK2 (2 µg) or the corresponding negative controls (NC mimic, NC inhibitor or si-NC) or were co-transfected with miR-125 inhibitor + si-CDK2 (all Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd.) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The sequences were as follows: miR-125 mimic, forward 5′-ACAAGUCAGGUUCUUGGGACCU-3′, reverse 3′-UGUUCAGUCCAAGAACCCUGGA-5′; mimic NC, forward 5′-ACACGUCAGCAUUAACUCCUUG-3′, reverse 3′-UGUGCAGUCGUAAUUGAGGAAC-5′; miR-125 inhibitor 5′-UGUUCAGUCCAAGAACCCUGGA-3′; inhibitor NC, 5′-ACUGCCAUCUAUCUCGGAACGA-3′; si-CDK2, GGTGTACCCAGTACTGCCA; si-NCGACTTCATAAGGCGATGC. Cell transfection was performed for 48 h at room temperature, after which cells were cultured at 37°C for 48 h before subsequent experiments.

Immunofluorescence

Cells were collected and resuspended in culture medium containing 10% FCS. Cells were then seeded onto polylysine-treated coverslips at a density of 1×105 and incubated at 5% CO2 and 37°C. Following incubation for 24 h, the cells used for identification of CPCs and differentiation were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at room temperature and washed with PBS three times. Subsequently, cells were incubated with 1% Triton X-100 on ice for 5 min, washed with PBS three times and blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (cat. no. ST025; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) diluted in PBS. The blocking buffer was discarded and cells were incubated with primary antibodies against nestin (1:100; cat. no. MAB353; EMD Millipore), BrdU (1:500; cat. no. MAB4072; EMD Millipore) and myosin VIIA (1:100; cat. no. Ab150386; Abcam) at 4°C overnight. Subsequently, cells were washed with PBS three times and incubated with Cy3-labelled secondary antibody IgG (1:100; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) at 37°C for 30 min. The nuclei were stained with DAPI (5 µg/ml; cat. no. C1002; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) at room temperature for 5 min. After being washed with PBS three times, cells were visualized and imaged under a fluorescence microscope (magnification, ×400; Olympus BX51; Olympus Corporation).

Cell cycle analysis

Cells were washed with ice-cold PBS three times and centrifuged at 1,000 × g at room temperature for 5 min. Cells were suspended in ice-cold PBS and fixed in absolute ethanol for 30 min at 4°C. The ethanol was discarded after incubation and cells were washed with PBS to remove the residual ethanol. Subsequently, cells were resuspended in PBS with 3 µl RNAse (cat. no. ST578; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. Eventually, cells were stained with propidium iodide (PI; 50 µg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) for 30 min at 37°C. Cell cycle distribution was detected by flow cytometry and data were analyzed using CellQuest Pro software version 5.1 (FACSCalibur; Becton, Dickinson and Company).

Reverse transcription quantitative (RT-q) PCR

CPCs were lysed in 1 ml TRIzol® (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), and total RNA was extracted according to the manufacturer's instructions. Following RNA quantification, cDNA was obtained by reverse transcription using BeyoRT™ II and cDNA synthesis kit (cat. no. D7168M; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology), and then subjected to RT-qPCR using a Quanti Fast SYBR® Green PCR kit (Qiagen, Inc.). The procedures were performed as follows: 40 cycles of pre-degradation at 95°C for 2 min, degradation at 95°C for 10 sec, annealing at 60°C for 40 sec and extension at 72°C for 20 sec. Each experiment was repeated three times. The relative expression levels were normalized to endogenous controls GAPDH or U6 (for endogenous normalization for miRNA) and were expressed as 2−ΔΔCq (15). The sequences of the primers used are presented in Table I.

Table I. Sequences of the primers used for reverse transcription quantitative PCR.

Table I.

Sequences of the primers used for reverse transcription quantitative PCR.

Name	Primer sequence (5′→3′)
miR-125
Forward	TCCAGGGTTCTTGGAC
Reverse	GCAGGGTCCGAGGTATTC
CDK2
Forward	TGCCCTTTCACTGCCTATGG
Reverse	GAGGAAAGCCAAGACCCACA
PCNA
Forward	CTCCTCATCCTTGCGTCCTCATAT
Reverse	GAGGCACTTGGCAATGTATTCGATAT
Nestin
Forward	ATCTACACATACACGGGTTCCA
Reverse	TTCTTCTTCTCCTCCTCATTCA
U6
Forward	CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA
Reverse	AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT
GAPDH
Forward	TCTTGTGCAGTGCCAGCCT
Reverse	TGAGGTCAATGAAGGGGTCG

[i] CDK2, cyclin-dependent kinase 2; PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen.

Western blotting

CPCs were lysed using RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) on ice and the proteins were quantified using bicinchoninic acid (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). Proteins (50 µg/lane) were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto PVDF membranes. Subsequently, the membranes were blocked with Tris buffer containing 5% non-fat milk at room temperature for 1 h and incubated with primary antibodies against GAPDH (1:10,000; cat. no. ab181602; Abcam), CDK2 (1:1,000; cat. no. ab32147; Abcam), proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA; 1:1,000; ab92552; Abcam), nestin (1:1,000; cat. no. ab6142; Abcam) and β-catenin (1:5,000; cat. no. ab32572; Abcam) at 4°C overnight. Membranes were washed with PBST (10% Tween-20) three times and were incubated with goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:5,000; cat. no. CW0103S; CoWin Biosciences) or goat anti-rat IgG (1:2,000; cat. no. ab205719; Abcam) secondary antibodies at room temperature for 30 min. Membranes were washed with PBST four times and enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (cat. no. CW0049S; CoWin Biosciences) was used to detect the signal on the membrane using a chemiluminescence imaging system (GE Healthcare). ImageJ software (version 1.46; NIH) was used to analyze protein bands.

Dual luciferase reporter assay

TargetScan (targetscan.org/vert_72/) was used to predict the binding sites between miR-125 and CDK2. According to the prediction, wild-type (wt) and mutant (mut)-type sequences of the binding sites between miR-125 and CDK2 were synthesized and cloned into the reporter vectors (pGL3-Basic, Promega Corporation), which were named mut-CDK2 and wt-CDK2. 293T cells (American Type Culture Collection) were co-transfected with mut-CDK2 or wt-CDK2 and miR-125 mimic, miR-125 inhibitor, NC mimic or NC inhibitor (GenePharma, Shanghai, China). OPTI-MEM (49 µl) was pipetted onto 24-well plates to dilute 1 µl Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), and the final volume was 50 µl. After 48 h transfection, luciferase activity was detected using a Lucifer Reporter analytic system (Promega Corporation) by comparison with Renilla luciferase activity.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 7.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc.). Comparisons between two groups were measured by Student's t-test, whereas comparisons among multiple groups were conducted by one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's post hoc test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Evaluation of the CPC in vitro differentiation model

After culture, cells that were isolated from the cochleae of neonatal rats formed progenitor spheres with different morphologies, including solid, transitional and hollow spheres (Fig. 1A). Furthermore, a fraction of CPCs was positive for nestin and BrdU. As a marker of neural stem cells, nestin was mainly expressed in the cytoplasm (Fig. 1B), and BrdU, which is a marker for mitosis, was mainly expressed in the nuclei (Fig. 1C). To identify the directional differentiation cell capacity, in vitro directional differentiation was induced for 12 days. Immunofluorescence was used to detect the expression of the hair cell marker myosin VII, and the results suggested that myosin VII was expressed in the isolated cells (Fig. 1D), which confirmed that the isolated cells had the potential to differentiate into hair cells.

Figure 1. Isolated cells were able to differentiate into hair cells. (A) Cochlear progenitor cells were isolated and cultured in vitro, and the formation of progenitor spheres was observed using an inverted microscope. Magnification, ×600; Scale bar, 100 µm. Immunofluorescence was used to detect cells that were positive for (B) BrdU and (C) nestin. (D) Detection of myosin VIIA expression by immunofluorescence. Magnification, ×400; Scale bar, 20 µm.

Identification of CPC proliferation

The three types of progenitor spheres had different proportions depending on culture durations. For spheres cultured for 2, 4 and 7 days, the size of the progenitor spheres gradually increased in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 2A). During this time, the proportion of solid spheres decreased and the proportion of hollow spheres increased (Fig. 2B). CPCs in different growth phases were subjected to MTT to measure their proliferation abilities. The results demonstrated that CPCs were in the exponential phase after incubation for 1–3 days, and the cells reached a plateau after 3 days of incubation (Fig. 2C; P<0.05). The results from RT-qPCR demonstrated that the expression levels of nestin and PCNA were significantly increased and decreased after 4 and 7 days, respectively (Fig. 2D; P<0.05).

Figure 2. Proliferation ability of CPCs decreases concurrent with increased miR-125 and downregulated CDK2 expression. (A) After in vitro incubation for 2, 4 and 7 days, progenitor spheres were observed using an inverted microscope. Scale bar, 100 µm. (B) Proportion of different types of progenitor spheres. (C) Proliferation of CPCs assessed by MTT. (D) RT-qPCR analysis of nestin and PCNA. (E) Detection of miR-125 expression by RT-qPCR. CDK2 expression detected by (F) RT-qPCR and (G) western blotting. All data were expressed as the means ± standard deviation. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01. CPCs, cochlear progenitor cells; RT-qPCR, reverse transcription quantitative PCR; CDK2, cyclin-dependent kinase 2; OD, optical density.

To investigate the role of miR-125 in CPC proliferation, miR-125 expression was detected by RT-qPCR. In the spheres cultured for 4 days, the expression of miR-125 was significantly lower than that in the spheres cultured for 2 days (Fig. 2E; P<0.05). Furthermore, in the spheres cultured for 7 days, miR-125 expression was higher than that in the spheres cultured for 4 days (Fig. 2E; P<0.01). In addition, results from RT-qPCR demonstrated that CDK2 expression level was significantly increased in spheres cultured for 4 days compared with spheres cultured for 2 days (Fig. 2F; P<0.01). In addition, CDK2 expression level decreased significantly in the spheres cultured for 7 days compared with spheres cultured for 4 days (Fig. 2F; P<0.01). These findings were confirmed by western blotting (Fig. 2G; P<0.05).

Inhibitory effect of miR-125 on CPC proliferation

To further explore the effect of miR-125 on CPC proliferation, CPCs cultured for 2 days were transfected with miR-125 mimic or miR-125 inhibitor. As confirmed by RT-qPCR, miR-125 expression was elevated in the miR-125 mimic group compared with the NC mimic group, and the expression of miR-125 was decreased in the miR-125 inhibitor group compared with the NC inhibitor group (Fig. 3A; P<0.001 and P<0.01). Furthermore, the expression level of CDK2 was significantly decreased in the miR-125 mimic group compared with the NC mimic group (Fig. 3B; P<0.01), and significantly increased in the miR-125 inhibitor group compared with NC inhibitor group (Fig. 3B; P<0.01). These results were confirmed by western blotting (Fig. 3C). These findings suggested that miR-125 could negatively regulate CDK2. Furthermore, the results from RT-qPCR demonstrated that nestin and PCNA were significantly downregulated in the miR-125 mimic group compared with the NC mimic group, and significantly upregulated in the miR-125 inhibitor group compared with the NC inhibitor group (Fig. 3D; P<0.01). These data were confirmed by western blotting (Fig. 3E; P<0.05). The detection of the cell cycle by flow cytometry demonstrated that miR-125 inhibition increased the number of cells in the S phase, and that miR-125 overexpression had the opposite effect (Fig. 3F; P<0.05). Taken together, these findings suggested that miR-125 may inhibit CPC proliferation.

Figure 3. miR-125 inhibited the proliferation of CPCs. Following CPC transfection with miR-125 mimic or miR-125 inhibitor, (A) miR-125 expression and (B) CDK2 expression was examined by RT-qPCR. (C) Protein expression of CDK2 was detected by western blotting. mRNA and protein expression of nestin and PCNA was determined by (D) RT-qPCR and (E) western blotting. (F) Cell cycle analysis was detected by flow cytometry. All data were expressed as the means ± standard deviation. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 ***P<0.001. PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen; RT-qPCR, reverse transcription quantitative; NC, negative control; CDK2, cyclin-dependent kinase 2; CPCs, cochlear progenitor cells.

miR-125 exerts its regulatory effect on CPCs via CDK2

TargetScan (targetscan.org/vert_72/) results demonstrated that there were binding sites between miR-125 and CDK2 (Fig. 4A). According to these results, wt-CDK2 and mut-CDK2 were constructed, and 293T cells were co-transfected with wt-CDK2 or mut-CDK2 and miR-125 mimic or miR-125 inhibitor. The results from dual luciferase reporter assay demonstrated that miR-125 mimic significantly decreased the luciferase activity of 293T cells transfected with wt-CDK2 (P<0.01), and that miR-125 mimic did not alter the luciferase activity of 293T cells transfected with mut-CDK2 compared with the NC mimic group (Fig. 4B). Subsequently, transfection with miR-125 inhibitor significantly increased the luciferase activity of 293T cells transfected with wt-CDK2 (P<0.01), whereas the luciferase activity of 293T cells transfected with mut-CDK2 was not changed by the miR-125 inhibitor compared with the NC inhibitor (Fig. 4B).

Figure 4. miR-125 regulated CPC proliferation by downregulating CDK2. (A) Following CPC transfection with miR-125 mimic or miR-125 inhibitor, the potential binding sites between miR-125 and CDK2 were predicted. (B) Detection of luciferase activity of 293T cells transfected with wt-CDK2 or mut-CDK2. mRNA and protein expression of CDK2 was determined by (C) RT-qPCR and (D) western blotting in CPCs co-transfected with miR-125 inhibitor and si-CDK2. mRNA and protein expression of nestin and PCNA was measured by (E) RT-qPCR and (F) western blotting. (G) Cell cycle analysis was detected by flow cytometry. All data were expressed as the means ± standard deviation. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 ***P<0.001. CPCs, cochlear progenitor cells; PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen; RT-qPCR, reverse transcription quantitative; si, small interfering; mut, mutant; wt, wild type; NC, negative control; CDK2, cyclin-dependent kinase 2.

To test the interactions between miR-125 and CDK2, CPCs cultured for 2 days were co-transfected with miR-125 inhibitor and si-CDK2. The detection of the transfection efficiency of si-CDK2 by RT-qPCR and western blotting revealed a satisfactory CDK2 knockdown in CPCs (Fig. 4C and D; *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001). Furthermore, miR-125 inhibitor upregulated CDK2 expression (Fig. 4C and D; *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001). In addition, the expression levels of nestin and PCNA were significantly decreased following CDK2 knockdown compared with control group (Fig. 4E; P<0.01), whereas they were significantly increased in the miR-125 inhibitor + si-CDK2 group compared with the si-CDK2 group (Fig. 4E; P<0.01). Similar results were observed by western blotting (Fig. 4F; P<0.05). In addition, the number of cells in the S phase was decreased in the si-CDK2 group compared with the control group, and was increased in the miR-125 inhibitor + si-CDK2 group compared with the si-CDK2 group (Fig. 4G; P<0.05). Taken together, these findings suggested that miR-125 may inhibit CPC proliferation by downregulating CDK2.

Discussion

CPCs have been considered as the best candidates for hair cell regeneration (16). In the past decade, much attention has been given to the regeneration of hair cells from CPCs to rescue hearing loss. For example, a previous study isolated progenitors with high Lgr6 expression levels from transgenic mice and found that high Lgr6 expression elevated the population of progenitor cells, increasing therefore hair cell generation (17). The present study described the role and mechanism of miR-125 in CPC proliferation. Exploring the mechanisms underlying CPC proliferation may account for the treatment of hearing loss following hair cell damage.

To determine the mechanism of CPC differentiation into hair cells, cells were isolated from the cochleae of neonatal rats and further examined. BrdU, a thymine analogue, can be incorporated into new DNA during DNA synthesis (S phase) (18), suggesting that BrdU-expressing cells have proliferation ability. Nestin is a class VI intermediate filament protein associated with pluripotency in pluripotent stem cells, which is abundantly expressed in the developing central nervous system and downregulated in proliferative areas of the dentate gyrus and subventricular zone in adults (19). Nestin-expressing cells present a stem- or progenitor-like character. In the present study, cells isolated from the cochleae of neonatal rats were characterized by observing the number of cells positive for BrdU and nestin. The results demonstrated that nestin was mainly expressed in the cytoplasm whereas BrdU was expressed in the nuclei. Further results suggested that isolated cells had the potential to differentiate into hair cells, as evidenced by the expression of myosin VIIA, which normally functions in the cochlear hair cells of the inner ear. Furthermore, the results from the present study demonstrated that CPC proliferation gradually decreased in a time-dependent manner.

miRNAs have integral roles in regulating cell proliferation, differentiation and maturation in addition to the cell fate determination of stem cells (20). Numerous miRNAs, such as miR-124 and miR-182, have been implicated in inner ear development and hair cell fate by modulating downstream mRNA expression (21,22). However, the roles of miRNAs in mediating CPC proliferation remain unclear. The inhibitory effects of miR-125 family members on cell proliferation have been reported in various types of cell, including colorectal cancer cells, cardiomyocytes and osteoblasts (23–25). In the present study, miR-125 was found to be downregulated and eventually upregulated in the progenitor spheres. Furthermore, overexpression of miR-125 in CPCs decreased the levels of nestin and PCNA as well as the number of cells in the S phase. A previous study demonstrated that NEUROG1 overexpression can inhibit the proliferation of otic progenitors by decreasing CDK2 expression (26). In the present study, the expression of CDK2 was increased and then decreased in CPCs, suggesting the involvement of CDK2 in CPC proliferation. In addition, miR-125 upregulation decreased the expression of CDK2 and CDK2 expression was upregulated by the introduction of miR-125 inhibition into CPCs. To determine the mechanism of miR-125 on CPC proliferation, the relationship between miR-125 and CDK2 was investigated. A dual luciferase reporter assay demonstrated that miR-125 could negatively target CDK2. The results also revealed that miR-125 inhibition reversed the suppressive effect of CDK2 knockdown on CPC proliferation. Taken together, this study demonstrated that miR-125 inhibited CPC proliferation by downregulating CDK2. This study did not investigate the role of the miR-125/CDK2 axis in other biological processes of CPCs, such as differentiation, although results confirmed that isolated CPCs had the potential to differentiate into hair cells and that CPC proliferation was attenuated after incubation for 7 days. Previous studies have reported the essential roles of miR-125 and CDK2 in progenitor or stem cell differentiation (27–29). The function of miR-125/CDK2 axis in CPC differentiation requires further investigation.

In summary, the results from the present study suggested that CPCs may have the potential to differentiate into hair cells. In addition, miR-125 inhibited CPC proliferation by negatively targeting CDK2. Hearing loss treatment based on progenitor or stem cell strategies could therefore be considered; however, the mechanism of CPC proliferation needs to be further investigated. This study attempted to explain the molecular mechanisms of miRNA-125 on the regeneration of hair cells.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China for Distinguished Young Scholars (grant no. 81800921), Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (grant no. 2020JJ5303), the Foundation of Health and Family Planning Commission of Hunan Province (grant no. C2017033) and Hunan Provincial Technology Innovation-Oriented Projects (grant no. 2018SK50705).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

TP conceptualized and designed the experiments and supervised the study. JJP performed the experiments. GYM, ZQT, BL and EZ analyzed the data. BL and EZ revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. TP and JJP wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Animal experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee of Hunan Provincial People's Hospital (approval no. 2019S47).

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References