Open Access

Schistosoma japonicum cystatin suppresses osteoclastogenesis via manipulating the NF‑κB signaling pathway

  • Authors:
    • Yu Chen
    • Bangguo Wei
    • Panpan Xu
    • Huadong Tang
    • Langlang Yang
    • Yuhang Wang
    • Yingxiao Fu
    • Xiaodi Yang
    • Yingji Mao
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: February 9, 2021     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2021.11912
  • Article Number: 273
  • Copyright: © Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Abnormal osteoclastic activation and secretion of cysteine proteinases result in excessive bone resorption, which is one of the primary factors in the development of bone metabolic disorders, such as rheumatoid arthritis and osteoporosis. Mammalian cystatins have been demonstrated to restrain osteoclastic bone resorption and to alleviate severe osteolytic destruction via blocking the activity of cysteine proteinases. However, the specific effects of parasite cystatins on the formation and function of osteoclasts remain unclear. The purpose of the current study was to explore the effects of cystatins from Schistosoma japonicum (Sj‑Cys) on macrophage colony‑stimulating factor (M‑CSF) and receptor activator of NF‑κB ligand (RANKL)‑induced osteoclast differentiation, as well as the underlying molecular mechanisms. Recombinant Sj‑Cys (rSj‑Cys) dose‑dependently restrained osteoclast formation, with a half‑maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) value of 0.3 µM, and suppressed osteoclastic bone resorptive capability in vitro. The findings were based on tartrate resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining and bone resorption assays, respectively. However, the cell viability assay showed that the repression of rSj‑Cys on osteoclast formation did not depend on effects on cell viability or apoptosis. Based on the results of reverse transcription‑quantitative PCR and western blot analysis, it was found that rSj‑Cys downregulated the expression levels of osteoclastogenesis‑related genes and proteins, by interfering with M‑CSF and RANKL‑induced NF‑κB signaling and downstream transcription factors during early‑phase osteoclastogenesis. Overall, the results of the present study revealed that rSj‑Cys exerted an inhibitory role in osteoclast differentiation and could be a prospective biotherapeutic candidate for the treatment and prevention of bone metabolic disorders.

Introduction

Skeletal remodeling and integrity, as well as bone homeostasis, are strictly controlled by the coordinated interactions of osteoblast-mediated ossification and osteoclast-regulated bone resorption (1). The abnormal osteoclastic activation and/or defective osteoblastic function may contribute to the decline in bone quality and lead to internal microstructure damage to bone, ultimately leading to the development of bone metabolic disorders, such as rheumatoid arthritis and osteoporosis. Osteoclasts are hematopoietic stem cell-derived, multinucleated giant cells that have a unique role in bone-mineralized matrix degradation (2). Osteoclast formation is a sophisticated multiple-stage process that comprises proliferation, differentiation, and the fusion of monocyte/macrophage precursors (3). There are two cytokines that are essential for the regulation of osteoclastogenesis-related cell behavior. Specifically, osteoclast precursors rely on macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) for survival and proliferation and receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) binding for osteoclast differentiation (46). Upon RANK/RANKL interaction, the adaptor protein tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) is recruited to the cytoplasmic tail of RANK for activation of several signal transduction pathways. TRAF6-induced downstream events include initially the activation of distinct signaling pathways that are mediated by NF-κB and MAPK, and subsequently the synthesis of transcription factors, such as nuclear factor of activated T-cells cytoplasmic 1 (NFATc1) and Fos proto-oncogene AP-1 transcription factor subunit (c-Fos). These transcription factors serve as definitive regulators and modulate the expression of multiple specific genes that regulate terminal osteoclastogenesis, including tartrate resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP), osteoclast-associated receptor (OSCAR), integrin β3 (ITGB3) and cathepsin K (CTSK), thus, driving osteoclast differentiation and fusion (2,7,8).

Notably, osteoclastic bone resorption is dependent not only on the number of osteoclasts formed but also on the extent of osteoclast activation. Activated mature osteoclasts closely adhere to the bone surface, followed by a ruffled border, and thus form a sealing chamber from the extracellular environment. The process of bone resorption takes place in Howship's lacunae. Inside the segregated chamber, calcium hydroxyapatite crystals are dissolved in an acidic environment due to the acidification by hydrogen ion pumps on the cell surface, resulting in exposure of the organic bone matrix (9,10). Additionally, different proteolytic enzymes, particularly cysteine proteinases and matrix metalloproteinases, are also activated at low pH and are involved in digestion of the organic bone matrix. Although the exact cysteine proteinases that are in charge of osteoclast-mediated bone degradation are not fully understood, substantial evidence has shown that, as one member of the papain-cysteine proteinase family, cathepsin K is abundantly expressed in mammalian osteoclasts and serves a dominant role in efficient cleavage of collagenous bone matrix (11,12). Single-point mutations in the human cathepsin K gene have been associated with a rare autosomal recessive lysosomal storage disorder termed as pycnodysostosis, a specific osteopetrotic-like phenotype, characterized by dwarfism and facial deformity, as well as a predisposition to fragility fractures (13). Similarly, the phenotype of pycnodysostosis was later reproduced in cathepsin K-deficient mice, which display moderate osteopetrosis with hypermineralization, as well as many undigested collagen fragments in the subosteoclastic area, mainly in their long bones (14). Consequently, these observations support the hypothesis that cathepsin K may be a potential antiresorptive target for pharmacologic intervention in bone metabolic disorders.

Cystatins, endogenous, reversible, and tight-binding inhibitors of cysteine proteinases, have been successfully extracted, cloned, and characterized in different taxonomic groups, from viruses to vertebrates (15). Based on amino acid sequence similarity and crystal structure variation, the cystatin family is categorized into three distinct subgroups. Type I cystatins (stefins) are primarily intracellular but have been seldomly reported in body fluids. Stefins are unglycosylated proteins consisting of ~100 amino acids without disulfide bonds or carbohydrate chains. Type II cystatins, which are secretory proteins with nearly 120 amino acids and possess 2 conserved disulfide bridges toward the carboxyl terminus, are mostly extracellular and contain cystatins C, D, E/M, F, G, S, SA, and SN. Type III cystatins (kininogens), multidomain glycoproteins composed of ~350 amino acids, are synthesized in the liver and circulate predominantly in blood plasma (16,17). To date, cystatins have been widely researched and confirmed to participate in various physiopathological processes. Mammalian cystatins serve vital roles in immunomodulation, tumorigenesis, and bone remodeling, whereas parasite cystatins significantly contribute to immunosuppression in humans and may be biotherapeutic candidates for autoimmune or allergic diseases, such as asthma and inflammatory colitis (15,1820).

Schistosoma japonicum is a digenetic blood fluke with a widespread distribution in mainland China. Cystatins from S. japonicum (Sj-Cys) are similar to other parasite cystatins and have also been demonstrated in recent years to serve a vital role in modulation of the host immune response. Yang et al (21) reported that Sj-Cys could restrain the production of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin (IL-) 6 in lipopolysaccharide-induced RAW264.7 cells in vitro. Furthermore, our previous study demonstrated that Sj-Cys alleviated severe inflammation and ameliorated sepsis-induced multiple organ failure, by reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines (22). Although widespread reports of Sj-Cys have focused on the immunoregulation of inflammation and inhibitory effects on cysteine proteinase, little is known regarding the functional diversification. Given that both Sj-Cys and stefin B (cystatin B) belong to the homologous type I cystatins class, they may have common features to some extent (23). Stefin B, a single-chain protein, is ubiquitously expressed by multiple cell types, including osteoclasts. Stefin B administration restrains osteoclastic bone resorption via blocking the activity of cathepsin K (2426). However, the specific effect of Sj-Cys on regulation of the formation and activation of osteoclasts remains unclear. The current study investigated whether Sj-Cys could affect M-CSF and RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption in vitro, and explored the underlying molecular mechanisms.

Materials and methods

Production and purification of the recombinant Sj-Cys (rSj-Cys) protein

The expression and purification of rSj-Cys has been described previously (27). Briefly, DNA encoding Sj-Cys was cloned into the pET-28a vector (Promega Corporation). The sequence was confirmed to be inserted successfully before transformation of the restructured plasmid into Escherichia coli (BL 21). Next, the transformants were induced for large-scale protein expression using 1 mM isopropyl-β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) at 37°C for 5 h. After purification with the HisPur™ Ni-NTA Spin Column (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), endotoxin contamination was mostly eliminated using the ToxOut™ High-Capacity Endotoxin Removal kit (BioVision, Inc.), and residual endotoxin detection was performed using the ToxinSensor™ Chromogenic Limulus Amebocyte Lysate Endotoxin Assay kit (GenScript), in accordance with the manufacturer's protocols. Finally, a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) was used to determine the concentration of rSj-Cys.

Cell culture and in vitro osteoclastogenesis assay

RAW264.7 cells (American Type Culture Collection) were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and 1% antibiotic-antimycotics (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Cells were incubated at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. Prior to induction into osteoclasts, the cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 3×103 cells/well with α-minimal essential medium (α-MEM; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and incubated overnight. The culture medium was then replaced with complete α-MEM containing either M-CSF alone (25 ng/ml; R&D Systems, Inc.) or M-CSF (25 ng/ml) and RANKL (30 ng/ml; R&D Systems, Inc.) in the presence of rSj-Cys (0, 0.01, 0.1, 0.3, 1 or 10 µM), and cells were cultured for 5 days. The medium was replaced with fresh medium every 2 days.

TRAP staining

After induction for 5 days as aforementioned, osteoclast formation was analyzed using a commercial TRAP staining kit (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA), following the manufacturer's instructions. In brief, the medium was removed and the cells were fixed with 4% polyformaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature. After the removal of stationary liquid and rinsing thoroughly with distilled water, the cells were incubated for 1 h at 37°C with TRAP staining solution. The number of TRAP-positive multinucleated cells with three or more nuclei per well was visualized and counted under an inverted fluorescence microscope (Olympus Corporation). Additionally, the estimated half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) value of rSj-Cys was determined and used for subsequent experiments.

Bone resorption assay

Bone resorptive ability was evaluated using the Corning Osteo Assay Surface (COAS; Corning Inc.). RAW264.7 cells were plated onto the COAS at a density of 3×103 cells/well and cultured in complete α-MEM containing M-CSF (25 ng/ml) and RANKL (30 ng/ml) with or without rSj-Cys (IC50, 0.3 µM) for osteoclastogenesis. The medium was replaced with fresh medium every 2 days. Following culture for 5 days, the medium was discarded, and the cells were lysed with 10% sodium hypochlorite for 10 min before the wells were air-dried. The surface images of pits were randomly captured using an inverted fluorescence microscope, and the number and area of pit formation were quantified using the ImageJ software (version 1.38X; National Institutes of Health).

Cell viability assay

Cell viability in response to rSj-Cys was assessed using the MTT colorimetric assay (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.). In short, the RAW264.7 cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 3×103 cells/well and cultured in complete DMEM. After 4 h, the cells were treated with M-CSF (25 ng/ml) and rSj-Cys (concentration, 0 or IC50), followed by further cultivation for 24, 48 or 72 h. The medium was removed and MTT reagent was added to each well for an additional 4 h. The optical density was measured at a wavelength of 570 nm using a microplate reader.

Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)

For the analysis of mRNA expression levels of osteoclast-related genes, RAW264.7 cells were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 5×104 cells/well and co-stimulated with M-CSF (25 ng/ml) and RANKL (30 ng/ml). The cells were then treated with or without rSj-Cys (concentration, IC50) and cultured until the indicated time points (4, 24, 48 or 72 h). Total RNA was isolated from cells using TRIzol® (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and reverse-transcribed into cDNA using a PrimeScript™ RT reagent kit (Takara Bio, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Amplification of the cDNA template was conducted using the Q6 Flex Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) with the SYBR® Premix Ex Taq II kit (Takara Bio, Inc.) with specific oligonucleotide primers, as listed in Table I (Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd.). The thermocycling conditions used for qPCR were as follows: Denaturation at 95°C for 30 sec; followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 sec and 60°C for 30 sec. The β-actin housekeeping gene was used as an internal control. Relative fold changes in mRNA expression were calculated using the formula 2−ΔΔCq (28).

Table I.

Sequences of primers used for reverse transcription-quantitative PCR.

Table I.

Sequences of primers used for reverse transcription-quantitative PCR.

Target geneForward primer (5′-3′)Reverse primer (5′-3′)
Bax TGAAGACAGGGGCCTTTTTG AATTCGCCGGAGACACTCG
Bcl-2 GCTACCGTCGTGACTTCGC CCCCACCGAACTCAAAGAAGG
CTSK GAAGAAGACTCACCAGAAGCAG TCCAGGTTATGGGCAGAGATT
TRAP TGTCATCTGTGAAAAGGTGGTC ACTGGAGCAGCGGTGTTATG
ITGB3 GGCGTTGTTGTTGGAGAGTC CTTCAGGTTACATCGGGGTGA
RANK CCAGGAGAGGCATTATGAGCA ACTGTCGGAGGTAGGAGTGC
OSCAR CCGTGCTGACTTCACACCAA GGGGTGACAAGGCCACTTTT
TREM-2 CTGGAACCGTCACCATCACTC CGAAACTCGATGACTCCTCGG
NFATc1 GGAGAGTCCGAGAATCGAGAT TTGCAGCTAGGAAGTACGTCT
c-Fos CGGGTTTCAACGCCGACTA TTGGCACTAGAGACGGACAGA
IκBα TGAAGGACGAGGAGTACGAGC TTCGTGGATGATTGCCAAGTG
p65 AGGCTTCTGGGCCTTATGTG TGCTTCTCTCGCCAGGAATAC
β-actin AGAGGGAAATCGTGCGTGAC CCAAGAAGGAAGGCTGGAAA

[i] CTSK, cathepsin K; TRAP, tartrate resistant acid phosphatase; ITGB3, integrin β3; RANK, receptor activator of NF-κB; OSCAR, osteoclast-associated receptor; TREM-2, triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2; NFATc1, nuclear factor of activated T-cells cytoplasmic 1; c-Fos, Fos proto-oncogene AP-1 transcription factor subunit; IκBα, NF-κB inhibitor α; p65, RELA proto-oncogene NF-κB subunit.

Western blot analysis

The culture conditions and interventions for osteoclast differentiation were as aforementioned. After 24 or 72 h, total protein was collected using the RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) and the protein concentration was calculated using the BCA protein assay kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). Aliquots (containing 30 µg protein) were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and electrophoretically transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (Millipore) membranes. The membranes were blocked with 5% skimmed milk for 1 h at room temperature prior to incubation overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies against CTSK (1:1,000; cat. no. DF6614), TRAP (1:1,000; cat. no. DF6989), ITGB3 (1:1,000; cat. no. AF6086), RANK (1:1,000; cat. no. DF12532), triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM-2; 1:1,000; cat. no. DF12529), NFATc1 (1:1,000; cat. no. DF6446), c-Fos (1:1,000; cat. no. AF0132), NF-κB inhibitor α (IκBα; 1:1,000; cat. no. AF5002), RELA proto-oncogene NF-κB subunit (p65; 1:1,000; cat. no. AF5006), β-actin (1:2,000; cat. no. AF7018) (all from Affinity Biosciences) and OSCAR (1:1,000; cat. no. AF1633; R&D Systems, Inc.). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody (1:5,000; cat. no. S0001; Affinity Biosciences) was then added for 90 min at room temperature; then, the immunoreactive proteins were visualized using chemiluminescent HRP substrate (EMD Millipore). Band intensity was semi-quantified using ImageJ software and normalized against β-actin levels.

Statistical analysis

All experiments were conducted independently in triplicates, and numerical data were presented as means ± standard deviation. SPSS Statistics version 20.0 (IBM Corp.) and GraphPad Prism 6.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc.) were used for statistical analysis. Two-group comparisons were assessed using the Student's t-test, whereas multiple comparisons were performed using one-way analysis of variance followed by the Tukey's post hoc test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

rSj-Cys suppresses M-CSF and RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis in vitro

After the RAW264.7 cells were incubated with either M-CSF or M-CSF and RANKL in the absence or presence of rSj-Cys for 5 days, mature osteoclasts were fixed and subjected to TRAP staining. The results demonstrated that the stimulation of RAW264.7 cells with M-CSF alone failed to induce the formation of TRAP-positive multinucleated cells, whereas these cells were frequently found upon treatment with both M-CSF and RANKL (Fig. 1A). However, the number of TRAP-positive cells was gradually reduced in a dose-dependent manner following exposure to rSj-Cys (Fig. 1A and B). Osteoclast formation was restrained by ~30% with 0.1 µM rSj-Cys, and this was almost completely inhibited with 10 µM rSj-Cys treatment (Fig. 1A and B). Based on the morphological size and the number of TRAP-positive cells, the IC50 value of rSj-Cys was found to be 0.3 µM. Therefore, rSj-Cys exerted an inhibitory effect on M-CSF and RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis in RAW264.7 cells.

rSj-Cys decreases the bone resorptive capability of osteoclasts

Since osteoclast formation is a necessary presupposition for osteoclastic bone resorption, it was hypothesized that the bone resorptive ability of osteoclasts would also be markedly restricted by rSj-Cys. Thus, a bone resorption assay was conducted to investigate the effects of rSj-Cys on M-CSF and RANKL-induced bone resorption in RAW264.7 cells. As anticipated, the addition of rSj-Cys significantly decreased the area of resorption pits, even though the osteoclasts induced by M-CSF and RANKL generated large resorption pits (Fig. 2A). Quantitative analysis of the pit-formation area confirmed these results (Fig. 2B) and suggested that rSj-Cys treatment attenuated the bone resorptive capability of osteoclasts.

Effects of rSj-Cys on the survival of RAW264.7 cells

The survival of osteoclast precursors is indispensable for osteoclast differentiation and formation. To investigate the survival of the osteoclast precursor cells used in the present study, the potential cytotoxic effects of rSj-Cys on the viability of RAW264.7 cells in the presence of M-CSF were analyzed by performing an MTT colorimetric assay. The results demonstrated that M-CSF-stimulated cell proliferation was not evidently influenced by rSj-Cys at IC50 concentrations, even after 72 h of exposure (Fig. 3A). Simultaneously, RT-qPCR was performed to assess expression levels of the proapoptotic gene Bax and the antiapoptotic gene Bcl-2 to evaluate the effects of rSj-Cys on M-CSF and RANKL-induced apoptosis. As shown in Fig. 3B, the mRNA expression levels of Bax were decreasing in a time-dependent manner following stimulation with M-CSF and RANKL, and there was no appreciable effect of rSj-Cys. By contrast, the mRNA expression levels of Bcl-2 exhibited a reverse trend and were significantly elevated following the addition of rSj-Cys (Fig. 3B). Collectively, the possibility that rSj-Cys adversely affected the survival of RAW264.7 cells and consequently inhibited osteoclast formation by promoting apoptosis or by decreasing cell viability was excluded.

rSj-Cys inhibits the expression of osteoclastogenesis-related genes and proteins

To further elucidate the effects of rSj-Cys on osteoclastogenesis, the expression levels of genes and proteins associated with the osteoclast phenotype (CTSK, TRAP and ITGB3) and the cell surface receptors of osteoclast precursors (RANK, OSCAR and TREM-2) were explored by RT-qPCR and western blot analysis, respectively. The results demonstrated that treatment with M-CSF and RANKL exerted a stimulative effect on the mRNA expression levels of CTSK, TRAP, ITGB3, RANK and OSCAR in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 4A). By contrast, these enhancements were dramatically repressed following rSj-Cys intervention (Fig. 4A). These observations were identical to the findings from western blot analysis at 72 h (Fig. 4B). Notably, there were no evident variations in both mRNA and protein expression levels of TREM-2 during the entire induction period (Fig. 4A and B). The present results indicated that rSj-Cys inhibited osteoclast differentiation by regulating the expression of osteoclast phenotype markers and cell surface receptors of osteoclast precursors, with the exception of TREM-2.

rSj-Cys represses the M-CSF and RANKL-induced NF-κB signaling pathway during early-phase osteoclastogenesis

The NF-κB signaling pathway serves a critical role in the early phase of osteoclastogenesis and is responsible for the activation of crucial downstream transcription factors, namely NFATc1 and c-Fos, which are master regulators of osteoclast differentiation. Hence, the mRNA and protein expression levels of NF-κB-associated signaling molecules (IκBα and p65) and of NFATc1 and c-Fos were assessed by RT-qPCR and western blot analysis, respectively, in order to explore the underlying molecular mechanisms of the antiosteoclastogenic effects of rSj-Cys. As presented in Fig. 5A, the mRNA expression levels of IκBα, p65, NFATc1 and c-Fos were significantly upregulated upon exposure to M-CSF and RANKL over time, whereas these increases were significantly inhibited by rSj-Cys intervention. These results suggested that rSj-Cys might suppress the NF-κB signaling pathway by downregulating the mRNA expression levels of IκBα and p65 and might further impact levels of NFATc1 and c-Fos. This was consistent with the findings from western blot analysis at 24 h (Fig. 5B). The present results indicated that rSj-Cys may neutralize early-phase osteoclastogenesis primarily by regulating the NF-κB signaling pathway.

Discussion

Excessive bone resorption due to the abnormal osteoclastic activation and massive secretion of cysteine proteinases is one of the characteristics of bone metabolic disorders; and as such, reducing the number of osteoclasts and/or constraining osteoclast function may be promising approaches for treatment and prevention of osteolytic destruction. It is generally known that cysteine proteinases, especially cathepsin K, act a predominant role in osteoclastic bone matrix degradation (29). To this end, cystatins, as natural antagonists of these enzymes, have garnered extensive attention. Although multiple studies have indicated that several mammalian cystatins, such as cystatin B, C and D, effectively inhibit osteoclast differentiation and formation, the effects of parasite cystatins on osteoclastogenesis have not been reported to date (26,30). The present study explored the potential role of rSj-Cys and its regulatory mechanism on M-CSF and RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation of RAW264.7 cells.

Currently, cystatins have been discovered in various types of parasite species and mostly belong to the type II class (31). Despite the numerous studies on cystatins in a broad range of organisms, there have been few studies on these molecules from S. japonicum, especially type I class. Sj-Cys has an inhibitory effect on the proteolytic activity of papain, primarily owing to the similarity between their conserved domains and type I cystatins (23). However, the precise effect of Sj-Cys on the formation and activation of osteoclasts remains unknown, which motivated our team to conduct the presents study. Based on previous research and data, it was hypothesized that Sj-Cys might inhibit osteoclastogenesis and block the activity of cysteine proteinases to protect against excessive bone resorption.

TRAP is generally utilized as an osteoclast phenotypic marker because of its specific expression in osteoclasts (32). The present study established an osteoclast model using RAW264.7 cells that were induced by M-CSF and RANKL stimulation, and then evaluated osteoclast formation by TRAP staining, which is a standard method to identify mature osteoclasts (TRAP-positive cells). Functionally, osteoclasts possess the unique role of bone resorption; hence, a bone resorption assay was conducted to measure pit-formation ability. The results of these assays demonstrated that rSj-Cys dose-dependently decreased the number of TRAP-positive cells, with an IC50 value of 0.3 µM. In terms of the effect of rSj-Cys on bone resorption, the results showed that rSj-Cys could significantly reduce the area of resorption pits formed by osteoclasts. Altogether, the present study suggested that rSj-Cys inhibited osteoclast formation and impaired the bone resorptive capability of osteoclasts.

During osteoclastogenesis, M-CSF is crucial for the proliferation and survival of osteoclast precursors and exhibits an antiapoptotic function by regulating the expression of Bcl-2 (33,34). In the present study, results of the MTT colorimetric assay and RT-qPCR both demonstrated that rSj-Cys did not show cytotoxicity accompanied by a decrease in cell viability or the promotion of apoptosis in RAW264.7 cells.

Expression of RANK in osteoclast precursors is induced by M-CSF, and the RANK/RANKL system is critical for osteoclast differentiation and activation (6). The binding between RANK and RANKL triggers the recruitment of c-Fos, and subsequent stimulation directly activates the expression of NFATc1 (3). Previous studies have indicated that NFATc1 and c-Fos are master transcription factors that regulate osteoclast differentiation by initiating the transcription of downstream targets of osteoclastogenesis-related genes (5). Osteoclast differentiation also requires costimulatory signals induced by immunoglobulin-like receptors, including TREM-2 and OSCAR. These cell surface receptors that are expressed by osteoclast precursors are associated with adaptor proteins, such as DNAX-activating protein 12 or Fc receptor common γ-chain, and their activation leads to the amplification and translocation of NFATc1 (10). In the present study, the results demonstrated that rSj-Cys dramatically repressed the expression of osteoclast phenotype markers (CTSK, TRAP, and ITGB3) and cell surface receptors of osteoclast precursor (RANK and OSCAR) at both the mRNA and protein levels. These findings suggested that the inhibition of osteoclastogenesis caused by rSj-Cys may be relevant to the downregulation of osteoclastogenic genes and proteins.

Furthermore, the activation of c-Fos and NFATc1 is a downstream event in the NF-κB signaling pathway, which acts an essential role in the early phase of osteoclast development (35). Following stimulation with RANKL, phosphorylated IκBα is degraded and releases p65, which is translocated into the nucleus and initiates the transcription of related genes (36). In the present study, the mRNA and protein expression levels of NF-κB-associated signaling molecules (IκBα and p65), and of downstream targets (c-Fos and NFATc1), were downregulated by rSj-Cys. These findings suggested that rSj-Cys not only suppresses the NF-κB pathway, but also impacts the expression of its downstream transcription factors c-Fos and NFATc1 during early-phase osteoclastogenesis.

Taken together, the present study is the first to shed light on the inhibitory effects of rSj-Cys on M-CSF and RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation using RAW264.7 cells. rSj-Cys downregulated the expression of osteoclastogenesis-related genes and proteins, thereby restraining osteoclast formation and impairing the bone resorptive capability of osteoclasts. Furthermore, the repression of rSj-Cys did not rely on effects on cell viability or apoptosis, but rather functioned by interfering with the M-CSF and RANKL-induced NF-κB signaling during early-phase osteoclastogenesis. Nevertheless, there are limitations of the present study. The main limitation is that the inhibitory effects and regulatory mechanisms of rSj-Cys in osteoclastogenesis were examined in only one cell line in vitro; thus, additional in vivo investigations will be required to fully understand its specific functions. Despite this, the present findings suggested that rSj-Cys, as an inhibitor of osteoclast differentiation, may serve as a prospective biotherapeutic candidate for the treatment and prevention of bone metabolic disorders.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (grant nos. 2008085MH260, 2008085QH362, 1908085MH276 and gxbjZD15), the Joint Science and Technology Project of Bengbu City and Bengbu Medical College (grant no. BYLK201830), the Translational Medicine Key Projects of Bengbu Medical College (grant nos. BYTM2019006 and BYTM2019012), the Scientific Research Innovation Team of Bengbu Medical College (grant no. BYKC201910) and the 512 Talents Development Project of Bengbu Medical College (grant no. by51201205).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during the present study are included in this published article.

Authors' contributions

YC, BW, PX, HT, LY and YW performed the experiments, contributed to literature search, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. XY, YF and YM contributed to the conception and design of the study and reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Boyle WJ, Simonet WS and Lacey DL: Osteoclast differentiation and activation. Nature. 423:337–342. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Ono T and Nakashima T: Recent advances in osteoclast biology. Histochem Cell Biol. 149:325–341. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Soysa NS, Alles N, Aoki K and Ohya K: Osteoclast formation and differentiation: An overview. J Med Dent Sci. 59:65–74. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

4 

Okamoto K, Nakashima T, Shinohara M, Negishi-Koga T, Komatsu N, Terashima A, Sawa S, Nitta T and Takayanagi H: Osteoimmunology: The conceptual framework unifying the immune and skeletal systems. Physiol Rev. 97:1295–1349. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Asagiri M and Takayanagi H: The molecular understanding of osteoclast differentiation. Bone. 40:251–264. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Park JH, Lee NK and Lee SY: Current understanding of RANK signaling in osteoclast differentiation and maturation. Mol Cells. 40:706–713. 2017.PubMed/NCBI

7 

Feng X: RANKing intracellular signaling in osteoclasts. IUBMB Life. 57:389–395. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Zhao Q, Shao J, Chen W and Li YP: Osteoclast differentiation and gene regulation. Front Biosci. 12:2519–2529. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Teitelbaum SL: Bone resorption by osteoclasts. Science. 289:1504–1508. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Gruber R: Molecular and cellular basis of bone resorption. Wien Med Wochenschr. 165:48–53. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Delaissé JM, Andersen TL, Engsig MT, Henriksen K, Troen T and Blavier L: Matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) and cathepsin K contribute differently to osteoclastic activities. Microsc Res Tech. 61:504–513. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Troen BR: The role of cathepsin K in normal bone resorption. Drug News Perspect. 17:19–28. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Arman A, Bereket A, Coker A, Kiper PÖ, Güran T, Ozkan B, Atay Z, Akçay T, Haliloglu B, Boduroglu K, et al: Cathepsin K analysis in a pycnodysostosis cohort: Demographic, genotypic and phenotypic features. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 9:602014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Lazner F, Gowen M and Kola I: An animal model for pycnodysostosis: The role of cathepsin K in bone remodelling. Mol Med Today. 5:413–414. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Khatri V, Chauhan N and Kalyanasundaram R: Parasite cystatin: Immunomodulatory molecule with therapeutic activity against immune mediated disorders. Pathogens. 9:4312020. View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Ochieng J and Chaudhuri G: Cystatin superfamily. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 21 (Suppl 1):S51–S70. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Abrahamson M, Alvarez-Fernandez M and Nathanson CM: Cystatins. Biochem Soc Symp. 70:179–199. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Leto G, Crescimanno M and Flandina C: On the role of cystatin C in cancer progression. Life Sci. 202:152–160. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Brage M, Abrahamson M, Lindström V, Grubb A and Lerner UH: Different cysteine proteinases involved in bone resorption and osteoclast formation. Calcif Tissue Int. 76:439–447. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Breznik B, Mitrović A, T Lah T and Kos J: Cystatins in cancer progression: More than just cathepsin inhibitors. Biochimie. 166:233–250. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Yang X, Liu J, Yue Y, Chen W, Song M, Zhan X and Wu Z: Cloning, expression and characterisation of a type II cystatin from Schistosoma japonicum, which could regulate macrophage activation. Parasitol Res. 113:3985–3992. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Li H, Wang S, Zhan B, He W, Chu L, Qiu D, Li N, Wan Y, Zhang H, Chen X, et al: Therapeutic effect of Schistosoma japonicum cystatin on bacterial sepsis in mice. Parasit Vectors. 10:2222017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

He B, Cai G, Ni Y, Li Y, Zong H and He L: Characterization and expression of a novel cystatin gene from Schistosoma japonicum. Mol Cell Probes. 25:186–193. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Lehesjoki AE: Molecular background of progressive myoclonus epilepsy. EMBO J. 22:3473–3478. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Lecaille F, Brömme D and Lalmanach G: Biochemical properties and regulation of cathepsin K activity. Biochimie. 90:208–226. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Laitala-Leinonen T, Rinne R, Saukko P, Väänänen HK and Rinne A: Cystatin B as an intracellular modulator of bone resorption. Matrix Biol. 25:149–157. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Gao S, Li H, Xie H, Wu S, Yuan Y, Chu L, Sun S, Yang H, Wu L, Bai Y, et al: Therapeutic efficacy of Schistosoma japonicum cystatin on sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy in a mouse model. Parasit Vectors. 13:2602020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Wilson SR, Peters C, Saftig P and Brömme D: Cathepsin K activity-dependent regulation of osteoclast actin ring formation and bone resorption. J Biol Chem. 284:2584–2592. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Goto T, Yamaza T and Tanaka T: Cathepsins in the osteoclast. J Electron Microsc (Tokyo). 52:551–518. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Klotz C, Ziegler T, Daniłowicz-Luebert E and Hartmann S: Cystatins of parasitic organisms. Adv Exp Med Biol. 712:208–221. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Hayman AR: Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) and the osteoclast/immune cell dichotomy. Autoimmunity. 41:218–223. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Tanaka S, Miyazaki T, Fukuda A, Akiyama T, Kadono Y, Wakeyama H, Kono S, Hoshikawa S, Nakamura M, Ohshima Y, et al: Molecular mechanism of the life and death of the osteoclast. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1068:180–186. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Tanaka S, Wakeyama H, Akiyama T, Takahashi K, Amano H, Nakayama KI and Nakamura K: Regulation of osteoclast apoptosis by Bcl-2 family protein Bim and Caspase-3. Adv Exp Med Biol. 658:111–116. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Boyce BF, Xiu Y, Li J, Xing L and Yao Z: NF-κB-mediated regulation of osteoclastogenesis. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 30:35–44. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Vallabhapurapu S and Karin M: Regulation and function of NF-kappaB transcription factors in the immune system. Annu Rev Immunol. 27:693–733. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

April-2021
Volume 23 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Chen Y, Wei B, Xu P, Tang H, Yang L, Wang Y, Fu Y, Yang X and Mao Y: <em>Schistosoma japonicum</em> cystatin suppresses osteoclastogenesis via manipulating the NF‑κB signaling pathway. Mol Med Rep 23: 273, 2021
APA
Chen, Y., Wei, B., Xu, P., Tang, H., Yang, L., Wang, Y. ... Mao, Y. (2021). <em>Schistosoma japonicum</em> cystatin suppresses osteoclastogenesis via manipulating the NF‑κB signaling pathway. Molecular Medicine Reports, 23, 273. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2021.11912
MLA
Chen, Y., Wei, B., Xu, P., Tang, H., Yang, L., Wang, Y., Fu, Y., Yang, X., Mao, Y."<em>Schistosoma japonicum</em> cystatin suppresses osteoclastogenesis via manipulating the NF‑κB signaling pathway". Molecular Medicine Reports 23.4 (2021): 273.
Chicago
Chen, Y., Wei, B., Xu, P., Tang, H., Yang, L., Wang, Y., Fu, Y., Yang, X., Mao, Y."<em>Schistosoma japonicum</em> cystatin suppresses osteoclastogenesis via manipulating the NF‑κB signaling pathway". Molecular Medicine Reports 23, no. 4 (2021): 273. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2021.11912