
Atezolizumab‑associated encephalitis in metastatic breast cancer: A case report
- Authors:
- Published online on: July 27, 2022 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2022.13444
- Article Number: 324
-
Copyright: © Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY_NC 4.0].
Abstract
Introduction
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which can block the cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) or programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) pathways, have recently played an important role in the treatment of advanced malignancies (1,2). Atezolizumab, an ICI that inhibits PD-L1 to promote endogenous antitumour immunity, has been utilised in the treatment of malignant tumours. However, as ICIs have become more commonly used, different autoimmune side effects known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have become a rising source of concern. Neurological irAEs are seldom documented, and extensive studies show that the prevalence of neurological AEs caused by immune checkpoint inhibitor medication is ~1% (3). Neurological irAEs can cause central and peripheral nervous system damage, resulting in encephalopathy/encephalitis, central nervous system (CNS) demyelination, aseptic meningitis, transverse myelitis, posterior reversible leukoencephalopathy syndrome, peripheral neuropathy, myasthenia-like syndrome, Guillain-Barré syndrome-like illness and myopathy (4,5). Encephalitis is estimated to occur in 0.1-0.2% of patients treated with ICIs (6). To the best of our knowledge, atezolizumab-associated encephalitis has been reported in bladder cancer, cervical cancer, lung cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma and breast cancer (7–15). It is clinically characterized by seizures, confusion, altered behavior, headaches and alterations of consciousness (16). Brain MRI revealed T2 hyperintensities with or without contrast enhancement. Lumbar puncture frequently revealed lymphocytic and leucocytic pleiocytosis, while cytopathology was negative (17). Patients with ICI-related encephalitis generally recovered completely or partially after corticosteroid therapy. The current study presents a case of irAEs in the CNS. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of encephalitis in China closely linked to atezolizumab.
Case report
In May 2019, a 65-year-old female was admitted to Boai Hospital of Zhongshan (Zhongshan, China) with redness, swelling, heat, and pain in the left breast for one month. The patient was diagnosed with infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the left breast via fine-needle aspiration. No metastatic signs were present at first, and stage II disease (18) was indicated from the histological analysis. Six sessions of chemotherapy were administered, the first four of which consisted of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide, followed by two treatments of docetaxel. As the patient did not respond well to docetaxel, the chemotherapy regimen was modified to paclitaxel and carboplatin. The breast tumour was significantly decreased in size after a further three lines of treatment. Due to grade IV myelosuppression, the fourth round of chemotherapy was not finished.
In December 2019, the patient was scheduled for a subcutaneous mastectomy with axillary and subclavian lymph node dissection. Pathological findings revealed multiple metastases to the left axillary lymph nodes and latissimus dorsi. A diagnosis of triple-negative breast carcinoma (rT4N0M1) (19) was made based on the immunohistochemistry results. The patient refused the chemotherapy regimens recommended by the doctors and instead received radiotherapy. After 6 months, the patient was diagnosed with a metastatic tumour of the 9th thoracic vertebrae and left anterior chest using integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography, indicating progression of the disease. At that time, PDL-1 testing was negative. To inhibit the progression of the tumor, doctors decided to begin treatment with atezolizumab at 1,200 mg in conjunction with paclitaxel at 200 mg per dose. Chemotherapy had to be put on hold during treatment due to a lung infection and a urinary tract infection.
The patient became somnolent 10 days after taking a fourth dose of atezolizumab and was admitted to Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine (Guangzhou, China). The neurological examination revealed a disruption in consciousness (Glasgow Coma Scale E1V1M3) (19) but no other abnormal findings. MRI of the brain (Fig. 1) revealed multiple patchy T2 hyperintensities in the bilateral cerebellar hemisphere, vermis of the cerebellum, bilateral frontal lobe, temporal lobe, parietal lobe and occipital cortex. These lesions exhibited hyperintense signal on diffusion-weighted imaging, which was suggestive of intracellular edema. However, when doctors reviewed the previous MRI report from 23 days before, no abnormal signals were found in the brain parenchyma, and the size and shape of each ventricle and cistern was normal (Fig. 2). The appearance of these new lesions confirmed the deterioration of the patient's condition. At that time, the possibility of immune-related encephalitis was considered first, so the patient was administered an intravenous infusion of 10 ml dexamethasone. However, brain metastases and paraneoplastic neurological syndrome were not ruled out. As a result, a lumbar puncture, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture and cytology, viral serologies of the blood and cerebrospinal fluid, and antineuronal antibody detection were all necessary for the diagnosis. However, the patient's physical health rapidly deteriorated and she eventually fell into a deep coma with no response to any stimulus. The heart rate was 140 (normal ranges, 60–100) beats/min and the blood pressure was 150/110 (normal range, 90–140/60–90) mmHg. At that time, the workup revealed a white blood cell count of 3.87 (normal range, 3.5-9.5) ×109/l, a lymphocyte count of 0.39 (normal range, 1.1-3.2) ×109/l, a red blood cell count of 3.63 (normal range, 3.8-5.1) ×109/l, a haemoglobin level of 88 (normal range, 115–150) g/l, a D-dimer level of 7.84 (normal range, 0–0.5) mg/l and a fibrinogen degradation product of 25.52 (normal range, 0–5) mg/l. Importantly, blood oxygen saturation declined to 83% (normal range, 91.9–99%). The partial pressures of oxygen and carbon dioxide were 54.1 (normal range, 80–100) and 53.8 (normal range, 35–45) mmHg, respectively, indicating type 2 respiratory failure. Ventilation with a non-invasive ventilator was provided; however, the patient's condition worsened and cardiac and respiratory arrest occurred. Doctors performed chest compressions, airbag mask-assisted ventilation, medication boosting, stimulated breathing and other symptomatic treatments. The patient and family refused endotracheal intubation or being transferred to the intensive care unit. After a temporary stabilization of viatal signs as a result of a series of rescue measures, the patient was discharged. A telephone follow-up conversation later revealed that the patient had died a few days after being discharged from the hospital.
Discussion
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have a well-documented history of causing neurological adverse results, with an incidence ranging from 3.8-6.1% (16,20). The beginning of neurological irAEs ranges from 6–13 weeks after the initiation of ICI, but they can occur at any time during treatment and even after termination (10,21). It is possible that the central and/or peripheral nervous systems are affected. According to the European Society for Medical Oncology clinical practice guidelines recommended, symptoms of irAEs may be divided into four grades (22). Asthenia, headaches, dizziness, paresthesia or dysgeusia are common symptoms of grades 1 and 2 (22,23). Myasthenia gravis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, chronic inflammatory polyneuropathy, myelitis, aseptic meningitis, encephalitis and posterior-reversible encephalopathy are the more common authentic neurological syndromes in grades 3 and 4 (22,23). Although neurological irAEs are uncommon, they often manifest as serious diseases with a high fatality rate (24). Encephalitis caused by atezolizumab has only been recorded in a few cases as an irAE. To the best of our knowledge, only 9 cases have been reported (7–15). The main information for these cases is shown in Table I.
Table I reveals that atezolizumab-associated encephalitis has been described in bladder cancer, cervical cancer, lung cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma and breast cancer. Furthermore, 3 cases were noted in an atezolizumab clinical study in triple-negative breast cancer (25). The current case is the fifth case associated with breast cancer.
It is possible to draw conclusions based on the clinical symptoms of those cases mentioned in the Table I. First, symptoms of neurological irAEs appeared ~2 weeks after the patients received their first dose of atezolizumab in all cases. Second, the predominant symptoms were a high fever and a disturbance of consciousness. Third, MRI revealed encephalitis symptoms. CSF investigation revealed encephalitis due to an increase in the number of leucocytes, lymphocytes and protein. Furthermore, CSF was negative for bacterial and fungal cultures, as were other associated autoantibodies. Consequently, atezolizumab-associated encephalitis was discovered after ruling out other possible causes of encephalitis using MRI, CSF analysis and autoantibody assays. Fourth, in these cases, steroid pulse therapy has been shown to be helpful. Since atezolizumab-associated encephalitis is rare, it may be seen from the existing case reports and clinical guidelines that the most direct objective index of this rare encephalitis for diagnosis is still uncertain (17). Clinicians rely on an exclusive diagnosis, i.e., a diagnosis of atezolizumab-associated encephalitis after excluding other causes of encephalitis, including infectious, toxic and metabolic causes. Therefore, in the diagnosis, the results of CSF-related examinations are necessary (10). In terms of treatment, timely administration of steroids may prevent rapid deterioration of patients (16).
In contrast to those previously described cases of atezolizumab-associated encephalitis (Table I), the patient in the present case displayed distinct clinical manifestations. Fig. 3 shows the patient's overall course of treatment, particularly the duration of atezolizumab treatment. No discomfort was noted after the first dose of atezolizumab and there was no sign of prodromal infection based on the results of an MRI and a chest X-ray prior to admission. However, encephalitis developed 10 days after the fourth dose of atezolizumab therapy. An immediate loss of consciousness, with multiple T2 hyperintensities in the initial brain MRI, indicated encephalitis. This outbreak of encephalitis affected a wide area, including bilateral cerebellar hemispheres, vermis, bilateral frontal lobe, temporal lobe, parietal lobe, occipital cortex and medulla oblonata, resulting in loss of consciousness and respiratory failure. Although physicians fully explained the patient's condition and treatment plans to the family, they refused to allow further treatments or a full inspection, including the CSF and autoantibody examinations, which accounted for the difficulty in verifying the diagnosis. After ruling out other possible causes, the physicians highly suspected that the encephalitis was caused by atezolizumab.
The precise mechanism of neurological irAEs has not yet been established. In ICI therapies, monoclonal antibodies are employed to block the expression of proteins [CTLA4, PD-1 and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)] and thereby increase T-cell activation against tumours (5). The onset of immune-associated AEs may be more closely associated with anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibody responses than with anti-CTLA-4 antibody responses (26). A post-hoc analysis of a phase II trial assessing the efficacy of ipilimumab as a combination with chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic small-cell lung cancer indicated that the presence of antineuronal antibodies was associated with more irAEs and particularly neurological toxicity (27).
ICI-mediated encephalitis is a medical emergency and a diagnosis by exclusion; it can be present in a variety of clinical manifestations, making diagnosis and therapy problematic. The diagnosis of ICI-mediated neurotoxicities is difficult due to the rich variety of differential diagnoses, which includes tumour progression, paraneoplastic neurologic disorders, metabolic derangements, infections and complications associated with concurrent treatment modalities (21). The present study emphasizes the important relevance of MRI in the early detection of ICI-related encephalitis. MRI is considered to be the one of the accurate and non-invasive tests available to evaluate the changes of lesions in the brain. MRI is also a powerful basis for clinicians to diagnose and make medical decisions in such cases. Complementary examinations are also essential, including a full biological assessment, viral serologies in the blood and cerebrospinal fluid and antineuronal antibody determination (10). Although they were invasive tests and could not give immediate results, the lack of additional examinations to support the diagnosis was considered as a limitation in the present case.
When atezolizumab-associated encephalitis occurs, steroid pulse treatment is used to alleviate brain inflammation, according to current irAE care guidelines (16). After visiting a neurologist, serious cases should be treated with intravenous immunoglobulin and plasmapheresis (28). If the patient and family members in the present study had agreed to active treatment, the patient's results would likely have been completely different. The doctors might have been able to confirm the diagnosis and steroid pulse treatment could have been administered to the patient. Therefore, the manner in which rare ICI-mediated encephalitis can be accurately identified in clinical practice and how to make the most beneficial medical decisions for patients are directions for our future efforts.
In conclusion, as the application of ICIs for treating diverse types of malignancies expands, the occurrence of clinical irAEs will surely increase. Despite an uncertain cause and the lack of focused treatment for atezolizumab-associated encephalitis, doctors are obliged to constantly update their working knowledge in order to appropriately diagnose and manage these cases. Prompt identification and treatment are essential for successful management. Therefore, it is very important to consult experts in order to clarify a diagnosis in a timely manner. Physicians are obliged to decide the optimal measures after carefully examining the severity of the irAEs and the condition of the patient. Since irAEs can affect different organs, a collaborative approach connecting with experts from multiple fields is useful.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
This case report was supported by the Special project of Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Emergency Research (grant no. 2019KT1340).
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Authors' contributions
GC was responsible for the study conception, reviewed the literature and drafted the manuscript. CZ and JL confirmed the authenticity of all the raw data analyzed and interpreted the data and edited the manuscript. ZL obtained medical images (MRI scans) and analyzed patient data. YZ and HZ contributed to the study conception, overall design and quality control. All authors reviewed the manuscript critically and approved the submission.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This case report was approved by the Ethics Committee of Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine (Guangzhou, China).
Patient consent for publication
The patient's family provided oral consent for the article to be published. The Ethics Committee of Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine (Guangzhou, China) approved that oral consent was sufficient in this case report.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Topalian SL, Taube JM and Pardoll DM: Neoadjuvant checkpoint blockade for cancer immunotherapy. Science. 367:eaax01822020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ribas A and Wolchok JD: Cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade. Science. 359:1350–1355. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Möhn N, Beutel G, Gutzmer R, Ivanyi P, Satzger I and Skripuletz T: Neurological immune related adverse events associated with nivolumab, ipilimumab, and pembrolizumab therapy-review of the literature and future outlook. J Clin Med. 8:17772019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pan PC and Haggiagi A: Neurologic immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibition. Curr Oncol Rep. 21:1082019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Darnell EP, Mooradian MJ, Baruch EN, Yilmaz M and Reynolds KL: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs): Diagnosis, management, and clinical pearls. Curr Oncol Rep. 22:392020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Williams TJ, Benavides DR, Patrice KA, Dalmau JO, de Ávila AL, Le DT, Lipson EJ, Probasco JC and Mowry EM: Association of autoimmune encephalitis with combined immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment for metastatic cancer. JAMA Neurol. 73:928–933. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Levine JJ, Somer RA, Hosoya H and Squillante C: Atezolizumab-induced encephalitis in metastatic bladder cancer: A case report and review of the literature. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 15:e847–e849. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Laserna A, Tummala S, Patel N, El Hamouda DEM and Gutiérrez C: Atezolizumab-related encephalitis in the intensive care unit: Case report and review of the literature. SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 6:2050313X187924222018.PubMed/NCBI | |
Arakawa M, Yamazaki M, Toda Y, Saito R, Ozawa A, Kosaihira S and Kimura K: Atezolizumab-induced encephalitis in metastatic lung cancer: A case report and literature review. eNeurologicalSci. 14:49–50. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Robert L, Langner-Lemercier S, Angibaud A, Sale A, Thepault F, Corre R, Lena H and Ricordel C: Immune-related encephalitis in two patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor. Clin Lung Cancer. 21:e474–e477. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yamaguchi Y, Nagasawa H, Katagiri Y and Wada M: Atezolizumab-associated encephalitis in metastatic lung adenocarcinoma: A case report. J Med Case Rep. 14:882020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tatsumi S, Uryu K, Iwasaki S and Harada H: A case of anti-CRMP5 paraneoplastic neurological syndrome induced by atezolizumab for small cell lung cancer. Intern Med. Aug 12–2020.(Epub ahead of print). | |
Nader R, Tannoury E, Rizk T and Ghanem H: Atezolizumab-induced encephalitis in a patient with metastatic breast cancer: A case report and review of neurological adverse events associated with checkpoint inhibitors. Autops Case Rep. 11:e20212612021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Özdirik B, Jost-Brinkmann F, Savic LJ, Mohr R, Tacke F, Ploner CJ, Roderburg C and Müller T: Atezolizumab and bevacizumab-induced encephalitis in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Case report and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore). 100:e263772021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nishijima H, Kon T, Seino Y, Yagihashi N, Suzuki C, Nakamura T, Tanaka H, Sakamoto Y, Wakabayashi K and Tomiyama M: Bilateral thalamic lesions associated with atezolizumab-induced encephalitis: A follow-up report with autopsy findings. Neurology. 98:204–205. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Brahmer JR, Lacchetti C, Schneider BJ, Atkins MB, Brassil KJ, Caterino JM, Chau I, Ernstof MS, Gardner JM, Ginex P, et al: Management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 36:1714–1768. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Velasco R, Villagrán M, Jové M, Simó M, Vilariño N, Alemany M, Palmero R, Martínez-Villacampa MM, Nadal E and Bruna J: Encephalitis induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review. JAMA Neurol. 78:864–873. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Giuliano AE, Edge SB and Hortobagyi GN: Eighth edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: Breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 25:1783–1785. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mehta R GP trainee and Chinthapalli K consultant neurologist: Glasgow coma scale explained. BMJ. 365:l12962019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Trinh S, Le A, Gowani S and La-Beck N: Management of immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: A minireview of current clinical guidelines. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 6:154–160. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Duong SL, Barbiero FJ, Nowak RJ and Baehring JM: Neurotoxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. J Neurooncol. 152:265–277. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Haanen JB, Carbonnel F, Robert C, Kerr KM, Peters S, Larkin J and Jordan K; ESMO Guidelines Committee, : Management of toxicities from immunotherapy: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 28 (Suppl 4):iv119–iv142. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Touat M, Talmasov D, Ricard D and Psimaras D: Neurological toxicities associated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors. Curr Opin Neurol. 30:659–668. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Vogrig A, Muñiz-Castrillo S, Joubert B, Picard G, Rogemond V, Marchal C, Chiappa AM, Chanson E, Skowron F, Leblanc A, et al: Central nervous system complications associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 91:772–778. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Schmid P, Rugo HS, Adams S, Schneeweiss A, Barrios CH, Iwata H, Diéras V, Henschel V, Molinero L, Chui SY, et al: Atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (IMpassion130): Updated efficacy results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 21:44–59. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Das S and Johnson DB: Immune-related adverse events and anti-tumor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Immunother Cancer. 7:3062019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Arriola E, Wheater M, Galea I, Cross N, Maishman T, Hamid D, Stanton L, Cave J, Geldart T, Mulatero C, et al: Outcome and biomarker analysis from a multicenter phase 2 study of ipilimumab in combination with carboplatin and etoposide as first-line therapy for extensive-stage SCLC. J Thorac Oncol. 11:1511–1521. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kumar V, Chaudhary N, Garg M, Floudas CS, Soni P and Chandra AB: Current diagnosis and management of immune related adverse events (irAEs) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Front Pharmacol. 8:492017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |