EGFR methylation and outcome of patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab

Chiadini,Elisa; Scarpi,Emanuela; Passardi,Alessandro; Calistri,Daniele; Valgiusti,Martina; Saragoni,Luca; Zoli,Wainer; Amadori,Dino; Ulivi,Paola

doi:10.3892/ol.2015.2876

EGFR methylation and outcome of patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab

Authors:
- Elisa Chiadini
- Emanuela Scarpi
- Alessandro Passardi
- Daniele Calistri
- Martina Valgiusti
- Luca Saragoni
- Wainer Zoli
- Dino Amadori
- Paola Ulivi
View Affiliations

Affiliations: Biosciences Laboratory, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy, Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy, Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy, Pathology Unit, Morgagni‑Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
Published online on: January 14, 2015 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.2876
Pages: 1432-1438

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

Abstract

Targeted therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with monoclonal antibody anti‑epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) agents, such as cetuximab (CTX) or panitumumab, is the treatment strategy of choice in patients characterised by a wild-type (wt) RAS gene status. However, despite selection based on RAS status, a high proportion of patients do not respond to therapy. EGFR methylation has been reported to have a role in predicting the response to anti‑EGFR agents. The present study aimed to evaluate the role of EGFR methylation in association with the clinical outcome of patients with mCRC treated with CTX. In total, 64 patients with mCRC were assessed in the present study. Genomic DNA was extracted from tumoral tissue and EGFR methylation and mutation of the KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA genes were analysed by pyrosequencing. EGFR expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. The various alterations were analysed by assessing the objective response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates. In total, 42 cases (66%) exhibited >10% EGFR methylation and there was no correlation with EGFR expression. Mean EGFR methylation of 41 and 9% was observed in KRAS-mutated and -wt patients, respectively (P=0.05). Conversely, a high EGFR methylation was observed in BRAF-wt patients with compared with patients possessing the mutated gene (18 vs. 3%, respectively; P=0.07). EGFR methylation was significantly correlated with the OS rate [hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.96‑1.00; P=0.019], but not PFS rate. In patients with a methylation rate <10 and >10%, the median OS rate was 7.5 months (95% CI, 4.4‑9.4 months) and 12.0 months (95% CI, 8.7‑13.9 months), respectively (P=0.034). In conclusion, the present study revealed a correlation between EGFR methylation and improved OS rate in patients treated with CTX‑based chemotherapy. The presence of EGFR methylation is inversely correlated with BRAF and PIK3CA mutations, indicating that the prognostic value of gene methylation may be worth verifying in further studies.

View Figures

View References

1	Lièvre A, Bachet JB, Le Corre D, et al: KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 66:3992–3995. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
2	Benvenuti S, Sartore-Bianchi A, Di Nicolantonio F, et al: Oncogenic activation of the RAS/RAF signaling pathway impairs the response of metastatic colorectal cancers to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody therapies. Cancer Res. 67:2643–2648. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
3	Amado RG, Wolf M, Peeters M, et al: Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 26:1626–1634. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
4	Sartore-Bianchi A, Di Nicolantonio F, Nichelatti M, et al: Multi-determinants analysis of molecular alterations for predicting clinical benefit to EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibodies in colorectal cancer. PLoS One. 4:e72872009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
5	Di Nicolantonio F, Martini M, Molinari F, et al: Wild-type BRAF is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 26:5705–5712. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
6	Frattini M, Saletti P, Romagnani E, et al: PTEN loss of expression predicts cetuximab efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 97:1139–1145. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
7	Perrone F, Lampis A, Orsenigo M, et al: PI3KCA/PTEN deregulation contributes to impaired responses to cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 20:84–90. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar
8	Sartore-Bianchi A, Martini M, Molinari F, et al: PIK3CA mutations in colorectal cancer are associated with clinical resistance to EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibodies. Cancer Res. 69:1851–1857. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
9	Jhawer M, Goel S, Wilson AJ, et al: PIK3CA mutation/PTEN expression status predicts response of colon cancer cells to the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor cetuximab. Cancer Res. 68:1953–1961. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
10	Laurent-Puig P, Cayre A, Manceau G, et al: Analysis of PTEN, BRAF, and EGFR status in determining benefit from cetuximab therapy in wild-type KRAS metastatic colon cancer. J Clin Oncol. 27:5924–5930. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
11	Razis E, Briasoulis E, Vrettou E, et al: Potential value of PTEN in predicting cetuximab response in colorectal cancer: An exploratory study. BMC Cancer. 8:2342008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
12	Ulivi P, Capelli L, Valgiusti M, et al: Predictive role of multiple gene alterations in response to cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: A single center study. J Transl Med. 10:872012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
13	Van Cutsem E, Köhne CH, Láng I, et al: Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: Updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status. J Clin Oncol. 29:2011–2019. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
14	Ogino S, Nosho K, Kirkner GJ, et al: CpG island methylator phenotype, microsatellite instability, BRAF mutation and clinical outcome in colon cancer. Gut. 58:90–96. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar :
15	Tol J, Nagtegaal ID and Punt CJ: BRAF mutation in metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 361:98–99. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
16	Ogino S, Nosho K, Kirkner GJ, et al: PIK3CA mutation is associated with poor prognosis among patients with curatively resected colon cancer. J Clin Oncol. 27:1477–1484. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
17	Douillard JY, Oliner KS, Siena S, Tabernero J, et al: Panitumumab-FOLFOX4 treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 369:1023–1034. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
18	Valentini AM, Pirrelli M and Caruso ML: EGFR-targeted therapy in colorectal cancer: Does immunohistochemistry deserve a role in predicting the response to cetuximab? Curr Opin Mol Ther. 10:124–131. 2008.PubMed/NCBI
19	Scartozzi M, Bearzi I, Mandolesi A, et al: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene promoter methylation and cetuximab treatment in colorectal cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 104:1786–1790. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
20	Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al: New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 92:205–216. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
21	National Cancer Institute. Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 3.0. http://ctep.cancer.gov. Accessed December 17, 2013
22	De Roock W, Claes B, Bernasconi D, et al: Effects of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: A retrospective consortium analysis. Lancet Oncol. 11:753–762. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
23	Cunningham D, Humblet Y, Siena S, et al: Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 351:337–345. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
24	Scartozzi M, Bearzi I, Mandolesi A, et al: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene copy number (GCN) correlates with clinical activity of irinotecan-cetuximab in K-RAS wild-type colorectal cancer: A fluorescence in situ (FISH) and chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) analysis. BMC Cancer. 9:3032009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
25	Licitra L, Störkel S, Kerr KM, et al: Predictive value of epidermal growth factor receptor expression for first-line chemotherapy plus cetuximab in patients with head and neck and colorectal cancer: Analysis of data from the EXTREME and CRYSTAL studies. Eur J Cancer. 49:1161–1168. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar
26	Atkins D, Reiffen KA, Tegtmeier CL, Winther H, Bonato MS and Störkel S: Immunohistochemical detection of EGFR in paraffin-embedded tumor tissues: Variation in staining intensity due to choice of fixative and storage time of tissue sections. J Histochem Cytochem. 52:893–901. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
27	Montero AJ, Díaz-Montero CM, Mao L, Youssef EM, Estecio M, Shen L and Issa JP: Epigenetic inactivation of EGFR by CpG island hypermethylation in cancer. Cancer Biol Ther. 5:1494–1501. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar