Open Access

lncRNA HOTTIP facilitates osteosarcoma cell migration, invasion and epithelial‑mesenchymal transition by forming a positive feedback loop with c‑Myc

  • Authors:
    • Yang Tang
    • Fang Ji
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: June 10, 2019     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10463
  • Pages: 1649-1656
  • Copyright: © Tang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Homeobox A transcript at the distal tip (HOTTIP) is an oncogenic long non‑coding RNA in cancer. The aim of the present study was to investigate the function and mechanism of HOTTIP in the aggressive behaviors of human osteosarcoma (OS) cells. Expression levels of HOTTIP and epithelial‑mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers were determined by reverse transcription‑quantitative PCR. Cell invasive and migratory abilities were evaluated in vitro using Matrigel and wound healing assays, respectively. Knockdown of HOTTIP expression was achieved by small interfering RNA‑mediated silencing. Overexpression of c‑Myc was accomplished by transfecting cultured cells with a c‑Myc overexpression plasmid. HOTTIP was demonstrated to be upregulated in OS tissues and cell lines; knockdown of HOTTIP inhibited OS cell migration, invasion and EMT, and suppressed c‑Myc expression. In addition, overexpression of c‑Myc increased HOTTIP expression and enhanced OS cell migration and invasion. HOTTIP promoted cell migration and invasion by upregulating c‑Myc in OS. The positive feedback loop formed by HOTTIP and c‑Myc may contribute to OS progression, and HOTTIP may act as a therapeutic target for OS.

Introduction

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary malignant bone tumor frequently occurring in children and adolescents (1). Originating from mesenchymal cells, OS often results in pulmonary metastasis and has poor overall prognosis (2,3). Amputation and chemotherapy are the most common treatment options for OS; however, ~40% of treated patients experience tumor metastasis, which ultimately leads to an adverse clinical outcome (4,5). Therefore, it is imperative to understand the mechanisms triggering OS metastasis for the management of this disease.

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are a group of evolutionarily conserved non-coding RNAs >200 nucleotides long with no or limited protein coding capacity (6). Based on the location and sequence, lncRNAs can be classified into five types: Sense, antisense, bidirectional, intronic and intergenic (7,8). A number of previous studies have indicated that lncRNAs are involved in almost every aspect of cell biology and contribute to tumor development by various mechanisms (911). Although multiple lncRNAs are abnormally expressed in cancer tissues and function as potent oncogenes or tumor suppressors (1214), only a small number of lncRNAs have had clear underlying mechanisms identified. lncRNAs are crucial for OS initiation and progression (15,16). For instance, nuclear paraspeckle assembly transcript 1, small nucleolar RNA host gene 4 and tumor protein p73 antisense RNA 1 have been identified as oncogenic lncRNAs associated with poor prognosis of patients with OS (1719).

Homeobox A transcript at the distal tip (HOTTIP) is an lncRNA transcribed from the 5′tip of homeobox A (HOXA) locus that controls HOXA gene expression (20). HOTTIP is significantly upregulated in human cancers; it is functionally linked with carcinogenesis and represents a potential prognostic biomarker in cancer (21). The majority of studies on HOTTIP support its oncogenic roles, including promoting cell proliferation, inhibiting apoptosis and facilitating cell migration (22). Li et al (23), reported that HOTTIP was upregulated in OS, promoted cell proliferation, migration and invasion in vitro, and higher HOTTIP expression levels were associated with poor survival. HOTTIP also increased chemoresistance of OS cells (24). However, its roles and mechanisms in OS migration, invasion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) remain unclear. Notably, HOTTIP could activate the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in OS cells (24). Since c-Myc is a vital target gene and effector of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, which is associated with the malignant phenotypes of OS, including migration, invasion and EMT (25), this study hypothesized that HOTTIP could also induce c-Myc expression in OS cells. Considering the previously described attributes of HOTTIP activity, it was hypothesized that HOTTIP may be involved in OS migration, invasion and EMT.

Materials and methods

Patients and tissues

Twenty-five pairs of human OS tissues and adjacent non-tumoral tissues were obtained from patients (range, 14–28 years old; 10 male and 15 female patients) with OS who received surgical treatment at the Department of Orthopedics, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University (Shanghai, China), between January 2016 and June 2017. All samples were obtained with informed consent and approved by the Ethics Committee of Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University (Shanghai, China). The tissues were frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately and stored at −80°C.

Cell culture

Human normal osteoblastic cell line hFOB1.19 and OS cell lines SaoS2, HOS, U2OS and MG63 were purchased from The Cell Bank of Type Tissue Collection of the Chinese Academy of Science or the American Type Culture Collection. HOS cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), while other cell lines were cultured in DMEM (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). All media were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and cells were cultured at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2.

Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)

RT-qPCR was used to determine the expression levels of HOTTIP, β-catenin and c-Myc in tissues and cells (including hFOB1.19, SaoS2, HOS, U2OS and MG63 cell lines). Total RNA was extracted from tissues (≥100 mg) and cells (≥1×105) using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) following the manufacturer's protocol. cDNA was synthesized using GoScript Reverse Transcription Mix, Random Primers (Promega Corporation). qPCR was performed in an ABI7500 instrument using Toyobo SYBR Green Realtime PCR Master Mix (cat. no., QPK-201; Toyobo Life Sciences). The following thermocycling conditions were used: Initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 min; followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 1 min; finally dissociation at 60°C for 10 min. β-actin was used as an internal control. Fold changes were calculated using the relative quantification (2−ΔΔCq) method (26). The primers used were as follows: HOTTIP, forward 5′-CCTAAAGCCACGCTTCTTTG-3′, reverse 5′-TGCAGGCTGGAGATCCTACT-3′; β-actin, forward 5′-TCTTCGCCTTAATACTTGT-3′, reverse 5′-AAGCCTTCATACATCTCAA-3′; β-catenin, forward 5′-CCTTTGTCCCGCAAATCATG-3′, reverse 5′-CGTACGGCGCTGGGTATC-3′; c-Myc, forward 5′-TACATCCTGTCGGTCCAA-3′, reverse 5′-AACTGTTCTCGCCTCTTC-3′.

Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), overexpression plasmids and transfections

HOTTIP siRNAs and negative control (si-NC) were purchased from Shanghai GenePharma Co, Ltd. The sequences were as follows: NC siRNA, 5′-GGUGGAACAAUUGCUUUUA-3′; HOTTIP siRNA 1, 5′-AAAUUGCUCACUAACAGUGUG-3′; HOTTIP siRNA 2, 5′-UUUUCUUGUCCCAAAAUAGAG-3′. The plasmids containing the coding sequences of the two isoforms of c-Myc gene were constructed by PCR using KOD-plus-Ver.2 kit (KOD-211; Toyobo Life Science) and cloned into pcDNA3.1 with BamHI and HindIII as restriction enzymes. Transfections were performed using Lipofectamine® 2000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, cells (1×105 cells/well; U-2OS and MG63 cell lines were used since HOTTIP was highly expressed in the two cell lines) were seeded into a 6-well plate and incubated at 37°C overnight. Prior to the transfection, the siRNA/plasmid-Lipofectamine solution was prepared by mixing 200 µl MEM separately with Lipofectamine (5 µl) or siRNA/plasmid (2 µg) and then mixing the solutions together. Finally, the siRNA/plasmid-Lipofectamine solution was added into each well, and the cells were incubated at 37°C for 24 h (for plasmid) or 48 h (for siRNA) for subsequent experiments.

Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay and trypan blue staining

For CCK-8 assay, U-2OS and MG63 cells were seeded in 96-well plates (5×104 cells/well) and incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 for 12 h. Subsequently, fresh medium containing 10% FBS was added to the culture plate and 10 µl CCK-8 (Dojindo Molecular Technologies) reagent was added to each well at 0, 24, 48 and 72 h and incubated at 37°C for another 2 h. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader (Molecular Devices). For Trypan blue staining, triplicates of U-2OS and MG63 cells (2×104 cells/well) were seeded in 96-well plates initially, then trypsinized at different time points (0, 24, 36 and 48 h) and stained with trypan blue at room temperature for 5 min; stained cells were counted using a hemocytometer and cell viability ([(total cells)-(blue cells)]x100%) curves were plotted.

Wound healing assay

Cell migration ability was determined by wound healing assay. Transfected MG63 cells were seeded in 6-well plate (3×105 cells/well) for 24 h until confluence was reached. A scratch was made using a sterile 200 µl pipette tip in the central axis of the wells. The cells were washed with PBS and cultured with serum-free medium for 24 h. At 48 or 72 h, the migration of the cells into the scratch was observed under an inverted microscope (magnification, ×200) and the distance between the edges of the wound was calculated.

Matrigel assay

Cell invasive ability was determined by Matrigel assay. Transfected U-2OS cells were seeded (3×104 cells/well) with medium containing 0.1% FBS in the upper chamber of an insert coated with Matrigel and allowed to migrate into the lower chamber supplemented with medium containing 10% FBS for 24 h (37°C; 5% CO2). Cells that invaded through the membrane were fixed by 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min and stained with 0.5% crystal violet solution for 30 min at room temperature. Three replicates were obtained.

Western blotting

Cellular proteins (≥1×105 cells/well; U-2OS and MG63 cell lines) were extracted by using RIPA buffer (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) containing phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). Proteins (~40 µg), quantified by bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology), were separated by 8% SDS-PAGE, transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (EMD Millipore) and incubated with 5% skimmed milk for 1 h at room temperature. The membranes were subsequently incubated with the following primary antibodies at a dilution of 1:1,000 at 4°C overnight: E-cadherin (cat. no., 3195), vimentin (cat. no., 5741), zinc-finger E-box-binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1; cat. no., 3396), Snail (cat. no., 3879), Slug (cat. no., 9585), β-catenin (cat. no., 8480), c-Myc (cat. no., 5605) and β-actin (cat. no., 4970). β-actin was used as an internal control. HRP-linked anti-rabbit IgG (cat. no., 7074; 1:1,000 dilution) was used as the secondary antibody. All antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. Western blot bands were visualized using ECL Western Blotting Detection System (EMD Millipore).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 6.0 software (GraphPad Software, Inc.). All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Experimental results were assessed using paired Student's t-test, unpaired Student's t-test or one-way analysis of variance with Dunnett's post hoc test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

HOTTIP overexpression in OS tissues and cell lines

RT-qPCR was used to detect the expression levels of lncRNA HOTTIP in 25 pairs of OS tissues and adjacent non-tumor tissues. The result revealed a significant overexpression of HOTTIP in OS tissues (P<0.01; Fig. 1A). This was in agreement with the previous reports (23,24). HOTTIP expression was also analyzed in vitro; compared with the non-tumor human osteoblastic cell line hFOB1.19, HOTTIP was significantly upregulated in the four OS cell lines (Fig. 1B). The overexpression of HOTTIP suggested it may serve tumor-promoting roles in OS development.

Knockdown of HOTTIP inhibits OS cell viability, invasion, migration and EMT

siRNA-mediated silencing was used to knock down HOTTIP expression levels in two OS cell lines, U2OS and MG63, as HOTTIP was indicated to be highly expressed in these cells. Individual and simultaneous transfections of two siRNAs against HOTTIP successfully decreased HOTTIP expression levels in the two OS cell lines (P<0.05; Fig. 2A); co-transfection with si-HOTTIP 1 and si-HOTTIP 2 was used in all subsequent experiments. CCK-8 assay revealed that HOTTIP knockdown notably inhibited cell viability compared with the si-NC group (P<0.001; Fig. 2B). In addition, trypan blue staining also demonstrated that HOTTIP knockdown significantly reduced OS cell viability (P<0.001; Fig. 2C).

To determine the role of HOTTIP in OS pro-metastatic processes in vitro, Matrigel and wound healing assays were performed to evaluate the invasive and migratory capacities of the cells, respectively. Due to the large size of MG63 cells and therefore their inability to pass through the holes of the Transwell, Matrigel assay was only performed in U2OS cells. Whereas for wound healing assay, MG63 cells were used since they exhibited higher migration capacity. The results demonstrated that HOTTIP knockdown inhibited cell invasion and migration compared with si-NC transfected cells (Fig. 3A and B). Since EMT is also a key pro-metastatic process, the expression of EMT markers was detected by western blotting. Following HOTTIP knockdown, the protein expression levels of the epithelial marker E-cadherin were upregulated, whereas the protein expression levels of the mesenchymal markers vimentin, ZEB1, Snail and Slug were downregulated in two OS cell lines (Fig. 3C). These results indicated that HOTTIP may have a role in the promotion of OS invasion, migration and EMT.

Reciprocal regulation between HOTTIP and c-Myc

Based on a previous report by Li et al (24), HOTTIP activates the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in OS cells. Since c-Myc is an important effector of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, RT-qPCR and western blotting were used to examine whether HOTTIP regulated the expression of c-Myc in OS cells. Knockdown of HOTTIP led to a decrease of β-catenin and c-Myc mRNA expression (P<0.05; Fig. 4A and B). The decreased expression was also observed in their protein levels (Fig. 4C). Therefore, it was concluded that HOTTIP may promote c-Myc expression in OS cells. Conversely, HOTTIP was upregulated by c-Myc overexpression in the two OS cell lines. The two isoforms of c-Myc were confirmed to be overexpressed (P<0.001; Fig. 5A and B) and increased HOTTIP expression levels (P<0.01; Fig. 5A), compared with cells transfected with an empty vector. Furthermore, c-Myc overexpression promoted OS cell invasion and migration in vitro (P<0.01; Fig. 5C and D). These findings indicate the oncogenic role of c-Myc in OS cells, and provide a reciprocal linkage of HOTTIP and c-Myc.

Restoration of c-Myc in HOTTIP-silenced OS cells rescued OS cell invasion and migration

To test whether HOTTIP promoted OS cell invasion and migration by upregulating c-Myc, c-Myc was overexpressed in HOTTIP-silenced OS cells. RT-qPCR validated the overexpression of c-Myc as well as the induction of HOTTIP expression in the restoration group (P<0.01; Fig. 6A). Furthermore, c-Myc restoration rescued OS cell invasion and migration (P<0.001; Fig. 6B and C). These results suggested that c-Myc may be the mediator of the oncogenic role of HOTTIP in OS cells.

Discussion

Mainly arising from the mesenchymal cells of the long bones, OS is the most common bone malignancy in the world (1). Despite the progress on its treatment options, including surgery and chemotherapy, most patients with OS still experience recurrence and have a short overall survival time (3). Metastasis is the major cause of the unsatisfactory clinical outcome. A recent study has suggested that dysregulated expression of several lncRNAs is implicated in OS progression (16). HOTTIP is among these lncRNAs, and two reports have identified its expression and tumor-promoting activities in OS (23,24). However, the role and mechanism of HOTTIP in OS cell migration, invasion and EMT remain unclear.

Overexpression of HOTTIP has been reported in a number of human cancers; with HOTTIP associated with multiple cancer-associated malignancy phenotypes and signaling pathways, in addition to contributing to cancer development (21). In the present study, higher expression of HOTTIP was confirmed in OS tissues and all cell lines compared to their matched controls. Moreover, knockdown of HOTTIP by siRNAs reduced the viability of two OS cell lines. These findings were in agreement with the previous studies on the role of HOTTIP in OS (23,24).

Furthermore, the present study suggested that HOTTIP may also contribute to the aggressive phenotypes of OS. The in vitro experiments consistently demonstrated that knockdown of HOTTIP inhibited OS cell migration, invasion and EMT, which indicated the pro-metastatic activity of HOTTIP in OS. This was in agreement with previous studies, which have identified the promotion of cancer invasion and EMT by HOTTIP in gastric cancer, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and glioma (2729). In the first report of HOTTIP in OS by Li et al, the analysis of the association between HOTTIP expression levels and several clinicopathological features of patients with OS revealed that high HOTTIP expression was associated with distant metastasis (23). In vitro experiments from the same study demonstrated that knockdown of HOTTIP inhibited OS cell migration and invasion (23). Therefore, the results of the present study validated their findings and verified the promotion of EMT by HOTTIP in OS cells.

The relationship between HOTTIP and the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in OS cells has been described by Li et al (24). HOTTIP overexpression leads to increased expression of cyclin D1, cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and β-catenin proteins, which are the effectors of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway (24). The activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling by HOTTIP is associated with the pro-growth and chemoresistance roles of HOTTIP in OS cells (24). Recently, a study from colorectal cancer revealed that knockdown of HOTTIP inhibited cell proliferation and migration, and significantly suppressed the expression of glycogen synthase kinase 3β, β-catenin and c-Myc (30). The results of the present study demonstrated that knockdown of HOTTIP decreased the expression of β-catenin and c-Myc at both mRNA and protein levels. In addition, c-Myc overexpression increased HOTTIP expression. Thus, HOTTIP and c-Myc may form a positive feedback loop. The reciprocal regulation between HOTTIP and c-Myc may explain the upregulation of HOTTIP in OS, as elevated c-Myc expression may determine the upregulation of HOTTIP. Conversely, c-Myc overexpression may promote OS cell migration and invasion in vitro, which may be related to the pro-metastatic role of HOTTIP in OS cells.

In conclusion, the results of the present study demonstrated that lncRNA HOTTIP was overexpressed in OS and may facilitate migration, invasion and EMT in vitro by forming a positive feedback loop with c-Myc. However, there are still several limitations. Firstly, the oncogenic roles of HOTTIP in OS cells need to be confirmed by in vivo data in the near future. Secondly, the molecular mechanisms governing the reciprocal regulation of HOTTIP and c-Myc remain largely unclear. Finally, HOTTIP may have an impact on OS progression via other pathways. The findings of the present study support that HOTTIP may serve as a promising therapeutic target in the treatment of OS.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

YT and FJ designed the study. YT performed the experiments and analyzed the data. FJ wrote the manuscript. Both authors have read and approved the final version of this manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University (Shanghai, China), and written informed consent was obtained from all patients at the initial stage of this study.

Patient consent for publication

All patients provided written informed consent for the publication of their data.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Yang Y, Han L, He Z, Li X, Yang S, Yang J, Zhang Y, Li D, Yang Y and Yang Z: Advances in limb salvage treatment of osteosarcoma. J Bone Oncol. 10:36–40. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Abarrategi A, Tornin J, Martinez-Cruzado L, Hamilton A, Martinez-Campos E, Rodrigo JP, González MV, Baldini N, Garcia-Castro J and Rodriguez R: Osteosarcoma: Cells-of-Origin, cancer stem cells and targeted therapies. Stem Cells Int. 2016:36317642016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Meazza C and Scanagatta P: Metastatic osteosarcoma: A challenging multidisciplinary treatment. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 16:543–556. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Osasan S, Zhang M, Shen F, Paul PJ, Persad S and Sergi C: Osteogenic sarcoma: A 21st century review. Anticancer Res. 36:4391–4398. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Vos HI, Coenen MJ, Guchelaar HJ and Te Loo DM: The role of pharmacogenetics in the treatment of osteosarcoma. Drug Discov Today. 21:1775–1786. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Bonasio R and Shiekhattar R: Regulation of transcription by long noncoding RNAs. Annu Rev Genet. 48:433–455. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Mercer TR, Dinger ME and Mattick JS: Long non-coding RNAs: Insights into functions. Nat Rev Genet. 10:155–159. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Ponting CP, Oliver PL and Reik W: Evolution and functions of long noncoding RNAs. Cell. 136:629–641. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Li X and Li N: LncRNAs on guard. Int Immunopharmacol. 65:60–63. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Zampetaki A, Albrecht A and Steinhofel K: Long non-coding RNA structure and function: Is there a link? Front Physiol. 9:12012018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Balas MM and Johnson AM: Exploring the mechanisms behind long noncoding RNAs and cancer. Noncoding RNA Res. 3:108–117. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Pop-Bica C, Gulei D, Cojocneanu-Petric R, Braicu C, Petrut B and Berindan-Neagoe I: Understanding the role of non-coding RNAs in bladder cancer: From dark matter to valuable therapeutic targets. Int J Mol Sci. 18(pii): E15142017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Khorshidi A, Dhaliwal P and Yang BB: Noncoding RNAs in tumor angiogenesis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 927:217–241. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Wang G, Liu C, Deng S, Zhao Q, Li T, Qiao S, Shen L, Zhang Y, Lü J, Meng L, et al: Long noncoding RNAs in regulation of human breast cancer. Brief Funct Genomics. 15:222–226. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Li Z, Dou P, Liu T and He S: Application of long noncoding RNAs in osteosarcoma: Biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Cell Physiol Biochem. 42:1407–1419. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Chen R, Wang G, Zheng Y, Hua Y and Cai Z: Long non-coding RNAs in osteosarcoma. Oncotarget. 8:20462–20475. 2017.PubMed/NCBI

17 

Li P, Huang R, Huang T, Cheng S, Chen Y and Wang Z: Long non-coding RNA NEAT1 promotes proliferation, migration and invasion of human osteosarcoma cells. Int J Med Sci. 15:1227–1234. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Xu R, Feng F, Yu X, Liu Z and Lao L: LncRNA SNHG4 promotes tumour growth by sponging miR-224-3p and predicts poor survival and recurrence in human osteosarcoma. Cell Prolif. 51:e125152018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Chen X, Zhou Y, Liu S, Zhang D, Yang X, Zhou Q, Song Y and Liu Y: LncRNA TP73-AS1 predicts poor prognosis and functions as oncogenic lncRNA in osteosarcoma. J Cell Biochem. Sep 14–2018.doi: 10.1002/jcb.27556 (Epub ahead of print).

20 

Wang KC, Yang YW, Liu B, Sanyal A, Corces-Zimmerman R, Chen Y, Lajoie BR, Protacio A, Flynn RA, Gupta RA, et al: A long noncoding RNA maintains active chromatin to coordinate homeotic gene expression. Nature. 472:120–124. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Fan Y, Yan T, Chai Y, Jiang Y and Zhu X: Long noncoding RNA HOTTIP as an independent prognostic marker in cancer. Clin Chim Acta. 482:224–230. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Lian Y, Cai Z, Gong H, Xue S, Wu D and Wang K: HOTTIP: A critical oncogenic long non-coding RNA in human cancers. Mol Biosyst. 12:3247–3253. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Li F, Cao L, Hang D, Wang F and Wang Q: Long non-coding RNA HOTTIP is up-regulated and associated with poor prognosis in patients with osteosarcoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 8:11414–11420. 2015.PubMed/NCBI

24 

Li Z, Zhao L and Wang Q: Overexpression of long non-coding RNA HOTTIP increases chemoresistance of osteosarcoma cell by activating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Am J Transl Res. 8:2385–2393. 2016.PubMed/NCBI

25 

Zhang M, Wang D, Zhu T and Yin R: RASSF4 overexpression inhibits the proliferation, invasion, EMT and Wnt signaling pathway in osteosarcoma cells. Oncol Res. 25:83–91. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Ye H, Liu K and Qian K: Overexpression of long noncoding RNA HOTTIP promotes tumor invasion and predicts poor prognosis in gastric cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 9:2081–2088. 2016.PubMed/NCBI

28 

Chen X, Han H, Li Y, Zhang Q, Mo K and Chen S: Upregulation of long noncoding RNA HOTTIP promotes metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma via induction of EMT. Oncotarget. 7:84480–84485. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Zhang S, Wang W, Liu G, Xie S, Li Q, Li Y and Lin Z: Long non-coding RNA HOTTIP promotes hypoxia-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition of malignant glioma by regulating the miR-101/ZEB1 axis. Biomed Pharmacother. 95:711–720. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Liu T, Yu T, Hu H and He K: Knockdown of the long non-coding RNA HOTTIP inhibits colorectal cancer cell proliferation and migration and induces apoptosis by targeting SGK1. Biomed Pharmacother. 98:286–296. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

August-2019
Volume 18 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Tang Y and Tang Y: lncRNA HOTTIP facilitates osteosarcoma cell migration, invasion and epithelial‑mesenchymal transition by forming a positive feedback loop with c‑Myc. Oncol Lett 18: 1649-1656, 2019
APA
Tang, Y., & Tang, Y. (2019). lncRNA HOTTIP facilitates osteosarcoma cell migration, invasion and epithelial‑mesenchymal transition by forming a positive feedback loop with c‑Myc. Oncology Letters, 18, 1649-1656. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10463
MLA
Tang, Y., Ji, F."lncRNA HOTTIP facilitates osteosarcoma cell migration, invasion and epithelial‑mesenchymal transition by forming a positive feedback loop with c‑Myc". Oncology Letters 18.2 (2019): 1649-1656.
Chicago
Tang, Y., Ji, F."lncRNA HOTTIP facilitates osteosarcoma cell migration, invasion and epithelial‑mesenchymal transition by forming a positive feedback loop with c‑Myc". Oncology Letters 18, no. 2 (2019): 1649-1656. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10463