|
1
|
Luksch R, Castellani MR, Collini P, De
Bernardi B, Conte M, Gambini C, Gandola L, Garaventa A, Biasoni D,
Podda M, et al: Neuroblastoma (Peripheral neuroblastic tumours).
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 107:163–181. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
2
|
Haupt R, Garaventa A, Gambini C, Parodi S,
Cangemi G, Casale F, Viscardi E, Bianchi M, Prete A, Jenkner A, et
al: Improved survival of children with neuroblastoma between 1979
and 2005: A report of the Italian Neuroblastoma Registry. J Clin
Oncol. 28:2331–2338. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3
|
Defferrari R, Mazzocco K, Ambros IM,
Ambros PF, Bedwell C, Beiske K, Bénard J, Berbegall AP, Bown N,
Combaret V, et al: Influence of segmental chromosome abnormalities
on survival in children over the age of 12 months with unresectable
localised peripheral neuroblastic tumours without MYCN
amplification. Br J Cancer. 112:290–295. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4
|
Tonini GP: Growth, progression and
chromosome instability of Neuroblastoma: A new scenario of
tumorigenesis? BMC Cancer. 17(20)2017.
|
|
5
|
Molenaar JJ, Koster J, Zwijnenburg DA, van
Sluis P, Valentijn LJ, van der Ploeg I, Hamdi M, van Nes J,
Westerman BA, van Arkel J, et al: Sequencing of neuroblastoma
identifies chromothripsis and defects in neuritogenesis genes.
Nature. 483:589–593. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6
|
Kaneko Y, Kanda N, Maseki N and Sakurai M,
Tsuchida Y, Takeda T, Okabe I and Sakurai M: Different karyotypic
patterns in early and advanced stage neuroblastomas. Cancer Res.
47:311–318. 1987.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
7
|
Janoueix-Lerosey I, Schleiermacher G,
Michels E, Mosseri V, Ribeiro A, Lequin D, Vermeulen J, Couturier
J, Peuchmaur M, Valent A, et al: Overall genomic pattern is a
predictor of outcome in neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 27:1026–1033.
2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
8
|
Stigliani S, Coco S, Moretti S, Oberthuer
A, Fischer M, Theissen J, Gallo F, Garavent A, Berthold F, Bonassi
S, et al: High genomic instability predicts survival in metastatic
high-risk neuroblastoma. Neoplasia. 14:823–832. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
9
|
Hahn WC and Weinberg RA: Modelling the
molecular circuitry of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2:331–341. 2002.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
10
|
Vogelstein B and Kinzler KW: The multistep
nature of cancer. Trends Genet. 9:138–141. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
11
|
Vogelstein B and Kinzler KW: Cancer genes
and the pathways they control. Nat Med. 10:789–799. 2004.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
12
|
Albertson DG, Collins C, McCormick F and
Gray JW: Chromosome aberrations in solid tumors. Nature Genet.
34:369–376. 2003. View
Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
13
|
Cahill DP, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B and
Lengauer C: Genetic instability and darwinian selection in tumours.
Trends Cell Biol. 9:M57–M60. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
14
|
Heng HH, Bremer SW, Stevens JB, Horne SD,
Liu G, Abdallah BY, Ye KJ and Ye CJ: Chromosomal instability (CIN):
What it is and why it is crucial to cancer evolution. Cancer
Metastasis Rev. 32:325–340. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
15
|
Duesberg P, Rausch C, Rasnick D and
Hehlmann R: Genetic instability of cancer cells is proportional to
their degree of aneuploidy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 95:13692–13697.
1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
16
|
Li R, Sonik A, Stindl R, Rasnick D and
Duesberg P: Aneuploidy vs. gene mutation hypothesis of cancer:
Recent study claims mutation but is found to support aneuploidy.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 97:3236–3241. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
17
|
Lengauer C, Kinzler KW and Vogelstein B:
Genetic instabilities in human cancers. Nature. 396:643–649. 1998.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
Rajagopalan H, Nowak MA, Vogelstein B and
Lengauer C: The significance of unstable chromosomes in colorectal
cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 3:695–701. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19
|
Aguilera A and García-Muse T: Causes of
genome instability. Annu Rev Genet. 47:1–32. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
20
|
Giam M and Rancati G: Aneuploidy and
chromosomal instability in cancer: A jackpot to chaos. Cell Div.
10:32015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
21
|
Nowell PC: The clonal evolution of tumor
cell populations. Science. 194:23–28. 1976. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
22
|
Tonini GP: Molecular mechanisms involved
in DNA repair, in gene rearrangement and in gene amplification may
be considered as an integrated system in maintaining cellular
homeostasis and cell survival. Anticancer Res. 8:881–884.
1988.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
23
|
Matzke MA, Mette MF, Kanno T and Matzke
AJ: Does the intrinsic instability of aneuploid genomes have a
causal role in cancer? Trends Genet. 19:253–256. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
24
|
Gisselsson D: Chromosome instability in
cancer: How, when, and why? Adv Cancer Res. 87:1–29. 2003.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
25
|
Marx J: Debate surges over the origins of
genomic defects in cancer. Science. 297:544–546. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
26
|
Sieber OM, Heinimann K and Tomlinson IP:
Genomic instability-the engine of tumorigenesis? Nat Rev Cancer.
3:701–708. 2003. View
Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
27
|
Bakhoum SF and Compton DA: Chromosomal
instability and cancer: A complex relationship with therapeutic
potential. J Clin Invest. 122:1138–1143. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
28
|
Lengauer C, Kinzler KW and Vogelstein B:
Genetic instability in colorectal cancers. Nature. 386:623–627.
1997. View
Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
29
|
Thompson SL and Compton DA: Examining the
link between chromosomal instability and aneuploidy in human cells.
J Cell Biol. 180:665–672. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
30
|
Bloomfield M and Duesberg P: Inherent
variability of cancer-specific aneuploidy generates metastases. Mol
Cytogenet. 9:902016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
31
|
Targa A and Rancati G: Cancer: A CINful
evolution. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 52:136–144. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
32
|
Sheltzer JM and Amon A: The aneuploidy
paradox: Costs and benefits of an incorrect karyotype. Trends
Genet. 27:446–453. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
33
|
Weaver BA and Cleveland DW: The aneuploidy
paradox in cell growth and tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell. 14:431–433.
2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
34
|
Silk AD, Zasadil LM, Holland AJ, Vitre B,
Cleveland DW and Weaver BA: Chromosome missegregation rate predicts
whether aneuploidy will promote or suppress tumors. Proc Natl Acad
Sci USA. 110:E4134–E4141. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
35
|
Komarova NL and Wodarz D: The optimal rate
of chromosome loss for the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes
in cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101:7017–7021. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
36
|
Rivera-Rivera Y and Saavedra HI:
Centrosome-a promising anti-cancer target. Biologics. 10:167–176.
2016.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
37
|
Cicenas J: The Aurora kinase inhibitors in
cancer research and therapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol.
142:1995–2012. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
38
|
Kaur R, Kaur G, Gill RK, Soni R and
Bariwal J: Recent developments in tubulin polymerization
inhibitors: An overview. Eur J Med Chem. 87:89–124. 2014.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
39
|
Gavande NS, VanderVere-Carozza PS, Hinshaw
HD, Jalal SI, Sears CR, Pawelczak KS and Turchi JJ: DNA repair
targeted therapy: The past or future of cancer treatment? Pharmacol
Ther. 160:65–83. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
40
|
Bhattacharjee S and Nandi S: Synthetic
lethality in DNA repair network: A novel avenue in targeted cancer
therapy and combination therapeutics. IUBMB Life. 69:929–937. 2017.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
41
|
Bayani J, Selvarajah S, Maire G, Vukovic
B, Al-Romaih K, Zielenska M and Squire JA: Genomic mechanisms and
measurement of structural and numerical instability in cancer
cells. Semin Cancer Biol. 17:5–18. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
42
|
Kaye JA, Melo JA, Cheung SK, Vaze MB,
Haber JE and Toczyski DP: DNA breaks promote genomic instability by
impeding proper chromosome segregation. Curr Biol. 14:2096–2106.
2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
43
|
Bakhoum SF, Kabeche L, Murnane JP, Zaki BI
and Compton DA: DNA-damage response during mitosis induces
whole-chromosome missegregation. Cancer Discov. 4:1281–1289. 2014.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
44
|
Heng HH, Spyropoulos B and Moens PB: FISH
technology in chromosome and genome research. BioEssays. 19:75–84.
1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
45
|
Imle A, Polzer B, Alexander S, Klein CA
and Friedl P: Genomic instability of micronucleated cells revealed
by single-cell comparative genomic hybridization. Cytometry A.
75:562–568. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
46
|
Kronenwett U, Huwendiek S, Ostring C,
Portwood N, Roblick UJ, Pawitan Y, Alaiya A, Sennerstam R,
Zetterberg A and Auer G: Improved grading of breast adenocarcinomas
based on genomic instability. Cancer Res. 64:904–909. 2004.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
47
|
Mullauer L: Next generation sequencing:
Clinical applications in solid tumours. Memo. 10:244–247. 2017.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
48
|
Williams BR, Prabhu VR, Hunter KE, Glazier
CM, Whittaker CA, Housman DE and Amon A: Aneuploidy affects
proliferation and spontaneous immortalization in mammalian cells.
Science. 322:703–709. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
49
|
Drost J, van Jaarsveld RH, Ponsioen B,
Zimberlin C, van Boxtel R, Buijs A, Sachs N, Overmeer RM, Offerhaus
GJ, Begthel H, et al: Sequential cancer mutations in cultured human
intestinal stem cells. Nature. 521:43–47. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
50
|
Schukken KM and Foijer F: CIN and
aneuploidy: Different concepts, different consequences. Bioessays.
40:2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
51
|
Coco S, Theissen J, Scaruffi P, Stigliani
S, Moretti S, Oberthuer A, Valdora F, Fischer M, Gallo F, Hero B,
et al: Age-dependent accumulation of genomic aberrations and
deregulation of cell cycle and telomerase genes in metastatic
neuroblastoma. Int J Cancer. 131:1591–1600. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
52
|
Masecchia S, Coco S, Barla A, Verri A and
Tonini GP: Genome instability model of metastatic neuroblastoma
tumorigenesis by a dictionary learning algorithm. BMC Med Genomics.
8:572015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
53
|
Schleiermacher G, Janoueix-Lerosey I and
Delattre O: Recent insights into the biology of neuroblastoma. Int
J Cancer. 135:2249–2261. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
54
|
Schnepp RW, Khurana P, Attiyeh EF, Raman
P, Chodosh SE, Oldridge DA, Gagliardi ME, Conkrite KL, Asgharzadeh
S, Seeger RC, et al: A LIN28B-RAN-AURKA signaling network promotes
neuroblastoma tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell. 28:599–609. 2015.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
55
|
Carter SL, Eklund AC, Kohane IS, Harris LN
and Szallasi Z: A signature of chromosomal instability inferred
from gene expression profiles predicts clinical outcome in multiple
human cancers. Nat Genet. 38:1043–1048. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
56
|
Chan SH and Ngeow J: Germline mutation
contribution to chromosomal instability. Endocr Relat Cancer.
24:T33–T46. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
