Open Access

Phase II trial of capecitabine combined with docetaxel in previously treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A randomized controlled study

  • Authors:
    • Qiang Lin
    • Fan-Jie Meng
    • Yue'e Liu
    • Na Wang
    • Xiao-Cang Ren
    • Xue-Ji Chen
    • Xiao‑Hui  Ge
    • Chao-Xing Liu
    • Jing Hu
    • Dong-Ying Wang
    • Bin Cao
    • Yannan Zhao
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: January 19, 2012     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2012.575
  • Pages: 761-766
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Docetaxel alone has been confirmed to be beneficial to patients with advanced previously treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the duration and survival time is short. The study of two-agent combination regimens has important clinical significance. We conducted this randomized controlled phase II trial to comparatively evaluate the efficacy and side effects of capecitabine combined with docetaxel in previously treated patients with NSCLC. Patients with previously treated NSCLC who failed first-line chemotherapy were randomized into two groups; one received capecitabine combined with docetaxel (XT group) and the other received docetaxel alone (T group). Patients in the XT group received chemotherapy as follows: capecitabine 625 mg/m2, p.o. bid, days 5-18; and docetaxel 30 mg/m2, days 1 and 8, while patients in the T group received docetaxel 35 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8. The primary endpoint was time to progression (TTP), and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), response rate (RR) and disease control rate (DCR). Forty-eight patients were recruited (23 in the XT group and 25 in the T group). TTP, median survival time (MST) and 1-year OS rate in the XT group and the T group were 7 months, 12 months, 47.6% and 3 months, 12 months, 39.6%, respectively. The TTP in the XT group was significantly longer compared to that in the T group (χ2=4.763, p=0.029). The RR and DCR in the XT group and T group were 13.0% (3/23), 78.3% (18/23) and 12.0% (3/25), 76% (19/25), respectively. The difference was not significant (p>0.05). The major side effects observed in the two groups were neutropenia, fatigue and nausea, and toxicities were mild to modest. No severe cases of hand‑foot syndrome were observed in the XT group. In conclusion, compared with docetaxel alone, capecitabine combined with docetaxel for patients with previously treated NSCLC achieved a significantly longer TTP and this regimen was well tolerated. The relatively high median TTP, 1-year OS rate and DCR encourage further evaluation of this regimen in a randomized phase III trial.

Related Articles

Journal Cover

April 2012
Volume 3 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Lin Q, Meng F, Liu Y, Wang N, Ren X, Chen X, Ge XH, Liu C, Hu J, Wang D, Wang D, et al: Phase II trial of capecitabine combined with docetaxel in previously treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A randomized controlled study. Oncol Lett 3: 761-766, 2012
APA
Lin, Q., Meng, F., Liu, Y., Wang, N., Ren, X., Chen, X. ... Zhao, Y. (2012). Phase II trial of capecitabine combined with docetaxel in previously treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A randomized controlled study. Oncology Letters, 3, 761-766. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2012.575
MLA
Lin, Q., Meng, F., Liu, Y., Wang, N., Ren, X., Chen, X., Ge, X., Liu, C., Hu, J., Wang, D., Cao, B., Zhao, Y."Phase II trial of capecitabine combined with docetaxel in previously treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A randomized controlled study". Oncology Letters 3.4 (2012): 761-766.
Chicago
Lin, Q., Meng, F., Liu, Y., Wang, N., Ren, X., Chen, X., Ge, X., Liu, C., Hu, J., Wang, D., Cao, B., Zhao, Y."Phase II trial of capecitabine combined with docetaxel in previously treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A randomized controlled study". Oncology Letters 3, no. 4 (2012): 761-766. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2012.575