Effect of thymoquinone on head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells in vitro: Synergism with radiation

Introduction

Cancer, being one of the most common causes of mortality worldwide, remains as one of the great challenges of modern medicine. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the sixth most common cancer type in the world, with >600,000 mortalities every year (1,2). Survival rates have not increased in the last few decades. Furthermore, significant side effects of current therapeutic strategies, including surgery and chemoradiotherapy, persist as important factors creating dissatisfaction with the treatment (3). Rare but life-threatening complications, such as vascular erosion after radiotherapy, have been described (4). However, in cases of advanced disease, even combined treatment modalities deliver unsatisfactory results (5). Therefore, novel therapeutic substances that enhance the known effects of established therapies while reducing the undesirable side effects are required.

Thymoquinone (TQ) is a phytochemical compound derived from black cumin, Nigella sativa, a plant belonging to the Ranunculaceae family of flowering plants. Extensive research has been performed in vitro and in vivo proving it to exert anti-neoplastic, anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, hypoglycemic, antihypertensive, antimicrobial, anti-parasitic and antioxidant effects (6).

The antitumor effects of TQ have been investigated in tumor xenograft mice models for colon, prostate, pancreatic and lung cancer (7). Anti-tumor activity was mediated through induction of apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, generation of reactive oxygen species and anti-metastasis/anti-angiogenesis. Involved molecular targets include cellular tumor antigen p53, tumor protein p73, phosphatase and tensin homolog, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ and the activation of caspases (8). Together with these promising antitumor effects, TQ has been reported to be safe in acute and chronic toxicity studies on laboratory animals, particularly when administered orally (1,2,9).

In view of these findings and in the search for novel treatment methods against head and neck cancer, the present study was conducted. The aim of the study was to examine the effect of TQ in two HNSCC lines, SCC25 and CAL27, and to investigate whether TQ would exhibit a synergistic effect with cisplatin and/or radiation in vitro. Proliferation and clonogenic assays were performed, and apoptosis was measured by flow cytometry. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to analyze the effects of TQ in combination with cisplatin and radiation on HNSCC cell lines.

Materials and methods

Study drug

TQ was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Vienna, Austria), dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) at 80 mM stock solution and stored at −20°C. Cisplatin was obtained from a ready-to-use infusion (Accord Healthcare Ltd., North Harrow, UK).

Cell culture

The HNSCC SCC25 cell line was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). The HNSCC CAL27 cell line was obtained from the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany). Tumor cells were cultured as previously described (10). In brief, the cells were grown in RPMI medium (Cambrex, Walkersville, MD, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (PAA Laboratories, Linz, Austria) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco BRL, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2.

Cell viability assays

A Cell Counting kit-8 (CCK-8) cell viability assay (Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) was used to determine the cytotoxic effects of TQ on the tumor cells in vitro. The cells were seeded at 3×103 cells per well into 96-well plates and incubated for 24 h. Next, the cells were treated with increasing concentrations of TQ alone (0–80 µM) and/or in combination with increasing concentrations of cisplatin (0–32 µM). Aliquots of DMSO served as a control. Subsequent to 72 h of incubation, cell proliferation was measured by CCK-8 according to the manufacturer's protocols. Experiments were completed at least three times independently and were performed in triplicates.

Analysis of combination effects

To assess the possible synergistic effects of TQ with cisplatin, the cells were treated with increasing combinations of the two agents (0–40 µM TQ and 0–32 µM cisplatin). Dose response curves were generated and interactions were calculated with CalcuSyn® software (Version 2.0; Biosoft, Cambridge, UK) based on the Chou-Talalay equation (11).

Irradiation

The cells were irradiated using a 150-kV X-ray machine (Gulmay D3300; Gulmay Medical Ltd., Byfleet, UK) at a dose rate of 2 Gy/min at room temperature. The field size was 20×20 cm and the focus-object distance was 52 cm. For dosimetry measurements, thermoluminescence dosimeters were used.

Clonogenic assays

Clonogenic assays were performed as previously described (12). Briefly, 3–15×102 cells were seeded into 6-well plates and allowed to settle for 24 h. Afterwards, the cells were exposed to 5–20 µM TQ and/or irradiated with 2, 4, 6 or 8 Gy. After 72 h, drug-containing medium was replaced by drug-free medium. After a further 10 days, the cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline, fixed with methanol and stained with methylene blue. Colonies with >50 cells were regarded as survivors and counted.

Flow cytometry analysis

A total of 1×105 cells were seeded in 6-well plates. After 24 h, the cells were treated with increased doses of TQ (SCC25 with 0, 40 and 60 µM; and CAL27 with 0, 20 and 40 µM). Cells treated with 40 µM cisplatin served as a positive control. Apoptosis was measured after 48 h using the Annexin-V Apoptosis Detection kit (Bender MedSystems, Vienna, Austria). Apoptosis was defined as Annexin V+/propidium iodide (PI)-. Annexin V-/PI+ and Annexin V+/PI+ results defined necrotic cells.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis for the cell viability assays and flow cytometry experiments was performed using SPSS® Version 21 software (IBM® SPSS, Armonk, NY, USA) and Graph Pad 5.0 software (PRISM®; GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). For the evaluation of clonogenic survival, a linear-quadratic model was used according to the protocol by Franken et al (13). All experiments were repeated at least three times. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM) and P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Effect of TQ on cell proliferation

The cytotoxic effect of TQ was examined in the HNSCC SCC25 and CAL27 cell lines. The cells were treated with TQ in a dose ranging from 0 to 80 µM. TQ displayed dose-dependent growth inhibition in the two tested cell lines. The maximal cytotoxic effect after treatment with TQ was found at 80 and 40 µM in the SCC25 and CAL27 cell lines, respectively. Dose-response curves after 72 h of treatment are shown in Fig. 1. The half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values for TQ ranged from 12.12 µM (CAL27) to 24.62 µM (SCC25), with SEMs between 1.07 µM (CAL27) and 1.10 µM (SCC25).

Figure 1. Dose-response curves of SCC25 and CAL27 cells following treatment with increasing doses of thymoquinone (TQ) and 72 h of incubation.

Combined effect of TQ and cisplatin on cell proliferation

The combined effect of TQ and cisplatin was investigated. The cells were first treated with medium containing a fixed ratio (1:1.25) of concentrations of TQ (0–40 µM) and cisplatin (0–32 µM). A possible synergistic effect was calculated with CalcuSyn® software (Version 2.0, Biosoft, GB). Combination index (CI)=1 indicates an additive effect, CI<1 indicates a synergistic effect and CI>1 indicates antagonism. In the two cell lines, a synergistic effect could not be demonstrated (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. Combination index (CI) plot for the combination of thymoquinone and cisplatin. CI values where calculated by CalcuSyn® software. CI=1 indicates an additive effect, CI<1 indicates a synergistic effect and CI>1 indicates antagonism.

Combined effect of TQ and radiation on clonogenic survival

To determine the long-term effect of treatment with radiation clonogenic assays were performed. The cells were treated with TQ (SCC25 with 0, 10, or 20 µM; and CAL27 with 0, 5 or 10 µM) and then irradiated with 0, 2, 4, 6 or 8 Gy. In the two tested cell lines, treatment with TQ and/or radiation led to reduced clonogenic survival. Combined treatment resulted in a synergistic inhibition of colony formation (Fig. 3; Table I).

Figure 3. Clonogenic survival of cells treated with thymoquinone (TQ) alone and in combination with radiation. The cells were treated with TQ (SCC25 with 0, 10 or 20 µM; and CAL27 with 0, 5 or 10 µM) and then irradiated with 0, 2, 4, 6 or 8 Gy. Surviving colonies were counted after 10 days and expressed as the surviving fraction.

Table I. α and β values ± 95% CI were estimated using curve fitting with a linear-quadratic model.a

Table I.

α and β values ± 95% CI were estimated using curve fitting with a linear-quadratic model.a

	SCC25		CAL27
Parameter	Value	P-value	Value	P-value
α (Gy-1) ± 95% CI	−0.01321±0.063		−0.2437±0.059
β (Gy-2) ± 95% CI	−0.0085±0.078		−0.0009±0.008
Dose 1 TQ	−1.4239±0.183	0.001	−2.5443±0.292	0.001
Dose 2 TQ	−5.8584±1.296	0.001	−6.5023±1.613	0.001

a To describe the enhancement of irradiation in two different doses (5 and 10 µM in CAL27 cells, or 10 and 20 µM TQ in SCC25 cells), a coefficient was calculated. Three independent experiments were used to calculate the 95% CIs. CI, confidence interval; TQ, thymoquinone.

TQ induces apoptosis in HNSCC

Since treatment with TQ led to the reduced proliferation of cancer cells, flow cytometry measurements were performed to evaluate the induction of apoptosis. The cells were treated with TQ (SCC25 with 0, 40 and 60 µM; and CAL27 with 0, 20 and 40 µM) and incubated for 48 h. The cells treated with 40 µM cisplatin served as a positive control. Treatment with TQ resulted in a distinctly increased rate of apoptosis (Fig. 4).

Figure 4. Evaluation of apoptosis by flow cytometry. The cells were treated with thymoquinone (TQ) (SCC25 with 0, 40 and 60 µM; and CAL27 with 0, 20 and 40 µM). Apoptosis was measured after 48 h by flow cytometry using the Annexin-V Apoptosis Detection kit. *P=0.0021 for SCC25 cells treated with 40 µM TQ + 2 Gy vs. SCC25 cells treated with 2 Gy only, P=0.0640 for CAL27 cells treated with 10 µM TQ vs. control cells and P<0.0001 for CAL27 cells treated with 20 µM TQ vs. control cells.

Discussion

The present study demonstrated for the first time a synergistic effect of TQ in HNSCC cells when combined with radiation. The experiments showed that combined treatment led to a stronger inhibition of long-term proliferation when compared with treatment with only one modality. This was demonstrated with clonogenic assays and can be interpreted as a radiosensitizing effect of TQ. This compound is known as a naturally occurring agent with an anti-proliferative effect in a variety of tumor entities (14). However, little has been published on the combined treatment with irradiation. Velho-Pereira et al examined the combined effect in human breast carcinoma cells (MCF7 and T47D) and demonstrated enhanced radiosensitivity (15). The present results support these findings.

In the present experiments, TQ combined with cisplatin exhibited no anti-proliferative synergism. This was demonstrated with proliferation assays in two HNSCC cell lines. These results differ from previous findings (14,16). Jafri et al (16) combined TQ with cisplatin in lung cancer cell lines (NCI-H460 and NCI-H146) in vitro and in a mouse xenograft model using NCI-H460 in vivo. The study described a synergistic effect of the combination treatment and concluded that TQ and cisplatin appear to be an active therapeutic combination in lung cancer. However, the concentrations of TQ used in the in vitro experiments (80 and 100 µM) were considerably higher than in the present study. At these concentrations, the present cell lines showed nearly no viability even without the addition of cisplatin.

Attoub et al (14) performed in vitro experiments with TQ and/or cisplatin in cells derived from lung (LNM35), liver (HepG2), colon (HT29), melanoma (MDA-MB-435) and breast (MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7) tumors, and demonstrated that TQ synergizes with cisplatin to inhibit cellular viability. Carcinoma cells derived from head and neck tumors were not investigated.

In the present study, TQ as a single agent showed dose-dependent inhibition of cell proliferation with an IC50 ranging from 12.12 to 24.62 µM after 72 h in the CAL27 and SCC25 cell lines, respectively. This indicated that TQ is an effective anti-proliferative substance. These values are consistent with previously reported IC50 values for TQ in various carcinoma cell lines (7,17).

In summary, the present study showed that TQ is an effective phytochemical compound with anti-proliferative and radiosensitizing properties in head and neck cancer cells. Due to its low toxicity, TQ could possibly be used as an adjuvant to radiotherapy in the future.

References