International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.
International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.
Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.
Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.
Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.
Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.
International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.
Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.
Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.
Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.
An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a fatal disease, with ~51,980 deaths in the US each year and a 5-year survival rate of only 13%, making it a malignancy with one of the worst prognosis among all cancer types (1). Currently, the primary clinical treatments for PC include surgical resection and chemotherapy. However, due to the aggressive progression of the disease and the fact that ~80% of patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage, surgical resection is often not feasible (2). Even the modified version of folinic acid, irinotecan and oxaliplatin (mFOLFIRINOX) chemotherapy regimen, which is considered one of the most effective treatments for PC, achieves a 3-year overall survival rate of merely 63.4% (3). mFOLFIRINOX is an effective combined chemotherapy regimen. The name is derived from the abbreviations of its four constituent drugs: FOL, FIRI and NOX. The prefix ‘m’ indicates ‘improved’. This regimen was developed by the classic FOLFIRINOX protocol. Currently, it is mainly used as a first-line treatment option for patients with good physical condition who have locally advanced or metastatic PC. FOLFIRINOX is currently one of the key chemotherapy regimens in the field of PC. However, chemotherapy for PC is often limited by two major challenges: The development of chemoresistance, which prevents patients from completing the full course of treatment and the cumulative toxicity of prolonged regimens. Therefore, both treatment efficacy and quality of life of patients are compromised (4). The exact etiology of PC remains to be elucidated; however, the tumor microenvironment (TME), environmental factors and genetic predisposition are recognized as major contributors to its initiation and progression (5). For instance, smoking is the primary non-genetic factor associated with an increased risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), with an odds ratio of 3.7 (95% confidence interval: 1.8–7.6) (6). Additionally, smoking is significantly associated with a notable decrease in the average age of diagnosis among patients with familial PDAC. These findings underscore the critical role of smoking-related environmental factors in the pathogenesis and progression of PDAC (7,8). The TME of PC consists of cancer, stromal and immune cells and extracellular matrix components, all of which serve key roles in promoting tumor growth and metastasis (9). Key features include driver gene mutations in cancer cells, excessive collagen and extracellular matrix deposition by stromal cells leading to tissue fibrosis and markedly expressed inflammatory cytokines that create a pro-inflammatory and immunosuppressive milieu. This unique TME not only presents a notable barrier to treatment but also offers potential targets for novel therapeutic strategies. Therefore, developing early diagnostic methods and effective treatments for PC remains an urgent and key challenge.
Exosomes are a type of extracellular vesicle (EV) with a diameter of 30–150 nm. Exosomes carry a diverse cargo of lipids, proteins and nucleic acids (10), enabling them to serve as exceptional messengers for complex information transfer between cells (11), across distant tissues (12) and between tumor and stromal compartments (13). Exosomes are present in nearly all bodily fluids, including blood, sweat, tears, urine, saliva, breast milk, ascites and cerebrospinal fluid. Exosomes derived from different sources can exert distinct effects on tumors (14). Tumor-derived exosomes can transfer oncogenic molecules (15), promote anti-apoptotic effects (16), stimulate angiogenesis (17) and alter tumor cell metabolism (18), thereby facilitating tumor growth. However, a previous study has also demonstrated that exosomes hold promise as biomarkers for the early diagnosis of PC (19). Furthermore, exosomes can serve as notable drug delivery vehicles, offering potential therapeutic strategies for an extensive subset of patients with PC with chemoresistance (20). Furthermore, elucidating the interrelationship between the TME of PC and exosomes may help researchers identify novel therapeutic targets, thereby opening novel avenues for treatment. Thus, exosomes serve a dual role in PC. The present review aims to summarize the mechanisms underlying the dual functions of exosomes in the initiation and progression of PC, provide novel insights and directions in optimally utilizing exosomes in clinical therapy and accelerate the clinical translation of exosome-based targeted therapies for PC.
In 1946, Chargaff and West (21) identified a coagulation factor resembling thromboplastic protein in the blood of patients with hemophilia and bleeding disorders, which is considered the starting point of the field of EV biology. Currently, EVs are categorized into three types based on their diameter and release mechanisms: Exosomes (30–150 nm), microvesicles (100–1,000 nm) and apoptotic bodies (500–5,000 nm), exosomes, which are released upon fusion of multivesicular bodies with the plasma membrane; microvesicles, which bud directly from the plasma membrane; and apoptotic bodies, which are generated during apoptosis via cell membrane blebbing. These three types of vesicles differ in size, formation mechanisms and biological functions, collectively serving as important mediators of intercellular communication (Fig. 1). Exosomes, a type of EV, were identified in 1981 by Trams et al (22) in the supernatant of cultured sheep reticulocytes. In 1987, Johnstone et al (23) named them ‘exosomes’. The cellular origin and purity of exosomes serve a key role in processes such as the occurrence, metastasis and drug resistance of PC. Therefore, the development of efficient and specific techniques for the isolation and extraction of exosomes is of notable importance for research on the mechanisms of PC and its clinical applications. Several exosome isolation techniques have been developed to date, including ultracentrifugation (24), ultrafiltration (25), size-exclusion chromatography (26), precipitation-based isolation (27), immunoaffinity capture (28) and microchip-based technology (29). Each of these techniques has its own principles, advantages and disadvantages (30). However, each technique has certain limitations and fails to meet the expectations of being efficient, high in purity, simple and low in cost. Therefore, the effective, accurate and efficient isolation of high-purity exosomes remains a major challenge (31).
The biogenesis and synthesis of exosomes is a complex process, which begins with endocytosis at the cell membrane surface, where early endosomes are formed through inward budding. Over time, early endosomes mature into late endosomes. Late endosomes primarily form intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) through three pathways: Endosomal sorting complex required for transport, tetraspanin proteins and ceramide induction, and these ILVs gradually develop into multivesicular bodies (MVBs) (32–34). Subsequently, most MVBs fuse with lysosomes, leading to the degradation of ILVs, while a small number of MVBs fuse with the plasma membrane and release exosomes into the extracellular environment (32,35,36). Exosomes carry a rich cargo of lipids, proteins and nucleic acids. The lipid components in exosomes include cholesterol, sphingomyelin, glycosphingolipids, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidic acid and ceramide (37). Common proteins in exosomes include those associated with membrane transport, such as Ras-related in brain GTPases, annexins, flotillins and MVB biogenesis proteins including apoptosis-linked gene 2-interacting protein X (38). Exosomes also contain tetraspanin proteins, including CD9, CD63 and CD81, as well as heat shock proteins (HSP) such as HSP60 and HSP90. The nucleic acid components in exosomes are also highly diverse, such as microRNA (miRNA/miR) and messenger RNA, which were among the first two types identified (39,40), followed by long non-coding RNA (lncRNA), transfer RNA, small nuclear RNA and circular RNA (circRNA/circ) (39,41) (Fig. 2). These RNA not only act as regulators of gene expression but also serve as potential biomarkers (42). For instance, miR-141 can be detected in the blood of patients with prostate cancer, and its expression level is correlated with the size and malignancy of the tumor (43). Saliva miR-3679-5p and miR-940 have good discriminatory ability and can be used for the detection of resectable PC, with reasonable specificity and sensitivity (44). Furthermore, lncRNA can be regarded as an independent predictor of pathological cardiac remodeling and diastolic dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes (45).
Exosomes serve a non-negligible ‘dark’ role in the initiation and progression of PC, driving tumor development and inducing therapy resistance through multiple mechanisms. Specifically, exosomes serve as key mediators of intercellular communication and can be derived from various cell types, including PC cells, adipocytes, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and immune cells (46,47). By carrying specific molecules such as miRNAs, proteins and circRNAs, exosomes activate multiple signaling pathways [such as signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), hypoxia inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α), epidermal growth factor receptor/mitogen-activated protein kinase (EGFR/MAPK)], directly promoting tumor cell proliferation, invasion and metastasis. Simultaneously, exosomes act as key modulators of the immunosuppressive TME. Exosomes can induce M2 macrophage polarization and regulate pathways such as protein kinase B/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (AKT/ERK), establishing a local environment conducive to immune evasion and tumor metastasis. Furthermore, exosomes notably contribute to chemoresistance. They can function as drug efflux pumps or deliver miRNAs (such as miR-155 and miR-210) to inhibit apoptosis and ferroptosis, thereby mediating resistance to gemcitabine. Furthermore, exosomes can also promote the progression of PC by regulating lipid metabolism and the TME (Table I) (48–66). These findings not only highlight exosomes as key drivers of malignant progression in PC but also provide a theoretical basis in targeting them to reverse drug resistance and improve therapeutic efficacy (Fig. 3).
Exosomes can drive the proliferation of tumor cells through multiple signaling pathways. The mechanism of their action mainly involves exosomes derived from tumor cells, CAFs and immune cells. A previous study using in vitro cell models reported that exosomes derived from cancer-associated adipocytes generated by co-culturing human adipocytes with human PC cells could promote the proliferation, invasion, migration and drug resistance of PC cells through the suppressor of cytokine signaling 7/STAT3/serum amyloid A1 pathway (48). Similarly, Zhang et al (49) reported that exosomes derived from CAFs could promote the proliferation of PC cells by regulating Abelson murine leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2 through miR-224-3p. Based on an in vivo animal model study, Zhou et al (50) reported that exosomes derived from CAFs could also exert effects through the silent information regulator 3/histone 3 lysine 9 acetylation/HIF-1α axis.
By contrast, exosomes secreted by PC cells themselves also serve a key role in tumor progression. For example, miR-519a/522-5p in exosomes can promote PC progression by enhancing the Warburg effect (51), miR-3960 promotes the proliferation, invasion and metastasis of PC cells through the transcription factor activator protein-2α axis (52), and the DnaJ heat shock protein family (HSP40) member B11 protein participates in PC progression by regulating the EGFR/MAPK pathway (53). Furthermore, exosomes derived from immune cells also regulate the progression of PC. For instance, miR-202-5p and miR-142-5p in exosomes derived from macrophages can enhance the invasiveness of PC cells and promote the metastasis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (54). In addition, exosomes derived from M2-type macrophages can further support tumor growth by targeting E2F transcription factor 2 and inducing tumor angiogenesis (55). These results collectively indicated that exosomes can jointly serve a role in promoting the occurrence and development of PC through various mechanisms.
The mechanism by which exosomes promote the progression of PC by shaping an immunosuppressive microenvironment has been a notable research direction in this field. Although existing studies have revealed the relevant pathways, the strength of the evidence varies, mainly based on in vitro cell models or in vivo animal models. In in vitro cell models, it has been reported that exosomes derived from PC cells can induce M2-type macrophage polarization by delivering miR-510 and lncRNA FGD5-AS1, thereby enhancing the vitality, migration and invasion of cancer cells (56,57). In in vivo animal models, the relevant mechanisms of action have been further verified and expanded. For example, Yang et al (58) reported that exosomes derived from CAFs can carry prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 and induce M2-type macrophage polarization by activating the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein 1, thereby promoting the metastasis of PC. The exosomes of tumor-associated macrophages, through the tyrosine kinase-binding protein, promote the metastasis process of PC via the CD44/AKT/ERK pathway (59). These results revealed the multi-cellular origin and multi-pathway synergy of exosomes in shaping the immunosuppressive microenvironment, providing key clues for further understanding of the progression mechanism of PC.
PC is prone to develop treatment resistance at an early stage, markedly threatening the life and quality of life of patients. Currently, the mechanism of drug resistance in PC has not been fully elucidated, but exosomes may serve a key role in this process. Exosomes may mediate PC resistance through multiple pathways (67). They can either remove drugs from cancer cells directly or deliver miRNA mutations or upregulated proteins to drug-sensitive cells to exert an indirect effect (20,68,69). The drug resistance mechanism of exosomes has been further clarified in different research models. In vitro cell models have demonstrated that exosomes derived from PC cells can upregulate STAT3 expression by inhibiting miR-298 through protein phosphatase 3 catalytic subunit β (60). Furthermore, exosomes can induce the high expression level of ATP-binding cassette sub-family G member 2 as a drug efflux pump in cells in vitro (61). The miR-210 in exosomes derived from PC stem cells can trigger the mTOR signaling pathway, thereby inducing gemcitabine resistance (62).
In vivo animal models have further identified that exosomes derived from CAFs can inhibit ferroptosis by mediating the acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 4 pathway through miR-3173-5p, thereby enhancing the resistance of PC cells to gemcitabine (63). Of note, the clinical sample analysis supported the hypothesis that exosomes derived from PC cells, carrying miR-155, target tumor protein 53 inducible nuclear protein 1 and inhibit apoptosis, thereby contributing to the drug resistance mechanism (64). These findings revealed the multi-level and multi-pathway regulatory role of exosomes in PC resistance, providing notable evidence in further understanding of the resistance mechanism and the development of reversal strategies.
Exosomes participate in metabolic reprogramming and immune microenvironment remodeling in PC by delivering lipid metabolism-related molecules. For instance, previous research indicated that the fatty acid binding protein 7 in macrophages can transfer the induced lipids to CD8+ T cells and tumor cells through exosomes. This process leads to dysfunction of CD8+ T cells and proliferation of tumor cells through metabolic reprogramming (65). Furthermore, a previous study demonstrated that the medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase present in exosomes enhances gemcitabine resistance by regulating fatty acid metabolism and ferroptosis in PC (66). These findings indicated that exosomes serve not only as carriers but also as key mediators of lipid metabolic reprogramming, indirectly regulating the immunosuppressive state of the TME through metabolic intervention.
Although exosomes serve an undeniable ‘dark side’ role in the occurrence and development of PC, they can promote disease progression by directly driving tumor growth and cell proliferation, shaping an immunosuppressive microenvironment and inducing treatment resistance. However, its unique biological characteristics also provide a novel ‘bright side’ role for the treatment of PC. This duality of opposites lays the foundation for its transformation from a disease promoter to a diagnostic and therapeutic tool. Based on further understanding of the mechanism of action of exosomes in PC, researchers are actively developing their application potential in early diagnosis, targeted therapy and drug resistance reversal, thereby maximizing the positive role of exosomes in PC. The following section systematically elaborates on the latest research progress of exosomes as diagnostic markers, direct therapeutic tools and drug delivery carriers.
In recent years, exosomes have demonstrated notable ‘bright side’ potential in the diagnosis and treatment of PC. In terms of diagnosis, due to the protective effects of their lipid bilayer membrane and the CD47 transmembrane protein, exosomes carrying PC-specific information remain relatively stable in the circulatory system and are less susceptible to clearance by monocytes. This stability provides a possibility for early diagnosis through liquid biopsy (70–72). Regarding therapeutic applications, exosomes exhibit a key role: i) Exosomes can function as natural therapeutic agents originating directly from immune cells or stem cells, capable of effectively inhibiting tumor cell proliferation and selectively killing cancer cells; ii) exosomes represent a highly promising class of drug delivery vehicles. By loading chemotherapeutic drugs or immunomodulators, exosomes enable precise targeting to overcome drug resistance and reprogram the TME, thereby offering notable potential for effective PC treatment; and iii) exosomes can exert an active effect through the ‘exosome-lipid metabolism-TME’ axis (Table II) (73–86) (Fig. 4).
In recent years, exosomes have demonstrated potential to serve as a biomarker for the early diagnosis of PC. Several studies based on clinical samples have systematically verified their value. In 2022, Odaka et al (73) identified that CD63+ cells in serum-derived exosomes and CD41/CD61+ cells in platelet-derived exosomes serve as potential diagnostic biomarkers for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Furthermore, miR-451a in serum-derived exosomes (74), as well as G protein-coupled receptor class C group 5 member C and EGFR pathway substrate 8 (75) have been proposed as candidate markers for the early detection of PC. In the same year, further research revealed that high expression levels of circRNAs (hsa_circ_0001666 and hsa_circ_0006220) in plasma-derived exosomes also possess diagnostic value (76). miR-20a, which is present in exosomes derived from duodenal fluid, has also been proposed as a biomarker for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (77). These findings were all based on systematic validation using clinical samples and had a high level of evidence strength.
Furthermore, in order to enhance the sensitivity and specificity of exosome detection, novel detection technologies are constantly emerging. For example, Li et al (87) constructed an immunoassay system based on a hierarchical surface-enhanced Raman scattering substrate, enabling highly sensitive detection of exosomes. The study identified that a novel combination of leucine-rich α-2-glycoprotein 1-derived exosomes and glypican-1-derived exosomes could enhance the diagnostic efficiency for PC. Yu et al (88) developed a simple nanoliquid biopsy method that achieves specific, ultrasensitive and cost-effective exosome detection through a dual-specific biomarker antigen co-recognition and capture strategy. Yin et al (89) designed a graphene field-effect transistor-based biosensor for accurate and rapid detection of PC-associated exosomes. These technological advancements have collectively facilitated the transformation of exosomes from biomarker identification to clinical application, providing a multi-level solution for the early diagnosis of PC.
Exosomes can serve as a direct therapeutic tool in inhibiting the development of PC and their effects have been verified through various research models. In in vitro cell models, exosomes derived from multiple cell sources exhibited clear antitumor activity. For instance, exosomes derived from natural killer cells can upregulate the expression level of let-7b-5p in PC cells and target the cell cycle regulatory factor CDK6, thereby inhibiting tumor cell proliferation (78). Furthermore, Hasoglu and Karatug Kacar (79) identified that exosomes derived from pancreatic islet progenitor cells can selectively kill PC cells without notable damage to normal cells, demonstrating good biological safety. In in vivo animal models, these therapeutic potentialities can be further verified. A previous study has demonstrated that exosomes derived from umbilical cord blood natural killer cells can enter PANC-1 cells through endocytosis, induce mitochondrial oxidative damage and inhibit the progression of this cell line, revealing a marked anti-PC effect (80). Furthermore, miR-124 contained in exosomes derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) has also exhibited anti-PC activity in both in vitro and in vivo experiments (81). These studies collectively demonstrated that exosomes have the potential for multi-mechanism synergy, extensive sources and good safety in the treatment of PC, providing notable basis for the development of novel biological therapies.
Exosomes, as an efficient drug delivery carrier, are expected to provide a safer and more effective delivery strategy for traditional anti-PC drugs due to their notable biocompatibility and low toxicity (90,91). An in vitro cell model study demonstrated that exosomes derived from human BMSCs carrying gemcitabine can enhance apoptosis to inhibit the proliferation of PC cells, thereby inhibiting the progression of PC (82). Furthermore, exosomes derived from M1-type macrophages loaded with gemcitabine and deferasirox can effectively overcome drug resistance and provide a potential effective treatment strategy for patients with PC with drug resistance (83). The in vivo animal models further demonstrated the therapeutic advantages of the exosome delivery system, autologous exosomes carrying gemcitabine can markedly promote the uptake of the drug in cancer cells and enhance its antitumor effect (84). Furthermore, the emerging engineered exosome platform offers a novel direction for the regulation of the TME; for instance, Sun et al (92) developed a novel exosome-based drug delivery platform, cmExoaCD11b, aiming to precisely target and reprogram the TME for immunotherapy of PC. This technology can cause M2 macrophages to polarize to the M1 phenotype, thereby reprogramming the TME and markedly inhibiting the development of PC. These studies collectively demonstrated that exosomes not only serve as efficient drug carriers but can also achieve multi-mechanism synergistic antitumor effects through dynamic interactions with the TME.
Of note, exosomes derived from M1-type macrophages can inhibit the lipid metabolism pathway, thereby reducing the proliferation, migratory and invasive abilities of PC cells, while simultaneously promoting their apoptosis (85). Furthermore, a previous study has demonstrated that exosomes may be involved in lipid metabolism and regulate the TME, thereby participating in multiple processes of PC (86). These findings provided novel insights in developing metabolism-targeted exosome-based therapies.
In summary, the present review systematically elaborated on the dual roles of exosomes in PC and their specific mechanisms of action. Exosomes serve a positive role in the treatment of PC, however, their involvement in regulating PC cells, shaping an immunosuppressive microenvironment and promoting chemotherapy resistance remains to be explored in future research. Further exploration of the key molecules, proteins and signaling pathways underlying these adverse effects may provide novel research directions and intervention strategies for targeted therapy of PC.
However, numerous challenges remain in realizing the optimal application of exosomes for PC therapy. First, current techniques in isolating and extracting exosomes face notable limitations (93). Although multiple methods are available, such as ultracentrifugation and size-exclusion chromatography, a standardized protocol that simultaneously ensures high purity, simplicity and low cost is still lacking (94,95). Establishing a unified separation standard for exosomes is of notable importance for the reproducibility of research and cross-study comparisons. Second, the diameter of exosomes ranges from 30–150 nm, which is below the diffraction limit of conventional optical microscopy. This poses notable challenges in visualizing the release, transport and real-time dynamics of exosomes. In recent years, super-resolution microscopy holds promise in resolving exosomal ultrastructure; its high spatial resolution often comes at the expense of temporal efficiency, making dynamic studies in living cells particularly challenging (96,97). Third, the extraction of exosomes remains costly. While obtaining exosomes from patient urine or saliva is a non-invasive approach with certain practical advantages, the process is often time-consuming and requires notable financial investment (98). Of note, in recent years, EVs extracted from natural plants or food sources have successively demonstrated notable biocompatibility and therapeutic potential, providing a key direction and research breakthrough in reducing extraction costs and developing stable and controllable EV resources (99,100). Fourth, although exosomes exhibit notable promise as drug delivery vehicles, key issues such as high loss rates during drug loading and elevated production costs should be addressed (101). Currently, the use of serum-free culture systems to optimize the production process of exosomes, as well as the development of synthetic biomimetic vesicles with similar functions, provide a feasible technical direction in addressing these issues (102). Fifth, there is a notable lack of clinical data. Current research on exosome-based therapies for PC is largely limited to in vitro studies and in vivo mouse models. However, human clinical trials are still lacking (78,82,84). To promote its clinical application, the following key steps need to be clarified: i) Pharmacological and toxicological research are warranted to elucidate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics, biodistribution and potential immunogenicity of exosomes in the body; ii) in-depth clinical trials; and iii) progressive research from safety assessment to efficacy validation. Sixth, future studies should further elucidate how exosomes regulate the TME through lipid metabolism reprogramming, particularly their role in metabolic-immune crosstalk. The development of therapeutic strategies targeting exosomal lipid metabolism, such as exosome-based delivery systems for metabolic enzyme inhibitors, may potentially offer novel avenues in reversing immunosuppression and overcoming chemoresistance (103,104).
Addressing the aforementioned challenges will notably advance the application of exosomes in PC research and therapy. The development of more efficient, simpler and cost-effective techniques in isolating and extracting exosomes represents a key and urgent breakthrough warranted in the field. Simultaneously, establishing standardized protocols for exosome extraction is key to improving operational efficiency and minimizing sample loss. Furthermore, systematic comparative studies should be performed to clarify the advantages and suitable scenarios of exosomes over traditional nanocarriers such as liposomes in drug delivery. Lastly, active efforts are warranted to promote the translation of exosome-based therapies for PC from basic research to clinical trials.
In summary, exosomes hold notable potential as a therapeutic strategy for PC. Future research should focus on further understanding of their functional mechanisms, optimizing their isolation and extraction techniques and facilitating their clinical translation, with the potential goal of offering novel treatment options for patients with PC in the clinic at the earliest opportunity.
Exosomes, as key mediators of intercellular communication, are involved in the occurrence and progression of PC. The present review systematically elaborated on the dual roles of exosomes in PC and analyzed their mechanisms of action at the molecular and signaling pathway levels. Previous research has identified that exosomes primarily promote the initiation and progression of PC through the following pathways: i) Directly regulating tumor cell behavior, driving the growth and proliferation of PC cells; ii) remodeling the immunosuppressive microenvironment, providing a more favorable environment for the growth and proliferation of PC cells; iii) inducing therapeutic resistance, thereby reducing the efficacy of drug treatments; and iv) regulating lipid metabolism, by reprogramming metabolism, affects the TME, thereby further supporting the progression of PC.
However, exosomes also exhibit potential in inhibiting the development of PC: i) Specific proteins, nucleic acids and other components carried by exosomes potentially offer novel avenues for the early diagnosis and prognosis assessment of PC; ii) certain exosomes can inhibit the progression of PC through different signaling pathways or by modulating the TME; iii) exosomes can serve as notable carriers for drugs effectively treating PC, enabling targeted delivery of therapeutic agents to achieve enhanced efficacy and reduced toxicity; and iv) the regulatory strategies based on the ‘exosome-lipid metabolism-TME’ axis may become a novel target for the treatment of PC.
The functional duality exhibited by exosomes in PC reflects their complex role in tumor biology: Exosomes can both promote malignant tumor progression and hold potential as diagnostic and therapeutic tools. This paradoxical characteristic suggests that their functions may be regulated by multiple factors, including the source cells, cargo composition and recipient microenvironment. Future research is warranted to further elucidate the specific mechanisms by which exosomes transmit information between different tumor stages and cell types and explore the molecular basis of their transformation from the ‘dark side’ to the ‘bright side’.
In conclusion, a comprehensive understanding of the dual roles of exosomes in PC will not only help further the understanding of the communication network within the TME but also provide a notable basis in developing novel diagnostic strategies and therapeutic methods based on exosomes. Advancement in the clinical translation of exosomes may potentially open novel paths for the early detection and precision treatment of PC in the future.
Not applicable.
Funding: No funding was received.
Not applicable.
ZG contributed to the conception and overall design of the study, drafted the manuscript and prepared the figures and tables. QL reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Data authentication is not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
|
Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN and Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin. 74:12–49. 2024.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Rawla P, Sunkara T and Gaduputi V: Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer: Global trends, etiology and risk factors. World J Oncol. 10:10–27. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Conroy T, Hammel P, Hebbar M, Ben Abdelghani M, Wei AC, Raoul JL, Choné L, Francois E, Artru P, Biagi JJ, et al: FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine as adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 379:2395–2406. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Stoop TF, Javed AA, Oba A, Koerkamp BG, Seufferlein T, Wilmink JW and Besselink MG: Pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 405:1182–1202. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Saba H and Goggins M: Familial pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 51:561–575. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wood LD, Yurgelun MB and Goggins MG: Genetics of familial and sporadic pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology. 156:2041–2055. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ngamruengphong S and Canto MI: Screening for pancreatic cancer. Surg Clin North Am. 96:1223–1233. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Klein AP, Brune KA, Petersen GM, Goggins M, Tersmette AC, Offerhaus GJ, Griffin C, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ, Kern S and Hruban RH: Prospective risk of pancreatic cancer in familial pancreatic cancer kindreds. Cancer Res. 64:2634–2638. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Torphy RJ, Zhu Y and Schulick RD: Immunotherapy for pancreatic cancer: Barriers and breakthroughs. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2:274–281. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Raposo G and Stoorvogel W: Extracellular vesicles: Exosomes, microvesicles, and friends. J Cell Biol. 200:373–383. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ham S, Lima LG, Chai EPZ, Muller A, Lobb RJ, Krumeich S, Wen SW, Wiegmans AP and Möller A: Breast cancer-derived exosomes alter macrophage polarization via gp130/STAT3 signaling. Front Immunol. 9:8712018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Costa-Silva B, Aiello NM, Ocean AJ, Singh S, Zhang H, Thakur BK, Becker A, Hoshino A, Mark MT, Molina H, et al: Pancreatic cancer exosomes initiate pre-metastatic niche formation in the liver. Nat Cell Biol. 17:816–826. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Han S, Gonzalo DH, Feely M, Rinaldi C, Belsare S, Zhai H, Kalra K, Gerber MH, Forsmark CE and Hughes SJ: Stroma-derived extracellular vesicles deliver tumor-suppressive miRNAs to pancreatic cancer cells. Oncotarget. 9:5764–5777. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhang H, Freitas D, Kim HS, Fabijanic K, Li Z, Chen H, Mark MT, Molina H, Martin AB, Bojmar L, et al: Identification of distinct nanoparticles and subsets of extracellular vesicles by asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation. Nat Cell Biol. 20:332–343. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Al-Nedawi K, Meehan B, Micallef J, Lhotak V, May L, Guha A and Rak J: Intercellular transfer of the oncogenic receptor EGFRvIII by microvesicles derived from tumour cells. Nat Cell Biol. 10:619–624. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Raimondo S, Saieva L, Corrado C, Fontana S, Flugy A, Rizzo A, De Leo G and Alessandro R: Chronic myeloid leukemia-derived exosomes promote tumor growth through an autocrine mechanism. Cell Commun Signal. 13:82015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yukawa H, Suzuki K, Aoki K, Arimoto T, Yasui T, Kaji N, Ishikawa T, Ochiya T and Baba Y: Imaging of angiogenesis of human umbilical vein endothelial cells by uptake of exosomes secreted from hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Sci Rep. 8:67652018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhao H, Yang L, Baddour J, Achreja A, Bernard V, Moss T, Marini JC, Tudawe T, Seviour EG, San Lucas FA, et al: Tumor microenvironment derived exosomes pleiotropically modulate cancer cell metabolism. Elife. 5:e102502016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Qin C, Li T, Lin C, Zhao B, Li Z, Zhao Y and Wang W: The systematic role of pancreatic cancer exosomes: distant communication, liquid biopsy and future therapy. Cancer Cell Int. 24:2642024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Oliveira C, Calmeiro J, Carrascal MA, Falcão A, Gomes C, Miguel Neves B and Teresa Cruz M: Exosomes as new therapeutic vectors for pancreatic cancer treatment. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 161:4–14. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chargaff E and West R: The biological significance of the thromboplastic protein of blood. J Biol Chem. 166:189–197. 1946. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Trams EG, Lauter CJ, Salem N Jr and Heine U: Exfoliation of membrane ecto-enzymes in the form of micro-vesicles. Biochim Biophys Acta. 645:63–70. 1981. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Johnstone RM, Adam M, Hammond JR, Orr L and Turbide C: Vesicle formation during reticulocyte maturation. Association of plasma membrane activities with released vesicles (exosomes). J Biol Chem. 262:9412–9420. 1987. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Johnstone RM, Bianchini A and Teng K: Reticulocyte maturation and exosome release: Transferrin receptor containing exosomes shows multiple plasma membrane functions. Blood. 74:1844–1851. 1989. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yu LL, Zhu J, Liu JX, Jiang F, Ni WK, Qu LS, Ni RZ, Lu CH and Xiao MB: A comparison of traditional and novel methods for the separation of exosomes from human samples. Biomed Res Int. 2018:36345632018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lathe GH and Ruthven CR: The separation of substances on the basis of their molecular weights, using columns of starch and water. Biochem J. 60:xxxiv1955.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Cheng H, Fang H, Xu RD, Fu MQ, Chen L, Song XY, Qian JY, Zou YZ, Ma JY and Ge JB: Development of a rinsing separation method for exosome isolation and comparison to conventional methods. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 23:5074–5083. 2019.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yoo CE, Kim G, Kim M, Park D, Kang HJ, Lee M and Huh N: A direct extraction method for microRNAs from exosomes captured by immunoaffinity beads. Anal Biochem. 431:96–98. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wunsch BH, Smith JT, Gifford SM, Wang C, Brink M, Bruce RL, Austin RH, Stolovitzky G and Astier Y: Nanoscale lateral displacement arrays for the separation of exosomes and colloids down to 20 nm. Nat Nanotechnol. 11:936–940. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Li P, Kaslan M, Lee SH, Yao J and Gao Z: Progress in exosome isolation techniques. Theranostics. 7:789–804. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Alderton GK: Diagnosis: Fishing for exosomes. Nat Rev Cancer. 15:4532015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Colombo M, Raposo G and Théry C: Biogenesis, secretion, and intercellular interactions of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 30:255–289. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Simons M and Raposo G: Exosomes-vesicular carriers for intercellular communication. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 21:575–581. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Stoorvogel W, Strous GJ, Geuze HJ, Oorschot V and Schwartz AL: Late endosomes derive from early endosomes by maturation. Cell. 65:417–427. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Hanson PI and Cashikar A: Multivesicular body morphogenesis. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 28:337–362. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sahu R, Kaushik S, Clement CC, Cannizzo ES, Scharf B, Follenzi A, Potolicchio I, Nieves E, Cuervo AM and Santambrogio L: Microautophagy of cytosolic proteins by late endosomes. Dev Cell. 20:131–139. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Skotland T, Hessvik NP, Sandvig K and Llorente A: Exosomal lipid composition and the role of ether lipids and phosphoinositides in exosome biology. J Lipid Res. 60:9–18. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Théry C, Zitvogel L and Amigorena S: Exosomes: Composition, biogenesis and function. Nat Rev Immunol. 2:569–579. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Gusachenko ON, Zenkova MA and Vlassov VV: Nucleic acids in exosomes: Disease markers and intercellular communication molecules. Biochemistry (Mosc). 78:1–7. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Valadi H, Ekström K, Bossios A, Sjöstrand M, Lee JJ and Lötvall JO: Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat Cell Biol. 9:654–659. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sadik N, Cruz L, Gurtner A, Rodosthenous RS, Dusoswa SA, Ziegler O, Van Solinge TS, Wei Z, Salvador-Garicano AM, Gyorgy B, et al: Extracellular RNAs: A new awareness of old perspectives. Methods Mol Biol. 1740:1–15. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Oliveira GP Jr, Zigon E, Rogers G, Davodian D, Lu S, Jovanovic-Talisman T, Jones J, Tigges J, Tyagi S and Ghiran IC: Detection of extracellular vesicle RNA using molecular beacons. iScience. 23:1007822020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Mitchell PS, Parkin RK, Kroh EM, Fritz BR, Wyman SK, Pogosova-Agadjanyan EL, Peterson A, Noteboom J, O'Briant KC, Allen A, et al: Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105:10513–10518. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Xie Z, Yin X, Gong B, Nie W, Wu B, Zhang X, Huang J, Zhang P, Zhou Z and Li Z: Salivary microRNAs show potential as a noninvasive biomarker for detecting resectable pancreatic cancer. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 8:165–173. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
de Gonzalo-Calvo D, Kenneweg F, Bang C, Toro R, van der Meer RW, Rijzewijk LJ, Smit JW, Lamb HJ, Llorente-Cortes V and Thum T: Circulating long-non coding RNAs as biomarkers of left ventricular diastolic function and remodelling in patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes. Sci Rep. 6:373542016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sun W, Ren Y, Lu Z and Zhao X: The potential roles of exosomes in pancreatic cancer initiation and metastasis. Mol Cancer. 19:1352020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Honselmann KC, Finetti P, Birnbaum DJ, Monsalve CS, Wellner UF, Begg SKS, Nakagawa A, Hank T, Li A, Goldsworthy MA, et al: Neoplastic-stromal cell cross-talk regulates matrisome expression in pancreatic cancer. Mol Cancer Res. 18:1889–1902. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Noda K, Sato Y, Okada Y, Nishida K, Kawano Y, Tanahashi T, Bando M, Okamoto K, Takehara M, Sogabe M, et al: Exosomal miR-199a-3p secreted from cancer-associated adipocytes promotes pancreatic cancer progression. Cancer Med. 13:e702652024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhang L, Chen Y, Dai Y, Mou W, Deng P and Jin Y, Xu J and Jin Y: Cancer-associated fibroblast-derived exosome Leptin promotes malignant biological lineage in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma by regulating ABL2 via miR-224-3p. Mol Biol Rep. 51:9952024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhou B, Lei JH, Wang Q, Qu TF, Cha LC, Zhan HX, Liu SL, Hu X, Sun CD, Guo WD, et al: Cancer-associated fibroblast-secreted miR-421 promotes pancreatic cancer by regulating the SIRT3/H3K9Ac/HIF-1α axis. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 38:1080–1092. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Feng S, Chen R, Huang H, Ong M, Jiang J, Cui J and Ling Q: Cancer cell-derived exosomal miR-519a/522-5p promotes pancreatic cancer progression by enhancing warburg effect. Ann Surg Oncol. 32:7068–7081. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wu J: Pancreatic cancer-derived exosomes promote the proliferation, invasion, and metastasis of pancreatic cancer by the miR-3960/TFAP2A axis. J Oncol. 2022:35903262022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Liu P, Zu F, Chen H, Yin X and Tan X: Exosomal DNAJB11 promotes the development of pancreatic cancer by modulating the EGFR/MAPK pathway. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 27:872022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chen Y, Lei Y, Li J, Wang X and Li G: Macrophage-derived exosomal microRNAs promote metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Int Immunopharmacol. 129:1115902024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yang Y, Guo Z, Chen W, Wang X, Cao M, Han X, Zhang K, Teng B, Cao J, Wu W, et al: M2 macrophage-derived exosomes promote angiogenesis and growth of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma by targeting E2F2. Mol Ther. 29:1226–1238. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang T, Ye L, Zhou Y, Zhang X, Li R, Zhou Y, Weng J, Mo Q and Yu Y: Pancreatic cancer-derived exosomal miR-510 promotes macrophage M2 polarization and facilitates cancer cell aggressive phenotypes. Hum Cell. 38:172024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
He Z, Wang J, Zhu C, Xu J, Chen P, Jiang X, Chen Y, Jiang J and Sun C: Exosome-derived FGD5-AS1 promotes tumor-associated macrophage M2 polarization-mediated pancreatic cancer cell proliferation and metastasis. Cancer Lett. 548:2157512022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yang W, Zheng Y, Zhou H, Liang R and Hu C: Cancer-associated fibroblast-secreted exosomes regulate macrophage polarization in pancreatic cancer via the NOD1 pathway. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 39:e701262025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhong D, Liao Y, Chen W, Huang X, Liu J and Wang Z: TYROBP promotes the spread of pancreatic cancer by causing M2 TAM polarization. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 39:2926–2939. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang C, Xu S and Qin Y: Tumor-derived exosome PPP3CB induce gemcitabine resistance by regulating miR-298/STAT3 in pancreatic cancer. Heliyon. 10:e364342024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Bhattacharya S, Pal K, Sharma AK, Dutta SK, Lau JS, Yan IK, Wang E, Elkhanany A, Alkharfy KM, Sanyal A, et al: GAIP interacting protein C-terminus regulates autophagy and exosome biogenesis of pancreatic cancer through metabolic pathways. PLoS One. 9:e1144092014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yang Z, Zhao N, Cui J, Wu H, Xiong J and Peng T: Exosomes derived from cancer stem cells of gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer cells enhance drug resistance by delivering miR-210. Cell Oncol (Dordr). 43:123–136. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Qi R, Bai Y, Li K, Liu N, Xu Y, Dal E, Wang Y, Lin R, Wang H, Liu Z, et al: Cancer-associated fibroblasts suppress ferroptosis and induce gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer cells by secreting exosome-derived ACSL4-targeting miRNAs. Drug Resist Updat. 68:1009602023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Mikamori M, Yamada D, Eguchi H, Hasegawa S, Kishimoto T, Tomimaru Y, Asaoka T, Noda T, Wada H, Kawamoto K, et al: MicroRNA-155 controls exosome synthesis and promotes gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Sci Rep. 7:423392017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Xu S, Peng X, Wang Z, Le C, Wu X, Zeng Z, Zeng S, Zhang C, Qiu M, Zou X, et al: FABP7-mediated lipid-laden macrophages drive the formation of pre-metastatic niche and liver metastasis. Int J Biol Sci. 21:4388–4409. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yang Y, Gu H, Zhang K, Guo Z, Wang X, Wei Q, Weng L, Han X, Lv Y, Cao M, et al: Exosomal ACADM sensitizes gemcitabine-resistance through modulating fatty acid metabolism and ferroptosis in pancreatic cancer. BMC Cancer. 23:7892023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Mashouri L, Yousefi H, Aref AR, Ahadi AM, Molaei F and Alahari SK: Exosomes: Composition, biogenesis, and mechanisms in cancer metastasis and drug resistance. Mol Cancer. 18:752019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Adamska A, Elaskalani O, Emmanouilidi A, Kim M, Abdol Razak NB, Metharom P and Falasca M: Molecular and cellular mechanisms of chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer. Adv Biol Regul. 68:77–87. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Fan J, Wei Q, Koay EJ, Liu Y, Ning B, Bernard PW, Zhang N, Han H, Katz MH, Zhao Z and Hu Y: Chemoresistance transmission via exosome-mediated EphA2 transfer in pancreatic cancer. Theranostics. 8:5986–5994. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Guo W, Ying P, Ma R, Jing Z, Ma G, Long J, Li G and Liu Z: Liquid biopsy analysis of lipometabolic exosomes in pancreatic cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 73:69–77. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Søreide K, Ismail W, Roalsø M, Ghotbi J and Zaharia C: Early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: Clinical premonitions, timely precursor detection and increased curative-intent surgery. Cancer Control. 30:107327482311547112023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Fang X, Lan H, Jin K and Qian J: Pancreatic cancer and exosomes: role in progression, diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment. Front Oncol. 13:11495512023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Odaka H, Hiemori K, Shimoda A, Akiyoshi K and Tateno H: CD63-positive extracellular vesicles are potential diagnostic biomarkers of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. BMC Gastroenterol. 22:1532022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chen J, Yao D, Chen W, Li Z, Guo Y, Zhu F and Hu X: Serum exosomal miR-451a acts as a candidate marker for pancreatic cancer. Int J Biol Markers. 37:74–80. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yoshioka Y, Shimomura M, Saito K, Ishii H, Doki Y, Eguchi H, Nakatsura T, Itoi T, Kuroda M, Mori M and Ochiya T: Circulating cancer-associated extracellular vesicles as early detection and recurrence biomarkers for pancreatic cancer. Cancer Sci. 113:3498–3509. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Hong L, Xu L, Jin L, Xu K, Tang W, Zhu Y, Qiu X and Wang J: Exosomal circular RNA hsa_circ_0006220, and hsa_circ_0001666 as biomarkers in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. J Clin Lab Anal. 36:e244472022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Taniguchi T, Ideno N, Araki T, Miura S, Yamamoto M, Nakafusa T, Higashijima N, Yamamoto T, Tamura K, Nakamura S, et al: MicroRNA-20a in extracellular vesicles derived from duodenal fluid is a possible biomarker for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. DEN Open. 4:e3332024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Di Pace AL, Pelosi A, Fiore PF, Tumino N, Besi F, Quatrini L, Santopolo S, Vacca P and Moretta L: MicroRNA analysis of Natural Killer cell-derived exosomes: the microRNA let-7b-5p is enriched in exosomes and participates in their anti-tumor effects against pancreatic cancer cells. Oncoimmunology. 12:22210812023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Hasoglu I and Karatug Kacar A: The therapeutic effects of exosomes the first time isolated from pancreatic islet-derived progenitor cells in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Protoplasma. 261:281–291. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zheng Y, Zou X, Li Q, Jiang D, Zhu F and Wu Y: Exosomes derived from umbilical cord blood NK cells inhibit the progression of pancreatic cancer by targeting ROS-mediated mitochondrial dysfunction. Saudi Pharm J. 33:82025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Xu Y, Liu N, Wei Y, Zhou D, Lin R, Wang X and Shi B: Anticancer effects of miR-124 delivered by BM-MSC derived exosomes on cell proliferation, epithelial mesenchymal transition, and chemotherapy sensitivity of pancreatic cancer cells. Aging (Albany NY). 12:19660–19676. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Tang ZG, Chen TM, Lu Y, Wang Z, Wang XC and Kong Y: Human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes loaded with gemcitabine inhibit pancreatic cancer cell proliferation by enhancing apoptosis. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 16:4006–4013. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhao Y, Zheng Y, Zhu Y, Zhang Y, Zhu H and Liu T: M1 macrophage-derived exosomes loaded with gemcitabine and deferasirox against chemoresistant pancreatic cancer. Pharmaceutics. 13:14932021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Li YJ, Wu JY, Wang JM, Hu XB, Cai JX and Xiang DX: Gemcitabine loaded autologous exosomes for effective and safe chemotherapy of pancreatic cancer. Acta Biomater. 101:519–530. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhan T, Zou Y, Han Z, Tian X, Chen M, Liu J, Yang X, Zhu Q, Liu M, Chen W, et al: Single-cell sequencing combined with spatial transcriptomics reveals that the IRF7 gene in M1 macrophages inhibits the occurrence of pancreatic cancer by regulating lipid metabolism-related mechanisms. Clin Transl Med. 14:e17992024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Li S, Dong R, Kang Z, Li H, Wu X and Li T: Exosomes: Another intercellular lipometabolic communication mediators in digestive system neoplasms? Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 73:93–100. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Li J, Li Y, Chen S, Duan W, Kong X, Wang Y, Zhou L, Li P, Zhang C, Du L and Wang C: Highly sensitive exosome detection for early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer using immunoassay based on hierarchical surface-enhanced raman scattering substrate. Small Methods. 6:e22001542022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yu Z, Yang Y, Fang W, Hu P, Liu Y and Shi J: Dual tumor exosome biomarker co-recognitions based nanoliquid biopsy for the accurate early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. ACS Nano. 17:11384–11395. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yin T, Xu L, Gil B, Merali N, Sokolikova MS, Gaboriau DCA, Liu DSK, Muhammad Mustafa AN, Alodan S, Chen M, et al: Graphene sensor arrays for rapid and accurate detection of pancreatic cancer exosomes in patients' blood plasma samples. ACS Nano. 17:14619–14631. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Jabbari N, Karimipour M, Khaksar M, Akbariazar E, Heidarzadeh M, Mojarad B, Aftab H, Rahbarghazi R and Rezaie J: Tumor-derived extracellular vesicles: Insights into bystander effects of exosomes after irradiation. Lasers Med Sci. 35:531–545. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Jabbari N, Akbariazar E, Feqhhi M, Rahbarghazi R and Rezaie J: Breast cancer-derived exosomes: Tumor progression and therapeutic agents. J Cell Physiol. 235:6345–6356. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sun M, Zhang H, Ma Y, Wang S, Chen J, Cui Y, Zhang Y, Hu S, Zhou D, Zhang P, et al: In situ programming of the tumor microenvironment to alleviate immunosuppression for pancreatic cancer immunotherapy. Adv Sci (Weinh). 12:e040082025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
van Niel G, Carter DRF, Clayton A, Lambert DW, Raposo G and Vader P: Challenges and directions in studying cell-cell communication by extracellular vesicles. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 23:369–382. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Royo F, Théry C, Falcón-Pérez JM, Nieuwland R and Witwer KW: Methods for separation and characterization of extracellular vesicles: Results of a worldwide survey performed by the ISEV rigor and standardization subcommittee. Cells. 9:19552020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ramirez MI, Amorim MG, Gadelha C, Milic I, Welsh JA, Freitas VM, Nawaz M, Akbar N, Couch Y, Makin L, et al: Technical challenges of working with extracellular vesicles. Nanoscale. 10:881–906. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ghanam J, Chetty VK, Zhu X, Liu X, Gelléri M, Barthel L, Reinhardt D, Cremer C and Thakur BK: Single molecule localization microscopy for studying small extracellular vesicles. Small. 19:e22050302023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhang YP, Lobanova E, Dworkin A, Furlepa M, Yang WS, Burke M, Meng JX, Potter N, Sala RL, Kahanawita L, et al: Improved imaging surface for quantitative single-molecule microscopy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 16:37255–37264. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ju Y, Hu Y, Yang P, Xie X and Fang B: Extracellular vesicle-loaded hydrogels for tissue repair and regeneration. Mater Today Bio. 18:1005222022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lu Y, Zhou H, Han C, Gong Y, Li Y, Xia Y, Liang B, Yang H and Wang Z: Enhanced therapeutic impact of Shikonin-encapsulated exosomes in the inhibition of colorectal cancer progression. Nanotechnology. 35:2024. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Zhao B, Lin H, Jiang X, Li W, Gao Y, Li M, Yu Y, Chen N and Gao J: Exosome-like nanoparticles derived from fruits, vegetables, and herbs: Innovative strategies of therapeutic and drug delivery. Theranostics. 14:4598–4621. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Liang Y, Duan L, Lu J and Xia J: Engineering exosomes for targeted drug delivery. Theranostics. 11:3183–3195. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Herrmann IK, Wood MJA and Fuhrmann G: Extracellular vesicles as a next-generation drug delivery platform. Nat Nanotechnol. 16:748–759. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Phutela K, Bal A, Singh N and Sharma S: Hydroxycitrate-loaded exosomes demonstrate enhanced therapeutic efficacy against lung adenocarcinoma by inhibiting the metabolic enzyme ATP citrate lyase. Nanoscale Adv. 7:3846–3858. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Mohammed O, Ahmed Assaye M, Alemayehu E, Tufa A and Genet S: Exosomes in cancer metabolism and drug resistance: A review. Biomol Biomed. 26:730–745. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |