Regulation and clinical significance of the hypoxia-induced expression of ANGPTL4 in gastric cancer

  • Authors:
    • Hiroshi Kubo
    • Yoshihiko Kitajima
    • Keita Kai
    • Jun Nakamura
    • Shuusuke Miyake
    • Kazuyoshi Yanagihara
    • Kiyoto Morito
    • Tomokazu Tanaka
    • Masaaki Shida
    • Hirokazu Noshiro
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: December 8, 2015     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.4011
  • Pages: 1026-1034
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Solid tumors are often exposed to hypoxia. Hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)-1α upregulates numerous target genes associated with the malignant behavior of hypoxic cancer cells. A member of the angiopoietin family, angiopoietin-like protein 4 (ANGPTL4) is a hypoxia-inducible gene. The present study aimed to clarify whether ANGPTL4 is regulated by HIF‑1α in gastric cancer cells. The study also assessed whether ANGPTL4 expression is associated with clinicopathological factors or HIF‑1α expression in gastric cancer tissues. Hypoxia‑induced ANGPTL4 expression was quantitatively analyzed using reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT‑qPCR) in 10 gastric cancer cell lines. RT‑qPCR was further employed to investigate the HIF‑1α dependency of ANGPTL4 expression using HIF‑1α‑knockdown transfectant 58As9‑KD and control 58As9‑SC gastric cancer cells. The HIF‑1α and ANGPTL4 expression levels were immunohistochemically analyzed in 170 gastric cancer tissue specimens and were assessed for any correlations with the clinicopathological factors and/or patient survival. Subsequently, hypoxia‑induced ANGPTL4 expression was observed in 7 out of 10 gastric cancer cell lines. The hypoxic induction of ANGPTL4 was almost preserved in the 58As9‑KD cells compared with that observed in the 58As9‑SC cells, while the induction of known HIF‑1α target gene, carbonic anhydrase 9, was completely suppressed in the 58As9‑KD cells. In the gastric cancer tissues, ANGPTL4 expression was inversely correlated with the tumor depth, whereas HIF‑1α expression was positively correlated with venous invasion. A survival analysis revealed that the expression of ANGPTL4 was significantly correlated with a longer survival time, whereas that of HIF‑1α was correlated with a shorter survival time. In conclusion, the present findings indicate that hypoxia‑induced ANGPTL4 expression is independent of HIF‑1α in hypoxic gastric cancer cells. ANGPTL4 may be a favorable marker for predicting a long survival time, whereas HIF‑1α predicts a poor prognosis, in gastric cancer patients. The hypoxic environment independently induces ANGPTL4 and HIF-1α, which are believed to exhibit adverse effects on tumor progression.
View Figures
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

February-2016
Volume 11 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Kubo H, Kitajima Y, Kai K, Nakamura J, Miyake S, Yanagihara K, Morito K, Tanaka T, Shida M, Noshiro H, Noshiro H, et al: Regulation and clinical significance of the hypoxia-induced expression of ANGPTL4 in gastric cancer. Oncol Lett 11: 1026-1034, 2016
APA
Kubo, H., Kitajima, Y., Kai, K., Nakamura, J., Miyake, S., Yanagihara, K. ... Noshiro, H. (2016). Regulation and clinical significance of the hypoxia-induced expression of ANGPTL4 in gastric cancer. Oncology Letters, 11, 1026-1034. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.4011
MLA
Kubo, H., Kitajima, Y., Kai, K., Nakamura, J., Miyake, S., Yanagihara, K., Morito, K., Tanaka, T., Shida, M., Noshiro, H."Regulation and clinical significance of the hypoxia-induced expression of ANGPTL4 in gastric cancer". Oncology Letters 11.2 (2016): 1026-1034.
Chicago
Kubo, H., Kitajima, Y., Kai, K., Nakamura, J., Miyake, S., Yanagihara, K., Morito, K., Tanaka, T., Shida, M., Noshiro, H."Regulation and clinical significance of the hypoxia-induced expression of ANGPTL4 in gastric cancer". Oncology Letters 11, no. 2 (2016): 1026-1034. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.4011