CHSY1 promoted proliferation and suppressed apoptosis in colorectal cancer through regulation of the NFκB and/or caspase‑3/7 signaling pathway

  • Authors:
    • Lifeng Zeng
    • Jinrong Qian
    • Xiaojiang Luo
    • Aiqun Zhou
    • Zhiyong Zhang
    • Quangang Fang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: September 3, 2018     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9385
  • Pages: 6140-6146
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Colorectal cancer is a commonly observed malignant cancer. However, the limited therapies for colorectal cancer do not bring much benefit for patients. Chondroitin synthase‑1 (CHSY1) is an enzyme responsible for the biosynthesis of chondroitin sulfate and has been implicated in the tumorigenesis of several cancer types; however, there is limited information regarding the role of CHSY1 in colorectal cancer. In the present study, CHSY1 was demonstrated to be highly expressed in colorectal cancer tissues and in cell lines, and the CHSY1 expression level was associated with the 5‑year survival rate of patients with colorectal cancer. Following CHSY1 knockdown, the proliferation of colorectal cancer cells was significantly decreased. The number of RKO cells decreased by 50% following CHSY1 knockdown compared with that in the control after culture for 5 days. However, the apoptosis rate of RKO cells increased to 14.15% after CHSY1 knockdown. In addition, the activity of caspase‑3/7 was also enhanced. Furthermore, the expression of B‑cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl‑2) was reduced, whereas the levels of Bcl‑2‑associated X protein (Bax) and truncated caspase‑3/7 were increased following CHSY1 knockdown. Additionally, the phosphorylation level of IκB and the expression of nuclear factor (NF)κB also decreased. In contrast, forced expression of CHSY1 increased the level of Bcl‑2, NFκB, and phosphorylated IκB, whereas the level of bax and truncated caspase‑3/7 decreased. Therefore, the data of the present study suggest that CHSY1 promoted cell proliferation by regulating NFκB signaling and suppressed cell apoptosis by regulating/caspase‑3/7 signaling in colorectal cancer. The present study also suggests that CHSY1 may be a potential target for colorectal cancer therapy.

Introduction

Chondroitin sulfate (CS) is a class of glycosaminoglycan (GAG), which is mainly present in the extracellular matrix and on the cell surface (1). CS plays very important roles in morphogenesis and tissue development (2). CS also shows an immunomodulatory effect and has been reported to be involved in tumor progression (3,4). For example, in colorectal cancer, the GAG disaccharide content and composition were altered (5). Additionally, in endometrial epithelial cancer, CS promoted cell proliferation and migration (3). Chondroitin synthase-1 (CHSY1) is one of the six enzymes responsible for the biosynthesis of CS in mammalian cells (6). CHSY1is a protein with 802 amino acids and is located in the chromosome 15q26.3 region. CHSY1 is important for normal development. For example, the methylation level of CHSY1 is associated with T cell differentiation (7). CHSY1 is also necessary for bone development (8), and loss of CHSY1 causes temtamy preaxial brachydactyly syndrome (9).

However, evidence suggests an oncogenic function of CHSY1 during tumorigenesis. For example, CHSY1 is required for the interaction of myeloma cells with osteoclasts (10). The abnormal expression of CHSY1 has been found in malignant soft tissue sarcomas (11). Furthermore, knockdown of CHSY1 increased the expression of JAG2, a critical molecule in glioblastoma cells (12). Forced expression of CHSY1 enhanced cell migration, invasion, and EMT in hepatocellular carcinoma (13). As a result, CHSY1 was proposed to promote tumor progression. However, in colorectal cancer, CHSY1 expression showed a significant increase in stage I tumor tissues compared to that in the normal control group. In stage II or III tumor tissues, expression of CHSY1 was comparable or slightly lower than that in control tissues (14). However, the actual function of CHSY1 in colorectal cancer remains unknown.

According to cancer reports by Chen, colorectal cancer is one of the most four malignant cancers in China. The estimated number of new cases was 376,300 and the number of new deaths was ~191,000 (15). Colorectal cancer is also a common malignant cancer in the USA. As reported, both the new incidence and new mortality of colorectal cancer patients accounted for ~8% of all cancers in 2017 (16). Furthermore, the 5-year survival rate of metastatic colorectal cancer patients was <15% (17). However, surgical resection remains the most commonly used therapy for colorectal cancer (17). Unfortunately, ~50% of colorectal cancer patients undergo recurrence and metastasis following surgery (18). Therefore, it is necessary to determine the mechanisms underlying colorectal cancer and develop new strategies to win the war against colorectal cancer.

In this study, to investigate the role of CHSY1 in colorectal cancer, we determined the clinical level of CHSY1 in tumor tissues and evaluated the effects of CHSY1 on cell growth and cell apoptosis. Then, we demonstrated that nuclear factor (NF) κB and caspase-3/7 signaling were regulated by CHSY1.

Materials and methods

Cell lines and cell culture

Human colorectal cancer cell lines, including RKO, HCT116, SW480 and the human immortal colon epithelial cell line NCM460, were obtained from the Shanghai Cell Bank of Chinese Academy of Science (Shanghai, China) and maintained in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China), 100 units/ml penicillin and 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator.

Patient tissues and ethics statement

A total of 21 tumor tissues and the adjacent normal tissues were collected from Jiangxi Province People's Hospital (Nanchang, China) between 2009 and 2012.

All study procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, and a written informed consent form was collected from each patient.

Immunohistochemistry assay (IHC)

The IHC assay was carried out as report before (19). Briefly, tissue sections of 4 µm were deparaffinized, rehydrated, and subjected to antigen retrieval by boiling in sodium citrate buffer (10 mmol/l; pH 6.0). Then the sections were incubated with CHSY1 primary antibody (ab153813; 1:400 dilution; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) for 60 min at room temperature and stained with 3,3-diaminobenzidine followed by counterstaining with hematoxylin and mounted. The stains were scored according to: (a) percentage of immune-positive cells, 1, 0–30%; 2, >30–70%; 3, >70%; and (b) staining intensity, 1, weak; 2, moderate and 3, strong. The final score of each slide was (a) × (b).

Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)

Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and cDNA was synthesized with a PrimeScript First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Takara, Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Next, 1 µl of cDNA was used as a template for the RT-qPCR assay with SYBR Green reagent on a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The primers designed for CHSY1 gene were as follows:

Forward, 5′-GCTATCACATTACACCCCAACA-3′ and reverse, 5′-AACTCCCATTCCAGAATCTCCT-3′

GAPDH was selected as an internal control and the primers were as follows: Forward, 5′-TGACTTCAACAGCGACACCCA-3′ and reverse, 5′-CACCCTGTTGCTGTAGCCAAA-3′

The protocol for RT-qPCR was as follows: Denaturation at 95°C for 20 sec, (denaturation at 95°C for 5 sec, extension at 60°C for 30 sec) for 40 cycles.

The expected PCR products of CHSY1 and GAPDH were 236 and 121 bp, respectively. All samples were examined in triplicate. The relative level of the target gene was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCq as described previously (20). The expression level of CHSY1 was considered as high when the fold change of CHSY1 in tumor tissues vs. that in normal control was >2. Otherwise, it was considered as low.

Construction of recombinant lentiviral vector and transduction

The shRNA fragment targeting human theCHSY1 gene (GenBank no. NM_014918) was designed, synthesized, and inserted into a lentivirus expression plasmid pGV115-GFP. The shRNA sequence was as follows: 5-ACATTGTCATGCAGGTCAT-3. Then, the lentivirus particle carrying this shRNA fragment (shCHSY1) was prepared.

After the lentivirus particle was prepared, approximately 2×105 RKO cells/well were cultured in 6-well plates and infected with shCHSY1 lentivirus or control lentivirus (shCtrl) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 20. Then, the treated cells were incubated in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C for 5 days. After 72 h of infection, cells were observed under a fluorescence microscope (MicroPublisher 3.3RTV; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). After 5 days of infection, the knockdown efficiency of CHSY1 was determined using RT-qPCR and western blotting technologies.

Cell proliferation assay

Cell growth viability was monitored on a Cellomics ArrayScan VT1 HCS automated reader (Cellomics Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, USA). Briefly, RKO cells infected with lentivirus were seeded into 96-well plates (2,000 cells/well) and incubated for 5 days at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator, and the cell number was calculated each day for 5 days according to the GFP expression intensity. Each experiment was performed in triplicate.

MTT assay

SW480 cells or RKO cells treated with shCHSY1 lentivirus or shCtrl were seeded into 96-well plates at 6,000 cells/well and cultured for 48 h at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. Then MTT reagent (5 mg/ml; Sangon Biotech) was added into each well and cultured for another 4 h. The absorbance value at 490 nm was detected on a microplate spectrophotometer.

Apoptosis analysis

The cell apoptosis rate was determined with Annexin V-APC staining by flow cytometry. Briefly, RKO cells (5,000 cells/well) were cultured in 6-well plates. After 48 h of lentivirus infection, cells were collected and washed twice with ice-cold PBS. Then, cells were adjusted to 1×106/ml with 1X staining buffer (Sangon Biotech), of which 100 µl of the cell suspension was stained with 5 µl Annexin V-APC (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA) for 15 min at room temperature in the dark. Then, the cells were analyzed on a flow cytometer. Each experiment was performed independently three times.

Caspase-3/7 activity assay

To detect the activity of caspase-3/7, we seeded the RKO cells into 96-well plates and infected them with the lentivirus as described above. After infection for 48 h, the activity of caspase-3/7 was determined with a Caspase-Glo 3/7 kit (Promega Corp., Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Western blot analysis

After 48 h of lentivirus infection, approximately 1×106 cells were collected and lysed with lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% SDS, 1 mM EDTA, and 1% NP-40) containing 1 mM PMSF (Sangon Biotech) for 30 min on ice. Then, the lysates were centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C, and the supernatants were collected. The protein concentration was determined using a BCA Protein Assay kit (Generay, Shanghai, China). Then, approximately 10 µg of protein was separated on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to a polyvinylidenedifluoride (PVDF) membrane.

PVDF membranes were incubated with mouse anti-CHSY1 (1:200 dilution; ab153813), anti-NFκB p105/p50 (1:300 dilution; ab131546), anti-B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2; 1:500 dilution; ab32124), anti-truncated caspase-3/7 (1:1,000 dilution; ab2302), anti-Bcl-2-associated X protein (Bax; 1:400 dilution; ab182733; Abcam), anti-Pi-IκB (1:200 dilution; sc8404), or anti-GAPDH antibody (1:1,500 dilution; sc47724; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) at 4°C overnight. Then, the PVDF membranes were subsequently incubated with a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (1:1,500 dilution; sc2005) or goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:1,200 dilution; sc2030; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at 37°C for 1 h and detected with the EasyBlot ECL kit (Sangon Biotech).

Statistical evaluation

For in vitro experiments, statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 16.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Raw data was subjected to Independent Samples t-test to analyze the difference between group shCtrl and shCHSY1. The difference between multiple groups was analyzed by one-way ANOVA/post hoc Tukey Test. The difference of CHSY1 expression between tumor tissues and adjacent normal tissues was analyzed with paired Student's t-test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

For the association analysis of CHSY1 expression with the prognosis of patients, the Kaplan-Meier method was used, and a log-rank test was employed to analyze the difference. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

CHSY1 is clinically associated with colorectal cancer

To explore the relationship of CHSY1 with colorectal cancer, we collected a total of 21 tumor samples and adjacent normal samples. Then, the level of CHSY1 was detected using the RT-qPCR method. As shown in Fig. 1A, CHSY1 was more highly expressed in tumor samples than in adjacent normal samples. IHC staining also demonstrated that CHSY1 was expressed highly in tumor tissues and was weak in the adjacent normal control (Fig. 1B and Table I). Furthermore, higher CHSY1 expression was associated with a poorer prognosis, such that the 5-year survival rate of patients with high CHSY1 (tumor: Normal ≥2) was significantly lower than those with low CHSY1 expression (tumor: Normal <2) (20% vs. 45%) (Fig. 1C). In addition, we found that CHSY1 was more highly expressed in colorectal cancer cell lines, including RKO, HCT116, and SW480, than in NCM460 cells, a human colon epithelial cell (Fig. 1D). Therefore, CHSY1 was clinically associated with colorectal cancer.

Table I.

Mean score of CHSY1 expression in tumor tissues or adjacent normal tissues by IHC analysis.

Table I.

Mean score of CHSY1 expression in tumor tissues or adjacent normal tissues by IHC analysis.

GroupAdjacent normal tissuesTumor tissuesP-value
Score value0.52±0.514.24±2.43<0.05a

a Significant difference between tumor tissues and adjacent normal tissues. CHSY1, chondroitin synthase-1; IHC, immunohistochemistry.

CHSY1 was successfully knocked down by lentivirus-mediated shRNA in colorectal cancer cells

The lentivirus vector was an efficient tool to carry a particular gene into cells and was applied extensively. To reduce the expression of CHSY1 in the RKO cell line, we synthesized a shRNA fragment targeting CHSY1 (shCHSY1) and the negative control (shCtrl) and prepared lentivirus particles carrying shCHSY1 or shCtrl. Because GFP was a tag in the lentivirus vector, the infection efficiency of shCHSY1 in RKO cells could be monitored directly under a microscope. As shown in Fig. 2A, the prepared lentivirus particles efficiently infected RKO cells. And CHSY1 expression was significantly reduced in RKO cells at protein level (Fig. 2B). Also, the mRNA level of CHSY1 was decreased greatly by shCHSY1 in RKO cells. The knockdown efficiency was ~70%. Therefore, CHSY1 was successfully knocked down in the RKO cell line.

CHSY1 serves critical roles in the proliferation of colorectal cancer cells

To examine the effects of CHSY1 knockdown on cell proliferation, we treated RKO cells seeded in a 96-well plate with shCHSY1 or shCtrl and monitored the cells for 5 consecutive days with Cellomics. As shown in Fig. 3A, the GFP intensity in the shCtrl group was higher than that in the shCHSY1 group, which indicated that RKO cells treated with shCtrl underwent significant expansion after culture for 5 days. This was further supported by Fig. 3B and D. The cell number in the shCtrl group doubled compared to that in the shCHSY1 group. In addition, CHSY1 was effectively reduced in SW480 cells (Fig. 3C), and the proliferation of SW480 cells was inhibited after CHSY1 knockdown (Fig. 3D). Therefore, we hypothesized that CHSY1 was essential for cell proliferation in colorectal cancer.

Knockdown of CHSY1 induces apoptosis in RKO cells

In tumor cells, apoptosis was often suppressed by a driver gene. Not surprisingly, we found that decreased expression of CHSY1 increased cell apoptosis in RKO cells. As demonstrated in Fig. 4A and B, the apoptosis rate of cells treated with shCtrl was 5.09%, whereas it was 14.15% in the shCHSY1 group. The difference between the two groups was significant (P<0.05). Then, the activity of caspase-3/7 was determined in RKO cells, and the activity of caspase-3/7 in the shCHSY1 group was approximately 6-foldthat in the shCtrl group (Fig. 4C). The above data suggested that CHSY1 played important roles in the apoptosis of RKO cells.

CHSY1 regulates NFκB and caspase-3/7 signaling in RKO cells

To elucidate the mechanism by which CHSY1 affects cell proliferation and apoptosis in colorectal cancer, we determined the critical signaling molecules in proliferation and apoptosis. As shown in Fig. 5, expression of the anti-apoptotic molecule Bcl-2 was decreased after CHSY1 was knocked down in RKO cells. In contrast, the level of the pro-apoptotic molecule Bax increased significantly, and the level of truncated caspase-3/7 was also increased. Additionally, we found that the phosphorylation level of IκB was decreased, whereas total IκB was increased after CHSY1 knockdown. Moreover, the expression of NFκB was also reduced. Conversely, overexpression of CHSY1 increased the level of NFκB and the phosphorylated level of IκB; however, total IκB expression was decreased. Moreover, Bcl-2 was upregulated, whereas Bax and truncated caspase-3/7 levels were reduced. Therefore, we hypothesized that CHSY1 regulated cell proliferation and apoptosis via regulation of the NFκB and/or caspase-3/7 signaling pathway in RKO cells.

Discussion

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignant diseases in the world and threatens the life of humans. The most effective weapon against colorectal cancer is just a scalpel, but we are currently losing the war. One of the major causes of the poor prognosis in colorectal cancer is the heterogeneity of the cancer (21). Although a number of factors have been identified, none are able to fully explain the formation or progression of cancer. In this study, we demonstrated that CHSY1 was expressed more highly in colorectal cancer tissues and colorectal cancer cell lines than in control tissues and lines. Moreover, higher CHSY1 expression was associated with a worse 5-year survival rate. These data indicate that CHSY1 may play critical roles in the progression of colorectal cancer. In a previous study, CHSY1 was significantly upregulated in stage I colorectal cancer but not in stage II or III (14). In this study, we showed that CHSY1 was more highly expressed in both stage II and III colorectal cancer tissues than in the adjacent normal control. The difference may be partially attributed to the origin of the tumor tissues. However, a large cohort of patient tissues was necessary to clearly explain this paradox and to confirm the discovery in this study.

Nearly all types of cancers are characterized by rapid expansion and evasion from drug-induced apoptosis (22). Here, we showed that CHSY1 was essential for the proliferation of colorectal cancer cell lines, including RKO cells and SW480 cells. The NFκB signaling pathway was often activated in tumors and promoted cell proliferation (23,24). In RKO cells, the level of NFκB and phosphorylated IκB was decreased, whereas total IκB was increased after CHSY1 knockdown. Conversely, CHSY1 overexpression increased the level of NFκB and phosphorylated IκB in RKO cells. In tumors, IκB was phosphorylated and separated from the NFκB molecule. When the level of phosphorylated IκB decreased, NFκB was bound by IκB, and the expression of downstream genes was inhibited (25). Therefore, CHSY1 suppressed cell proliferation via regulation of the NFκB signaling pathway in colorectal cancer.

Additionally, in RKO cells, CHSY1 could suppress cell apoptosis, which may partially account for the poor prognosis of colorectal cancer patients. The major mechanism of a large number of chemotherapeutic drugs in the clinic is apoptosis (26,27). Generally, chemotherapeutic drugs further clear remaining cancer cells by inducing cell apoptosis after the surgical removal of solid tumor tissues, and patients do benefit from this treatment. However, a small cohort of cancer cells is able to evolve and evade the apoptosis induced by drugs.

Apoptosis is a programmed cell death process, and the caspase cascade response is active when apoptosis begins. In general, the activity of caspase-3/7 is greatly enhanced in the apoptosis process (28,29). In this study, CHSY1 was shown to contribute to the anti-apoptotic ability of RKO cells, and caspase-3/7 was highly activated after CHSY1 was knocked down in RKO cells. Furthermore, we found that Bcl-2 was decreased, whereas Bax increased after knockdown of CHSY1. Bcl-2 is an antagonistic gene of apoptosis (28), but Bax often promotes the progression of apoptosis (28,29). The expression pattern suggested that caspase-3/7-mediated apoptosis signaling was activated when CHSY1 was knocked down in RKO cells.

However, these results were just based on RKO cells. And it is necessary to confirm the role of CHSY1 in another cell line such as SW480 cells. Also, the in vivo function of CHSY1 gene in colorectal cancer will be explored and the dominant molecular mechanism of CHSY1 in colorectal cancer will be an emphasis in future.

In summary, we demonstrated that CHSY1 played a tumor-promoting role in colorectal cancer by regulating the NFκB and/or caspase-3/7 signaling pathway. Additionally, this study suggests that CHSY1 is a potential target for colorectal cancer therapy.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

LZ designed the whole study, carried out the experiments and wrote the manuscript. JQ analyzed the data. XL contributed to the acquisition of data, carried out the western blot experiments, participated in the draft and revision of manuscript and studied the references.. AZ and ZZ participated in the experiments and interpreted the immunohistochemistry data. QF reviewed the manuscript and contributed to the acquisition of data.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All study procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, and a written informed consent form was collected from each patient.

Patient consent for pubication

The patients provided written informed consent for the publication of any associated data.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Martel-Pelletier J, Boileau C, Pelletier JP and Roughley PJ: Cartilage in normal and osteoarthritis conditions. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 22:351–384. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Holmborn K, Habicher J, Kasza Z, Eriksson AS, Filipek-Gorniok B, Gopal S, Couchman JR, Ahlberg PE, Wiweger M, Spillmann D, et al: On the roles and regulation of chondroitin sulfate and heparin sulfate in zebrafish pharyngeal cartilage morphogenesis. J Biol Chem. 287:33905–33916. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Winship A, Van Sinderen M, Heffernan-Marks A and Dimitriadis E: Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan protein is stimulated by interleukin 11 and promotes endometrial epithelial cancer cell proliferation and migration. Int J Oncol. 50:798–804. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

du Souich P, García AG, Vergés J and Montell E: Immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects of chondroitin sulphate. J Cell Mol Med. 13:1451–1463. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Kalathas D, Theocharis DA, Bounias D, Kyriakopoulou D, Papageorgakopoulou N, Stavropoulos MS and Vynios DH: Alterations of glycosaminoglycan disaccharide content and composition in colorectal cancer: Structural and expressional studies. Oncol Rep. 22:369–375. 2009.PubMed/NCBI

6 

Ogawa H, Hatano S, Sugiura N, Nagai N, Sato T, Shimizu K, Kimata K, Narimatsu H and Watanabe H: Chondroitin sulfate synthase-2 is necessary for chain extension of chondroitin sulfate but not critical for skeletal development. PLoS One. 7:e438062012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Hashimoto SI, Ogoshi K, Sasaki A, Abe J, Qu W, Nakatani Y, Ahsan B, Oshima K, Shand FH, Ametani A, et al: Coordinated changes in DNA methylation in antigen-specific memory CD4 T cells. J Immunol. 190:4076–4091. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Wilson DG, Phamluong K, Lin WY, Barck K, Carano RA, Diehl L, Peterson AS, Martin F and Solloway MJ: Chondroitin sulfate synthase 1 (Chsy1) is required for bone development and digit patterning. Dev Biol. 363:413–425. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Li Y, Laue K, Temtamy S, Aglan M, Kotan LD, Yigit G, Canan H, Pawlik B, Nürnberg G, Wakeling EL, et al: Temtamy preaxial brachydactyly syndrome is caused by loss-of-function mutations in chondroitin synthase 1, a potential target of BMP signaling. Am J Hum Genet. 87:757–767. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Yin L: Chondroitin synthase 1 is a key molecule in myeloma cell-osteoclast interactions. J Biol Chem. 280:15666–15672. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Momose T, Yoshimura Y, Harumiya S, Isobe K, Kito M, Fukushima M, Kato H and Nakayama J: Chondroitin sulfate synthase 1 expression is associated with malignant potential of soft tissue sarcomas with myxoid substance. Hum Pathol. 50:15–23. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Tian J, Ling L, Shboul M, Lee H, O'Connor B, Merriman B, Nelson SF, Cool S, Ababneh OH, Al-Hadidy A, et al: Loss of CHSY1, a secreted FRINGE enzyme, causes syndromic brachydactyly in humans via increased NOTCH signaling. Am J Hum Genet. 87:768–778. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Liu CH, Lan CT, Chou JF, Tseng TJ and Liao WC: CHSY1 promotes aggressive phenotypes of hepatocellular carcinoma cells via activation of the hedgehog signaling pathway. Cancer Lett. 403:280–288. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Kalathas D, Theocharis DA, Bounias D, Kyriakopoulou D, Papageorgakopoulou N, Stavropoulos MS and Vynios DH: Chondroitin synthases I, II, III and chondroitin sulfate glucuronyltransferase expression in colorectal cancer. Mol Med Rep. 4:363–368. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

15 

Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, Jemal A, Yu XQ and He J: Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 66:115–132. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Siegel RL, Miller KD and Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 67:7–30. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Pabla B, Bissonnette M and Konda VJ: Colon cancer and the epidermal growth factor receptor: Current treatment paradigms, the importance of diet, and the role of chemoprevention. World J Clin Oncol. 6:133–141. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Sauer R, Liersch T, Merkel S, Fietkau R, Hohenberger W, Hess C, Becker H, Raab HR, Villanueva MT, Witzigmann H, et al: Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: Results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 randomized phase III trial after a median follow-up of 11 years. J Clin Oncol. 30:1926–1933. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Luo Y, Tsuchiya KD II, Park D, Fausel R, Kanngurn S, Welcsh P, Dzieciatkowski S, Wang J and Grady WM: RET is a potential tumor suppressor gene in colorectal cancer. Oncogene. 32:2037–2047. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Fisher R, Pusztai L and Swanton C: Cancer heterogeneity: Implications for targeted therapeutics. Br J Cancer. 108:479–485. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Hanahan D and Weinberg RA: Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell. 144:646–674. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Xia JT, Chen LZ, Jian WH, Wang KB, Yang YZ, He WL, He YL, Chen D and Li W: MicroRNA-362 induces cell proliferation and apoptosis resistance in gastric cancer by activation of NF-κB signaling. J Transl Med. 12:332014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Cui H, Yuan J, Du X, Wang M, Yue L and Liu J: Ethyl gallate suppresses proliferation and invasion in human breast cancer cells via Akt-NF-κB signaling. Oncol Rep. 33:1284–1290. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Li F, Zhang J, Arfuso F, Chinnathambi A, Zayed ME, Alharbi SA, Kumar AP, Ahn KS and Sethi G: NF-κB in cancer therapy. Arch Toxicol. 89:711–731. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Makin G and Hickman JA: Apoptosis and cancer chemotherapy. Cell Tissue Res. 301:143–152. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Dandekar DS, Lopez M, Carey RI and Lokeshwar BL: Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor celecoxib augments chemotherapeutic drug-induced apoptosis by enhancing activation of caspase-3 and −9 in prostate cancer cells. Int J Cancer. 115:484–492. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Wong RS: Apoptosis in cancer: From pathogenesis to treatment. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 30:872011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Vermeulen K, Van Bockstaele DR and Berneman ZN: Apoptosis: Mechanisms and relevance in cancer. Ann Hematol. 84:627–639. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

November-2018
Volume 16 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Zeng L, Qian J, Luo X, Zhou A, Zhang Z and Fang Q: CHSY1 promoted proliferation and suppressed apoptosis in colorectal cancer through regulation of the NFκB and/or caspase‑3/7 signaling pathway. Oncol Lett 16: 6140-6146, 2018
APA
Zeng, L., Qian, J., Luo, X., Zhou, A., Zhang, Z., & Fang, Q. (2018). CHSY1 promoted proliferation and suppressed apoptosis in colorectal cancer through regulation of the NFκB and/or caspase‑3/7 signaling pathway. Oncology Letters, 16, 6140-6146. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9385
MLA
Zeng, L., Qian, J., Luo, X., Zhou, A., Zhang, Z., Fang, Q."CHSY1 promoted proliferation and suppressed apoptosis in colorectal cancer through regulation of the NFκB and/or caspase‑3/7 signaling pathway". Oncology Letters 16.5 (2018): 6140-6146.
Chicago
Zeng, L., Qian, J., Luo, X., Zhou, A., Zhang, Z., Fang, Q."CHSY1 promoted proliferation and suppressed apoptosis in colorectal cancer through regulation of the NFκB and/or caspase‑3/7 signaling pathway". Oncology Letters 16, no. 5 (2018): 6140-6146. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9385