Killian‑Jamieson diverticulum mimicking a calcified thyroid nodule on ultrasonography: A case report and literature review

Introduction

Ultrasonography (US) of the thyroid is a well-established method for evaluating thyroid nodules. However, occasionally, non-thyroidal lesions such as diverticula may be confused with thyroid nodules on physical examination or imaging studies (1–3).

Pharyngoesophageal diverticula, including Killian-Jamieson diverticulum (KJD) and Zenker's diverticulum (ZD), are rare hypopharyngeal diverticula that could easily be misdiagnosed as thyroid nodules (2,4,5). ZD was reported to be the most common diverticula of the esophagus, but the rate of KJD was only about a forth of that of ZD (6,7). In a small number of patients, KJD and ZD can coexist (8). The two types of diverticula protrude through a muscular gap of anatomical weakness in the cervical esophagus near the cricopharyngeus muscle. KJD originates in the anterolateral wall just inferior to the cricopharyngeus muscle and superolateral to the longitudinal muscle of the esophagus (9), whereas ZD originates in the posterior wall above the cricopharyngeus, which protrudes posteriorly, and usually projects to the left (10). Few clinicians or sonographers are aware of the possibility of diverticula mimicking thyroid nodules.

The current study presents a case of an asymptomatic unilateral KJD that mimicked a calcified thyroid nodule, and reviews the literature of this uncommon presentation. This will enable clinicians to view another source of information on the subject and means that unnecessary invasive procedures such as surgery can be avoided.

Case report

A 40-year-old man presented with a suspected thyroid nodule that was identified incidentally on a routine checkup in a local hospital on November 10, 2014. Thyroid US demonstrated a hypoechoic nodule in the left thyroid lobe. The patient presented with no dysphagia, hoarseness, regurgitation, odynophagia, halitosis, chronic coughing, neck discomfort, gastroesophageal reflux symptoms or fever, and the medical and surgical histories were unremarkable. The patient was subsequently referred to Nanfang Hospital (Guangzhou, Guangdong, China) for further evaluation on December 14, 2014. The physical examination of the head and neck was unremarkable. In addition, laboratory data revealed no abnormalities. Serum triiodothyronine, thyroxine and thyroid-stimulating hormone concentrations were 0.88 ng/mL (normal range, 0.60–1.81 ng/ml), 7.3 µg/dl (normal range, 4.5–10.9 µg/dl) and 2.22 mIU/l (normal range, 0.55–4.78 mIU/l), respectively, and no thyroid autoantibodies were detected. A further US examination was performed following admission, which showed a 1.3×1.0-cm hypoechoic lesion containing internal-hyperechoic foci and a hypoechoic rim in the upper portion of the left thyroid gland, suggesting papillary carcinoma with punctate calcifications (Fig. 1). On power Doppler imaging, the lesion also showed internal vascularity. The rest of the thyroid gland was normal. No pathological lymphadenopathy was noted at the time. The patient reported a history of hypertension for 2 years that was not treated by medication, with the highest blood pressure reaching 140/90 mmHg (normal values, <120/80 mmHg).

Figure 1. Transverse sonogram showing a 1.1×1.0-cm hypoechoic nodule (arrow) in the upper portion of the left thyroid lobe with internal hyperechoic foci (arrowhead) and a hypoechoic rim.

In order to remove the suspected malignant thyroid nodule, the patient underwent a left thyroid lobectomy and a neck exploration under general anesthesia on December 19, 2014, taking care not to injure the recurrent laryngeal nerve, which runs in the tracheoesophageal groove. However, when surgical cutdowns were performed for the removed left thyroid gland tissue, no visible suspected tumor was observed, only calcification. Histopathological examination revealed a (left thyroid) nodular goiter with focal calcifications. During the further exploration, a sac was found protruding from the left anterolateral wall of the cervical esophagus, which is visible under the cricopharyngeus muscle (Fig. 2). The sac was located ~5 mm lateral to the point where the recurrent laryngeal nerve enters the pharynx. Considering the diverticulum was asymptomatic and small, further surgery was not performed. The wound was closed in layers with placement of a closed suction drain. The drain was removed on post-operative day 2. On post-operative day 3, subsequent upper gastrointestinal radiography on the anteroposterior (Fig. 3A) and lateral (Fig. 3B) projections demonstrated a 1.3×1.0-cm KJD originating from the left wall of the esophagus (C6-C7 level). To confirm the diagnosis of an esophageal diverticulum, the patient was administered a swallow test during US on post-operative day 4. When the patient swallowed, multiple hyperechoic spots were observed (Fig. 4). Real-time US was performed showing that the movements of the hyperechoic spots were consistent with air and water moving into the esophagus. Transient changes were also demonstrated, including an increase in the size of the lesion, a reduction in the definition of the margins and heterogeneous echogenicity of the contents of the lesion. The patient recovered without complications such as nerve damage or hemorrhage, and was then discharged from hospital. During the 3-month follow-up observations, the patient did not show any abnormalities, such as diverticular relapse, dysphagia or stenosis.

Figure 2. Intraoperative image obtained during the neck exploration after the left thyroid lobectomy showing a left-sided hypopharyngeal diverticulum sac protruding from the left anterolateral wall of the cervical esophagus, which is visible under the cricopharyngeus muscle. The black arrow indicates the diverticulum and the white arrow indicates the trachea.

Figure 3. Pharyngoesophagography on day 3 after the left thyroid lobectomy on (A) anteroposterior and (B) lateral projections showing a sac-like outpouching structure (white arrow) arising from the anterolateral wall of the cervical esophagus, suggesting a left Killian-Jamieson diverticulum.

Figure 4. Transverse sonogram obtained on repeat ultrasonography examination on day 4 after the left thyroid lobectomy showing the connection between the nodule and the esophageal wall. In the swallow test, changes in the hyperechoic lesions and internal echogenic foci were observed to be consistent with air and water moving into the esophagus.

Discussion

KJD is an outpouching from the lateral wall of the proximal cervical esophagus. KJD protrudes through a muscular gap called the KJ triangle, which was first described by Killian and then confirmed by Jamieson (11,12). The muscular gap is in the anterolateral wall of the proximal esophagus, inferior to the cricopharyngeus muscle and superolateral to the longitudinal muscle of the esophagus (11–13).

The pathogenesis of KJD is unclear. It is hypothesized that the KJD is the result of a functional outflow obstruction in the esophagus, the anatomical muscle weakness of the KJ space, high intraluminal pressure building against a weakness in the gastrointestinal tract wall or food residue accumulation within the diverticulum, with possible non-specific chronic inflammation within and around the diverticulum resulting in esophageal dysmotility (10,14).

Previously reported cases of KJD mimicking thyroid nodules were reviewed in the present study to determine the clinical and US characteristics of KJD (9,10,14–17). The following terms were searched in the title and/or abstract of articles published in the PubMed database on December 26, 2014: ‘Killian-Jamieson diverticula’, ‘Killian-Jamieson diverticulum’ or ‘KJD’. Ultimately, 10 cases of KJD, including the present case, were analyzed (Table I). Of the 10 patients reviewed, 6 patients were men and 4 were women. The mean age of all 10 patients was 57.8 years, with a range of 40–77 years. In total, 12 KJD were detected on pharyngoesophagograms in 10 patients, including 7 (70%) with unilateral left-sided diverticula, 1 (10%) with right-sided diverticula and 2 (20%) with bilateral diverticula. Additionally, 6 out of the 10 patients exhibited no symptoms, with the exception of 1 patient, who exhibited a neck mass. The remaining 4 patients exhibited symptoms such as dysphagia, coughing, hoarseness, gastroesophageal reflux and a globus sensation. The mean maximal dimension of the diverticula was 2.95 cm, ranging from 1.1–10 cm. A total of 7 patients were treated with surgical intervention, including fine-needle aspiration (FNA), open surgical excision of the diverticulum or endoscopic diverticulotomy.

Table I. Clinical and ultrasonographic findings of Killian-Jamieson diverticulum presenting as a thyroid nodule reported in the literature.

Table I.

Clinical and ultrasonographic findings of Killian-Jamieson diverticulum presenting as a thyroid nodule reported in the literature.

First author, year	Age/gender	Chief complaint	Size, cm	Side	Surgical intervention	(Ref.)
Boisvert et al, 2010	69/M	Progressive dysphagia, nighttime coughing, hoarseness and gastroesophageal reflux	Left: 3.5 Right: 4.4	Bilaterally	Yes	(9)
Kim et al, 2012	55/F	Increased size of known thyroid nodule	4.0	Left	Yes	(10)
	50/M	Incidentally detected	1.2	Left	Yes
	55/M	Incidentally detected	1.2	Left	No
	59/F	Incidentally detected	1.7	Left	No
Tang et al, 2008	51/F	Dysphagia, a globus sensation posterior to the sternum	1.5	Left	Yes	(14)
Kim et al, 2012	68/M	Epigastric pain	10.0	Right	Yes	(15)
Mimatsu et al, 2013	77/F	Mild dysphagia	Left: 4.0 Right: 1.5	Bilaterally	Yes	(16)
Pang et al, 2009	54/M	Incidentally detected	1.1	Left	Yes	(17)
Present study	40/M	Incidentally detected	1.3	Left	No

[i] F, female; M, male

Unlike the other pharyngoesophageal diverticulum, ZD, which is more common and symptomatic, KJD is smaller and more likely to be asymptomatic, resulting in its increased chance to be misdiagnosed as a thyroid nodule (5). As in the present study, the study by Rubesin and Levine (8) found KJD to be asymptomatic in the majority of patients (89%). Dysphagia, coughing and epigastric pain are the most common symptoms experienced by patients with KJD (1). Retention of food material in the diverticulum may lead to regurgitation after meals and chronic coughing, and even to aspiration pneumonia, particularly in large diverticula (8).

Esophageal diverticula are usually detected incidentally by an esophagography. On occasion, diverticula can be found by thyroid US when they mimic thyroid nodules (10). The diagnostic rate is closely associated with the doctor's working attitude and practical skill. Due to the existence of air bubbles and food material, diverticula can be imaged as heterogeneous internal echoes with strong echogenic foci, which strongly suggest microcalcifications of papillary thyroid cancer (4,18). Thus, in order to avoid unnecessary treatment resulting from a misdiagnosis, principles to distinguish between esophageal diverticula and thyroid nodules should be noted clearly. Kim et al summarized the US characteristics of esophageal diverticula (10). The real-time US used in a swallow test may be of great assistance. When the patient was swallowing, the hyperechoic lesions and internal echogenic foci may change to be consistent with air and water moving into the esophagus, as in the present case (19). However, it should be mentioned that these changes and even the connection with the esophageal wall cannot be observed in all cases, suggesting a further barium swallow pharyngoesophagography is necessary when a diverticulum is considered (20,21).

When a diverticulum masquerades as a thyroid nodule, FNA may be performed to obtain a pathological diagnosis (3). However, complications have not been recorded or reported in such cases. To the best of our knowledge, as the KJ triangle is directly adjacent to the entry point of the recurrent laryngeal nerve into the larynx, FNA or endoscopic treatment is quite dangerous (6). If patients have large diverticula or are symptomatic, they should be treated with surgical intervention. Therefore, it is important to note that careful dissection in this area is necessary to avoid nerve injury. We recommend that FNA or endoscopic treatment should be chosen cautiously. However, the traditional open surgical approach is currently being challenged by the use of endoscopic diverticulotomy (22). One of the potential explanations for this may be its advantage of intracavitary drainage over open surgical treatment. Time is required to prove which one technique is more efficient.

In conclusion, the present study reported the case of a man who presented with a ‘suspected malignant thyroid nodule’ in the left thyroid gland, and subsequently underwent left thyroid lobectomy and a neck exploration. During the surgery, the nodule was identified as a KJD. The present findings suggest that real-time US and pharyngoesophagography are important techniques to distinguish a KJD from a thyroid nodule, so that unnecessary surgical intervention can be avoided. Open surgical or endoscopic diverticulotomy is required when patients have large diverticula or are symptomatic, although the preference for either technique is controversial. However, considering that the recurrent laryngeal nerve crosses the KJ space, we suggest that FNA or endoscopic treatment should be chosen cautiously in order to avoid nerve injury.

References