International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.
International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.
Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.
Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.
Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.
Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.
International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.
Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.
Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.
Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.
An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are small vesicular structures released by cells, and contain a variety of bioactive molecules, including proteins, nucleic acids and lipids, which facilitate the transfer of information between cells. EVs play critical roles in a plethora of physiological processes and pathological mechanisms. These roles include transporting bioactive molecules, facilitating intercellular communication and modulating the functions of target cells via receptor interaction. Moreover, EVs have emerged as valuable tools in the fields of disease diagnosis and therapeutic intervention, particularly in the context of conditions like cardiovascular disorders and neurological ailments (1,2). Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are pluripotent stem cells with self-renewal properties that serve a role in cell therapy due to their potent immunomodulatory and regenerative effects (2). Recent studies have highlighted the therapeutic potential of MSCs through their paracrine products. MSCs can regulate the immune response, promote angiogenesis and exhibit anti-inflammatory effects by secreting a series of bioactive factors and MSC-derived EVs (MSC-EVs), thus potentially offering therapeutic benefits for a variety of diseases (3–5). Isolation and purification techniques for MSC-EVs continue to be refined, emphasizing the importance of determining their identity. Although EVs have broad application prospects in the medical field, there are still some challenges in their separation and purification techniques, such as improving the separation efficiency and avoiding contamination. A number of methods, including electron microscopy, nanotrack analysis, western blotting and flow cytometry, have been employed to identify MSC-EVs (2). Studies have shown that MSC-EVs exert similar biological effects as MSCs, including modulation of inflammatory responses, promotion of tissue repair and antioxidant properties (6–9). These features enable them to serve important roles in the regulation and treatment of numerous diseases. In the context of infectious diseases, such as renal tuberculosis (TB), urinary TB and TB, MSC-EVs have demonstrated marked efficacy in improving renal function and quality of life through mechanisms such as reduction of renal injury, stimulation of renal cell regeneration and repair, suppression of inflammatory responses, and antiviral/antibacterial pathways (10–13). Furthermore, comprehensive research and clinical trials are key in fully unlocking the therapeutic potential of MSC-EVs in disease treatment (10,14,15).
Based on the established understanding of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection mechanisms and the unique properties of MSCs, therapeutic strategies utilizing MSCs for the treatment of TB and multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) have garnered interest (11–13,15,16). Previous studies have further elucidated the therapeutic potential of MSCs (6–9,17,18). Yang et al (19) conducted a study in which human umbilical cord-derived MSCs (HUC-MSC-EVs) were co-cultured with Mtb-infected THP-1 macrophages. The findings indicated that MSCs were able to augment the immune response of macrophages to Mtb by activating immune receptors and inducing the production of inflammatory mediators. The present review provides an important platform for advancing TB diagnostics and therapeutic interventions, representing a notable step toward understanding and controlling Mtb pathogenesis in human hosts. Results from studies utilizing MSC-EVs have demonstrated the potential of MSC-EVs in therapeutic applications across diverse animal models, including cardiac, brain, kidney and lung injury animal models (Table I). Furthermore, MSC-EVs exhibit remarkable efficacy in mitigating the increased bacterial load associated with Mtb infection, while effectively suppressing pro-inflammatory cytokine production (10,14,20,21). However, research on the specific application of MSC-EVs in TB therapy remains relatively limited. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of various themes, encompassing an analysis of isolation methodologies for MSC-EVs and the therapeutic potential of MSC-EVs in a range of application areas, with a particular focus on their potential in the treatment of TB, current research trends and future directions in the field.
A core theory behind the enhanced biological effects of MSC-EVs is their ability to transfer bioactive molecules to target cells, thereby modulating numerous cellular processes. MSC-EVs can promote tissue repair, reduce inflammation and regulate immune responses, making them a promising therapeutic option for a range of diseases (6). The present research is primarily concerned with addressing challenges pertaining to the separation efficiency, stability and safety of MSC-EVs. Moving forward, additional enhancements in research methodologies and the accumulation of clinical trial data will be necessary to facilitate the progression of MSC-EVs therapy towards clinical implementation.
EVs were first described in 1970 (22). Research has shown that EVs typically exhibit a spherical structure with a diameter ranging between 40 and 100 nm, and the density of the lipid membrane of the vesicle falls within the range of 1.13–1.19 g/ml (23). These vesicles carry a number of biomolecules, including proteins, lipids and nucleic acids. They are internalized by recipient cells through mechanisms such as endocytosis, phagocytosis or direct membrane fusion (24,25). While the composition of EVs may vary depending on their source, common proteins found in most EVs include integrin-associated proteins (such as annexin, G proteins and flotillin), heat shock proteins (Hsps; Hsp60, Hsp70 and Hsp90) and tetraspanins (CD81, CD63 and CD9). Lipids, including sphingomyelin and cholesterol, are also present (26). Increasing evidence has indicated that EVs serve a key role in certain biological processes, including intercellular vesicle transport, immune responses and development, as well as in neurobiology and microbiology (27–29). Additionally, these vesicles have been closely associated with numerous human diseases, including cancer, cardiovascular disease, neurodegenerative disorders and infectious diseases such as TB (30). Moreover, EVs exhibit marked biotechnological potential (15,21,31,32). More than 200 preclinical studies have investigated EV-based therapies in diverse animal models (24). These studies have demonstrated the therapeutic potential of cell-derived EVs in numerous contexts, including promoting wound healing in diabetic patients (33), improving cardiac function and inhibiting arrhythmia (34,35), serving as therapeutic targets for myocardial infarction (36), preventing endometrial injury (37), acting as diagnostic/prognostic biomarkers or treatments for Alzheimer's disease (38,39), improving renal function, reducing inflammatory responses and reducing apoptosis in acute kidney injury (40,41) and porcine kidney grafts (42), promoting liver repair (43), reducing inflammation in lung diseases (44–46), promoting immune response and microbial reconstruction in inflammatory bowel disease (47) and sepsis (48), and promoting the repair of the regeneration of vessels, nerves and hair follicles in skin wounds (49), as well as regulating inflammation and promoting cartilage matrix reconstruction in joint, osteoarthritis and bone regeneration applications (50–52). Furthermore, EVs play a crucial role in the immune response to bacterial infections (53–55). Previous representative preclinical studies on MSC-EVs, such as in myocardium diseases (56,57), brain diseases (58–60), lung diseases (61–64), knee disease (65), infectious diseases (66–68) and in kidney diseases (69,70), are summarized in Table I.
Exosomes have emerged as a promising alternative to MSCs, offering similar benefits without the risk of injection complications (71–73). Evidence has suggested that MSC-EVs, including HUC-MSC-EVs, are a safer therapeutic option, free from systemic allergic reactions, hemolysis, pyrogenic reactions, abnormal hematological changes, and vascular and muscle irritation problems (23). MSC-EVs contain a diverse range of biological molecules, including numerous types of RNA such as mRNA and microRNA (miRNA/miR), as well as proteins. These molecules serve a central role in promoting epithelial repair, tissue regeneration and the secretion of important cytokines, including TGF, keratinocyte growth factor, VEGF and hepatocyte growth factor, amongst others (74). Research has shown that MSC-EVs function by reducing the levels of TNF-α while increasing the levels of molecules such as TGF-β and IL-10 (75). In addition, MSC-EVs possess the ability to modulate the immune system by balancing the ratio of T helper cells (Th1/Th2, promoting the generation of regulatory T cells (Tregs) and inhibiting B cell activity (76). MSC-EVs not only boost the expression of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase and activate the CD39 and CD73 adenosine signaling pathways, but also help in converting inflammatory M1 macrophages into anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages. This transformation is important in regulating inflammation and decreasing the levels of TNF-α (14,15,77). MSC-EVs have been shown to stimulate angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in endothelial cells (ECs) within ischemic areas by transporting proteins and miRNA. This research is of great note, as it demonstrates the crucial role played by MSC-EVs, which may be regulated by integrin subunit α5 and neuropilin-1 proteins (78). MSC-EVs with elevated programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression have demonstrated potential in the therapeutic management of autoimmune disorders. Through the employment of lentivirus-mediated gene transfection strategies, scientists have engineered MSC-small EVs (sEVs) that overexpress PD-L1 to modulate the immune response within targeted tissues. This innovative approach has demonstrated the capacity of MSC-sEVs-PD-L1 to orchestrate the conversion of multiple activated immune cells towards an immunosuppressive phenotype, thereby facilitating the restoration of the local immune microenvironment in autoimmune pathology (79). Pei et al (80) examined the immunomodulatory effects of MSC-EVs on sepsis-associated liver dysfunction in a mouse model induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Their findings indicated that MSC-EVs could mitigate liver tissue damage and induce the transformation of M1 macrophages into M2 macrophages. In vitro experiments demonstrated that treatment with MSC-EVs markedly reduced the expression of glycolytic enzymes, diminished glycolytic activity and effectively suppressed the inflammatory response of macrophages by downregulating hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) expression (80). MSC-EVs can regulate the immune system of the body, have antibacterial effects and promote tissue repair by containing a variety of bioactive substances, such as cytokines, growth factors and nucleic acids. These bioactive substances can regulate the physiological processes within the body through various signaling pathways, thereby playing a role in treating diseases, such as drug-resistant infections, sepsis and viral pneumonia (14,80–83) (Fig. 1) (14,15,20,74,76–78,84–87).
MSC-EVs, noted for their enhanced functionality, have attracted considerable research attention. Previous studies (21,32,73) have made notable advancements in uncovering their therapeutic potential. Research utilizing bone marrow-derived MSC-EVs (BM-MSC-EVs) has demonstrated their effects on ECs within ischemic tissue, both in vitro and in vivo. MSC-EVs have been demonstrated to promote angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in ECs located within ischemic regions. This effect is mediated by the transfer of proteins and microRNAs by MSC-EVs, demonstrating their pivotal role in facilitating these physiological processes (78). In a mouse model of severe hind limb ischemia, MSC-EVs were found to enhance the recovery of blood flow in ischemic muscle tissue, leading to an increase in blood vessel density in vivo. This pro-angiogenic effect was accompanied by an increase in nitric oxide production in ischemic muscle (78). The findings have indicated that fibroblasts-EVs showed the worst effect on chondrogenesis, while juvenile chondrocyte-EVs and adult chondrocyte-EVs showed a comparable effect on chondrogenic differentiation as BM-MSC-EVs, and BM-MSC-EVs showed the best effect on cell proliferation and migration. In the rat model, a small intestinal submucosal acellular extracellular matrix hydrogel carrying BM-MSC-EVs was successfully utilized to treat articular cartilage defects, resulting in a marked improvement in cartilage regeneration (88). An additional investigation of miRNA-26b-5p-enriched MSC-EVs in spinal cord injury (SCI) revealed that MSC-EVs could ameliorate motor dysfunction, inflammation and oxidative stress in SCI rats. The delivery of miR-26b-5p by MSC-EVs to PC12 cells led to reduced inflammatory responses and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production induced by LPS, along with enhanced cell viability. In addition, miR-26b-5p suppresses the activity of KDM6A, which reduces H3K27me3 levels at the NOX4 promoter and thereby promotes NOX4 expression. However, overexpression of either KDM6A or NOX4 abrogates the protective effects conferred by MSC-EVs (89). Previous research has also demonstrated that HUC-MSC-EVs could effectively and safely improve chronic kidney disease. Following treatment with HUC-MSC-EVs, notable improvements were observed in the estimated glomerular filtration rate, serum creatinine levels, blood urea levels and the urine albumin-creatinine ratio (90). In addition, Ma et al (84) reported that in a mouse model of renal ischemia-reperfusion injury, administration of human placental MSC-EVs led to marked improvements in renal function, a decrease in the severity of acute kidney injury and a reduction in chronic interstitial fibrosis. MSC-EVs mainly achieved renoprotection by regulating Bax/Bcl-2-dependent apoptosis during acute kidney injury and mostly reduced tubular atrophy and kidney interstitial fibrosis by regulating Ras-pERK-Ets1-p53 pathway-dependent cell senescence (84). Researchers have also explored the potential enhancement of EVs derived from induced MSCs for treating acute kidney injury through stimulation by stimulating them with pan-peroxisome proliferator-activating receptor agonists (81). Shi et al (85) investigated potential therapeutic interventions for renal fibrosis and found that HUC-MSC-EVs could retard the progression of renal fibrosis by suppressing ADAM17. Notably, miR-13474 was highly enriched in HUC-MSC-EVs and efficiently targeted ADAM17 mRNA for inhibition, thereby reducing Notch1 activation, blocking TGF-β signaling pathway engagement and decreasing collagen deposition, all of which contribute to mitigating fibrotic development (85). Preclinical studies have also shown promising results in the treatment of acute and chronic renal failure and bladder reconstruction, For instance, preclinical studies have been applied in the treatment of acute and chronic renal failure, as well as in bladder reconstruction (91,92). In addition, it has been reported that Mtb can successfully evade the effects of drugs and inflammatory cytokines within MSCs during the treatment of infectious diseases. MSCs offer a protective environment for Mtb, aiding in its resistance to anti-TB medications. Despite possessing phagosome maturation capabilities, MSCs readily engulf Mtb and facilitate its proliferation. In contrast to the behavior of Mtb within macrophages, which is known to be susceptible to anti-TB drugs, Mtb residing within MSCs demonstrates a pronounced resistance or tolerance to the same drugs, primarily attributed to the presence of ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 1, ATP binding cassette subfamily G member 2 and vacuolar H+-ATPase (93).
In the case of TB infection, MSC-EV treatment can lead to the following benefits: i) Immune balance reconstruction by inhibiting the excessive activation of macrophages and reducing inflammatory damage in the vicinity of granulomas to combat intracellular Mtb; ii) enhancing host defense through the delivery of miRNA, where MSC-EVs activate macrophage autophagy, aiding in the clearance of Mtb and preventing immune evasion by Mtb; and iii) tissue repair, where MSC-EVs contribute to the reduction of tissue fibrosis by inhibiting fibroblast transformation and downregulating the TGF-β/Smad pathway (10,20,94). MSCs are a natural reservoir for latent Mtb infection, whereas macrophages promote an environment conducive for Mtb replication. Mtb can enter a dormant state within MSCs, prompting Mtb to enter a quiescent state. This process leads to the synthesis of lipid droplets by MSCs, which helps Mtb evade the immune response of the host. Successful treatment of TB necessitates eradication of both actively replicating and dormant bacteria. Dormant bacteria typically do not respond to conventional antibiotics; however, they can be targeted by autophagy induction. Thus, the combination of antibiotics and autophagy inducers is a promising approach for the effective treatment of TB (95). Studies have shown that MSC-EVs from different sources (such as the bone marrow, umbilical cord and adipose tissue) may have different therapeutic effects. Specifically, BM-MSC-EVs have demonstrated promising results in stimulating angiogenesis. On the other hand, HUC-MSC-EVs exhibit superior capabilities in modulating anti-inflammatory responses and regulating the immune system (23,96). In addition, adipose-derived MSC-EVs exhibit marked effects in the treatment of fat metabolism-related diseases such as diabetic nephropathy, but their antibacterial activity may not be as good as that of other MSC-EVs (97). Therefore, for the treatment of TB, the selection of MSC-EVs from different sources and the role of MSC-EVs require further in-depth research.
The isolation of EVs is crucial for scientific research (98) and forms the basis for maintaining their purity, yield and accuracy in subsequent functional studies. The source of MSCs used in EV research varies, with the majority being isolated from the bone marrow (51%), followed by umbilical cord/placental tissue (23%) and adipose tissue (13%). In addition, MSCs derived from embryonic or induced pluripotent stem cells account for 8% of MSCs, while other sources account for 5% of the total (26). Currently, a number of methods are commonly used for EV separation, including differential centrifugation, size exclusion chromatography, immunoaffinity capture, ultracentrifugation and ultrafiltration, each with its own unique attributes (99).
A primary technique for EV separation is differential centrifugation, which separates EVs based on their differing settling velocities in a liquid medium. By adjusting factors such as the centrifugal force, time and rotor type, different particle sizes can be effectively separated. For example, extending the centrifugation time can enhance the yields of RNA and proteins in EVs (100). While this method is easy to use and cost-effective, it is heavily reliant on specific equipment and can introduce impurities, such as cell debris, thereby impacting the purity of the final product (100–102).
By size exclusion chromatography, exosomes can be separated based on their particle size, resulting in high purity and enhanced functionality. This method is characterized by its simplicity, excellent repeatability, scalability, affordability and the fact that it does not require specialized equipment or expert knowledge (103). However, relying solely on size-exclusion chromatography can result in residual impurities. Therefore, the combination of size-exclusion chromatography and ultracentrifugation has garnered interest, as it effectively enhances the quality and purity of exosomes in serum (104).
This technique involves the use of antibody-coated magnetic beads to selectively isolate exosomes that express specific surface markers with high specificity. Particularly beneficial for processing low concentration samples, this method has a higher cost and is limited by the specificity and efficacy of the antibodies used (99,105). Brambilla et al (106) introduced an innovative capture and release approach utilizing DNA-directed fixation of anti-CD63 antibodies. By employing deoxyribonuclease I, the authors effectively isolated all EVs and conducted a comprehensive analysis using advanced imaging technologies, including nanoparticle tracking analysis, transmission electron microscopy and single-particle interferometric reflectance imaging sensing (101,106).
A main principle of this technique is to separate vesicles based on their size and to concentrate them from biological fluids using centrifugal enrichment equipment. Although this method is fast, its ability to separate small vesicles is limited (99). Membranes with low protein-binding properties are ideal for this process because they reduce the adherence of EV proteins and enhance their recovery (101,102). Typically, ultrafiltration is combined with other methods (such as use of differential ultracentrifugation, filtration, concentration and high-resolution density-gradient fractionation) to enhance the purity and separation efficiency (102,107).
This approach utilizes centrifugal force for vesicle separation. The benefits of ultra-centrifugation encompass superior purity, consistency and functional efficacy of isolated EVs, ultimately leading to a potential increase of >22% in the activity of hypoxic cells. However, drawbacks include the risk of vesicle rupture, difficulty in handling small sample volumes, high cost and the specialized nature of ultracentrifuges (108). In EV research, the importance of separation efficiency and sample purity is indisputable. A previous study conducted a comparative analysis of two EV purification techniques, namely ultrafiltration combined with liquid chromatography and ultracentrifugation itself. The findings revealed that the combination of ultrafiltration and liquid chromatography resulted in a notable enhancement of EV production compared with ultracentrifugation, while maintaining the protein composition of EVs. Notably, experimental data demonstrated that EVs purified using ultrafiltration and liquid chromatography retained their inherent biophysical characteristics (107). In another experiment, a combination of analytical techniques, including dynamic light scattering, scanning electron microscopy and flow cytometry, were utilized to isolate and characterize EVs. The findings of this investigation demonstrate that the efficient loading of ovalbumin (OVA) onto SMC-EVs had been successfully optimized. Specifically, it was ascertained that the most advantageous outcome was achieved when the initial concentration of OVA was 500 µg/ml and the incubation duration was set at 6 h (105). However, there are variations in the secretion and function of MSC-derived EVs from different sources. Data have revealed that MSCs for exosome-enriched fractions studies have been isolated from a variety of tissues (26). Based on the diverse advantages and disadvantages of different EV isolation technologies (as summarized in Table II), researchers should carefully select an isolation method that aligns with their objectives.
Although research on MSC-EVs in the treatment of intrapulmonary or extrapulmonary TB is still limited, preliminary findings have shown promising results (10,20). This necessitates further investigation and summarization of the current research in this area.
According to statistics from the World Health Organization, the global TB incidence reached 10.8 million in 2023, which was a 0.9% increase from 10.7 million in 2022 (109). Among extrapulmonary TB cases, genitourinary TB, particularly renal TB, is the most prevalent form (110). Previous studies have increasingly suggested that MSCs hold therapeutic promise for inflammatory and sclerotic diseases, including renal TB (11,12). Supporting this potential, one study has evaluated BM-MSCs as a combination therapy for experimental renal TB model in rabbits. Researchers induced renal TB by injecting TB H37Rv into the renal cortex under ultrasound guidance. All animals developed renal failure within 2.5 months. Anti-TB drugs reduced the levels of albumin, copper protein and elastase, improved the balance of mediators/inhibitors, and enhanced the inflammatory response, while BM-MSC transplantation exhibited different benefits. At 1 month post-transplant, inflammatory protein levels decreased, kidney-specific destructive inflammation subsided and mature connective tissue was formed, indicating activated repair mechanisms (86). Researchers compared the cellular reactions of MSCs to the virulent H37Rv strain and the attenuated H37Ra strain. The results showed that early infection (≤24 h) with H37Rv led to a marked increase in the phosphorylation of toll-like receptor (TLR)-2, protein kinase AMP-activated catalytic subunit-α (PRKAA)-1 and PRKAA2 in MSCs compared with attenuated H37Ra infection. Activation of the TLR2-AMPK pathway enhanced autophagic induction in H37Rv-infected MSCs, as demonstrated by elevated Atg9b expression and an increased LC3-II/LC3-I ratio. In addition, metabolic analysis revealed that, compared with H37Ra infection, H37Rv infection led to increased expression of SLC2A3, PFKFB3, HK1 and ABCA1 in MSCs. Despite the differences in autophagy induction, the bacterial loads between the two strains remained similar, indicating a potential role of apoptosis and immune inflammation in the control of mycobacterial growth (111).
EVs exhibit therapeutic relevance in TB. Host- or pathogen-derived EVs carry pathogenic antigens, regulating immune responses, metabolism and cell death (112). Specifically, EVs from Mtb-infected cells control inflammatory cytokines through antigen presentation, transmit immunoregulatory molecules to T helper cells and promote adaptive immune responses (113,114). Studies have shown that infection with Mtb promotes the release of MSC-EVs without affecting MSC proliferation; these vesicles can be internalized by macrophages and induce time-dependent pro-inflammatory responses through upregulation of TNF-α, RANTES and iNOS. This process is primarily mediated via the TLR2/4-MyD88 signaling pathway, and in vivo experiments further demonstrate that EVs derived from Mtb-infected MSCs (Mtb-MSC-EVs) can trigger pro-inflammatory responses in mice even during anti-TB treatment (87). A rabbit model of renal TB was established by injecting Mtb H37Rv into the renal cortical parenchyma, followed by intravenous administration of MSC-EVs in combination with standard anti-TB therapy (ATT). Compared with ATT alone, the combination treatment significantly increased serum anti-inflammatory cytokine levels while reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines and improving alkaline phosphatase, adenosine deaminase and body weight. Further analyses indicated that MSC-EVs are enriched with antimicrobial peptides such as lactotransferrin, lysozyme and cystatin B, as well as proteins with anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties, suggesting a potential role in alleviating renal injury (15).
Beyond therapy, Mtb-derived membrane vesicles show potential as next-generation vaccines, eliciting stronger adjuvant-free immunity compared with the traditional Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) (115). EV-associated genes may also serve as biomarkers or therapeutic targets (114). Given their efficacy in preclinical models of acute/chronic kidney inflammation and functional impairment, MSC-EVs represent a promising strategy for renal TB treatment (10,91,116).
The lungs are particularly susceptible to Mtb infection (117). A clinical trial has investigated the systemic transplantation of autologous MSCs in patients with MDR-TB or extensively drug-resistant TB refractory to conventional therapy. A group of patients who did not respond well to standard TB treatment showed positive outcomes after receiving stem cell therapy with MSCs. At 36 months postoperatively, all 27 patients exhibited clinical improvement. Within 3–4 months after surgery, 20 patients cleared bacteria from their lungs and 11 had reduced lung tissue cavities. A total of 16 patients received stem cell therapy along with standard treatment, 9 patients experienced sustained remission of TB for up to 2 years, and 6 patients showed marked improvements in both bacterial load and structural changes in their lungs. The study suggested that combining autologous MSCs with conventional TB therapy may improve outcomes in patients with drug-resistant TB (118).
In a Cornell model of Mtb persistence in mice (119), it was observed that the highly virulent green fluorescent protein-labeled Mtb strain H37Rv persisted in CD271+ BM-MSCs 90 days after treatment with isoniazid and pyrazinamide. Infected BM-MSCs were identified using pyronidazole, an in vivo marker of hypoxia. Notably, the treatment regimen successfully eradicated Mtb infection in the lungs of the mice. Subsequent experiments involved the isolation of CD271+ BM-MSCs from post-treatment mice, which were then transplanted into healthy mice. Notably, the recipients developed active TB infections in their lungs, determining the presence of viable Mtb within BM-MSCs. In addition, this study revealed that Mtb infection induced a notable increase in the hypoxic phenotype of CD271+ BM-MSCs. In a parallel investigation involving individuals previously treated for TB, Mtb-containing CD271+ BM-MSCs exhibited heightened expression of HIF-1α and reduced levels of CD146, a cell surface marker typically downregulated in hypoxic human BM-MSCs. These findings suggested that the Mtb harbored by CD271+ BM-MSCs may be situated within an anoxic microenvironment, which serves a key role in promoting the quiescent state of Mtb (119). Chenari et al (120) conducted a study in which MSCs were isolated from mouse adipose tissue, and their phenotype and differentiation properties were evaluated. Cell-conditioned medium (CM) collected from these MSCs was administered intranasally to mice. This study showed that CM helped achieve an improved balance in the inflammatory response to BCG infection, thereby reducing lung tissue damage. Previous studies have identified two types of scavenger receptors (macrophage receptor with collagenous structure and scavenger receptor class B member 1) that are involved in the ability of MSCs to phagocytize Mtb (121,122). Blocking the receptor with antibodies or inhibiting its expression through siRNA technology has been proven to reduce the uptake of Mtb. Additionally, research has indicated that infusion of autologous MSCs into patients with TB is safe and can enhance lung immunity (121). Furthermore, a study explored the potential of MSC-EVs in combatting Mtb infection in alveolar epithelial type II cells. Treatment with MSC-EVs markedly inhibited the increase in bacterial load induced by Mtb infection and prevented the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (20).
Genitourinary TB commonly results in bladder contracture and diminished bladder capacity, and in severe cases, a notably reduced bladder size until the bladder becomes completely atretic (59). Conservative treatment of stage IV bladder TB is typically ineffective, warranting consideration of surgical intervention. Although numerous surgical strategies have proven to be effective, there is a substantial risk of complications (110). Electrolyte imbalances, metabolic abnormalities, excessive mucus production, stone formation, recurrent urinary infections and altered drug metabolism should be considered when addressing potential serious complications and surgical techniques in the context of the urinary system (123). In a study utilizing a New Zealand rabbit model of bladder TB, the efficacy of interstitial injection of MSCs combined with standard anti-TB treatment in restoring bladder function was determined. To track the localization of MSCs in tissues, cells were tagged with superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. The findings indicated that the nanoparticles were readily absorbed by the cells without compromising their proliferation ability. A single administration of MSCs directly into the bladder mucosa proved to be effective in reducing bladder wall deformation and inflammation (54). In a treatment trial involving 20 female ‘Totoro’ rabbits with experimental genital TB, the administration of MSCs markedly enhanced the repair process of the body and effectively promoted re-epithelialization of the fallopian tubes 2 months after inoculation. MSCs also exhibit a bactericidal mechanism similar to that of macrophages, involving the production of ROS and the transfer of hydrolases from lysosomes to phagosomes. In addition, MSCs exhibit the potential to enhance the bactericidal capacity of macrophages by regulating their phenotypes. These findings serve as an important theoretical foundation for the development of novel approaches for TB treatment using EVs (55). A number of studies regarding the use of MSC-EVs for TB treatment are ongoing and summarized in Fig. 2 (15,54,55,87,111,119,120,123). In addition, a summary of research on EVs specifically targeting TB is provided in Table III. This includes studies involving EVs derived from Mtb-infected cells and patients, EVs administered to mice for immunization purposes, EVs isolated from serum samples of TB patients, EVs investigated in TB animal models and EVs discovered in pleural fluid samples (10,20,124–133).
MSC-EVs show marked promise in TB treatment, offering potent immunomodulation, direct antibacterial effects and tissue repair capabilities. MSC-EVs improve pathological outcomes, reduce inflammation and combat Mtb through numerous mechanisms. Furthermore, MSC-EVs improve kidney function, promote weight gain and restore serum adenosine deaminase activity. Targeted elimination of HIF-1α-high/CD146-low MSCs within hypoxic niches could potentially eradicate latent TB infections. MSCs can eliminate Mtb through delivery of ROS and lysosomal enzymes as aforementioned. Technologically, methods such as ultrafiltration combined with liquid chromatography enhance the purity and functional capacity of MSC-EVs. Notably, their therapeutic efficacy is dependent on the tissue source of the parent MSCs. Key challenges requiring resolution include establishing standardized protocols for mass production and determining long-term safety (134–137). In summary, the primary focus of current research encompasses enhancing the preparation techniques of MSC-EVs, elucidating the mechanisms underlying the biological action of MSC-EVs and utilizing MSC-EVs for the treatment of infectious diseases such as TB.
Future research directions include engineering EVs (such as MSC-EVs with high PD-L1 expression, conducting multi-omics studies and accelerating clinical translation. From a technological standpoint, there is a need to continue optimizing existing technologies and to investigate novel isolation strategies in order to improve the purity, yield and efficiency of MSC-EVs. This will provide strong support for the utilization of MSC-EVs in disease diagnosis, treatment and biomarker research, thereby advancing the field of EV-related research towards clinical applications. A key aspect in MSC-EVs clinical translation involves understanding how these conditions, such as temperature, storage duration and freeze-drying affect key properties such as morphology, functionality and therapeutic payload. Research has shown that MSC-EVs maintain their core biological activities, including anti-inflammatory effects and enhanced angiogenesis promotion, for up to 4–6 weeks when stored at temperatures of −20°C and −80°C. In addition, freeze-drying successfully preserved these functional properties (138). A combination of in vitro experiments and in vivo wound healing models has demonstrated that optimal storage conditions not only preserve stability but also ensure the functionality of miRNA and long non-coding RNA cargos within EVs (138). While there is currently a dearth of research specifically investigating the effects of MSC-EVs on Mtb infection utilizing integrated omics methodologies, findings from related studies offer encouraging prospects for utilizing MSC-EVs as therapeutic agents for TB. For example, a recent study took a comprehensive approach by integrating proteomics, metabolomics and transcriptomics analyses to elucidate the inhibitory mechanism of MSC-EVs on the HepG2 cell line of hepatocellular carcinoma, thereby contributing to advancements in this field (139). Despite their potential, current production platforms for MSC-EVs face a number of limitations during clinical application, including variability arising from donor sources, scalability challenges and inconsistent therapeutic outcomes. To effectively address these shortcomings, it is imperative to establish a scalable, standardized production platform that integrates high-quality MSC-EVs manufacturing with artificial intelligence-integrated, fully automated, Good Manufacturing Practice of Medical Products-compliant manufacturing of therapeutic EVs suitable for clinical translation (140). Collectively, MSC-EVs represent a promising novel therapeutic strategy with the potential to address drug-resistant TB and other challenging infections (125,141–143). However, prior to clinical translation, it is important to perform a thorough risk assessment, including analysis of factors such as immunogenicity, potential pro-inflammatory effects and the possibility of promoting TB dormancy.
Not applicable.
The present review was supported by the Sichuan Science and Technology Program (grant nos. 2022YFS0607, 23NSFSC1456 and 2024 NSFSC0709) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 31972909, 82070502 and 32171099).
Not applicable.
YY and LY conceived the review idea and obtained the funding. DF was responsible for organizing the manuscript, designing the narrative to enhance coherence and completing the writing of the manuscript. YY and LY edited the manuscript and provided supervision. Data authentication is not applicable. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
|
Mehaffy C, Dobos KM, Nahid P and Kruh-Garcia NA: Second generation multiple reaction monitoring assays for enhanced detection of ultra-low abundance Mycobacterium tuberculosis peptides in human serum. Clin Proteomics. 14:212017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ibrahim SA and Khan YS: Histology, extracellular vesicles. StatPearls. Publishing LLC.; Treasure Island, FL: 2025 | |
|
Pakdaman Kolour SS, Nematollahi S, Dehbozorgi M, Fattahi F, Movahed F, Esfandiari N, Kahrizi MS, Ghavamikia N and Hajiagha BS: Extracecellulr vesicles (EVs) microRNAs (miRNAs) derived from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in osteoarthritis (OA); detailed role in pathogenesis and possible therapeutics. Heliyon. 11:e422582025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chang M, Liu R, Chen B, Xu J, Wang W, Ji Y, Gao Z, Liu B, Yao X, Sun H, et al: hBMSC-EVs alleviate weightlessness-induced skeletal muscle atrophy by suppressing oxidative stress and inflammation. Stem Cell Res Ther. 16:462025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zheng B, Wang X, Guo M and Tzeng CM: Current development of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles. Cell Transplant. 34:96368972412976232025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Jafarinia M, Alsahebfosoul F, Salehi H, Eskandari N and Ganjalikhani-Hakemi M: Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles: A novel cell-free therapy. Immunol Invest. 49:758–780. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Poh BM, Liew LC, Soh YNA, Lai RC, Lim SK, Ho YS and Soh BS: MSC-derived small extracellular vesicles exert cardioprotective effect through reducing VLCFAs and apoptosis in human cardiac organoid IRI model. Stem Cells. 42:416–429. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Amaro-Prellezo E, Gómez-Ferrer M, Hakobyan L, Ontoria-Oviedo I, Peiró-Molina E, Tarazona S, Salguero P, Ruiz-Saurí A, Selva-Roldán M, Vives-Sanchez R and Sepúlveda P: Extracellular vesicles from dental pulp mesenchymal stem cells modulate macrophage phenotype during acute and chronic cardiac inflammation in athymic nude rats with myocardial infarction. Inflamm Regen. 44:252024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Beljanski V, Moreno Hollweg MJ, Potens R, Blaylock T, Irausquin AB, Paleati N and Nathanson L: Functional and molecular characterization of extracellular vesicles enriched in exosomes released by bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells exposed to IFNγ in combination with autophagy modulators tamoxifen or chloroquine. Noncoding RNA. 12:12025.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yudintceva N, Bobkov D, Sulatsky M, Mikhailova N, Oganesyan E, Vinogradova T, Muraviov A, Remezova A, Bogdanova E, Garapach I, et al: Mesenchymal stem cells-derived extracellular vesicles for therapeutics of renal tuberculosis. Sci Rep. 14:44952024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhang X, Xie Q, Ye Z, Li Y, Che Z, Huang M and Zeng J: Mesenchymal stem cells and tuberculosis: Clinical challenges and opportunities. Front Immunol. 12:6952782021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Devi A, Pahuja I, Singh SP, Verma A, Bhattacharya D, Bhaskar A, Dwivedi VP and Das G: Revisiting the role of mesenchymal stem cells in tuberculosis and other infectious diseases. Cell Mol Immunol. 20:600–612. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kaur S, Angrish N, Vasudevan M and Khare G: Global proteomics reveals pathways of mesenchymal stem cells altered by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Sci Rep. 14:306772024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yudintceva N, Mikhailova N, Fedorov V, Samochernych K, Vinogradova T, Muraviov A and Shevtsov M: Mesenchymal stem cells and MSCs-derived extracellular vesicles in infectious diseases: From basic research to clinical practice. Bioengineering (Basel). 9:6622022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yuan D, Bao Y and El-Hashash A: Mesenchymal stromal cell-based therapy in lung diseases; from research to clinic. Am J Stem Cells. 13:37–58. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Abbasi R, Alamdari-Mahd G, Maleki-Kakelar H, Momen-Mesgin R, Ahmadi M, Sharafkhani M and Rezaie J: Recent advances in the application of engineered exosomes from mesenchymal stem cells for regenerative medicine. Eur J Pharmacol. 989:1772362025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Noh MY, Lim SM, Oh KW, Cho KA, Park J, Kim KS, Lee SJ, Kwon MS and Kim SH: Mesenchymal stem cells modulate the functional properties of microglia via TGF-β secretion. Stem Cells Transl Med. 5:1538–1549. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Abiko M, Mitsuhara T, Okazaki T, Imura T, Nakagawa K, Otsuka T, Oshita J, Takeda M, Kawahara Y, Yuge L and Kurisu K: Rat cranial bone-derived mesenchymal stem cell transplantation promotes functional recovery in ischemic stroke model rats. Stem Cells Dev. 27:1053–1061. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yang Q, Zhou Y, Farooq W, Liu Q, Duan J, Xing L, Wu C and Dong L: The immunomodulatory effects of mesenchymal stem cells on THP-1-derived macrophages against Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Ra infection. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 150:1025932025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yan K, Xu G and Li Z: MicroRNA-20b carried by mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles protects alveolar epithelial type II cells from Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in vitro. Infect Genet Evol. 101:1052922022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Din MAU, Wan A, Chu Y, Zhou J, Yan Y and Xu Z: Therapeutic role of extracellular vesicles from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells and their wide therapeutic implications in inflammatory bowel disease and other inflammatory disorder. Front Med (Lausanne). 11:14065472024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Grillo MA: Extracellular synaptic vesicles in the mouse heart. J Cell Biol. 47:547–553. 1970. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yaghoubi Y, Movassaghpour A, Zamani M, Talebi M, Mehdizadeh A and Yousefi M: Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells derived-exosomes in diseases treatment. Life Sci. 233:1167332019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wei YN, Yan CY, Zhao ML and Zhao XH: The role and application of vesicles in triple-negative breast cancer: Opportunities and challenges. Mol Ther Oncolytics. 31:1007522023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Latifkar A, Cerione RA and Antonyak MA: Probing the mechanisms of extracellular vesicle biogenesis and function in cancer. Biochem Soc Trans. 46:1137–1146. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Elahi FM, Farwell DG, Nolta JA and Anderson JD: Preclinical translation of exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem/stromal cells. Stem Cells. 38:15–21. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
van Niel G, D'Angelo G and Raposo G: Shedding light on the cell biology of extracellular vesicles. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 19:213–228. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Abels ER and Breakefield XO: Introduction to extracellular vesicles: Biogenesis, RNA cargo selection, content, release, and uptake. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 36:301–312. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yang C, Xue Y, Duan Y, Mao C and Wan M: Extracellular vesicles and their engineering strategies, delivery systems, and biomedical applications. J Control Release. 365:1089–1123. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Mehaffy C, Ryan JM, Kruh-Garcia NA and Dobos KM: Extracellular vesicles in mycobacteria and tuberculosis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 12:9128312022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Carrière J, Barnich N and Nguyen HT: Exosomes: From functions in host-pathogen interactions and immunity to diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 172:39–75. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Börger V, Bremer M, Ferrer-Tur R, Gockeln L, Stambouli O, Becic A and Giebel B: Mesenchymal stem/stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicles and their potential as novel immunomodulatory therapeutic agents. Int J Mol Sci. 18:14502017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Qiao Z, Wang X, Zhao H, Deng Y, Zeng W, Yang K, Chen H, Yan Q, Li C, Wu J and Chen Y: The effectiveness of cell-derived exosome therapy for diabetic wound: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 85:1018582023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lin YN, Mesquita T, Sanchez L, Chen YH, Liu W, Li C, Rogers R, Wang Y, Li X, Wu D, et al: Extracellular vesicles from immortalized cardiosphere-derived cells attenuate arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy in desmoglein-2 mutant mice. Eur Heart J. 42:3558–3571. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhang X, Wu Y, Cheng Q, Bai L, Huang S and Gao J: Extracellular vesicles in cardiovascular diseases: Diagnosis and therapy. Front Cell Dev Biol. 10:8753762022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Dang Y, Hua W, Zhang X, Sun H, Zhang Y, Yu B, Wang S, Zhang M, Kong Z, Pan D, et al: Anti-angiogenic effect of exo-LncRNA TUG1 in myocardial infarction and modulation by remote ischemic conditioning. Basic Res Cardiol. 118:12023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Giacomini E, Scotti GM, Vanni VS, Lazarevic D, Makieva S, Privitera L, Signorelli S, Cantone L, Bollati V, Murdica V, et al: Global transcriptomic changes occur in uterine fluid-derived extracellular vesicles during the endometrial window for embryo implantation. Hum Reprod. 36:2249–2274. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kim KY, Shin KY and Chang KA: Brain-derived exosomal proteins as effective biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomolecules. 11:9802021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Jeyaraman M, Rajendran RL, Muthu S, Jeyaraman N, Sharma S, Jha SK, Muthukanagaraj P, Hong CM, Furtado da Fonseca L, Santos Duarte Lana JF, et al: An update on stem cell and stem cell-derived extracellular vesicle-based therapy in the management of Alzheimer's disease. Heliyon. 9:e178082023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Liu C, Wang J, Hu J, Fu B, Mao Z, Zhang H, Cai G, Chen X and Sun X: Extracellular vesicles for acute kidney injury in preclinical rodent models: a meta-analysis. Stem Cell Res Ther. 11:112020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Tang TT, Lv LL, Lan HY and Liu BC: Extracellular vesicles: Opportunities and challenges for the treatment of renal diseases. Front Physiol. 10:2262019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Burdeyron P, Giraud S, Lepoittevin M, Jordan N, Brishoual S, Jacquard M, Ameteau V, Boildieu N, Lemarie E, Daniel J, et al: Dynamic conditioning of porcine kidney grafts with extracellular vesicles derived from urine progenitor cells: A proof-of-concept study. Clin Transl Med. 14:e700952024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Psaraki A, Ntari L, Karakostas C, Korrou-Karava D and Roubelakis MG: Extracellular vesicles derived from mesenchymal stem/stromal cells: The regenerative impact in liver diseases. Hepatology. 75:1590–1603. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Tieu A, Hu K, Gnyra C, Montroy J, Fergusson DA, Allan DS, Stewart DJ, Thébaud B and Lalu MM: Mesenchymal stromal cell extracellular vesicles as therapy for acute and chronic respiratory diseases: A meta-analysis. J Extracell Vesicles. 10:e121412021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sánchez SV, Otavalo GN, Gazeau F, Silva AKA and Morales JO: Intranasal delivery of extracellular vesicles: A promising new approach for treating neurological and respiratory disorders. J Control Release. 379:489–523. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Jiang Q, Ning F, Jia Q, Wang H, Xue W, Wang J, Wang Y, Zhu Z and Tian L: MiR-148a-3p loaded human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles alleviates silica-induced pulmonary fibrosis by inhibiting β-catenin signaling. Int J Nanomedicine. 20:4319–4336. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Shen Q, Huang Z, Yao J and Jin Y: Extracellular vesicles-mediated interaction within intestinal microenvironment in inflammatory bowel disease. J Adv Res. 37:221–233. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
You B, Yang Y, Wei J, Zhou C and Dong S: Pathogenic and therapeutic roles of extracellular vesicles in sepsis. Front Immunol. 16:15354272025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ding JY, Chen MJ, Wu LF, Shu GF, Fang SJ, Li ZY, Chu XR, Li XK, Wang ZG and Ji JS: Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles in skin wound healing: Roles, opportunities and challenges. Mil Med Res. 10:362023.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wu J, Wu J, Liu Z, Gong Y, Feng D, Xiang W, Fang S, Chen R, Wu Y, Huang S, et al: Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles in joint diseases: Therapeutic effects and underlying mechanisms. J Orthop Translat. 48:53–69. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhuang Y, Jiang S, Yuan C and Lin K: The potential therapeutic role of extracellular vesicles in osteoarthritis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 10:10223682022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chen Y, Li B, Christelle M, Eugene N, Han W, Zhou H, Qiu N, Zhang H and Xu J: Modifying MSCs-derived EVs with esterase-responsive and charge-reversal cationic polymers enhances bone regeneration. iScience. 27:1108012024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kuang H, Dou G, Cheng L, Wang X, Xu H, Liu X, Ding F, Yang X, Liu S, Bao L, et al: Humoral regulation of iron metabolism by extracellular vesicles drives antibacterial response. Nat Metab. 5:111–128. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yudintceva NM, Bogolyubova IO, Muraviov AN, Sheykhov MG, Vinogradova TI, Sokolovich EG, Samusenko IA and Shevtsov MA: Application of the allogenic mesenchymal stem cells in the therapy of the bladder tuberculosis. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 12:e1580–e1593. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ariel BM, Guseinova FM, Vinogradova TI, Zabolotnykh NV, Niaury DA, Yudintceva NM, Vitovskaya ML, Dogonadze MZ, Rubtsova OL and Yablonsky PK: Mesenchymal stem cells of the bone marrow in treatment of genital tuberculosis in rabbits (experimental research with morphological control). Rev Clin Pharm Drug Ther. 15:47–55. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Ikeda G, Santoso MR, Tada Y, Li AM, Vaskova E, Jung JH, O'Brien C, Egan E, Ye J and Yang PC: Mitochondria-rich extracellular vesicles from autologous stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes restore energetics of ischemic myocardium. J Am Coll Cardiol. 77:1073–1088. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Tominaga Y, Kawamura T, Ito E, Takeda M, Harada A, Torigata K, Sakaniwa R, Sawa Y and Miyagawa S: Pleiotropic effects of extracellular vesicles from induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes on ischemic cardiomyopathy: A preclinical study. J Heart Lung Transplant. 43:85–99. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zheng X, Zhang L, Kuang Y, Venkataramani V, Jin F, Hein K, Zafeiriou MP, Lenz C, Moebius W, Kilic E, et al: Extracellular vesicles derived from neural progenitor cells-a preclinical evaluation for stroke treatment in mice. Transl Stroke Res. 12:185–203. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sun C, Sha S, Shan Y, Gao X, Li L, Xing C, Guo Z and Du H: Intranasal delivery of BACE1 siRNA and berberine via engineered stem cell exosomes for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Int J Nanomedicine. 20:5873–5891. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Nan C, Zhang Y, Zhang A, Shi Y, Yan D, Sun Z, Jin Q, Huo H, Zhuo Y and Zhao Z: Exosomes derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells decrease neuroinflammation and facilitate the restoration of nerve function in rats suffering from intracerebral hemorrhage. Mol Cell Biochem. 480:309–323. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chen F, Chen Z, Wu HT, Chen XX, Zhan P, Wei ZY, Ouyang Z, Jiang X, Shen A, Luo MH, et al: Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes attenuate murine cytomegalovirus-infected pneumonia via NF-κB/NLRP3 signaling pathway. Viruses. 16:6192024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Costa-Ferro ZSM, Rocha GV, da Silva KN, Paredes BD, Loiola EC, Silva JD, Santos JLDS, Dias RB, Figueira CP, de Oliveira CI, et al: GMP-compliant extracellular vesicles derived from umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cells: Manufacturing and pre-clinical evaluation in ARDS treatment. Cytotherapy. 26:1013–1025. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Jeong J, Park JK, Shin J, Jung I, Kim HW, Park A, Cho H, Kang SM, Shin S, Park E, et al: Inflammatory cytokine-primed MSC-derived extracellular vesicles ameliorate acute lung injury via enhanced immunomodulation and alveolar repair. Stem Cell Res Ther. 16:4502025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Krishnan A, Harikrishnan VS, Sabareeswaran A and Kasoju N: Human Wharton's Jelly mesenchymal stem cells and their extracellular vesicles in the management of bleomycin-induced lung injury in model animals: A comparative preclinical study focused on histomorphometric analysis. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 20:1184–1197. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Figueroa-Valdés AI, Luz-Crawford P, Herrera-Luna Y, Georges-Calderón N, García C, Tobar HE, Araya MJ, Matas J, Donoso-Meneses D, de la Fuente C, et al: Clinical-grade extracellular vesicles derived from umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cells: Preclinical development and first-in-human intra-articular validation as therapeutics for knee osteoarthritis. J Nanobiotechnology. 23:132025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sarkar S, Barnaby R, Faber Z, Taub L, Roche C, Vietje B, Taatjes DJ, Wargo MJ, Weiss DJ, Bonfield TL, et al: Extracellular vesicles derived from mesenchymal stromal cells reduce pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection and inflammation in mice. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2025.03.30.646208. 2025. | |
|
Mirsanei Z, Jamshidi-Adegani F, Vakilian S, Elumalai P, Hazrati A, Soufihasanabad S, Ahangari F, Karima S, Salmani F, Ebadi Asl P, et al: Extracellular vesicles derived from MSCs carrying dexamethasone alleviate inflammatory damage in septic mice. Eur J Pharmacol. 1005:1780422025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Aghayan AH, Mirazimi Y, Fateh K, Keshtkar A, Rafiee M and Atashi A: Therapeutic effects of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles in sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 20:1480–1500. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Choi HY, Kim TY, Lee M, Kim SH, Jhee JH, Lee YK, Kim HJ and Park HC: Kidney mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles engineered to express erythropoietin improve renal anemia in mice with chronic kidney disease. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 18:980–992. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yuan F, Liu J, Zhong L, Liu P, Li T, Yang K, Gao W, Zhang G, Sun J and Zou X: Enhanced therapeutic effects of hypoxia-preconditioned mesenchymal stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicles in renal ischemic injury. Stem Cell Res Ther. 16:392025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Rani S, Ryan AE, Griffin MD and Ritter T: Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles: Toward cell-free therapeutic applications. Mol Ther. 23:812–823. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Hassan N, Hussein DM, Malak FA, Abdelaziz MA, Boushra MI, Shaalan W and Elzayat EM: Mesenchymal stem cells: A therapeutic approach in fertility restoration in premature ovarian insufficiency. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 21:2089–2102. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Aldoghachi AF, Loh JK, Wang ML, Yang YP, Chien CS, Teh HX, Omar AH, Cheong SK, Yeap SK, Ho WY and Ong AHK: Current developments and therapeutic potentials of exosomes from induced pluripotent stem cells-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J Chin Med Assoc. 86:356–365. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Keshtkar S, Azarpira N and Ghahremani MH: Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles: Novel frontiers in regenerative medicine. Stem Cell Res Ther. 9:632018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Shahryari F, Jafarinia M, Jafarinia M and Azimzadeh M: Immunomodulatory and neuroprotective effects of miR-146a-enriched MSC-derived extracellular vesicles in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Int Immunopharmacol. 166:1155842025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Colombo M, Raposo G and Théry C: Biogenesis, secretion, and intercellular interactions of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 30:255–289. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Favaro E, Carpanetto A, Lamorte S, Fusco A, Caorsi C, Deregibus MC, Bruno S, Amoroso A, Giovarelli M, Porta M, et al: Human mesenchymal stem cell-derived microvesicles modulate T cell response to islet antigen glutamic acid decarboxylase in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia. 57:1664–1673. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Łabędź-Masłowska A, Vergori L, Kędracka-Krok S, Karnas E, Bobis-Wozowicz S, Sekuła-Stryjewska M, Sarna M, Andriantsitohaina R and Zuba-Surma EK: Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles exert pro-angiogenic and pro-lymphangiogenic effects in ischemic tissues by transferring various microRNAs and proteins including ITGa5 and NRP1. J Nanobiotechnology. 22:602024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Xu F, Fei Z, Dai H, Xu J, Fan Q, Shen S, Zhang Y, Ma Q, Chu J, Peng F, et al: Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles with high PD-L1 expression for autoimmune diseases treatment. Adv Mater. 34:e21062652022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Pei L, Li R, Wang X, Xu D, Gong F, Chen W, Zheng X, Liu W, Zhao S, Wang Q, et al: MSCs-derived extracellular vesicles alleviate sepsis-associated liver dysfunction by inhibiting macrophage glycolysis-mediated inflammatory response. Int Immunopharmacol. 128:1115752024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kim H, Lee SK, Hong S, Park TS, Kim J, Kim S and Kim TM: Pan PPAR agonist stimulation of induced MSCs produces extracellular vesicles with enhanced renoprotective effect for acute kidney injury. Stem Cell Res Ther. 15:92024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Manzoor T, Saleem A, Farooq N, Dar LA, Nazir J, Saleem S, Ismail S, Gugjoo MB, Shiekh PA and Ahmad SM: Extracellular vesicles derived from mesenchymal stem cells-a novel therapeutic tool in infectious diseases. Inflamm Regen. 43:172023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Hong S, Kim H, Kim J, Kim S, Park TS and Kim TM: Extracellular vesicles from induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells enhance the recovery of acute kidney injury. Cytotherapy. 26:51–62. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ma M, Zeng J, Zhu M, Li H, Lin T, Yang H, Wei X and Song T: Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells-derived extracellular vesicles ameliorate kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury by suppression of senescent tubular epithelial cells: Experimental study. Int J Surg. 111:394–410. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Shi L, Hu Y, Zeng H, Shi H, Xu W, Sun Y, Chu H, Ji C and Qian H: Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles ameliorate renal interstitial fibrosis via the miR-13474/ADAM17 axis. Sci Rep. 14:177032024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Muraviov AN, Vinogradova TI, Remezova AN, Ariel BM, Gorelova AA, Orlova NV, Yudintceva NM, Esmedliaeva DS, Dyakova ME, Dogonadze MZ, et al: The use of mesenchymal stem cells in the complex treatment of kidney tuberculosis (experimental study). Biomedicines. 10:30622022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Liu M, Wang Z, Ren S and Zhao H: Exosomes derived from Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected MSCs induce a pro-inflammatory response of macrophages. Aging (Albany NY). 13:11595–11609. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhu W, Shi J, Weng B, Zhou Z, Mao X, Pan S, Peng J, Zhang C, Mao H, Li M and Zhao J: EVs from cells at the early stages of chondrogenesis delivered by injectable SIS dECM promote cartilage regeneration. J Tissue Eng. 15:204173142412681892024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Xu J, Ren Z, Niu T and Li S: Epigenetic mechanism of miR-26b-5p-enriched MSCs-EVs attenuates spinal cord injury. Regen Ther. 25:35–48. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Nassar W, El-Ansary M, Sabry D, Mostafa MA, Fayad T, Kotb E, Temraz M, Saad AN, Essa W and Adel H: Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells derived extracellular vesicles can safely ameliorate the progression of chronic kidney diseases. Biomater Res. 20:212016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Grange C, Skovronova R, Marabese F and Bussolati B: Stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles and kidney regeneration. Cells. 8:12402019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Perico L, Morigi M, Rota C, Breno M, Mele C, Noris M, Introna M, Capelli C, Longaretti L, Rottoli D, et al: Human mesenchymal stromal cells transplanted into mice stimulate renal tubular cells and enhance mitochondrial function. Nat Commun. 8:9832017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Jain N, Kalam H, Singh L, Sharma V, Kedia S, Das P, Ahuja V and Kumar D: Mesenchymal stem cells offer a drug-tolerant and immune-privileged niche to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Commun. 11:30622020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Alipoor SD and Elieh-Ali-Komi D: Significance of extracellular vesicles in orchestration of immune responses in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 14:13980772024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Fatima S, Kamble SS, Dwivedi VP, Bhattacharya D, Kumar S, Ranganathan A, Van Kaer L, Mohanty S and Das G: Mycobacterium tuberculosis programs mesenchymal stem cells to establish dormancy and persistence. J Clin Invest. 130:655–661. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Bárcia RN, Santos JM, Filipe M, Teixeira M, Martins JP, Almeida J, Água-Doce A, Almeida SC, Varela A, Pohl S, et al: What makes umbilical cord tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells superior immunomodulators when compared to bone marrow derived mesenchymal stromal cells? Stem Cells Int. 2015:5839842015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Harman RM, Yang S, He MK and Van de Walle GR: Antimicrobial peptides secreted by equine mesenchymal stromal cells inhibit the growth of bacteria commonly found in skin wounds. Stem Cell Res Ther. 8:1572017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Konoshenko MY, Lekchnov EA, Vlassov AV and Laktionov PP: Isolation of extracellular vesicles: General methodologies and latest trends. Biomed Res Int. 2018:85453472018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lane RE, Korbie D, Trau M and Hill MM: Purification protocols for extracellular vesicles. Methods Mol Biol. 1660:111–130. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Cvjetkovic A, Lötvall J and Lässer C: The influence of rotor type and centrifugation time on the yield and purity of extracellular vesicles. J Extracell Vesicles. 3:10.3402/jev.v3.23111. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Abramowicz A, Widlak P and Pietrowska M: Proteomic analysis of exosomal cargo: The challenge of high purity vesicle isolation. Mol Biosyst. 12:1407–1419. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhang Q, Jeppesen DK, Higginbotham JN, Franklin JL and Coffey RJ: Comprehensive isolation of extracellular vesicles and nanoparticles. Nat Protoc. 18:1462–1487. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sidhom K, Obi PO and Saleem A: A review of exosomal isolation methods: Is size exclusion chromatography the best option? Int J Mol Sci. 21:64662020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yang J, Gao X, Xing X, Huang H, Tang Q, Ma S, Xu X, Liang C, Li M, Liao L and Tian W: An isolation system to collect high quality and purity extracellular vesicles from serum. Int J Nanomedicine. 16:6681–6692. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Dehnavi S, Khodadadi A, Asadirad A and Ghadiri A: Loading ovalbumin into mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes as a nanoscale carrier with immunomodulatory potential for allergen-specific immunotherapy. Rep Biochem Mol Biol. 11:626–634. 2023.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Brambilla D, Sola L, Ferretti AM, Chiodi E, Zarovni N, Fortunato D, Criscuoli M, Dolo V, Giusti I, Murdica V, et al: EV separation: Release of intact extracellular vesicles immunocaptured on magnetic particles. Anal Chem. 93:5476–5483. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Nordin JZ, Lee Y, Vader P, Mäger I, Johansson HJ, Heusermann W, Wiklander OPB, Hällbrink M, Seow Y, Bultema JJ, et al: Ultrafiltration with size-exclusion liquid chromatography for high yield isolation of extracellular vesicles preserving intact biophysical and functional properties. Nanomedicine. 11:879–883. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ansari FJ, Tafti HA, Amanzadeh A, Rabbani S, Shokrgozar MA, Heidari R, Behroozi J, Eyni H, Uversky VN and Ghanbari H: Comparison of the efficiency of ultrafiltration, precipitation, and ultracentrifugation methods for exosome isolation. Biochem Biophys Rep. 38:1016682024.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lee H, Kim J, Kim J and Park YJ: Review of the global burden of tuberculosis in 2023: Insights from the WHO global tuberculosis report 2024. Jugan Geongang Gwa Jilbyeong. 18 (11 Suppl):S55–S69. 2025.(In Korean). PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Muneer A, Macrae B, Krishnamoorthy S and Zumla A: Urogenital tuberculosis-epidemiology, pathogenesis and clinical features. Nat Rev Urol. 16:573–598. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Li H, Yin Y, Cao W, Chen S, Chen J, Xing Y and Yang H: Enhanced autophagy and cholesterol efflux in mouse mesenchymal stem cells infected with H37Rv compared to H37Ra. Microb Pathog. 199:1071992025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sun X, Li W, Zhao L, Fan K, Qin F, Shi L, Gao F and Zheng C: Current landscape of exosomes in tuberculosis development, diagnosis, and treatment applications. Front Immunol. 15:14018672024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yan Z, Wang H, Mu L, Hu ZD and Zheng WQ: Regulatory roles of extracellular vesicles in immune responses against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. World J Clin Cases. 9:7311–7318. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Arya R, Shakya H, Chaurasia R, Haque MA and Kim JJ: Exploring the role of extracellular vesicles in the pathogenesis of tuberculosis. Genes (Basel). 15:4342024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Prados-Rosales R, Carreño LJ, Batista-Gonzalez A, Baena A, Venkataswamy MM, Xu J, Yu X, Wallstrom G, Magee DM, LaBaer J, et al: Mycobacterial membrane vesicles administered systemically in mice induce a protective immune response to surface compartments of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. mBio. 5:e01921–14. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Fang Y, Bouari S, Hoogduijn MJ, Ijzermans JNM, de Bruin RWF and Minnee RC: Therapeutic efficacy of extracellular vesicles to suppress allograft rejection in preclinical kidney transplantation models: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 36:1007142022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sershen CL, Salim T and May EE: Investigating the comorbidity of COPD and tuberculosis, a computational study. Front Syst Biol. 3:9400972023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Erokhin VV, Vasil'eva IA, Konopliannikov AG, Chukanov VI, Tsyb AF, Bagdasarian TR, Danilenko AA, Lepekhina LA, Kal'sina S, Semenkova IV and Agaeva EV: Systemic transplantation of autologous mesenchymal stem cells of the bone marrow in the treatment of patients with multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. Probl Tuberk Bolezn Legk. 3–6. 2008.(In Russian). PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Garhyan J, Bhuyan S, Pulu I, Kalita D, Das B and Bhatnagar R: Preclinical and clinical evidence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis persistence in the hypoxic niche of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells after therapy. Am J Pathol. 185:1924–1934. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chenari A, Hazrati A, Hosseini AZ, Motiee M and Soudi S: The effect of mesenchymal stem cell-derived supernatant nasal administration on lung inflammation and immune response in BCG-vaccinated BALB/c mice. Life Sci. 317:1214652023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Khan A, Mann L, Papanna R, Lyu MA, Singh CR, Olson S, Eissa NT, Cirillo J, Das G, Hunter RL and Jagannath C: Mesenchymal stem cells internalize Mycobacterium tuberculosis through scavenger receptors and restrict bacterial growth through autophagy. Sci Rep. 7:150102017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Li Q, Wang C, Gou J, Kitanovski S, Tang X, Cai Y, Zhang C, Zhang X, Zhang Z, Qiu Y, et al: Deciphering lung granulomas in HIV & TB co-infection: Unveiling macrophages aggregation with IL6R/STAT3 activation. Emerg Microbes Infect. 13:23663592024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zuban O and Chotchaev R: Intestinocystoplasty in tuberculosis of the urinary bladder. Exp Clin Urol. 15:115–121. 2022. | |
|
Ji L, Fu Y and Xiong S: Chimeric antigen carried by extracellular vesicles induces stronger protective immunity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Immunobiology. 229:1528342024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lyu L, Jia H, Liu Q, Ma W, Li Z, Pan L and Zhang X: Individualized lipid profile in urine-derived extracellular vesicles from clinical patients with Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections. Front Microbiol. 15:14095522024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Li L, Cheng Y, Emrich S and Schorey J: Activation of endothelial cells by extracellular vesicles derived from Mycobacterium tuberculosis infected macrophages or mice. PLoS One. 13:e01983372018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Arya R, Dabral D, Faruquee HM, Mazumdar H, Patgiri SJ, Deka T, Basumatary R, Kupa RU, Semy C, Kapfo W, et al: Serum small extracellular vesicles proteome of tuberculosis patients demonstrated deregulated immune response. Proteomics Clin Appl. 14:e19000622020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Carranza C, Herrera MT, Guzmán-Beltrán S, Salgado-Cantú MG, Salido-Guadarrama I, Santiago E, Chávez-Galán L, Gutiérrez-González LH and González Y: A dual marker for monitoring MDR-TB treatment: Host-derived miRNAs and M. tuberculosis-derived RNA sequences in serum. Front Immunol. 12:7604682021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chen GZ, Fan FF, Deng SQ, Xia XY, Bian XC, Ren YH and Wei L: Extraction of extracelluar vesicles derived from Mycobacterium tuberculosis and their effect on the production of reactive oxygen species and expression of inflammatory factors in mouse bone marrow-derived dendritic cells. Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 54:122–127. 2023.(In Chinese). PubMed/NCBI | |
|
García-Martínez M, Vázquez-Flores L, Álvarez-Jiménez VD, Castañeda-Casimiro J, Ibáñez-Hernández M, Sánchez-Torres LE, Barrios-Payán J, Mata-Espinosa D, Estrada-Parra S, Chacón-Salinas R, et al: Extracellular vesicles released by J774A.1 macrophages reduce the bacterial load in macrophages and in an experimental mouse model of tuberculosis. Int J Nanomedicine. 14:6707–6719. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Alvarez-Jiménez VD, Leyva-Paredes K, García-Martínez M, Vázquez-Flores L, García-Paredes VG, Campillo-Navarro M, Romo-Cruz I, Rosales-García VH, Castañeda-Casimiro J, González-Pozos S, et al: Extracellular vesicles released from Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected neutrophils promote macrophage autophagy and decrease intracellular mycobacterial survival. Front Immunol. 9:2722018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Cheng Y and Schorey JS: Extracellular vesicles deliver Mycobacterium RNA to promote host immunity and bacterial killing. EMBO Rep. 20:e466132019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Jindal N, Sharma P, Punia S, Dass M, Anthwal D, Gupta RK, Bhalla M, Singhal R, Behera A, Yadav R, et al: Utility of pleural fluid-derived extracellular vesicles as a source of Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens MPT51 and MPT64 for pleural TB diagnosis: A proof-of-concept study. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 150:1025782025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Nguyen VVT, Welsh JA, Tertel T, Choo A, van de Wakker SI, Defourny KAY, Giebel B, Vader P, Padmanabhan J, Lim SK, et al: Inter-laboratory multiplex bead-based surface protein profiling of MSC-derived EV preparations identifies MSC-EV surface marker signatures. J Extracell Vesicles. 13:e124632024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhang J, Qiu X, Lei Y, Chen H, Wu D, Wang T, Sui X, Xiao J, Jiang C, Zhang H, et al: Engineered EVs from LncEEF1G-overexpressing MSCs promote fibrotic liver regeneration by upregulating HGF release from hepatic stellate cells. Exp Mol Med. 57:584–600. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhu L, Wang Q, Guo M, Fang H, Li T, Zhu Y, Jiang H, Xiao P and Hu M: Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes in various chronic liver diseases: Hype or hope? J Inflamm Res. 17:171–189. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Boysen AT, Whitehead B, Revenfeld ALS, Gupta D, Petersen T and Nejsum P: Urine-derived stem cells serve as a robust platform for generating native or engineered extracellular vesicles. Stem Cell Res Ther. 15:2882024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Levy D, Jeyaram A, Born LJ, Chang KH, Abadchi SN, Hsu ATW, Solomon T, Aranda A, Stewart S, He X, et al: Impact of storage conditions and duration on function of native and cargo-loaded mesenchymal stromal cell extracellular vesicles. Cytotherapy. 25:502–509. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Gao WY, Boonyarat C, Samar N, Sethabouppha B and Waiwut P: Multiomics analysis of molecules associated with cancer in mesenchymal-stem-cell-(MSC)-derived exosome-treated hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 46:13296–13310. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Gong S, Li N, Peng Q, Wang F, Du R, Zhang B, Wang J, Han L, Zhang Y, Ning Z, et al: A scalable platform for EPSC-Induced MSC extracellular vesicles with therapeutic potential. Stem Cell Res Ther. 16:4262025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Elnegris HM, Abdelrahman AA and El-Roghy ES: The potential therapeutic effects of exosomes derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells on ileum injury of a rat sepsis model (histological and immunohistochemical study). Ultrastruct Pathol. 48:274–296. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Mardpour S, Hamidieh AA, Taleahmad S, Sharifzad F, Taghikhani A and Baharvand H: Interaction between mesenchymal stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicles and immune cells by distinct protein content. J Cell Physiol. 234:8249–8258. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
You J, Fu Z and Zou L: Mechanism and potential of extracellular vesicles derived from mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of infectious diseases. Front Microbiol. 12:7613382021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |