International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.
International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.
Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.
Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.
Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.
Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.
International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.
Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.
Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.
Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.
An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by elevated blood glucose (hyperglycemia), insulin (hyperinsulinemia) and lipids (hyperlipidemia), and it represents a growing global health challenge (1). According to the International Diabetes Federation, in 2024, >589 million individuals aged 20–79 years were diagnosed with DM, and this number is projected to increase to 853 million by 2050, predominantly affecting populations in low- and middle-income countries (2,3). DM is classified into different types, including type 1 DM (T1DM), which is primarily driven by genetic defects leading to autoimmune destructions of pancreatic insulin-producing cells (4). Type 2 DM (T2DM) arises from dysregulated protein, carbohydrate and lipid metabolism due to insulin resistance, impaired insulin secretion or a combination of both (5). Mainly influenced by environmental factors such as diet, lack of exercise and aging, T2DM is notably more prevalent when compared with gestational diabetes or T1DM, accounting for 90–95% of all cases of diabetes (3). The economic and clinical burden of DM is substantial, as patients frequently experience complications, including vascular malformations, cardiovascular diseases, neurodegenerative disorders and various types of cancer, despite treatment with antidiabetic agents such as metformin, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (5–9). These observations underscore the urgent need for early screening and the development of therapeutic strategies for patients with DM who have an increased risk of developing cancer, often diagnosed at an advanced and clinically challenging stage due to drug resistance (10–12).
Numerous epidemiological studies indicate that T2DM is associated with an increased risk for several types of cancer, particularly breast cancer (BC), including early-stage non-metastatic BC and a 20–30% higher risk of invasive BC compared with non-diabetic individuals (13–16). BC is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women worldwide, with >2.3 million new cases and 665,000 mortalities reported in 2022 (17). The impact of T2DM on BC, particularly invasive BC, has been estimated to increase both incidence and mortality by ~20%, primarily due to poor glycemic control, delayed diagnosis, advanced disease stage, poor prognosis and limited efficacy of systemic anticancer treatments such as chemotherapy and immunotherapy (18–20). Furthermore, specific cancer therapies induce insulin resistance in patients with BC, contributing to T2DM development and underscoring shared and overlapping pathophysiological mechanisms between the two conditions (21,22). Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) abundantly generated through non-enzymatic glycation under hyperglycemic conditions, and insulin-like growth factors (IGFs), overproduced during hyperinsulinemia, contribute to tumorigenesis through multiple mechanisms (23,24). In addition to inducing oxidative stress and inflammation, both AGEs and IGFs activate oncogenic signaling pathways, including RAS/MAPK, PI3K/Akt/mTOR (PAM), NF-κB and JAK/STAT pathways, through their respective receptors, receptor for AGEs (RAGE) and IGF receptors, thereby stimulating tumor development and progression via metastasis (25,26).
BC stem-like cells (BCSCs) have been identified in invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), which originates in milk ducts and accounts for 80% of invasive cases of BC (27,28). Generally, cancer stem-like cells (CSCs) are characterized by their capacity for self-renewal, differentiation, motility, metastasis and resistance to anticancer therapies, traits that contribute to tumor aggressiveness and progression (29,30). In various BC subtypes, these small cell populations, representing ~2% of tumor tissue, express a range of stemness markers, such as CD44+/CD24−, high aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity, octamer-binding transcription factor (OCT)3/4 and vimentin expression (31,32).
In the present study, a naturally immortalized cell line, KAIMRC1, derived from IDC tissue obtained from a Saudi female patient established by Ali et al (33) was used. KAIMRC1 was characterized as a stem-like based on the expression of canonical stem cell markers, including CD44+/CD24−, and its tumorigenicity was confirmed through spheroid formation in soft agar (33). Hyperglycemia promotes CSC generation by creating a tumor environment that supports its expansion, tumorigenicity and aggressiveness (34,35). Clinical observations have reported elevated glycated albumin (GA) levels in blood collected from individuals with DM (36,37). The pro-oncogenic effects of GA on triple-negative BC (TNBC) and estrogen receptor-positive BC cell lines have been previously reported (38,39); however, the biological impact of GA on the stemness characteristics of IDC-derived CSCs remains poorly understood. Therefore, in the present study, the tumorigenic response of the IDC-derived BCSC line KAIMRC1 to GA at the cellular and molecular levels was examined, including cell surface and signaling proteins, to identify potential biomarkers for the precise detection of IDC-derived stem-like cells and the development of tailored therapeutic strategies. Bioinformatics analyses were conducted to determine the expression levels of stemness-associated proteins of interest in patients with invasive BC and DM and to evaluate their impact on overall survival.
Mouse primary monoclonal antibodies directed against extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)1 (clone G-8; cat. no. sc-271269), phosphorylated-ERK1/2 (p-ERK1/2; clone E-4; Tyr204 of ERK1; cat. no. sc-7383), OCT3/4 (clone A-9; cat. no. sc-365509) and RAGE (clone E-1; cat. no. sc-74473) were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. Mouse monoclonal antibodies targeting vimentin (V9; cat. no. 790-2917) and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; clone 6C5; cat. no. ab8245) were sourced from Roche Diagnostics GmbH and Abcam, respectively. Mouse monoclonal anti-RAGE antibody (clone 02; cat. no. MA5-29007) and isotype control immunoglobulin (IgG; cat. no. 31235) were purchased from Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. The secondary antibodies, IRDye 680RD (red)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (cat. no. 926-68071) and IRDye 800RD (green)-conjugated goat anti-mouse (cat. no. 926-32210) were provided by LI-COR Biosciences. All other reagents were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. unless otherwise specified.
GA was generated as previously described (38–40). Briefly, bovine serum albumin (BSA; fraction V; 10 mg/ml) was incubated with 0.1 M methylglyoxal (MG) in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 3 mM sodium azide for 72 h at 37°C to induce glycation. Unglycated albumin was processed using the same procedure but without MG. Free MG (unbound sugar) was removed by dialysis against distilled water, using a Slide-A-lyzer® mini dialysis device with a molecular weight cutoff of 3.5 kDa (cat. no. 69550). Endotoxin levels were negligible after purification with Detoxi-gel endotoxin-removing gel columns (cat. no. 20344) and assessment with the E-TOXATE kit (cat. no. ET0200; MilliporeSigma), according to the manufacturers' instructions. As shown in Fig. S1, GA formation was characterized and confirmed by the increase in fluorescence intensity measured using a SpectraMax M5 fluorescence spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices, LLC). Protein concentrations were determined using the Qubit™ protein assay (cat. no. Q33211) on the Invitrogen Qubit 3 fluorometer. To ensure the stability of the GA and unglycated BSA solutions, aliquots were prepared and stored at −20°C until use.
The IDC-derived KAIMRC1 stem-like cell line (Resource Identification Initiative: CVCL_RW19), classified as ER+/HER2− subtype exhibiting stemness features, was cultured in a complete medium consisting of advanced Dulbecco's modified eagle (DMEM) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mM glutamine and antibiotics (100 IU/ml penicillin; 100 µg/ml streptomycin) (33). Cultures were maintained at 37°C in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2. The TNBC cell line MDA-MB-231 (cat. no. HTB-26, American Type Culture Collection) was maintained in complete DMEM supplemented with the aforementioned components. At confluence, MDA-MB-231 cells were passaged every 2–3 days using enzymatic digestion with TrypLE™ Express Enzyme solution, whereas KAIMRC1 stem-like cells were easily detached from the culture flasks. Both cell lines were subcultured at a ratio of 1:2 or 1:3. For treatment, cells were exposed to GA and unglycated BSA at concentrations of 25, 50, 100 and 200 µg/ml in low-serum medium (LSM), consisting of low glucose (1 g/l) DMEM supplemented with 2.5% FBS, for designated incubation periods. Untreated cells served as controls.
The nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD)-dependent ALDH activity colorimetric assay (cat. no. ab155893; Abcam) was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, a reduced NAD (NADH) standard curve was generated by preparing 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 nmol/well NADH standards corresponding to 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 µl NADH solutions dispensed in duplicate into a 96-well plate. The final volume for each standard was adjusted to 50 µl/well using an ALDH assay buffer. Untreated cells (1×106) were homogenized in 200 µl ice-cold assay buffer for 10 min and centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 5 min at 4°C and 50 µl of the resulting supernatant was transferred to a 96-well plate and mixed with 50 µl assay buffer. Subsequently, 50 µl reaction mix was added to each well, and the plate was incubated at room temperature (RT) for 5 min. Optical density was recorded at 450 nm for the samples and their corresponding backgrounds controls at the initial time points (A1 and A1B), and again after 60 min (A2 and A2B). ALDH activity (mU/ml) was calculated using the following equation:
ALDH activity=B/{[(A2-A2B)-(A1-A1B)] × V × dilution factor} where B, represents the amount of NADH generated, and V represents the sample volume.
The tumorigenic effects of GA on real-time cell proliferation, directional motility and invasion were assessed using the xCELLigence Real-time Cell Analyzer Dual Purpose (RTCA-DP) system (Agilent Technologies, Inc.) following the manufacturer's instructions. This label-free, impedance-based platform continuously monitors cellular adhesion, growth and motility by measuring changes in electrical impedance across plates incorporating microelectrodes, thus providing a dynamic and quantitative assessment of cell behavior. For cell proliferation, 16-well E-plates were used (cat. no. 0-060-0890; Agilent Technologies, Inc.) and for cell invasion and motility, 16-well cellular invasion/motility (CIM)-plates (cat. no. 05-665-817-001; Agilent Technologies, Inc.) were used for cell proliferation and motility/invasion, respectively. For the cell proliferation assay, 7,500 cells were seeded per well in the E-plate, which was then inserted into RTCA-DP station. A total of 6 h after seeding the TNBC MDA-MB-231 cells and 24 h after seeding the IDC-derived KAIMRC1 stem-like cells, 100 µl complete medium was replaced with 100 ml LSM containing different concentrations (25, 50, 100 and 200 µg/ml) GA and unglycated BSA. The E-plate was then reinserted into the RTCA-DP station. For the cell motility assay, the CIM-16 plate, consisting of an upper and lower chamber, was prepared by hydrating the upper membrane with serum-free medium and filling the lower chamber membrane with LSM containing effective concentrations 50 and 100 µg/ml GA, which served as a chemoattractant. After the prescribed incubation period and before cell seeding, the CIM-16 plates were placed on the RTCA-DP station, and a baseline impedance measurement was obtained using a cell-free medium. Cells (15,000) were then seeded into each well of the upper chamber. The CIM-16 plates were subsequently returned to the RTCA-DP station, and directional cell motility was quantified based on the electrical impedance changes detected as cells migrated through the membrane. The same experimental approach was applied to assess cell invasion, defined as a motility across a reconstituted basement membrane, using the xCELLigence system and CIM-16 plate, except that the upper chamber was first coated with Geltrex™ LDEV-free, reduced-growth factor basement membrane matrix (cat. no. A1413202). Data acquisition and cell index calculations were performed using RTCA software 1.2.1 (cat. no. 30-060-0890; Agilent Technologies, Inc.), and cell index curves were monitored every 15 min for 72–80 h for cell proliferation and 24 h to assess cell motility and invasion.
Soft agar colony formation assay for IDC-derived KAIMRC1 stem-like cells was performed in 24-well plates, each well containing two layers of agarose (cat. no. 121853; Merck KGaA) in complete medium, as previously described (33). The bottom layer contained 0.6% agarose, while the top layer contained 0.35% agarose. To assess colony formation, IDC-derived KAIMRC1 stem-like cells (20,000/well) were seeded into the top agarose layer. After 2–3 days of incubation at 37°C, the complete medium was replaced with LSM containing GA at concentrations 50 and 100 µg/ml for 72 h at 37°C. Following treatment, the cells were incubated for 2–3 weeks, and fresh LSM containing GA (50 and 100 µg/ml) was added twice weekly. Colonies were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 5 min at RT and visualized under an inverted ZEISS microscope, and colonies containing >50 cells were counted manually.
For the TNBC cell line MDA-MB-231, cells were harvested and resuspended in serum-free cell culture medium to a final concentration of 1×106 cells/ml. An appropriate number of cells (3,000–5,000 per well) were seeded into 24-well plates. After 24 h, the culture medium was replaced with LSM containing GA at concentrations of 50 and 100 µg/ml. Following treatment, the plates were incubated at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator for 1 week, until untreated control cells formed colonies of substantial size (>50 cells per colony). Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 5 min at RT. After removing the fixative, 1 ml of 0.5% crystal violet solution was added to each well and incubated for 2 h at RT. Excess stain was carefully removed by rinsing the plates in distilled water, and the plates were air-dried. Colonies were imaged using a ZEISS microscope, colonies containing >50 cells were counted (41).
IDC-derived KAIMRC1 stem-like cells and TNBC MDA-MB-231 cells (3×105 cells) were seeded in complete medium in 12-well plates and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. The medium was subsequently replaced with LSM and incubated for an additional 24 h at 37°C. Cells were treated with GA and unglycated BSA at concentrations of 25, 50, 100 and 200 µg/ml for the indicated incubation periods (10 min and 48 h). After washing in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline, proteins were extracted by lysing the cells with NP40 lysis buffer. Cell debris were removed by centrifugation at 20,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C. Protein concentration for each sample was determined using the Qubit Protein Assay, and total protein amount was adjusted to 100 or 200 µg for equal protein loading. Protein samples were mixed with an equal volume of 4X Laemmli sample buffer in 1.5 ml Eppendorf® tubes, denatured by boiling at 95°C for 15 min and then briefly centrifuged at 1,000 × g for 7 sec at RT. Samples were resolved on 11% SDS-PAGE gels alongside prestained molecular weight markers. Proteins were then electroblotted onto PVDF membranes, which were blocked for 1 h at RT in Tris-buffered saline (TBS)-0.1% Tween (pH 7.4) containing 1% BSA. PVDF membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C on a rotating shaker with mouse or rabbit primary antibodies diluted in the blocking buffer, targeting p-ERK1 (1:500 dilution), total ERK1 (1:500 dilution), OCT3/4 (1:500 dilution), RAGE (1:1,000 dilution), vimentin (1:1,000 dilution) and the housekeeping protein GAPDH (1:5,000 dilution). Following five washes for 10 min each in TBS-0.1% Tween at RT, membranes were incubated for 1 h at RT with infrared fluorescent secondary antibodies diluted (1:5,000 dilution) in LI-COR Odyssey® blocking buffer: IRDye 680RD (red)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit or IRDye 800RD (green)-conjugated goat anti-mouse (LI-COR Biosciences) with continuous mixing. After washing, protein bands were visualized using the LI-COR Odyssey CLx Scanner, and protein expression levels were quantified using ImageJ software version 1.53e (https://imagej.net/ij/index.html) as previously described (39,42).
The MammOnc-DB database (http://resource.path.uab.edu/MammOnc-Home.html; accessed, 19 September 2025) was used to analyze proteins of interest (43). Gene expression profiles of the genes encoding RAGE (AGER), vimentin (VIM) and OCT4 (POU5F1), were stratified by biopsy type and TNBC status, as well as their associations with 5-year survival in patients with BC, retrieved from the Swedish Cancerome Analysis Network-Breast (SCAN-B) within MammOnc-DB database (43,44). Additional gene expression profiles for these genes, categorized according to three-gene classifier subtypes (HER2+, ER+HER2− and ER−HER2−), were obtained from the Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC) dataset available through MammOnc-DB (43,45). Further analyses were conducted using the cBioPortal database (https://www.cbioportal.org/; accessed, 19 September 2025) (46–48). The dataset ‘Breast Cancer (METABRIC, Nature 2012 & Nat Commun 2016)’ within the ‘breast’ section was applied to assess gene expression profiles of the analyzed genes based on prediction analysis of microarray 50 (PAM50) and claudin subtype classifications (45,49,50). Patients were classified into low- and high-expression groups using the median mRNA expression values (Illumina HT-12 v3 microarray; Illumina, Inc.) for each gene. Corresponding clinical data were downloaded from the database.
Data from Panigrahi et al (51) was retrieved from the Gene Expression Omnibus data repository (GSE202922; accessed on 23 June 2025). Processed RNA sequencing count data were normalized using counts per million (CPM) after trimmed mean of M-values (TMM) normalization (CPM-TMM) method (51).
RAGE was neutralized in the cells by treating them with an anti-RAGE antibody to determine whether GA exerts its effects through this receptor. IDC-derived KAIMRC1 stem-like and TNBC MDA-MB-231 cells (3×105 cells) were seeded in complete media as previously described51 a40). After medium replacement with LSM, 20 µg/ml mouse monoclonal anti-RAGE antibody (clone 02; cat. no. MA5-29007) or 20 µg/ml isotype control IgG (cat. no. 31235) was added. Following a 2 h incubation at 37°C, the cells were stimulated with 100 µg/ml GA for 48 h, which represented the most effective concentration used in earlier experiments of the present study. Protein lysates were then collected for western blot analysis.
All data are presented as the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. Statistical comparisons between the two groups were performed using an unpaired two-tailed student's t-test. For analysis involving more than two groups, one-way ANOVA statistical test followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used to assess statistical differences among multiple comparisons. Statistical outputs for bioinformatics analyses were derived from the SCAN-B and METABRIC datasets within the MammOnc-DB database, as well as the ‘Breast Cancer (METABRIC, Nature 2012 & Nat Commun 2016)’ dataset accessed through the cBioPortal database. Pairwise comparisons for datasets generated by Panigrahi et al (51) were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U non-parametric test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
High ALDH activity is widely recognized as a valuable biomarker for CSCs, particularly BCSCs, because it supports their stemness and self-renewal properties (52). Therefore, ALDH activity was first assessed in IDC-derived KAIMRC1 and TNBC MDA-MB-231 cells to identify the cell line with greater stem-like properties. The KAIMRC1 cell line showed significantly higher ALDH enzyme activity (1.36-fold; P=0.019) compared with the MDA-MB-231 cell line (Fig. 1).
Cell proliferation was monitored using the xCELLigence RTCA-DP system to assess the mitogenic response of stem-like cells. Before examining KAIMRC stem-like cells, the effects of various GA concentrations (25–200 µg/ml) and the expected lack of effect of unglycated BSA on the proliferation of TNBC MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. S2) were verified and confirmed, consistent with findings using the trypan blue exclusion method (38). Thus, using the real-time system on MDA-MB-231 cells, unglycated BSA did not alter cell proliferation at any concentrations tested, except for a significant reduction at 200 µg/ml (0.83-fold; P=0.02; Fig. S2A). Conversely, GA stimulated the cell proliferation rate in a dose-dependent manner that followed a bell-shaped curve characterized by increased proliferation at intermediate doses (1.28-fold at 50 µg/ml; P=0.00009; 1.59-fold at 100 µg/ml; P=0.00024; Fig. S2B), followed by a decreased proliferation at the highest GA dose (0.79-fold at 200 µg/ml; P=0.019; Fig. S2B). This pattern is consistent with previously described activation kinetics of dimeric receptors such as RAGE (38). After validating the biological effect of GA, KAIMRC1 stem-like cells were treated with intermediate doses of 50 and 100 µg/ml of GA and unglycated BSA. Similar to the findings in MDA-MB-231 cells, 100 mg/ml GA significantly increased cell proliferation of KAIMRC1 stem-like cells (1.27-fold; P=0.0076; Fig. 2), although the onset of the KAIMRC1 cell response was observed after 60 h of incubation (Fig. 2) when compared with MDA-MB-231 cell response observed after 10 h of incubation (Fig. S2B). Unglycated BSA did not affect the cell proliferation of KAIMRC1 stem-like cells compared with untreated controls (Fig. 2).
Cell motility, which drives migration, invasion and metastasis, is a key process in cancer progression (7). To evaluate directional motility and basement membrane invasion, the automated xCELLigence RTCA-DP system was employed. In IDC-derived KAIMRC1 stem-like cells, treatment with effective GA concentrations, at 50 and 100 µg/ml, significantly enhanced motility capacity, with a 2.37-fold (P=0.00003) and 1.44-fold (P=0.0096) increase, respectively, compared with untreated controls (Fig. 3). TNBC MDA-MB-231 cells exhibited a similar response, showing a 2.52-fold (P=0.0096) and 1.6-fold, (P=0.03) increase at the same GA concentrations, respectively (Fig. S3). When motility was assessed through a protein-based matrix to determine invasive capacity, GA significantly enhanced invasion in both cell lines, though to differing extents. IDC-derived KAIMRC1 stem-like cells exhibited a marked increase in invasiveness upon GA treatment, with 3.71-fold (P=0.004) and 5.14-fold (P=0.0005) enhancements at 50 and 100 µg/ml GA, respectively (Fig. 4). Conversely, TNBC MDA-MB-231 cells showed a significant increase in invasion, with 1.42-fold (P=0.009) and 1.47-fold (P=0.04) enhancements at the effective (50–100 µg/ml) GA concentrations compared with the untreated controls, respectively (Fig. S4). These findings indicate that IDC-derived KAIMRC1 stem-like cells are markedly more responsive to GA-induced invasiveness when compared with MDA-MB-231 cells.
Colony formation assays were conducted to evaluate the capacity of individual cells to survive, proliferate and form colonies over an extended period in response to GA treatment. In IDC-derived KAIMRC1 stem-like cells, GA treatment markedly enhanced colony formation in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5A-D). Specifically, treatment with 50 µg/ml GA increased colony numbers by 6.77-fold (P=0.0003), whereas 100 µg/ml GA resulted in a 9.01-fold enhancement (P=0.0004) compared with untreated controls (Fig. 5D). In TNBC MDA-MB-231 cells, GA also significantly promoted colony formation, although to a lesser extent (Fig. S5). Colony numbers increased by 1.46-fold (P=0.0097) and 1.47-fold (P=0.00099) at 50 and 100 µg/ml, respectively, compared with untreated controls (Fig. S5).
Previous studies using TNBC MDA-MB-231 cells reported that GA induced optimal phosphorylation of the key oncogenic signaling protein ERK1/2 after 10 min exposure to 100 µg/ml GA (38,40), a finding that was corroborated under the present experimental conditions (Fig. S6). In KAIMRC1 stem-like cells, the optimal duration of ERK1/2 phosphorylation was first determined using the same effective GA concentration (100 µg/ml) across multiple incubation periods (30, 60, 90 and 120 min). Upon GA treatment, ERK1/2 phosphorylation level significantly increased at 60 min (5.70-fold for p-ERK1; P=0.0043 and 5.16-fold for p-ERK2; P=0.019) and 90 min (6.50-fold for p-ERK1; P=0.0037 and 6.62-fold for p-ERK2; P=0.0059) compared with untreated control cells, whereas no significant change was observed at 30 and 120 min (Fig. 6A). Based on these results, 90 min was selected as the optimal incubation period for maximal ERK1/2 activation in KAIMRC1 stem-like cells. Subsequently, cells were exposed to increasing concentrations of GA and unglycated BSA (50 and 100 µg/ml) for 90 min. GA induced a significant, concentration-dependent increase in ERK1/2 phosphorylation levels, with a 1.79-fold (P=0.04) increase for p-ERK1 and a 1.78-fold (P=0.047) increase for p-ERK2 at 50 µg/ml, and a 2.81-fold (P=0.016) increase for p-ERK1 and a 1.97-fold (P=0.037) increase for p-ERK2 at 100 µg/ml, compared with untreated control cells (Fig. 6B). Conversely, both concentrations (50 and 100 µg/ml) of unglycated BSA did not alter ERK1/2 phosphorylation levels compared with untreated controls (Fig. 6B).
To determine whether GA stimulates RAGE signaling, induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and promotes stemness features in BC cells, protein expression levels of RAGE, vimentin and OCT3/4 were examined using western blot analysis. Treatment with 100 µg/ml GA markedly increased the expression of all three proteins in both IDC-derived KAIMRC1 stem-like and TNBC MDA-MB-231 cell lines, compared with their basal levels in untreated control cells. In KAIMRC1 stem-like cells, GA treatment significantly elevated the expression of OCT3/4 (1.52-fold; P=0.02), vimentin (1.79-fold; P=0.005) and RAGE (1.68-fold; P=0.012) compared with the basal protein expression levels in untreated control cells (Fig. 7). Similarly, in MDA-MB-231 cells, GA treatment significantly increased the expression of OCT3/4 (1.67-fold; P=0.026), vimentin (2.07-fold; P=0.022) and RAGE (1.56-fold; P=0.044), compared with control cells (Fig. S7). Treatment with unglycated BSA did not alter the expression levels of any of the proteins of interest in either cell line (Figs. 7 and S7).
Gene expression levels of RAGE (AGER), vimentin (VIM) and OCT4 (POU5F1) were evaluated utilizing data from the SCAN-B dataset within the MammOnc-DB database (43,44). Analysis by biopsy type (Fig. 8A) showed that AGER and VIM were significantly higher in invasive carcinoma (n=7,880) compared with carcinoma in situ (n=147; P=2.2×10−2 and P=3.35×10−3; respectively). Further analysis (Fig. 8B) indicated that patients with TNBC (n=874) exhibited significantly higher mRNA levels of AGER, VIM and POU5F1 than those without TNBC (n=8,332; P<1×10−12). Gene expression profiles stratified by three-gene classifier subtypes from the METABRIC dataset were also examined (43,45). Patients with BC were categorized as ER−HER2− (n=290), ER+HER2− low proliferative (n=619), ER+HER2− high proliferative (n=603) and HER2+ (n=188). Fig. 8C indicates that patients with ER+HER2− low-proliferative tumors had significantly higher VIM and POU5F1 mRNA levels than patients with ER−HER2− subtype (P=4.99×10−7 and P=1.63×10−10, respectively). Comparative analysis of gene expression based on PAM50 and claudin subtypes using the ‘Breast Cancer (METABRIC, Nature 2012 & Nat Commun 2016)’ dataset from cBioPortal (45–50) revealed that P with high VIM expression were enriched in basal and claudin-low subtypes (P<1×10−10), whereas elevated POU5F1 expression was primarily associated with the basal subtype (P=1.75×10−9; Fig. 8D). Survival analysis using SCAN-B dataset indicated that patients with BC with low-to-moderate VIM (n=1,935) or POU5F1 (n=1,935) expression had significantly favourable 5-year survival (P=0.018 and P<0.0001, respectively), whereas AGER expression did not notably affect the survival of patients with BC (Fig. 9).
Panigrahi et al (51) examined 73 patients with BC, including 36 patients with DM and 37 without DM. The diabetic group was further stratified into T1DM (n=6) and T2DM (n=30). VIM mRNA expression was significantly higher in patients with DM when compared with those without DM, with the most pronounced increase in patients with T2DM (Mann-Whitney U test; P=0.003; Fig. 10A). Although pairwise comparisons did not reach statistical significance, a small increase in POU5F1 (Fig. 10B) and AGER (Fig. 10C) mRNA expressions were observed in the diabetic group, particularly in the T2DM counterparts. A correlation heatmap (Fig. S8) illustrating expression profiles of VIM, POU5F1 and AGER across all patients showed marked differences in VIM expression between patients with BC with and without DM. Conversely, no discernible differences were observed for POU5F1 and AGER expression (Fig. S8).
To determine whether GA activates KAIMRC1 stem-like and MDA-MB-231 cells through the RAGE signaling pathway, cells were pretreated with a neutralizing anti-RAGE antibody to inhibit RAGE signaling or with an IgG isotype control antibody as a negative control. Cells were exposed to 100 µg/ml GA for 48 h of incubation. This approach allowed assessment of whether RAGE is required for the cellular response to GA stimulation. As shown in Fig. 11, treatment with GA significantly increased vimentin expression in KAIMRC1 stem-like cells (1.64-fold; P=0.045; Fig. 11) and MDA-MB-231 cells (1.39-fold; P=0.012; Fig. S9) pretreated with the IgG control antibody, compared with untreated controls. Conversely, GA-induced vimentin upregulation was not observed in either cell line when RAGE signaling was blocked by pretreatment with an anti-RAGE antibody (Figs. 11 and S9).
Management of patients with T2DM who develop IDC remains suboptimal, partly because these patients often present at advanced stages and frequently develop aggressive TNBC (11,53,54). Challenges include late detection and the limited effectiveness of currently available systemic treatments, including chemotherapy and immunotherapy (55). CSCs, identified in both TNBC and IDC tissues, have garnered considerable interest in clinical research because they represent a small population of undifferentiated tumor cells associated with tumor onset, metastasis, therapy resistance and recurrence (28). KAIMRC1, a spontaneously immortalized BC cell line derived from the surgical biopsy of a Saudi female patient diagnosed with IDC was previously established and characterized (33). Notably, these cells exhibit CSC-associated phenotypes and CSC markers, including CD24−/CD44+, CD47 and ALDH1 (33). However, molecular evidence associating GA, the most abundant globular circulating glycated protein used as a clinical biomarker for DM (56), to the best of our knowledge, CSC-associated tumorigenesis in BC remains limited. MG was used for the generation of GA however, due to its low expression in TNBC compared with other BC subtypes (57), the biological effects of MG were not investigated in the present study. Thus, the pro-tumorigenic effects of GA on IDC-derived KAIMRC1 stem-like cells compared with MDA-MB-231 cells, a mature and heterogeneous TNBC cell line known to contain a CSC subpopulation were explored (58). A detailed examination of the functional and molecular characteristics of BCSCs under hyperglycemic conditions may help identify new biomarkers and molecular targets, ultimately supporting the early detection and targeted therapeutic strategies for patients with T2DM and invasive BC.
Stemness properties in IDC-derived KAIMRC1 cells were initially assessed by comparing ALDH activity with that of the poorly differentiated TNBC cell line MDA-MB-231. ALDH is a highly active enzyme in both normal stem cells and CSCs, where it contributes to key stem cell properties, including self-renewal, differentiation and drug resistance, and is considered a potential therapeutic and prognostic marker (52,59,60). In the present study, IDC-derived KAIMRC1 cells exhibited significantly higher ALDH activity when compared with MDA-MB-231 cells. However, a previous study reported higher cell surface expression of the CSC-associated protein ALDH1 on MDA-MB-231 cells when compared with that on KAIMRC1 cells (33). KAIMRC1 cells were previously shown to possess CSC-like properties, including robust spheroid formation in soft agar (33). In the present study, the elevated ALDH activity observed in KAIMRC1 cells further emphasizes their relevance as a model for studying BC stemness under hyperglycemic conditions, compared with MDA-MB-231 cells, a TNBC model frequently associated with T2DM-related BC (16).
At the functional and tumorigenic levels, GA significantly enhanced cell proliferation, motility, invasion, colony formation and ERK1/2 phosphorylation in both IDC-derived KAIMRC1 stem-like and TNBC MDA-MB-231 cells, although the magnitude and timing of these responses varied between the two models. In MDA-MB-231 cells, GA exhibited a bell-shaped, dose-dependent proliferation response, with an optimal effect at 100 µg/ml, indicating the involvement of a dimeric receptor such as RAGE. These findings are consistent with a previous study reporting that GA at 100 µg/ml enhances TNBC MDA-MB-231 cell proliferation, migration and invasion, accompanied by increased MMP-9 gelatinase activity mediated through RAGE, using other in vitro cell-based assays such as trypan blue exclusion, scratch wound and Boyden chamber assays (38). In the present study, GA also significantly increased the proliferation of IDC-derived KAIMRC1 stem-like cells, although to a lesser extent than that in TNBC MDA-MB-231 cells, indicating a comparatively slower proliferative rate. This observation is consistent with the well-recognized tendency of adult CSCs to remain in a quiescent phase to preserve long-term self-renewal potential and minimize replication-associated errors (61).
The biological effects of GA on cell motility and, notably, on the ability to cross a reconstituted basement membrane revealed that IDC-derived KAIMRC1 stem-like cells were more responsive than TNBC MDA-MB-231 cells. Although TNBC cells are highly invasive, CSCs are well known for their metastatic potential, and previous mechanobiology studies have shown that they exhibit markedly elevated invasive potential (62,63). These findings suggest that GA may play an important role in increasing CSC invasiveness, a hallmark of metastatic progression and an indicator of tumor aggressiveness. Additionally, a BC invasion scoring model was recently developed to predict tumor aggressiveness, therapeutic response and prognosis by analyzing the PAM pathway (64). Phosphorylation of p70S6K1, the downstream effector of the PAM pathway, was detected in IDC tissues from patients with T2DM, and pharmacological inhibition of p70S6K1 using PF-4708671 suppressed GA-induced invasion in TNBC (14,40). These findings indicate that additional modeling of PAM/p70S6K1 pathway in patients with T2DM diagnosed with IDC or TNBC may help refine predictions of clinical outcomes, including recurrence and therapeutic responses.
From a tumorigenic standpoint, the present findings reveal that GA significantly enhanced colony-forming ability in both KAIMRC1 stem-like cells and MDA-MB-231 cells. The clonogenic assay is a quantitative in vitro method used to evaluate the capacity of a single cell to undergo clonal expansion and form a colony, thereby reflecting tumorigenic potential (65,66). In the present study, treatment with GA produced more colonies in KAIMRC1 stem-like cells when compared with that in the more differentiated MDA-MB-231 cells, indicating a potent tumorigenic effect in CSCs-enriched cells. Consistent with these findings, a commercial AGE-BSA at 40–80 µg/ml promoted colony formation in human primary TNBC cells (67). Additionally, several AGEs-BSA preparations, including MG-derived AGEs, have been shown to exert pro-tumorigenic effects in prostate cancer cells and xenografts mouse models, accompanied by RAGE overexpression and increased levels of EMT markers, including N-cadherin and vimentin (68). Verification of the tumorigenic potential of GA on IDC-derived KAIMRC1 stem-like cells could be strengthened using in vivo models, such as xenografts mouse models.
Focusing on the main signaling oncoprotein ERK1/2, GA was shown to transiently activate the ERK1/2 signaling pathway in TNBC MDA-MB-231 cells and IDC-derived KAIMRC1 stem-like cells. Previous studies reported that, in MDA-MB-231 cells, ERK1/2 phosphorylation peaks rapidly, ~10 min posttreatment with an effective concentration of GA, and exhibits a characteristic bell-shaped response, indicating the involvement of the dimeric receptor RAGE (38,40). Additional in vitro studies have confirmed that ERK signaling is a key component of the AGEs-RAGE axis promoting carcinogenesis (67,69,70). In contrast to the rapid response observed in MDA-MB-231 cells, KAIMRC1 stem-like cells exhibited delayed ERK1/2 activation, with phosphorylation significantly increasing only after 60–90 min of treatment with GA. Notably, stem-like cells, including those exhibiting mesenchymal features, often show altered sensitivity to external stimuli due to their unique epigenetic and signaling profiles (71,72). Therefore, the delayed phosphorylation response in KAIMRC1 stem-like cells may reflect differences from mature cancer cells in membrane receptor expression, intracellular signaling dynamics or metabolic activity.
The regulatory role of GA in key stemness markers, such as OCT3/4 and vimentin, was also examined. The present results revealed that treatment with GA induced a significant upregulation of mesenchymal markers OCT3/4 and vimentin in both IDC-derived KAIMRC1 stem-like cells and TNBC MDA-MB-231 cells compared with untreated controls. These findings are consistent with clinical reports indicating that T2DM promotes differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), particularly adipose tissue-derived MSCs, generating MSC-derived extracellular vesicles in the blood circulation, that contribute to BC metastasis (73,74). In vivo experimental evidence from diabetic mouse models has similarly shown that hyperglycemia induces a mesenchymal phenotype in BC cells, thereby increasing their motility and invasive potential (75). OCT3/4 is a transcription factor that plays a key role in expressing and maintaining pluripotency and self-renewal (76). Reactivation of OCT3/4 expression has been observed in several human BC cell lines but not in non-malignant cells (77). Notably, previous studies have shown that OCT4 expression in CSC promotes colony formation, metastasis and cancer progression, as shown in human cervical and liver cancer models (78,79). Consistent with these findings, the present data suggest that GA-induced elevation of OCT3/4 may mediate greater enhancement of colony formation in KAIMRC1 stem-like cells when compared with that in MDA-MB-231 cells. Vimentin, a pivotal cytoskeletal protein typically associated with mesenchymal cells, is a key marker of EMT (80). EMT mechanisms are essential for improving cancer cell invasion and migration, which are key factors influencing metastatic potential (81). In the present study, GA-induced vimentin overexpression coincided with augmented invasiveness and motility in both cell lines. Furthermore, elevated vimentin expression was observed in patients with TNBC and in ER+/HER2− subtypes, including the cellular model KAIMRC1, associating with poor-prognosis in patients with T2DM diagnosed with BC compared with those without DM. These findings corroborate previous clinical studies reporting that vimentin is a poor prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in patients with BC and TNBC, primarily due to its involvement in tumor progression and metastasis (82,83).
Furthermore, using the invasive BC cell line SK-BR3, metformin was shown to suppress vimentin expression (84). It would therefore be beneficial to monitor vimentin expression in patients with T2DM diagnosed with invasive BC and determine overall survival. Importantly, RAGE neutralization significantly inhibited GA-induced enhancement of vimentin expression, indicating that RAGE is an important mediator of GA-driven EMT and potentially stemness-related phenotypes. This observation aligns with prior evidence suggesting that AGEs, particularly GA, modulate EMT processes through RAGE-dependent mechanisms (26). Other research tools such as small interfering RNA technology could be applied to verify and strengthen the key role of RAGE signaling in GA-induced vimentin expression. Additionally, an in silico analysis of the publicly available gene expression data from Panigrahi et al (51) was conducted on 36 patients with DM and 37 without DM. The small sample size may constrain the ability to draw statistically significant or clinically meaningful conclusions, particularly when considering potential confounding factors such as disease duration, severity, HbA1c levels and treatment regimens. To the best of our knowledge, no other publicly available diabetic BC datasets of sufficient sample size exist to allow further in silico validation. Despite this limitation, the analyzed dataset offers valuable preliminary insights that warrant further exploration. These findings underscore the importance of monitoring the gene expression levels of VIM, POU5F1 and AGER in local Saudi cohorts of patients with BC and with DM.
In conclusion, the present study showed that GA stimulates key tumorigenic and stemness-associated properties in IDC-derived KAIMRC stem-like cells and TNBC MDA-MB-231 cells, representing in vitro models of BC subtypes prevalent in patients with T2DM. GA primarily promotes proliferation in the poorly differentiated MDA-MB-231 cell line, while concurrently enhancing stemness-associated features, motility, invasiveness and EMT in the KAIMRC1 stem-like cell line. These effects are mediated through the RAGE signaling pathway, as evidenced by the reduction in GA-induced vimentin upregulation following RAGE neutralization. Bioinformatics analyses further indicate that low vimentin expression is associated with improved overall survival in patients with T2DM and BC. Although additional in vitro studies in primary IDC-derived BC cells are warranted, these findings highlight the AGEs-RAGE axis as a key mechanism linking hyperglycemia to enhanced stemness in IDC-derived BCSCs and TNBC. Notably, vimentin emerges as a potential prognostic biomarker, and targeting the AGEs-RAGE pathway may represent a viable therapeutic strategy. Further clinical research on the impact of VIM transcript levels and their associations with overall survival in patients with T2DM with invasive BC is necessary to validate its prognostic utility.
Not applicable.
This work was supported by King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (grant no. SP24R/018/01).
SMN conceived and conducted the study. SMN and RaA supervised the study, analysed and interpreted the data, and reviewed the manuscript. MA, NA, SH, ReA and RiA performed the experiments, generated the data, collected the data and reviewed the manuscript. MKA and AA carried out bioinformatics analyses. MA, MKA, AAA and SMN interpreted the data, wrote and reviewed the manuscript. SMN and MKA confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The data generated in the present study may be requested from the corresponding author.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
|
AGEs |
advanced glycation end products |
|
ALDH |
aldehyde dehydrogenase |
|
BC |
breast cancer |
|
BSA |
bovine serum albumin |
|
CIM |
cellular invasion/migration |
|
CPM |
counts per million |
|
CSC |
cancer stem-like cells |
|
DM |
diabetes mellitus |
|
DMEM |
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium |
|
EMT |
epithelial-mesenchymal transition |
|
ERK |
extracellular signal-regulated kinase |
|
GA |
glycated albumin |
|
GAPDH |
glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase |
|
IDC |
invasive ductal carcinoma |
|
IgG |
immunoglobulin G |
|
IGF |
insulin-like growth factor |
|
LSM |
low-serum medium |
|
METABRIC |
molecular taxonomy of breast cancer international consortium |
|
MG |
methylglyoxal |
|
NAD |
nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide |
|
OCT |
octamer-binding transcription factor |
|
p |
phosphorylated |
|
PAM |
PI3K/Akt/mTOR |
|
PAM50 |
prediction analysis of microarray 50 |
|
RAGE |
receptor for advanced glycation end products |
|
RT |
room temperature |
|
RTCA-DP |
Real-time Cell Analyzer Dual Purpose |
|
SCAN-B |
Swedish Cancerome Analysis Network-Breast |
|
T1DM |
type 1 diabetes mellitus |
|
T2DM |
type 2 diabetes mellitus |
|
TBS |
Tris-buffered saline |
|
TMM |
Trimmed Mean of M-values |
|
TNBC |
triple-negative breast cancer |
|
Lu X, Xie Q, Pan X, Zhang R, Zhang X, Peng G, Zhang Y, Shen S and Tong N: Type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults: Pathogenesis, prevention and therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 9:2622024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
IDF Diabetes Atlas 2025 (IDF), . IDF, Brussels. 2025.https://diabetesatlas.org/resources/idf–diabetes–-atlas–2025/ | |
|
GBD 2021 Diabetes Collaborators, . Global, regional, and national burden of diabetes from 1990 to 2021, with projections of prevalence to 2050: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021. Lancet. 402:203–234. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Robertson CC, Elgamal RM, Henry-Kanarek BA, Arvan P, Chen S, Dhawan S, Eizirik DL, Kaddis JS, Vahedi G, Parker SCJ, et al: Untangling the genetics of beta cell dysfunction and death in type 1 diabetes. Mol Metab. 86:1019732024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Młynarska E, Czarnik W, Dzieża N, Jędraszak W, Majchrowicz G, Prusinowski F, Stabrawa M, Rysz J and Franczyk B: Type 2 diabetes mellitus: New pathogenetic mechanisms, treatment and the most important complications. Int J Mol Sci. 26:10942025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Petrović N, Milosavljević M, Gojak R, Ðešević M, Lakić D, Stević I and Janković S: Costs of treating type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications. Biotechnol Biotchnol Equip. 38:23999412024. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Zhang YY, Li YJ, Xue CD, Li S, Gao ZN and Qin KR: Effects of T2DM on cancer progression: Pivotal precipitating factors and underlying mechanisms. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 15:13960222024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Alshammari AM, Elnaem MH and Ong SC: Evaluating the economic impact of diabetes mellitus: A hospital-centric cost analysis in Hail, Saudi Arabia. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 17:473–484. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wen S, Yuan Y, Li Y, Xu C, Chen L, Ren Y, Wang C, He Y, Li X, Gong M, et al: The effects of non-insulin anti-diabetic medications on the diabetic microvascular complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. BMC Endocr Disord. 25:1792025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Hao Q, Huang Z, Li Q, Liu D, Wang P, Wang K, Li J, Cao W, Deng W, Wu K, et al: A novel metabolic reprogramming strategy for the treatment of diabetes-associated breast cancer. Adv Sci (Weinh). 9:e21023032022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lu Y, Hajjar A, Cryns VL, Trentham-Dietz A, Gangnon RE, Heckman-Stoddard BM and Alagoz O: Breast cancer risk for women with diabetes and the impact of metformin: A meta-analysis. Cancer Med. 12:11703–11718. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kounatidis D, Vallianou NG, Karampela I, Rebelos E, Kouveletsou M, Dalopoulos V, Koufopoulos P, Diakoumopoulou E, Tentolouris N and Dalamaga M: Anti-diabetic therapies and cancer: From bench to bedside. Biomolecules. 14:14792024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Vulichi SR, Runthala A, Begari N, Rupak K, Chunduri VR, Kapur S, Chippada AR and Sistla DSM: Type-2 diabetes mellitus-associated cancer risk: In pursuit of understanding the possible link. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 16:1025912022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Matou-Nasri S, Aldawood M, Alanazi F and Khan AL: Updates on triple-negative breast cancer in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: From risk factors to diagnosis, biomarkers and therapy. Diagnostics (Basel). 13:23902023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Durrani IA, John P, Bhatti A and Khan JS: Network medicine based approach for identifying the type 2 diabetes, osteoarthritis and triple negative breast cancer interactome: Finding the hub of hub genes. Heliyon. 10:e366502024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Liu L, Gao Y, Liu P, Hui R and Zhang J: Association of type 2 diabetes mellitus with histopathological features of non-metastatic breast cancer in Chinese women: A retrospective Cross-sectional study. Sci Rep. 15:286452025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I and Jemal A: Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 countries in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 74:229–263. 2024.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lawrenson R, Lao C, Stanley J, Teng A, Kuper-Hommel M, Campbell I, Krebs J, Sika-Paotonu D, Koea J, Meredith I and Gurney J: Does diabetes affect breast cancer survival? Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 7:e20402024.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Natalicchio A, Marrano N, Montagnani M, Gallo M, Faggiano A, Zatelli MC, Argentiero A, Del Re M, D'Oronzo S, Fogli S, et al: Glycemic control and cancer outcomes in oncologic patients with diabetes: An Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM), Italian Association of Medical Diabetologists (AMD), Italian Society of Diabetology (SID), Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE), Italian Society of Pharmacology (SIF) multidisciplinary critical view. J Endocrinol Invest. 47:2915–2928. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sears AJ, Wild SH, Mesa-Eguiagaray I, Hall PS and Figueroa JD: Breast cancer survival and mortality among women with type 2 diabetes: A retrospective cohort study. Sci Rep. 15:261442025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Jordt N, Kjærgaard KA, Thomsen RW, Borgquist S and Cronin-Fenton D: Breast cancer and incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 202:11–22. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ahmed SBM, Radwan N, Amer S, Sharif-Askari NS, Mahdami A, Samara KA, Halwani R and Jelinek HF: Assessing the link between diabetic metabolic dysregulation and breast cancer progression. Int J Mol Sci. 24:118162023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhang AMY, Xia YH, Lin JSH, Chu KH, Wang WCK, Ruiter TJJ, Yang JCC, Chen N, Chhuor J, Patil S, et al: Hyperinsulinemia acts via acinar insulin receptors to initiate pancreatic cancer by increasing digestive enzyme production and inflammation. Cell Metab. 35:2119–2135.e5. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang W, Hapach LA, Taufalele PV, Bates ME, Wu Y and Reinhart-King C: Diabetic hyperglycemia-induced glycation regulates tumor vasculature integrity via NF-kB-mediated GM-CSF secretion by tumor cells. Cell Biomater. 1:1001862025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Vella V, Lappano R, Bonavita E, Maggiolini M, Clarke RB, Belfiore A and De Francesco EM: Insulin/IGF axis and the receptor for advanced glycation end products: Role in meta-inflammation and potential in cancer therapy. Endocr Rev. 44:693–723. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Coser M, Neamtu BM, Pop B, Cipaian CR and Crisan M: RAGE and its ligands in breast cancer progression and metastasis. Oncol Rev. 18:15079422025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Oliveira RV, Souza VB, Souza PC, Soares FA, Vassallo J, Rocha RM and Schenka AA: Detection of putative stem-cell markers in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast by immunohistochemistry: Does it improve prognostic/predictive assessments? Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 26:760–768. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Korfias D, Contis J, Frangou-Plemenou M, Gennatas K, Kondis A and Vlachodimitropoulos D: Stem cells in ductal breast cancer: Immunohistochemical expression of CD44, CD24, CD133, and ALDH-1 markers in 104 cases. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 41:36–41. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Bamodu OA, Chung CC, Pisanic TR II and Wu ATH: The intricate interplay between cancer stem cells and cell-of-origin of cancer: Implications for therapeutic strategies. Front Oncol. 14:14046282024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Mengistu BA, Tsegaw T, Demessie Y, Getnet K, Bitew AB, Kinde MZ, Beirhun AM, Mebratu AS, Mekasha YT, Feleke MG and Fenta MD: Comprehensive review of drug resistance in mammalian cancer stem cells: Implications for cancer therapy. Cancer Cell Int. 24:4062024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Park SY, Choi JH and Nam JS: Targeting cancer stem cells in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancers (Basel). 11:9652019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Murillo LL, Sugden CJ, Ozsvari B, Moftakhar Z, Hassan GS, Sotgia F and Lisanti MP: ALDHHigh breast cancer stem cells exhibit a mesenchymal-senescent hybrid phenotype, with elevated metabolic and migratory activities. Cells. 13:20592024. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Ali R, Samman N, Al Zahrani H, Nehdi A, Rahman S, Khan AL, Al Balwi M, Alriyees LA, Alzaid M, Al Askar A and Boudjelal M: Isolation and characterization of a new naturally immortalized human breast carcinoma cell line, KAIMRC1. BMC Cancer. 17:8032017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ambrosio MR, Mosca G, Migliaccio T, Liguoro D, Nele G, Schonauer F, D'Andrea F, Liotti F, Prevete N, Melillo RM, et al: Glucose enhances pro-tumorigenic functions of mammary adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal/stem cells on breast cancer cell lines. Cancers (Basel). 14:54212022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ayodeji SA, Bao B, Teslow EA, Polin LA, Dyson G, Bollig-Fischer A and Fehl C: Hyperglycemia and O-GlcNAc transferase activity drive a cancer stem cell pathway in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Cell Int. 23:1022023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Júnior JPL, Brescansin CP, Santos-Weiss ICR, Welter M, Souza EM, Rego FGM, Picheth G and Alberton D: Serum fluorescent advanced glycation End (F-AGE) products in gestational diabetes patients. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 61:233–237. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kato S, Matsumura T, Sugawa H and Nagai R: Correlation between serum advanced glycation end-products and vascular complications in patient with type 2 diabetes. Sci Rep. 14:187222024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sharaf H, Matou-Nasri S, Wang Q, Rabhan Z, Al-Eidi H, Al Abdulrahman A and Ahmed N: Advanced glycation endproducts increase proliferation, migration and invasion of the breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1852:429–441. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Matou-Nasri S, Sharaf H, Wang Q, Almobadel N, Rabhan Z, Al-Eidi H, Yahya WB, Trivilegio T, Ali R, Al-Shanti N and Ahmed N: Biological impact of advanced glycation endproducts on estrogen receptor breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 1863:2808–2820. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Alanazi F, Alsaleh AA, Alamoudi MK, Alasiri A, Haymond A and Matou-Nasri S: Targeting p70S6K1 inhibits glycated albumin-induced triple-negative breast cancer cell invasion and overexpression of galectin-3, a potential prognostic marker in diabetic patients with invasive breast cancer. Biomedicines. 13:6122025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Brix N, Samaga D, Hennel R, Gehr K, Zitzelsberger H and Lauber K: The clonogenic assay: Robustness of plating efficiency-based analysis is strongly compromised by cellular cooperation. Radiat Oncol. 15:2482020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Maashi Y, Almutairi S, Aldawood M, Al-Eidi H, AlRoshody R, Alghamdi HA, Bahattab S, Alsaleh AA, Alkadi H, Alghamdi S, et al: In vitro oncogenic effects of glycated albumin in human colorectal cancer cell lines HT29 and SW620 revealing EpCAM and Galectin-3 upregulation in Type 2 diabetic colorectal cancer tissues as potential biomarkers. J Oncol Res Ther. 9:102272024. | |
|
Karthikeyan SK, Chandrashekar DS, Sahai S, Shrestha S, Aneja R, Singh R, Kleer CG, Kumar S, Qin ZS, Nakshatri H, et al: MammOnc-DB, an integrative breast cancer data analysis platform for target discovery. NPJ Breast Cancer. 11:352025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Staaf J, Häkkinen J, Hegardt C, Saal LH, Kimbung S, Hedenfalk I, Lien T, Sørlie T, Naume B, Russnes H, et al: RNA sequencing-based single sample predictors of molecular subtype and risk of recurrence for clinical assessment of early-stage breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer. 8:942022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Pereira B, Chin SF, Rueda OM, Vollan HK, Provenzano E, Bardwell HA, Pugh M, Jones L, Russell R, Sammut SJ, et al: The somatic mutation profiles of 2,433 breast cancers refines their genomic and transcriptomic landscapes. Nat Commun. 7:114792016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Cerami E, Gao J, Dogrusoz U, Gross BE, Sumer SO, Aksoy BA, Jacobsen A, Byrne CJ, Heuer ML, Larsson E, et al: The cBio cancer genomics portal: An open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Dicov. 2:401–404. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Gao J, Aksoy BA, Dogrusoz U, Dresdner G, Gross B, Sumer SO, Sun Y, Jacobsen A, Sinha R, Larsson E, et al: Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci Signal. 2:pl12013.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
De Bruijn I, Kundra R, Mastrogiacomo B, Tran TN, Sikina L, Mazor T, Li X, Ochoa A, Zhao G, Lai B, et al: Analysis and visualization of longitudinal genomic and clinical data from the AACR project GENIE Biopharma collaborative in cBioPortal. Cancer Res. 83:3861–3867. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Rueda OM, Sammut SJ, Seoane JA, Chin SF, Caswell-Jin JL, Callari M, Batra R, Pereira B, Bruna A, Ali HR, et al: Dynamics of breast-cancer relapse reveal late-recurring ER-positive genomic subgroups. Nature. 567:399–404. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Curtis C, Shah SP, Chin SF, Turashvili G, Rueda OM, Dunning MJ, Speed D, Lynch AG, Samarajiwa S, Yuan Y, et al: The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroup. Nature. 486:346–352. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Panigrahi G, Candia J, Dorsey TH, Tang W, Ohara Y, Byun JS, Minas TZ, Zhang A, Ajao A, Cellini A, et al: Diabetes-associated breast cancer is molecularly distinct and shows a DNA damage repair deficiency. JCI Insight. 8:e1701052023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang S, Ma L, Wang Z, He H, Chen H, Duan Z, Li Y, Si Q, Chuang TH, Chen C, et al: Lactate dehydrogenase-A (LDH-A) preserves cancer stemness and recruitment of tumor-associated macrophages to promote breast cancer progression. Front Oncol. 11:6544522021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Park YMM, Bookwalter DB, O'Brien KM, Jackson CL, Weinberg CR and Sandler DP: A prospective study of type 2 diabetes, metformin use, and risk of breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 32:351–359. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhang F, de Haan-Du J, Sidorenkov G, Landman GWD, Jalving M, Zhang Q and de Bock GH: Type 2 diabetes mellitus and clinicopathological tumor characteristics in women diagnosed with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancers (Basel). 13:49922021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Abdelaty WR: Outcome of management of invasive lobular carcinoma in comparison to invasive ductal carcinoma. Al-Azhar Int Med J. 5:262024. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Xiong JY, Wang JM, Zhao XL, Yang C, Jiang XS, Chen YM, Chen CQ and Li ZY: Glycated albumin as a biomarker for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Clin Cases. 9:9520–9534. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chiavarina B, Nokin MJ, Durieux F, Bianchi E, Turtoi A, Peulen O, Peixoto P, Irigaray P, Uchida K, Belpomme D, et al: Triple negative tumors accumulate significantly less methylglyoxal specific adducts than other human breast cancer subtypes. Oncotarget. 5:5472–5482. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Altundag-Erdogan Ö, Çetinkaya H, Öteyaka MÖ and Çelebi-Slatik B: Targeting MDA-MB-231 cancer stem cells with temsirolimus in 3D collagen/PGA/NA2SiO3-based bone model. Macromol Mater Engineer. 310:24003602025. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Gomez-Salazar MA, Wang Y, Thottappillil N, Hardy RW, Alexandre M, Höller F, Martin N, Gonzalez-Galofre ZN, Stefancova D, Medici D, et al: Aldehyde dehydrogenase, a marker of normal and malignant stem cells, typifies mesenchymal progenitors in perivascular niches. Stem Cells Transl Med. 12:474–484. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Li B, Tian J, Zhang F, Wu C, Li Z, Wang D, Zhuang J, Chen S, Song W, Tang Y, et al: Self-assembled aldehyde dehydrogenase-activatable nano-prodrug for cancer stem cell-enriched tumor detection and treatment. Nat Commun. 16:94172024. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Altshuler A, Wickstrom SA and Shalom-Feuerstein R: Spotlighting adult stem cells: Advances, pitfall, and challenges. Trends Cell Biol. 33:477–494. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Alvarez-Elizondo MB and Weihs D: Breast cancer stem cells: Mechanobiology reveals highly invasive cancer cell subpopulations. Cell Mol Life Sci. 79:1342022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ouyang M, Gui Y, Li N and Zhao L: Prognostic model based on tumor stemness genes for triple-negative breast cancer. Sci Rep. 14:308552024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Li X, Zhang Y, Gong J, Liu W, Zhao H, Xue H, Ren Z, Bao J and Lin Z: Development of a breast cancer invasion score to predict tumor aggressiveness and prognosis via PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway analysis. Cell Death Disc. 11:1572025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Nayak A, Warrier NM and Kumar P: Cancer stem cells and the tumor microenvironment: Targeting the critical crosstalk through nanocarrier system. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 18:2209–2233. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chu X, Tian W, Ning J, Xiao G, Zhou Y, Wang Z, Zhai Z, Tanzhu G, Yang J and Zhou R: Cancer stem cells: Advances in knowledge and implications for cancer therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 9:1702024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lee KJ, Yoo JW, Kim YK, Choi JH, Ha TY and Gil M: Advanced glycation end products promote triple negative breast cancer cells via ERK and NF-kB pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 495:2195–2201. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Khoo SH, Wu PR, Yeh KT, Hsu SL and Wu CH: Biological and clinical significance of the AGE-RAGE axis in the aggressiveness and prognosis of prostate cancer. J Food Drug Anal. 31:664–682. 2023.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Azizian-Farsani F, Abedpoor N, Sheikhha MH, Gure AO, Nasr-Esfahani MH and Ghaedi K: Receptor for advanced glycation end products acts as a fuel to colorectal cancer development. Front Oncol. 10:5522832020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Nam HK, Jeong SR, Pyo MC, Ha SK, Nam MH and Lee KW: Methylglyoxal-derived advanced glycation end products (AGE4) promote cell proliferation and survival in renal cell carcinoma cells through the RAGE/Akt/ERK signaling pathways. Biol Pharm Bull. 44:1697–1706. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Galassi C, Manic G, Estellar M, Galluzzi L and Vitale I: Epigenetic regulation of cancer stemness. Sign Transduct Target Ther. 10:2432025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lee H, Kim B, Park J, Park S, Yoo G, Yum S, Kang W, Lee JM, Youn H and Youn B: Cancer stem cells: Landscape, challenges and emerging therapeutic innovations. Sign Transduct Target Ther. 10:2482025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Khanh VC, Fukushige M, Moriguchi K, Yamashita T, Osaka M, Hiramatsu Y and Ohneda O: Type 2 diabetes mellitus induced paracrine effects on breast cancer metastasis through extracellular vesicles from human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. 29:1382–1394. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chang YH, Ngo NH, Vuong CK, Yamashita T, Osaka M, Hiramatsu Y and Ohneda O: Type 2 diabetes mellitus promotes the differentiation of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells into cancer-associated fibroblasts, induced by breast cancer cells. Stem Cells Dev. 31:659–671. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Viedma-rodríguez R, Martínez-Hernández MG, Martínez-Torres DI and Baiza-Gutman A: Epithelial mesenchymal transition and progression of breast cancer promoted by diabetes mellitus in mice are associated with increased expression of glycolytic and proteolytic enzymes. Horm Cancer. 11:170–181. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Baek KH, Choi J and Pei CZ: Cellular functions of OCT-3/4 regulated by ubiquitination in proliferating cells. Cancers (Basel). 12:6632020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhao FQ, Misra Y, Li DB, Wadsworth MP, Krag D, Weaver D, Tessitore J, Li DW, Zhang G, Tian Q and Buss K: Differential expression of Oct3/4 in human breast cancer and normal tissues. Int J Oncol. 52:2069–2078. 2018.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Shu S, Li Z, Liu L, Ying X, Zhang Y, Wang T, Zhou X, Jiang P and Lv W: HPV16 E6-activated OCT4 promotes cervical cancer progression by suppressing p53 expression via co-repressor NCOR1. Front Oncol. 12:9008562022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sun L, Liu T, Zhang S, Guo K and Liu Y: Oct4 induces EMT through LEF1/b-catenin dependent WNT signaling pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol Lett. 13:2599–2606. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Berr AL, Wiese K, Dos Santos G, Koch CM, Anekalla KR, Kidd M, Davis JM, Cheng Y, Hu YS and Ridge KM: Vimentin is required for tumor progression and metastasis in a mouse model of non-small cell lung cancer. Oncogene. 42:2074–2087. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Pearson GW: Control of invasion by epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition programs during metastasis. J Clin Med. 8:6462019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yamashita N, Tokunaga E, Kitao Y, Taketani K, Akiyoshi S, Okada S, Aishima S, Morita M and Maehara Y: Vimentin as a prognostic factor for triple-negative breast cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 139:739–746. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chen Z, Fang Z and Ma J: Regulatory mechanisms and clinical significance of vimentin in breast cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 133:1110682021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ahmadpour F, Igder S, Moghadam ARE, Moradipoodeh B, Sepahdar A, Mokarram P, Fallahi J and Mohammadzadeh G: Metformin as a potential therapeutic agent in breast cancer: Targeting miR-125a methylation and epigenetic regulation. Int J Mol Cell Med. 13:272–285. 2024.PubMed/NCBI |