Monoclonal antibodies against autocrine motility factor suppress gastric cancer
- Authors:
- Published online on: April 13, 2017 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.6037
- Pages: 4925-4932
Abstract
Introduction
Phosphoglucose isomerase (PGI), also termed phosphohexose isomerase (PHI), is a glycolytic enzyme that catalyzes the interconversion of glucose-6-phosphate and fructose-6-phosphate in the glycolysis process. A secreted version of PGI/PHI, which has cytokine activity, was originally purified from the conditioned culture medium of human melanoma cells and was termed autocrine motility factor (AMF) owing to its ability to stimulate cell motility (1). Until the respective protein sequences were determined, AMF was termed neuroleukin, a maturation factor mediating differentiation of human myeloid leukemia cells, a myofibril-bound serine proteinase inhibitor, and sperm antigen-36 (2–5). Although the secretion of AMF by normal cells has not been observed, its secretion into culture medium has been identified in various cancer cells. Clinical studies measuring AMF in the serum or urine of patients with lung, gastrointestinal and renal cancer, have suggested that it may be a useful biomarker for certain types of cancer (6,7). In addition to the cell motility stimulating activity, AMF is involved in cellular proliferation (8), cellular survival (9), invasion of malignant cells (10), tumor metastasis (11) and the induction of angiogenesis (12).
AMF binds to and stimulates the AMF receptor (AMFR), which is a 78 kDa glycoprotein (gp78) with seven transmembrane domains (13). When stimulated by AMF, AMFR activates signal transduction pathways that are involved in enhancing cell motility and proliferation and suppressing cell adhesion; these include activation of protein kinase C, the activation and upregulation of Rho-like GTPases and the upregulation of SNAIL (11,14,15). A wide range of clinicopathological studies reviewed by Chiu et al (16), have demonstrated that expression of AMFR was significantly elevated in various kinds of tumor cells compared with adjacent normal tissues.
Studies to date reveal that AMF or AMFR may be a therapeutic drug target, however anticancer drugs targeting these cellular molecules have not yet been developed. Several studies have demonstrated that downregulation of endogenous AMF, using small interfering RNA, interfered with the normal functions of cancer cells by inhibiting the EGF-induced invasion of breast cancer cells (17) or by inducing mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition of human fibrosarcoma, osteosarcoma and endometrial cancer cells (18–20), suggesting that inhibiting AMF activity or downregulating AMF expression would be a useful approach to treat cancer. In the present study, monoclonal antibodies specific to the recombinant human AMF (rhAMF) were selected from a naive human scFv phage display library and evaluated for their antitumor activity and effects on the plasma level of endogenous AMF. This is the first report demonstrating that antibodies targeting AMF have antitumor activity in human tumor-xenografted mice, as well as causing decreased concentrations of AMF in the plasma.
Materials and methods
Cell lines
MRC-5, HEK293, HEK293F, K-562, Huh-7, and HepG2 cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) heat inactivated fetal bovine serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). NCI-N87, A549, and MDA-MB-231 cells were grown in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% heat inactivated fetal bovine serum. HEK293F cells were grown in Expi293™ Expression medium (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). All cell lines, with the exception of Huh-7 and HEK293F, were obtained from the ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA). Huh-7 cells were obtained from The Japanese Collection of Research Bioresources Cell Bank (Osaka, Japan) and HEK293F cells were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
Preparation of recombinant human AMF. E. coli
BL21 (DE3; #RH217; Real Biotech Corporation, Banqiao, Taiwan) on ice for 10 min were transformed with the pET22b (+) vector (#69744; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) containing AMF cDNA, according to the manufacturer's protocol. The transformed E. coli cells in luria broth (Lennox; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) were incubated for 4 h at 37°C with agitation (250 rpm), and induced with 0.1 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside. HEK293F cells were transfected with pcDNA3.1-AMF vector (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) containing AMF cDNA, using polyethylenimine (PEI; Polysciences, Inc., Warrington, PA, USA). The transiently transfected cells were grown in Expi293™ Expression medium at 37°C for 4 days. The transformed E. coli lysate and the transfected HEK293F conditioned culture medium were applied to HisTrap FF (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) equilibrated with 50 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.4) containing 0.5 M sodium chloride. The column-bound fractions were eluted with 50 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.4) containing 0.5 M sodium chloride and 250 mM imidazole, and then dialyzed with PBS (pH 7.4) three times at 201 × g for 10 min at 4°C using VIVA spin 20 (Sartorius AG, Göttingen, Germany) with 30 kDa molecular weight threshold.
SDS-PAGE analysis
The cell lysate of E. coli cells transformed with the pET22b-AMF vector and rhAMF purified from the transformed E. coli cells were separated by electrophoresis on a 10% SDS Tris-glycine polyacrylamide gel. The protein bands were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue R-250 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA).
Western blotting analysis
The E. coli cell lysates and the rhAMF-containing column chromatography fractions were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and blotted onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane using iBlot apparatus (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The blot was blocked with 5% skimmed milk in PBS (pH 7.4) for 2 h at room temperature. The blocked membrane was incubated for 1 h at room temperature with a mouse monoclonal antibody recognizing the His-tag conjugated to rhAMF (#70796-3; dilution, 1:1,000; Novagen; Merck KGaA), then with a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody (KPL, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. The blot was incubated in the presence of tetramethylbenzidine substrate (KPL, Inc.), the reaction was stopped by adding a stop solution (#50-85-01; KPL, Inc.) and the signal was visualized using ChemiDoc XRS+ with Image Lab™ Software (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.).
Measurement of the enzyme activity of AMF
The enzyme activity of a commercial rhAMF (MyBioSource, San Diego, CA, USA) and the purified rhAMFs were measured using a glucose-6-phosphate isomerase activity assay kit (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), according to the manufacturer's protocol.
ELISA for AMF quantification
AMF secreted in the culture medium and AMF in the plasma of Balb/c nude mice were measured using a glucose-6-phosphate isomerase human ELISA kit (Abcam), according to the manufacturer's protocol.
FACS analysis
Cells were suspended at a density of 1×106 cells/ml in PBS (pH 7.4) and incubated in the presence of a fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-AMF receptor (AMFR) antibody (#ab76841; dilution, 1:1,000, Abcam) for 1 h at 4°C in the dark. Subsequent to incubation, the cells were washed 3 times with PBS and incubated in the presence of goat-anti-rabbit IgG H&L (Alexa Fluor 488®; #ab150077, dilution 1:1,000, Abcam) for 1 h at 4 in the dark. The cells were washed 2 times with stain buffer (#554656; BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Subsequently, the cell surface fluorescence was analyzed by flow cytometry using a FACScaliber (BD Biosciences).
Migration assay
Cancer cell motility was measured by a modification of the Boyden chamber assay, using a CytoSelect 96-well cell migration assay kit (Cell Biolabs Inc., San Diego, SD, USA). The MDA-MB-231, A549, NCI-N87 and HepG2 cells (1×106 cells/ml) were incubated in the upper chamber, and 10 µg/ml E. coli-derived rhAMF was added to the lower chamber, which was separated by an 8 µm pore membrane. After 24 h incubation, cells on the upper surface of the membrane were removed by scraping, and the cells on the lower surface were detached using cell detachment solution. The detached cells were lysed and quantified using CyQuant GR fluorescent dye (Cell Biolabs, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer's protocol.
Screening of human monoclonal anti-AMF antibodies
Human monoclonal antibodies against AMF were selected from a naive human scFv (single chain fragment variable) phage display library (a total of ~1011 members, A & R Therapeutics Co., Daejeon, Korea). A total of 4 rounds of biopanning were performed and four clones of anti-AMF antibodies of 9A-4H, 7F4, 8F and 4H were isolated. During each round, AMF-specific phages were selected out of the pool by washing away non-specific binders using PBS-T (PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20). Following 4 rounds, a mixture of highly specific phage clones was separated from a mono clone phage and selected on the basis of affinity and specificity against AMF using indirect ELISA. Briefly, putative AMF-specific phages were added into the well of 96-well plates coated with rh-AMF and incubated for 2 h at room temperature. The wells were washed three times with PBS-T and then anti-M13 HRP antibody (#ab50370; Abcam) was added and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Tetramethylbenzidine substrate was added and the reaction was stopped at 10 min by adding the ABTS® Peroxidase stop solution kit (#50-85-01; KPL, Inc.). The plate was measured at a wavelength of 450 nm. The phage vector from each clone was subjected to sequencing to determine the nucleotide sequence of VL and VH, and then the nucleotide sequences were analyzed and grouped. The VH and VL gene elements of a selected phage were amplified using polymerase chain reaction and then subcloned into mammalian expression vectors (pYG300H and pYG300L, respectively; A & R Therapeutics Co.), each of which contained a constant region of heavy chain and light chain of human IgG1 coding sequence for fully human IgG1 expression. Sequencing was performed using ABI PRISM 3730XL Analyzer (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) to confirm in-frame insertion of each variable region into the expression vectors.
Surface plasmon resonance
The antibody-antigen interaction was examined by surface plasmon resonance spectrometry (SR7500DC; Reichert, Inc., Depew, NY, USA). Prior to antigen immobilization, a Polyethylene Glycol/Carboxyl sensor chip (#13206061; Reichert, Inc.) was first activated with a mixture of 0.1 M 1-ethyl-3- (3-dimethylamminopropryl) carbodiimide hydrochloride and 0.05 M N-hydroxysuccinimide at a flow rate of 20 µl/min for 10 min. Following the activation of the chip surface, 50 µg/ml antigen was flowed over the chip surface. The antigen was immobilized to the surface of the chip via free amine coupling to the immobilized succinimide, followed by quenching the remaining activated succinimide ester with 1 M ethanolamine (pH 8.5). The chip was equilibrated with PBS-T. For the analysis of antibody association, solutions (0, 12.5, 25, 50, 100, 200, 400 and 800 nM) of anti-AMF antibodies, 9A-4H, 4H, 7F4 and 8F, in PBS-T was flowed over the sensor chip at a rate of 30 µl/min for 5 min. For the molecular dissociation, washing buffer was flowed over the sensor chip at a rate of 30 µl/min for 5 min. The chip was regenerated with 20 mM HCl. The data was analyzed using the Scrubber 2.0 software (BioLogic Software; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.).
A549 or NCI-N87 xenograft in nude mice
The six-week-old BALB/c female mice (weighing ~20 g; Charles River Laboratories International, Inc., Yokohama, Japan) were housed under specific pathogen free conditions. Food and water were sterilized prior to use; the light cycles were 12 h light/dark and the temperature was maintained between 20 and 22°C. The animal protocol was reviewed by the Korea University Institutional Animal Care & Use Committee (Seoul, Korea). A549 or NCI-N87 cells suspended in PBS (pH 7.4) were injected subcutaneously in the right flank of the mice at a concentration of 2×107 cells/ml. The intravenous administration of sunitinib (4 or 40 mg/kg, orally administered, once a day for 4 weeks; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck MGaA), cetuximab (4 or 40 mg/kg, intraperitoneal, twice a week for 4 weeks; Namyang Pharm Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea), trastuzumab (15 mg/kg, intravenously twice a week for 2 weeks; Namyang Pharm Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea) or human monoclonal anti-AMF antibodies (9A-4H, 7F4, 8F and 4H; 15 mg/kg, intravenously twice a week for 2 weeks) against E. coli-derived rhAMF, began when the average volume (V0) of the tumors reached ~100 mm3. Tumor volumes (Vt) were measured 3 times a week for 3 weeks using a vernier caliper, and then calculated by the formula 0.5 × height × length × width. At the end of the experiment the mice were sacrificed by CO2 asphyxiation.
Statistical analysis
GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) was used for statistical analysis. One-way ANOVA and Dunnett's post hoc t-test were used for multiple comparisons. Spearman correlation analysis was used to compare the correlation between plasma AMF concentration and tumor weight in A549-xenografted mice. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Preparation and validation of rhAMF
To select the best material for the experiments, rhAMFs from 3 different sources were analyzed and compared. The enzyme activity of rhAMFs purified from the E. coli lysate transformed with the pET22b-AMF vector, rhAMFs present in the culture medium of HEK293F cells transiently transfected with the human AMF cDNA in the pcDNA3.1-AMF vector, and commercial rhAMF were 4.64, 3.50 and 3.64 mU/mg (Table I), respectively. The enzyme activity of rhAMFs prepared from E. coli and HEK293F cells were similar to that of the commercial rhAMF, which was included in the assay for comparison. The identity of the final product purified by the column chromatography method was validated by SDS-PAGE and western blot analyses (Fig. 1A and B). The lanes of the gel loaded with the commercial rhAMF, the soluble fraction from the pET22b-AMF-transformed E. coli lysate, and the 250 mM imidazole elution fraction revealed clear bands stained with Coomassie brilliant blue R-250 at ~55 kDa, which is the expected molecular weight of rhAMF. The bands were identified to be rhAMF by western blot analysis using a monoclonal antibody against the His-tag. The commercial rhAMF was not detected by the western blot analysis since it does not contain a His-tag (Fig. 1B). Since the enzyme activity of E. coli-derived rhAMF was not lower than that of rhAMFs from other sources, and the preparation of E. coli-derived rhAMF is easier than that from HEK293F cells, the following experiment was conducted using E. coli-derived rhAMF.
Effects of E. coli-derived rhAMF on the migration of cancer cells
E. coli-derived rhAMF was examined for its chemoattractive activity upon cancer cells using a Boyden chamber. As shown in Fig. 2, the migration of MDA-MB-231 and A549 cells was significantly increased by treatment with rhAMF. The cell motility of MDA-MB-231 and A549 cells as a result of treatment with rhAMF increased by ~1.6- and 1.9-fold, respectively, compared with that of the control cells. However, the migration of NCI-N87 and HepG2 cells was not significantly changed by treatment with rhAMF.
Effect of the expression of the AMF receptor on the secretion of AMF by cancer cells
In order for a signal to be transmitted into cells by extracellular AMF, the presence of AMFR is required. The relative amount of AMFR was measured in the normal human fibroblast MRC-5 and embryonic kidney HEK293 cells, and in the human gastric carcinoma NCI-N87, hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2, lung carcinoma A549, chronic myelogenous leukemia K-562, hepatocellular carcinoma Huh-7, and breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells using flow cytometry (Fig. 3). The percentage values of cells that express AMFR in HEK293 and MRC-5 cells were 3.57 and 4.93%, respectively. In the case of cancer cells, while the percentage values of cells that express AMFR in K-562, Huh-7, and HepG2 cells were similar to those in the normal cell lines, those in NCI-N87, A549, and MDA-MB-231 cells were 8.71, 8.86, and 11.32%, respectively, which were 1.8 to 3.2 times higher compared with those in the normal cells. In contrast to the expression of AMFR, there were huge differences in the amount of AMF secreted by these cells (Fig. 4). The AMF-specific productivities of NCI-N87 and HepG2 cells were statistically greater (P<0.001) compared with the other groups of cells. While the AMF-specific productivities of NCI-N87 and HepG2 cells were 0.097±0.006 and 0.119±0.011 pg/cell/day, respectively, those of A549, K-562, Huh-7 and MDA-MB-232 cells were no higher than 0.037±0.011 pg/cell/day. The AMF-specific productivities of the normal cell lines, MRC-5 and HEK293, were 0.012±0.001 and 0.000±0.000 pg/cell/day, respectively. These results were in contrast to those demonstrated in Fig. 2, in that NCI-N87 and HepG2 cells secreted endogenous AMF much more actively than the other cell lines, including MDA-MB-231 and A549 cells, whose motilities were more greatly affected by treatment with rhAMF.
Correlation between plasma AMF concentration and tumor growth
To investigate whether there was a correlation between tumor growth and plasma concentration of AMF, A549-xenografted Balb/c nude mice were treated with sunitinib (21), a small-molecule multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and cetuximab (22,23), a chimeric anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (Fig. 5). Blood and tumors were collected at the end of the experiments, the plasma concentration of AMF and the tumor weights were measured, and the correlation between plasma AMF concentration and tumor weight was analyzed by the Spearman's rank correlation method (Fig. 5). The results reveal that the plasma AMF concentration became lower as the tumor weight decreased upon treatment with sunitinib and cetuximab. As demonstrated with a Spearman's rank coefficient of 0.785 obtained from the analysis of the correlation between the plasma AMF concentration and tumor weight, there was a relatively good correlation between the two factors.
Selection of human monoclonal anti-AMF antibodies
In total, 4 human monoclonal antibodies (9A-4H, 4H, 7F4 and 8F) specific for AMF were selected from a naive human scFv phage display library using biopanning. The binding kinetics of the anti-AMF human monoclonal antibodies with E. coli-derived and HEK293F-derived rhAMF were measured using surface plasmon resonance (Table II). The equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) values of these 4 monoclonal antibodies with E. coli-derived rhAMF were similar to those with HEK293F-derived rhAMF, however, the KD value of 8F with E. coli-derived rhAMF may not be obtained due to a lack of detectable dissociation from the immobilized ligand. Among these 4 antibodies, 9A-4H and 7F4 had somewhat lower affinity for the two rhAMFs than the 8F and 4H antibodies. Since the binding kinetics of these antibodies with rhAMFs derived from two different sources were similar, the following experiments, to investigate the effect of AMF on the migration of cancer cells, were performed with E. coli-derived rhAMF, which may be easily prepared compared with the method using the human cell line.
Table II.Surface plasmon resonance binding kinetics of anti-AMF human monoclonal antibodies with rhAMF. |
Effects of the monoclonal antibodies on tumor growth and plasma AMF concentration
Among the 4 monoclonal antibodies (9A-4H, 4H, 7F4, and 8F), only 9A-4H and 7F4 significantly inhibited the growth of tumors in NCI-N87-xenografted mice (Fig. 6A). Monoclonal antibody 9A-4H caused the greatest inhibition among the four monoclonal antibodies, with an inhibition rate slightly higher than that caused by trastuzumab, a HER2 inhibitor, which was included as a positive control. The concentration of AMF in plasma collected from the mice at the end of the experiments demonstrated a similar pattern to the inhibition of tumor growth (Fig. 6B). The mean plasma AMF concentration of the Balb/c nude mice treated with 9A-4H and trastuzumab were significantly decreased compared with that of the control Balb/c nude mice (P<0.01). Although it was not statistically significant, the mean concentration of AMF in the plasma of the mice treated with 7F4 was decreased compared with the control mice.
Discussion
The most important characteristics of cancer cells are uncontrolled proliferation and metastatic ability, which allow a tumor to grow indefinitely and transfer to distant organs, respectively. Although there has been certain progress in the improvement of 5-year survival rates of cancer patients due to tremendous effort to elucidate avenues to treat cancers, the majority of cancers, with a few exceptions including thyroid and non-melanoma skin cancer, are still a great threat to humans. Although molecularly-targeted therapeutics, including imatinib (24) and bevacizumab (25), have provided specific evidence that current approaches to cancer treatment are being somewhat successful, newer and improved therapeutics are always requested in the clinic since resistant cancers are being continuously exposed to traditional and the most recent anticancer agents (26). In view of these matters, AMF, which is highly secreted by various cancers, is a valuable anticancer drug target as it is involved in cell proliferation, survival, metastasis and angiogenesis (8–11). The signal stimulated by AMF is transmitted into the cell through AMFR. In previous studies using immunocytochemistry (ICC) staining in tumors obtained from patients, positivity of AMFR expression in the tumor cells was defined when >10% of the cells exhibited AMFR staining (27,28). However, in the present study using flow cytometry analysis, only MDA-MB-231 cells, among which 11.32% were positive, satisfied this criterion. NCI-N87 and A549 cells contained 8.71 and 8.86% positive cells, which were slightly lower than that of MDA-MB-231 cells, however, the values were increased compared with those of the normal MRC-5 and HEK293 cell lines. The 10% guideline used to define positivity in ICC staining may not be appropriate for the present study, which used flow cytometry analysis that may be able to analyze the proportion of cells more precisely. It appears that NCI-N87 and A549 cells, as well as MDA-MB-231 cells, are defined as positive in expressing AMFR since the expression level of AMFR in these cell lines was increased compared with that in normal cell lines.
Although it is known that AMF is secreted by various types of cancer, the amount of AMF secreted into the media by cancer cells was greatly variable. Cancer cells originating from digestive organs, including NCI-N87 and HepG2 cells, secreted much more AMF than the other types of cancer cells examined in the present study. However, it is too early to decide if there is an association between the amount of AMF secretion and the organ from which the cancer cells originated. In contrast to the amount of AMF secreted by the cancers, the motility of the cells affected by AMF revealed a different pattern. While the motility of NCI-N87 and HepG2 cells was not increased by treatment with exogenous AMF, the motility of MDA-MB-231 and A549 cells was significantly increased. Since there are no studies to date regarding the analysis of the association between the amount of AMF secretion and the amount of AMFR expression in the same cells, it is difficult to say how this happened. One possibility is that AMFR in the cells highly expressing their own AMF, including NCI-N87 and HepG2 cells, may be desensitized. Another possibility is that AMF secreted by cancer cells may produce effects in normal cells near the tumor (29), and subsequently, the normal cells may provide molecules required by the tumor. Thus, in addition to the other previously reported roles of AMF, AMF produced by NCI-N87 and HepG2 cells may serve a role as a paracrine factor, effecting normal cells such as the endothelial cells of blood vessels.
There are studies that AMF has been detected in the urine and plasma of cancer patients (6,7), however, what happens to the level of AMF in the plasma of humans and animal treated with anticancer agents has not been reported. The present study reveals, for the first time, that the plasma concentration of AMF decreased with a reduction in tumor weights in A549-xenografted mice treated with sunitinib or cetuximab. In order to be able to answer the question whether this decrease in plasma AMF concentration contributed to the reduction in tumor weight, further study using AMF inhibitors is necessary.
An antibody specific to AMFR, the 3F3A anti-AMFR IgM monoclonal antibody, has been widely used to identify the presence of this receptor (30), however, it does not have an inhibitory effect on the action of AMF. Antitumor effects of an antibodies specific to AMF have not yet been reported, nevertheless the present study demonstrates that at least two monoclonal antibodies specific to AMF, which were selected from a phage display library, revealed antitumor activity in the NCI-N87-xenografted mouse model, to the same extent as trastuzumab. In addition to tumor growth inhibition, the monoclonal antibody 9A-4H, specific to rhAMF, reduced the plasma concentration of AMF. This result demonstrates that 9A-4H may not only inhibit the action of AMF but may also decrease the secretion of AMF by tumors. Although it is difficult to say how this inhibition of AMF by 9A-4H is connected to the decrease in the plasma concentration of AMF, there is a possibility that the binding of 9A-4H interferes with the paracrine or autocrine activity of AMF secreted by the tumor, which is required for further tumor growth. As a result, the growth of tumors decreases, with a subsequent reduction in the amount of AMF secretion.
Trastuzumab is an anticancer agent that was approved for use in patients with HER2-overexpressing breast cancer and HER2-overexpressing metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (31). The present study also revealed that trastuzumab decreased the plasma AMF concentration as well as the weight of tumors produced from a gastric cancer cell line. A previous study demonstrated that AMF secretion was inhibited in HER2 knocked down breast cancer cells, and positively correlated with the overexpression of HER2 (32). The reduction in the plasma concentration of AMF as a result of trastuzumab may have occurred, at least in part, due to its inhibitory effect on HER2 expressed in HER2-positive NCI-N87 cells. Taken together, the present study demonstrates that AMF secretion correlated with tumor weight, and the inhibition of AMF by specific antibodies induced suppression of tumor growth. Although further study is required to obtain a clear understanding regarding the role of AMF in vivo, these results suggest that monoclonal antibody 9A-4H may be a valuable drug candidate for the treatment of gastric cancer.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Area-Wide Economic Regional Coalition and Cooperation Program through the Korea Institute for the Advancement of Technology of the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea and by the Ministry of Education (grant no. NRF-2014R1A1A2059237).
References
Liotta LA, Mandler R, Murano G, Katz DA, Gordon RK, Chiang PK and Schiffmann E: Tumor cell autocrine motility factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 83:pp. 3302–3306. 1986; View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gurney ME, Apatoff BR, Spear GT, Baumel MJ, Antel JP, Bania MB and Reder AT: Neuroleukin: A lymphokine product of lectin-stimulated T cells. Science. 234:574–581. 1986. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xu W, Seiter K, Feldman E, Ahmed T and Chiao JW: The differentiation and maturation mediator for human myeloid leukemia cells shares homology with neuroleukin or phosphoglucose isomerase. Blood. 87:4502–4506. 1996.PubMed/NCBI | |
Cao MJ, Osatomi K, Matsuda R, Ohkubo M, Hara K and Ishihara T: Purification of a novel serine proteinase inhibitor from the skeletal muscle of white croaker (Argyrosomus argentatus). Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 272:485–489. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yakirevich E and Naot Y: Cloning of a glucose phosphate isomerase/neuroleukin-like sperm antigen involved in sperm agglutination. Biol Reprod. 62:1016–1023. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gomm SA, Keevil BG, Thatcher N, Hasleton PS and Swindell RS: The value of tumour markers in lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 58:797–804. 1988. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Baumann M, Kappl A, Lang T, Brand K, Siegfried W and Paterok E: The diagnostic validity of the serum tumor marker phosphohexose isomerase (PHI) in patients with gastrointestinal, kidney, and breast cancer. Cancer Invest. 8:351–356. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tsutsumi S, Yanagawa T, Shimura T, Fukumori T, Hogan V, Kuwano H and Raz A: Regulation of cell proliferation by autocrine motility factor/phosphoglucose isomerase signaling. J Biol Chem. 278:32165–32172. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tsutsumi S, Hogan V, Nabi IR and Raz A: Overexpression of the autocrine motility factor/phosphoglucose isomerase induces transformation and survival of NIH-3T3 fibroblasts. Cancer Res. 63:242–249. 2003.PubMed/NCBI | |
Haga A, Funasaka T, Deyashiki Y and Raz A: Autocrine motility factor stimulates the invasiveness of malignant cells as well as up-regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-3 expression via a MAPK pathway. FEBS Lett. 582:1877–1882. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tsutsumi S, Yanagawa T, Shimura T, Kuwano H and Raz A: Autocrine motility factor signaling enhances pancreatic cancer metastasis. Clin Cancer Res. 10:7775–7784. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Funasaka T, Haga A, Raz A and Nagase H: Tumor autocrine motility factor is an angiogenic factor that stimulates endothelial cell motility. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 285:118–128. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Silletti S, Watanabe H, Hogan V, Nabi IR and Raz A: Purification of B16-F1 melanoma autocrine motility factor and its receptor. Cancer Res. 51:3507–3511. 1991.PubMed/NCBI | |
Kanbe K, Chigira M and Watanabe H: Effects of protein kinase inhibitors on the cell motility stimulated by autocrine motility factor. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1222:395–399. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tsutsumi S, Gupta SK, Hogan V, Collard JG and Raz A: Activation of small GTPase Rho is required for autocrine motility factor signaling. Cancer Res. 62:4484–4490. 2002.PubMed/NCBI | |
Chiu CG, St-Pierre P, Nabi IR and Wiseman SM: Autocrine motility factor receptor: A clinical review. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 8:207–217. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kho DH, Zhang T, Balan V, Wang Y, Ha SW, Xie Y and Raz A: Autocrine motility factor modulates EGF-mediated invasion signaling. Cancer Res. 74:2229–2237. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Funasaka T, Hu H, Yanagawa T, Hogan V and Raz A: Down-regulation of phosphoglucose isomerase/autocrine motility factor results in mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition of human lung fibrosarcoma cells. Cancer Res. 67:4236–4243. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Niinaka Y, Harada K, Fujimuro M, Oda M, Haga A, Hosoki M, Uzawa N, Arai N, Yamaguchi S, Yamashiro M and Raz A: Silencing of autocrine motility factor induces mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition and suppression of osteosarcoma pulmonary metastasis. Cancer Res. 70:9483–9493. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li Y, Che Q, Bian Y, Zhou Q, Jiang F, Tong H, Ke J, Wang K and Wan XP: Autocrine motility factor promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition in endometrial cancer via MAPK signaling pathway. Int J Oncol. 47:1017–1024. 2015.PubMed/NCBI | |
Papaetis GS and Syrigos KN: Sunitinib: A multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor in the era of molecular cancer therapies. BioDrugs. 23:377–389. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ciardiello F, de Vita F, Orditura M, Comunale D and Galizia G: Cetuximab in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Future Oncol. 1:173–181. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hitt R, Martin P and Hidalgo M: Cetuximab in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Future Oncol. 2:449–457. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Iqbal N and Iqbal N: Imatinib: A breakthrough of targeted therapy in cancer. Chemother Res Pract. 2014:3570272014.PubMed/NCBI | |
Braghiroli MI, Sabbaga J and Hoff PM: Bevacizumab: Overview of the literature. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 12:567–580. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Holohan C, van Schaeybroeck S, Longley DB and Johnston PG: Cancer drug resistance: An evolving paradigm. Nat Rev Cancer. 13:714–726. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Takanami I, Takeuchi K, Watanabe H, Yanagawa T, Takagishi K and Raz A: Significance of autocrine motility factor receptor gene expression as a prognostic factor in non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Cancer. 95:384–387. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ohta Y, Tanaka Y, Hara T, Oda M, Watanabe S, Shimizu J and Watanabe Y: Clinicopathological and biological assessment of lung cancers with pleural dissemination. Ann Thorac Surg. 69:1025–1029. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Funasaka T and Raz A: The role of autocrine motility factor in tumor and tumor microenvironment. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 26:725–735. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nabi IR, Watanabe H and Raz A: Identification of B16-F1 melanoma autocrine motility-like factor receptor. Cancer research. 50:409–414. 1990.PubMed/NCBI | |
Bang YJ, van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung HC, Shen L, Sawaki A, Lordick F, Ohtsu A, Omuro Y, Satoh T, et al: Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): A phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 376:687–697. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kho DH, Nangia-Makker P, Balan V, Hogan V, Tait L, Wang Y and Raz A: Autocrine motility factor promotes HER2 cleavage and signaling in breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 73:1411–1419. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |