p53 as a prognostic marker associated with the risk of mortality for oral squamous cell carcinoma

  • Authors:
    • Tommaso Cutilli
    • Pietro Leocata
    • Vincenza Dolo
    • Emma Altobelli
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: June 16, 2016     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2016.4742
  • Pages: 1046-1050
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is often associated with a poor prognosis. The purpose of the present study was to investigate survival and the risk of mortality in OSCC with regard to stage, tumor site and p53 expression. A retrospective study was performed on 150 non‑consecutive cases of OSCC that were observed between January 1992 and January 2012, and were selected from a total of 580 patients according to the criteria of the homogeneity of histopathological grading (G2). The medical records were reviewed for 48 cases with disease at stage I [37 males, age 64.7±5.7 years (mean age±standard deviation); 11 females, age 70.0±3.37 years]; 27 cases with stage II (15 males, age 64.5±5.6 years; 12 females, age 69.2±3.9 years); 58 cases with stage IVa (42 males, age 66.9±5.3 years; 16 females, age 64.2±6.5 years); and 17 cases with stage IVb (16 males, age 65.7±5.4 years; 1 female, age 69 years). Monoclonal p53 antibody (clone DO‑7) was used to perform the p53 immunohistochemical study. A significant association was found between the site of the tumor and p53 overexpression (P<0.0001). Stage I‑II cases showed a higher cumulative probability of a 24‑month survival time than stage IVa‑IVb cases (P<0.0001). Cheek, floor and soft palate tumors showed a worse prognosis (P<0.0001) and tumors with p53 overexpression >50% showed a poor survival rate (P<0.0001) compared with tumors of the attached gingiva, tongue and retromolar trigone. The findings allowed the quantification of the risk mortality from OSSC with regard to stage, tumor site and the p53 expression pattern of the tumor. Data supported the absolute indications for wide surgical margins (radical surgery) in cases of T1‑T2 N0 tumors of the tongue, floor, retromolar trigone and attached gingiva when p53 overexpression is >50% in association with a higher risk of mortality compared with when p53 overexpression is <50%.

Introduction

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is among the 10 most common cancers worldwide and it is often associated with a poor prognosis despite the marked progress in surgical methods, particularly the introduction of microvascular reconstructive techniques, and the significant progress of chemotherapy and radiotherapy (1,2). It should be emphasized that approximately two-thirds of cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage of disease (stage III–IV) and that tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging often does not explain the clinical behavior of the tumor (36). For this reason, several studies have been performed on the biological patterns of the tumor, which are closely connected with its behavior (greater or lesser aggressiveness) and can predict the prognosis. Oncogenes expressed at varying percentages and associated modifications of chromosomal sites have been identified in oral tumors (413). The p53 tumor suppressor gene (expressed in 4–50% of cases) is the most studied oncogene detected on chromosome 17, and it is clear that preliminary knowledge of the p53 status may be of great assistance in managing OSCC (1418).

Following previous studies on p53, we were recently able to verify that p53 overexpression >50% indicates a poor prognosis in advanced oral tumors (1921). Indeed, p53 overexpression >50%, detected by the simple, reliable, routine examination of immunohistochemical analysis, is associated with a high probability of mutation in this tumor suppressor gene, with a poor response to sequential multimodality treatments (21).

However, it appears equally important to know the pattern of this marker in all stages of OSCC. The evolution of stage I–II is not yet well known with regard to the behavior of the advanced stages, with data concerning this derived only from clinical experience (22,23).

It is not sufficient to know that clinically, an advanced stage of the tumor is more serious than an early stage. The risk of mortality must be quantifiable for all stages.

The purpose of the present study was to perform a survival analysis and investigate the risk of mortality with regard to variables such as tumor stage (stages I, II, IVa and IVb), oral tumor site and p53 expression in OSCC, in order to obtain useful information in addition to the classical factors of screening.

Patients and methods

A retrospective study of 150 non-consecutive cases of stage I, II, IVa and IVb OSCC that were observed and treated by resection between January 1992 and January 2012 in the Maxillofacial Surgery Operative Unit (San Salvatore City Hospital, L' Aquila, Italy), were selected from a total of 580 patients, according to the inclusion criteria of the homogeneity of G2 histopathological grading (G1, well-differentiated; G2, moderately-differentiated; and G3, undifferentiated). The G2 grading diagnosis was based on moderate cellular differentiation. The patients were all smokers.

Immunohistochemical staining procedures were performed according to the manufacturer's protocols. Paraffin sections (4-µm thick) were mounted on poly-L-lysine-coated glass slides, dewaxed, dehydrated, placed in 0.1 M citrate buffer (pH, 0.6) and microwaved twice for 15 min. Endogenous peroxidase activity was then blocked with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 30 min. Incubation with monoclonal mouse anti-human antibodies against p53 (clone DO-7; catalog no. GA616; 1:50 dilution; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) was then performed. Next, the sections were treated with streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase complex, follwed by immersion in diaminobenzidine-H2O2 substrate, for 5 min at room temperature, for chromogen development. The sections were finally counterstained with hematoxylin. A known p53-positive OSCC specimen was used as a positive control. Substitution of the primary antibody with non-immune serum served as a negative control. The p53 labeling index was calculated by assessing the nuclear immunopositivity in 1,000 neoplastic cell in 10 high-power fields using a double-headed micropscope (BX51; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan; this was considered positive when there was ≥10% immunostaining.

Cancer staging was performed in accordance with the 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer sixth edition staging criteria (24).

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation and range. The differences in p53 expression levels according to the tumor site were evaluated using the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test.

Survival analysis was performed to describe the overall mortality, and prognostic factors were analyzed by univariate analysis. The product limit method (Kaplan-Meier) was used to evaluate the probability of survival to 24 months with respect to the following variables: Age, gender, site of tumor, TNM stage and p53 overexpression >50%. Differences between survival curves were assessed using the log-rank test. Multivariate (proportional hazard model) analysis was used to estimate prognostic variables and associated risks of mortality. The results have been expressed as the conditional relative risk of mortality and 95% confidence intervals. P<0.05 was used to indicate a statistically significant difference, and statistical tests were performed using SAS/STAT 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Results

The mean ages and age ranges of the patients were as follows: Stage I, 37 males (64.7±5.7 years; range, 54–75 years) and 11 females (70.0±3.37 years; range, 65–75 years); stage II, 15 males (64.5±5.6 years; range, 57–74 years) and 12 females (69.2±3.9 years; range, 63–74 years); stage IVa, 42 males (66.9±5.3 years; range, 55–75 years), 16 females (64.2±6.5 years; range, 54–75 years); and stage IVb, 16 males (65.7±5.4 years; range, 57–74 years) and 1 female (69 years).

A significant association was found between the site of the tumor and p53 overexpression (P<0.0001). The distribution frequency of tumor site according to p53 overexpression was as follows: Tongue, 42.9%; floor, 21.4%; retromolar trigone, 11.9%; attached gingiva, 9.5%; and cheeks and soft palate, 7.1%.

The cumulative survival rate of the entire group after 24 months of follow-up was 70.3% (standard error, 3.9). The results of the univariate analysis for the prognostic meaning of the main explanatory variables are shown in Table I. The log-rank test indicated that 3 prognostic factors were significantly correlated with prognosis. Stage I and stage II tumors showed a higher cumulative probability of 24 months of survival (97.9 and 96.3%, respectively) compared with stage IVa and IVb (40.2 and 45.2%, respectively) (P<0.0001). With regard to the site of tumor in the cohort examined, the cheek, the floor and the soft palate showed the worst prognosis when compared with tumors of the attached gingiva, tongue and retromolar trigone, with a cumulative probability of 24 months of survival at 22.2, 25.9 and 27.8%, respectively (P<0.0001). Tumors with p53 overexpression >50% showed a cumulative probability of a 24-month survival time of 47.4%, while tumors with p53 expression <50% showed a cumulative probability of 80.8% (P<0.0001) (Table I; Figs. 13). Table II shows the results of multivariate analysis, including the variables considered at the univariate analysis. Age (>65 years), advanced tumor stage (stage IVa and IVb; RR=13.07 and 11.50, respectively), tumor location (soft palate, floor and cheek; RR=8.94, 13.86 and 9.31, respectively) and high p53 expression (>50%; RR=5.59) were significantly associated with an increased risk of mortality.

Table I.

Survival analysis for clinical characteristics and p53 expression.

Table I.

Survival analysis for clinical characteristics and p53 expression.

VariableNo. of patients (n=96, 64%)No. of mortalities (n=54, 36%)Cumulative probability of 24 months of survival, %Log-rank test (P-value)
Age, years
  ≤65363263.90.05
  >65602276.2
Gender
  Male684170.50.65
  Female281370.1
Stage
  I43  597.9<0.0001
  II23  496.3
  IVa233540.2
  IVb  71045.2
Site
  Attached gingiva321972.5<0.0001
  Cheek  1  822.2
  Floor  3  625.9
  Soft palate  2  427.8
  Tongue431281.1
  Retromolar trigone15  585.0
p53 expression, %
  >50142847.4<0.0001
  ≤50822680.8

Table II.

Proportional hazards model according to variables considered.

Table II.

Proportional hazards model according to variables considered.

VariableNo. of patientsNo. of mortalitiesRR Cox model95% CIP-value
Age, years
  <653632   1.00a
  >656022  0.570.33–0.980.04
Gender
  Female6841   1.00a
  Male2813  0.860.46–1.610.86
Stage
  I43  5   1.00a
  II23  4  1.440.39–5.350.59
  IVa233513.075.06–33.73<0.001
  IVb  71011.503.89–33.87<0.001
Site
  Retromolar trigone3219   1.00a
  Tongue  1  8   1.420.46–4.360.54
  Attached gingiva  3  6   2.250.76–6.620.14
  Soft palate  2  4   8.942.18–36.740.002
  Floor431213.863.72–51.64<0.001
  Cheek15  5   9.312.77–31.330.0003
p53 expression, %
  ≤501428   1.00a
  >508226   5.593.23–9.67<0.001

a Reference category. CI, confidence interval.

A representative case of OSCC of the retromolar trigone is shown in Fig. 4.

Discussion

Knowledge of the oncogenetic pattern of a tumor can explain its natural history and behavior in single cases. Thus, a number of oncogenetic studies of oral cancer have been performed to identify prognostic and predictive markers (413).

The p53 tumor suppressor gene is correlated with oral tumor induction and progression, and its significant role as a prognostic marker was found in previous studies in advanced oral tumors (21).

The aim of the present study was to quantify the risk of mortality for all stages of OSCC. It is important to note that the cohort of patients considered was not consecutive due to the inclusion criteria used; thus, the distribution sites of the oral neoplastic lesions were different from those found in consecutive series.

Patients were selected on the basis of homogeneous G2 histopathological grading. This allowed more significance to be assigned to acquired data, as even more emphasis could be placed, in the single case, on the oncogenetic pattern and the specific biological features of neoplastic tissue, and the association with the risk of mortality. Three prognostic factors were found to be significantly associated with the prognosis.

These results fulfill the aim of the present study. The study also shows that an age of >65 years is a variable that has an effect on survival, significantly increasing the risk of mortality compared with an age of <65 years. In addition, it is important to highlight the fact that patients with a floor tumor site exhibited a significantly higher risk of mortality than other sites.

Surgery is the main treatment for OSCC. Advanced oral tumors require wide resections and complex reconstruction using multimodal protocols (25,26). Basic cancer research results are useful for maxillofacial surgeons and oncological teams in the management of the stage IV, but the possibility of having prognostic markers is perhaps even more important for the stages I and II.

Indeed the association found between p53 overexpression and the tumor site increases the indications for a wide resection associated with a prophylactic selective neck dissection in cases of T1-T2 N0 localized tumors of the tongue, the floor of the mouth, the retromolar trigone and the attached gingiva, but also in the cheek and soft palate, particularly when p53 overexpression results are >50% (Fig. 4) (27). A previous study verified that 50% linked p53 antibody in histopathological specimens appears to be a significant cut-off value. Percentages >50% of the expressed oncogene show a high probability of genetic mutation, which compromises the genic product and its related cellular function (21).

In the present study, survival analyses of the examined cases of OSCC show that four variables have an effect on survival, with a significantly increased risk of mortality: An age >65 years; an advanced stage, IVa and IVb; the site of the tumor; and p53 immunoexpression >50%.

These data indicated that, in oral cancer, every variable that was considered, such as tumor site, showed a worse prognosis, particularly when correlated with an altered p53 expression pattern. This can explain the natural history and behavior of the tumor, and the prognosis in single cases, while the classic clinical and radiological parameters, humoral markers and histopathological grading are not reflective.

The results of the present study allowed the quantification of the risk of mortality for OSSC with regard to the stage, the site and the p53 expression pattern of the tumor. The results also emphasized the importance of preliminary knowledge of the pattern of p53 as a prognostic marker of survival in order to obtain the best chance for a cure for these tumors in terms of the best surgical and therapeutic options.

References

1 

Durmus K, Apuhan T and Ozer E: Transoral robotic surgery for retromolar trigone tumours. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 33:425–427. 2013.PubMed/NCBI

2 

Freudlsperger C, Bodem JP, Engel E and Hoffmann J: Mandibular reconstruction with a prefabricated free vascularized fibula and implant-supported prosthesis based on fully three-dimensional virtual planning. J Craniofac Surg. 25:980–982. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Bànkfalvi A and Piffkò J: Prognostic and predictive factors in oral cancer: The role of the invasive tumor front. J Oral Pahol Med. 29:291–298. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Jan JC, Hsu WH, Liu SA, Wong YK, Poon CK, Jiang RS, Jan JS and Chen IF: Prognostic factors in patients with buccal squamous cell carcinoma: 10-year experience. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 69:396–404. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Liao CT, Huang SF, Chen IH, Kang CJ, Lin CY, Fan KH, Wang HM, Ng SH, Hsueh C, Lee LY, et al: Outcome analysis of patients with pN2 oral cavity cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 17:1118–1126. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Holmes JD, Martin RA and Gutta R: Characteristics of head and neck cancer patients referred to an oral and maxillofacial surgeon in the United States for management. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 68:555–561. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Pérez-Sayáns M, Somoza-Martín JM, Barros-Angueira F, Reboiras-López MD, Gándara Rey JM and García-García A: Genetic and molecular alterations associated with oral squamous cell cancer (Review). Oncol Rep. 22:1277–1282. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Schwartz JL: Biomarkers and molecular epidemiology and chemoprevention of oral carcinogenesis. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 11:92–122. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Shah NG, Trivedi TI, Tankshali RA, Goswami JA, Shah JS, Jetly DH, Kobawala TP, Patel KC, Shukla SN, Shah PM and Verma RJ: Molecular alterations in oral carcinogenesis: Significant risk predictors in malignant transformation and tumor progression. Int J Biol Markers. 22:132–143. 2007.PubMed/NCBI

10 

Shah NG, Trivedi TI, Tankshali RA, Goswami JV, Jetly DH, Shukla SN, Shah PM and Verma RJ: Prognostic significance of molecular markers in oral squamous cell carcinoma: A multivariate analysis. Head Neck. 31:1544–1556. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Shillitoe EJ, May M, Tale V, Lethanakul C, Enseley JF, Strausberg RL and Gutkind JS: Genome-wide analysis of oral cancer-early results from the cancer genome anaromy project. Oral Oncol. 36:8–16. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Murugan AK, Munirajan AK and Tsuchida N: Ras oncogenes in oral cancer: The past 20 years. Oral Oncol. 48:383–392. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Saito T, Nakajima T and Mogi K: Immunohistochemical analysis of cell cycle-associated proteins p16, pRb, p53, p27 and Ki-67 in oral cancer and precancer with special reference to verrucous carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med. 28:226–232. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Sidransky D, Boyle J and Koch W: Molecular screening. Prospects for a new approach. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 119:1187–1190. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Boyle JO, Hakim J, Koch W, van der Riet P, Hruban RH, Roa RA, Correo R, Eby YJ, Ruppert JM and Sidransky D: The incidence of p53 mutations increases with progression of head and neck cancer. Cancer Res. 53:4477–4480. 1993.PubMed/NCBI

16 

Jones A: A general review of the p53 gene and oral squamous cell carcinoma. Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg. 14:66–69. 1998.PubMed/NCBI

17 

Nylander K, Dabelsteen E and Hall PA: The p53 role molecule and its prognostic role in squamous cell carcimonas of the head and neck. J Oral Pathol Med. 29:413–425. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Tandon S, Tudur-Smith C, Riley RD, Boyd MT and Jones TM: A systematic review of p53 as a prognostic factor of survival in squamous cell carcinoma of the four main anatomical subsites of the head and neck. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 19:574–587. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Cutilli T, Papola F and Corbacelli A: p53 overexpression and mutation, chemoresistance and patient survival in oral and maxillofacial squamous carcinoma. J Chemother. 9:123–124. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Cutilli T, Papola F, Di Emidio P and Corbacelli A: p53 tumor suppressor protein and H-RAS oncogene in maxillofacial tumors: Immunohistochemical and genetic investigaion, induction chemotherapy response and prognosis evaluation. J Chemother. 10:411–417. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Cutilli T, Leocata P, Dolo V and Altobelli E: Evaluation of p53 protein as a prognostic factor for oral cancer surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 51:922–927. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Green FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, Fritz AG, Balch CM, Haller DG and Morrow M: AJCC cancer staging manual. 6th. Springer; New York: 2002, View Article : Google Scholar

23 

World Health Organization = IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: Biological Agents. 100B. A review of human carcinogens. International Agency for Research on Cancer; Lyon: 2012

24 

Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, Fritz AG, Balch CM, Haller DG and Morrow M: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th. Springer-Verlag; New York, NY: 2002, View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Specenier P and Vermorken JB: Advances in the systemic treatment of head and neck cancers. Curr Opin Oncol. 22:200–205. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Jenwitheesuk K, Surakunprapha P, Chowchuen B, Tangvoraphongchai V, Pesee M, Krusun S and Supaadirek C: Results of multidisciplinary therapy of squamous cell carcinoma of the buccal mucosa at Srinagarind Hospital, Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai. 93:1262–1267. 2010.PubMed/NCBI

27 

Hakeem AH, Pradhan SA, Tubachi J and Kannan R: Outcome of per oral wide excision of T1-2 N0 localized squamous cell cancer of the buccal mucosa-analysis of 156 cases. Laryngoscope. 123:177–180. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

August-2016
Volume 12 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Cutilli T, Leocata P, Dolo V and Altobelli E: p53 as a prognostic marker associated with the risk of mortality for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Lett 12: 1046-1050, 2016.
APA
Cutilli, T., Leocata, P., Dolo, V., & Altobelli, E. (2016). p53 as a prognostic marker associated with the risk of mortality for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oncology Letters, 12, 1046-1050. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2016.4742
MLA
Cutilli, T., Leocata, P., Dolo, V., Altobelli, E."p53 as a prognostic marker associated with the risk of mortality for oral squamous cell carcinoma". Oncology Letters 12.2 (2016): 1046-1050.
Chicago
Cutilli, T., Leocata, P., Dolo, V., Altobelli, E."p53 as a prognostic marker associated with the risk of mortality for oral squamous cell carcinoma". Oncology Letters 12, no. 2 (2016): 1046-1050. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2016.4742