|
1
|
Morris EA, Comstock CE and Lee CH: ACR
BI-RADS®. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. In: ACR
BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data
System. American College of Radiology (Reston, VA). 1–173.
2013.
|
|
2
|
Trimboli RM, Verardi N, Cartia F,
Carbonaro LA and Sardanelli F: Breast cancer detection using double
reading of unenhanced MRI including T1-weighted, T2-weighted STIR
and diffusion-weighted imaging: A proof of concept study. AJR Am J
Roentgenol. 203:674–681. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3
|
Oseledchyk A, Kaiser C, Nemes L, Döbler M,
Abramian A, Keyver-Paik MD, Leutner C, Schild HH, Kuhn W and Debald
M: Preoperative MRI in patients with locoregional recurrent breast
cancer: Influence on treatment modalities. Acad Radiol.
21:1276–1285. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4
|
Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, Harms S,
Leach MO, Lehman CD, Morris E, Pisano E, Schnall M, Sener S, et al:
American cancer society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as
an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin. 57:75–89. 2007.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
An YY, Kim SH and Kang BJ: Characteristic
features and usefulness of MRI in breast cancer in patients under
40 years old: Correlations with conventional imaging and prognostic
factors. Breast Cancer. 21:302–315. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6
|
Lee SH, Cho N, Kim SJ, Cha JH, Cho KS, Ko
ES and Moon WK: Correlation between high resolution dynamic MR
features and prognostic factors in breast cancer. Korean J Radiol.
9:10–18. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
7
|
Szabó BK, Aspelin P, Kristoffersen Wiberg
M, Tot T and Boné B: Invasive breast cancer: Correlation of dynamic
MR features with prognostic factors. Eur Radiol. 13:2425–2435.
2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
8
|
Kim TH, Kang DK, Yim H, Jung YS, Kim KS
and Kang SY: Magnetic resonance imaging patterns of tumor
regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
patients: Correlation with histopathological response grading
system based on tumor cellularity. J Comput Assist Tomogr.
36:200–206. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
9
|
Elston CW and Ellis IO: Pathological
prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of
histopathological grade in breast cancer: Experience from a large
study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology. 19:403–410. 1991.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
10
|
Lamb PM, Perry NM, Vinnicombe SJ and Wells
CA: Correlation between ultrasound characteristics, mammographic
findings and histopathological grade in patients with invasive
ductal carcinoma of the breast. Clin Radiol. 55:40–44. 2000.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
11
|
Tozaki M, Igarashi T and Fukuda K:
Positive and negative predictive values of BI-RADS-MRI descriptors
for focal breast masses. Magn Reson Med Sci. 5:7–15. 2006.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
12
|
Schmitz AM, Loo CE, Wesseling J, Pijnappel
RM and Gilhuijs KG: Association between rim enhancement of breast
cancer on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and patient outcome: Impact
of subtype. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 148:541–551. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
13
|
Van Goethem M, Schelfout K, Dijckmans L,
Van Der Auwera JC, Weyler J, Verslegers I, Biltjes I and De
Schepper A: MR mammography in the pre-operative staging of breast
cancer in patients with dense breast tissue: Comparison with
mammography and ultrasound. Eur Radiol. 14:809–816. 2004.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
14
|
He D, Ma D and Jin E: Dynamic MRI-derived
parameters for hot and cold spots: Correlation with breast cancer
histopathology. J BUON. 17:57–64. 2012.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
15
|
Buadu LD, Murakami J, Murayama S,
Hashiguchi N, Sakai S, Masuda K, Toyoshima S, Kuroki S and Ohno S:
Breast lesions: Correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns
on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis.
Radiology. 200:639–649. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
16
|
Matsubayashi RN, Fujii T, Yasumori K,
Muranaka T and Momosaki S: Apparent diffusion coefficient in
invasive ductal breast carcinoma: Correlation with detailed
histologic features and the enhancement ratio on dynamic
contrast-enhanced MR images. J Oncol. 2010:pii: 821048. 2010.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
17
|
Su MY, Baik HM, Yu HJ, Chen JH, Mehta RS
and Nalcioglu O: Comparison of choline and pharmacokinetic
parameters in breast cancer measured by MR spectroscopic imaging
and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. Technol Cancer Res Treat.
5:401–410. 2006.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
Paradiso A, Mangia A, Barletta A, Marzullo
F, Ventrella V, Racanelli A, Schittulli F and De Lena M:
Mammography and morphobiologic characteristics of human breast
cancer. Tumori. 79:422–426. 1993.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19
|
Liu H and Peng W: MRI morphological
classification of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) correlating with
different biological behavior. Eur J Radiol. 81:214–217. 2012.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
20
|
World Medical Association: World Medical
Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical
research involving human subjects. JAMA. 310:2191–2194. 2013.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
21
|
Ellis IO, Schnitt SJ, Sastre-Garau X,
Bussolati G, Tavassoli FA, Eusebi V, Peterse JL, Mukai K, Tabár L,
Jacquemier J, et al: Tumors of the Breast. WHO Classification of
Tumours of the Breast. Lakhani SR, Ellis IO, Schnitt SJ, Tan PH and
van de Vijver MJ: 4:(4th). IARC Press. (Lyon, France). 34–38.
2012.
|
|
22
|
Matsubayashi R, Matsuo Y, Edakuni G, Satoh
T, Tokunaga O and Kudo S: Breast masses with peripheral rim
enhancement on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: Correlation of
MR findings with histologic features and expression of growth
factors. Radiology. 217:841–848. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
23
|
Buadu LD, Murakami J, Murayama S,
Hashiguchi N, Sakai S, Toyoshima S, Masuda K, Kuroki S and Ohno S:
Patterns of peripheral enhancement in breast masses: Correlation of
findings on contrast medium enhanced MRI with histologic features
and tumor angiogenesis. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 21:421–430. 1997.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
24
|
Partridge SC, Stone KM, Strigel RM,
DeMartini WB, Peacock S and Lehman CD: Breast DCE-MRI: Influence of
postcontrast timing on automated lesion kinetics assessments and
discrimination of benign and malignant lesions. Acad Radiol.
21:1195–1203. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
25
|
Kuhl CK, Schild HH and Morakkabati N:
Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast:
Trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution. Radiology.
236:789–800. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
26
|
Wang CH, Yin FF, Horton J and Chang Z:
Review of treatment assessment using DCE-MRI in breast cancer
radiation therapy. World J Methodol. 4:46–58. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
27
|
Mussurakis S, Gibbs P and Horsman A:
Peripheral enhancement and spatial contrast uptake heterogeneity of
primary breast tumours: Quantitative assessment with dynamic MRI. J
Comput Assist Tomogr. 22:35–46. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
