Daratumumab‑resistant multiple myeloma with extramedullary disease successfully treated with combination elotuzumab, pomalidomide and dexamethasone: A case report
- Authors:
- Published online on: April 3, 2024 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2024.14381
- Article Number: 248
Abstract
Introduction
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a mature B-cell neoplasm characterized by the presence of clonal plasma cells in bone marrow. Extramedullary MM is associated with aggressive disease and poor prognosis owing to its increased proliferation and therapeutic resistance (1). Although the emergence of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), such as daratumumab, elotuzumab, and isatuximab, has dramatically improved the prognosis of MM, the optimal sequence of treatment regimens remains controversial (2).
Daratumumab, an anti-CD38 antibody, reduces the number of natural killer (NK) cells, requiring more than six months for recovery (3). Another monoclonal antibody, elotuzumab, is an anti-signaling lymphocytic activation molecule family member 7 (SLAMF7) antibody that activates NK cells (4,5). Several studies have shown that pre-treatment with daratumumab attenuates the effectiveness of elotuzumab (6,7). To date, there have been no reports discussing the use of different mAbs for MM associated with extramedullary disease. Herein, we report a unique case of daratumumab-resistant MM with extramedullary disease that was successfully treated with elotuzumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (EPd).
Case report
A 66-year-old Japanese male with a history of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and type 2 diabetes was referred to our hospital for multiple osteolytic tumors of the skull, ribs, and ilium. Laboratory tests revealed anemia (hemoglobin, 12.1 g/dl) and increased immunoglobulin G (IgG, 2,866 mg/dl). Serum levels of β2 microglobulin and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were 3.4 mg/l and 182 U/l, respectively. Immunoelectrophoresis demonstrated the presence of monoclonal component IgG κ-type. Urinary Bence Jones protein was not detected. Serum free light chain κ level was 12.2 mg/l; λ level, 3.1 mg/l; and κ/λ ratio, 3.94. Bone marrow aspirate showed 52% infiltration of monoclonal plasma cells. Cytogenetic analysis revealed a normal male karyotype (Fig. 1A) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was negative for del(17p), t(4;14) (Fig. 1B). FISH for t(14;16) was also negative, but gain/amp(1q21) was not tested. The patient was diagnosed with stage II MM according to the Revised International Staging System (8).
Treatment with four cycles of bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone, followed by autologous stem cell transplantation resulted in a very good partial response according to the 2016 International Myeloma Working Group uniform response criteria (9). Thereafter, maintenance therapy was continued with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. Thirty-four months later, although the IgG level was well controlled (548 mg/dl), anterior thoracic pain developed. Computed tomography (CT) revealed new osteolytic lesions in the sternum; therefore, the treatment was changed to daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (DBd) at 16 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15; 1.3 mg per square of body-surface area twice weekly for two weeks; and 20 mg on the day of and the day after bortezomib, respectively (10), resulting in alleviation of his pain and tumor shrinkage.
Fifteen months after the initiation of DBd, severe right-sided chest pain developed, and the IgG level was elevated to 2,266 mg/dl. The lymphocyte count was elevated to 3,072/µl (Fig. 2). Lymphocytes were morphologically normal, while neither lymphocytes subset analysis nor NK cell activity was performed. Serum β2 microglobulin and κ/λ ratio were 4.5 mg/dl and 0.80, respectively. Chest radiography revealed a massive tumor occupying the apex of the right lung (Fig. 1C). A chest CT scan showed a bulky tumor arising from the right rib, extending to the right thorax, and pleural dissemination with lymph node metastasis to the right axilla and mediastinum (Fig. 1D). Neither bone marrow examination including FISH analysis nor biopsy of extramedullary mass was performed due to the patient's refusal. Upon clinical relapse of MM with extramedullary disease, the treatment was changed to EPd (elotuzumab, 10 mg/kg on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 during cycles 1 and 2, and 20 mg/kg on day 1 of each cycle thereafter; pomalidomide, 4 mg per day on days 1 through 21; dexamethasone, 40 mg once weekly) (11), which resulted in expeditious resolution of the chest pain. Notably, chest radiography on day 13 of treatment revealed marked regression of the tumor in the right apex (Fig. 1E), and serum IgG levels rapidly decreased to 492 mg/dl (Fig. 2). Three months after the initiation of EPd, a subsequent CT scan demonstrated disappearance of the disease (Fig. 1F).
Discussion
Even in the era of monoclonal antibodies and proteasome inhibitors, the prognosis in MM with extramedullary disease still remains poor (12,13). In a retrospective study assessing elotuzumab-based regimens for the treatment of extramedullary MM, progression-free survival and overall survival were short (3.8 and 12.9 months, respectively) (14). Here, we present the first case of DBd-resistant MM with extramedullary disease that was successfully treated with EPd.
The mechanism of action of elotuzumab depends on the action of NK cells. Elotuzumab binds to SLAMF7, which is expressed at high levels in both MM and NK cells, and exerts cytotoxic effects by activating NK cells and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) (4,5). In contrast, daratumumab, an anti-CD38 antibody, reduces the NK cell count in peripheral blood mononuclear cells by binding to CD38 expressed on NK cells (15). It takes six months for NK cells to recover in number after cessation of daratumumab infusion (3). These results suggest that continuous elotuzumab may have weakened effects when used following treatment with daratumumab.
Hoylman et al (6) compared clinical outcomes in patients who received either daratumumab before elotuzumab (dara-first) or elotzumab before daratumumab (elo-first) and demonstrated that the response rate to elotuzumab was diminished in the dara-first group, with a significantly longer cumulative progression free survival in the elo-first group. In randomized phase III studies, daratumumab was more effective against relapsed/refractory MM when administered with fewer prior lines of therapy (10,16–18). Furthermore, in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed MM, the ALCYONE and MAIA studies showed that treatment with daratumumab as a front-line therapy produced superior outcomes (19–22). Based on these results, daratumumab is likely to be administered before elotuzumab, and an approach that allows retention of elotuzumab's efficacy is required.
Disease burden, NK cell count, and SLAMF7 expression in myeloma cells have been suggested as biomarkers of elotuzumab response (23). However, these markers are not readily measurable in clinical settings. Recently, a simpler clinical index has been reported to predict response to elotuzumab treatment. This report showed that the median time to next treatment was significantly longer in patients with higher lymphocyte counts (>1,400/µl), non-deviated κ/λ ratio (0.1–10), lower β2 microglobulin (<5.5 mg/l), and no prior daratumumab use (7). In the present case, although elotuzumab was administered immediately after daratumumab treatment, the patient responded well. Interestingly, in the present case, the lymphocyte counts during DBd gradually increased to a level at which elotuzumab was sufficiently effective (Fig. 2). Although the NK cell fraction was not measured in the present case, the increase in lymphocytes during DBd may reflect the existence of abundant NK cells. Furthermore, in a mouse model, DBd treatment enhanced the cytotoxicity of expanded NK cells by upregulating the expression of NK cell-activating ligands, downregulating the expression of NK cell-inhibitory ligands, and promoting ADCC (24). The augmentation of NK cell cytotoxicity by DBd may also contribute to the enhanced therapeutic effect of EPd. On the other hand, elotuzumab has been shown to inhibit myeloma cell growth in vivo through antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis by macrophages (25,26). This mechanism of action of elotuzumab may have contributed to the dramatic response seen in our case.
Overall, the findings in our case suggest that EPd might be a promising strategy for the treatment of patients with relapsed extramedullary MM while on daratumumab treatment. Further studies are required to select a more appropriate sequence of treatment for these patients.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
Funding: No funding was received.
Availability of data and materials
The data generated in the present study may be requested from the corresponding author.
Authors' contributions
MS, NS and SKo conceived and designed the study. MS, NS, JA, TM, SKo, SKi, TF and NO acquired, analyzed and interpreted the data. MS and NS drafted and revised the manuscript, and confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Patient consent for publication
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of case details and associated images.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Glossary
Abbreviations
Abbreviations:
MM |
multiple myeloma |
NK |
natural killer |
mAbs |
monoclonal antibodies |
SLAMF7 |
signaling lymphocytic activation molecule family member 7 |
IgG |
immunoglobulin G |
CT |
computed tomography |
ADCC |
antigen-dependent cellular cytotoxicity |
EPd |
elotuzumab, pomalidomide and dexamethasone |
DBd |
daratumumab, bortezomib and dexamethasone |
References
Bladé J, Beksac M, Caers J, Jurczyszyn A, von Lilienfeld-Toal M, Moreau P, Rasche L, Rosiñol L, Usmani SZ, Zamagni E and Richardson P: Extramedullary disease in multiple myeloma: A systematic literature review. Blood Cancer J. 12:452022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Laubach JP, van de Donk N, Davies FE and Mikhael J: Practical considerations for antibodies in myeloma. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 38:667–674. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Casneuf T, Xu XS, Adams HC III, Axel AE, Chiu C, Khan I, Ahmadi T, Yan X, Lonial S, Plesner T, et al: Effects of daratumumab on natural killer cells and impact on clinical outcomes in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 24:2105–2114. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
His ED, Steinle R, Balasa B, Szmania S, Draksharapu A, Shum BP, Huseni M, Powers D, Nanisetti A, Zhang Y, et al: CS1, a potential new therapeutic antibody target for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 14:2775–2784. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tai YT, Dillon M, Song W, Leiba M, Li XF, Burger P, Lee AI, Podar K, Hideshima T, Rice AG, et al: Anti-CS1 humanized monoclonal antibody HuLuc63 inhibits myeloma cell adhesion and induces antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity in the bone marrow milieu. Blood. 112:1329–1337. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hoylman E, Brown A, Perissinotti AJ, Marini BL, Pianko M, Ye JC, Campagnaro E and Nachar VR: Optimal sequence of daratumumab and elotuzumab in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma. 61:691–698. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shimazu Y, Kanda J, Kosugi S, Ito T, Kaneko H, Imada K, Shimura Y, Fuchida SI, Fukushima K, Tanaka H, et al: Efficacy of elotuzumab for multiple myeloma in reference to lymphocyte counts and kappa/lambda ratio or B2 microglobulin. Sci Rep. 13:51592023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Palumbo A, Avet-Loiseau H, Oliva S, Lokhorst HM, Goldschmidt H, Rosinol L, Richardson P, Caltagirone S, Lahuerta JJ, Facon T, et al: Revised International Staging System for multiple myeloma: A report from International Myeloma Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 33:2863–2869. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kumar S, Paiva B, Anderson KC, Durie B, Landgren O, Moreau P, Munshi N, Lonial S, Bladé J, Mateos MV, et al: International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 17:e328–e346. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Palumbo A, Chanan-Khan A, Weisel K, Nooka AK, Masszi T, Beksac M, Spicka I, Hungria V, Munder M, Mateos MV, et al: Daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 375:754–766. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dimopoulos MA, Dytfeld D, Grosicki S, Moreau P, Takezako N, Hori M, Leleu X, LeBlanc R, Suzuki K, Raab MS, et al: Elotuzumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 379:1811–1822. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Badar T, Srour S, Bashir Q, Shah N, Al-Atrash G, Hosing C, Popat U, Nieto Y, Orlowski RZ, Champlin R and Qazilbash MH: Predictors of inferior clinical outcome in patients with standard-risk multiple myeloma. Eur J Haematol. 98:263–268. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rasche L, Bernard C, Topp MS, Kapp M, Duell J, Wesemeier C, Haralambieva E, Maeder U, Einsele H and Knop S: Features of extramedullary myeloma relapse: High proliferation, minimal marrow involvement, adverse cytogenetics: A retrospective single-center study of 24 cases. Ann Hematol. 91:1031–1037. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Danhof S, Rasche L, Mottok A, Steinmüller T, Zhou X, Schreder M, Kilian T, Strifler S, Rosenwald A, Hudecek M, et al: Elotuzumab for the treatment of extramedullary myeloma: A retrospective analysis of clinical efficacy and SLAMF7 expression patterns. Ann Hematol. 100:1537–1546. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Krejcik J, Casneuf T, Nijhof IS, Verbist B, Bald J, Plesner T, Syed K, Liu K, van de Donk NW, Weiss BM, et al: Daratumumab depletes CD38+ immune regulatory cells, promotes T-cell expansion, and skews T-cell repertoire in multiple myeloma. Blood. 128:384–394. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dimopoulos MA, Oriol A, Nahi H, San-Miguel J, Bahlis NJ, Usmani SZ, Rabin N, Orlowski RZ, Komarnicki M, Suzuki K, et al: Daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 375:1319–1331. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dimopoulos MA, Oriol A, Nahi H, San-Miguel J, Bahlis NJ, Usmani SZ, Rabin N, Orlowski RZ, Suzuki K, Plesner T, et al: Overall survival with daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in previously treated multiple myeloma (POLLUX): A randomized, open-label, phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 41:1590–1599. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sonneveld P, Chanan-Khan A, Weisel K, Nooka AK, Masszi T, Beksac M, Spicka I, Hungria V, Munder M, Mateos MV, et al: Overall survival with daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in previously treated multiple myeloma (CASTOR): A randomized, open-label, phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 41:1600–1609. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mateos MV, Dimopoulos MA, Cavo M, Suzuki K, Jakubowiak A, Knop S, Doyen C, Lucio P, Nagy Z, Kaplan P, et al: Daratumumab plus bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone for untreated myeloma. N Engl J Med. 378:518–528. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mateos MV, Cavo M, Blade J, Dimopoulos MA, Suzuki K, Jakubowiak A, Knop S, Doyen C, Lucio P, Nagy Z, et al: Overall survival with daratumumab, bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (ALCYONE): A randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 395:132–141. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Facon T, Kumar S, Plesner T, Orlowski RZ, Moreau P, Bahlis N, Basu S, Nahi H, Hulin C, Quach H, et al: Daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone for untreated myeloma. N Engl J Med. 380:2104–2115. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Facon T, Kumar SK, Plesner T, Orlowski RZ, Moreau P, Bahlis N, Basu S, Nahi H, Hulin C, Quach H, et al: Daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MAIA): Overall survival results from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 22:1582–1596. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Danhof S, Strifler S, Hose D, Kortüm M, Bittrich M, Hefner J, Einsele H, Knop S and Schreder M: Clinical and biological characteristics of myeloma patients influence response to elotuzumab combination therapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 145:561–571. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Thangaraj JL, Ahn SY, Jung SH, Vo MC, Chu TH, Thi Phan MT, Kwon M, Lee KH, Kim M, Song GY, et al: Expanded natural killer cells augment the antimyeloma effect of daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in a mouse model. Cell Mol Immunol. 18:1652–1661. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kurdi AT, Glavey SV, Bezman NA, Jhatakia A, Guerriero JL, Manier S, Moschetta M, Mishima Y, Roccaro A, Detappe A, et al: Antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis by macrophages is a novel mechanism of action of elotuzumab. Mol Cancer Ther. 17:1454–1463. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dimopoulos MA, Dytfeld D, Grosicki S, Moreau P, Takezako N, Hori M, Leleu X, LeBlanc R, Suzuki K, Raab MS, et al: Elotuzumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Final overall survival analysis from the randomized phase II ELOQUENT-3 trial. J Clin Oncol. 41:568–578. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |