|
1
|
Tabár L and Dean PB: Teaching atlas of
mammography. Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd.
116:1–222. 2001.
|
|
2
|
Craft M, Bicknell AM, Hazan GJ and Flegg
KM: Microcalcifications detected as an abnormality on screening
mammography: Outcomes and followup over a five-year period. Int J
Breast Cancer. 2013:4585402013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3
|
Bent CK, Bassett LW, D'Orsi CJ and Sayre
JW: The positive predictive value of BI-RADS microcalcification
descriptors and final assessment categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol.
194:1378–1383. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4
|
Lazarus E, Mainiero MB, Schepps B,
Koelliker SL and Livingston LS: BI-RADS lexicon for US and
mammography: Interobserver variability and positive predictive
value. Radiology. 239:385–391. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
Naseem M, Murray J, Hilton JF,
Karamchandani J, Muradali D, Faragalla H, Polenz C, Han D, Bell DC
and Brezden-Masley C: Mammographic microcalcifications and breast
cancer tumorigenesis: A radiologic-pathologic analysis. BMC Cancer.
15:3072015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6
|
Evans A, Pinder S, Wilson R, Sibbering M,
Poller D, Elston C and Ellis I: Ductal carcinoma in situ of the
breast: Correlation between mammographic and pathologic findings.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 162:1307–1311. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
7
|
Bassett LW: Mammographic analysis of
calcifications. Radiol Clin North Am. 30:93–105. 1992.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
8
|
Fondrinier E, Lorimier G, Guerin-Boblet V,
Bertrand AF, Mayras C and Dauver N: Breast microcalcifications:
Multivariate analysis of radiologic and clinical factors for
carcinoma. World J Surg. 26:290–296. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
9
|
Sick A: Mammographic detestability of
breast microcalcifications. AJR. 1399:231–236. 1982.
|
|
10
|
Barman I, Dingari NC, Saha A, McGee S,
Galindo LH, Liu W, Plecha D, Klein N, Dasari RR and Fitzmaurice M:
Application of Raman spectroscopy to indentify microcalcifications
and underlying breast lesions at stereotactic core needle biopsy.
Cancer Res. 73:3206–3215. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
11
|
Ohsumi S, Taira N, Takabatake D, Takashima
S, Hara F, Takahashi M, Kiyoto S, Aogi K and Nishimura R: Breast
biopsy for mammographically detected nonpalpable lesions using a
vacuum-assisted biopsy device (Mammotome) and upright-type
stereotactic mammography unit without a digital imaging system:
Experience of 500 biopsies. Breast Cancer. 21:123–127. 2014.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
12
|
Fusco R, Petrillo A, Catalano O, Sansone
M, Granata V, Filice S, D'Aiuto M, Pankhurst Q and Douek M:
Procedures for location of non-palpable breast lesions: A
systematic review for the radiologist. Breast Cancer. 21:522–531.
2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
13
|
Dodd G, Fry K and Delany W: Pre-operative
localization of occult carcinoma of the breast. Management of the
patient with cancer. Nealon TF: Saunders; Philadelphia, PA; pp.
88–113. 1965
|
|
14
|
Frank HA, Hall FM and Steer ML:
Preoperative localization of nonpalpable breast lesions
demonstrated by mammography. N Engl J Med. 295:259–260. 1976.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
15
|
Burkholder HC, Witherspoon LE, Burns RP,
Horn JS and Biderman MD: Breast surgery techniques: Preoperative
bracketing wire localization by surgeons. Am Surg. 73:574–578.
2007.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
16
|
Kouskos E, Gui GP, Mantas D, Revenas K,
Rallis N, Antonopoulou Z, Lampadariou E, Gogas H and Markopoulos C:
Wire localisation biopsy of non-palpable breast lesions: Reasons
for unsuccessful excision. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 27:262–266.
2006.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
17
|
Jackman RJ and Marzoni FA Jr:
Needle-localized breast biopsy: Why do we fail? Radiology.
204:677–684. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
Kettritz U, Rotter K, Schreer I, Murauer
M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Peter D and Heywang-Köbrunner SH:
Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 2874 patients: A
multicenter study. Cancer. 100:245–251. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19
|
Agacayak F, Ozturk A, Bozdogan A,
Selamoglu D, Alco G, Ordu C, Pilanci KN, Killi R and Ozmen V:
Stereotactic vacuum-assisted core biopsy results for non-palpable
breast lesions. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 15:5171–5174. 2014.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
20
|
Barranger E, Marpeau O, Chopier J, Antoine
M and Uzan S: Site-select procedure for non-palpable breast
lesions: Feasibility study with a 15-mm cannula. J Surg Oncol.
90:14–19. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
21
|
Park HL and Kim LS: The current role of
vacuum assisted breast biopsy system in breast disease. J Breast
Cancer. 14:1–7. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
22
|
Abbate F, Cassano E, Menna S and Viale G:
Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: Use at the
European institute of oncology in 2010. J Ultrasound. 14:177–181.
2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
23
|
Youn I, Kim MJ, Moon HJ and Kim EK:
Absence of residual microcalcifications in atypical ductal
hyperplasia diagnosed via stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast
biopsy: Is surgical excision obviated? J Breast Cancer. 17:265–269.
2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
24
|
Ocal K, Dag A, Turkmenoglu O, Gunay EC,
Yucel E and Duce MN: Radioguided occult lesion localization versus
wire-guided localization for non-palpable breast lesions:
Randomized controlled trial. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 66:1003–1007.
2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
25
|
Fleming FJ, Hill AD, Mc Dermott EW,
O'Doherty A, O'Higgins NJ and Quinn CM: Intraoperative margin
assessment and re-excision rate in breast conserving surgery. Eur J
Surg Oncol. 30:233–237. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
26
|
Postma EL, Witkamp AJ, van den Bosch MA,
Verkooijen HM and van Hillegersberg R: Localization of nonpalpable
breast lesions. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 11:1295–1302. 2011.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
27
|
Staradub VL, Rademaker AW and Morrow M:
Factors influencing outcomes for breast conservation therapy of
mammographically detected malignancies. J Am Coll Surg.
196:518–524. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
28
|
Medina-Franco H, Abarca-Pérez L,
García-Alvarez MN, Ulloa-Gómez JL, Romero-Trejo C and
Sepúlveda-Méndez J: Radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL)
versus wire-guided lumpectomy for non-palpable breast lesions: A
randomized prospective evaluation. J Surg Oncol. 97:108–111. 2008.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
29
|
Liberman L and Menell JH: Breast imaging
reporting and data system (BI-RADS). Radiol Clin North Am.
40:409–430. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
30
|
Lovrics PJ, Goldsmith CH, Hodgson N,
McCready D, Gohla G, Boylan C, Cornacchi S and Reedijk M: A
multicentered, randomized, controlled trial comparing radioguided
seed localization to standard wire localization for nonpalpable,
invasive and in situ breast carcinomas. Ann Surg Oncol.
18:3407–3414. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
31
|
Rissanen TJ, Mäkäräinen HP, Mattila SI,
Karttunen AI, Kiviniemi HO, Kallioinen MJ and Kaarela OI: Wire
localized biopsy of breast lesions: A review of 425 cases found in
screening or clinical mammography. Clin Radiol. 47:14–22. 1993.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
32
|
Vrieling C, Collette L, Fourquet A,
Hoogenraad WJ, Horiot JH, Jager JJ, Pierart M, Poortmans PM,
Struikmans H, Maat B, et al: The influence of patient, tumor and
treatment factors on the cosmetic results after breast-conserving
therapy in the EORTC ‘boost vs. no boost’ trial. EORTC radiotherapy
and breast cancer cooperative groups. Radiother Oncol. 55:219–232.
2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
33
|
Mariscal Martinez A, Solà M, de Tudela AP,
Julián JF, Fraile M, Vizcaya S and Fernández J: Radioguided
localization of nonpalpable breast cancer lesions: Randomized
comparison with wire localization in patients undergoing
conservative surgery and sentinel node biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol.
193:1001–1009. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
34
|
Rampaul RS, Bagnall M, Burrell H, Pinder
SE, Evans AJ and Macmillan RD: Randomized clinical trial comparing
radioisotope occult lesion localization and wire-guided excision
for biopsy of occult breast lesions. Br J Surg. 91:1575–1577. 2004.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
35
|
Rahusen FD, Bremers AJ, Fabry HF, van
Amerongen AH, Boom RP and Meijer S: Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy of
nonpalpable breast cancer versus wireguided resection: A randomized
clinical trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 9:994–998. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
36
|
Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z and Jemal A: Cancer
statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 64:9–29. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
37
|
Youlden DR, Cramb SM, Dunn NA, Muller JM,
Pyke CM and Baade PD: The descriptive epidemiology of female breast
cancer: An international comparison of screening, incidence,
survival and mortality. Cancer Epidemiol. 36:237–248. 2012.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
38
|
Paap E, Holland R, den Heeten GJ, van
Schoor G, Botterweck AA, Verbeek AL and Broeders MJ: A remarkable
reduction of breast cancer deaths in screened versus unscreened
women: A case-referent study. Cancer Causes Control. 21:1569–1573.
2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
39
|
Tabár L, Vitak B, Chen TH, Yen AM, Cohen
A, Tot T, Chiu SY, Chen SL, Fann JC, Rosell J, et al: Swedish
two-county trial: Impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer
mortality during 3 decades. Radiology. 260:658–663. 2011.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
40
|
Tinnemans JG, Wobbes T, Hendriks JH, van
der Sluis RF, Lubbers EJ and de Boer HH: Localization and excision
of nonpalpable breast lesions. A surgical evaluation of three
methods. Arch Surg. 122:802–806. 1987.
|
|
41
|
Lovrics PJ, Cornacchi SD, Farrokhyar F,
Garnett A, Chen V, Franic S and Simunovic M: The relationship
between surgical factors and margin status after breast
conservation surgery for early stage breast cancer. Am J Surg.
197:740–746. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
42
|
Moon WK, Im JG, Koh YH, Noh DY and Park
IA: US of mammographically detected clustered microcaleifications.
Radiology. 217:849–854. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
43
|
Yu PC, Lee YW, Chou FF, Wu SC, Huang CC,
Ng SH, Sheen-Chen SM and Ko SF: Clustered microcalcifications of
intermediate concern detected on digital mammography: Ultrasound
assessment. Breast. 20:495–500. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
44
|
Boonlikit S: Comparison of mammography in
combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography alone
for breast cancer screening in asymptomatic women. Asian Pac J
Cancer Prev. 14:7731–7736. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
45
|
Köhler J, Krause B, Grunwald S, Thomas A,
Köhler G, Schwesinger G, Schimming A, Jäger B, Paepke S and
Ohlinger R: Ultrasound and mammography guided wire marking of
non-palpable breast lesions: analysis of 741 cases. Ultraschall
Med. 28:283–290. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
46
|
Saarela AO, Rissanen TJ, Lähteenmäki KM,
Soini Y, Haukipuro K, Kaarela O and Kiviniemi HO: Wire-guided
excision of non-palpable breast cancer: Determinants and
correlations between radiologic and histologic margins and residual
disease in re-excisions. Breast. 10:28–34. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
47
|
Sauven P, Bishop H, Patnick J, Walton J,
Wheeler E and Lawrence G; National Health Service Breast Screening
Programme; British Association of Surgical Oncology: The national
health service breast screening programme and British association
of surgical oncology audit of quality assurance in breast screening
1996–2001. Br J Surg. 90:82–87. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
48
|
Blamey RW: The British association of
surgical oncology guidelines for surgeons in the management of
symptomatic breast disease in the UK (1998 revision). BASO Breast
Specialty Group. Eur J Surg Oncol. 24:464–476. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
