Expression of UCP2 is associated with sensitivity to platinum‑based chemotherapy for ovarian serous carcinoma

  • Authors:
    • Masaru Kawanishi
    • Takeshi Fukuda
    • Masahiro Shimomura
    • Yuta Inoue
    • Takuma Wada
    • Reiko Tasaka
    • Tomoyo Yasui
    • Toshiyuki Sumi
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: April 27, 2018     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8598
  • Pages: 9923-9928
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The standard treatment for ovarian serous carcinoma is maximum debulking surgery and platinum‑based chemotherapy. Despite the high response rate for chemotherapy, the majority of patients will be resistant to first‑line agents and the prognosis for these patients is particularly poor. Currently there are no reliable methods to determine or predict platinum resistance. Uncoupling protein 2 (UCP2) is widely expressed in cancer cells and regulates the production of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS). A reduction in ROS is associated with carcinogenesis and chemoresistance. Downregulation of UCP2 significantly causes increased cell death following chemotherapy. The present study investigated the association between UCP2 expression and platinum sensitivity. The study included 54 patients with ovarian serous carcinoma (FIGO stages III and IV) who were treated at Osaka City University Hospital between January 2005 and December 2012. Patients were divided into a platinum‑sensitive group (n=27) and platinum‑resistant group (n=27) based on the platinum‑free interval, which was calculated from the time of last platinum administration to the time of recurrence. UCP2 expression in human ovarian serous carcinoma cells was inhibited by genipin, and changes in carboplatin sensitivity were examined. The UCP2 weighted score was lower in the platinum‑sensitive group than in the platinum resistant‑group (P=0.005). In addition, patients in the low UCP2 expression group were more sensitive to platinum‑based chemotherapy than those in the high UCP2 expression group (P=0.001). Sensitivity to carboplatin was significantly increased when UCP2 was inhibited in human ovarian serous carcinoma cells in vitro. UCP2 expression may be a predictive marker of the efficacy of platinum‑based chemotherapy for patients with ovarian serous carcinoma.

Introduction

Ovarian serous carcinoma is a common cause of cancer deaths in females worldwide (1,2). Patients are generally diagnosed in an advanced stage of disease and have a high mortality rate (3). The standard treatment is maximum debulking surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy (4). Despite a high response rate for chemotherapy, the majority of patients will be resistant to first-line agents and these patients have a particularly poor prognosis (5). Platinum agents are key drugs in primary chemotherapy for patients with ovarian carcinoma, however, there are no clinical biomarkers that predict platinum sensitivity. At recurrence, the possibility of response to re-treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy depends on the platinum-free interval, which is calculated from the time of last platinum administration to the time of cancer recurrence (6). If the ovarian carcinoma recurs within 6 months from the last platinum administration it is considered to be ‘platinum resistant’, whereas if recurrence occurs more than 6 months after the last platinum administration it is considered to be ‘platinum sensitive’ (7). The sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy is an independent prognostic factor for overall and progression-free survival of patients with ovarian carcinoma (8). It is difficult to predict the sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy before the first recurrence therefore ‘platinum-resistant’ patients are identified retrospectively after recurrence of their cancer or failure to respond to initial platinum-based chemotherapy. Understanding the predictors of response to platinum-based chemotherapy will help us select sensitive patients for chemotherapy and spare resistant patients from the toxicity of platinum-based chemotherapy, and will also allow customization of treatments and clinical stratification of patients with ovarian carcinoma.

Currently, there are no reliable methods to determine or predict platinum sensitivity. To improve the prognosis of platinum-resistant ovarian serous carcinoma, the aim of this study was to find new biomarkers with prognostic and predictive potential and search for new therapeutic targets.

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated by chemotherapeutic agents that are able to evade antioxidant defenses cause cell damage and death (911). Uncoupling proteins (UCPs) are part of the superfamily of mitochondrial anion transporters (12,13). There are five known types of UCP (UPC1 to UPC5) with varied characteristics and different tissue distribution (14). The superoxide from the mitochondrial inner membrane activates UCP2 and UCP3, and it can reduce ROS generation (15). UCP2 is broadly expressed in cancer cells and is able to suppress mitochondrial ROS production, in turn mitigating oxidative stress (16). Loss of UCP2 function can increase the production of ROS, while its overexpression may promote cytoprotection by mitigating oxidative stress (17,18). Additionally, UCP2 advances carcinogenesis and chemoresistance (1921). UCP2 is associated with human colon carcinogenesis (22,23). Mitochondrial uncoupling by UCP2 induces resistance to gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer cells (19) and inhibition of UCP2 with genipin sensitizes cancer cells to chemotherapeutic agents (1921). This evidence suggests that UCP2 is a potential target for cancer treatment with chemotherapeutic agents that promote oxidative stress. The expression of UCP2 and its association with sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy for ovarian serous carcinoma was investigated in this study.

Materials and methods

Patients and samples

The present study included 54 patients with ovarian serous carcinoma (FIGO stages III and IV). All patients were treated at Osaka City University Hospital (Osaka, Japan) from January 2005 to December 2012. Patients were divided into two groups based on recurrence of cancer within 6 months from the last platinum administration. Both groups underwent maximum debulking surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy. In the first group (platinum-sensitive group), disease did not recur within 6 months from the last platinum administration whereas in the second group (platinum resistant group), disease recurred within 6 months. Written informed consent was obtained from each patients prior to surgery. The study proposal was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Osaka City University Hospital (IRB no. 3525).

Immunohistochemical staining

Immunohistochemical analysis was performed to examine UCP2 expression in paraffin-embedded sections using an anti-UCP2 antibody (cat. no. ab116263; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and a Dako LSAB2 Peroxidase kit (cat. no. K0675; Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). The paraffin-embedded sections (4 µm-thick) were de-paraffinized, hydrated, and immersed in 3% hydrogen peroxide for 10 min at room temperature to block endogenous peroxidase activity. For antigen retrieval, sections were immersed in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0) and heated in an autoclave at 110°C for 20 min. Then tissue sections were washed in PBS and incubated overnight at 4°C with a 1:100 dilution of the aforementioned rabbit polyclonal antibody for UCP2. Next, sections were washed in PBS for 15 min and incubated with biotinylated goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (Dako; Agilent Technologies, Inc.) for 10 min. After washed with PBS, sections were incubated with a streptavidin-peroxidase solution and 3,3′-diaminobenzidine was used as the chromogenic reagent. Finally, sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. The specificity of the immunohistochemical reactions was confirmed by omitting the primary antibody.

The immunohistochemical expression of UCP2 were assessed quantitatively according to the weighted score method of Sinicrope et al (24). Staining intensity was categorized into three classes: 1+, weak; 2+, moderate; and 3+, intense. The mean percentage of stained tumor cells was classified as follows: 0, ≤5%; 1, 5< and <25%; 2, 25< and <50%; 3, 50< and <75%; 4, >75%. The weighted score was determined by multiplying the score of staining intensity for each tissue specimen by that of percentage of stained tumor cells.

Cell culture

The human ovarian serous carcinoma cell line OVSAHO (no. JCRB1046; National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Osaka, Japan) was cultured in RPMI medium (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Cells were cultured in a humidified 5% CO2 atomosphere and at 37°C.

Chemosensitivity assay

The sensitivity of cells to carboplatin was examined using a Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8; Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Inc., Kumamoto, Japan). Cells were collected and seeded into a 96-well tissue culture plate at a density of approximately 2×103 cells/ml. After 24 h the culture medium was replaced with 100 µl of fresh medium per well and 10 µl dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) alone or containing 50 µM genipin (cat. no. G-4796; Sigma Aldrich, Missouri, USA) was added to each well. Cells were then treated with carboplatin (10–1,000 µM) for 24 h. At the end of treatment 10 µl CCK-8 was added and the plates were incubated for 2 h before measurement of the absorbance at 450 nm with a microplate reader (Corona Electric Co., Ltd., Ibaraki, Japan). Dose-response graphs were constructed as the percentage of viable cells compared with the control cells.

RNA extraction and reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction

Total RNA was extracted from the human ovarian serous carcinoma cell line OVSAHO using a RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) and reverse transcribed into cDNA using a High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Gene expression of UCP2 was determined using a TaqMan Gene Expression Assay (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) in the Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System. For quantification, gene expression was normalized to that of GAPDH.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 21.0 (IBM SPSS, Armonk, NY, USA). Data are presented as the mean ± standard error in Figures and as the mean ± standard deviation in Tables. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analyses were performed to assess prognosis. Mann-Whitney U test was performed to compare the weighted scores. The differences between the means of two groups were assessed using Student's t-test, and associations of the categorical variables in two groups were assessed using χ2 tests. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Patient characteristics

A total of 54 patients with ovarian serous carcinoma were divided into the platinum-sensitive group (n=27) and the platinum-resistant group (n=27). Table I shows age, FIGO stage, tumor marker, and post-surgery observations for the study patients. There were no significant differences in these parameters between the two groups other than postoperative residual disease.

Table I.

Characteristics of patients in the platinum-sensitive and -resistant groups.

Table I.

Characteristics of patients in the platinum-sensitive and -resistant groups.

CharacteristicsPlatinum sensitive (n)Platinum resistant (n)P-value
No. of patients2727
Age (years) 0.725a
  Mean ± SD61.0±12.260.0±10.0
FIGO stage 0.277b
  IIIA  1  0
  IIIB  3  1
  IIIC2119
  IVA  1  4
  IVB  1  3
Tumor marker 0.374a
  CA125, U/ml (mean)3,343.32,180.1
Postoperative residual disease 0.004b
  None  5  0
  <1 cm10  4
  >1 cm1223

a Student's t-test.

b χ2 test. FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; SD, standard deviation.

UCP2 expression in ovarian serous carcinoma tissue

Cytoplasmic expression of UCP2 was observed in tumor cells (Fig. 1). Table II shows the UCP2 weighted scores in tissues of the two patient groups. The mean weighted score for UCP2 expression was significantly lower in the platinum-sensitive group compared with the platinum-resistant group (5.1 and 7.9, respectively, P=0.005; Table II and Fig. 2).

Table II.

Weighted scores for uncoupling protein 2 expression in the platinum-sensitive and -resistant groups.

Table II.

Weighted scores for uncoupling protein 2 expression in the platinum-sensitive and -resistant groups.

No. of patients

Weighted scorePlatinum sensitivePlatinum resistant
  0  2  1
  1  5  1
  2  3  1
  3  1  0
  4  1  2
  6  7  2
  8  412
  9  1  1
12  3  7
Total2727
Mean   5.1   7.9

In continuation, cases were classified into two groups according to their UCP2 expression levels: the low UCP2 expression group (weighted score, 0–6) and the high UCP2 expression group (weighted score, 8–12). Table III shows the characteristics of the high and low expression groups, with analyses revealing no significant differences between the two groups other than postoperative residual disease.

Table III.

Characteristics of patients in the low and high UCP2 expression groups.

Table III.

Characteristics of patients in the low and high UCP2 expression groups.

No. of patients

CharacteristicsLow UCP2 expression (score ≤6)High UCP2 expression (score ≥8)P-value
No. of patients2628
Age (years) 0.610a
  Mean ± SD61.3±11.159.8±11.2
FIGO stage 0.694b
  IIIA  0  1
  IIIB  3  1
  IIIC1921
  IVA  2  3
  IVB  2  2
Tumor marker 0.566a
  CA125, U/ml (mean)3,156.72,395.0
Tumor size (mm) 0.144a
  Mean ± SD46.9±17.253.7±14.9
Postoperative residual disease 0.005b
  None  2  3
  <1 cm12  2
  >1 cm1223

a Student's t-test.

b χ2 test. UCP2, uncoupling protein 2; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Correlation of platinum sensitivity with UCP2 expression

Within the low UCP2 expression group, 19 cases (73.1%) belonged to the platinum-sensitive group while 7 (26.9%) belonged to the platinum-resistant group. In the high UCP2 expression group, 8 cases (28.6%) belonged to the platinum-sensitive group and 20 (71.4%) belonged to the platinum-resistant group. The low UCP2 expression group was significantly more sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy than the high UCP2 expression group (P=0.001; Table IV).

Table IV.

Number of patients with low and high uncoupling protein 2 expression in the platinum-sensitive and -resistant groups.

Table IV.

Number of patients with low and high uncoupling protein 2 expression in the platinum-sensitive and -resistant groups.

UCP2 expressionPlatinum sensitive, number (%)Platinum resistant, number (%)P-value
Low expression (score ≤6)19 (73.1)7 (26.9)0.001a
High expression (score ≥8)8 (28.6)20 (71.4)

a χ2 test

Survival

The low UCP2 expression group showed significantly better overall survival compared with the high UCP2 expression group (P=0.006; Fig. 3).

Inhibition of UCP2 by genipin enhances the sensitivity of ovarian carcinoma cells to carboplatin

Expression of UCP2 mRNA in the ovarian serous carcinoma cell line OVSAHO was confirmed by real-time PCR. UCP2 expression in OVSAHO cells was suppressed following 24 h of incubation with 10 or 50 µM genipin (Fig. 4). Then, we examined whether the sensitivity of ovarian serous carcinoma cells to carboplatin was affected by treatment with genipin. Genipin-mediated inhibition of UCP2 expression in OVSAHO cells significantly enhanced their sensitivity to carboplatin (Fig. 5).

Discussion

UCP2 is widely expressed in cancer cells, and the expression of UCP2 is linked with ROS levels in various types of tissue (19,20). ROS production in cancer cells is inhibited through the expression of UCP2; therefore, high expression of UCP2 can protect cells from oxidative stresses and cell damage (22,23). UCP2 enhances both chemoresistance and carcinogenesis, and downregulation of UCP2 leads to increased cell death due to chemotherapy (25,26).

This study shows a significant correlation between UCP2 expression and platinum sensitivity in patients with ovarian serous carcinoma. Patients with low UCP2 expression tended to be sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy, and low UCP2 expression group showed significantly longer overall survival time than the high UCP2 expression group.

The present study demonstrated that the proliferation of OVSAHO cells was attenuated by the addition of genipin following administration of platinum agent. This is consistent with former reports using other cancer cells (19,25,26). Moreover, these findings indicate that genipin can sensitize cancer cells to chemotherapeutic agents. The clinical application of genipin as a potential drug-sensitizing agent warrants further study.

These results suggest that UCP2 expression levels in patients with ovarian serous carcinoma are associated with the effectiveness of platinum-based chemotherapy. Therefore, UCP2 stands for a potential predictive marker of whether platinum based chemotherapy is likely to be effective in patients with ovarian serous carcinoma. Understanding the predictors of response to platinum-based chemotherapy can help us select patients sensitive to chemotherapy while sparing resistant patients from unnecessary toxicity of platinum-based chemotherapy, and also allows customization of treatments and clinical stratification of patients with ovarian cancer.

In summary, UCP2 expression may be a predictive marker of the efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with ovarian serous carcinoma. The present study is the first to demonstrate a correlation between UCP2 expression and platinum sensitivity. This knowledge can be great help to improve the prognosis of patients with ovarian serous carcinoma. We are planning further investigation regarding molecular mechanism.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr Mary Derry for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E and Forman D: Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 61:69–90. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Borley J, Wilhelm-Benartzi C, Brown R and Ghaem-Maghami S: Does tumour biology determine surgical success in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer? A systematic literature review. Br J Cancer. 107:1069–1074. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

du Bois A, Quinn M, Thigpen T, Vermorken J, Avall-Lundqvist E, Bookman M, Bowtell D, Brady M, Casado A, Cervantes A, et al: 2004 consensus statements on the management of ovarian cancer: Final document of the 3rd international gynecologic cancer intergroup ovarian cancer consensus conference (GCIG OCCC 2004). Ann Oncol. 16:VII7–VI12. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Japan society of gynecologic oncology: Formulation committee of the treatment guidelines for ovarian. https://jsgo.or.jp/guideline/ransou2015.htmlSeptember 1–2017

5 

Ozols RF, Bundy BN, Greer BE, Fowler JM, Clarke-Pearson D, Burger RA, Mannel RS, DeGeest K, Hartenbach EM and Baergen R: Gynecologic Oncology Group: Phase III trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel compared with cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with optimally resected stage III ovarian cancer: A gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol. 21:3194–3200. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Friedlander M, Trimble E, Tinker A, Alberts D, Avall-Lundqvist E, Brady M, Harter P, Pignata S, Pujade-Lauraine E, Sehouli J, et al: Int J Gynecol Cancer. 21:771–775. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Markman M, Rothman R, Hakes T, Reichman B, Hoskins W, Rubin S, Jones W, Almadrones L and Lewis JL Jr: J Clin Oncol. 9:389–393. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Kyrgiou M, Salanti G, Pavlidis N, Paraskevaidis E and Ioannidis JP: Survival benefits with diverse chemotherapy regimens for ovarian cancer: Meta-analysis of multiple treatments. J Natl Cancer Inst. 98:1655–1663. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Pelicano H, Carney D and Huang P: ROS stress in cancer cells and therapeutic implications. Drug Resist Updat. 7:97–110. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Alexandre J, Batteux F, Nicco C, Chéreau C, Laurent A, Guillevin L, Weill B and Goldwasser F: Accumulation of hydrogen peroxide is an early and crucial step for paclitaxel-induced cancer cell death both in vitro and in vivo. Int J Cancer. 119:41–48. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Fruehauf J and Meyskens FL Jr: Reactive oxygen species: A breath of life or death? Clin Cancer Res. 13:789–794. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Boss O, Muzzin P and Giacobino JP: The uncoupling proteins, a review. Eur J Endocrinol. 139:1–9. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Fleury C and Sanchis D: The mitochondrial uncoupling protein-2: Current status. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 31:1261–1278. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Baffy G: Uncoupling protein-2 and cancer. Mitochondrion. 10:243–252. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Echtay KS, Murphy MP, Smith RA, Talbot DA and Brand MD: Superoxide activates mitochondrial uncoupling protein 2 from the matrix side. Studies using targeted antioxidants. J Biol Chem. 277:47129–47135. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Duval C, Nègre-Salvayre A, Dogilo A, Salvayre R, Pénicaud L and Casteilla L: Increased reactive oxygen species production with antisense oligonucleotides directed against uncoupling protein 2 in murine endothelial cells. Biochem Cell Biol. 80:757–764. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Mattiasson G, Shamloo M, Gido G, Mathi K, Tomasevic G, Yi S, Warden CH, Castilho RF, Melcher T, Gonzalez-Zulueta M, et al: Uncoupling protein-2 prevents neuronal death and diminishes brain dysfunction after stroke and brain trauma. Nat Med. 9:1062–1068. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Teshima Y, Akao M, Jones SP and Marban E: Uncoupling protein-2 overexpression inhibits mitochondrial death pathway in cardiomyocytes. Circ Res. 93:192–200. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Horimoto M, Resnick MB, Konkin TA, Routhier J, Wands JR and Baffy G: Expression of uncoupling protein-2 in human colon cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 10:6203–6207. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Carretero MV, Torres L, Latasa U, Garcia-Trevijano ER, Prieto J, Mato JM and Avila MA: Transformed but not normal hepatocytes express UCP2. FEBS Lett. 439:55–58. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Imai K, Fukuda T, Wada T, Kawanishi M, Tasaka R, Yasui T and Sumi T: UCP2 expression may represent a predictive marker of neoadjuvant chemotherapy effectiveness for locally advanced uterine cervical cancer. Oncol Lett. 14:951–957. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Derdák Z, Fülöp P, Sabo E, Tavares R, Berthiaume EP, Resnick MB, Paragh G, Wands JR and Baffy G: Enhanced colon tumor induction in uncoupling protein-2 deficient mice is associated with NF-kappaB activation and oxidative stress. Carcinogenesis. 27:956–961. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Collins P, Jones C, Choudhury S, Damelin L and Hodgson H: Increased expression of uncoupling protein 2 in HepG2 cells attenuates oxidative damage and apoptosis. Liver Int. 25:880–887. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Sinicrope FA, Ruan SB, Cleary KR, Stephens LC, Lee JJ and Levin B: Bcl-2 and p53 oncoprotein expression during colorectal tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 55:237–241. 1995.PubMed/NCBI

25 

Pozza Dalla E, Fiorini C, Dando I, Menegazzi M, Sgarbossa A, Costanzo C, Palmieri M and Donadelli M: Role of mitochondrial uncoupling protein 2 in cancer cell resistance to gemcitabine. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1823:1856–1863. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Mailloux RJ, Adjeitey CN and Harper ME: Genipin-induced inhibition of uncoupling protein-2 sensitizes drug-resistant cancer cells to cytotoxic agents. PLoS One. 5:e132892010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

June-2018
Volume 15 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Kawanishi M, Fukuda T, Shimomura M, Inoue Y, Wada T, Tasaka R, Yasui T and Sumi T: Expression of UCP2 is associated with sensitivity to platinum‑based chemotherapy for ovarian serous carcinoma. Oncol Lett 15: 9923-9928, 2018
APA
Kawanishi, M., Fukuda, T., Shimomura, M., Inoue, Y., Wada, T., Tasaka, R. ... Sumi, T. (2018). Expression of UCP2 is associated with sensitivity to platinum‑based chemotherapy for ovarian serous carcinoma. Oncology Letters, 15, 9923-9928. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8598
MLA
Kawanishi, M., Fukuda, T., Shimomura, M., Inoue, Y., Wada, T., Tasaka, R., Yasui, T., Sumi, T."Expression of UCP2 is associated with sensitivity to platinum‑based chemotherapy for ovarian serous carcinoma". Oncology Letters 15.6 (2018): 9923-9928.
Chicago
Kawanishi, M., Fukuda, T., Shimomura, M., Inoue, Y., Wada, T., Tasaka, R., Yasui, T., Sumi, T."Expression of UCP2 is associated with sensitivity to platinum‑based chemotherapy for ovarian serous carcinoma". Oncology Letters 15, no. 6 (2018): 9923-9928. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8598