|
1
|
Overduin CG, Fütterer JJ and Barentsz JO,
Futterer JJ and Barentsz JO: MRI-guided biopsy for prostate cancer
detection: A systematic review of current clinical results. Curr
Urol Rep. 14:209–213. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
2
|
Zattoni F, Marra G, Kasivisvanathan V,
Grummet J, Nandurkar R, Ploussard G, Olivier J, Chiu PK, Valerio M,
Gontero P, et al: The detection of prostate cancer with magnetic
resonance imaging-targeted prostate biopsies is superior with the
transperineal vs the transrectal approach. A European association
of urology-young academic urologists prostate cancer working group
multi-institutional study. J Urol. 208:830–837. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3
|
Borghesi M, Ahmed H, Nam R, Schaeffer E,
Schiavina R, Taneja S, Weidner W and Loeb S: Complications after
systematic, random, and image-guided prostate biopsy. Eur Urol.
71:353–365. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4
|
Loeb S, Vellekoop A, Ahmed HU, Catto J,
Emberton M, Nam R, Rosario DJ, Scattoni V and Lotan Y: Systematic
review of complications of prostate biopsy. Eur Urol. 64:876–892.
2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
Ghani KR, Dundas D and Patel U: Bleeding
after transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy: A study
of 7-day morbidity after a six-, eight- and 12-core biopsy
protocol. BJU Int. 94:1014–1020. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6
|
Berger AP, Gozzi C, Steiner H, Frauscher
F, Varkarakis J, Rogatsch H, Bartsch G and Horninger W:
Complication rate of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy:
A comparison among 3 protocols with 6, 10 and 15 cores. J Urol.
171:1478–1481. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
7
|
Ehdaie B, Vertosick E, Spaliviero M,
Giallo-Uvino A, Taur Y, O'Sullivan M, Livingston J, Sogani P,
Eastham J, Scardino P and Touijer K: The impact of repeat biopsies
on infectious complications in men with prostate cancer on active
surveillance. J Urol. 191:660–664. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
8
|
Rosario DJ, Lane JA, Metcalfe C, Donovan
JL, Doble A, Goodwin L, Davis M, Catto JW, Avery K, Neal DE and
Hamdy FC: Short term outcomes of prostate biopsy in men tested for
cancer by prostate specific antigen: Prospective evaluation within
ProtecT study. BMJ. 344:d78942012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
9
|
Losa A, Gadda GM, Lazzeri M, Lughezzani G,
Cardone G, Freschi M, Lista G, Larcher A, Nava LD and Guazzoni G:
Complications and quality of life after template-assisted
transperineal prostate biopsy in patients eligible for focal
therapy. Urology. 81:1291–1296. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
10
|
Tsivian M, Abern MR, Qi P and Polascik TJ:
Short-term functional outcomes and complications associated with
transperineal template prostate mapping biopsy. Urology.
82:166–170. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
11
|
Pepe P and Aragona F: Morbidity after
transperineal prostate biopsy in 3000 patients undergoing 12 vs 18
vs more than 24 needle cores. Urology. 81:1142–1146. 2013.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
12
|
Raaijmakers R, Kirkels WJ, Roobol MJ,
Wildhagen MF and Schrder FH: Complication rates and risk factors of
5802 transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsies of the prostate
within a population-based screening program. Urology. 60:826–830.
2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
13
|
Chowdhury R, Abbas A, Idriz S, Hoy A,
Rutherford EE and Smart JM: Should warfarin or aspirin be stopped
prior to prostate biopsy? An analysis of bleeding complications
related to increasing sample number regimes. Clin Radiol.
67:e64–e70. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
14
|
Nam RK, Saskin R, Lee Y, Liu Y, Law C,
Klotz LH, Loblaw DA, Trachtenberg J, Stanimirovic A, Simor AE, et
al: Increasing hospital admission rates for urological
complications after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.
J Urol. 189 (1 Suppl):S12–S18. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
15
|
Pinkhasov GI, Lin YK, Palmerola R, Smith
P, Mahon F, Kaag MG, Dagen JE, Harpster LE, Reese CT and Raman JD:
Complications following prostate needle biopsy requiring hospital
admission or emergency department visits-experience from 1000
consecutive cases. BJU Int. 110:369–374. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
16
|
Manoharan M, Ayyathurai R, Nieder AM and
Soloway MS: Hemospermia following transrectal ultrasound-guided
prostate biopsy: A prospective study. Prostate Cancer Prostatic
Dis. 10:283–287. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
17
|
Klein T, Palisaar RJ, Holz A, Brock M,
Noldus J and Hinkel A: The impact of prostate biopsy and
periprostatic nerve block on erectile and voiding function: A
prospective study. J Urol. 184:1447–1452. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
Aktas BK, Bulut S, Gokkaya CS, Ozden C,
Salar R, Aslan Y, Baykam MM and Memis A: Association of prostate
volume with voiding impairment and deterioration in quality of life
after prostate biopsy. Urology. 83:617–621. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19
|
Anastasiadis E, van der Meulen J and
Emberton M: Hospital admissions after transrectal ultrasound-guided
biopsy of the prostate in men diagnosed with prostate cancer: A
database analysis in England. Int J Urol. 22:181–186. 2015.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
20
|
Grummet JP, Weerakoon M, Huang S,
Lawrentschuk N, Frydenberg M, Moon DA, O'Reilly M and Murphy D:
Sepsis and ‘superbugs’: Should we favour the transperineal over the
transrectal approach for prostate biopsy? BJU Int. 114:384–388.
2014.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
21
|
Vyas L, Acher P, Kinsella J, Challacombe
B, Chang RT, Sturch P, Cahill D, Chandra A and Popert R:
Indications, results and safety profile of transperineal sector
biopsies (TPSB) of the prostate: A single centre experience of 634
cases. BJU Int. 114:32–37. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
22
|
Namekawa T, Fukasawa S, Komaru A,
Kobayashi M, Imamura Y, Ohzeki T, Takagi K, Sato Y, Akakura K,
Ichikawa T and Ueda T: Prospective evaluation of the safety of
transrectal ultrasound-guided transperineal prostate biopsy based
on adverse events. Int J Clin Oncol. 20:1185–1191. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
23
|
Penzkofer T, Tuncali K, Fedorov A, Song
SE, Tokuda J, Fennessy FM, Vangel MG, Kibel AS, Mulkern RV, Wells
WM, et al: Transperineal in-bore 3-T MR imaging-guided prostate
biopsy: A prospective clinical observational study. Radiology.
274:170–180. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
24
|
Panebianco V, Barchetti F, Manenti G,
Aversa T, Catalano C and Simonetti G: MR imaging-guided prostate
biopsy: Technical features and preliminary results. Radiol Med.
120:571–578. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
25
|
Kuru TH, Roethke MC, Seidenader J,
Simpfendörfer T, Boxler S, Alammar K, Rieker P, Popeneciu VI, Roth
W, Pahernik S, et al: Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance
imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal
fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer. J Urol.
190:1380–1386. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
26
|
Pal RP, Elmussareh M, Chanawani M and Khan
MA: The role of a standardized 36 core template-assisted
transperineal prostate biopsy technique in patients with previously
negative transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsies. BJU
Int. 109:367–371. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
27
|
Suzuki M, Kawakami S, Asano T, Masuda H,
Saito K, Koga F, Fujii Y and Kihara K: Safety of transperineal
14-core systematic prostate biopsy in diabetic men. Int J Urol.
16:930–935. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
28
|
Kubo Y, Kawakami S, Numao N, Takazawa R,
Fujii Y, Masuda H, Tsujii T and Kihara K: Simple and effective
local anesthesia for transperineal extended prostate biopsy:
Application to three-dimensional 26-core biopsy. Int J Urol.
16:420–423. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
29
|
Merrick GS, Taubenslag W, Andreini H,
Brammer S, Butler WM, Adamovich E, Allen Z, Anderson R and Wallner
KE: The morbidity of transperineal template-guided prostate mapping
biopsy. BJU Int. 101:1524–1529. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
30
|
Hara R, Jo Y, Fujii T, Kondo N, Yokoyoma
T, Miyaji Y and Nagai A: Optimal approach for prostate cancer
detection as initial biopsy: Prospective randomized study comparing
transperineal versus transrectal systematic 12-core biopsy.
Urology. 71:191–195. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
31
|
Li H, Yan W, Zhou Y, Ji Z and Chen J:
Transperineal ultrasound-guided saturation biopsies using 11-region
template of prostate: Report of 303 cases. Urology. 70:1157–1161.
2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
32
|
Pinkstaff DM, Igel TC, Petrou SP,
Broderick GA, Wehle MJ and Young PR: Systematic transperineal
ultrasound-guided template biopsy of the prostate: Three-year
experience. Urology. 65:735–739. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
33
|
Emiliozzi P, Corsetti A, Tassi B, Federico
G, Martini M and Pansadoro V: Best approach for prostate cancer
detection: A prospective study on transperineal versus transrectal
six-core prostate biopsy. Urology. 61:961–966. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
34
|
Symons JL, Huo A, Yuen CL, Haynes AM,
Matthews J, Sutherland RL, Brenner P and Stricker PD: Outcomes of
transperineal template-guided prostate biopsy in 409 patients. BJU
Int. 112:585–593. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
35
|
Ekwueme K, Simpson H, Zakhour H and Parr
NJ: Transperineal template-guided saturation biopsy using a
modified technique: Outcome of 270 cases requiring repeat prostate
biopsy. BJU Int. 111:E365–E373. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
36
|
Dimmen M, Vlatkovic L, Hole KH, Nesland
JM, Brennhovd B and Axcrona K: Transperineal prostate biopsy
detects significant cancer in patients with elevated
prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and previous negative
transrectal biopsies. BJU Int. 110:E69–E75. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
37
|
Yamamoto S, Kin U, Nakamura K, Hamano M,
Nishikawa Y, Takenouchi T and Maruoka M: Transperineal
ultrasound-guided 12-core systematic biopsy of the prostate for
patients with a prostate-specific antigen level of 2.5–20 ng/ml in
Japan. Int J Clin Oncol. 10:117–121. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
38
|
Miller J, Perumalla C and Heap G:
Complications of transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy.
ANZ J Surg. 75:48–50. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
