Primary alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma in the stomach of an adult: A case report

Introduction

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is a prevalent soft-tissue sarcoma comprising striated muscle and rhabdomyoblast cells at different stages of differentiation (1,2). RMS may occur not only in areas with striated muscle but also in areas without striated muscle (3). RMS is classified as embryonal, alveolar, pleomorphic and spindle cell/sclerotic according to the World Health Organisation 2020 classification of soft-tissue and bone tumors (1,2). Alveolar RMS (ARMS) accounts for 31% of all cases and occurs commonly in individuals aged 10–25 years, mostly in the extremities, followed by the trunk or the perineural region (4). Occurrence in the stomach is extremely rare and an early definitive diagnosis is difficult (5). The tumors are highly malignant and prone to distant lymph node metastasis (6). RMS of the stomach is extremely rare, with only four previously published cases (4–7). The reported cases have included epithelioid (4,5), pleomorphic (6) and embryonal (7) RMS of the stomach. To the best of our knowledge, the present study contains the first reported case of primary gastric ARMS. There is very little information on the outcome of chemotherapy and imaging information of gastric rhabdomyosarcoma that has been reported. The present study describes a case of primary gastric alveolar RMS that was successfully treated in Handan Central Hospital (Handan, China). Moreover, the differential diagnosis is discussed in terms of diagnostic imaging.

Case report

A healthy 20-year-old female patient visited Handan Central Hospital in March 2021 with intermittent abdominal pain for >1 month, which was noticeable after meals and gradually worsened, accompanied by melena. The physical examination revealed no specific findings. The iron level was 2.5 µmol/l (reference range, 7.8-32.2 µmol/l). Gastroscopy revealed a 2.5-cm deep ulcer on the side of the lower greater curvature of the gastric body. The ulcer was covered with white moss and the surrounding mucosa was edematous. The biopsy tissue pathology revealed a neuroendocrine tumor. An abdominal enhancement computed tomography (CT) scan showed a thick and ulcerated distal wall of the gastric body bulging into the gastric cavity (>4.5×2.0 cm). A deep depression with poorly defined borders was also evident (Fig. 1A). In the venous (Fig. 1B) and equilibrium (Fig. 1C) phases, the ulcer was not strengthened, whereas the peripheral parenchyma was slightly strengthened. A round nodule with uneven density, slight hypointensity in the middle and well-defined borders was detected beneath the lesion (Fig. 1A). Enhancement scans revealed curved enhancement at the nodal edges. In the coronal scans, the second lesion was poorly demarcated from the gastric mucosa, and the two lesions were connected in the coronal position in the venous phase (Fig. 2). It was difficult to establish whether it was an enlarged lymph node or a tumor protruding from the gastric body. Considering the age of the patient and the present illness, the imaging diagnosis revealed lateral displacement of the greater curvature of the stomach with malignant difficulty.

Figure 1. Abdominal enhancement computed tomography scans (axial sections). (A) Axial arterial phase image showing the thickened distal wall of the gastric body (left long arrow) and an ulcer (left short arrow), and a hypodense nodule (right arrow) below the stomach. (B) Axial delayed-phase image showing mild enhancement (long arrow) and no strengthening (left short arrow). (C) Axial venous phase image showing slight strengthening (long arrow).

Figure 2. Coronal section computed tomography scan showing heterogeneous hypodense nodules below the lesion (arrow), indistinctly demarcated from the stomach.

A laparoscopic-assisted radical distal gastrectomy (Bi II anastomosis) was performed under general anesthesia. Intraoperatively, the tumor was located on the lateral side of the greater curvature of the gastric body (~6×5 cm) and protruded from the body. No mass was observed outside the body. The sections were lightly counterstained with hematoxylin and eosin. Immunohistochemical staining was performed using the horseradish peroxidase complex, and reaction products were visualized by benzidine reaction. The sections were observed using a light microscope at a scale of 100 microns. The postoperative pathology showed small round tumor cells under light microscopy (Fig. 3). Immunohistochemistry showed the following results: CD56, vimentin and desmin, positive; MyoD1, nuclear weakly positive; Bcl-2 and CD99, partially weakly positive; and myogenin, myoglobin, myeloperoxidase, epithelial membrane antibody, smooth muscle actin, CK, chromogranin A, cytokeratin (CK)8/18, CK20, CD30, CD4, synaptophysin, Wilms tumor protein, anaplastic lymphoma kinase and friend leukemia virus integration, negative. The Ki67 positive index was ~70%. A definitive diagnose was difficult and so the patient was initially diagnosed with a gastric ulcer round cell malignancy. However, the specimen was sent to Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University for further testing, where fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) detected FOX01 gene isolation with amplification. The final diagnosis after combining immunohistochemistry and FISH testing results was gastric ARMS. The pathology of the second lesion revealed that it was a lymphatic metastasis. At 1 month post-surgery, enlarged lymph nodes were noted at the left supracostal margin and right supraclavicular region. Pathology revealed malignant metastasis. Therefore, adjuvant chemotherapy was started, and four cycles of 3 mg vindesine + 1 g cyclophosphamide and three cycles of 60 mg epirubicin were administered. Vindesine and cyclophosphamide were administered on a 4-week cycle. Epirubicin was administered on a 3-week cycle. Vindesine was administered on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of the cycle. Cyclophosphamide was administered on days 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of the cycle. Epirubicin was administered on day 1 of the cycle. During this period, the leukocyte-raising therapy was performed against leukopenia due to chemotherapy-induced myeloid inhibition. The patient was eventually discharged 1 month later after the symptoms resolved and is currently doing well. The case is being followed up every 2 months.

Figure 3. Small round tumor cells diffusely infiltrated in the intrinsic muscle layer of the gastric wall (hematoxylin and eosin staining; scale bar, 100 µm).

Discussion

RMS is a malignant mesenchymal tumor that accounts for <1% of all mesenchymal tumors in the gastrointestinal system (8). RMS of the stomach is extremely rare, with only four previously published cases (4–7). RMSs in the stomach are primary tumors, and no cases of metastasis in the stomach have been documented (3). Patients typically present with no symptoms in the early stages, followed by appetite loss and abdominal pain, or with non-specific pressure symptoms in the late stages when the tumor is large. The present case was similar to the cases documented in the literature. The signs of RMS are atypical on CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which makes the imaging diagnosis difficult and the condition easy to misdiagnose clinically. However, CT and MRI are critical in the preoperative diagnosis (the current patient did not consent to an MRI examination), as they can reveal the location of the lesion and they show the relationship between the tumor and the surrounding tissues, and the degree of invasion of the surrounding tissues. Finally, these techniques indicate the recurrence and metastasis risks after surgery (9). Therefore, it is important to raise awareness of the need for imaging for this disease.

According to the present case, the following types of gastric tumors need to be differentiated during the diagnosis of primary gastric ARMS: i) Neuroendocrine neoplasms, which often occur among the elderly, with multiple low-density small nodules (<2 cm) under the gastric mucosa, but with a density that is higher than that of muscle enhancement. The extent of uniform moderate enhancement in the arterial phase is higher than that of the gastric mucosa. Clinical manifestations include increased gastrin secretion and increased PH level. The primary pathological diagnosis of a neuroendocrine tumor, in this case, may be attributed to small round cells and immunohistochemical CD56 expression positivity. Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors are more common than RMS and are easily misdiagnosed as neuroendocrine tumors. This case is that of a young patient with uneven mild and moderate enhancement on a CT enhancement scan, which can be used as a differential point. ii) Gastric stromal tumors, the most common benign tumors in the gastrointestinal tract, are often found in the upper part of the gastric fundus (7). The boundary is distinct with uniform density. Calcification is a common occurrence. In ARMS, there are few ulcers, but the boundary is unclear and the density is uneven. Calcification rarely occurs (10). Therefore, the two tumors can easily be distinguished. (iii) Gastric carcinoma often occurs among the elderly, with stiff gastric mucosa and blurred fat space around the stomach; its clinical manifestations include anemia and cachexia. ARMS often occurs in adolescents with good continuity of the gastric mucosa and no cachexia clinically. These two diseases can easily be distinguished.

In summary, although RMS is extremely rare in the adult stomach, the outcome of a young beneficiary with abdominal occupancy combined with lymph node growth should be considered a possibility, and should not be diagnosed as benign without assessment. The occurrence of distant lymph node metastasis in the present patient 1 month after surgery is consistent with the literature, which states that adult RMS is highly malignant, prone to recurrence and metastasis, and has a worse prognosis than RMS in children (11–13). Pathology is required to confirm the final diagnosis.

In conclusion, the current study presents a rare case of primary ARMS in the stomach. Efforts to increase awareness of the disease should be increased to improve the early clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Miss Shixing Zhao from the Department of Pathology, Handan Central Hospital (Handan, China) for performing the histopathological analysis.

Funding

Funding: No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

SY and XZ were responsible for study conception and design. XZ and ZY performed the collection and assembly of data, including obtaining the laboratory results and medical images. SY and XZ analyzed and interpreted the data. All authors wrote the manuscript. SY, ZY and XZ confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Glossary

Abbreviations

Abbreviations:

References