Protein expression of nucleophosmin, annexin A3 and nm23-H1 correlates with human nasopharyngeal carcinoma radioresistance in vivo

Introduction

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is an endemic disease in Southeast Asia and Southeast China. Radiotherapy is the primary treatment for patients with non-metastatic NPC, and concurrent chemoradiotherapy is considered the standard treatment for locally-advanced NPC (1,2). Due to radioresistance, certain patients with NPC present with local recurrences and distant metastases 1–2 years after treatment (3). The primary reason for the failure to respond to radiotherapy is radioresistance. Numerous studies have aimed to identify differentially-expressed proteins (DEPs) associated with cancer radioresistance between paired parental cell lines and radioresistant subclones using high-throughput proteomics methods. These studies focused either on paired parental and radioresistant cancer cells or immunochemical analyses of tissues from patients with locoregional failure. These methods have limitations in the screening for novel biomarkers that can be used for diagnosis and treatment. Nevertheless, there was no overlap in the proteins involved in radioresistance in the various studies. This may be due to distinct tissue specificity or the different methods used. Although several radioresistant subclones of NPC have been established (3,4), no animal experiments have been reported thus far. As described previously (3), we have also established a subclone (CNE-2R) by exposing CNE-2 cells to a cumulative radiation dose of 64 Gy. CNE-2R and CNE-2 cells have a different survival fraction at 2 Gy value, as well as varying α, β and α/β values, which were verified by colony formation assays and complementary (c)DNA microarray analyses (3). A study by Sekhar et al found that the inhibition of DNA repair due to the inhibition of nucleophosmin (NPM) shuttling increases the efficacy of DNA-damaging therapeutic strategies (5), thereby increasing radiosensitivity. In another study, annexin A3 was selected as a protein of interest in paired prostate cancer cell lines, and five regulated proteins (nucleoside diphosphate kinase A, heat shock 70-kDa protein 8, DNA-(apurinic or apyrimidinic site) lyase, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 RNA-binding protein and Ras-related protein Rab-11A) were validated using western blot analyses. However, annexin A3 was not validated (6). Nm23-H1 was first identified as a biological predictor of radioresistance based on cDNA array and proteomics analyses (7). However, it remains unclear as to whether it acts as a biomarker.

In the present study, changes in protein expression associated with radioresistance were investigated. First, possible DEPs for NPC radioresistance were identified by comparing CNE-2R cells and parental CNE-2 cells in vitro. Next, three particularly significant DEPs, NPM1, annexin A3 and nm23-H1, were validated using western blot assays (8). Comparable radioresistant and radiosensitive tumor models of NPC were established by subcutaneously injecting CNE-2R cells and CNE-2 cells into athymic nude mice. The xenografts were irradiated with fractioned X-ray irradiation and the growth characterization was studied. Finally, in order to validate the expression of these proteins in vivo, NPM1, annexin A3 and nm23-H1 protein expression was immunohistochemically examined in the tumor tissues. The findings indicated that NPM1, annexin A3 and nm23-H1 are potential biomarkers for predicting the response of NPC to radiotherapy.

Materials and methods

Cell lines and cell culture

Poorly-differentiated human NPC CNE-2 cells were purchased from the Cancer Hospital of Fudan University (Shangha, China). CNE-2R cells were induced by treating the parental CNE-2 cells with fractioned cobalt-60 γ-ray irradiation (total dose, 6,400 cGy; Theratron 780; Theratronics International Ltd., Kanata, Canada) (3). The CNE-2R and CNE-2 cells were cultured separately in RPMI 1640 medium (Hyclone; GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Logan UT, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hangzhou Sijiqing Biological Engineering Materials Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China), penicillin G (100 kU/l; (North China Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Shijiazhuang, China) and streptomycin (100 mg/l; Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Jinan, China). The cells were maintained at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator until use.

Xenograft tumorigenicity assays

BALB/c athymic nude mice (males and females, aged 4–6 weeks; n=36) were obtained from the Animal Laboratory Center of Guangxi Medical University [Guangxi, China; license number, SCXK (Gui) 2009-002]. The mice were housed five per cage, and maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions. The mice were randomly divided into three groups of 12 animals each: Group A, treated with CNE-2R cells; group B, treated with CNE-2 cells; and group C, treated with saline. In group A, CNE-2R cells (1×107 in a total volume of 0.2 ml) were subcutaneously injected into the right hind legs of 6 mice, and both the right and left hind legs of 6 mice. In group B, CNE-2 cells (1×107 in a total volume of 0.2 ml) were subcutaneously injected into the right hind legs of 6 mice, and both the right and left hind legs of 6 mice. The subcutaneous xenograft tumors were palpated and the diameters measured every other day using calipers. The volumes of the tumors were calculated using the following formula: Volume = 0.5 × length (cm) × width2 (cm). Next, a growth curve of the two tumors group was generated. Tumor doubling times (DTs) were calculated using the following formula: DT = ln(2Dt) / ln(V2 / V1), where V1 and V2 are the volume estimates in each scan obtained Dt days apart (9). Tumor-bearing mice received X-ray irradiation when the tumors reached ~1 cm in the longest diameter (13 days after cancer cell implantation). The mice received 16 Gy in 4 fractions delivered over 8 days. Local external beam radiation was applied (6-MV X-rays at a dose rate of 400 MU/min) using a clinical X-ray therapy unit (Precise Elekta; Eleckta, Stockholm, Sweden). Right-sided tumors were locally irradiated, with the rest of the body protected from irradiation with lead shielding. Single posteroanterior external beam radiation fields were used. Irradiated (IR) and non-IR (NIR) groups were created. All animal experiments were performed in accordance with Guangxi Medical University Ethics Committee guidelines.

Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining

The mice were sacrificed 2 weeks after irradiation, and autopsies were performed on all injected mice. Xenograft tumors were excised, immediately placed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin and fixed for 24–48 h. Subsequent to fixation, samples were dehydrated and embedded in paraffin. A series of 4-µm sections were prepared from each specimen, mounted on poly-lysine-coated glass slides and dried for 4–5 h at 37°C to promote adhesion. H&E staining was performed on one section from each specimen.

Tumor tissue immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemical staining of the paraffin sections was performed after dewaxing and rehydrating the sections. Briefly, 4-µm tissue sections were blocked with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 10 min to inactivate endogenous peroxidase activity. Once the tissue sections had been autoclaved at 120°C for 10 min in an antigen retrieval solution [10 mmol/l sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0)], they were incubated overnight at 4°C with a polyclonal rabbit NPM1 antibody (cat. no. 10306-1-AP; 1:100 dilution; ProteinTech Group, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), a polyclonal rabbit anti-annexin A3 (cat. no. ab33068; 1:100 dilution; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) or a monoclonal rabbit nm23-H1 (cat. no. 7948-1; 1:100 dilution; Epitomics, Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA) antibodies. The sections were then incubated with Biotin-conjugated Affinipure goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G(H+L) (cat. no. SA00004-2; 1:200 dilution; ProteinTech Group, Inc.) for 1 h at room temperature, followed by incubation with the streptavidin-biotin complex (cat. no. SA00001-0; 1:200 dilution; ProteinTech Group, Inc.). The color was developed after incubation for 3–5 min with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine solution (0.05%). The sections were then counterstained with hematoxylin and mounted. For the negative controls, the primary antibodies were replaced with phosphate-buffered saline. The sections were observed using light microscopy. The degree of NPM1 protein expression was assessed based on the percentage of positive cells, whereas annexin A3 and nm23-H1 expression were quantified using a computer-based quantitative color image analysis software (Image-Pro Plus 6.0; Media Cybernetics, Bethesda, MD, USA). The mean optical density (MOD) of 10 views was obtained. The relative amounts of annexin A3-positive and nm23-H1-positive cells are expressed as a ratio of the MODs of the CNE-2R and CNE-2 tumors.

Statistical analysis

Data analyses were performed using SPSS version 13.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Differences in protein expression were compared using a one-way analysis of variance. Significance levels were further evaluated using Bonferroni's multiple comparisons tests. All data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Tumor growth characterization

The NIR-CNE-2R tumors grew significantly slower than the NIR-CNE-2 tumors (P=0.025). The doubling times of the NIR-CNE-2R and NIR-CNE-2 tumors were 4.8 and 3.9 days, respectively. CNE-2R tumor volume progression was not inhibited by irradiation, whereas CNE-2 tumor volume was inhibited (Fig. 1). The tumor volume doubling times for the IR-CNE-2R and IR-CNE-2 tumors were 6.2 days and 17.1 days, respectively. The volume increase rate of the IR-CNE-2R tumors was higher than that of the IR-CNE-2 tumors.

Figure 1. Growth curve of non-irradiated (NIR)-CNE-2R tumors, NIR-CNE-2 tumors, irradiated (IR)-CNE-2R tumors and IR-CNE-2 tumors. The tumor volume doubling times of the NIR-CNE-2R, NIR-CNE-2, IR-CNE-2R and IR-CNE-2 tumors were 4.8, 3.9, 6.2 and 17.1 days, respectively.

Histological findings

A large amount of tumor necrosis was observed in the NIR-CNE-2R and NIR-CNE-2 tumors. However, there were only a few scattered necrotic areas observed in the IR-CNE-2R tumors. Following irradiation, extensive degeneration and pyknotic cells were observed in the tumors. Cancer cells were nested, with large nuclei and abundant cytoplasm, and round or oval hyperchromatic nuclei. Keratinization was minimal or absent, and the mitotic rates were variable. The tumor cells possessed morphological characteristics similar to those of human NPC cells.

NPM1, annexin A3 and nm23-H1 immunohistochemical analysis

Immunohistochemical analyses were used to compare NPM1, annexin A3 and nm23-H1 protein expression in the CNE-2 and CNE-2R tumor tissues. For NPM1 immunohistochemistry, positive cells were distinguished by brown staining in the nuclei of the cancer cells (Fig. 2). Annexin A3 and nm23-H1 were predominately expressed in the cytoplasm; therefore, brown granules in the cytoplasm of the carcinoma cells and interstitial cells were considered positive (Figs. 3 and 4). NPM1 and annexin A3 expression was significantly lower in the NIR-CNE-2R tumors compared with that in the NIR-CNE-2 tumors (P=0.007 and P=0.005; Tables I and II), whereas Nm23-H1 expression was significantly higher (P=0.036; Table III). These results are in agreement with results from our previous in vitro study (9). Annexin A3 expression was significantly downregulated in the IR-CNE-2R tumors compared with the IR-CNE-2 tumors (P=0.003; Table II). However, Nm23-H1 protein expression was significantly upregulated (P=0.004; Table III). NPM1 levels were slightly upregulated in the IR-CNE-2R tumors compared with the NIR-CNE-2 tumors; however, the difference was not significant (P=0.731; Table I).

Figure 2. Nucleophospmin expression in different radiosensitive tumors (magnification, ×400). (A) Non-irradiated (NI)-CNE-2 tumor, (B) NI-CNE-2R tumor, (C) irradiated (IR)-CNE-2 tumor and (D) IR-CNE-2R tumor. Arrows indicate positive expression in the cell nuclei.

Figure 3. Annexin A3 expression in different radiosensitive tumors (magnification, ×400). (A) Non-irradiated (NI)-CNE-2 tumor, (B) NI-CNE-2R tumor, (C) irradiated (IR)-CNE-2 tumor and (D) IR-CNE-2R tumor. Arrows indicate predominant expression in the cytoplasm of the cancer cells.

Figure 4. Nm23-H1 expression in different radiosensitive tumors (magnification, ×400). (A) Non-irradiated (NI)-CNE-2 tumor, (B) NI-CNE-2R tumor, (C) irradiated (IR)-CNE-2 tumor and (D) IR-CNE-2R tumor. Arrows indicate predominant expression in the cytoplasm of the cancer cells.

Table I. NPM1 protein expression in xenograft tumor tissues.

Table I.

NPM1 protein expression in xenograft tumor tissues.

Tumors	NPM1, %
NIR-CNE-2	56.3±5.2a
NIR-CNE-2R	36.0±4.2b
IR-CNE-2	35.3±5.5c
IR-CNE-2R	36.3±4.7

a P<0.01 vs. NIR-CNE2R and IR-CNE-2

b P>0.05 vs. IR-CNE-2R

c P>0.05 vs. IR-CNE-2R. NPM1, nucleophosmin; IR, irradiated; NIR, non-irradiated.

Table II. MOD of annexin A3 protein in xenograft tumor tissues.

Table II.

MOD of annexin A3 protein in xenograft tumor tissues.

Tumors	MOD value of annexin A3
NIR-CNE-2	0.062±0.009a,b
NIR-CNE-2R	0.035±0.012c
IR-CNE-2	0.051±0.009d
IR-CNE-2R	0.029±0.007

a P<0.01 vs. NIR-CNE-2R

b P>0.05 vs. IR-CNE-2

c P>0.05 vs. IR-CNE-2R

d P<0.01 vs. IR-CNE-2R. MOD, mean optical density; IR, irradiated; NIR, non-irradiated.

Table III. MOD of nm23-H1 protein in xenograft tumor tissues.

Table III.

MOD of nm23-H1 protein in xenograft tumor tissues.

Tumors	MOD value of nm23-H1
NIR-CNE-2	0.043±0.007a,b
NIR-CNE-2R	0.056±0.007c
IR-CNE-2	0.046±0.007d
IR-CNE-2R	0.079±0.009

a P<0.05 vs. NIR-CNE-2R

b P>0.05 vs. IR-CNE-2

c P<0.01 vs. IR-CNE-2R

d P<0.01 vs. IR-CNE-2R. MOD, mean optical density; IR, irradiated; NIR, non-irradiated.

Discussion

Previous studies have screened for DEPs associated with radioresistance in NPC (4,10). One study identified seven upregulated genes in radioresistant subclones of CNE2. Among these, gp96 and growth differentiation factor 15 showed the highest expression (10). Feng et al (4) identified 34 DEPs using proteomics methods. It was found that the downregulation of 14-3-3σ and Maspin, and the upregulation of heat shock protein family A (Hsp70) member 5 and manganese superoxide dismutase correlated with NPC radioresistance. However, none of these DEPs were validated in vivo.

To identify more reliable markers for radioresistance, a sub-line (termed CNE-2R) was established by exposing CNE-2 cells to a cumulative irradiation dose of 64 Gy (3). In our previous study, proteomic analyses were used to search for potential biomarkers of radioresistance. NPM1, annexin A3 and Nm23-H1 proteins were among the 16 identified DEPs that were regulated more than 2-fold (11). Furthermore, a comparable radioresistant and radiosensitive tumor model of human NPC was established, and the level of these three proteins was compared in vivo. The results indicated that NPM1, annexin A3 and Nm23-H1 protein expression likely correlate with NPC radioresistance.

NPM1 (also known as nucleolar phosphoprotein B23) is a molecular chaperone involved in numerous cellular processes, including centrosome duplication, ribosome biogenesis, cell-cycle progression (12) and DNA damage repair (13). Enhanced NPM1 expression causes uncontrolled cell growth. In tumor cells, NPM overexpression is associated with increased cell growth and proliferation. It has been demonstrated that NPM1 protein levels are inversely associated with cell doubling time in human cancer cells (14). Higher NPM expression is associated with local recurrence rate and/or better disease-free survival in certain types of cancers; therefore, it has been proposed that NPM acts as a marker for oral squamous cell carcinomas (15). Loss of NPM expression contributes to tumorigenesis via its interaction with the protein alternate reading frame, thereby controlling genomic stability (16). Recently, the association between NPM expression and DNA repair has been elucidated. Sekhar et al (5) demonstrated that the inhibition of DNA repair by NPM shuttling inhibition increased the efficacy of DNA-damaging therapeutic strategies such as ionizing radiation. In the present study, NPM1 protein expression was significantly lower in the CNE-2R cells compared with the CNE-2 cells. In vivo tests also showed that NPM1 expression was lower in the NIR-CNE-2R tumors compared with the NIR-CNE-2 tumors. Notably, NPM1 protein expression was slightly higher in the IR-CNE-2R tumors compared with the IR-CNE-2 tumors, which appears paradoxical with NPM1 protein expression levels in non-irradiated tumors. We propose that this may be as the IR-CNE-2R cells have acquired increased DNA damage repair activity.

Annexins are a structurally homologous family of calcium-dependent phospholipid-binding proteins that includes 12 members (17). Annexins have diverse roles regulating membrane trafficking, cell division, differentiation and apoptosis (18). Moreover, they also function in carcinogenesis (19). Annexin A3 is relatively uncommon and is not as well studied as annexin A1 and A2. Although it has not been extensively studied in NPC cells, annexin A3 has prognostic relevance in prostate cancer (20), lung adenocarcinoma (21) and papillary thyroid cancer (22). Skvortsova et al (6) identified annexin A2 and A3 as novel biomarkers in prostate cancer cell lines using two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight (TOF)/TOF-mass spectrometry; however, annexin A3 was not verified. In the present study, annexin A3 was first screened as a downregulated protein in the CNE-2R cells, and was also verified using western blot analyses (11). In vivo tests showed that annexin A3 expression was significantly lower in the NIR-CNE-2R tumors than in the NIR-CNE-2 tumors. These results suggested that annexin A3 may function in NPC radioresistance. However, its mechanism of action requires further clarification.

The Nm23-H1 protein, encoded by the Nm23-H1 gene, is a ubiquitously distributed nuclear diphosphate kinase that catalyzes the phosphorylation of nucleoside diphosphates (23). Recently, the 3′-5′ exonuclease activity of Nm23-H1 was found to be important for DNA repair, as it maintains genomic stability after ionizing or ultraviolet irradiation (24,25). Kim et al (7) found that the overexpression of Nm23-H1, and specifically its nuclear translocation, may be a powerful predictor of radioresistance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. These studies suggested that the functional mechanism of Nm23-H1 nuclear translocation may play a role in DNA damage repair, which may affect radioresistance. The present study found that Nm23-H1 protein expression was significantly higher in the CNE-2R cells compared with the CNE-2 cells in vitro, as well as being higher in the IR-CNE-2R tumors compared with the IR-CNE-2 tumors. We propose that Nm23-H1 may correlate with DNA damage repair. It is likely that the CNE-2R xenograft tumor cells acquired more DNA damage after irradiation. We hypothesize that this is the reason for the CNE-2R cells obtaining radioresistance.

In conclusion, the present study established a comparable radioresistant and radiosensitive tumor model of human NPC. Furthermore, it was found that abnormal NPM1, annexin A3 and nm23-H1 expression may contribute to NPC radioresistance and thus be potential biomarkers for predicting NPC response to radiotherapy.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 30860329) and the GuangXi Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 0832229).

References