Open Access

A three-gene novel predictor for improving the prognosis of cervical cancer

  • Authors:
    • Ting-Ting Ding
    • Hu Ma
    • Ji-Hong Feng
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: September 5, 2019     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10815
  • Pages: 4907-4915
  • Copyright: © Ding et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Cervical cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy, the third most common malignant tumor in women worldwide, and the most common malignant tumor among Chinese women. However, despite continuous improvement in medical treatment, the number of cervical cancer cases in China is on the increase annually, consistent with the general trend in global cervical cancer incidence. Therefore, it is particularly important to study the pathogenesis of cervical cancer at the genetic level in China. The aim of the present study was to use the TCGA database to identify potential genetic signatures that could predict the prognosis of patients with cervical cancer and provide evidence supporting clinical genetic intervention in cervical cancer. Primarily, an effective three-gene signature was found that predicts prognosis in patients with cervical cancer. This model can provide prima facie evidence for future assessment of patient risk and prognosis, but further testing is required to improve its accuracy. Our results also suggested that centromere protein M, methionine sulfoxide reductase B3 and Zic family member 2 could be promising biomarkers for the prognosis of cervical cancer.

Introduction

Cervical cancer is one of the most common cancers among women. According to statistics reported in 2018, ~528,000 patients worldwide are diagnosed with cervical cancer each year (1). Global tumor statistics show that cervical cancer ranks fourth in morbidity and mortality among female malignancies worldwide; approximately 85% of cervical cancer deaths worldwide occur in less-developed or developing countries, and cervical cancer mortality in low- and middle-income countries is 18 times higher than in high-income countries (2). The incidence of cervical cancer in China is ranked second worldwide only to Chile in 2015, and its prevalence in younger women is notable; ~93 women die of cervical cancer every day (3). Efforts to prevent cervical cancer, in areas of China with low economy, and to improve morbidity and mortality in patients with cervical cancer requires improvement in global cancer treatment regimens. Despite the increasing popularity of and diagnostic techniques for early screening of cervical cancer, the number of new cases in China is 13.15 million per year, accounting for 28.8% of new cases worldwide in 2019, and shows an incidence trend in younger age groups (35–39 years) (4). The occurrence and development of cervical cancer is affected by various regulatory factors. A study in China and worldwide revealed that persistent infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) was closely related to the pathogenesis of cervical cancer (5). Mutations in some genes, such as p53, p16, and Nm23, may also cause malignant transformation of cells (6). Biomarkers are biochemical indicators that can label changes in systems, organs, tissues, and cells (6). To the best of our knowledge, few studies on cervical cancer genes have been conducted. One of the main limiting factors of better diagnosis and treatment of cervical cancer is the lack of knowledge and determination of effective molecular markers (7). Therefore, the identification of specific molecules has become a research hotspot. The present study explores cervical cancer-related genes based on the original data in public databases and provides novel ideas for early cervical cancer research.

In recent years, as gene chips and sequencing technologies continue to evolve, high-throughput data have burgeoned. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the human tumor-associated Gene Expression Omnibus databases are two large public databases that provide high-throughput data for a variety of diseases, such as lung and breast cancer, for analysis (8). The introduction of TCGA database in 2005 through a new genomic analysis technology deepened researchers' comprehensive understanding of cancer genetics and provides an open dataset to assist with generating new cancer treatments, diagnostic methods and prevention strategies (9). As a publicly funded project, TCGA database aims to distinguish approximate genomic variations in cancer to create a comprehensive ‘cancer genomic profile’ map. Currently, TCGA database researchers have studied a total of 14,551 cumulative cases of >30 types of cancer in humans (such as lung cancer, cervical cancer and colorectal cancer) through large-scale genome sequencing and comprehensive multidimensional analysis. Based on TCGA database, the present study used the R language to mine 654 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in cervical cancer tissues and combined this approach with bioinformatics software and literature mining methods to define the functions and pathways enriched in the DEGs. Combining 304 cervical cancer clinical samples from the TCGA database and analysing the prognosis of the patients, important information for studying the molecular mechanism of genes in the occurrence and development of cervical cancer was assembled and provided novel ideas and targets for the future treatment of cervical cancer.

Materials and methods

Screening of DEGs

TCGA database (https://cancergenome.nih.gov/) was used to download raw sequencing data and clinical information. The standardized datasets were obtained by annotation and integration. Perl (http://www.perl.org/) scripting tools were used to perform integration processing of datasets. Analysis of DEGs between cervical cancer and normal tissues was conducted with the R language package (version 3.5.1; Shengxin Self-study Network); differential expression was defined as a Log2 fold change (FC) of >4 and P adj=0.001). The data for clinical survival times and the expression of DEGs were merged using Perl scripting tools, and the prognostic value of each DEG was subsequently evaluated using the log-rank method.

Gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis

In the present study, a total of 654 DEGs were screened from cervical cancer samples. The 654 DEGs were subjected to KEGG analysis (https://www.kegg.jp/) and GO enrichment analysis (http://geneontology.org). As a result, 195 genes were enriched into the KEGG signaling pathway, and 246 genes were enriched in GO and subsequently visualized to obtain KEGG map and GO map, respectively. KEGG is a database resource for understanding the advanced functions and activities of biological systems, especially from large-scale molecular datasets generated by genome sequencing and other high-throughput experimental techniques. The KEGG database was used to perform pathway enrichment analysis on the identified DEGs. The RSQLite program in the R package was used to assist the transformation of DEGs into Entrez IDs. Then, the enrichment data were visualized using Cytoscape software (https://cytoscape.org/). GO was used to describe gene functions and relationships between these concepts; GO annotations are statements that use the concept of gene ontology to describe the function of a particular gene (10,11). DEGs were uploaded to the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery website (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/) to obtain the gene enrichment results, and the results were then visualized with the R language package as the GO analysis results.

Three-gene signature and risk score assessment

DEGs were screened using single-factor Cox regression analysis using the Survival package to screen out DEGs associated the overall survival (OS) of patients. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to establish a multigene prognosis prediction model to derive three-gene signatures and calculate risk scores as follows: Risk score=Σ βgenei × Expgenei (i=1-N)=βgene1 × Expgene1 + βgene2 × Expgene2 +…+ βgeneN × ExpgeneN (12); where β represents the regression coefficient, Exp represents the risk ratio, i represents the running formula, and N represents the total number of samples. Patients were divided into a high-risk group and a low-risk group according to the median score. The effect of each gene on patient survival was then assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted, and the survival ROC package in the R language was used to estimate the area under the curve (AUC).

Statistical analysis

All the data in the present study were analyzed using R software (version 3.5.1) and Perl scripting tools. Continuous variables are presented as mean ± SD, while categorical variables are presented as frequencies and percentages. The relationship between gene expression and clinical features was assessed using χ2 and Student's t-test. Each risk gene and prognosis gene marker were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and univariate/multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression. P<0.05 (two-tailed) were considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Workflow presentation

A series of combinatorial analysis were used to identify DEGs in cervical cancer and to screen for three-gene signatures associated with cervical cancer prognosis through a variety of methods (Fig. 1).

Screening of DEGs in cervical cancer samples

Data for 304 patients with cervical cancer and for 309 cervical cancer tissue samples were downloaded from TCGA database, however only 301 cases were matched between the clinical data and tissue sample data. A total of three of the tissue samples did not have associated clinical data, and 3 patients with clinical data did not have associated tissue samples; these samples were excluded. The 309 cervical cancer tissue samples included 306 cervical cancer tumor tissues and 3 normal tissues from healthy controls. The detailed characteristics of the clinical data were stratified according to age, grade, T stage, lymph node status and metastasis, as shown in Table I. The results of the differential gene expression in cervical cancer are displayed as a volcano plot and show whether the P- and |log2FC| values satisfied the logic of different tests (Fig. 2). A total of 301 cervical cancer samples downloaded from TCGA database were analyzed for differential gene expression, resulting in the identification of 654 DEGs, among which 239 were upregulated and 415 were downregulated (fold change >4, P adj=0.001).

Table I.

Number of cases and proportion of each clinical feature of patients with cervical cancer.

Table I.

Number of cases and proportion of each clinical feature of patients with cervical cancer.

VariableCase, n (%)
Age
  ≤46154 (51.2)
  >46147 (48.8)
Grade
  G1+G2152 (50.5)
  G3+G4117 (38.9)
  GX24 (7.9)
  NA8 (2.7)
T stage
  Tis1 (0.3)
  T1+T2209 (69.4)
  T3+T430 (10.0)
  TX17 (5.6)
  NA44 (14.6)
Lymph node status
  N0132 (43.9)
  N159 (19.6)
  NX66 (21.9)
  NA44 (14.6)
Metastasis
  M0115 (38.2)
  M110 (3.3)
  MX128 (42.5)
  NA48 (15.9)

[i] NA, not available; X, cannot be determined/data uncertain; Tis, carcinoma in situ.

KEGG enrichment analysis and signaling pathway visualization

Signaling pathway enrichment analysis of the DEGs was conducted using the KEGG database. The 654 differentially expressed genes in cervical cancer samples were analyzed by KEGG enrichment, and the results of 195 enriched genes were statistically significant (P<0.05). The KEGG analysis results showed that the 195 DEGs were significantly associated with 12 signaling pathways (P<0.05; Table II). The top five signaling pathways with the strongest enrichment in the KEGG analysis were as follows: hsa04110 (‘Cell cycle’); hsa04270 (‘vascular smooth muscle contraction’); hsa04115 (‘p53 signaling pathway’); hsa04614 (‘renin-angiotensin system’) and hsa04114 (‘oocyte meiosis’). Next, R package components were used to construct KEGG signaling pathway diagrams (Fig. 3A). The larger the value of Rich factor value, the greater the enrichment. Rich factor=number of differentially expressed genes located under the pathway term/number of all annotated genes located under the pathway term. The enrichment analysis data were visualized using Cytoscape software (Fig. 3B).

Table II.

Significantly enriched KEGG pathway of differential expressed genes.

Table II.

Significantly enriched KEGG pathway of differential expressed genes.

IDDescriptionGeneRatioBgRatioP-valueAdjust P-valueCount
hsa04110Cell cycle22/195124/7469 6.20×10−13 1.32×10−1022
hsa04270Vascular smooth muscle contraction16/195121/7469 8.12×10−8 8.65×10−616
hsa04115p53 signaling pathway10/19572/7469 1.53×10−5 8.81×10510
hsa04614Renin-angiotensin system6/19523/7469 2.04×10−5 8.81×10−56
hsa04114Oocyte meiosis13/195125/7469 2.07×10−5 8.81×10−513
hsa04022cGMP-PKG signaling pathway14/195163/7469 8.50×10−5 3.02×10−314
hsa04080Neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction19/195277/746910.5 ×10−5 3.19×10−319
hsa04914 Progesterone-mediated oocyte maturation10/19599/746924.2 ×10−5 6.43×10−310
hsa04020Calcium signaling pathway14/195183/74692.9 ×10−4 6.86.4×10−314
hsa05412Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy8/19572/7469 5.35×10−4 1.14×10−28
hsa03440Homologous recombination6/19541/7469 6.15×10−4 1.19×10−26
hsa03460Fanconi anemia pathway6/19554/7469 2.67×10−3 4.74×10−56

[i] GeneRatio, the ratio of the number of genes associated with the ID to the total number of genes in the differential gene; BgRatio, number of genes of the corresponding species/the number of genes in the KEGG pathway database containing the corresponding species.

Functional analysis of DEGs via GO enrichment analysis

GO analysis was performed on all 654 differentially expressed genes, of which 246 genes were enrichment and statistically significant (P<0.05). The 246 DEGs were also analyzed for GO term enrichment using the Gene Ontology Enrichment Analysis Software Toolkit. The following GO biological process terms were mainly enriched in the DEGs: Regulation of mitotic nuclear division, regulation of cell division and regulation of sister chromatid cohesion (Table III). The main biological functions of the DEGs studied that are enriched, the number of enriched genes and the degree of enrichment of different GO terms arepresented in Fig. 4A. The DEGs in the top 5 GO terms with the highest enrichment level (the top 5 with the lowest P-value) demonstrated the highest degree of enrichment are shown; the genes marked in red were upregulated, while those marked in blue were downregulated (Fig. 4B).

Table III.

Enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes in the Gene Onotology enrichment analysis.

Table III.

Enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes in the Gene Onotology enrichment analysis.

IDBiological functionCountP-value
GO:0007067Mitotic nuclear division36 1.30×10−15
GO:0051301Cell division39 4.01×10−13
GO:0007062Sister chromatid cohesion21 4.58×10−12
GO:0000082G1/S transition of mitotic cell cycle16 1.12×10−7
GO:0007059Chromosome segregation13 2.74×10−7
GO:0008283Cell proliferation30 3.10×10−7
GO:0000777Condensed chromosome kinetochore14 5.72×10−7
GO:0030018Z disc16 6.73×10−7
GO:0006936Muscle contraction15 1.27×10−6
GO:0005876Spindle microtubule10 2.17×10−6
GO:0000775Chromosome, centromeric region11 2.60×10−6
GO:0000070Mitotic sister chromatid segregation  8 3.42×10−6
GO:0005578Proteinaceous extracellular matrix23 3.98×10−6
GO:0005819Spindle15 4.90×10−6
GO:0000086G2/M transition of mitotic cell cycle16 5.19×10−6
Detection of three-gene signatures and risk scores

Three specific genes were screened using univariate survival analysis and Cox regression analysis, and the significant association of three genes as independent predictors of OS were validated (P<0.05). This three-gene signature comprised methionine sulfoxide reductase B3 (MSRB3), centromere protein M (CENPM) and Zic family member 2 (ZIC2). The risk score for each patient was calculated based on the sum of the weighted expressions of the three genes (likelihood ratio test, 48.04; P=3.484×10−9; n=304; Table IV). The result of the analysis revealed that the higher the risk score, the worse the clinical prognosis. To identify possible genes associated with OS in patients with cervical cancer, Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test were used to evaluate the association between gene expression and patient survival. As shown in Fig. 5, the expression of CENPM and ZIC2 was positively associated with the survival rate of patients with cervical cancer, while the expression of MSRB3 was negatively associated with the survival rate of patients with cervical cancer.

Table IV.

Multivariate Cox regression analysis in a three-gene signature

Table IV.

Multivariate Cox regression analysis in a three-gene signature

GeneCoefExp (coef)SE (coef)zP-value
MSRB30.181341.198820.086082.107 3.51×10−2
CENPM0.451860.636440.16121−2.803 5.06×10−3
ZIC20.111470.894520.05007−2.226 2.60×10−2

[i] Likelihood ratio test, 48.04; P=3.484×10−9; n=304; number of events, 71. Coef, regression coefficient; Exp (coef), risk ratio; SE (coef), standard error, z, ratio of each regression coefficient to its standard error [z=Coef/SE (coef)].

Verification of the regression model and risk degree

Each patient from the dataset was assigned to the high-risk group or the low-risk group based on their risk score. In the present study, the median risk score was calculated to be 1.33 for the 304 patients based on the risk score formula, 152 patients with the score <1.33 were included in the low-risk group, and 152 patients with the score ≥1.33 were included in the high-risk group. The analysis results indicated that the risk score was significantly associated with OS (P<0.05) as a prognostic factor in univariate regression analysis. The results also showed that the risk score was an independent prognostic factor for OS in multivariate Cox regression analysis (P<0.05; Fig. 6A). In addition, the ROC curve and AUC (0.782) analysis results showed high sensitivity and specificity (P<0.05; Fig. 6B).

Discussion

Cervical cancer was reported as the third most common gynecological malignancy worldwide in 2012 (13). In China, the incidence of cervical cancer ranks first among malignant tumors in the female reproductive system (14), and >99% of patients with cervical cancer are infected with HPV (11,15,16). In 2011, the American Cancer Society, the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and the American Society for Clinical Pathology updated their joint guidelines for cervical cancer screening, as well as the US Preventive Services Task Force (1719). It can be seen that cervical cancer screening for the early detection and prevention of cervical cancer is crucial to reduce the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in China. In addition, understanding the pathological mechanisms and finding potential survival-related genes involved in cervical cancer development is a direction requiring diligent study. With the latest developments in biotechnology, an increasing number of technologies, such as gene sequencing, transcriptome analysis, DNA methylation and epigenetic analysis, are being used to study tumor genomes (20). In the present study, TCGA database was used to analyze normal tissues from healthy controls and tumor tissues of patients with cervical cancer to determine the DEGs in tumor tissues. Then, the three-gene signature and risk scores were verified by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis, and the risk scores were found to be significantly associated with OS. It can be concluded that our three-gene signature can predict the pathogenesis of cervical cancer at the genetic level. Therefore, our research results not only provide an experimental background for future experiments on cervical cancer but also provide strong evidence for prognostic evaluation of cervical cancer in a clinical setting.

The three genes (MSRB3, CENPM and ZIC2) were found to function both as risk factors and protective factors. The molecular functions of these three genes in other tumors, will provide a reference for further studies on these genes in cervical cancer. MSRB3 is a member of the MSR family of proteins (21) and plays a vital role in cold tolerance by eliminating methionine sulfoxide and reactive oxygen species, which accumulate in the endoplasmic reticulum during cold acclimation (22). Recent study found that MSRB3 deficiency induces apoptosis in breast cancer cells, lung cancer cells and colon cancer cells through p53-independent and ER stress-dependent pathways (23,24). CENPM, also known as proliferation-associated nuclear element 1, is a protein encoded by the CENPM gene in humans, and is involved in centromere assembly and immune responses (25). Human CENPM is mainly present in immune cells of tumor tissues of leukemias and lymphomas and in tumor-derived cell lines (26). In addition, CENPM participates in the formation of complexes in the nucleoplasm of viable human breast cancer cells outside centromeres (27). ZIC2 is located on chromosome 13q32, and its amino acid sequence is highly conserved; a previous study has found that loss of heterozygosity in the 13q32 region of ZIC2 leads to anterior cerebral schizophrenia (28). It has been reported that ZIC2 is a critical regulator of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus latency maintenance (29). Marchini et al (30) found that ZIC2 overexpression was closely related to proliferation and metastasis of ovarian cancer cells. Additionally, ZIC2 plays an indispensable role in cell proliferation and apoptosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) (31) and hepatocellular carcinoma, and ZIC2 is a potential therapeutic target in PDAC (32). In summary, these three genes play almost completely different biological roles in different types of cancers, however these have not been validated in further functional and mechanistic experiments in cervical cancer.

In the present study, a three-gene signature was established and identified as an independent prognostic factor for patients with cervical cancer. The Cox coefficient based on univariate Cox regression was obtained and established a risk score. In addition, ROC analysis was used to determine the optimal cutoff for classifying high- and low-risk patients. In the univariate Cox regression model, patients with high-risk scores had significantly shorter survival times. The expression of the MSRB3, CENPM and ZIC2 genes was significantly associated with the OS rate of patients with cervical cancer (P<0.05), revealing that these three genes include both protective factors and risk factors. These results indicate that genes play a key role in the progression and prognosis of cervical cancer. The present study has the advantage of using large databases, complete clinical data, and good sample quality control procedures and provides novel ideas for tumor-targeted therapy. The limitations of the present study are that the gene expression level data obtained from TCGA database may not fully represent the expression of MSRB3, CENPM and ZIC2 at the protein level. Subsequent studies require further experiments to validate these results and further analysis, including immunohistochemistry assays. To make the present study more clinically meaningful, it is necessary to study the three target genes and their related signaling pathways via functional experiments; in clinical terms, further association between these genes and the prognosis of patients with cervical cancer needs to be evaluated from clinical data. Therefore, cervical tumor specimens and clinical prognosis information will be collected from The Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University) and verify the results through specific experiments in our hospital oncology laboratory. In addition, the development of biomarkers usually includes the establishment of models such as training sets, validation sets and test sets. This model was not built in the present study as the literature states it is not suitable for small sample data. Since the sample is relatively small, it is not suitable to randomly divide data into three parts for verification when setting up grouping. Finally, statistical analysis showed that the P-value of the survival curves of each group was not statistically significant, and the AUC value of the ROC curve was relatively small. When the sample is small, the criteria for establishing the three models are not enough and the results are less accurate. In conclusion, the present study used TCGA database and found that MSRB3, CENPM and ZIC2 can be used as prognostic biomarkers for cervical cancer, thus providing novel ideas and targets for future research on cervical cancer. This research belongs to the research field of biological information prediction. The main purpose is to provide prima facie evidence for the future assessment of patient risk and prognosis, but further verification is required from further investigation and clinical experiments to improve its accuracy.

In summary, our study shows that the identified three-gene signature can be used not only as a prognostic indicator for cervical cancer but also as a predictor of patient risk. In addition, further validation by functional experiments combined with clinical trials are required, for application of the three-gene signature in clinical practice for the benefit of patients with cervical cancer.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 81360351) and grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81560407).

Availability of data and materials

Data sets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the TCGA database (https://www.cancer.gov/about-nci/organization/ccg/research/structural-genomics/tcga).

Authors' contributions

TTD, HM and JHF conceived and designed the study. TTD and HM conducted the database mining. HM and JHF analyzed data and compiled charts. TTD wrote the manuscript and approved the final version.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Liang B, Li Y and Wang T: A three miRNAs signature predicts survival in cervical cancer using bioinformatics analysis. Sci Rep. 7:56242017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Siegel RL, Miller KD and Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 68:7–30. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA and Jemal A: Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 68:394–424. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Pimple S, Mishra G and Shastri S: Global strategies for cervical cancer prevention. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 28:4–10. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Li H, Wu X and Cheng X: Advances in diagnosis and treatment of metastatic cervical cancer. J Gynecol Oncol. 27:e432016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Bahrami A, Hasanzadeh M, Shahidsales S, Farazestanian M, Hassanian SM, Moetamani Ahmadi M, Maftouh M, Gharib M, Yousefi Z, Kadkhodayan S, et al: Genetic susceptibility in cervical cancer: From bench to bedside. J Cell Physiol. 233:1929–1939. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Guido R: Cervical cancer screening. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 61:40–51. 2018.PubMed/NCBI

8 

Clough E and Barrett T: The gene expression omnibus database. Methods Mol Biol. 1418:93–110. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Chandran UR, Medvedeva OP, Barmada MM, Blood PD, Chakka A, Luthra S, Ferreira A, Wong KF, Lee AV, Zhang Z, et al: TCGA expedition: A data acquisition and management system for TCGA data. PLoS One. 11:e01653952016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Park S, Eom K, Kim J, Bang H, Wang HY, Ahn S, Kim G, Jang H, Kim S, Lee D, et al: MiR-9, miR-21, and miR-155 as potential biomarkers for HPV positive and negative cervical cancer. BMC Cancer. 17:6582017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Oliveira CA, Russomano FB, Gomes Júnior SC and Corrêa Fde M: Risk of persistent high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion after electrosurgical excisional treatment with positive margins: A meta-analysis. Sao Paulo Med J. 130:119–125. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Li Q, Su YL and Shen WX: A novel prognostic signature of seven genes for the prediction in patients with thymoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 145:109–116. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Hou C, Zhuang Z, Deng X, Xu Y, Zhang P and Zhu L: Knockdown of Trio by CRISPR/Cas9 suppresses migration and invasion of cervical cancer cells. Oncol Rep. 39:795–801. 2018.PubMed/NCBI

14 

Li W, Liang J, Zhang Z, Lou H, Zhao L, Xu Y and Ou R: MicroRNA-329-3p targets MAPK1 to suppress cell proliferation, migration and invasion in cervical cancer. Oncol Rep. 37:2743–2750. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D and Bray F: Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 136:E359–E386. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Di J, Rutherford S and Chu C: Review of the cervical cancer burden and population-based cervical cancer screening in China. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 16:7401–7407. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Farzaneh E, Heydari H, Shekarchi AA and Kamran A: Breast and cervical cancer-screening uptake among females in Ardabil, northwest Iran: A community-based study. Onco Targets Ther. 10:985–992. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Moyer VA; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, : Screening for cervical cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 156:880–891. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Huh WK, Ault KA, Chelmow D, Davey DD, Goulart RA, Garcia FA, Kinney WK, Massad LS, Mayeaux EJ, Saslow D, et al: Use of primary high-risk human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening: Interim clinical guidance. Obstet Gynecol. 125:330–337. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Nakada T, Akiba T, Yabe M, Tanaka K, Nakano M, Suzuki M and Morikawa T: Clinicopathological features of thymoma with ring calcification: Case reports. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 23:256–261. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Kim HY: The methionine sulfoxide reduction system: Selenium utilization and methionine sulfoxide reductase enzymes and their functions. Antioxid Redox Signal. 19:958–969. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Lee E, Kwak GH, Kamble K and Kim H: Methionine sulfoxide reductase B3 deficiency inhibits cell growth through the activation of p53-p21 and p27 pathways. Arch Biochem Biophys. 547:1–5. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Kwak GH and Kim HY: MsrB3 deficiency induces cancer cell apoptosis through p53-independent and ER stress-dependent pathways. Arch Biochem Biophys. 621:1–5. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Kwak GH, Kim TH and Kim HY: Down-regulation of MsrB3 induces cancer cell apoptosis through reactive oxygen species production and intrinsic mitochondrial pathway activation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 483:468–474. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Liu C, Zhang W, Yang D and Liu Y: Molecular characterization, polymorphism, and association of porcine GADD45G Gene. Anim Biotechnol. 26:230–236. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Oliveras-Ferraros C, Vazquez-Martin A, Cuyàs E, Corominas-Faja B, Rodríguez-Gallego E, Fernández-Arroyo S, Martin-Castillo B, Joven J and Menendez JA: Acquired resistance to metformin in breast cancer cells triggers transcriptome reprogramming toward a degradome-related metastatic stem-like profile. Cell Cycle. 13:1132–1144. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Hoischen C, Yavas S, Wohland T and Diekmann S: CENP-C/H/I/K/M/T/W/N/L and hMis12 but not CENP-S/X participate in complex formation in the nucleoplasm of living human interphase cells outside centromeres. PLoS One. 13:e01925722018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Sutherland MJ, Wang S, Quinn ME, Haaning A and Ware SM: Zic3 is required in the migrating primitive streak for node morphogenesis and left-right patterning. Hum Mol Genet. 22:1913–1923. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Lyu Y, Nakano K, Davis RR, Tepper CG, Campbell M and Izumiya Y: ZIC2 is essential for maintenance of latency and is a target of an immediate early protein during Kaposi's sarcoma-associated Herpesvirus lytic reactivation. J Virol. 91(pii): e00980–17. 2017.PubMed/NCBI

30 

Marchini S, Poynor E, Barakat RR, Clivio L, Cinquini M, Fruscio R, Porcu L, Bussani C, D'Incalci M, Erba E, et al: The zinc finger gene ZIC2 has features of an oncogene and its overexpression correlates strongly with the clinical course of epithelial ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 18:4313–4324. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Inaguma S, Ito H, Riku M, Ikeda H and Kasai K: Addiction of pancreatic cancer cells to zinc-finger transcription factor ZIC2. Oncotarget. 6:28257–28268. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Zhu P, Wang Y, He L, Huang G, Du Y, Zhang G, Yan X, Xia P, Ye B, Wang S, et al: ZIC2-dependent OCT4 activation drives self-renewal of human liver cancer stem cells. J Clin Invest. 125:3795–808. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

November-2019
Volume 18 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Ding T, Ma H and Feng J: A three-gene novel predictor for improving the prognosis of cervical cancer. Oncol Lett 18: 4907-4915, 2019
APA
Ding, T., Ma, H., & Feng, J. (2019). A three-gene novel predictor for improving the prognosis of cervical cancer. Oncology Letters, 18, 4907-4915. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10815
MLA
Ding, T., Ma, H., Feng, J."A three-gene novel predictor for improving the prognosis of cervical cancer". Oncology Letters 18.5 (2019): 4907-4915.
Chicago
Ding, T., Ma, H., Feng, J."A three-gene novel predictor for improving the prognosis of cervical cancer". Oncology Letters 18, no. 5 (2019): 4907-4915. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10815