Use of laser capture microdissection allows detection of loss of heterozygosity in chromosome 9p in breast cancer

  • Authors:
    • Margarida Figueiredo Dias
    • Robert Blumenstein
    • Jose Russo
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: March 22, 2017     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.5892
  • Pages: 3831-3836
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The present study was designed to determine whether loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in the p arm of chromosome 9 in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast is detected during the neoplastic progression of the disease. Using laser capture microdissection (LCM) epithelial cells were isolated from 14 invasive ductal carcinoma cases (IDC), ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS), normal mammary lobules, skin and/or lymph nodes of paraffin embedded tissue sections. LOH analysis of chromosome 9p was performed utilizing the microsatellite markers D9S199, D9S157, D9S171, D9S265 and D9S270. The highest frequency of LOH was observed in invasive ductal carcinomas, which reached a maximum at the 9p22‑23 chromosomal location (D9S157). In addition, DCIS lesions presented a high frequency of LOH in 9p22‑23 (D9S157), followed by 9p21 (D9S171), D9S199 and D9S265, which were similar in frequency to those observed in IDC. A novel finding was the intralesional heterogeneity in LOH within the same DCIS or IDC case. This is an indication that clones of cells that differ in genetic composition coexist in the same lesion. Notably, phenotypically normal breast tissues adjacent to IDC or DCIS exhibited LOH at D9S157 and/or D9S171. Together, these data indicate that LOH of chromosome arm 9p occurs very early in the progression of cancer and that different clones of cells co‑exist within a single tumor.

Introduction

Human cancer arises through the accumulation of genetic alterations in multiple oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. However, the exact timing of the majority of molecular genetic events during carcinogenesis and their correlation with defined histopathological stages are largely unknown. (17). Invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of the breast is the result of a multistep process, beginning with ductal hyperplasia and followed by atypical ductal hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), invasive ductal carcinoma and metastatic disease (13). Previous studies in the literature (810) indicate that alterations in the p arm of chromosome 9 may be a common denominator in human cancer, and may have a role in the early stages of breast cancer, including ductal hyperplasia and DCIS (1114). Of interest is the finding that loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in the p arm of chromosome 9 may be involved in the pathogenesis of breast cancer (1519).

In the present study, laser capture microdissection (LCM) was used to analyze paraffin-embedded tissues of the normal breast, ductal hyperplasia, DCIS and IDC to obtain DNA from selected populations of cells for molecular genetic analysis (2022). LCM was used in order to obtain cells with a high degree of purity in their phenotypes, without contamination of stromal, inflammatory or other cells that could interfere with final conclusions of molecular analysis. The isolated cells representing different stages of breast cancer progression were used for detecting LOH using five microsatellite markers: D9S199, D9S 157, D9S 171, D9S265 and D9S270. The present study was conducted in an attempt to investigate the intratumoral heterogeneity and to associate chromosomal alterations with morphologic findings and proliferation state of the tumor.

Materials and methods

Tissue samples

Paraffin blocks from fourteen primary breast IDC cases (mean age, 56; range, 27–86) that also contained areas of carcinoma in situ were selected for the present study. Paraffin blocks containing areas of normal tissue, including breast, skin and lymph nodes, were available from the same patients. Tissue blocks were obtained from the tumor bank of the Breast Cancer Research Laboratory of the Fox Chase Cancer Center (FCCC; Philadelphia, PA, USA). Six serial 5-µm sections were obtained from each paraffin-embedded tissue block and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). The first section was coverslipped and the remaining five sections were dehydrated and air dried for their use in LCM and DNA extraction. Tissue sections containing IDC were selected on the basis that DCIS was also present in the same section. The histopathological type of the carcinoma was classified according to previously described criteria (23). Control tissues consisted of phenotypically normal cells, which were obtained by LCM from: a) Type 1 lobules or terminal duct lobular units (TDLUs) (24); b) normal skin obtained from the mastectomy specimen; or c) lymph nodes free of metastases obtained from axillary dissection from the same patient. This study was approved by the Ethical Review Board (IRB 93–031) of the FCCC and informed consent was obtained from patients for use of their tissue.

LCM

Serial 5-µm thick sections containing IDC, DCIS and normal tissue were utilized for microdissection. Areas containing IDC, DCIS or normal tissue were identified in the slide that had been stained with H&E and coverslipped. Preferentially, areas containing microscopically homogeneous cells of each type of lesion were selected. Tissues containing areas with dense stroma, inflammatory cells, vascular or lymphatic vessels, muscle or adipose tissue were avoided. Uncoverslipped serial 5-µm sections slides were carefully matched with the respective area identified in the coverslipped stained slide for verifying the accuracy of the type of lesion selected for dissection. Tissue sections were microdissected using a PixCell laser capture microdissection apparatus (Arcturus Engineering, Mountain View, CA, USA) fitted with cap in which a transparent thermoplastic film (ethylene vinyl acetate polymer) was bonded to the underside. A cap was placed on the specific lesion or normal tissue selected for dissection under visual inspection by the operator. Then an infrared laser pulse was activated and selected cells were transferred to the undersurface of the cap, which was lifted off the tissue; the cells obtained at each one of these laser shots were termed ‘a capture’. This process was repeated successively in adjacent areas of the same lesion twenty times using a 30-µm diameter laser beam. The caps containing the captured tissues were placed into a 500-µl microcentrifuge tube for molecular processing. Multiple foci from three to ten different areas of in situ cancer, invasive carcinoma and ‘normal’ tissue were individually microdissected and separately analyzed (Fig. 1). Finally, direct visualization of the transferred tissue by light microscopy of the capsule verified that the desired cells had been captured.

DNA extraction

DNA extraction from the selected tissues was performed following the protocol provided by PixCell II™ (Arcturus Engineering, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA) Selected tissues were digested for 16 h at 42°C in buffer containing: 10 mM Tris-HCL (pH 8.8), 1 mM EDTA, 1% Tween-20 and 0.05% Proteinase K. The lysate was heated at 96°C for 8 min to inactivate Proteinase K and aliquots of 2 µl of this lysate were used directly as templates for PCR.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and microsatellite analysis

Five microsatellite markers mapped to the short arm of chromosome 9 (D9S199, D9S157, D9S171, D9S265 and D9S270) were used for LOH analysis. Primers for PCR amplification were obtained from Research Genetics Inc. (Huntsville, AL, USA) and all primer sequence position of the markers, their levels of heterozygosity and distances were obtained from Genome Database version February 2000 (Research Genetics, Inc.). PCRs were carried out according to published study (25). The samples were denatured for 5 min at 94°C and loaded onto a 6% polyacrylamide gel. Electrophoresis was performed at room temperature at 1,400 V for 2–3 h, depending on the length of the marker. Following electrophoresis, gels were transferred to a 3 mm Whatman paper, dried and autoradiographed using Kodak X-OMAT 35×43 film. Films were developed after a 48 to 72-h exposure. Autoradiograms were analyzed following the guidelines of published work (8).

Results

Invasive ductal carcinomas exhibited LOH for the five markers tested, and the marker at 9p22-23 (D9S157) was the most frequently identified, whereas the markers D9S171, D9S199, D9S265 and D9S270 (Fig. 1) were less frequently detected. LOH in the DCIS samples was found with 4/5 of the markers tested. D9S157 locus was also present in the majority of the samples, followed by 9p21 (D9S171), D9S199 and D9S265. There are several reports in the literature indicating that other tumor suppressor gene(s) may reside within different 9p loci, namely 9p22-23 (8,15,17,2628). Notably, phenotypically normal breast tissues that were adjacent to IDC and DCIS also exhibited LOH at D9S157 (Fig. 2) and/or D9S171. The finding that LOH at these loci is also present in the normal tissue adjacent to either DCIS or IDC is an indication that microsatellite instability is an early event in the pathogenesis of breast cancer, and occurs even earlier than any morphological changes are able to be identified. The present study pursued further the validation of these observations by performing LCM of normal skin and lymphocytes from lymph nodes free of metastatic disease from 7 of the patients and was unable to detect LOH in these other normal tissues. (Fig. 3). This data supports previous observations reported in the literature (29). It is notable that the practical implications of these observations are of major importance in the evaluation of the resected margins of conservative breast surgery.

A novel finding was that LOH was heterogeneous in its distribution, as it was exhibited in certain foci, but not in all of the tumor foci studied (Fig. 4), suggesting that clones of cells with varied genetic composition co-exist in the same lesion.

Discussion

The present data indicate that LOH at locus 9p22-23, (D9S157) and to a lesser degree at 9p21 (D9S171), occurs during the process of cancer initiation. More notably, clones of cells co-exist within a single tumor, indicating that they do not share a clonal origin and only those cells that have LOH at those loci may progress. The monoclonal origin of cancer has been suggested in the literature (3032), and cytogenetic analyses have revealed that breast cancers are polyclonal (3335). The use of LCM (3638) has allowed the identification of more chromosomal aberrations than is possible using DNA isolated from tumor sections (39). By contrast to previous reports (7,4042) that sustained clonal derivation from in situ cancer, the data presented in the current study support the findings of Fujii et al (8), who reported LOH heterogeneity in multiple foci of individual DCIS lesions.

In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that more than one clone of cells may exist in a simple lesion and that genetic divergence occurs during cancer initiation and progression.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by National Cancer Institute (grant nos. CA64896 and CA67238). Dr Margarida Dias has a fellowship from The Luso-American Foundation for Development. The authors would like to thank Dr Quivo Tahin for the critical analysis of the microsatellite DNA polymorphism data, to Dr Xiang Ao for the preparation of the slides used in laser capture microdissection and to Dr Irma H. Russo (Breast Cancer Research Laboratory, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia PA, USA) for the critical appraisal of the manuscript.

References

1 

Russo J, Yang X, Hu YF, Bove BA, Huang Y, Silva ID, Tahin Q, Wu Y, Higgy N, Zekri A and Russo IH: Biological and molecular basis of human breast cancer. Front Biosci. 3:D944–D960. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Werner M, Mattis A, Aubele M, Cummings M, Zitzelsberger H, Hutzler P and Höfler H: 20q13.2 amplification in intraductal hyperplasia adjacent to in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Virchows Arch. 435:469–472. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Harris JR and Hellman S: Natural history of breast cancerDiseases of the Breast. Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M and Hellman S: Lippincott Raven; Philadelphia, PA: pp. 375–391. 1996

4 

Lakhani SR: The transition from hyperplasia to invasive carcinoma of the breast. J Pathol. 187:272–278. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Werner M, Mattis A, Aubele M, Cummings M, Zitzelsberger HH, Hhutzler P and Höfler H: 20q13.2 amplification in intraductal hyperplasia adjacent to in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Virchows Arch. 435:469–472. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Eiriksdottir G, Sigurdsson A, Jonasson JG, Agnarsson BA, Sigurdsson H, Gudmundsson J, Bergthorsson JT, Barkardottir RB, Egilsson V and Ingvarsson S: Loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 9 in human breast cancer: Association with clinical variables and genetic changes at other chromosome regions. Int J Cancer. 64:378–382. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Kuukasjärvi T, Karhu R, Tanner M, Kähkönen M, Schäffer A, Nupponen N, Pennanen S, Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP and Isola J: Genetic heterogeneity and clonal evolution underlying development of asynchronous metastasis in human breast cancer. Cancer Res. 57:1597–1604. 1997.PubMed/NCBI

8 

Fujii H, Marsh C, Cairns P, Sidransky D and Gabrielson E: Genetic divergence in the clonal evolution of breast cancer. Cancer Res. 56:1493–1497. 1996.PubMed/NCBI

9 

Czerniak B, Chatuverdi V, Li L, Hodges S, Johnston D, Ro JY, Luthra R, Logothetis C, Von Eschenbach AC, Grossman HB, et al: Superimposed histologic and genetic mapping of chromosome 9 in progression of human urinary bladder neoplasia: Implications for a genetic model of multistep carcinogenesis and early detection of urinary bladder cancer. Oncogene. 18:1185–1196. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Campbell IG, Foulkes WD, Beynon G, Davis M and Englefield P: LOH and mutation analysis of CDKN2 in primary human ovarian cancers. Int J Cancer. 63:222–225. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Nakanishi H, Wang XL, Imai FL, Kato J, Shiiba M, Myia T, Imai Y and Tanzawa H: Localization of a novel tumor suppressor gene loci on chromosome 9p21-22 in oral cancer. Anticancer Res. 19:29–34. 1999.PubMed/NCBI

12 

Murphy DS, Hoare SF, Going JJ, Mallon EE, George WD, Kaye SB, Brown R, Black DM and Keith WN: Characterization of extensive genetic alterations in ductal carcinoma in situ by fluorescence in situ hybridization and molecular analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 87:1694–1704. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Berns EM, Klijn JG, Smid M, Van Staveren IL, Gruis NA and Foekens JA: Infrequent CDKN2 (MTS1/p16) gene alterations in human primary breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 72:964–967. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Quesnel B, Fenaux P, Philippe N, Fournier J, Bonneterre J, Preudhomme C and Peyrat JP: Analysis of p16 gene deletion and point mutation in breast carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 72:351–353. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Xu L, Sgroi D, Sterner CJ, Beauchamp RL, Pinney DM, Keel S, Ueki K, Rutter JL, Buckler AJ and Louis DN: Mutational analysis of CDKN2 (MTS1/p16INK4) in human breast carcinomas. Cancer Res. 54:5262–5264. 1994.PubMed/NCBI

16 

Brenner AJ and Aldaz M: Chromosome 9p allelic loss and p16/CDK_N2 in breast cancer and evidence of p16 inactivation in immortal breast epithelial cells. Cancer Res. 55:2892–2895. 1995.PubMed/NCBI

17 

An HX, Niederacher D, Picard F, Van Roeyen C, Bender HG and Beckmann MW: Frequent allele loss on 9p21-22 defines a smallest common region in the vicinity of the CDKN2 gene in sporadic breast cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 17:14–20. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Minobe K, Onda M, Iida A, Kasumi F, Sakamoto G, Nakamura Y and Emi M: Allelic loss on chromosome 9q is associated with lymph node metastasis of primary breast cancer. Jpn J Cancer Res. 89:916–922. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Cairns P, Polascik TJ, Eby Y, Tokino K, Califano J, Merlo A, Mao L, Heath J, Jenkins R, Westra W, et al: Frequency of homozygous deletion at p16/CDKN2 in primary human tumors. Nat Genet. 11:210–212. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Dutrilaux B, Gerbault-Senreau M and Zafrani B: Characterization of chromosomal abnormalities in human breast cancer. A comparison of 30 paradiploid cases with few chromosome changes. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 49:203–217. 1990.PubMed/NCBI

21 

Emmert-Buck MR, Bonner RF, Smith PD, Chuaqui RF, Zhuang Z, Goldstein SR, Weiss RA and Liotta LA: Laser capture microdissection. Science. 274:998–1001. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Bonner RF, Emmert-Buck M, Cole K, Pohida T, Chuaqui R, Goldstein S and Liotta LA: Laser capture microdissection: Molecular analysis of tissue. Science. 278:1481–1483. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Simone NL, Bonner RF, Gillespie JW, Emmert-Buck MR and Liotta LA: Laser capture microdissection: Opening the microscopic frontier to molecular analysis. Trends Genet. 14:272–276. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Russo J and Russo IH: The pathology of breast cancer: Staging and prognostic indicators. J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972). 47:181–187. 1992.PubMed/NCBI

25 

Russo J, Gusterson BA, Rogers AE, Russo IH, Wellings SR and van Zwieten MJ: Comparative study of human and rat mammary tumorigenesis. Lab Invest. 62:244–278. 1990.PubMed/NCBI

26 

Kellogg DE, Rybalkin I, Chen S, Mukhamedova N, Vlasik T, Siebert PD and Chenchik A: TaqStart Antibody: ‘hot start’ PCR facilitated by a neutralizing monoclonal antibody directed against Taq DNA polymerase. Biotechniques. 16:1134–1137. 1994.PubMed/NCBI

27 

Wu Y, Barnabas N, Russo IH, Yang X and Russo J: Microsatellite instability and loss of heterozygosity in chromosomes 9 and 16 in human breast epithelial cells transformed by chemical carcinogens. Carcinogenesis. 18:1069–1074. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Muzeau F, Flejou JF, Thomas G and Hamelin R: Loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 9 and p16 (MTS1, CDKN2) gene mutations in esophageal cancers. Int J Cancer. 72:27–30. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Morita R, Fujimoto A, Hatta N, Takehara K and Takata M: Comparison of genetic profiles between primary melanomas and their metastases reveals genetic alterations and clonal evolution during progression. J Invest Dermatol. 111:919–924. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Deng G, Lu Y, Zlotikov G, Thor AD and Smith HS: Loss of heterozygosity in normal tissue adjacent to breast carcinomas. Science. 274:2057–2059. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Nowell PC: The clonal evolution of tumor cell populations. Science. 194:23–28. 1976. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Fialkow PJ: Clonal origin of human tumors. Biochem Biophys Acta. 458:283–321. 1976.PubMed/NCBI

33 

Noguchi S, Motomura K, Inaji H, Imaoka S and Koyamma H: Clonal analysis of human breast cancer by means of the polymerase chain reaction. Cancer Res. 52:6594–6597. 1992.PubMed/NCBI

34 

Teixeira MR, Pandis N, Bardi G, Andersen JA, Mitelman F and Heim S: Clonal heterogeneity in breast cancer: karyotypic comparisons of multiple intra- and extra-tumorous samples from 3 patients. Int J Cancer. 63:63–68. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Teixeira MR, Pandis N, Bardi G, Andersen JA and Heim S: Karyotypic comparisons of multiple tumors and macroscopically normal surrounding tissue samples from patients with breast cancer. Cancer Res. 56:855–859. 1996.PubMed/NCBI

36 

Pandis N, Jin Y, Gorunova L, Petersson C, Bardi G, Idvall I, Johansson B, Ingvar C, Mandahl N and Mitelman F: Chromosome analysis of 97 primary breast carcinomas: Identification of eight karyotypic subgroups. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 12:173–185. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Böni R, Matt D, Voetmeyer A, Burg G and Zhuang Z: Chromosomal allele loss in primary melanoma is heterogeneous and correlates with proliferation. J Invest Dermat. 110:215–217. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar

38 

Ornstein DK, Englert C, Gillespie JW, Paweletz CP, Linehan WM and Emmert-Buck MR and Petricoin EF III: Characterization of intracellular prostate-specific antigen from laser capture microdissected benign and malignant prostatic epithelium. Clin Cancer Res. 6:353–356. 2000.PubMed/NCBI

39 

Milchgrub S, Wistuba II, Kim BK, Rutherford C, Urban J, Cruz PD Jr..Gazdar AF: Molecular identification of metastatic cancer to the skin using laser capture microdissection: A case report. Cancer. 88:749–754. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Aubele M, Mattis A, Zitzelsberger H, Walch A, Kremer M, Hutzler P, Höfler H and Werner M: Intratumoral heterogeneity in breast carcinoma revealed by laser-microdissection and comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 110:94–102. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Zhuang Z, Merino MJ, Chuaqui R, Liotta LA and Emmert-Buck MR: Identical allelic loss on chromosome 11q13 in microdissected in situ and invasive human breast cancer. Cancer Res. 55:467–471. 1995.PubMed/NCBI

42 

Radford DM, Phillips NJ, Fair KL, Ritter JH, Holt M and Donis-Keller H: Allelic loss and the progression of breast cancer. Cancer Res. 55:5180–5183. 1995.PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

May-2017
Volume 13 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Dias MF, Blumenstein R and Russo J: Use of laser capture microdissection allows detection of loss of heterozygosity in chromosome 9p in breast cancer. Oncol Lett 13: 3831-3836, 2017
APA
Dias, M.F., Blumenstein, R., & Russo, J. (2017). Use of laser capture microdissection allows detection of loss of heterozygosity in chromosome 9p in breast cancer. Oncology Letters, 13, 3831-3836. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.5892
MLA
Dias, M. F., Blumenstein, R., Russo, J."Use of laser capture microdissection allows detection of loss of heterozygosity in chromosome 9p in breast cancer". Oncology Letters 13.5 (2017): 3831-3836.
Chicago
Dias, M. F., Blumenstein, R., Russo, J."Use of laser capture microdissection allows detection of loss of heterozygosity in chromosome 9p in breast cancer". Oncology Letters 13, no. 5 (2017): 3831-3836. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.5892