Open Access

High expression of programmed cell death protein 1 on peripheral blood T‑cell subsets is associated with poor prognosis in metastatic gastric cancer

  • Authors:
    • Bian Shi
    • Qiujian Li
    • Xuhui Ma
    • Qilong Gao
    • Lu Li
    • Junfeng Chu
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: July 23, 2018     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9190
  • Pages: 4448-4454
  • Copyright: © Shi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Immune checkpoints in solid tumors serve important roles in metastasis. The present study was designed to explore the expression of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD‑1) on peripheral blood T‑cell subsets and its role in the clinicopathological features and prognosis of patients with metastatic gastric cancer. The expression of PD‑1 in peripheral blood T‑cell subsets was detected in 100 metastatic gastric cancer patients prior to the first line chemotherapy by flow cytometric analysis. The potential associaton between the peripheral blood T‑cell subsets PD‑1 level and the clinicopathological features of patients with metastatic gastric cancer and the clinical outcomes was analyzed. The percent of high PD‑1 expressed cluster of differentiation (CD)3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T‑cells was 20.4, 13.0 and 9.4%, respectively in patients with metastatic gastric cancer. The overall survival (OS) and progression‑free survival (PFS) rate of the 100 patients with metastatic gastric cancer was 12.2 and 3.9 months, respectively. Kaplan‑Meier curve with long‑rank analysis indicated that patients with higher PD‑1+/CD3+, PD‑1+/CD3+CD4+ and PD‑1+/CD3+CD8+ levels had a worse prognosis (all P<0.05). Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that high PD‑1+/CD3+ [hazard ratio (HR), 2.145; P=0.015], high PD‑1+/CD3+CD4+ (HR, 1.866; P=0.034) and high PD‑1+/CD3+CD8+ (HR, 1.817; P=0.033) level in peripheral blood were independent risk factors for predicting the survival time of patients with metastatic gastric cancer. High PD‑1+/CD3+, high PD‑1+/CD3+CD4+ and high PD‑1+/CD3+CD8+ expression conferred a lower overall survival rate in patients with metastatic gastric cancer. These results suggest that high PD‑1 expression on peripheral blood T‑cell subsets may potentially be novel prognostic biomarker for metastatic gastric cancer.

Introduction

Gastric cancer is rampant in many countries around the world (1). According to Globocan 2012, gastric cancers rank as the 4th most common malignancy, accounting for more than 6.8% of adult malignancies; and the third leading cause of cancer death worldwide, accounting for more than 8.8% of adult malignancie; especially in China, gastric cancer causing approximately 325,000 deaths per year (2). It's well known that prognosis of gastric cancer remains poor due to the lack of effective therapies in patients with advanced cancer (2,3).

Immunotherapy has become one of the most promising treatments in gastric cancer, especially immunotherapy targeting the immune checkpoints programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand-1 (PD-L1) (4). PD-1, a cluster of differentiation (CD)28 family member, is an immunosuppressive receptor expressed on T cells, B cells, monocytes, natural killer cells (NKs) and many tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) (5,6). Previous studies have shown that high-PD-1/CD4 ratio was associated with poor prognosis in NSCLC patients (7); high proportion of PD-1+CD4+ T cells in the peripheral blood cells of PDAC patients was correlated to chemotherapy resistance (8); high surface expression of PD-1+CD8+ T cells confered worse relapse-free and overall survival (OS) rates in patients with colorectal cancer (9); an overall low PD-1 and a concurrent high CD3+ T cells expression was found in high-risk prostate cancer tissue (10). All these results indicated that the surface expression of PD-1 on T-cells was tightly associated with the prognosis of cancer patients.

Recent studies have confirmed the expression of PD-1 and its relationship with prognosis in gastric cancer patients (11). In this study, we clarify the significance of PD-1 expression on peripheral blood T-cell subsets, then explore the relationships between PD-1 and the clinicopathological features and prognosis of patients with metastatic gastric cancer.

Patients and methods

Patients

A total of 100 outpatients with metastatic gastric cancer met the inclusion criteria from the Zhengzhou University Affiliated Cancer Hospital (Zhengzhou, China) were enrolled in the study between May 2015 and May 2016. The inclusion criteria were listed as follows: i) The diagnosis of metastatic gastric cancer was confirmed by endoscopic biopsy and imageological examination; ii) the disease was classified as pathologic M1 with any T and N stage based on the standard of the WHO Classification of Tumors of the Digestive System, 2010 edition (12,13); iii) 2 ml peripheral blood was drawn before the first line therapy; iv) patients had completed 4 courses of first line chemotherapy as documented in the medical record; and v) complete follow-up data was available. This study was approved by the ethics committee at the Zhengzhou University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, and informed consent form was signed by every patient. The clinical characteristics of these patients were detailed in Table I.

Table I.

Association between PD-1 expression on peripheral blood T-cell subsets and clinicopathological factors in patients with metastatic gastric cancer.

Table I.

Association between PD-1 expression on peripheral blood T-cell subsets and clinicopathological factors in patients with metastatic gastric cancer.

PD-1+/CD3+ PD-1+/ CD3+CD4+ PD-1+/ CD3+CD8+



CharacteristicsCase (n=100)HighLowP-valueHighLowP-valueHighLowP-value
Total10042580.76638620.57444560.151
  Male652837 2639 3233
  Female351421 1223 1223
Age (years) 0.623 0.84 0.824
  ≥60331518 1320 1419
  <60672740 2542 3037
KPS score 0.101 0.096 0.642
  ≥80753540 3243 3441
  <8025718 619 1015
Differentiation 0.06 0.324 0.967
  Well18414 513 810
  Poor823844 3349 3646
Number of metastatic organs 0.463 0.552 0.422
  >2411922 1724 2021
  ≤2592336 2138 2435
Liver metastasis 0.654 0.709 0.627
  Present452025 1827 2124
  Absent552233 2035 2332
Peritoneal metastasis 0.609 0.638 0.594
  Present472126 1928 2225
  Absent532132 1934 2231

[i] PD-1, programmed cell death protein 1; CD, cluster of differentiation; KPS, Karnofsky performance score.

Treatment and response

Oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2 d1, every 3 weeks) combined with Capecitabine (1,000 mg bid d1-14, every 3 weeks) was undergone as the first line chemothrapy. Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated every 2 cylcles of chemotherapy. The follow-up was performed until July 30, 2017. progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated from the date of first treatment to the date of progression or death/censoring. OS was calculated from the date of first treatment to the date of death or censoring. The therapy regimen was replaced when the patient emerged progressive disease.

Preparation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)

Approximately 40 ml of peripheral blood was drawn from the patients on the day before surgery and on the day before the first line therapy. A Ficoll-Paque (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) density gradient was used to centrifuge blood samples.

Flow cytometric analysis

PBMC (1×105) were suspended in PBS supplemented with 20% human AB serum and incubated on ice with appropriate dilution of antibodies for 30 min. All antibodies used in this study including anti-CD3-PE-Cy7, anti-CD4-PerCP-Cy5-5, anti-CD8-APC, anti-CD279 (PD-1)-FITC, were purchased from BioLegend (San Diego, CA, USA). APC mouse IgG1(j) (clone MOPC-21), PE-Cy7 mouse IgG2b(j) (clone MPC-11), PerCP-Cy5-5 mouse IgG1(j) (clone MOPC-21) and FITC mouse IgG2b(j) (clone 27–35; all BioLegend), were used as isotype controls. Additionally, FMO plus isotype controls were used to help us gate the negative and positive populations of CD3, CD4, CD8 and PD-1 (14). Briefly, when we run flowcytometry, we stained all antibodies to observe the expression of CD3, CD4, CD8 and PD-1, however, we also stained CD3, CD4, CD8 and FITC mouse IgG2b as FMO plus isotype control of PD-1 expression. The similar method was used to distinguish the negative and positive populations of CD3, CD4, and CD8. The staining cells were analyzed on BD FACS Canto II with FACS Diva software (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 24.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY USA). Difference between two groups was analyzed by student t-test, and difference between multiple groups was analyzed by one way ananlysis of variance with Tukey's post hoc test. Kaplan-Meier curve with the log rank test was used in survival analysis. Prognostic factors were examined by univariate and multivariate analysis on the basis of Cox proportional hazards model were used for. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Expression of PD-1 on peripheral blood lymphocytes

We detected the surface expression of PD-1 on lymphocytes from the PBMCs of patients with metastatic gastric cancer, and focused on the expression of PD-1 on CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T-cell subsets. The representative staining patterns of PD-1 on these subsets were shown in Fig. 1. For further analysis, we defined that lymphocytes with PD-1+/CD3+ >15%, PD-1+/CD3+CD4+ >10%, or PD-1+/CD3+CD8+ >5% showed high surface PD-1 expression on T-cell subsets by using isotype-matched control, on the contrary PD-1 expression level is low. The percent of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T-cells with high surface PD-1 expression were 20.4, 13.0 and 9.4%, respectively.

Relationship between PD-1 expression on peripheral blood T-cell subsets and clinicopathological factors in metastatic gastric cancer

The correlation between PD-1 expression on peripheral blood T-cell subsets and clinicopathological factors of patients with metastatic gastric cancer was analyzed. However, no correlation was found between PD-1 expression on peripheral blood T-cell subsets and clinicopathological factors of patients with metastatic gastric cancer (all P>0.05) (Table I).

Relationship between PD-1 expression on peripheral blood T-cell subsets and OS in metastatic gastric cancer

The correlation of PD-1 expression on peripheral blood T-cell subsets with the prognosis of patients with metastatic gastric cancer was analyzed. The OS and PFS rate of the 100 patients with metastatic gastric cancer were 12.2 and 3.9 months, respectively (Fig. 2). The 1-year and 2-year OS rates were 53.0 and 2%, respectively.

Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that patients with high PD-1+/CD3+, PD-1+/CD3+CD4+, and PD-1+/CD3+CD8+ level showed worse prognosis compared with patients with low PD-1+/CD3+, PD-1+/CD3+CD4+, and PD-1+/CD3+CD8+ level (all P<0.05) (Fig. 3). Univariate analysis was performed to estimate the clinical significances of various parameters that may affect survival of patients with metastatic gastric cancer. As shown in Table II, Karnofsky performance score (KPS) scores [hazard ratio (HR); 2.059; P=0.043], tumor differentiation (HR, 2.167; P=0.031), number of metastatic organs (HR, 3.041; P=0.032), liver metastasis (HR, 3.234; P=0.047), peritoneal metastasis (HR, 2.567; P=0.038), high PD-1+/CD3+ level (HR, 2.066; P=0.005), high PD-1+/CD3+CD4+ level (HR, 1.857; P=0.028), and high PD-1+/CD3+CD8+ level (HR, 1.796; P=0.023) were all predictive factors for prognosis of patients with metastatic gastric cancer. Then multivariate analysis based on Cox's proportional hazards model was performed to determine the independent prognostic factors for patients with metastatic gastric cancer in our cohort. The results indicated that high PD-1+/CD3+ (HR, 2.145; P=0.015), high PD-1+/CD3+CD4+ (HR, 1.866; P=0.034), and high PD-1+/CD3+CD8+ (HR, 1.817; P=0.033) level were independent risk factors for predicting the survival time of metastatic gastric cancer (Table III).

Table II.

Univariate analysis of clinicopathological factors for overall survival in gastric cancer.

Table II.

Univariate analysis of clinicopathological factors for overall survival in gastric cancer.

ParametersHazard ratio95% confidence intervalP-value
Age (≥60 vs. <60 years)1.8851.024–3.8950.067
Sex (male vs. female)1.6030.876–4.5630.168
KPS score (≥8 vs. <80)2.0591.556–6.3450.043
Differentiation (well vs. poor)2.1671.543–4.3240.031
Number of metastatic organs (<2 vs. ≤2)3.0412.123–7.3420.032
Liver metastasis (present vs. absent)3.2342.246–9.2130.047
Peritoneal metastasis (present vs. absent)2.5671.526–5.5630.038
PD-1+/CD3+ (high vs. low)2.0661.311–3.2570.005
PD-1+/CD3+CD4+ (high vs. low)1.8571.171–2.9460.028
PD-1+/CD3+CD8+ (high vs. low)1.7961.159–2.7840.023

[i] PD-1, programmed cell death protein 1; CD, cluster of differentiation; KPS, Karnofsky performance score.

Table III.

Multivariate analysis of clinicopathological factors for disease special survival in gastric cancer.

Table III.

Multivariate analysis of clinicopathological factors for disease special survival in gastric cancer.

ParametersHazard ratio95% confidence intervalP-value
KPS score (≥8 vs. <80)1.7671.543–6.3240.131
Differentiation (well vs. poor)1.1590.756–4.3450.243
Number of metastatic organs (>2 vs. ≤2)2.0411.123–7.3420.126
Liver metastasis (present vs. absent)2.2892.239–11.2130.147
Peritoneal metastasis (present vs. absent)2.1361.238–8.1750.264
PD-1+/CD3+ (high vs. low)2.1451.325–5.2320.015
PD-1+/CD3+CD4+ (high vs. low)1.8661.273–3.2430.034
PD-1+/CD3+CD8+ (high vs. low)1.8171.099–3.6750.033

[i] PD-1, programmed cell death protein 1; CD, cluster of differentiation; KPS, Karnofsky performance score.

Furthermore, we compared the prognostic value of PD-1 expression on peripheral blood T-cell subsets for OS with that of other independent prognostic factors using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves, which showed that the PD-1+/CD3+ expression was not different from PD-1+/CD3+CD4+ with regards to OS, and the PD-1+/CD3+CD4+ expression was not different from PD-1+/CD3+CD8+ with regards to OS (Fig. 4). Interestingly, when we compared PD-1+/CD3+ with PD-1+/CD3+CD8+, the PD-1+/CD3+CD8+ had a better prognostic value than PD-1+/CD3+ (Fig. 4).

Discussion

Recently, immunotherapy has become a promising treatment for many types of cancers, including gastric cancer, which has given rise to a growing interest in cancer immunotherapy (15). Many clinical trials have demonstrated that anti-PD-1 therapy was a successful treatment for malignancies, including NSCLC, metastatic melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, Hodgkin's lymphoma, and metastatic gastric cancer (1618). It has been indicated that PD-1 and PD-L1 expression were independent prognosis factors in gastric cancer by immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis (1922). Since it is difficult to get fresh specimens from patients to determine the expression of PD-1 or PD-L1 expression by IHC, no uniform standard was defined for PD-L1 positivity up to now. Eto et al defined PD-L1 positivity by staining of the tumor-cell in four grade: 6–25, 26–50 or 51–75 and 76–100% of cells (12,2329); Ti Wen and co-worker defined staining pattern of PD-L1 as positive if <5 or ≥5% in tumor cells (13); whereas Wenfeng Fang assessed the expression of PD-L1 by semi-quantitative H-score and defined cases with greater than 10% PD-L1 expression on tumor cells were considered positive (26). Therefore, consistency detection of PD-1 and PD-L1 expression by IHC is limited due to the difference of antibody qualities from different manufacturers, the interpretative subjectivity, and the different standard on positivity thresholds.

For the development of new treatment modalities, the co-development of novel convenient detection methods of biomarkers is important. Here, we detected PD-1 expression in PBMC from patients with metastatic gastric cancer using flow cytometry analysis, which was an antibody-independent assay for PD-1 protein detection of circulation. To analysis the role of the expression level of PD-1 on peripheral blood T-cell subsets in clinicopathological factors and prognosis of patients with metastatic gastric cancer, we defined that lymphocytes with PD-1+/CD3+ >15%, PD-1+/CD3+CD4+ >10%, or PD-1+/CD3+CD8+ >5% showed high PD-1 expression level on T-cell subsets, on the contrary PD-1 expression level is low. However, our data indicated that there was no significant difference on the expression level of PD-1 on peripheral blood T-cell subsets between patients with high PD-1+/CD3+, PD-1+/CD3+CD4+, PD-1+/CD3+CD8+ expression and patients with low PD-1+/CD3+, PD-1+/CD3+CD4+, PD-1+/CD3+CD8+ expression.

In addition, the expression of PD-1 showed no correlation with clinicopathological factors of patients with metastatic gastric cancer. Then, we analyzed the correlation between PD-1+/CD3+, PD-1+/CD3+CD4+, PD-1+/CD3+CD8+ expression and PFS, the data demonstrated that patients with high PD-1+/CD3+, PD-1+/CD3+CD4+, PD-1+/CD3+CD8+ level showed worse OS. Further multivariate analysis using Cox's proportional hazards model indicated that high PD-1+/CD3+, PD-1+/CD3+CD4+, and PD-1+/CD3+CD8+ were independent risk factors for predicting the survival of metastatic gastric cancer.

Furthermore, ROC analysis suggested that PD-1+/CD3+CD4+ expression has a similar survival predictive ability as PD-1+/CD3 and PD-1+/CD3+CD8+, while PD-1+/CD3+CD8+ higher predictive ability than PD-1+/CD3, implying that identification of PD-1+/CD3+CD8+ in patients might be a more straightforward procedure.

Cumulative studies revealed that PD-L1 was widely expressed in human malignancies and was a component of the immunosuppressive microenvironment (24). A problems that cannot be neglected is that the heterogeneity of fresh specimens and peripheral blood. It was not clear the status of PD-1 expression on peripheral blood accurately reflect the status of PD-1 expression in tumor microenvironment. However, tumor-derived DNA and RNA can be released and circulated in the peripheral circulation of cancer patients, which operationally allowing for non-invasive gene expression profiling by body fluid analysis. Indeed, there is a wealth of information indicating a correlation between tumor-associated changes in genomic, epigenetic, or transcriptional patterns and alterations in the levels of cell-free circulating nucleic acids (cfCNAs) (30,31). Thus, detected PD-L1 in peripheral blood may after all be accepted as a kind of practical methods for prostraction of disease progression. In the other hands, although we did not determined the expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2, two ligands for PD-1, on peripheral blood T-cell subsets in the present study, it has been already demonstrated that PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer cells was significantly correlated with worse prognosis in gastric cancer patients (32). As to PD-L2, which deliver co-inhibitory signal by binding to PD-1, it is very interesting to determine PD-L2 expression on peripheral blood T-cell subsets to see its role on immune evasion in gastric cancer patients.

In conclusion, in our cohort, PD-1 expression on peripheral blood T-cell subsets is an independent prognostic factor in metastatic gastric cancer, suggest that PD-1 expression in peripheral blood T-cell subsets may potential be a novel prognostic marker for gastric cancer patients at advanced stage.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr Weiquan Lu (Department of Cancer Prevention, Henan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China) for his assistance with statistical analysis.

Funding

No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

JC had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. BS performed the clinical analysis, including patient selection, tissue procurement, histology, patient case collection and biostatistics. QL and XM performed the data analysis and interpretation of results. BS and QG performed the experiments and statistical analysis. JC and LL planned and supervised the project, performed data analysis and wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee at Zhengzhou University Affiliated Cancer Hospital (Henan, China) and written informed consent was obtained from each patient.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients for the publication of their data.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Hamamoto Y: Complications in advanced or recurrent gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis during and after palliative systemic chemotherapy. Mol Clin Oncol. 3:539–542. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, Jemal A, Yu XQ and He J: Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 66:115–132. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D and Bray F: Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN, 2012. Int J Cancer. 136:E359–E386. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Price TJ, Shapiro JD, Segelov E, Karapetis CS, Pavlakis N, Van Cutsem E, Shah MA, Kang YK and Tebbutt NC: Management of advanced gastric cancer. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 6:199–209. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Topalian SL, Taube JM, Anders RA and Pardoll DM: Mechanism-driven biomarkers to guide immune checkpoint blockade in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 16:275–287. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Freeman GJ, Long AJ, Iwai Y, Bourque K, Chernova T, Nishimura H, Fitz LJ, Malenkovich N, Okazaki T, Byrne MC, et al: Engagement of the PD-1 immunoinhibitory receptor by a novel B7 family member leads to negative regulation of lymphocyte activation. J Exp Med. 192:1027–1034. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Latchman Y, Wood CR, Chernova T, Chaudhary D, Borde M, Chernova I, Iwai Y, Long AJ, Brown JA, Nunes R, et al: PD-L2 is a second ligand for PD-1 and inhibits T cell activation. Nat Immunol. 2:261–268. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Zheng H, Liu X, Zhang J, Rice SJ, Wagman M, Kong Y, Zhu L, Zhu J, Joshi M and Belani CP: Expression of PD-1 on CD4+ T cells in peripheral blood associates with poor clinical outcome in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget. 7:56233–56240. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Komura T, Sakai Y, Harada K, Kawaguchi K, Takabatake H, Kitagawa H, Wada T, Honda M, Ohta T, Nakanuma Y and Kaneko S: Inflammatory features of pancreatic cancer highlighted by monocytes/macrophages and CD4+ T cells with clinical impact. Cancer Sci. 106:672–686. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Shibutani M, Maeda K, Nagahara H, Fukuoka T, Nakao S, Matsutani S, Hirakawa K and Ohira M: The prognostic significance of the tumor-infiltrating programmed cell death-1+ to CD8+ lymphocyte ratio in patients with colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res. 37:4165–4172. 2017.PubMed/NCBI

11 

Baas W, Gershburg S, Dynda D, Delfino K, Robinson K, Nie D, Yearley JH and Alanee S: Immune characterization of the programmed death receptor pathway in high risk prostate cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 15:577–281. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Yuan J, Zhang J, Zhu Y, Li N, Tian T, Li Y, Li Y, Li Z, Lai Y, Gao J and Shen L: Programmed death-ligand-1 expression in advanced gastric cancer detected with RNA in situ hybridization and its clinical significance. Oncotarget. 7:39671–39679. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Eto S, Yoshikawa K, Nishi M, Higashijima J, Tokunaga T, Nakao T, Kashihara H, Takasu C, Iwata T and Shimada M: Programmed cell death protein 1 expression is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer after curative resection. Gastric Cancer. 19:466–471. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Vali B, Jones RB, Sakhdari A, Sheth PM, Clayton K, Yue FY, Gyenes G, Wong D, Klein MB, Saeed S, et al: HCV-specific T cells in HCV/HIV co-infection show elevated frequencies of dual Tim-3/PD-1 expression that correlate with liver disease progression. Eur J Immunol. 40:2493–2505. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Lauwers GY CF and Graham DY: Curado MP tumours of the stomach. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system Bosman FT CF. Hruban RH and Theise ND: 48–59. 2010.

16 

Aldarouish M and Wang C: Trends and advances in tumor immunology and lung cancer immunotherapy. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 35:1572016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Dougan M and Dranoff G: Immune therapy for cancer. Annu Rev Immunol. 27:83–117. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Sharon E, Streicher H, Goncalves P and Chen HX: Immune checkpoint inhibitors in clinical trials. Chin J Cancer. 33:434–444. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Ansell SM, Lesokhin AM, Borrello I, Halwani A, Scott EC, Gutierrez M, Schuster SJ, Millenson MM, Cattry D, Freeman GJ, et al: PD-1 blockade with nivolumab in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 372:311–319. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Brahmer JR, Hammers H and Lipson EJ: Nivolumab: Targeting PD-1 to bolster antitumor immunity. Future Oncol. 11:1307–1326. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Muro K, Chung HC, Shankaran V, Geva R, Catenacci D, Gupta S, Eder JP, Golan T, Le DT, Burtness B, et al: Pembrolizumab for patients with PD-L1-positive advanced gastric cancer (KEYNOTE-012): A multicentre, open-label, phase 1b trial. Lancet Oncol. 17:717–726. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Rizvi NA, Mazières J, Planchard D, Stinchcombe TE, Dy GK, Antonia SJ, Horn L, Lena H, Minenza E, Mennecier B, et al: Activity and safety of nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, for patients with advanced, refractory squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 063): A phase 2, single-arm trial. Lancet Oncol. 16:257–265. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Böger C, Behrens HM, Mathiak M, Krüger S, Kalthoff H and Röcken C: PD-L1 is an independent prognostic predictor in gastric cancer of Western patients. Oncotarget. 7:24269–24283. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Fang W, Chen Y, Sheng J, Zhou T, Zhang Y, Zhan J, Liu L, Huang J, Peng P and Zhang L: Association between PD-L1 expression on tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and overall survival in patients with gastric cancer. J Cancer. 8:1579–1585. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Saito R, Abe H, Kunita A, Yamashita H, Seto Y and Fukayama M: Overexpression and gene amplification of PD-L1 in cancer cells and PD-L1+ immune cells in Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer: The prognostic implications. Mod Pathol. 30:427–439. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Wen T, Wang Z, Li Y, Li Z, Che X, Fan Y, Wang S, Qu J, Yang X, Hou K, et al: A four-factor immunoscore system that predicts clinical outcome for stage II/III gastric cancer. Cancer Immunol Res. 5:524–534. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Zhang L, Qiu M, Jin Y, Ji J, Li B, Wang X, Yan S, Xu R and Yang D: Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on gastric cancer and its relationship with clinicopathologic factors. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 8:11084–11091. 2015.PubMed/NCBI

28 

Zhang M, Dong Y, Liu H, Wang Y, Zhao S, Xuan Q, Wang Y and Zhang Q: The clinicopathological and prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer: A meta-analysis of 10 studies with 1,901 patients. Sci Rep. 6:379332016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Wu Y, Cao D, Qu L, Cao X, Jia Z, Zhao T, Wang Q and Jiang J: PD-1 and PD-L1 co-expression predicts favorable prognosis in gastric cancer. Oncotarget. 8:64066–64082. 2017.PubMed/NCBI

30 

Brown JA, Dorfman DM, Ma FR, Sullivan EL, Munoz O, Wood CR, Greenfield EA and Freeman GJ: Blockade of programmed death-1 ligands on dendritic cells enhances T cell activation and cytokine production. J Immunol. 170:1257–1266. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Dong H and Chen L: B7-H1 pathway and its role in the evasion of tumor immunity. J Mol Med (Berl). 81:281–287. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Schwarzenbach H, Hoon DS and Pantel K: Cell-free nucleic acids as biomarkers in cancer patients. Nat Rev Cancer. 11:426–437. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

October-2018
Volume 16 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Shi B, Li Q, Ma X, Gao Q, Li L and Chu J: High expression of programmed cell death protein 1 on peripheral blood T‑cell subsets is associated with poor prognosis in metastatic gastric cancer. Oncol Lett 16: 4448-4454, 2018
APA
Shi, B., Li, Q., Ma, X., Gao, Q., Li, L., & Chu, J. (2018). High expression of programmed cell death protein 1 on peripheral blood T‑cell subsets is associated with poor prognosis in metastatic gastric cancer. Oncology Letters, 16, 4448-4454. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9190
MLA
Shi, B., Li, Q., Ma, X., Gao, Q., Li, L., Chu, J."High expression of programmed cell death protein 1 on peripheral blood T‑cell subsets is associated with poor prognosis in metastatic gastric cancer". Oncology Letters 16.4 (2018): 4448-4454.
Chicago
Shi, B., Li, Q., Ma, X., Gao, Q., Li, L., Chu, J."High expression of programmed cell death protein 1 on peripheral blood T‑cell subsets is associated with poor prognosis in metastatic gastric cancer". Oncology Letters 16, no. 4 (2018): 4448-4454. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9190