p53, MDM2, eIF4E and EGFR expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma and their correlation with clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis: A retrospective study

  • Authors:
    • Peng Zhang
    • Song‑Ke Wu
    • Ying Wang
    • Zi‑Xuan Fan
    • Chu‑Rong Li
    • Mei Feng
    • Peng Xu
    • Wei‑Dong Wang
    • Jin‑Yi Lang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: October 24, 2014     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2014.2631
  • Pages: 113-118
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

In the present study, the expression of p53, mouse double minute 2 homolog (MDM2), eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) were investigated in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and the correlation between their expression and clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis was analyzed. The medical records of 96 NPC patients who had undergone biopsy prior to radical radiotherapy and chemotherapy between 2005 and 2009 were reviewed, retrospectively. All patients received intensity‑modulated radiotherapy with concurrent platinum‑based chemotherapy. Patients were followed‑up for three years. Streptavidin‑peroxidase immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate the expression of p53, MDM2, eIF4E and EGFR in NPC biopsy specimens, and the association between their expression and clinical parameters and survival was analyzed. The p53, MDM2, eIF4E and EGFR expression rates were 65.6% (63/96), 79.16% (76/96), 77.08% (74/96) and 89.5% (86/96), respectively. p53 (χ2,20.322; P=0.001) and EGFR (χ2,8.337; P=0.005) expression were found to correlate with T stage, whereas MDM2 (χ2,16.361; P=0.001) expression was found to correlate with lymph node metastasis. p53 expression was found to inversely correlate with MDM2 expression (r, ‑3.24; P<0.05). Three‑year survival rates were lower in p53‑positive (76.2%) patients when compared with p53‑negative (93.9%) patients. In addition, three‑year survival rates were lower in EGFR‑positive (75.8%) patients than in EGFR‑negative patients (91.2%). The Cox proportional‑hazards regression model revealed that p53 (β,‑0.455; χ2,5.491; P=0.019) and EGFR (β, 3.93; χ2, 11.95; P=0.001) expression were independent prognostic factors. Thus, it was hypothesized that p53 and EGFR expression present potential unfavorable prognostic markers for patients with NPC.

Introduction

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is the most commonly diagnosed type of head and neck cancer in Southeast Asia, with a reported annual incidence of 30–80 cases per 100,000 individuals in endemic regions (1). The p53 tumor suppressor gene is one of the most frequently studied genes. p53 mutations or deletions occur with a high frequency in the majority of tumor types and are associated with malignant transformation and tumor progression (2,3). Mouse double minute 2 homolog (MDM2) is an important negative regulator of the p53 pathway and its overexpression has been associated with tumor invasion and metastasis (4). Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E), a proto-oncogene, is important in translational regulation and its overexpression selectively increases the mRNA translation of proteins associated with tumor growth, invasion and metastasis. eIF4E overexpression has been identified in various malignant tumors, including cervical, ovarian, esophageal, lung and liver cancer. Previous studies have shown that eIF4E is overexpressed in ~100% of head and neck cancers and has been found to correlate with poor prognosis (57). The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), which is encoded by the c-erbB-1 proto-oncogene, is a member of the ErbB family of protein tyrosine kinase receptors and is involved in the regulation of cellular metabolism, growth, migration and differentiation. EGFR is overexpressed in numerous cancer types, including non-small cell lung, breast, prostate and colorectal cancer (8). Therefore, EGFR has become a key target for molecular-based therapies.

The aim of this retrospective study was to examine p53, MDM2, eIF4E and EGFR expression, and their association with clinical characteristics and survival rates in 96 cases of NPC.

Materials and methods

Patients and treatment

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Sichuan Provincial Cancer Hospital (Chengdu, China). A total of 96 patients with complete medical records, who were treated at Sichuan Provincial Cancer Hospital (Chengdu, China) between 2005 and 2009 were included in the study. The patients consisted of 74 male and 22 female individuals aged between 30 and 77 years (mean age ± standard deviation, 49.9±10.92 years). NPC tissue samples were obtained prior to radiotherapy and chemotherapy using an electronic nasopharyngoscope. All tumor tissue samples were fixed in 10% formalin, embedded in paraffin and cut into 4-μm-thick sections. All patients received intensity-modulated radiotherapy on nasopharyngeal areas, skull basal lesions and positive neck lymph nodes. The following radiotherapy dosages were administered over 28 to 33 sessions: Gross tumor volume (GTV)nx, 66–76 Gy; GTVln, 60–70 Gy; clinical target volume (CTV)1, 60–66 Gy; CTV2, 54–60 Gy; and CTVln, 50–55 Gy. The Cobalt-60 or 6 megavoltage X-ray conventional anterior neck half-field technique was used with a dose of 46–50 Gy for radiotherapy of the lower neck and supraclavicular target regions (9). All patients also underwent concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Induction chemotherapy regimens included docetaxel (75 mg/m2 on day 1) in combination with cisplatin (100 mg/m2 on days 1–3) and cisplatin (100 mg/m2 on days 1–3) in combination with fluorouracil (750 mg/m2 on days 1–4). Concurrent chemotherapy regimens included cisplatin alone (100 mg/m2 on days 1–3) and cisplatin (100 mg/m2 on days 1–3) in combination with fluorouracil (750 mg/m2 on days 1–4). Induction and concurrent chemotherapy comprised of one cycle every 21 days. Supplementary chemotherapy regimens were the same as those used for induction chemotherapy. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Patient follow-up

All patients were followed-up for between three and six years. During the first year of treatment, patients had one follow-up session every three months. During the first year of treatment patients were followed up every three months. During the second and thurd years following treatment, follow-up was performed every six months. After the third year, follow-up was then performed annually. The follow-up sessions involved indirect nasopharyngoscopy, nasopharyngeal and neck computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging, abdominal B-mode ultrasonography, chest radiography and blood tests.

Immunohistochemistry

p53, MDM2, EIF4E and EGFR expression were determined by immunohistochemistry using the histostain-streptavidin peroxidase kit (#95-9943; Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Archived paraffin-embedded sections of NPC tumor tissues (4 μm) were deparaffinized and rehydrated. Antigen retrieval was performed using 0.01 M citrate buffer solution (pH 9.0) under pressurized steam for 10 min. The sections were then cooled, washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), blocked with 5% serum and incubated with mouse anti-human monoclonal p53 (1:500 dilution), mouse anti-human monoclonal MDM2 (1:1,000 dilution), rabbit anti-human polyloclonal EIF4E (1:1,000 dilution) and mouse anti-human monoclonal EGFR (1:1,000 dilution) primary antibodies (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) ab1101, ab3110, ab1126, ab131498) overnight at 4°C. After washing with PBS, the tissue samples were incubated with biotinylated goat anti-mouse polyclonal IgG secondary antibody for 60 min at 37°C. Next, the samples were washed with PBS, stained with diaminobenzidine solution, counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated and sealed. Positive NPC tissue sections were used as a positive control and tissue sections incubated with PBS instead of primary antibodies were used as negative controls. The percentage of positive cells was quantitated by counting 100 cells in four random microscopic fields (Olympus BH2; Olympus Corporation, Tokoy, Japan). Immunostaining was categorized into four groups according to the percentage of positive cells: (−), <5% positive cells; (+), 5–25% positive cells; (++), 26–50% positive cells; and (+++), ≥51% positive cells. Negative expression was represented by (−) and positive expression by (+) to (+++).

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software, version 17.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Differences in count data were analyzed using the χ2 test, and Spearman’s rank correlation test was used for correlational analysis. The Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to calculate survival rates. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Expression of p53, MDM2, EGFR, and eIF4E in NPC

The expression of p53, MDM2, EGFR and eIF4E in NPC was found to be localized in the nucleus. The expression levels of p53, MDM2, EGFR and eIF4E were 65.6% (63/96), 79.16% (76/96), 89.5% (86/96) and 77.08% (74/96), respectively.

Association between p53, MDM2, EGFR and eIF4E expression and T stage, clinical stage and lymph node metastasis

The expression levels of p53 and EGFR were significantly associated with NPC T stage, according to the 2002 Union for International Cancer Control staging system (Tables I and II) (10). p53 and EGFR expression levels were significantly lower in early T1 and T2 stages than in late T3 and T4 stages (p53; χ2,20.322; P=0.001; EGFR: χ2, 8.337; P=0.005). The expression levels of p53 and EGFR were also significantly associated with clinical stage (Tables I and II). The expression levels of p53 and EGFR in stage I+II NPC were significantly lower than that in stages III+IV (p53: χ2,4.809; P=0.037; EGFR: χ2, 15.128; P=0.001). Furthermore, MDM2 expression levels were significantly higher in NPC patients with lymph node metastasis than in those without lymph node metastasis (χ2, 16.361; P=0.001) (Table I). However T stage, clinical stage and lymph node metastasis were not associated with eIF4E expression.

Table I

Association between p53 and MDM2 expression and the clinical characteristics of 96 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.

Table I

Association between p53 and MDM2 expression and the clinical characteristics of 96 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.

p53MDM2


Clinical characteristicsNo. of cases+ to +++χ2 valueP-value+ to +++χ2 valueP-value
T stage20.3220.0011.7480.215
 T1+2455401223
 T3+4512823853
Lymph node metastasis0.1570.73216.3610.001
 No104673
 Yes8629571373
Clinical stage4.8090.0370.9760.366
 I+II21318615
 III+IV7530451461

[i] MDM2, mouse double minute 2 homolog.

Table II

Association between EGFR and eIF4E expression and the clinical characteristics of 96 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.

Table II

Association between EGFR and eIF4E expression and the clinical characteristics of 96 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.

EGFReIF4E


Clinical characteristicsNo. of cases+ to +++χ2 valueP-value+ to +++χ2 valueP-value
T stage8.3370.0054.4040.051
 T1+245936639
 T3+4511501635
Lymph node metastasis1.0990.2780.3170.691
 No102837
 Yes868781967
Clinical stage15.1280.0011.6510.242
 I+II21714714
 III+IV753721560

[i] EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; eIF4E, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E.

Association between p53 and MDM2 expression in NPC

Spearman’s rank correlational analysis revealed a significant negative correlation between the expression levels of p53 and MDM2 (r, −3.24; P<0.05).

Association between p53, MDM2, EGFR and eIF4E expression and survival rate

The three-year disease-free survival and overall survival (OS) rates for the patient population were 73.9 and 84.4%, respectively. The three-year OS rates were 76.2 and 93.9% in patients with p53-positive and -negative expression, respectively, and 75.8% and 91.2% in patients with EGFR-positive and -negative expression, respectively. Therefore, positive expression of p53 (χ2, 4.682; P=0.046) and EGFR (χ2, 5.682; P=0.046) was associated with a poor prognosis (Fig. 1). Cox regression model multivariate analysis revealed that p53 (β, −0.455; χ2, 5.491; P=0.019) and EGFR (β, 3.93; χ2, 11.95; P=0.001) were both independent prognostic factors for survival in NPC. By contrast, MDM2 and eIF4E expression were not associated with survival in NPC.

Discussion

NPC is a common malignant tumor in China and the standard treatment is radiation therapy. Following radiotherapy, the five-year survival rate is ~40–50% (11). Therefore, it is important to investigate novel adjuvant treatments to improve the five-year survival rates of patients with NPC. With the development of biological therapies for tumors, molecular targeted therapy has become a novel area for the study of tumor therapy. EGFR is expressed in 88–100% of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas, and is important in tumor cell growth, repair and survival. Furthermore, its overexpression often indicates a poor prognosis, early metastasis, chemotherapy resistance or a shorter survival (1214). Therefore, EGFR has become a key target for cancer gene therapy. In the present study, EGFR was highly expressed in NPC. EGFR-positive expression was observed in 86 out of 96 NPC patients and was found to be associated with aggressive clinical behavior, including advanced T clinical stages. Furthermore, EGFR expression was an independent prognostic factor for survival. A worse survival was observed in patients with positive EGFR expression when compared with patients with negative EGFR expression.

The p53 pathway is one of the most important pathways that regulates the cell cycle. p53 is activated in response to various internal and external stresses and results in an increase in the p21 transcription factor and its translational products. p21 induces G1 cell cycle arrest and DNA repair by inhibiting cyclin-dependent kinase 5 and increasing the expression of the growth arrest and DNA damage inducible genes. When DNA damage cannot be repaired, p53 induces apoptosis by increasing Bcl 2-associated protein X (BAX) expression and the formation of BAX homodimers. Mutations in the p53 gene are one of the most common genetic alterations found in human tumors. Approximately 50% of human tumors exhibit p53 mutations (1517). In the present study, p53-positive expression was identified in 65.6% of the NPC cases. Positive p53 expression was associated with poor clinical characteristics, including advanced T and clinical stages. Furthermore, p53 expression was an independent prognostic factor of survival. Patients with positive p53 expression exhibited a worse three-year survival rate than those with negative p53 expression.

MDM2 inactivates p53 via direct binding or its E3 ubiquitin ligase activity, which targets p53 for proteasomal degradation. Wild-type p53 is unstable, has a very short half-life and is rapidly degraded by the ubiquitin pathway, whereas mutated p53 is very stable and not easily degraded. In the present study, p53 expression was found to negatively correlate with MDM2 expression. Recent studies have reported that MDM2 expression in malignant tumors is associated with invasion, metastasis, poor prognosis and chemotherapy resistance (1821). In the present study, high MDM2 expression was identified in NPC (79.16%) and was found to significantly correlate with N stage. MDM2 expression levels were significantly higher in NPC patients with lymph node metastasis than in those without lymph node metastasis. However, MDM2 expression was not associated with T stage, clinical stage or survival in NPC.

eIF4E is a rate-limiting factor in protein synthesis and is distributed throughout the cytoplasm and nucleus in free-floating or multiprotein complex forms in almost all eukaryotic cells. eIF4E expression is regulated by c-myc, RAS and other oncogenes, and its overexpression selectively increases the mRNA translation of proteins associated with tumor growth and invasion, including fibroblast growth factor-2, transforming growth factor-β, platelet-derived growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). eIF4E overexpression is considered to be a valuable prognostic marker in various tumor types (22,23). In the present study, positive eIF4E expression was present in 74 out of 96 NPC cases (77.08%). However, eIF4E expression was not associated with T stage, clinical stage, lymph node metastasis or survival in NPC.

A complex association has been identified between p53, MDM2 and EGFR expression in a number of human tumors, whereby p53 protein expression was significantly lower and the EGFR and MDM2 expression were higher when compared with that of the normal tissues (24). However, the association between alterations in p53, MDM2, EGFR and the survival of patients with anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma remains controversial (25). In comparison with the initial tumor, recurrent lesions were characterized by a reduced expression of p53 and the number of MDM2 and EGFR positive specimens was reduced. Overexpression and deletion mutations of the EGFR gene, as well as MDM2 overexpression, have been linked to the absence of p53 gene mutations in human glioblastoma multiforme (26). High expression of VEGF and EGFR were independent adverse prognostic factors for long-term outcomes in nonmetastatic NPC independent of clinical stage (27). Mutations of p53 were associated with the overexpression of EGFR and absence of MDM2 in human esophageal carcinomas (28). In vivo studies have revealed that wild-type p53 activates the promoter of EGFR (28). Furthermore, clinical studies have demonstrated that the expression of p53, MDM2 and EGFR are prognostic of human cancers. Numerous studies have reported that the altered expression of these three genes were associated with poor survival and were prognostic of glioblastoma patients (3037). For example, Ruano et al (37) reported that poor outcome in primary glioblastoma multiforme patients is associated with concurrent EGFR and p53 alterations. Furthermore, p53, EGFR and MDM2 are also predictive markers in breast cancer (38), lung cancer (39), blastomatoid pulmonary carcinosarcoma (40), Wilms’ tumor (41), anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (42), bladder cancer (43) and prostate cancer (44). However, p53, MDM2, eIF4E and EGFR have not been previously associated with clinical characteristics in NPC. In this study, the expression of these proteins were detected and their correlation with clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis in NPC was investigated. The results indicated that p53 and EGFR expression correlate with T stage, whereas MDM2 expression correlates with lymph node metastasis. In addition, p53 and EGFR expression were identified as independent prognostic factors in NPC.

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Fundamental Applied Scheme of Sichuan Province Science and Technology Department (grant no. 2011JY0109).

Abbreviations:

CTV

clinical target volume

EGFR

epidermal growth factor receptor

eIF4E

eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E

GTV

gross target volume

MAPK

mitogen-activated protein kinase

MDM2

mouse double minute 2 homolog

NPC

nasopharyngeal carcinoma

PBS

phosphate-buffered saline

PI3K

phosphoinositide 3-kinase

VEGF

vascular endothelial growth factor

References

1 

Ho FC, Tham IW, Earnest A, et al: Patterns of regional lymph node metastasis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a meta-analysis of clinical evidence. BMC Cancer. 12:982012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Golubovskaya VM, Conway-Dorsey K, Edmiston SN, et al: FAK overexpression and p53 mutations are highly correlated in human breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 125:1735–1738. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Olivier M, Eeles R, Hollstein M, et al: The IARC TP53 database: new online mutation analysis and recommendations to users. Hum Mutat. 19:607–614. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Kondo I, Iida S, Takagi Y and Sugihara K: MDM2 mRNA expression in the p53 pathway may predict the potential of invasion and liver metastasis in colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 51:1395–1402. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Sunavala-Dossabhoy G, Palaniyandi S, Clark C, et al: Analysis of eIF4E and 4EBP1 mRNAs in head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope. 121:2136–2141. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Singh J, Jayaraj R, Baxi S, Mileva M, Curtin J and Thomas M: An Australian retrospective study to evaluate the prognostic role of p53 and eIF4E cancer markers in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC): study protocol. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 14:4717–4721. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Yin X, Kim RH, Sun G, Miller JK and Li BD: Overexpression of eukaryotic initiation factor 4E is correlated with increased risk for systemic dissemination in node-positive breast cancer patients. J Am Coll Surg. 218:663–671. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Von Pawel J: Gefitinib (Iressa, ZD1839): a novel targeted approach for the treatment of solid tumors. Bull Cancer. 91:E70–E76. 2004.PubMed/NCBI

9 

Feng M, Wang W, Fan Z, Fu B, Li J, Zhang S and Lang J: Tumor volume is an independent prognostic indicator of local control in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol. 8:2082013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Greene FL, Page DL, et al: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th edition. Springer; New York, NY: pp. 47–60. 2002

11 

Lee AW, Lin JC and Ng WT: Current management of nasopharyngeal cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol. 22:233–244. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Berg M and Soreide K: EGFR and downstream genetic alterations in KRAS/BRAF and PI3K/AKT pathways in colorectal cancer: implications for targeted therapy. Discov Med. 14:207–214. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

13 

Baselga J: The EGFR as a target for anticancer therapy - focus on cetuximab. Eur J Cancer. 37:S16–S22. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Nicholson RI, Gee JM and Harper ME: EGFR and cancer prognosis. Eur J Cancer. 37(Suppl 4): S9–S15. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Meek DW: Tumour suppression by p53: a role for the DNA damage response? Nat Rev Cancer. 9:714–723. 2009.PubMed/NCBI

16 

Chang LJ and Eastman A: Decreased translation of p21 (waf1) mRNA causes attenuated p53 signaling in some p53 wild-type tumors. Cell Cycle. 11:1818–1826. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Seong HA and Ha H: Murine protein serine/threonine kinase 38 activates p53 function through Ser15 phosphorylation. J Biol Chem. 287:20797–20810. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Yin Y, Stephen CW, Luciani MG, et al: p53 stability and activity is regulated by mdm2-mediated induction of alternative p53 translation products. Nat Cell Biol. 46:462–467. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Camus S, Ménendez S, Fernandes K, et al: The p53 isoforms are differentially modified by Mdm2. Cell Cycle. 11:1646–1655. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Huang L, Yan Z, Liao X, et al: The p53 inhibitors MDM2/MDMX complex is required for control of p53 activity in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 108:12001–12006. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Nicholson J and Hupp TR: The molecular dynamics of MDM2. Cell Cycle. 9:1878–1881. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

De Benedetti A and Graff JR: eIF-4E expression and its role in malignancies and metastases. Oncogene. 23:3189–3199. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Zimmer SG, DeBenedetti A and Graff JR: Translational control of malignancy: the mRNA cap-binding protein, eIF-4E, as a central regulator of tumor formation, growth, invasion and metastasis. Anticancer Res. 20:1343–1351. 2000.PubMed/NCBI

24 

Stark AM, Hugo HH, Witzel P, et al: Age-related expression of p53, Mdm2, EGFR and Msh2 in glioblastoma multiforme. Zentralbl Neurochir. 64:30–36. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Ushio Y, Tada K, Shiraishi S, et al: Correlation of molecular genetic analysis of p53, MDM2, p16, PTEN, and EGFR and survival of patients with anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma. Front Biosci. 1:281–288. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Halatsch ME, Schmidt U, Unterberg A and Vougioukas VI: Uniform MDM2 overexpression in a panel of glioblastoma multiforme cell lines with divergent EGFR and p53 expression status. Anticancer Res. 26:4191–4194. 2006.

27 

Pan J, Tang T, Xu L, et al: Prognostic significance of expression of cyclooxygenase-2, vascular endothelial growth factor, and epidermal growth factor receptor in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Head Neck. 35:1238–1247. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Esteve A, Lehman T, Jiang W, et al: Correlation of p53 mutations with epidermal growth factor receptor overexpression and absence of mdm2 amplification in human esophageal carcinomas. Mol Carcinog. 8:306–311. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Deb SP, Muñoz RM, Brown DR, et al: Wild-type human p53 activates the human epidermal growth factor receptor promoter. Oncogene. 9:1341–1349. 1994.PubMed/NCBI

30 

Korkolopoulou P, Christodoulou P, Kouzelis K, et al: MDM2 and p53 expression in gliomas: a multivariate survival analysis including proliferation markers and epidermal growth factor receptor. Br J Cancer. 75:1269–1278. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Harada K, Kurisu K, Tahara H, et al: Telomerase activity in primary and secondary glioblastomas multiforme as a novel molecular tumor marker. J Neurosurg. 93:618–625. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Halatsch ME, Schmidt U, Botefur IC, et al: Overexpression of deletion-mutant epidermal growth factor receptor is associated with altered genotoxic stress-provoked p53 mRNA induction in a human glioblastoma cell line. Anticancer Res. 21:189–195. 2001.PubMed/NCBI

33 

Kleihues P and Ohgaki H: Primary and secondary glioblastomas: from concept to clinical diagnosis. Neuro Oncol. 1:44–51. 1999.

34 

Stark AM, Hugo HH, Witzel P, et al: Age-related expression of p53, Mdm2, EGFR and Msh2 in glioblastoma multiforme. Zentralbl Neurochir. 64:30–36. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Houillier C, Lejeune J, Benouaich-Amiel A, et al: Prognostic impact of molecular markers in a series of 220 primary glioblastomas. Cancer. 106:2218–2223. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Dehais C, Laigle-Donadey F, Marie Y, et al: Prognostic stratification of patients with anaplastic gliomas according to genetic profile. Cancer. 107:1891–1897. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Ruano Y, Ribalta T, de Lope AR, et al: Worse outcome in primary glioblastoma multiforme with concurrent epidermal growth factor receptor and p53 alteration. Am J Clin Path. 131:257–263. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Ruiz C, Seibt S, Al Kuraya K, et al: Tissue microarrays for comparing molecular features with proliferation activity in breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 118:2190–2194. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar

39 

Berghmans T, Mascaux C, Haller A, et al: EGFR, TTF-1 and Mdm2 expression in stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a positive association. Lung Cancer. 62:35–44. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Schaefer IM, Sahlmann CO, Overbeck T, et al: Blastomatoid pulmonary carcinosarcoma: report of a case with a review of the literature. BMC Cancer. 12:4242012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Vasei M, Modjtahedi H, Ale-Booyeh O, et al: Amplification and expression of EGFR and ERBB2 in Wilms tumor. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 194:88–95. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Wiseman SM, Masoudi H, Niblock P, et al: Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: expression profile of targets for therapy offers new insights for disease treatment. Ann Surg Oncol. 14:719–729. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

43 

Baffa R, Letko J, McClung C, LeNoir J, Vecchione A and Gomella LG: Molecular genetics of bladder cancer: targets for diagnosis and therapy. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 25:145–160. 2006.PubMed/NCBI

44 

Bianco R, Caputo R, Caputo R, Damiano V, De Placido S, Ficorella C, et al: Combined targeting of epidermal growth factor receptor and MDM2 by gefitinib and antisense MDM2 cooperatively inhibit hormone-independent prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 10:4858–4864. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

January-2015
Volume 9 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Zhang P, Wu SK, Wang Y, Fan ZX, Li CR, Feng M, Xu P, Wang WD and Lang JY: p53, MDM2, eIF4E and EGFR expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma and their correlation with clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis: A retrospective study. Oncol Lett 9: 113-118, 2015
APA
Zhang, P., Wu, S., Wang, Y., Fan, Z., Li, C., Feng, M. ... Lang, J. (2015). p53, MDM2, eIF4E and EGFR expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma and their correlation with clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis: A retrospective study. Oncology Letters, 9, 113-118. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2014.2631
MLA
Zhang, P., Wu, S., Wang, Y., Fan, Z., Li, C., Feng, M., Xu, P., Wang, W., Lang, J."p53, MDM2, eIF4E and EGFR expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma and their correlation with clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis: A retrospective study". Oncology Letters 9.1 (2015): 113-118.
Chicago
Zhang, P., Wu, S., Wang, Y., Fan, Z., Li, C., Feng, M., Xu, P., Wang, W., Lang, J."p53, MDM2, eIF4E and EGFR expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma and their correlation with clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis: A retrospective study". Oncology Letters 9, no. 1 (2015): 113-118. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2014.2631