Synchronous and bilateral oncocytic carcinoma of the breast: A case report and review of the literature

Introduction

Oncocytic tumors, including oncocytomas and oncocytic carcinomas, are comprised of oncocytic cells. The term ‘oncocyte’ was initially used to refer to a cellular change in the salivary glands by Hamperl in 1931 (1). Oncocytes are cells with an eosinophilic granular and reticular cytoplasm and, in the majority of cases, immunohistological analysis by light microscopy reveals that >60% of the cytoplasm is occupied by mitochondria (2). Oncocytic tumors are occasionally observed in the salivary gland, thyroid gland, kidney, parathyroid gland and pituitary gland (3–8).

Oncocytomas and oncocytic carcinomas, which are commonly used terms for benign and malignant tumors, respectively (3), are comprised of oncocytic cells. Oncocytic carcinoma of the breasts is extremely rare (9). It was first reported by Gădăleanu and Craciun in 1987 (10), and 48 cases have since been reported, 15 of which were diagnosed retrospectively (9).

Oncocytes and apocrine cells exhibit similar appearances following hematoxylin and eosin staining. Apocrine metaplasia is frequently observed in breast lesions. When eosinophilic tumor cells are observed, a diagnosis of oncocytic carcinoma should be considered, and immunohistochemical or electron microscopic analysis is advisable (2,11,12). A previous study reported that the clinical features of oncocytic carcinoma are similar to those of other types of invasive carcinomas (9).

The present study reports a case of synchronous bilateral oncocytic carcinoma of the breast, which is extremely rare but is considered important to the pathogenesis of oncocytic carcinoma.

Case report

A 78-year-old Japanese woman exhibited bilateral breast tumors on chest computed tomography (CT) during surveillance following an operation for colon cancer. The patient's medical history included non-insulin-dependent diabetes, acromegaly, hypertension and colon cancer. Six months previously, the patient had been diagnosed with colon cancer, and an ileocecal resection was performed. Adjuvant chemotherapy with 300 mg/day oral tegafur/uracil plus 75 mg/day calcium folinate (Taiho Pharmaceutical, Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was administered for 4 weeks (including a 1 week rest) and continued for a total of four cycles. Contrast-enhanced chest CT revealed three hyperdense masses in the breasts: Two in the right breast and one in the left (Fig. 1). Core needle biopsies were performed on the three tumors. Tumor cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm were identified in all three lesions (Fig. 2). The tumors were diagnosed as invasive ductal carcinoma, with potential apocrine carcinoma. As no metastasis was detected radiologically, the patient was treated with a bilateral modified radical mastectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy in a single session. Intraoperative pathological diagnosis showed no metastasis in the sentinel nodes. The patient did not undergo further treatment and was followed-up every 3 months by blood and imaging examinations. She remained free of relapse and metastasis for 7 months after the surgery.

Figure 1. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). (A) CT scans revealed bilateral enhanced solid tumors (white arrowheads). (B) An additional tumor was revealed in the right breast (arrowhead).

Figure 2. Histopathological findings of the core needle biopsy. Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the (A) right upper outer quadrant, (B) right outer quadrant and (C) left upper inner quadrant identified tumor cells with eosinophilic cytoplasms in all three lesions. Main image magnification, ×100; inset panel magnification, ×400.

Macroscopic examination of the resected breasts revealed three white solid masses: One in the right upper outer quadrant (13×12×10 mm), one in the right outer quadrant (10×7×10 mm) and one in the left upper inner quadrant (17×15×12 mm) (Fig. 3). Histologically, all of the tumors were comprised of solid cell sheets and nests of tumor cells. The tumor cells possessed abundant eosinophilic granular cytoplasm (Fig. 4). Invasion into the fat was observed in the right breast.

Figure 3. Macroscopic appearance of the surgical specimen. Three solid tumors were observed. (A) Two tumors were present in the right breast and (B) one tumor was present in the left breast (black arrowheads).

Figure 4. Histopathological findings of the surgical specimens. Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the (A) right upper outer quadrant, (B) right outer quadrant and (C) left upper inner quadrant revealed tumor cells with abundant eosinophilic granular cytoplasms in all three tumors. Main image magnification, ×100; inset panel magnification, ×400.

Immunohistochemical analysis was performed using an autostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. Tucson, AZ, USA). Breast tissue sections (4-µm) were incubated with mouse anti-cytokeratin-7 (1:200; cat. no. M7018; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), mouse anti-epithelial membrane antigen (1:100; cat. no. 247M-96; Cell Marque Corporation, Rocklin, CA, USA), mouse anti-E-cadherin (1:100; cat. no. M3612; Dako), mouse anti-gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (1:50; cat. no. SIG-3611-1000; Covance, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA), mouse anti-mitochondria (1:500; cat. no. B-MU213UC; BioGenex, San Ramon, CA, USA), rabbit anti-estrogen receptor (prediluted; cat. no. 518-107925; Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland), rabbit anti-progesterone receptor (prediluted; cat. no. 790-2223; Roche Diagnostics) and anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (prediluted; cat. no. 518107918; Roche Diagnostics) antibodies. The primary antibodies were visualized using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies and the ultraView Universal DAB Detection kit (cat. no. 760-500; Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.), after which the sections were counterstained for 1 min with Carrazzi's hematoxylin solution. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were positive for cytokeratin-7, epithelial membrane antigen and E-cadherin (data not shown). Additionally, gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 showed a diffuse and weakly positive reaction (data not shown). Notably, all three tumors were strongly positive for mitochondria in the majority of the tumor cells (Fig. 5). The peritumoral lesion contained ductal epithelia with eosinophilic cytoplasm, which also demonstrated strong reactivity for anti-mitochondrial antibody (Fig. 6). The tumor cells were negative for estrogen and progesterone receptors. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 was weakly positive along the membrane and was scored 1+ using the HercepTest (Dako), according to the manufacturer's protocol (data not shown) (13). Electron microscopy performed on formalin-fixed tumor tissue revealed numerous mitochondria (Fig. 7). Based on these findings, the tumors were diagnosed as synchronous bilateral oncocytic carcinoma of the breast.

Figure 5. Immunohistochemical staining of the surgical specimens. More than 70% of the tumor cells were strongly positive for mitochondria. (A) Right upper outer quadrant. (B) Right outer quadrant. (C) Left upper inner quadrant. Mitochondrial staining with an anti-mitochondria antibody. Main image magnification, ×100; inset panel magnification, ×400.

Figure 6. Immunohistochemical staining of the surgical specimens counterstained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE). Oncocytic cells were observed in the peritumoral lesion, which also showed reactivity for anti-mitochondrial antibody. (A) Right upper outer quadrant. HE staining. (B) Right upper outer quadrant. Mitochondrial staining. (C) Right outer quadrant. HE staining. (D) Right outer quadrant. Mitochondrial staining. (E) Left upper inner quadrant. HE staining. (F) Left upper inner quadrant. Mitochondrial staining. Magnification, ×100.

Figure 7. Ultrastructural features of the oncocytic carcinoma, as determined by electron microscopy. Mitochondria were scattered throughout the cytoplasm. Magnification, ×3,000.

Discussion

Oncocytic carcinoma of the breast is defined as a tumor in which >70% of tumor cells demonstrate oncocytic characteristics, and is classified as ‘uncommon’ according to the World Health Organization classification (14). To the best of our knowledge, only six cases of oncocytic carcinoma of the breast had been previously reported before Ragazzi et al reviewed 32 cases in 2011 (9–11,15,16). The tumor is characterized by oncocytic tumor cells containing numerous mitochondria (14).

Candidates for the differential diagnosis of oncocytic carcinoma include ductal carcinoma with partial apocrine differentiation, acinic cell carcinoma, apocrine carcinoma, granular cell tumors and metastatic carcinoma arising from eosinophilic granular cytoplasm (17,18). On routine hematoxylin and eosin staining of specimens, it is difficult to recognize eosinophilic cells as oncocytes (19). Immunohistochemical or electron microscopic analyses are required to distinguish these neoplastic cells (3,9). Apocrine metaplasia is frequently observed in breast lesions (20). The cells of apocrine metaplasia typically exhibit abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm containing brightly eosinophilic granules, and secretory ‘snouts’ are typically observed by light microscopy (20). Ultrastructurally, the cytoplasm of granular cell tumors is packed with numerous lysosomes, and apocrine cells contain abundant granules surrounding the nuclei (12,19). Oncocytic carcinoma is characterized by strong immunopositivity for mitochondria, and numerous mitochondria fill the cytoplasm when examined by electron microscopy (2). The present study reported a case involving a patient with synchronous and bilateral oncocytic carcinoma. In the present case, immunohistochemistry for mitochondria revealed markedly positive signals in the cytoplasm, and electron microscopy demonstrated large numbers of mitochondria. These findings supported the diagnosis of oncocytic carcinoma of the breast.

Oncocytic cells are occasionally observed in glandular epithelia that have high metabolic activity, including that in the salivary glands, thyroid gland, kidney, parathyroid gland and pituitary gland (3–8). However, the mechanism of oncocytic change remains to be fully elucidated; it has been reported that oncocytic change may be a type of senescent change. Previous studies have noted that increased oncocytic changes in the salivary glands and liver are associated with senescence and the administration of certain drugs (21–23). Frequent mitochondrial DNA abnormalities have been observed in oncocytic lesions in the thyroid gland, kidney, salivary glands, adrenal cortex and parathyroid gland (6,24). A small number of cases in the thyroid have exhibited mutations in nuclear DNA genes encoding oxidative phosphorylation proteins (24). Geyer et al (25) reported chromosomal changes in oncocytic carcinoma of the breast. Oncocytic carcinoma of the breast frequently exhibits gains of 11q13.1–13.2 and 19p13, similar to oncocytic tumors of the kidney and thyroid. In the present case, non-neoplastic duct epithelia adjacent to the tumor demonstrated oncocytic changes. Although gene mutations were not analyzed in the present case, the oncocytic carcinoma of the breast may have been derived from ducts with oncocytic changes.

A review of the literature reveals that the clinical features of oncocytic carcinomas are similar to those of invasive ductal carcinoma, not otherwise specified (9). Thus, the therapeutic strategies are identical. However, to the best of our knowledge, no previous reports have described the use and effects of radiation therapy for the treatment of oncocytic carcinoma of the breast, due to the rarity of this tumor. Resistance to radiotherapy has been reported in oncocytic tumors at other sites, including the rectum and meninges (26,27). Thus, certain modifications may be required to utilize radiotherapy in the treatment of oncocytic carcinoma of the breast.

Bilateral breast cancer is uncommon and represents 2–6% of all breast carcinomas (28). Synchronous carcinoma is defined as a second cancer diagnosed within 3 months of the diagnosis of a first cancer (28). Although both synchronous breast cancer and oncocytic carcinoma of the breast are uncommon, synchronous bilateral oncocytic carcinoma of the breast is extremely rare (9,29,30). Thorough follow-up is important, and additional clinicopathological studies are required to analyze effective treatments for oncocytic carcinoma.

In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that it is difficult to diagnose oncocytic carcinoma of the breast merely by light microscopy. To distinguish breast neoplasms composed of tumor cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasms from oncocytic carcinoma, immunohistochemical or electron microscopy analyses should be performed.

References