High levels of class III β-tubulin expression are associated with aggressive tumor features in breast cancer
- Authors:
- Published online on: February 9, 2016 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2016.4206
- Pages: 1987-1994
-
Copyright: © Lebok et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-associated mortality in females worldwide, and >1.5 million females are diagnosed with breast cancer annually (1). Although the majority of breast cancer cases are detected at early stages due to regular screening, gaining an increased understanding of the molecular biology underlying breast cancer may aid further improvements to breast cancer diagnosis and therapy (1).
Microtubules are fibrous cytoskeletal proteins composed of polymers of α- and β-tubulin heterodimers. α- and β-tubulins exist as multiple isotypes, and the individual composition of microtubule fibers varies in specific tissues and among intracellular functions (2). In various compositions, microtubules contribute to a number of cellular mechanisms, including maintenance of cell shape, intracellular transport and chromosome segregation during mitosis and meiosis (2). Class III β-tubulin (βIII-tubulin, TUBB3) is a β-tubulin isotype that has been suggested to possess a significant role in malignant transformation and cancer development (3). TUBB3 expression is typically identified in cells of neuronal origin, where it contributes to the formation of dynamic microtubules, which are essential for neurite formation and maintenance (3). In addition, low levels of TUBB3 expression have been identified in several extra-neuronal normal tissues, including the testis, small intestine and placenta (4). Consequently, although TUBB3 overexpression is frequently observed in brain cancer, variable levels of expression have also been reported in other types of solid tumor, including cancer of the lungs, colon, ovary, kidney, prostate and larynx (4,5). High levels of TUBB3 expression have additionally been linked to poor clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung, gastric, breast and ovarian cancer (6–8), and to a reduced response to taxane-based microtubule-targeting anticancer drugs in these cancer types (7,9–11).
Additionally, in breast cancer, several clinical studies have suggested that sensitivity to chemotherapeutic taxane drugs was significantly decreased in breast cancer cases exhibiting increased levels of TUBB3 expression, alone or in combination with other molecular markers (10,12–15). Discrepancies have been reported with respect to associations between TUBB3 expression and breast cancer phenotype. For example, certain studies identified an association between high TUBB3 expression levels and high tumor grade (15,16), advanced tumor stage (16), negative hormone receptor state (16), human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) positivity (16,17) and a triple-negative phenotype (17), while alternative studies were unable to confirm these results (10,13,15,17). Similarly, two studies reported an association between TUBB3 overexpression and reduced overall survival rates (16,18), which was not identified in a previous study (12). As these previous studies had analyzed 84–314 cases/study, the present study hypothesized that the analysis of a larger patient cohort may aid the development of an improved understanding of the prognostic value of TUBB3 expression in breast cancer. The present study thus analyzed a large breast cancer prognosis tissue microarray (TMA), containing 2,197 consecutive breast cancer cases, including all histological subtypes and associated molecular data for TUBB3 expression.
Materials and methods
Breast cancer TMA
The breast cancer TMA utilized in the present study has been previously described in detail (19). Briefly, 2,197 formalin-fixed (buffered neutral aqueous 4% solution), paraffin-embedded tumors were assembled in a TMA format. A custom-made semiautomatic robotic precision instrument was used to punch out one tissue cylinder (diameter, 0.6 mm) for each case, from representative tumor areas of each patient tissue block. The histological grade of each sample was determined according to a modified scoring system devised by Elston and Ellis [Bloom-Richardson-Elston (BRE) score] (20). Several examples of molecular data utilized for the present study were available from previous studies, including data obtained via immunohistochemistry (IHC) for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and Ki67 (19,21) expression, as well as amplification data obtained via fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for HER2. The use of these tissues for FISH and protein expression analysis was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Hamburg (Hamburg, Germany). The median patient age was 62 years (range, 26–101 years) and median follow-up time was 68 months (range, 1–176 months). Clinicopathological parameters of the assayed cancer specimens are described in Table I.
 | Table I.Composition of breast cancer prognosis TMA and associations between tumor phenotype and TUBB3 immunohistochemistry. |
IHC
Freshly cut TMA sections were subjected to immunohistochemical analysis. Primary rabbit monoclonal antibody specific for TUBB3 (dilution, 1:150; cat no. ab68193; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) was added to the sections, slides were deparaffinized and subsequently exposed to heat-induced antigen retrieval for 5 min in an autoclave (Systec 2540 EL; Systec GmbH, Linden, Germany) at 121°C in pH 7.8 Tris-EDTA-citrate buffer (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Following incubation (at 37°C for 60 min), bound antibody was visualized using the EnVision™ kit (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). Internal staining in nerves and axons on the TMA slide served as a positive control, as previously described (22). The staining intensity and the percentage of positively stained tumor cells were recorded for each tissue spot. Staining intensity was determined by visual inspection of each TMA spot under a microscope (magnification, ×200; Axioskop 40; Carl Zeiss, Inc., Oberkochen, Germany). Staining intensity scores were assigned as follows: No visible staining, 0; faint staining, 1+; medium staining, +2; and strong staining, 3+. In addition, the fraction of positively stained cells (5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 or 100%) was estimated in each spot by visual inspection. A final score was calculated from these two parameters according to the following criteria, as previously described (23): Negative score, staining intensity of 0; weak score, staining intensity of 1+ in ≤70% of tumor cells, or 2+ in ≤30% of tumor cells; moderate score, staining intensity of 1+ in >70% of tumor cells, 2+ in 31–70% of tumor cells, or 3+ in ≤30% of tumor cells; and high score, staining intensity of 2+ in >70% of tumor cells, or 3+ in >30% of tumor cells (Fig. 1).
Statistical analysis
Statistical calculations were performed using JMP 9 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Contingency tables and χ2 test were performed to identify associations between tumor phenotype and molecular parameters. Survival curves were calculated according to Kaplan-Meier. The Log-Rank test was applied to identify any significant survival differences between groups. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to investigate statistical independence and significance between pathological, molecular and clinical features. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Technical issues with interpretation of the TMA
A total of 1,652 (75.2%) tumor samples were interpretable in the TMA analysis. Reasons for non-interpretable cases (545 spots; 24.8%) included a lack of tissue samples or an absence of unequivocal cancer tissue in the TMA spot.
Enhanced TUBB3 expression is significantly associated with high-grade breast cancer cases, ER-and PR-negative tumors and the presence of HER2 amplification
TUBB3 immunostaining was localized to the cytoplasm of the cells. Representative images of positive and negative TUBB3 immunostaining are exhibited in Fig. 1. In total, positive immunostaining was detected in 55.7% of the 1,652 interpretable breast cancer cases, including 1.9% of tumors exhibiting weak, 14.5% exhibiting moderate and 39.3% exhibiting high levels of immunostaining, according to the aforementioned predefined criteria (23). TUBB3 expression was significantly less frequent in lobular breast cancer cases (34%) when compared with other types of breast cancer, including the largest group of breast cancer cases of no special type (60%; P<0.0001). Increased levels of TUBB3 expression were significantly associated with high-grade breast cancer cases (P<0.0001), ER-negative (P<0.0001) and PR-negative (P=0.0039) tumors and the presence of HER2 amplification (P<0.0001), although were not associated with tumor stage (P=0.5921) or presence of nodal metastasis (P=0.1549). All results are summarized in Table I. For all subsequent analyses, the small fraction of breast cancer cases that exhibited weak expression (n=31; 1.9%) was combined with the subset of breast cancer cases that exhibited moderate expression (n=239; 14.5%), into a single ‘low expression’ group.
TUBB3 expression is associated with patient survival
Follow-up data were available for 1,650 breast cancer cases with interpretable TUBB3 results, including 1,209 cases of no special type. If all breast cancer cases were jointly analyzed, a statistically significant association existed between low and high TUBB3 expression and shortened raw survival (P=0.0088; Fig. 2A), which was less marked (statistically insignificant) when the analysis was restricted to the subset of breast cancers of no special type (P=0.1583; Fig. 2B). For all breast cancer cases, this association was not observed following multivariate analysis including the established prognosticators of tumor stage stage (P=0.0039), BRE grade (P<0.0001) and nodal stage (P<0.0001), in addition to the TUBB3 immunostaining results (P=0.0806; Table II).
| Table II.Multivariate analysis of overall survival, including tumor stage, BRE grade, nodal stage and TUBB3 expression. |
TUBB3 expression is significantly associated with triple negative breast cancer
ER, PR and HER2 data were combined to identify a triple-negative phenotype in 177 (12.7%) cases, an ER- and/or PR-positive phenotype in 973 (69.7%) cases and a HER2-positive (presence of HER2 amplification) phenotype in 246 cases (17.6%) of 1,396 breast cancer cases with interpretable data for TUBB3 expression. TUBB3 expression was significantly associated with subsets of breast cancer exhibiting HER2 amplification or a triple-negative phenotype: 70% each of triple-negative tumors and HER2-amplified breast cancer cases were classified as TUBB3-positive, compared with only 51% of ER/PR-positive specimens (Fig. 3).
High TUBB3 expression is associated with cell proliferation
Immunohistochemical data regarding Ki67 expression were available for 1,276 breast cancer cases possessing interpretable TUBB3 results. A high proliferation index (Ki67 labeling index; i.e., the % of Ki67-positive cancer cells per high power field) was associated with high TUBB3 immunostaining if all types of breast cancer were jointly analyzed (P<0.0001); however, subset analysis revealed that this association was primarily driven by BRE grade, as there was no statistically significant increase in cell proliferation rates within the subgroups of breast cancer cases of identical BRE grade (Fig. 4).
Discussion
The results of the present study demonstrated that TUBB3 is frequently expressed in breast cancer cases, and is associated with adverse prognostic features, including a triple-negative hormone receptor status and the presence of HER2 amplification.
Positive TUBB3 staining was detected in 55.7% of the 1,652 breast cancer samples that were successfully analyzed in the present study. A total of 40% of cancer cases evaluated exhibited high immunostaining according to the predefined criteria. These data were concurrent with the results of earlier IHC studies investigating TUBB3 expression, which had analyzed between 46 and 1,205 cases of breast cancer (10,13,15,16,18). Despite variable thresholds for TUBB3 expression levels, these previous studies reported TUBB3 positivity in 34–62% of samples. In the present study, utilization of a TMA enabled the analysis of a markedly larger cohort of cancer cases, enabling evaluation of the potential biological and clinical roles of TUBB3 expression. Although the analysis was limited to a single tumor specimen of 0.6 mm in diameter per patient, the breast cancer prognosis TMA utilized in the present study has previously been proven to be effective in identifying associations between biomarkers and clinicopathological parameters of breast cancer (19,21,24–26).
A comparison of immunostaining results with the phenotype of the assayed types of cancer revealed that increased TUBB3 expression levels were associated with certain features of aggressive breast cancer, including advanced tumor grade, loss of ER/PR expression, HER2 amplification and triple-negative phenotypes; however, TUBB3 expression levels exhibited no significant associations with tumor stage and metastatic growth. These results appear to disprove a major role for TUBB3 in tumor progression or metastasis. The results of the present study are supported by those of previous studies, which reported increased levels of TUBB3 expression in grade 3 tumors, compared with those of grade 1 and 2 tumors (15,16), in hormone receptor-negative cancer compared with hormone receptor-positive cancer (16), in HER2 amplified cancer (16,17) and in triple-negative cancer (17). The fact that none of these previous studies identified all of these associations is potentially due to the comparatively small sample sets used, ranging between 84 and 314 tumors. The fact that all associations were able to be clearly visualized in the present study, which analyzed >1,600 breast cancer cases, emphasizes the importance of analyzing as large as possible a tumor set for candidate biomarker validation.
Notably, the subtype of lobular cancer demonstrated significantly lower TUBB3 expression compared with that of other breast cancer types. Given that loss of E-cadherin function is the primary characteristic feature of lobular breast cancer (27), it is possible that TUBB3 expression does not provide a selective advantage in an E-cadherin-negative molecular background, or that E-cadherin signaling may be involved in regulating TUBB3 expression. E-cadherin maintains epithelial integrity by binding to the cytoplasmic α- and β-catenin proteins, which link cadherin to the actin cytoskeleton (28). Loss of E-cadherin induces epithelial mesenchymal transition, a significant event in the development of cancer (27). It may be hypothesized that loss of E-cadherin function in lobular breast cancer cases results in such marked changes to the cytoskeleton, that the increase in microtubule dynamics induced by TUBB3 overexpression may exert little or no additional effects. However, a recent study identified that drug-induced microtubule disassembly in vitro resulted in aberrant expression of E-cadherin (29), supporting a direct molecular link between tubulin turnover and E-cadherin expression. To the best of our knowledge, only one study, including 44 breast cancer cases of no special type and 40 lobular breast cancer cases (13), had previously investigated the variations in TUBB3 expression between these histological subtypes, however this study identified no significant differences, in contrast to the results of the present study.
In the present study, TUBB3 expression was significantly associated with shortened survival when all 1,649 cancer cases were jointly analyzed. In a multivariate analysis including established prognosticators, the hazard ratio for overall survival was increased by expression of TUBB3, however, this was not dependent on the expression level in multivariate analysis. These results suggest that TUBB3 may not be an optimal prognostic marker for routine application in breast cancer diagnosis. This may be explained by the fact that TUBB3 overexpression was linked to certain adverse prognostic features, including HER2 amplification and a triple-negative phenotype, however not to other significant prognostic factors, including tumor stage and metastatic growth. For example, the fraction of TUBB3-positive cases was identical in early (pT1) and late (pT4) stage cancer, or in nodal-negative (pN0) and nodal-positive (pN+) tumors, and was not unequivocally linked to tumor cell proliferation in the present study. The results of the present study support those of a previous study, which reported that TUBB3 messenger RNA expression was associated with reduced survival, although the authors did not identify a significant association when TUBB3 expression was determined by TUBB3 IHC analysis (16). Furthermore, in concordance with the results of the present study, Horak et al (17) reported an association between TUBB3 overexpression and HER2-enriched and basal-like cancer types, as well as a triple-negative phenotype. Increased levels of TUBB3 have additionally been linked to adverse phenotypes and poor prognosis in various other types of solid cancer, including colon (3), prostate (5), lung (9,30), ovarian (31,32) and neurological cancer (33). The adverse effects of TUBB3 may be linked to its significant role in rendering microtubules dynamic. High microtubule plasticity is required for cellular processes that also have significant roles in cancer cells, including cell motility, mitotic spindle formation and cell division. Microtubules containing α/TUBB3-heterodimers are more dynamic than those assembled from other isotypes, for example α/β class II, which results in the generation of less flexible microtubules (34,35). It is thought that the TUBB3 isotype is responsible for generating the highly dynamic microtubules required for neurite formation and motility in neuronal tissues (33).
Several studies have suggested that TUBB3 may be a clinically relevant biomarker for the prediction of responses to drugs targeting microtubules, including vinca alkaloids, taxanes and epothilone analogues in breast (10,13–15), lung, ovarian, prostate, breast, stomach and pancreatic tumors (36). These drugs constitute a significant class of chemotherapeutic agent, which impair microtubule assembly and activity and inhibit cell division via inhibition of the mitotic spindle and induction of apoptosis, in solid tumors and hematological malignancies (37,38). It has thus been suggested that the increase in microtubule dynamics conferred by TUBB3 may provide resistance to microtubule-targeting drugs (39). However, the two largest studies of TUBB3 and breast cancer, including 314 specimens analyzed by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group and >1,200 specimens from the BCIRG001 trial, were unable to identify an association between TUBB3 expression levels and the benefit of inclusion of Paclitaxel into the treatment regimen (16,18). It is possible that the discrepant conclusions arising from the present and previous studies may be associated with the study size and/or composition of the cancer specimens, with respect to histological subtypes and alterations in clinically relevant molecular pathways, including ER or HER2 signaling. The results of the present study contribute to the ongoing discussion, indicating that it may be possible that lobular breast cancer, which demonstrated the lowest levels of TUBB3 expression amongst all histological subtypes included in the present study, may benefit more from tubulin-targeting agents, compared with alternative histological subtypes of cancer, provided that TUBB3 expression levels posses predictive value for responses to therapy.
In conclusion, the present study emphasized the significant role for TUBB3 in breast cancer, based on its association with prognostic adverse molecular subtypes, including HER2 positive and triple-negative tumors. In addition, the results of the present study demonstrated variations in TUBB3 expression levels between the two most frequent histological subtypes of breast cancer, lobular cancer and tumors of no special type. However, the comparatively low prognostic power of TUBB3 measurement by IHC appears to disprove a potential role for this factor as a clinically relevant prognostic biomarker in breast cancer.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Miss. Christina Koop, Miss. Janett Lütgens, Miss. Sünje Seekamp and Mrs. Inge Brandt from the tissue microarray facility at the Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg - Eppendorf (Hamburg, Germany) for technical support.
References
|
Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J and Jemal A: Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 65:87–108. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Orr GA, Verdier-Pinard P, McDaid H and Horwitz SB: Mechanisms of Taxol resistance related to microtubules. Oncogene. 22:7280–7295. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Katsetos CD, Herman MM and Mörk SJ: Class III beta-tubulin in human development and cancer. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 55:77–96. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Leandro-García LJ, Leskelä S, Landa I, Montero-Conde C, López-Jiménez E, Letón R, Cascón A, Robledo M and Rodríguez-Antona C: Tumoral and tissue-specific expression of the major human beta-tubulin isotypes. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken). 67:214–223. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Tsourlakis MC, Weigand P, Grupp K, Kluth M, Steurer S, Schlomm T, Graefen M, Huland H, Salomon G, Steuber T, et al: βIII-tubulin overexpression is an independent predictor of prostate cancer progression tightly linked to ERG fusion status and PTEN deletion. Am J Pathol. 184:609–617. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ferrandina G, Zannoni GF, Martinelli E, Paglia A, Gallotta V, Mozzetti S, Scambia G and Ferlini C: Class III beta-tubulin overexpression is a marker of poor clinical outcome in advanced ovarian cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 12:2774–2779. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Hetland TE, Hellesylt E, Flørenes VA, Tropé C, Davidson B and Kærn J: Class III β-tubulin expression in advanced-stage serous ovarian carcinoma effusions is associated with poor survival and primary chemoresistance. Hum Pathol. 42:1019–1026. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Koh Y, Jang B, Han SW, Kim TM, Oh DY, Lee SH, Kang CH, Kim DW, Im SA, Chung DH, et al: Expression of class III beta-tubulin correlates with unfavorable survival outcome in patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 5:320–325. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhang HL, Ruan L, Zheng LM, Whyte D, Tzeng CM and Zhou XW: Association between class III β-tubulin expression and response to paclitaxel/vinorebine-based chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis. Lung Cancer. 77:9–15. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chen X, Wu J, Lu H, Huang O and Shen K: Measuring β-tubulin III, Bcl-2, and ERCC1 improves pathological complete remission predictive accuracy in breast cancer. Cancer Sci. 103:262–268. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zheng WE, Chen H, Yuan SF, Wu LL, Zhang W, Sun HY and Chen WJ: Overexpression of βIII-tubulin and survivin associated with drug resistance to docetaxel-based chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. J BUON. 17:284–290. 2012.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Galmarini CM, Treilleux I, Cardoso F, Bernard-Marty C, Durbecq V, Gancberg D, Bissery MC, Paesmans M, Larsimont D, Piccart MJ, et al: Class III beta-tubulin isotype predicts response in advanced breast cancer patients randomly treated either with single-agent doxorubicin or docetaxel. Clin Cancer Res. 14:4511–4516. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yuan SF, Zhu LJ, Zheng WE, Chen H, Wu LL, Zhang W, Sun HY and Chen WJ: Expression of β-tubulin III and survivin in advance stage breast cancer correlates with chemotherapeutic effects of docetaxel. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 13:361–365. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Jung M, Koo JS, Moon YW, Park BW, Kim SI, Park S, Lee SH, Hong S, Rha SY, Chung HC, et al: Overexpression of class III beta tubulin and amplified HER2 gene predict good response to paclitaxel and trastuzumab therapy. PLoS One. 7:e451272012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang YI, Sparano JA, Fineberg S, Stead L, Sunkara J, Horwitz SB and McDaid HM: High expression of class III β-tubulin predicts good response to neoadjuvant taxane and doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 13:103–108. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Pentheroudakis G, Batistatou A, Kalogeras KT, Kronenwett R, Wirtz RM, Bournakis E, Eleftheraki AG, Pectasides D, Bobos M, Papaspirou I, et al: Prognostic utility of β-tubulin isotype III and correlations with other molecular and clinicopathological variables in patients with early breast cancer: A translational Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 127:179–193. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Horak CE, Pusztai L, Xing G, Trifan OC, Saura C, Tseng LM, Chan S, Welcher R and Liu D: Biomarker analysis of neoadjuvant doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by ixabepilone or Paclitaxel in early-stage breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 19:1587–1595. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Dumontet C, Krajewska M, Treilleux I, Mackey JR, Martin M, Rupin M, Lafanechère L and Reed JC: BCIRG 001 molecular analysis: Prognostic factors in node-positive breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 16:3988–3997. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ruiz C, Seibt S, Al Kuraya K, Siraj AK, Mirlacher M, Schraml P, Maurer R, Spichtin H, Torhorst J, Popovska S, et al: Tissue microarrays for comparing molecular features with proliferation activity in breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 118:2190–2194. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Elston CW and Ellis IO: Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: Experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology. 19:403–410. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Al-Kuraya K, Schraml P, Torhorst J, Tapia C, Zaharieva B, Novotny H, Spichtin H, Maurer R, Mirlacher M, Köchli O, et al: Prognostic relevance of gene amplifications and coamplifications in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 64:8534–8540. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ploussard G, Terry S, Maillé P, Allory Y, Sirab N, Kheuang L, Soyeux P, Nicolaiew N, Coppolani E, Paule B, et al: Class III beta-tubulin expression predicts prostate tumor aggressiveness and patient response to docetaxel-based chemotherapy. Cancer Res. 70:9253–9264. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Minner S, Wittmer C, Graefen M, Salomon G, Steuber T, Haese A, Huland H, Bokemeyer C, Yekebas E, Dierlamm J, et al: High level PSMA expression is associated with early PSA recurrence in surgically treated prostate cancer. Prostate. 71:281–288. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Choschzick M, Lebeau A, Marx AH, Tharun L, Terracciano L, Heilenkötter U, Jaenicke F, Bokemeyer C, Simon R, Sauter G and Schwarz J: Overexpression of cell division cycle 7 homolog is associated with gene amplification frequency in breast cancer. Hum Pathol. 41:358–365. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Choschzick M, Lassen P, Lebeau A, Marx AH, Terracciano L, Heilenkötter U, Jaenicke F, Bokemeyer C, Izbicki J, Sauter G and Simon R: Amplification of 8q21 in breast cancer is independent of MYC and associated with poor patient outcome. Mod Pathol. 23:603–610. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Burandt E, Jens G, Holst F, Jänicke F, Müller V, Quaas A, Choschzick M, Wilczak W, Terracciano L, Simon R, et al: Prognostic relevance of AIB1 (NCoA3) amplification and overexpression in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 137:745–753. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Stockinger A, Eger A, Wolf J, Beug H and Foisner R: E-cadherin regulates cell growth by modulating proliferation-dependent beta-catenin transcriptional activity. J Cell Biol. 154:1185–1196. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
van Roy F and Berx G: The cell-cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin. Cell Mol Life Sci. 65:3756–3788. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kitase Y and Shuler CF: Microtubule disassembly prevents palatal fusion and alters regulation of the E-cadherin/catenin complex. Int J Dev Biol. 57:55–60. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Levallet G, Bergot E, Antoine M, Creveuil C, Santos AO, Beau-Faller M, de Fraipont F, Brambilla E, Levallet J, Morin F, et al: High TUBB3 expression, an independent prognostic marker in patients with early non-small cell lung cancer treated by preoperative chemotherapy, is regulated by K-Ras signaling pathway. Mol Cancer Ther. 11:1203–1213. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Gao S, Zhao X, Lin B, Hu Z, Yan L and Gao J: Clinical implications of REST and TUBB3 in ovarian cancer and its relationship to paclitaxel resistance. Tumour Biol. 33:1759–1765. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Carrara L, Guzzo F, Roque DM, Bellone S, Emiliano C, Sartori E, Pecorelli S, Schwartz PE, Rutherford TJ and Santin AD: Differential in vitro sensitivity to patupilone versus paclitaxel in uterine and ovarian carcinosarcoma cell lines is linked to tubulin-beta-III expression. Gynecol Oncol. 125:231–236. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Katsetos CD, Legido A, Perentes E and Mörk SJ: Class III beta-tubulin isotype: A key cytoskeletal protein at the crossroads of developmental neurobiology and tumor neuropathology. J Child Neurol. 18:851–867. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Panda D, Miller HP, Banerjee A, Ludueña RF and Wilson L: Microtubule dynamics in vitro are regulated by the tubulin isotype composition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 91:11358–11362. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Falconer MM, Echeverri CJ and Brown DL: Differential sorting of beta tubulin isotypes into colchicine-stable microtubules during neuronal and muscle differentiation of embryonal carcinoma cells. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 21:313–325. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sève P and Dumontet C: Is class III beta-tubulin a predictive factor in patients receiving tubulin-binding agents? Lancet Oncol. 9:168–175. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Jordan MA, Toso RJ, Thrower D and Wilson L: Mechanism of mitotic block and inhibition of cell proliferation by taxol at low concentrations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 90:9552–9556. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Dumontet C and Sikic BI: Mechanisms of action of and resistance to antitubulin agents: Microtubule dynamics, drug transport, and cell death. J Clin Oncol. 17:1061–1070. 1999.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Narvi E, Jaakkola K, Winsel S, Oetken-Lindholm C, Halonen P, Kallio L and Kallio MJ: Altered TUBB3 expression contributes to the epothilone response of mitotic cells. Br J Cancer. 108:82–90. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |
