Effects of TRPM8 on the proliferation and angiogenesis of prostate cancer PC-3 cells in vivo

  • Authors:
    • Guangbin Zhu
    • Xinghuan Wang
    • Zhonghua Yang
    • Hong  Cao
    • Zhe Meng
    • Yongzhi Wang
    • Dong Chen
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: September 2, 2011     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2011.410
  • Pages: 1213-1217
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Prostate cancer is a significant health concern. In the early stages, prostate cancer cells depend on androgens for growth and survival, hence androgen-ablation therapy at this time may be effective in causing tumor regression. However, treatment options for advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancers are still relatively inefficient. This study aimed to investigate the possible effects of TRPM8 on the proliferation and angiogenesis of androgen-independent cancer PC-3 cells in vivo. Thirty male nude mice were divided into three groups: the PC-3, PC-3-vector and PC-3-TRPM8 groups. PC-3, PC-3-vector and PC-3-TRPM8 cells were respectively inoculated in the right flank to establish a transplanted tumor model. The mice were treated daily for four weeks and each group was examined by histology and immunohistochemical staining for CD34, FAK and PCNA. A CD34 marked microvascular density (MVD) test was performed. Western blot analysis was used to detect the VEGF protein expression level. Compared to the PC-3 and PC-3-vector groups, the PC-3-TRPM8 group revealed a decrease in tumor volume (P=0.000 and P=0.000, respectively), MVD (P=0.045 and P=0.041, respectively), VEGF (P=0.000 and P=0.000, respectively), FAK and PCNA. The correlation between MVD and VEGF was positive (r=0.419; P=0.021). These data show that the overexpression of TRPM8 had a negative effect on the proliferation and angiogenesis progression of PC-3 cells in vivo.

Introduction

Prostate cancer (PC) is a major health problem, accounting for a quarter of the new cancer cases diagnosed in adult males in America each year, and accounting for approximately 9% of cancer-related mortality in the same population (1). In the early stages, prostate cancer cells depend on androgens for growth and survival, hence androgen-ablation therapy at this time may be effective in causing tumor regression. However, treatment options for advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancers (HRPC) are still relatively inefficient (2).

The role of Ca2+ is well established in the majority of the cell signaling pathways involved in carcinogenesis (3). Calcium-permeable channels are potential candidates for involvement in Ca2+ homeostasis in prostate cancer cells. One transient receptor potential (TRP) superfamily of cation channels is of particular interest. The human trpm8 gene, initially known as trp-p8, has been shown to be mainly expressed in the prostate and is overexpressed in prostate cancer (4). The precise physiological function of the TRPM8 channel in normal and cancer prostate tissue remains unknown. TRPM8 expression is markedly upregulated in PC and in other tumors, suggesting a significant role in carcinogenesis (4). It has been shown that anti-androgen therapy greatly reduces the expression of TRPM8, suggesting that TRPM8 is regulated by androgens (5). TRPM8 expression-silencing experiments using small interfering RNA (siRNA) suggested that Ca2+ influx through this channel plays an essential role in cellular Ca2+ homeostasis in prostate epithelial cells and is involved in cell survival (6). Our previous study revealed that PC-3 cells express an extremely low level of TRPM8, and that overexpression of TRPM8 has a negative effect on the proliferation and malignant progression of PC-3 cells in vitro (7).

However, upon administration of anti-androgen therapy, the prostate epithelial cells downregulate the expression of androgen receptor (AR) and, consequently, that of TRPM8 mRNA. Prostate cancer and metastasis then progress into an androgen-independent (AI) stage, resulting in cancer relapse with a more aggressive phenotype.

It is well known that angiogenesis is essential for tumor progression and metastasis (8). In relation to PC, it has also been suggested that the degree of tumor angiogenesis is correlated to clinical stage (9). Various endothelial growth factors have been shown to play crucial roles in tumor angiogenesis. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is one of the most potent and specific angiogenic factors. Immunohistochemical studies have revealed that PC cells produce VEGF (10,11) and that VEGF expression correlates with microvessel density (MVD) and tumor progression (12).

This study was designed to investigate the possible effects of TRPM8 on the proliferation and angiogenesis of androgen-independent cancer PC-3 cells in vivo.

Materials and methods

Cell culture

PC-3 cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). PC-3-m8 cells were previously established in our laboratory. Cells were cultured as previously described (7).

Animals

Thirty 5-week old male nude mice (weight range 15–18 g) were obtained from the Hubei Provincial Experimental Animal Center, China. All animal study protocols were approved by internationally accepted principles and the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of Wuhan University.

Animal grouping

The animals were randomized into 3 groups: Group A (PC-3 cell group), group B (PC-3-vector group) and group C (PC-3-TRPM8 group).

Tumor models

PC-3, PC-3-vector and PC-3-TRPM8 cells growing exponentially were each implanted into 10 male nude mice by subcutaneous (SC) injection of 1×106 cells (in 200 μl phosphate-buffered saline) into the right flank.

Observation on growing condition of mice

The inoculated mice were fed in the Experimental Animal Center of Wuhan University and monitored daily for clinical signs. Tumor measurements were performed every three days and the tumor volume was calculated according to the formula: V=(π/6)(d1×d2)3/2 (13), where d1 and d2 are perpendicular tumor diameters.

Sample collection

Twenty-eight days after the inoculation of cells, each mouse was injected with 10% chloral hydrate for hyperanesthesia. The mice were sacrificed by decapitation and tumors were removed from the body. One section of the tumor was fixed in formalin for paraffin embedding and one section was snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C.

H&E staining assay

Paraffin-embedded tissues were cut into 4-μm slices and deparaffinated in dimethylbenzene for 5–10 min. Then the tissues were put into 100, 95, 85 and 70% alcohol for 2–5 min in turn and finally washed with distilled water and immersed in staining solution. Following hematoxylin staining for 5–15 min, the excess stain solution on the slides was washed off, and color separation with 0.5–1% hydrochloride alcohol was performed for approximately 10 sec. After washing in running water for 15–30 min, the tissues were stained by 0.1–0.5% eosin for 1–5 min. The tissues were then dehydrated with 75, 85, 95 and 100% alcohol for 2–3 min in turn prior to hyalinization with dimethylbenzene twice for approximately 10 min in total. Finally, neutral gum was dropped onto the slip, and then the slip was covered by a slide. As a result, nuclei were stained blue and cytoplasm and collagen fibers were stained various shades of red or pink.

Immunohistochemical assay

The streptavidin-peroxidase-biotin (SP) method was used for immunohistochemistry. The slides were deparaffinized conventionally and were immersed in 3% H2O2 for 10 min to block endogenous peroxidase. Following antigen retrieval by microwave, newborn calf serum was added for blocking for 10 min. The primary antibody (1:50) was then added for incubation overnight (4°C) and secondary antibodies were added for incubation for 20 min at room temperature. Then streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase solution was used for incubation for 30 min and 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) was added to the chlorate for 15 min. This was followed by hematoxylin staining, dehydration and hyalinization, and the slip was then covered.

CD34 marked MVD test

CD34 is expressed in vascular endothelial cells, tumor cytoplasm or membrane and is used as a specific marker of vascular endothelial cells. By immunohistochemical staining it reveals a distribution of brown or light brown solid bud-like or cord-like blood vessels. Low magnification (x100) was used to review the microvascular staining in each section and determine the maximum microvascular staining regions, and then the vascular endothelial cells or cell groups which appeared brown at high magnification (x200) were counted. Each cell group counted as independent micrangium on condition of an obvious distinction from neighboring micrangium and tumorous cell. Five counts of micrangium of each slide at high magnification vision were recorded, and the average was taken as the MVD.

Detection of VEGF protein expression by Western blotting

One hundred milligrams of tumor tissue was obtained. The protein lysate was added according to quality/volume (w/v, mg/μl) at a concentration of 1:5, fully homogenized, placed on ice for 30 min and then centrifuged for 5 min at 260 × g. The total protein content was measured using a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) kit. The protein expression of VEGF and β-actin was assayed using Western blot analysis using anti-VEGF-specific and anti-β-actin-specific antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA).

Statistical analysis

Measurement data were shown as the mean ± SD. Groups were compared with the one-way ANOVA analysis. The Spearman coefficent was used to analyse the correlation between MVD and VEGF. P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. All of the data were analyzed with SPSS 17.0.

Results

Observation on mice growing conditions and behavior

In group C, the response to stimuli, activity level, and appetite of each mouse was similar to that in groups A and B, and the body weight did not change significantly (data not shown).

Observation on tumor growth

The tumor formation rate in each group was 100%. The tumor growth was infiltrative with a round or oval shape. The tumor volume in group C was less than that of groups A and B, and there was a difference in the volume of the graft between group C and group A or B (P=0.000 and P=0.000, respectively; Fig. 1).

Histopathologic observation

Following H&E staining, the transplanted tumors in each group revealed glands of unequal size, which integrated to become lamellar, solid-like or acne-like accompanied with diffuse infiltration when observed under a light microscope. Pathological caryokinesis and low-degree differentiation implied a high degree of malignancy. There was no difference in the Gleason score between the three groups (P>0.05; Table I).

Table I

Comparison of Gleason score in each group (values are presented as the mean ± SD).

Table I

Comparison of Gleason score in each group (values are presented as the mean ± SD).

GroupGleason score
PC-38.7±0.48
PC-3-vector8.7±0.48a
PC-3-TRPM88.4±0.52b

a Compared with PC-3 group, P>0.05 (P=1);

b Compared with PC-3 and PC-3-vector group, P>0.05 (P=0.186).

MVD count of the different groups

To evaluate tumor neovascularization, we immunostained tissue samples using a CD34 antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK). CD34 is a cell surface sialomucin widely used as a marker of most vascular endothelial cells, including those of capillaries in the majority of tissues. In the present study, the MVD in groups A and B was found to be higher than that in group C (P=0.045 and P=0.041, respectively; Fig. 2G, H and I; Table II).

Table II

MVD values of tumor in each group (values are presented as the mean ± SD).

Table II

MVD values of tumor in each group (values are presented as the mean ± SD).

GroupMVD in tumor
PC-338.82±12.11
PC-3-vector37.50± 9.97a
PC-3-TRPM829.66± 6.04b,c

a Compared with PC-3 group, P>0.05 (P=0.983);

b Compared with PC-3 group, P<0.05 (P=0.045);

c Compared with PC-3-vector group, P<0.05 (P=0.041).

Expression of VEGF protein in each group

All groups revealed VEGF protein expression. The expression of VEGF protein in groups A and B was higher than that in group C (P=0.000 and P=0.000, respectively; Fig. 3).

Relationship between MVD and VEGF protein expression in each group

MVD and VEGF expression in tumor tissue had a correlation coefficient of r=0.419 (P=0.021) for all three groups.

Expression of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in each group

FAK is a non-receptor protein tyrosine kinase that regulates adhesion-dependent cell signaling (14). In prostate cancer, FAK is known primarily for its role in cell motility and cytoskeletal rearrangement, as supported by in vivo and in vitro evidence (15). PCNA is a nuclear protein synthesized in the G1/S phase and plays a significant role in DNA replication. PCNA expression is low in non-dividing cells, but increases greatly in proliferating and transformed cells. In the present study, anti-FAK-pY397-specific (Biosource, Camarillo, CA, USA) and anti-PCNA-specific (Abcam) antibodies were used. The expression of FAK and PCNA in groups A and B was higher than that in group C (Fig. 2A, B, C, J, K and L).

Discussion

Recent studies have focused on the role of TRPM8, rendering it a novel molecular target potentially useful in the diagnosis and treatment of PC. The channel is activated by voltage, cold temperatures and cooling compounds, such as menthol and icilin (16). Our previous results indicated that the overexpression of TRPM8 has a negative effect on the proliferation and malignant progression of PC-3 cells in vitro (7). Similarly, Gkika et al (17) have demonstrated that PC-3 cells artificially overexpressing TRPM8 have reduced motility, suggesting a possible connection between TRPM8 activity and reduced metastatic potential. In this study, the tumor volume in group C was less than that in groups A and B, suggesting that the overexpression of TRPM8 possibly has a negative effect on the proliferation of PC-3 cells in vivo.

It is well established that the growth and dissemination of solid tumors is dependent on angiogenesis (18). Human VEGF mRNA is transcribed from eight exons of a single gene and is alternatively spliced into at least six mRNAs, which give rise to the mature proteins of 121, 145, 165, 183, 189 and 206 amino acids. VEGF121 and VEGF165 are the best characterized and are the most abundant in normal tissues, including blood vessels. As with most tumors, prostate tumors overexpress VEGF, thereby promoting the development of tumor neovascularization (19). Certain studies using immunohistochemistry have reported an increased expression of total hVEGF protein in human prostate tumors, when compared with normal tissue or preinvasive prostate lesions (20). Our results revealed protein expression of VEGF165 in each group, but VEGF121 was not detected. This lack of detection may be because VEGF165 has a greater molecular weight and is expressed more widely. Furthermore, in this study, the VEGF expression level of group C was lower than that of groups A and B (P=0.00 and P=0.00, respectively).

MVD is a prognostic marker for various tumors, including prostate cancer (21). In prostate cancer, MVD is correlated with the development of metastases, clinical stage and overall patient survival (22). In addition, the progression of prostate cancer into the AI state has been shown to be associated with increased angiogenesis (23); thus, antiangiogenic therapy may be a possible means of improving treatment for patients with HRPC. MVD is a quantitative description of angiogenesis. In this study, the MVD of group C was significantly decreased compared to that of groups A and B (P=0.045 and P=0.041, respectively; Fig. 2G, H and I; Table II), which, coupled with the results of the expression of VEGF, indicated that TRPM8 may have a negative effect on the angiogenesis of PC-3 cells in vivo.

PCNA is a nuclear protein and plays a significant role in DNA replication. The expression level of PCNA is closely correlated to the cell state, which means that the level of PCNA expression correlates with the degree of malignancy, invasion and metastasis in cancer cells. Thus, PCNA is a significant evaluative marker for tumor growth and prognosis (24). FAK is a non-receptor protein tyrosine kinase that regulates adhesion-dependent cell signaling (14). FAK expression is increased in prostate cancer cell lines (25), and an increased expression correlates with enhanced motility and tumorigenicity (26). Our previous study indicated that overexpression of TRPM8, through inactivation of FAK, reduced the motility of PC-3 cells in vitro (7). In this study, we have further shown that TRPM8 inhibits the expression of FAK in vivo. The results of this study have shown that the expression of FAK and PCNA in group C was lower than that in groups A and B (Fig. 2J, K and L). Coupled with the results of tumor volume in each group, the TRPM8 channel may mediate the repair and synthesis of DNA, and may, through inactivation of FAK, have a negative effect on proliferation. However, there was no difference in the Gleason score of each group, and the reason for this remains to be determined, but possibly lies in the limited time taken for the graft to grow.

In conclusion, this study demonstrates that the overexpression of TRPM8 had a negative effect on the proliferation and angiogenesis progression of PC-3 cells in vivo. Therefore, for patients in the AI stage, although there is currently no successful therapy, the activation of the existing channels or the overexpression of the channel may serve as a potential alternative treatment and should be further investigated.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (no. 20103030101000213).

References

1 

Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J and Thun MJ: Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 59:225–249. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Martel CL, Gumerlock PH, Meyers FJ and Lara PN: Current strategies in the management of hormone refractory prostate cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 29:171–187. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Berridge MJ, Lipp P and Bootman MD: The versatility and universality of calcium signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 1:11–21. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Tsavaler L, Shapero MH, Morkowski S and Laus R: Trp-p8, a novel prostate-specific gene, is up-regulated in prostate cancer and other malignancies and shares high homology with transient receptor potential calcium channel proteins. Cancer Res. 61:3760–3769. 2001.

5 

Henshall SM, Afar DE, Hiller J, et al: Survival analysis of genome-wide gene expression profiles of prostate cancers identifies new prognostic targets of disease relapse. Cancer Res. 63:4196–4203. 2003.PubMed/NCBI

6 

Zhang L and Barritt GJ: Evidence that TRPM8 is an androgen-dependent Ca2+ channel required for the survival of prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res. 64:8365–8373. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Yang ZH, Wang XH, Wang HP and Hu LQ: Effects of TRPM8 on the proliferation and motility of prostate cancer PC-3 cells. Asian J Androl. 11:157–165. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Folkman J: Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications. N Engl J Med. 285:1182–1186. 1971. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Brawer MK, Deering RE, Brown M, Preston SD and Bigler SA: Predictors of pathologic stage in prostatic carcinoma. The role of neovascularity. Cancer. 73:678–687. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Ferrer FA, Miller LJ, Andrawis RI, et al: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in human prostate cancer: in situ and in vitro expression of VEGF by human prostate cancer cells. J Urol. 157:2329–2333. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Jackson MW, Bentel JM and Tilley WD: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 157:2323–2328. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Borre M, Nerstrom B and Overgaard J: Association between immunohistochemical expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), VEGF-expressing neuroendocrine-differentiated tumor cells, and outcome in prostate cancer patients subjected to watchful waiting. Clin Cancer Res. 6:1882–1890. 2000.

13 

Warri AM, Huovinen RL, Laine AM, Martikainen PM and Harkonen PL: Apoptosis in toremifene-induced growth inhibition of human breast cancer cells in vivo and in vitro. J Natl Cancer Inst. 85:1412–1418. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Parsons JT, Slack-Davis J, Tilghman R and Roberts WG: Focal adhesion kinase: targeting adhesion signaling pathways for therapeutic intervention. Clin Cancer Res. 14:627–632. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Chang YM, Kung HJ and Evans CP: Nonreceptor tyrosine kinases in prostate cancer. Neoplasia. 9:90–100. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Voets T, Owsianik G and Nilius B: Trpm8. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 329–344. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Gkika D, Flourakis M, Lemonnier L and Prevarskaya N: PSA reduces prostate cancer cell motility by stimulating TRPM8 activity and plasma membrane expression. Oncogene. 29:4611–4616. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Liotta LA, Steeg PS and Stetler-Stevenson WG: Cancer metastasis and angiogenesis: an imbalance of positive and negative regulation. Cell. 64:327–336. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Ferrer FA, Miller LJ, Lindquist R, et al: Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors in human prostate cancer. Urology. 54:567–572. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Mazzucchelli R, Montironi R, Santinelli A, Lucarini G, Pugnaloni A and Biagini G: Vascular endothelial growth factor expression and capillary architecture in high-grade PIN and prostate cancer in untreated and androgen-ablated patients. Prostate. 45:72–79. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Hollingsworth HC, Kohn EC, Steinberg SM, Rothenberg ML and Merino MJ: Tumor angiogenesis in advanced stage ovarian carcinoma. Am J Pathol. 147:33–41. 1995.PubMed/NCBI

22 

Weidner N, Carroll PR, Flax J, Blumenfeld W and Folkman J: Tumor angiogenesis correlates with metastasis in invasive prostate carcinoma. Am J Pathol. 143:401–409. 1993.PubMed/NCBI

23 

Kosaka T, Miyajima A, Takayama E, et al: Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist as an angiogenic inhibitor in prostate cancer. Prostate. 67:41–49. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Tanaka S, Haruma K, Tatsuta S, et al: Proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression correlates with the metastatic potential of submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma. Oncology. 52:134–139. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Lacoste J, Aprikian AG and Chevalier S: Focal adhesion kinase is required for bombesin-induced prostate cancer cell motility. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 235:51–61. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Slack JK, Adams RB, Rovin JD, Bissonette EA, Stoker CE and Parsons JT: Alterations in the focal adhesion kinase/Src signal transduction pathway correlate with increased migratory capacity of prostate carcinoma cells. Oncogene. 20:1152–1163. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

November-December 2011
Volume 2 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Zhu G, Wang X, Yang Z, Cao H, Meng Z, Wang Y and Chen D: Effects of TRPM8 on the proliferation and angiogenesis of prostate cancer PC-3 cells in vivo. Oncol Lett 2: 1213-1217, 2011
APA
Zhu, G., Wang, X., Yang, Z., Cao, H., Meng, Z., Wang, Y., & Chen, D. (2011). Effects of TRPM8 on the proliferation and angiogenesis of prostate cancer PC-3 cells in vivo. Oncology Letters, 2, 1213-1217. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2011.410
MLA
Zhu, G., Wang, X., Yang, Z., Cao, H., Meng, Z., Wang, Y., Chen, D."Effects of TRPM8 on the proliferation and angiogenesis of prostate cancer PC-3 cells in vivo". Oncology Letters 2.6 (2011): 1213-1217.
Chicago
Zhu, G., Wang, X., Yang, Z., Cao, H., Meng, Z., Wang, Y., Chen, D."Effects of TRPM8 on the proliferation and angiogenesis of prostate cancer PC-3 cells in vivo". Oncology Letters 2, no. 6 (2011): 1213-1217. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2011.410