International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.
International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.
Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.
Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.
Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.
Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.
International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.
Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.
Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.
Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.
An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.
Gynecological malignancies represent a major threat to health, with ovarian, endometrial cancer and cervical cancer ranking among the most prevalent and lethal neoplasms of the female reproductive tract (1–3). Statistics indicate that >1.3 million new cases of gynecological malignancies and nearly 500,000 associated deaths are reported globally each year. Ovarian cancer, in particular, is characterized by insidious onset and challenges in early diagnosis, with >70% of patients presenting at an advanced stage (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III/IV) at the time of diagnosis (4,5). While primary debulking surgery combined with platinum-based chemotherapy can achieve initial remission, the postoperative recurrence rate of ovarian cancer is >70%, with a 5-year survival rate of only ~30%. Platinum resistance stands as the primary bottleneck contributing to treatment failure (6,7). Endometrial cancer has witnessed a steady rise in incidence, with obesity-associated type I endometrial cancer (Bokhman classification) accounting for >80% of cases and conferring a poor prognosis (8). For advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer, therapeutic options remain limited, as immune checkpoint inhibitors only benefit a subset of patients with mismatch repair-deficient subtypes (9). Although early intervention for cervical cancer is feasible through human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and screening, high-risk subtypes associated with persistent HPV infection (such as HPV16/18) still pose a risk of disease progression (10–12). Chemoradiotherapy resistance and lymph node metastasis remain critical factors limiting patient outcomes. Collectively, the interplay between subtype heterogeneity, therapeutic resistance and metabolic dysregulation constitutes the core impediment to favorable clinical outcomes in gynecological malignancies (13,14).
Metabolic reprogramming, a hallmark of malignant tumors, is closely linked to tumor initiation, progression, metastasis and drug resistance (15–17). As a key component of metabolic reprogramming, lipid metabolic dysregulation has been identified as a critical biological feature of gynecological malignancies (18). Beyond providing energy and structural building blocks for rapid tumor cell proliferation, lipid metabolism exerts multifaceted effects on tumor progression through metabolite-mediated signal transduction and tumor microenvironment (TME) remodeling (19). Studies have demonstrated that gynecological cancer cells actively rewire their lipid metabolic networks, encompassing lipid uptake, synthesis, storage and catabolism, to adapt to stressors such as nutrient deprivation and hypoxia within the TME (20,21). Notably, distinct subtypes of gynecological cancers exhibit marked phenotypic heterogeneity in lipid metabolism due to differences in genetic background, etiological factors (for example, obesity association and HPV infection) and TME characteristics (22,23). For instance, obesity-associated endometrial cancer is characterized by sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1 (SREBP1)-driven enhanced lipogenesis, while ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is marked by abnormal lipid droplet accumulation and reliance on exogenous fatty acid uptake (24,25). By contrast, HPV-positive cervical cancer displays increased low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR)-mediated cholesterol uptake (26). This subtype-specific lipid metabolic reprogramming not only contributes to malignant transformation but also closely associates with therapeutic resistance; for example, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer cells exhibit disrupted cholesterol homeostasis and activated fatty acid oxidation (FAO), while progesterone resistance in endometrial cancer correlates with fatty acid synthase (FASN)-mediated enhanced fatty acid synthesis (27–29).
In recent years, lipid metabolism-targeted therapeutic strategies have emerged as a research focus in oncology. Several inhibitors targeting key lipid metabolic enzymes [for example, FASN, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR) and stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD1)] have advanced to preclinical or early-phase clinical trials, with some demonstrating notable antitumor activity and reversal of drug resistance in gynecological cancer models (30,31). However, significant gaps remain in current research: The subtype-specific regulatory networks of lipid metabolism in gynecological malignancies are not fully elucidated, the crosstalk mechanisms between lipid metabolism and other oncogenic pathways (for example, PI3K/Akt/mTOR and Hippo-YAP) require further investigation, and precision targeting strategies based on lipid metabolic profiles have not been widely translated into clinical practice (32). Therefore, systematically summarizing the subtype-specific features of lipid metabolic dysregulation in gynecological malignancies, elaborating on the underlying molecular regulatory mechanisms, and synthesizing the progress of lipid metabolism-targeted interventions and their clinical translation hold theoretical and clinical importance for advancing precision medicine and improving patient outcomes. The present review focuses on the subtype-specific characteristics of lipid metabolism, core regulatory mechanisms, associations with malignant phenotypes and targeted intervention strategies in gynecological cancers, aiming to provide insights for basic research and clinical translation in this field.
Distinct gynecological malignancies and even different subtypes within the same tumor exhibit marked heterogeneity in lipid metabolic reprogramming patterns (33). This heterogeneity stems from intrinsic differences in genetic background, TME characteristics and etiological mechanisms and exerts a direct impact on tumor biological behavior, therapeutic sensitivity and patient prognosis.
Ovarian cancer encompasses diverse pathological subtypes, among which high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), OCCC and endometrioid carcinoma are the three most clinically prevalent subtypes. Each subtype displays distinct divergence in lipid metabolic profiles (34,35). HGSOC accounts for >70% of all ovarian cancer cases, with enhanced FAO as its core metabolic phenotype. Tumor cells adapt to nutrient deprivation and hypoxic stress in the ascites microenvironment by activating the FAO pathway to efficiently utilize fatty acids for energy production (36). Studies have confirmed that the expression of carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1 (CPT1), a key rate-limiting enzyme in FAO, is significantly upregulated in HGSOC cells (37). CPT1 facilitates the translocation of long-chain fatty acids across the mitochondrial membrane and initiates their oxidative breakdown; silencing CPT1 directly inhibits tumor cell proliferation, colony formation and peritoneal metastatic capacity (38). Additionally, HGSOC exhibits aberrant cholesterol uptake: High expression of the LDLR positively correlates with a poor patient prognosis. Serum levels of LDL and total cholesterol in platinum-resistant patients are markedly higher than those in sensitive populations. Enhanced LDLR-mediated exogenous cholesterol uptake may maintain cell membrane stability and reduce drug-induced lipid peroxidation damage, thereby contributing to the development of a resistant phenotype (39,40).
OCCC is characterized by a hallmark feature of abnormal lipid storage: Lipid droplets accumulate extensively within tumor cells, and high expression of the lipid droplet-associated protein adipophilin is correlated with shortened progression-free survival in patients (41). Mechanistic investigations reveal that acyl-CoA cholesterol acyltransferase 1 (ACAT1) is upregulated in OCCC cells, promoting the esterification of free cholesterol for storage in lipid droplets (42,43). This process not only avoids the cytotoxicity of free cholesterol but also enables rapid breakdown for energy supply under nutrient deficiency, conferring a metabolic adaptive advantage. Meanwhile, OCCC cells exhibit low expression of FASN and rely more heavily on exogenous fatty acid uptake, with enhanced CD36-mediated free fatty acid (FFA) transport playing a pivotal regulatory role in tumor proliferation and invasion (44–46).
The endometrioid ovarian cancer subtype shares a strong association with obesity, with enhanced lipogenesis as its core lipid metabolic feature. As a master transcription factor (47), SREBP1 drives the activation of fatty acid synthesis pathways, upregulating the expression of key enzymes such as FASN and acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) (48,49). This promotes de novo fatty acid synthesis, providing membrane structural building blocks and energy support for rapid tumor cell proliferation (50). Collectively, the three major ovarian cancer subtypes exhibit distinct lipid metabolic dependencies: HGSOC relies on FAO-mediated energy production and exogenous cholesterol uptake for survival in the ascites microenvironment; OCCC is characterized by extensive lipid droplet accumulation and dependence on exogenous fatty acid uptake; while endometrioid ovarian cancer shows SREBP1-driven enhanced de novo lipogenesis associated with obesity. These divergent metabolic phenotypes directly contribute to their differences in biological behavior, therapeutic sensitivity and patient prognosis.
Endometrial cancer is categorized into two subtypes based on etiological features: Type I (estrogen-dependent) and type II (estrogen-independent), and these two subtypes exhibit striking divergence in patterns of lipid metabolic dysregulation. Type I endometrial cancer accounts for ~80% of all endometrial cancer cases and shows a strong association with metabolic syndrome, including obesity, diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia (51,52). A core feature of this subtype is enhanced de novo lipogenesis as the primary lipid metabolic abnormality. Studies have demonstrated that type I tumors exhibit markedly elevated expression of SREBP1, a master transcription factor that directly binds to the promoter regions of key lipogenic enzymes such as FASN and SCD1, thereby activating de novo fatty acid synthesis (53). The hyperestrogenic microenvironment induced by obesity enhances the nuclear localization and transcriptional activity of SREBP1, forming a positive regulatory loop termed the ‘estrogen-SREBP1-lipogenesis axis’ that continuously drives tumor progression. Additionally, type I endometrial cancer is accompanied by cholesterol metabolic disorders: Upregulated expression of HMGCR promotes endogenous cholesterol synthesis, while statins, by inhibiting HMGCR activity, can markedly suppress tumor cell proliferation and induce apoptosis (54).
Type II endometrial cancer, predominantly composed of serous carcinoma, displays lipid metabolic traits that are distinctly different from those of type I (55). This subtype exhibits substantially enhanced lipid uptake capacity, with upregulated expression of CD36 and fatty acid transport protein 2 (FATP2) enabling efficient scavenging of FFAs from the tumor microenvironment to meet metabolic demands. Concurrently, the level of FAO in type II tumor cells is markedly higher than in type I tumor cells, and increased expression of CPT1A correlates with a poor patient prognosis (56,57). Inhibition of FAO has been shown to enhance the sensitivity of these tumor cells to chemotherapeutic agents. Furthermore, studies have revealed that type II endometrial cancer exhibits reduced expression of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) subfamily A member 1, a protein involved in cholesterol efflux. This downregulation leads to abnormal intracellular cholesterol accumulation, which activates the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway to augment the tumor's invasive and metastatic potential (58–60). In summary, type I and type II endometrial cancers exhibit fundamentally different lipid metabolic profiles: Type I tumors are characterized by SREBP1-mediated enhanced de novo lipogenesis driven by obesity and hyperestrogenism, while type II tumors rely on increased lipid uptake and FAO for energy supply. These metabolic differences underlie their distinct responses to hormonal therapy and chemotherapy.
Cervical cancer development is associated with persistent HPV infection, with HPV16 and HPV18 as the primary high-risk subtypes (61,62). Abnormal lipid metabolism in these tumors is specifically regulated by HPV oncoproteins, featuring a distinct signature centered on cholesterol metabolic reprogramming. Mechanistic studies demonstrate that the HPV E7 oncoprotein upregulates LDLR expression at the transcriptional level while suppressing the transcription of ABC sub-family G member 1, a gene critical for cholesterol efflux. This dual regulation leads to abnormal intracellular cholesterol accumulation, which in turn activates lipid raft-associated c-Src/AKT/FAK signaling pathways to enhance tumor cell migration and invasion (63,64). Additionally, HPV-positive cervical cancer cells exhibit markedly elevated expression of FASN; enhanced fatty acid synthesis driven by FASN promotes lymphangiogenesis, thereby augmenting the potential for lymph node metastasis (65).
Based on histological features, cervical cancer is classified into squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma subtypes, each with distinct lipid metabolic traits (66,67). Squamous cell carcinoma relies more heavily on FAO for energy production: Upregulated expression of acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 3 (ACSL3) facilitates the activation of long-chain fatty acids and their translocation into mitochondrial oxidative pathways, supplying the energy required for tumor proliferation (68). By contrast, adenocarcinoma is characterized by enhanced lipogenesis, with markedly higher expression of SREBP1 and FASN compared with that in squamous cell carcinoma; targeted inhibition of FASN effectively suppresses its proliferative activity (69). Due to the absence of HPV oncoprotein regulation, HPV-negative cervical cancer exhibits a lipid metabolic pattern analogous to other solid tumors, with enhanced lipid uptake as a core feature. This allows tumor cells to efficiently utilize exogenous lipids to meet their metabolic demands (70–72). Notably, the two major histological subtypes of cervical cancer display divergent lipid metabolic traits: Squamous cell carcinoma depends on ACSL3-mediated FAO for energy production, while adenocarcinoma is characterized by SREBP1-driven enhanced lipogenesis. HPV-negative cervical cancer, lacking the regulation of viral oncoproteins, exhibits a metabolic pattern dominated by enhanced lipid uptake, similar to other solid tumors.
To facilitate a clear understanding of the heterogeneous lipid metabolic profiles across gynecological malignancies, a comprehensive table comparing the core metabolic phenotypes, key regulatory molecules, functional impacts and potential targeted agents for each major subtype is presented as Table I.
Table I.Subtype-specific lipid metabolic features and potential targeted interventions in gynecological malignancies. |
Gynecological cancer cells actively rewire their lipid metabolic networks by selectively modulating core processes such as lipid uptake, synthesis, storage and catabolism, thereby meeting the demands for malignant proliferation, TME adaptation and therapeutic resistance (73). These abnormally activated metabolic processes are not isolated; instead, they are synergistically regulated by multiple signaling pathways and transcription factors, forming an interconnected and complex molecular regulatory network (74,75).
Lipid uptake serves as the initiating and rate-limiting step in tumor cell lipid metabolism. Gynecological cancer cells selectively upregulate the expression and function of lipid transporters to markedly boost the efficiency of exogenous lipid uptake, providing abundant substrates for subsequent metabolic reprogramming and laying a material foundation for malignant tumor progression (76,77).
CD36, a key molecule mediating transmembrane fatty acid transport, is commonly overexpressed in gynecological malignancies such as ovarian and cervical cancer. CD36 specifically mediates the selective uptake of FFAs, particularly unsaturated fatty acids (78). In ovarian cancer, direct contact between omental adipocytes and tumor cells can induce CD36 upregulation in tumor cells via paracrine signaling, enhancing fatty acid uptake efficiency to support energy metabolism during peritoneal metastasis (79). VT1021, a specific CD36 inhibitor, has entered early-phase clinical trials, aiming to inhibit tumor progression by blocking lipid uptake (80).
Abnormal LDLR-mediated cholesterol uptake is one of the key mechanisms underlying platinum resistance in ovarian cancer: Platinum-resistant ovarian cancer cells exhibit markedly elevated LDLR expression, while the expression of HMGCR, a key enzyme in endogenous cholesterol synthesis, is downregulated. This forms a metabolic adaptation pattern characterized by ‘enhanced exogenous cholesterol uptake and reduced endogenous synthesis’, which maintains cell membrane stability and sustains the resistant phenotype (81,82). Studies have confirmed that silencing tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated protein 1 can mimic this resistant phenotype by upregulating LDLR to enhance cholesterol uptake while suppressing the transcriptional activity of cholesterol synthesis-related genes (83). Additionally, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) binds to the extracellular domain of LDLR and promotes its intracellular degradation; reduced PCSK9 expression in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer cells further prolongs the cell membrane residence time of LDLR, boosting its cholesterol uptake efficiency (82).
The FATP family exhibits distinct subtype-specific expression patterns in gynecological cancer: FATP2 is upregulated in ovarian cancer cells, and its specific inhibitor lipofermata can markedly suppress tumor cell proliferation and invasion by blocking long-chain fatty acid uptake. In obesity-associated subtypes of endometrial cancer, FATP1 expression is elevated, which is closely linked to the phenotype of enhanced lipid metabolism and serves as a potential metabolic biomarker for this subtype (84). Fatty acid-binding proteins (FABPs) are responsible for the intracellular targeted transport of lipids. Among them, FABP4 is highly expressed in ovarian cancer, mediating the efficient translocation of lipids from the cell membrane to lipid droplets (85,86). This not only avoids the accumulation of lipid toxicity but also improves the efficiency of tumor cell utilization of TME lipids, providing metabolic support for tumor progression.
Enhanced lipogenesis stands as the most distinctive metabolic aberration in gynecological malignancies, primarily involving two core pathways, fatty acid synthesis and cholesterol synthesis, both under the pivotal regulation of the SREBP family of transcription factors (87). Among these, SREBP1 primarily governs fatty acid synthesis and is aberrantly upregulated in gynecological cancers such as endometrial and ovarian cancer. SREBP1 specifically binds to the promoter regions of downstream target genes, activating the transcription and expression of key enzymes, including FASN, ACC and SCD1 (88). As the rate-limiting enzyme in de novo fatty acid synthesis, FASN is markedly upregulated in gynecological malignancy, such as cervical cancer (89). FASN catalyzes the condensation of acetyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA to produce palmitic acid, a core building block for tumor cell membrane synthesis and signaling molecule production (90). TVB-2640, a targeted inhibitor of FASN, has demonstrated notable therapeutic activity in HGSOC; when combined with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, it exerts a synergistic effect by suppressing metabolic reprogramming and DNA damage repair, further enhancing antitumor efficacy (91).
SCD1, a key enzyme in fatty acid desaturation, converts saturated fatty acids into monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs); its upregulation in ovarian cancer promotes tumor progression by enhancing cell membrane fluidity and attenuating ferroptosis-associated lipid peroxidation (92,93). Inhibition of SCD1 markedly reduces MUFA content in membrane phospholipids, decreases the production of the antioxidant molecule coenzyme Q10, disrupts cellular redox homeostasis, and ultimately induces the accumulation of lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis. A939572, a specific SCD1 inhibitor, has shown promising antitumor effects in preclinical ovarian cancer models, offering a novel direction for the treatment of drug-resistant tumors (94). In the cholesterol synthesis pathway, HMGCR acts as the rate-limiting enzyme; its abnormal expression is closely associated with the malignant progression of cervical and ovarian cancer. Statins, commonly used clinical lipid-lowering agents, can block cholesterol synthesis by inhibiting HMGCR activity, which not only markedly suppresses tumor cell proliferation but also enhances the cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs, exerting a synergistic therapeutic effect (95).
The aberrant activation of lipid synthesis is further subject to hierarchical regulation by multiple oncogenic signaling pathways (96). Additionally, TP53 mutations can enhance the transcriptional activity of SREBP1 while downregulating the expression of fatty acid degradation-related genes (97,98), leading to abnormal lipid accumulation in ovarian cancer cells and the formation of a metabolic addiction phenotype (99).
Lipid droplets serve as core intracellular organelles for lipid storage and metabolic regulation, and exhibit an abnormal accumulation phenomenon in gynecological cancer cells (100,101). The functions of lipid droplets extend beyond mere lipid storage, as they actively participate in regulating tumor progression by dynamically adjusting lipid metabolic balance (102). In ovarian cancer, the expression level of the lipid droplet-associated marker adipophilin is markedly elevated, and this upregulation correlates positively with a poor patient prognosis (103). Inhibitors targeting ACAT1 and HMGCR can block cholesterol esterification and synthesis, respectively, thereby suppressing lipid droplet accumulation in ovarian cancer cells and inhibiting tumor growth. The formation of lipid droplets is associated with cholesterol esterification. ACAT2 is highly expressed in serous ovarian cancer; it converts free cholesterol into cholesterol esters for storage in lipid droplets, thus avoiding the cytotoxicity induced by free cholesterol (104). Lipid droplets form dynamic contact sites with mitochondria to facilitate direct fatty acid transfer for oxidation. This interaction is particularly prominent in cells, supporting their survival under nutrient stress by enhancing FAO efficiency (105,106). The expression level of ACAT2 is positively correlated with chemoresistance in ovarian cancer. Additionally, the phosphatidylcholine synthesis mediated by choline kinase α (CHKα) can promote lipid droplet formation by regulating membrane lipid composition, while dehydrogenase/reductase SDR family member 2 inhibits lipid droplet accumulation and peritoneal metastasis in ovarian cancer cells by downregulating CHKα expression (107,108).
FAO is the core pathway of lipid catabolism and serves an indispensable role in enabling adaptation to the TME and sustaining survival advantages in gynecological cancers (109). Ovarian cancer cells exhibit a distinct feature of enhanced FAO in the ascites microenvironment (110). The translocation of long-chain fatty acids across the mitochondrial membrane, mediated by CPT1, is the rate-limiting step of FAO (111). Etomoxir, a CPT1 inhibitor, can block this process, markedly suppressing the proliferation and survival of ovarian cancer cells under the nutrient-depleted conditions of ascites. Mitochondrial dynamics (fusion and fission) directly regulate FAO efficiency by modulating the assembly of oxidative enzyme complexes. Enhanced mitochondrial fusion in ovarian cancer cells promotes FAO flux and confers chemoresistance, while mitochondrial fission impairs lipid oxidation and induces lipid accumulation (112,113). Studies have confirmed that adipocytes within the ovarian cancer ascites microenvironment secrete FFAs to serve as metabolic substrates for tumor cells (114,115). Tumor cells efficiently utilize these fatty acids by enhancing FAO, while simultaneously activating the AMPK signaling pathway to drive downstream oncogenic signal transduction, forming a vicious cycle of TME lipids-tumor metabolism-signal activation. In endometrial cancer, the upregulated expression of ACSL1 facilitates the activation of long-chain fatty acids and their entry into the FAO pathway, providing sufficient energy for tumor cells. Silencing ACSL1 can significantly inhibit tumor proliferation and metastatic capacity by suppressing FAO activity (116–118).
The dynamic balance between lipid storage and catabolism is dynamically regulated by the nutritional status of the TME. Under nutrient deprivation, tumor cells can rapidly decompose triglycerides and cholesterol esters stored in lipid droplets through lipolysis, releasing FFAs for energy supply. Adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL) and hormone-sensitive lipase are the core enzymes mediating lipolysis, and both are highly expressed in ovarian cancer (119,120). Inhibiting ATGL can markedly reduce fatty acid release, impairing the survival ability of tumor cells under nutrient-deficient conditions. Furthermore, autophagy (lipophagy) participates in lipid catabolism through the selective degradation of lipid droplets (121). Ovarian cancer cells can activate lipophagy under stress conditions such as hypoxia and nutrient deprivation, converting degraded lipids into energy and metabolic raw materials to provide necessary support for tumor progression (122,123).
The aberrant reprogramming of lipid metabolism is orchestrated by the synergistic regulation of multiple oncogenic signaling pathways, with distinct subtype-specific effects. As a classic oncogenic pathway, the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway modulates lipid metabolism via multi-layered, multi-target mechanisms (124,125). Upon activation, it phosphorylates and activates SREBP1, promoting its nuclear translocation and initiating the transcription of lipid synthesis-related genes (126,127). In ovarian cancer, aberrant activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway concurrently upregulates the expression of FASN and SCD1, enhancing fatty acid synthesis efficiency while inhibiting the activity of lipolysis-related enzymes (128). This leads to abnormal lipid accumulation, providing both material and energy support for tumor proliferation.
The Hippo-YAP/TAZ pathway directly regulates lipid metabolism by targeting SREBP1 and key metabolic enzymes. YAP/TAZ can bind to the promoter region of SREBP1, facilitating its transcriptional activation and thereby enhancing fatty acid synthesis (129,130). In ovarian cancer cells, aberrant YAP activation upregulates ATP-citrate lyase, which promotes the conversion of citrate to acetyl-CoA, the core precursor for lipid synthesis, while simultaneously boosting the tumor's invasive and metastatic capacity (131,132). Furthermore, YAP regulates the expression of lipid droplet-associated genes (such as perilipin 1), promoting lipid droplet accumulation and strengthening the resistance of tumor cells to chemotherapeutic agents (133).
The Nrf2/Keap1 pathway, a central regulator of cellular oxidative stress (Fig. 1), precisely modulates lipid metabolic homeostasis (134). Activated Nrf2 upregulates the expression of SCD1 and glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4), enhancing tumor cell resistance to ferroptosis through dual mechanisms: Increased MUFA synthesis and suppressed lipid peroxidation. In ovarian cancer, aberrant activation of this pathway is associated with platinum resistance (135,136). Additionally, Nrf2 promotes cholesterol efflux by upregulating ABCG1 expression, maintaining intracellular cholesterol homeostasis and averting cytotoxicity induced by excessive intracellular cholesterol (137,138).
Dysregulated lipid metabolism in gynecological malignancies is not merely a consequence of metabolic adaptation; instead, it is deeply involved in regulating core malignant phenotypes, including proliferation, metastasis, therapeutic resistance, ferroptosis resistance and immune evasion, through multiple mechanisms such as providing energy substrates, mediating signaling pathway activation, regulating cell death modes and remodeling the tumor immune microenvironment (139,140). This association exhibits distinct tumor subtype specificity, offering clear theoretical basis and therapeutic targets for precision targeted intervention.
Aberrant lipid metabolism fuels the malignant proliferation, invasion and metastasis of gynecological cancer cells via the dual mechanisms of ‘energy supply-signal regulation’ (141). At the level of fatty acid synthesis, palmitic acid generated by enhanced lipogenesis can directly activate the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, promoting the transition of ovarian cancer cells from the G1 phase to the S phase of the cell cycle and accelerating proliferation (142). By contrast, FASN inhibitors block this signaling axis by reducing palmitic acid production, arresting tumor cells in the G1 phase and suppressing proliferative activity. In endometrial cancer, SREBP1-mediated enhanced lipogenesis activates the epithelial-mesenchymal transition process by promoting the degradation of E-cadherin and upregulating the expression of N-cadherin, thereby enhancing the invasive capacity of tumor cells (143,144).
Abnormal cholesterol metabolism, in turn, promotes metastasis by regulating membrane-associated signaling pathways (145). In ovarian cancer cells, enhanced LDLR-mediated cholesterol uptake enriches lipid raft structures in the cell membrane, activating the RhoA/ROCK signaling pathway to facilitate actin cytoskeleton reorganization and improve cell motility and invasiveness (146). In cervical cancer, FASN regulates cholesterol reprogramming to exert dual effects: On the one hand, it activates the lipid raft-associated c-Src/AKT/FAK signaling pathway; on the other hand, it promotes the secretion of platelet-derived growth factor-AA and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3, inducing lymphangiogenesis and markedly boosting lymph node metastasis capacity (147). Furthermore, lipid metabolites (for example, oleic acid and cholesterol esters) can upregulate the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) to promote tumor angiogenesis, establishing a nutrient transport network that supports proliferation and metastasis (148,149).
Lipid metabolic reprogramming serves as a central driver underlying resistance to multiple therapeutic modalities in gynecological malignancies, with distinct subtype-specific metabolic aberrations corresponding to different types of treatment resistance (150,151). For platinum resistance in ovarian cancer, disrupted cholesterol homeostasis plays a pivotal role: Platinum-resistant cells exhibit markedly upregulate LDLR expression, which enhances exogenous cholesterol uptake. This metabolic adaptation maintains cell membrane fluidity and stability, reducing DNA cross-linking damage induced by platinum-based drugs. Statins, by inhibiting HMGCR activity, can lower intracellular cholesterol levels and reverse the platinum-resistant phenotype (152,153). Additionally, FASN-mediated enhanced fatty acid synthesis is linked to PARP inhibitor resistance in ovarian cancer. When the FASN inhibitor TVB-2640 is combined with PARP inhibitors, it exerts a synergistic effect by co-suppressing metabolic reprogramming and DNA damage repair pathways, markedly improving the therapeutic response rate in resistant patients (154–156).
Chemoradiotherapy resistance in cervical cancer is predominantly driven by enhanced FAO; chemoradiotherapy induces upregulated CPT1A expression in cervical cancer cells, activating the FAO pathway to augment energy supply and enhance cell survival under therapeutic stress (157–159). Combining the FAO inhibitor etomoxir with chemoradiotherapy blocks this metabolic adaptation, markedly boosting treatment sensitivity. By contrast, hormone therapy resistance in endometrial cancer is associated with exaggerated lipogenesis: Progesterone-resistant cells display abnormally elevated expression of SREBP1 and FASN (160). Enhanced lipogenesis weakens the growth-inhibitory effect of progesterone by activating the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway, while targeted inhibition of lipogenesis can restore tumor cell sensitivity to progesterone. Mechanistically, lipid metabolic reprogramming mediates drug resistance through three core mechanisms: Augmenting the activity of DNA damage repair enzymes, suppressing the activation of apoptotic signaling pathways and sustaining energy metabolic homeostasis (161–163). Mitochondrial lipid metabolism is a key driver of therapeutic resistance. Enhanced FAO provides sufficient ATP for DNA damage repair and increases mitochondrial antioxidant production. Targeting CPT1A, the rate-limiting enzyme of mitochondrial FAO, effectively reverses platinum resistance in cells (164,165).
Ferroptosis is an iron-dependent, lipid peroxidation-mediated form of regulated cell death, and lipid metabolic dysregulation serves as a central regulator in ferroptosis modulation, with this regulatory effect exhibiting distinct tumor subtype specificity (166). SCD1, a key fatty acid desaturase, is upregulated in ovarian cancer (167). The MUFAs catalyzed by SCD1 enhance tumor cell resistance to ferroptosis by decreasing lipid peroxidation accumulation and maintaining cell membrane stability (168). By contrast, SCD1 inhibitors promote ferroptosis induction by increasing polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) accumulation and disrupting redox homeostasis. Studies have confirmed that tumor cells derived from ovarian cancer ascites show markedly elevated expression levels of SCD1 and fatty acid desaturase 2; combined inhibition of these two enzymes downregulates GPX4 expression, triggering an outbreak of lipid peroxidation and initiating ferroptosis (169–171).
Lipid peroxidation is the core event driving ferroptosis, and intracellular PUFA accumulation markedly enhances lipid peroxidation sensitivity, thereby promoting ferroptosis (172,173). In endometrial cancer cells, upregulated expression of ACSL4 facilitates PUFA activation and integration into membrane phospholipids, increasing the risk of lipid peroxidation (174). Consequently, patients with high ACSL4 expression are more sensitive to ferroptosis inducers. By contrast, lipid droplet accumulation reduces lipid peroxidation by sequestering PUFAs. OCCC, characterized by abundant lipid droplets, exhibits inherent resistance to ferroptosis inducers; targeting diacylglycerol acyltransferase 1, a key gene involved in lipid droplet formation, can diminish the sequestration of PUFAs by lipid droplets, enhancing ferroptosis sensitivity (175). This close association between lipid metabolism and ferroptosis offers a novel direction for gynecological cancer treatment. For instance, the combination of SCD1 inhibitors and cisplatin can enhance the cytotoxicity of cisplatin against ovarian cancer by inducing ferroptosis, thereby improving therapeutic outcomes (176).
Abnormal lipid metabolism shapes an immunosuppressive phenotype by regulating immune cell function and altering the composition of the tumor immune microenvironment, ultimately facilitating tumor immune evasion (177). FFAs secreted by gynecological cancer cells are specifically taken up by tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), inducing their polarization toward the M2 phenotype. M2-type TAMs suppress effector T-cell function by secreting anti-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-10 and transforming growth factor-β. In the ovarian cancer microenvironment, lipid-enriched TAMs also abnormally express programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), directly inhibiting the cytotoxic activity of CD8+ T cells via the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 pathway and impairing the antitumor immune response (178,179).
T-cell function is highly regulated by lipid metabolism: Excess fatty acids in the tumor microenvironment are taken up by CD8+ T cells through CD36-mediated pathways, leading to abnormal intracellular lipid accumulation (180,181). This accumulation inhibits T-cell proliferation and the secretion of cytotoxic molecules (such as perforin and granzyme B), inducing T-cell exhaustion. In cervical cancer, enhanced CD36-mediated fatty acid uptake is a key driver of T-cell exhaustion; combining CD36 inhibitors with PD-1 inhibitors can reduce T-cell lipid accumulation, reverse the exhausted phenotype and markedly enhance antitumor immune efficacy (182,183). Additionally, abnormal lipid metabolism in regulatory T cells (Tregs) contributes to immunosuppression: The fatty acid synthesis pathway in Tregs within the ovarian cancer microenvironment is significantly enhanced, sustaining their survival and immunosuppressive function to weaken antitumor immunity (184,185). Targeting key enzymes in fatty acid synthesis can markedly attenuate the immunosuppressive activity of Tregs and improve the immune microenvironment (Fig. 2).
Tumor cell lipid metabolism abnormalities also regulate immune evasion through other mechanisms: FASN inhibitors can downregulate PD-L1 expression on the tumor cell surface, enhancing the recognition and killing of tumor cells by CD8+ T cells (186,187). Abnormal cholesterol accumulation in ovarian cancer inhibits the infiltration and activity of natural killer (NK) cells, while statins can improve NK cell function by regulating cholesterol metabolism, boosting innate immune responses (188,189).
Given the pivotal role of lipid metabolism in the malignant progression and therapeutic resistance of gynecological malignancies, lipid metabolism-targeted intervention strategies have emerged as a research focus in oncology (190,191). These strategies encompass key metabolic enzyme inhibitors, signaling pathway-targeted agents and multi-modal combination therapies, with several approaches, such as FASN inhibitors and statins, having advanced from preclinical research to clinical translation, providing novel technical pathways and clinical evidence for the precision treatment of gynecological cancer (192,193).
Specific inhibitors against key lipid metabolic enzymes represent the most direct intervention strategy. By blocking core processes such as lipid uptake, synthesis and catabolism, these agents disrupt tumor cell metabolic homeostasis to exert antitumor effects. To date, multiple inhibitors have completed preclinical validation in gynecological cancers, with some progressing to clinical trials (194,195).
FASN, the rate-limiting enzyme in de novo fatty acid synthesis, serves as a core target for intervention. TVB-2640, a first-in-class oral FASN inhibitor, has completed phase I clinical trials in patients with advanced solid tumors and demonstrated favorable safety and tolerability. Preliminary clinical data show that the combination of TVB-2640 with paclitaxel exhibits promising antitumor activity in patients with recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (196,197). A phase II clinical trial evaluating its efficacy in combination with bevacizumab for recurrent HGSOC is currently underway, and the results are expected to provide more robust clinical evidence for its application in gynecological malignancies (198). Orlistat, a traditional anti-obesity drug, has been repurposed due to its FASN inhibitory activity. Orlistat exhibits distinct antitumor effects against ovarian and cervical cancer, downregulating FASN expression in cisplatin-resistant cells to impair metabolic adaptation; combination with cisplatin markedly delays tumor progression (199,200).
SCD1 inhibitors exhibit unique advantages in ovarian cancer treatment. Specific inhibitors, such as A939572 and E6446, block SCD1-mediated monounsaturated fatty acid synthesis, promoting polyunsaturated fatty acid accumulation and triggering lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis. These agents significantly suppress tumor growth in ovarian cancer xenograft models, with notable efficacy particularly against ferroptosis-resistant subtypes (201). HMGCR inhibitors (statins), commonly used as lipid-lowering drugs in clinical practice, have been extensively validated for their antitumor potential: Simvastatin inhibits ovarian cancer cell proliferation and invasion, and enhances chemosensitivity when combined with cisplatin (202). Multiple large-scale epidemiological studies have consistently shown that long-term statin use is associated with reduced incidence of ovarian cancer and improved overall survival in patients with endometrial cancer. Real-world clinical evidence also indicates that statin use combined with platinum-based chemotherapy can prolong progression-free survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer, particularly in those with high LDLR expression, supporting the potential repurposing value of statins in gynecological cancer treatment (203,204).
Inhibitors targeting FAO are also under active development. Etomoxir, a CPT1 inhibitor, blocks the entry of long-chain fatty acids into the mitochondria, reducing FAO-mediated energy supply and enhancing the sensitivity of gynecological cancer cells to chemotherapy (205). ACAT inhibitors (such as avasimibe and K604) suppress cholesterol esterification and lipid droplet accumulation, exerting antitumor effects by disrupting cholesterol homeostasis in preclinical ovarian cancer models. Additionally, liver X receptor (LXR) agonists (such as GW3965) promote cholesterol efflux and regulate lipid metabolic balance. When combined with anti-VEGF agents, they exert a synergistic effect via ‘metabolic regulation-vascular inhibition’ enhancing therapeutic outcomes in ovarian cancer (206,207).
Drugs targeting lipid metabolism regulatory pathways can indirectly rewire the lipid metabolic networks of tumor cells, thereby achieving antitumor effects. These agents typically modulate core transcription factors or signaling axes to concurrently affect multiple lipid metabolic pathways, featuring a broad range of action and potent synergistic effects.
SREBP pathway inhibitors are core representatives: Fatostatin blocks the activation and nuclear translocation of SREBP, concomitantly suppressing both fatty acid and cholesterol synthesis (208,209). In endometrial cancer, it markedly downregulates the expression of downstream target genes such as FASN and ACC, reduces intracellular lipid accumulation and inhibits tumor growth (210).
PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway inhibitors indirectly interfere with lipid metabolism by regulating the activation status of SREBP1. As a VEGF inhibitor, bevacizumab enhances the antitumor efficacy of lipid metabolism inhibitors by indirectly suppressing PI3K/Akt pathway activity. Everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, directly inhibits lipid synthesis in ovarian cancer cells and exerts a synergistic antitumor effect when combined with FASN inhibitors (211,212).
Hippo-YAP/TAZ pathway inhibitors exert their functions by regulating lipid metabolic networks: Verteporfin, a YAP inhibitor, downregulates SREBP1 expression, inhibits fatty acid synthesis and lipid droplet accumulation in ovarian cancer cells, and concomitantly impairs the chemoresistance of tumor cells (213,214). Inhibitors of Nrf2, such as ML385, disrupt cellular redox homeostasis by suppressing the Nrf2/Keap1 pathway, increasing lipid peroxidation levels and promoting ferroptosis. When combined with SCD1 inhibitors, they markedly enhance the therapeutic efficacy against ovarian cancer through the combined effect of metabolic inhibition and oxidative stress (215,216).
Single-agent targeted therapy against lipid metabolism often yields limited effects, making multi-modal combination therapy an emerging core direction to break treatment bottlenecks and reverse drug resistance (217). By combining lipid metabolism inhibitors with chemotherapy, targeted therapy or immunotherapy, synergistic efficacy can be achieved through mechanism complementarity, while simultaneously covering tumor cell populations with diverse metabolic phenotypes (218,219).
The combination of lipid metabolism inhibitors and chemotherapy effectively reverses metabolism-adaptive resistance. For instance, the combination of SCD1 inhibitors and cisplatin enhances cisplatin-induced DNA damage by inducing ferroptosis, reversing platinum resistance in ovarian cancer (220). Statins combined with paclitaxel strengthen the cytotoxicity of chemoradiotherapy in cervical cancer by inhibiting cholesterol synthesis, thereby improving treatment sensitivity. Mechanistically, such combinations regulate lipid metabolic balance, promote the accumulation of drug-induced DNA damage and activate apoptotic signaling, breaking the metabolic adaptive advantage of tumor cells (221,222).
The combination of lipid metabolism inhibitors and immunotherapy represents a highly promising approach. FASN inhibitors downregulate the expression level of PD-L1 on tumor cell surfaces, reducing immune checkpoint-mediated immune evasion; when combined with PD-1 inhibitors, they enhance the cytotoxic activity of CD8+ T cells and markedly improve therapeutic outcomes in ovarian cancer (223,224). CD36 inhibitors combined with PD-L1 inhibitors reduce lipid accumulation and exhaustion in T cells, remodel the cervical cancer immune microenvironment and exhibit synergistic antitumor activity (225). Additionally, LXR agonists improve the polarization phenotype of TAMs by promoting cholesterol efflux, thereby boosting the antitumor effects of immunotherapy (226,227).
The combination of lipid metabolism inhibitors and PARP inhibitors targets the ‘metabolic reprogramming-DNA damage repair’ pathway. The combination of TVB-2640 and PARP inhibitors enhances the synthetic lethal effect induced by PARP inhibitors by suppressing fatty acid synthesis, markedly improving the therapeutic response rate in HGSOC (228,229). A preclinical study demonstrated that this combination effectively inhibits the proliferation of drug-resistant cells and extends the survival time of tumor-bearing mice, providing a novel therapeutic option for tumors with abnormal DNA damage repair pathways (230).
Lipid metabolism-targeted intervention strategies have achieved phased progress in clinical translation, with multiple agents advancing to clinical trials at various stages, and a biomarker-guided precision treatment model taking shape.
The clinical translation of the FASN inhibitor TVB-2640 has been notable: Phase I clinical trials have confirmed its favorable safety and tolerability in patients with advanced solid tumors, with partial disease remission observed in some cases (231–233). A phase II trial is evaluating its efficacy in combination with bevacizumab for recurrent high-grade astrocytoma, providing valuable reference data for analogous combination therapies in gynecological malignancies (234,235). Statins demonstrate distinct advantages in clinical translation: Numerous epidemiological studies have linked statin use to a reduced incidence risk of ovarian and endometrial cancer (236). A phase II clinical trial is assessing the efficacy of atorvastatin combined with progestogens in early-stage endometrial cancer, and preliminary findings indicate that this combination regimen markedly reduces tumor Ki-67 proliferation index (237). A separate phase II trial investigating rosuvastatin + progestogens for early-stage endometrial cancer is also underway to validate the feasibility and safety of this regimen as fertility-sparing therapy, with preclinical mechanistic evidence supporting the biological rationale for this combination strategy (238).
Overall, biomarker-guided precision targeted therapy has emerged as the core direction for future development. Lipid metabolism-related molecules, including FASN, fatty acid transporter CD36 and LDLR, have been validated as prognostic biomarkers and predictors of treatment response. Studies have found that patients with ovarian cancer with high FASN expression are more sensitive to TVB-2640 treatment, while patients with cervical cancer with elevated CD36 expression are more likely to benefit from the combination of CD36 inhibitors and immunotherapy. Future clinical research should further expand sample sizes to validate the clinical predictive value of these biomarkers, establish a precision treatment decision-making system based on lipid metabolic profiles, and realize individualized therapy centered on metabolic subtyping and targeted intervention. Several lipid metabolism-related biomarkers have been validated in clinical settings for prognostic prediction and treatment response stratification. For example, high FASN expression in tumor tissues is an independent poor prognostic factor for ovarian cancer and predicts better response to TVB-2640 treatment. Serum LDL cholesterol levels have been shown to correlate with platinum resistance in patients with ovarian cancer. Additionally, CD36 expression in tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells predicts the efficacy of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in patients with cervical cancer, providing a potential biomarker for patient selection and individualized treatment decision-making.
Compared with previously published reviews focusing on a single tumor type or general lipid metabolic phenotypes, the present review provides a subtype-centric systematic overview across three major gynecological malignancies. The review integrates a full regulatory axis from upstream oncogenic signaling to downstream malignant phenotypes, incorporates emerging mechanisms of ferroptosis regulation and immune microenvironment remodeling, and further summarizes the clinical translation progress of subtype-matched targeted interventions. This aims to offer a more refined theoretical framework for precision metabolic intervention in gynecological malignancies. While this review systematically summarizes the subtype-specific lipid metabolic reprogramming mechanisms and emerging targeted intervention strategies in gynecological malignancies, several critical evidence gaps remain that limit the clinical feasibility of current research plans. Most mechanistic insights are derived from preclinical cell line and animal models, which cannot fully recapitulate the complexity of the human tumor microenvironment and interpatient metabolic heterogeneity. Large-scale, subtype-enriched clinical trials are still lacking to validate the efficacy and safety of lipid metabolism-targeted therapies, and there is no standardized biomarker system to guide patient selection and dynamic efficacy monitoring.
Building on these limitations, despite the groundbreaking advancements in lipid metabolism-targeted research, its clinical translation and widespread application in gynecological malignancies face multiple interconnected challenges that require systematic investigations to address (239). First, the network complexity of lipid metabolism and tumor subtype specificity represent the core constraint for targeted therapy. Notable heterogeneity in lipid metabolic profiles exists across distinct gynecological cancer subtypes and even among patients within the same subtype (240). For instance, the serous subtype of ovarian cancer is characterized by enhanced FAO, while the clear cell subtype relies on lipid storage and exogenous uptake (241). A single therapeutic regimen struggles to cover all metabolic phenotypes, hampering the implementation of precision intervention. Second, the insufficient target specificity of lipid metabolism inhibitors poses a critical issue. Lipid metabolism is a fundamental physiological process in normal cells, and existing inhibitors cannot fully distinguish the metabolic differences between tumor and normal cells. This tends to disrupt lipid homeostasis in normal tissues (such as liver and adipose tissues), leading to off-target effects and adverse reactions. For example, statins may induce muscle injury, while FASN inhibitors can cause weight loss and metabolic disorders (242). Additionally, extensive crosstalk between metabolic pathways increases the risk of therapeutic resistance (243). Lipid metabolism is intricately regulated through cross-talk with glucose metabolism, amino acid metabolism and oncogenic signaling pathways. Targeting lipid metabolism alone is prone to inducing tumor cells to switch their metabolic dependency via reprogramming (for example, shifting from lipogenesis to glycolysis), resulting in adaptive therapeutic resistance and compromised long-term efficacy (244,245).
Future research should focus on the following core directions to optimize and advance lipid metabolism-targeted strategies: i) Systematically decipher the subtype-specific regulatory networks of lipid metabolism in gynecological malignancies. Integrate multi-omics technologies (for example, transcriptomics, lipidomics and metabolomics) with single-cell sequencing to identify subtype-specific and patient-specific metabolic targets, providing a molecular classification basis for precision therapy. ii) Develop highly selective lipid metabolism inhibitors and leverage novel drug delivery systems (such as liposomes and polymeric nanoparticles) to achieve tumor-specific drug accumulation. This approach can minimize damage to normal tissues while improving drug bioavailability and tumor penetration. iii) Elucidate the cross-talk mechanisms between lipid metabolism and oncogenic pathways such as PI3K/Akt/mTOR and Hippo-YAP. Develop multi-targeted combination therapy regimens that exert dual effects of ‘metabolic inhibition + signal blocking’ to overcome therapeutic resistance caused by single-target interventions. iv) Identify and validate lipid metabolism-related biomarkers (for example, FASN, CD36 and LDLR) through multi-center, large-cohort studies. Establish individualized treatment prediction models incorporating metabolic features and clinicopathological parameters to guide treatment selection and dynamic efficacy assessment. v) Conduct subtype-enriched clinical trials targeting specific populations (such as HGSOC and obesity-associated endometrial cancer). Validate the efficacy, safety and dosage optimization of lipid metabolism-targeted therapies to expedite their clinical translation.
With the in-depth elucidation of lipid metabolism regulatory mechanisms in gynecological malignancies, lipid metabolism-targeted strategies are expected to become an integral component of precision therapy for these diseases. They may provide a novel breakthrough for improving the prognosis of advanced and drug-resistant patients, ultimately achieving the closed-loop of metabolic subtyping-precision intervention-efficacy prediction in individualized therapy.
Not applicable.
Funding: No funding was received.
Not applicable.
YR conceived the study, conducted the systematic literature retrieval and screening, extracted the relevant research data, drafted the full manuscript and critically revised it. Data authentication is not applicable. The author has read and approved the final manuscript.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The author declares that they have no competing interests.
|
Zhao X, Ran J, Li S and Chen J: Advances and obstacles of T cell-based immunotherapy in gynecological malignancies. Mol Cancer. 24:2072025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Fotopoulou C, Eriksson AG, Baiocchi G and Zivanovic O: Surgery for gynecological cancers in the era of personalized medicine: A novel paradigm. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 34:3512024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Movahed F, Ourang Z, Neshat R, Hussein WS, Saihood AS, Alarajy MS and Zareii D: PROTACs in gynecological cancers: Current knowledge and future potential as a treatment strategy. Pathol Res Pract. 263:1556112024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Morice P, Scambia G, Abu-Rustum NR, Acien M, Arena A, Brucker S, Cheong Y, Collinet P, Fanfani F, Filippi F, et al: Fertility-sparing treatment and follow-up in patients with cervical cancer, ovarian cancer, and borderline ovarian tumours: Guidelines from ESGO, ESHRE, and ESGE. Lancet Oncol. 25:e602–e610. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Gupta R, Kumar R, Penn CA and Wajapeyee N: Immune evasion in ovarian cancer: Implications for immunotherapy and emerging treatments. Trends Immunol. 46:166–181. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Xie W, Tang S, Tang R, Li L and Liu X: Global, regional, and national burden of ovarian cancer, 1990–2021, and projections to 2050: A cross-sectional analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Int J Surg. 112:226–238. 2026. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhu B, Gu H, Mao Z, Beeraka NM, Zhao X, Anand MP, Zheng Y, Zhao R, Li S, Manogaran P, et al: Global burden of gynaecological cancers in 2022 and projections to 2050. J Glob Health. 14:041552024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Huang P, Fan X, Yu H, Zhang K, Li H, Wang Y and Xue F: Glucose metabolic reprogramming and its therapeutic potential in obesity-associated endometrial cancer. J Transl Med. 21:942023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Crosbie EJ, Kitson SJ, McAlpine JN, Mukhopadhyay A, Powell ME and Singh N: Endometrial cancer. Lancet. 399:1412–1428. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Huang R, Liu Z, Sun T and Zhu L: Cervicovaginal microbiome, high-risk HPV infection and cervical cancer: Mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Microbiol Res. 287:1278572024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Branda F, Pavia G, Ciccozzi A, Quirino A, Marascio N, Gigliotti S, Matera G, Romano C, Locci C, Azzena I, et al: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination: Progress, challenges, and future directions in global immunization strategies. Vaccines (Basel). 12:12932023. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Xu M, Cao C, Wu P, Huang X and Ma D: Advances in cervical cancer: Current insights and future directions. Cancer Commun (Lond). 45:77–109. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Mayadev JS, Ke G, Mahantshetty U, Pereira MD, Tarnawski R and Toita T: Global challenges of radiotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 32:436–445. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Small W Jr, Bacon MA, Bajaj A, Chuang LT, Fisher BJ, Harkenrider MM, Jhingran A, Kitchener HC, Mileshkin LR, Viswanathan AN and Gaffney DK: Cervical cancer: A global health crisis. Cancer. 123:2404–2412. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ma Y, Temkin SM, Hawkridge AM, Guo C, Wang W, Wang X and Fang X: Fatty acid oxidation: An emerging facet of metabolic transformation in cancer. Cancer Lett. 435:92–100. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Li J, Yang H, Zhang L, Zhang S and Dai Y: Metabolic reprogramming and interventions in endometrial carcinoma. Biomed Pharmacother. 161:1145262023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Li B and Sui L: Metabolic reprogramming in cervical cancer and metabolomics perspectives. Nutr Metab (Lond). 18:932021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Žalytė E: Ferroptosis, metabolic rewiring, and endometrial cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 25:752023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhang J, Ouyang F, Gao A, Zeng T, Li M, Li H, Zhou W, Gao Q, Tang X, Zhang Q, et al: ESM1 enhances fatty acid synthesis and vascular mimicry in ovarian cancer by utilizing the PKM2-dependent warburg effect within the hypoxic tumor microenvironment. Mol Cancer. 23:942024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Hwang S, Awasthi D, Jeong J, Sandoval TA, Chae C, Ramos Y, Tan C, Marin Falco M, Salvagno C, Emmanuelli A, et al: Transgelin 2 guards T cell lipid metabolism and antitumour function. Nature. 635:1010–1018. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhang C, Wang Y, He M, Wang C, Cao K, Zhong Y, Wang X, Yang M, Zhang G, Lu J, et al: Mannose Enhances Immunotherapy Efficacy in Ovarian Cancer by Modulating Gut Microbial Metabolites. Cancer Res. 85:2468–2484. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Dyck L, Prendeville H, Raverdeau M, Wilk MM, Loftus RM, Douglas A, McCormack J, Moran B, Wilkinson M, Mills EL, et al: Suppressive effects of the obese tumor microenvironment on CD8 T cell infiltration and effector function. J Exp Med. 219:e202100422022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Guo C, Qu X, Tang X, Song Y, Wang J, Hua K and Qiu J: Spatiotemporally deciphering the mysterious mechanism of persistent HPV-induced malignant transition and immune remodelling from HPV-infected normal cervix, precancer to cervical cancer: Integrating single-cell RNA-sequencing and spatial transcriptome. Clin Transl Med. 13:e12192023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Shafiee MN, Mongan N, Seedhouse C, Chapman C, Deen S, Abu J and Atiomo W: Sterol regulatory element binding protein-1 (SREBP1) gene expression is similarly increased in polycystic ovary syndrome and endometrial cancer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 96:556–562. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yano H, Fujiwara Y and Komohara Y: Cholesterol metabolism and lipid droplet vacuoles; a potential target for the therapy of aggressive lymphoma. J Clin Exp Hematop. 62:190–194. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang Y, Han S, You X, Shi X, Liu L, Sun Y, Ma Y, Qian Q, Liu H, Cui B and Zhang Y: The role of low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 11 as a tumor promoter in cervical cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 11:8081–8093. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Liu S, Zhang X, Wang W, Li X, Sun X, Zhao Y, Wang Q, Li Y, Hu F and Ren H: Metabolic reprogramming and therapeutic resistance in primary and metastatic breast cancer. Mol Cancer. 23:2612024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Russo S, Kwiatkowski M, Govorukhina N, Bischoff R and Melgert BN: Meta-Inflammation and metabolic reprogramming of macrophages in diabetes and obesity: The importance of metabolites. Front Immunol. 12:7461512021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang L, Zhu H, Shi Z, Chen B, Huang H, Lin G, Li J, Yu H, Xu S, Chen G, et al: MK8722 initiates early-stage autophagy while inhibiting late-stage autophagy via FASN-dependent reprogramming of lipid metabolism. Theranostics. 14:75–95. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Fu Y, Francés R, Monge C, Desterke C, Marchio A, Pineau P, Chang-Marchand Y and Mata-Garrido J: Metabolic and epigenetic mechanisms in hepatoblastoma: Insights into tumor biology and therapeutic targets. Genes (Basel). 15:13582024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Tufail M, Jiang CH and Li N: Altered metabolism in cancer: Insights into energy pathways and therapeutic targets. Mol Cancer. 23:2032024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yi J, Zhu J, Wu J, Thompson CB and Jiang X: Oncogenic activation of PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling suppresses ferroptosis via SREBP-mediated lipogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 117:31189–31197. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Luo M, Yan J, Hu X, Li H, Li H, Liu Q, Chen Y and Zou Z: Targeting lipid metabolism for ferroptotic cancer therapy. Apoptosis. 28:81–107. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Xu J, Peng JJ, Yang W, Fu K and Zhang Y: Vaginal microbiomes and ovarian cancer: A review. Am J Cancer Res. 10:743–756. 2020.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Caruso G, Weroha SJ and Cliby W: Ovarian cancer: A review. JAMA. 334:1278–1291. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Huang Y, Du Y, Zheng Y, Wen C, Zou H, Huang J, Zhou H, Zhao H and Wu L: Ct-OATP1B3 promotes high-grade serous ovarian cancer metastasis by regulation of fatty acid beta-oxidation and oxidative phosphorylation. Cell Death Dis. 13:5562022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Huang D, Chowdhury S, Wang H, Savage SR, Ivey RG, Kennedy JJ, Whiteaker JR, Lin C, Hou X, Oberg AL, et al: Multiomic analysis identifies CPT1A as a potential therapeutic target in platinum-refractory, high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Cell Rep Med. 2:1004712021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sawyer BT, Qamar L, Yamamoto TM, McMellen A, Watson ZL, Richer JK, Behbakht K, Schlaepfer IR and Bitler BG: Targeting fatty acid oxidation to promote anoikis and inhibit ovarian cancer progression. Mol Cancer Res. 18:1088–1098. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kolb S, Hoffmann I, Monjé N, Dragomir MP, Jank P, Bischoff P, Keunecke C, Pohl J, Kunze CA, Marchenko S, et al: LRP1B-a prognostic marker in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma. Hum Pathol. 141:158–168. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
van Baal JOAM, Lok CAR, Jordanova ES, Horlings H, van Driel WJ, Amant FC and Van de Vijver KK: The effect of the peritoneal tumor microenvironment on invasion of peritoneal metastases of high-grade serous ovarian cancer and the impact of NEOADJUVANT chemotherapy. Virchows Arch. 477:535–544. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Koizume S, Takahashi T and Miyagi Y: Lipid droplets: A candidate new research field for epithelial ovarian cancer. Front Pharmacol. 15:14371612024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Luo H, She X, Zhang Y, Xie B, Zhang S, Li Q, Zhou Y, Guo S, Zhang S, Jiang Y, et al: PLIN2 promotes lipid accumulation in ascites-associated macrophages and ovarian cancer progression by HIF1α/SPP1 signaling. Adv Sci (Weinh). 12:e24113142025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zheng C, Tan H, Niu G, Huang X, Lu J, Chen S, Li H, Zhu J, Zhou Z, Xu M, et al: ACAT1-Mediated ME2 acetylation drives chemoresistance in ovarian cancer by linking glutaminolysis to lactate production. Adv Sci (Weinh). 12:e24164672025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ahmad N, Moton S, Kuttikrishnan S, Prabhu KS, Masoodi T, Ahmad S and Uddin S: Fatty acid synthase: A key driver of ovarian cancer metastasis and a promising therapeutic target. Pathol Res Pract. 260:1554652024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lombardi S, Goldman AR, Tang HY, Kossenkov AV, Liu H, Zhou W, Herlyn M, Lin J and Zhang R: Targeting fatty acid reprogramming suppresses CARM1-expressing ovarian cancer. Cancer Res Commun. 3:1067–1077. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Jiang L, Fang X, Wang H, Li D and Wang X: Ovarian cancer-intrinsic fatty acid synthase prevents anti-tumor immunity by disrupting tumor-infiltrating dendritic cells. Front Immunol. 9:29272018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sung S, Hong Y, Kim BG, Choi JY, Kim JW, Park SY, Kim JM, Kim YJ, Lee JM, Kim TJ, et al: Stratifying the risk of ovarian cancer incidence by histologic subtypes in the Korean epithelial ovarian cancer study (Ko-EVE). Cancer Med. 12:8742–8753. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wu R, Li N, Huang W, Yang Y, Zang R, Song H, Shi J, Zhu S and Liu Q: Melittin suppresses ovarian cancer growth by regulating SREBP1-mediated lipid metabolism. Phytomedicine. 137:1563672025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ji Z, Shen Y, Feng X, Kong Y, Shao Y, Meng J, Zhang X and Yang G: Deregulation of lipid metabolism: The critical factors in ovarian cancer. Front Oncol. 10:5930172020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Mukherjee A, Wu J, Barbour S and Fang X: Lysophosphatidic acid activates lipogenic pathways and de novo lipid synthesis in ovarian cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 287:24990–25000. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Tian W, Teng F, Zhao J, Gao J, Gao C, Sun D, Liu G, Zhang Y, Yu S, Zhang W, et al: Estrogen and insulin synergistically promote type 1 endometrial cancer progression. Cancer Biol Ther. 18:1000–1010. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kim DS and Scherer PE: Obesity, diabetes, and increased cancer progression. Diabetes Metab J. 45:799–812. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Qiu C, Dongol S, Lv QT, Gao X and Jiang J: Sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1/fatty acid synthase involvement in proliferation inhibition and apoptosis promotion induced by progesterone in endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 23:1629–1634. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Dang C, Wang X, Liu P, Liu J and Yu X: Genetically proxied therapeutic effect of lipid-lowering drugs use, breast cancer, and endometrial cancer's risk: A drug target-based mendelian Randomization study. Int J Womens Health. 16:2033–2041. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Galant N, Krawczyk P, Monist M, Obara A, Gajek U, Grenda A, Nico M, Kalinka E and Milanowski J: Molecular classification of endometrial cancer and its impact on therapy selection. Int J Mol Sci. 25:58932024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Garikapati KK, Ammu VVVR, Krishnamurthy PT, Chintamaneni PK and Pindiprolu SKSS: Type-II endometrial cancer: Role of adipokines. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 300:239–249. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wysham WZ, Roque DR, Han J, Zhang L, Guo H, Gehrig PA, Zhou C and Bae-Jump VL: Effects of Fatty acid synthase inhibition by orlistat on proliferation of endometrial cancer cell lines. Target Oncol. 11:763–769. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Garg P, Ramisetty S, Nair M, Kulkarni P, Horne D, Salgia R and Singhal SS: Strategic advancements in targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway for Breast cancer therapy. Biochem Pharmacol. 236:1168502025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Hao C, Wei Y, Meng W, Zhang J and Yang X: PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors for hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 132:1028612025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Roncolato F, Lindemann K, Willson ML, Martyn J and Mileshkin L: PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 10:CD0121602019.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kyrgiou M and Moscicki AB: Vaginal microbiome and cervical cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 86((Pt 3)): 189–198. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Bhatla N and Singhal S: Primary HPV screening for cervical cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 65:98–108. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Pal A and Kundu R: Human Papillomavirus E6 and E7: The cervical cancer hallmarks and targets for therapy. Front Microbiol. 10:31162020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Hu C, Liu T, Han C, Xuan Y, Jiang D, Sun Y, Zhang X, Zhang W, Xu Y, Liu Y, et al: HPV E6/E7 promotes aerobic glycolysis in cervical cancer by regulating IGF2BP2 to stabilize m(6)A-MYC expression. Int J Biol Sci. 18:507–521. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang S, Dang L, Liu S, Rezhake R, Yan H, Duan X, Zhang L, Zhang L, Zhang L, Su M, et al: Cervical cancer screening via visual inspection with acetic acid and lugol iodine for triage of HPV-Positive women. JAMA Netw Open. 7:e2440902024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Al-Qurayshi Z, Foggia MJ, Pagedar N, Lee GS, Tufano R and Kandil E: Thyroid cancer histological subtypes based on tumor size: National perspective. Head Neck. 42:2257–2266. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang M, Huang K, Wong MCS, Huang J, Jin Y and Zheng ZJ: Global cervical cancer incidence by histological subtype and implications for screening methods. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 14:94–101. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Liu C, Zhang M, Yan X, Ni Y, Gong Y, Wang C, Zhang X, Wan L, Yang H, Ge C, et al: Single-cell dissection of cellular and molecular features underlying human cervical squamous cell carcinoma initiation and progression. Sci Adv. 9:eadd89772023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Cibula D, Dostálek L, Jarkovsky J, Mom CH, Lopez A, Falconer H, Scambia G, Ayhan A, Kim SH, Isla Ortiz D, et al: Post-recurrence survival in patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 164:362–369. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ilhan ZE, Aniewski P, Thomas N, Roe DJ, Chase DM and Herbst-Kralovetz MM: Deciphering the complex interplay between microbiota, HPV, inflammation and cancer through cervicovaginal metabolic profiling. EBioMedicine. 44:675–690. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Williamson A: Recent developments in human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccinology. Viruses. 15:14402023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Baba SK, Alblooshi SSE, Yaqoob R, Behl S, Al Saleem M, Rakha EA, Malik F, Singh M, Macha MA, Akhtar MK, et al: Human papilloma virus (HPV) mediated cancers: An insightful update. J Transl Med. 23:4832025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Du H, Xu T, Yu S, Wu S and Zhang J: Mitochondrial metabolism and cancer therapeutic innovation. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 10:2452025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Gopinath P, Natarajan A, Sathyanarayanan A, Veluswami S and Gopisetty G: The multifaceted role of Matricellular Proteins in health and cancer, as biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Gene. 815:1461372022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Corrêa LH, Heyn GS and Magalhaes KG: The impact of the adipose organ plasticity on inflammation and cancer progression. Cells. 8:6622019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Slattery K, Yao CH, Mylod E, Scanlan J, Scott B, Crowley JP, McGowan O, McManus G, Brennan M, O'Brien K, et al: Uptake of lipids from ascites drives NK cell metabolic dysfunction in ovarian cancer. Sci Immunol. 10:eadr47952025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kouba S, Ouldamer L, Garcia C, Fontaine D, Chantome A, Vandier C, Goupille C and Potier-Cartereau M: Lipid metabolism and Calcium signaling in epithelial ovarian cancer. Cell Calcium. 81:38–50. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Jin N, Qian YY, Jiao XF, Wang Z, Li X, Pan W, Jiang JK, Huang P, Wang SY, Jin P, et al: Niraparib restricts intraperitoneal metastases of ovarian cancer by eliciting CD36-dependent ferroptosis. Redox Biol. 80:1035282025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ladanyi A, Mukherjee A, Kenny HA, Johnson A, Mitra AK, Sundaresan S, Nieman KM, Pascual G, Benitah SA, Montag A, et al: Adipocyte-induced CD36 expression drives ovarian cancer progression and metastasis. Oncogene. 37:2285–2301. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Huang Z, Zhang X, Huang J, Liu X, Liang M, Yang F, Gao T, Huang J, Xia G, Cao J, et al: Elevated CD36 drives lymph node metastasis of breast cancer by activating Hippo-YAP signaling-mediated anoikis resistance. Commun Biol. 9:802025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Tang S, Chen K, Zheng F, Fu Z, Niu Y, Liu X, Ni H, Yuan X, Cui Z, Lu W, et al: High serum LDL promotes EMT and stemness through LDLR/FOXQ1/NF-κB1 pathway in epithelial ovarian cancer. Oncogene. 44:4587–4600. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang M, Zhao D, Xu L, Guo W, Nie L, Lei Y, Long Y, Liu M, Wang Y, Zhang X, et al: Role of PCSK9 in lipid metabolic disorders and ovarian dysfunction in polycystic ovary syndrome. Metabolism. 94:47–58. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Criscuolo D, Avolio R, Calice G, Laezza C, Paladino S, Navarra G, Maddalena F, Crispo F, Pagano C, Bifulco M, et al: Cholesterol homeostasis modulates platinum sensitivity in human ovarian cancer. Cells. 9:8282020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Knapp P, Chabowski A, Posmyk R and Górski J: Expression of the energy substrate transporters in uterine fibroids. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 123:9–15. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Grunt TW, Lemberger L, Colomer R, López Rodríguez ML and Wagner R: The pharmacological or genetic blockade of endogenous de novo fatty acid synthesis does not increase the uptake of exogenous lipids in ovarian cancer cells. Front Oncol. 11:6108852021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lemberger L, Wagner R, Heller G, Pils D and Grunt TW: Pharmacological inhibition of lipid import and transport proteins in ovarian cancer. Cancers (Basel). 14:60042022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang Q, Hu R, Li W, Tai Y, Gu W, Das BC, Yang F, Ji J, Wang C and Zhou J: BF175 inhibits endometrial carcinoma through SREBP-regulated metabolic pathways in vitro. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 523:1111352021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Abdul-Maksoud RS, Zidan HE, Saleh HS and Amer SA: Visfatin and SREBP-1c mRNA expressions and serum levels among egyptian women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 24:409–419. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Du Q, Liu P, Zhang C, Liu T, Wang W, Shang C, Wu J, Liao Y, Chen Y, Huang J, et al: FASN promotes lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer via cholesterol reprogramming and lymphangiogenesis. Cell Death Dis. 13:4882022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Gao S, Shi Z, Li X, Li W, Wang Y, Liu Z and Jiang J: Fatostatin suppresses growth and enhances apoptosis by blocking SREBP-regulated metabolic pathways in endometrial carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 39:1919–1929. 2018.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang X, Du Q, Mai Q, Zou Q, Wang S, Lin X, Chen Q, Wei M, Chi C, Peng Z, et al: Targeting FASN enhances cisplatin sensitivity via SLC7A11-mediated ferroptosis in cervical cancer. Transl Oncol. 56:1023962025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Liu Y, Liu X, Wang H, Ding P and Wang C: Agrimonolide inhibits cancer progression and induces ferroptosis and apoptosis by targeting SCD1 in ovarian cancer cells. Phytomedicine. 101:1541022022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Katoh Y, Yaguchi T, Kubo A, Iwata T, Morii K, Kato D, Ohta S, Satomi R, Yamamoto Y, Oyamada Y, et al: Inhibition of stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD1) enhances the antitumor T cell response through regulating β-catenin signaling in cancer cells and ER stress in T cells and synergizes with anti-PD-1 antibody. J Immunother Cancer. 10:e0046162022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ikeda T, Katoh Y, Hino H, Seta D, Ogawa T, Iwata T, Nishio H, Sugawara M and Hirai S: FADS2 confers SCD1 inhibition resistance to cancer cells by modulating the ER stress response. Sci Rep. 14:131162024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Su T, Li G, Guan Y, Tian Q, Qi Y, Zhang Y, Wei W, Duan X, Rui J, Zhu H, et al: PROTAC?Mediated HMGCR depletion reprograms lipid metabolism in breast cancer to potentiate photoimmunotherapy via ferroptosis. Adv Sci (Weinh). 13:e215252026. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Mei X, Xiong J, Liu J, Huang A, Zhu D, Huang Y and Wang H: DHCR7 promotes lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer through cholesterol reprogramming-mediated activation of the KANK4/PI3K/AKT axis and VEGF-C secretion. Cancer Lett. 584:2166092024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhang L, Zhao J, Su C, Wu J, Jiang L, Chi H and Wang Q: Organoid models of ovarian cancer: Resolving immune mechanisms of metabolic reprogramming and drug resistance. Front Immunol. 16:15736862025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Valdivia A, Isac AM, Cardenas H, Zhao G, Zhang Y, Huang H, Wei JJ, Cuello-Fredes M, Kato S, Gómez-Valenzuela F, et al: Complement activation at the interface between adipocytes and cancer cells drives tumor progression. JCI Insight. 10:e1849352025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang W, Li X, Gao Y, Zheng H and Gao M: A nomogram prediction model for the TP53mut subtype in endometrial cancer based on preoperative noninvasive parameters. BMC Cancer. 23:7202023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Shang C, Qiao J and Guo H: The dynamic behavior of lipid droplets in the pre-metastatic niche. Cell Death Dis. 11:9902020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Pan Y, Chen L, Shen J, Hong S, Guan X, Ma X, Tang R, Lu M, Sun F, Shang S, et al: GANT61 modulates autophagy and lipid metabolism in ovarian cancer. Cell Prolif. 58:e700512025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Cadenas C, Vosbeck S, Edlund K, Grgas K, Madjar K, Hellwig B, Adawy A, Glotzbach A, Stewart JD, Lesjak MS, et al: LIPG-promoted lipid storage mediates adaptation to oxidative stress in breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 145:901–915. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Deswal B, Nallanthighal S, Nikpayam E, Minhas Z, Paul A, Goo YH and Cheon DJ: Lipid droplet-associated hydrolase (LDAH) knockdown enhances TAG hydrolysis and promotes ovarian cancer progression and chemoresistance. Oncogenesis. 14:222025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ayyagari VN, Wang X, Diaz-Sylvester PL, Groesch K and Brard L: Assessment of acyl-CoA cholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT-1) role in ovarian cancer progression-An in vitro study. PLoS One. 15:e02280242020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Shi H, Pang B, Zhang F, Guo Z, Xu W, Zheng M, You Y, Liu G, Nie Y, Liang J and Chang X: A novel ligustrazine-based nanodelivery system protects against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity by targeting the SIRT5-DUSP1 axis for mitochondrial repair. J Nanobiotechnology. 23:6812025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Pang B, Dong G, Pang T, Sun X, Liu X, Nie Y and Chang X: Emerging insights into the pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies for vascular endothelial injury-associated diseases: focus on mitochondrial dysfunction. Angiogenesis. 27:623–639. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Rizzo A, Satta A, Garrone G, Cavalleri A, Napoli A, Raspagliesi F, Figini M, De Cecco L, Iorio E, Tomassetti A, et al: Choline kinase alpha impairment overcomes TRAIL resistance in ovarian cancer cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 40:52021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Li Z, Tan Y, Li X, Quan J, Bode AM, Cao Y and Luo X: DHRS2 inhibits cell growth and metastasis in ovarian cancer by downregulation of CHKα to disrupt choline metabolism. Cell Death Dis. 13:8452022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yuan L, Jiang H, Jia Y, Liao Y, Shao C, Zhou Y, Li J, Liao Y, Huang H, Pan Y, et al: Fatty acid oxidation supports lymph node metastasis of cervical cancer via Acetyl-CoA-Mediated stemness. Adv Sci (Weinh). 11:e23084222024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Huang M, Wang S, Huang H, Li L and Wang T: CAR-NK cell for gynecological cancers: Immune microenvironment remodeling and immunotherapeutic strategies. Front Immunol. 16:17053542025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Park JH, Vithayathil S, Kumar S, Sung PL, Dobrolecki LE, Putluri V, Bhat VB, Bhowmik SK, Gupta V, Arora K, et al: Fatty acid oxidation-driven src links mitochondrial energy reprogramming and oncogenic properties in triple-negative breast cancer. Cell Rep. 14:2154–2165. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang J, Zhuang H, Li C, Cai R, Shi H, Pang B, Guo Z, Ong S, Nie Y, Du Y, et al: Ligustrazine nano-drug delivery system ameliorates doxorubicin-mediated myocardial injury via piezo-type mechanosensitive ion channel component 1-prohibitin 2-mediated mitochondrial quality surveillance. J Nanobiotechnology. 23:3832025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang J, Zhuang H, Jia L, He X, Zheng S, Ji K, Xie K, Ying T, Zhang Y, Li C and Chang X: Nuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 1 promotes myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury through inducing mitochondrial fission factor-mediated mitochondrial fragmentation and inhibiting FUN14 domain containing 1-depedent mitophagy. Int J Biol Sci. 20:4458–4475. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Duarte Mendes A, Freitas AR, Vicente R, Vitorino M, Vaz Batista M, Silva M and Braga S: Adipocyte microenvironment in ovarian cancer: A critical contributor? Int J Mol Sci. 24:165892023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Almeida-Nunes DL, Mendes-Frias A, Silvestre R, Dinis-Oliveira RJ and Ricardo S: Immune tumor microenvironment in ovarian cancer ascites. Int J Mol Sci. 23:106922022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Takahashi Y, Serada S, Ohkawara T, Fujimoto M, Hiramatsu K, Ueda Y, Kimura T, Takemori H and Naka T: LSR promotes epithelial ovarian cancer cell survival under energy stress through the LKB1-AMPK pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 537:93–99. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yung MMH, Siu MKY, Ngan HYS, Chan DW and Chan KKL: Orchestrated Action of AMPK activation and combined VEGF/PD-1 blockade with lipid metabolic tunning as multi-target therapeutics against ovarian cancers. Int J Mol Sci. 23:68572022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Pakhira S and Roy SS: Altered fatty acid oxidation via CPT1A promotes epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in ovarian cancer. FEBS J. 292:6283–6306. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Awad D, Cao PHA, Pulliam TL, Spradlin M, Subramani E, Tellman TV, Ribeiro CF, Muzzioli R, Jewell BE, Pakula H, et al: Adipose triglyceride lipase is a therapeutic target in advanced prostate cancer that promotes metabolic plasticity. Cancer Res. 84:703–724. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Li L and Ling Z: Mechanisms of cancer cachexia and targeted therapeutic strategies. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 1879:1892082024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Park M, Choe S, Shin M, Kim A, Mo K, Kwon H and Yoon H: Potential therapeutic targets in ovarian cancer: Autophagy and metabolism. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 28:472023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ashraf R and Kumar S: Mfn2-mediated mitochondrial fusion promotes autophagy and suppresses ovarian cancer progression by reducing ROS through AMPK/mTOR/ERK signaling. Cell Mol Life Sci. 79:5732022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yang Y, Rui L, Zhang B, Huang T and Shao G: Autophagy regulation in ovarian cancer chemoresistance: Molecular mechanisms and emerging frontiers. Life Sci. 380:1239662025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Cheaib B, Auguste A and Leary A: The PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway in ovarian cancer: Therapeutic opportunities and challenges. Chin J Cancer. 34:4–16. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Mabuchi S, Kuroda H, Takahashi R and Sasano T: The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway as a therapeutic target in ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 137:173–179. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ediriweera MK, Tennekoon KH and Samarakoon SR: Role of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway in ovarian cancer: Biological and therapeutic significance. Semin Cancer Biol. 59:147–160. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ghoneum A and Said N: PI3K-AKT-mTOR and NFkappaB pathways in ovarian cancer: Implications for targeted therapeutics. Cancers (Basel). 11:9492019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Agrawal M, Agrawal SK and Chopra K: Overcoming drug resistance in ovarian cancer through PI3K/AKT signaling inhibitors. Gene. 948:1493522025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang D, He J, Dong J, Meyer TF and Xu T: The HIPPO pathway in gynecological malignancies. Am J Cancer Res. 10:610–629. 2020.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Shen X, Li Q, Sun Y, Chen L, Xue F, Tian W and Wang Y: The Hippo pathway in endometrial cancer: A potential therapeutic target? Front Oncol. 13:12733452023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Tao YP, Zhu HY, Shi QY, Wang CX, Hua YX, Hu HY, Zhou QY, Zhou ZL, Sun Y, Wang XM, et al: S1PR1 regulates ovarian cancer cell senescence through the PDK1-LATS1/2-YAP pathway. Oncogene. 42:3491–3502. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang M, Yan Q, Song Y, Zhang Z, Chen X, Gao K and Wan X: Loss-of-function mutations of SOX17 lead to YAP/TEAD activation-dependent malignant transformation in endometrial cancer. Oncogene. 42:322–334. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wen X, Wan J, He Q, Wang M, Li S, Jiang M, Qian Z, Liu B, Lu W, Wang K, et al: p190A inactivating mutations cause aberrant RhoA activation and promote malignant transformation via the Hippo-YAP pathway in endometrial cancer. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 5:812020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Tossetta G and Marzioni D: Targeting the NRF2/KEAP1 pathway in cervical and endometrial cancers. Eur J Pharmacol. 941:1755032023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang H, Liu J, Zhang Z, Peng J, Wang Z, Yang L, Wang X, Hu S and Hong L: β-Sitosterol targets ASS1 for Nrf2 ubiquitin-dependent degradation, inducing ROS-mediated apoptosis via the PTEN/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in ovarian cancer. Free Radic Biol Med. 214:137–157. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Tossetta G, Fantone S, Montanari E, Marzioni D and Goteri G: Role of NRF2 in ovarian cancer. Antioxidants (Basel). 11:6632022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhu X, Chen X, Qiu L, Zhu J and Wang J: Norcantharidin induces ferroptosis via the suppression of NRF2/HO-1 signaling in ovarian cancer cells. Oncol Lett. 24:3592022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Cho H, Kim K, Kim Y, Kim H and No JH.: Expression patterns of Nrf2 and Keap1 in ovarian cancer cells and their prognostic role in disease recurrence and patient survival. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 27:412–419. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhan S, Yung MMH, Siu MKY, Jiao P, Ngan HYS, Chan DW and Chan KKL: New insights into ferroptosis initiating therapies (FIT) by targeting the rewired lipid metabolism in ovarian cancer peritoneal metastases. Int J Mol Sci. 23:152632022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Liu C, Liu W, Huang J, Wu Z, Li W, Chen B, Yang Y, Lin H and Xu Y: Metabolic reprogramming shapes the progression and therapeutic landscape of ovarian cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 17:1707–1722. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhou X, Zhang J, Lv W, Zhao C, Xia Y, Wu Y and Zhang Q: The pleiotropic roles of adipocyte secretome in remodeling breast cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 41:2032022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wei S, Zhang J, Zhao R, Shi R, An L, Yu Z, Zhang Q, Zhang J, Yao Y, Li H and Wang H: Histone lactylation promotes malignant progression by facilitating USP39 expression to target PI3K/AKT/HIF-1α signal pathway in endometrial carcinoma. Cell Death Discov. 10:1212024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Xie W, Yu J, Yin Y, Zhang X, Zheng X and Wang X: OCT4 induces EMT and promotes ovarian cancer progression by regulating the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. Front Oncol. 12:8762572022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ji Z, Li X, Gao W, Xia Q and Li J: ALOX5 induces EMT and promotes cell metastasis via the LTB4/BLT2/PI3K/AKT pathway in ovarian cancer. Cell Signal. 124:1114042024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Tomi Nagli D, Mandi AA, Milankov A, Pejakovi SA, Jani IS, Vukovi N, Bajkin I, Ičin T, Manojlovi M and Stoki E: Metabolic dysregulation in obese women and the carcinogenesis of gynecological tumors: A review. Biomol Biomed. 24:787–797. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wei X, Lou H, Zhou D, Jia Y, Li H, Huang Q, Ma J, Yang Z, Sun C, Meng Y, et al: TAGLN mediated stiffness-regulated ovarian cancer progression via RhoA/ROCK pathway. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 40:2922021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhang P, Zhu J, Zheng Y, Zhang H, Sun H and Gao S: miRNA-574-3p inhibits metastasis and chemoresistance of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) by negatively regulating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Am J Transl Res. 11:4151–4165. 2019.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Mishra Y, Chattaraj A, Mishra V, Ranjan A and Tambuwala MM: Aptamers versus vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF): A new battle against ovarian cancer. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 16:8492023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
He Y, OuYang Z, Liu W, Chen Y and Zhang Q: TARDBP promotes ovarian cancer progression by altering vascular endothelial growth factor splicing. Oncogene. 42:49–61. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Shi Y, Zheng H, Wang T, Zhou S, Zhao S, Li M and Cao B: Targeting KRAS: From metabolic regulation to cancer treatment. Mol Cancer. 24:92025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Bäumer N, Tiemann J, Scheller A, Meyer T, Wittmann L, Suburu MEG, Greune L, Peipp M, Kellmann N, Gumnior A, et al: Targeted siRNA nanocarrier: A platform technology for cancer treatment. Oncogene. 41:2210–2224. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zheng B, Zhang W, Xie S, Han Y, Liu G, Liu Y, Gao M, Wang S and Liu Q: Selinexor as a therapeutic target: Advances in non-small cell and small cell lung cancer treatment strategies. Recent Pat Anticancer Drug Discov. 20:274–284. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Liu L, Sun Y, An R, Cheng R, Li N and Zheng J: LDLR promotes autophagy-mediated cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer associated with the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 39:779–788. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ma Q, Liu Z, Wang T, Zhao P, Liu M, Wang Y, Zhao W, Yuan Y and Li S: Resensitizing paclitaxel-resistant ovarian cancer via targeting lipid metabolism key enzymes CPT1A, SCD and FASN. Int J Mol Sci. 24:165032023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Liu C, Li J, Xu F, Chen L, Ni M, Wu J, Zhao H, Wu Y, Li J, Wu X and Chen X: PARP1-DOT1L transcription axis drives acquired resistance to PARP inhibitor in ovarian cancer. Mol Cancer. 23:1112024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yang L, Xie HJ, Li YY, Wang X, Liu XX and Mai J: Molecular mechanisms of platinum?based chemotherapy resistance in ovarian cancer (Review). Oncol Rep. 47:822022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
An S, Han A, Lin Z and Quan H: Targeting ferroptosis in cervical cancer: Mechanistic insights and therapeutic opportunities. Cell Signal. 136:1121222025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Muhammad N, Ruiz F, Stanley J, Rashmi R, Cho K, Jayachandran K, Zahner MC, Huang Y, Zhang J, Markovina S, et al: Monounsaturated and diunsaturated fatty acids sensitize cervical cancer to radiation therapy. Cancer Res. 82:4515–4527. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Xu X, Ping P, Zhang Z and Zou L: Plasma free fatty acid levels in cervical cancer: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy improves abnormal profile. Front Pharmacol. 15:13521012024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Shi Z, Zhou Q, Gao S, Li W, Li X, Liu Z, Jin P and Jiang J: Silibinin inhibits endometrial carcinoma via blocking pathways of STAT3 activation and SREBP1-mediated lipid accumulation. Life Sci. 217:70–80. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lin Q, Jiang Y, Zhou F and Zhang Y: Fatty acid synthase (FASN) inhibits the cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CESC) progression through the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Gene. 851:1470232023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Xu L, Li J, Ma J and Hasim A: Combined spatially resolved metabolomics and spatial transcriptomics reveal the mechanism of RACK1-mediated fatty acid synthesis. Mol Oncol. 19:1668–1686. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yi SA, Kim GW, Yoo J, Han JW and Kwon SH: HP1γ sensitizes cervical cancer cells to cisplatin through the suppression of UBE2L3. Int J Mol Sci. 21:59762020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang J, Chang X, Li C, Gao J, Guo Z, Zhuang H, Wang L, Huang Y, Wang W, Li C and He Q: DNA-PKcs-Driven YAP1 phosphorylation and nuclear translocation: A key regulator of ferroptosis in hyperglycemia-induced cardiac dysfunction in type 1 diabetes. Adv Sci (Weinh). 12:e24126982025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chang X, Zhou H, Hu J, Ge T, He K, Chen Y, Zou R and Fan X: Targeting mitochondria by lipid-selenium conjugate drug results in malate/fumarate exhaustion and induces mitophagy-mediated necroptosis suppression. Int J Biol Sci. 20:5793–5811. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Tang S and Chen L: The recent advancements of ferroptosis of gynecological cancer. Cancer Cell Int. 24:3512024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Tang S, Shen Y, Wei X, Shen Z, Lu W and Xu J: Olaparib synergizes with arsenic trioxide by promoting apoptosis and ferroptosis in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Cell Death Dis. 13:8262022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Samovich SN, Mikulska-Ruminska K, Dar HH, Tyurina YY, Tyurin VA, Souryavong AB, Kapralov AA, Amoscato AA, Beharier O, Karumanchi SA, et al: Strikingly high activity of 15-lipoxygenase towards di-polyunsaturated arachidonoyl/adrenoyl-phosphatidylethanolamines generates peroxidation signals of ferroptotic cell death. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 63:e2023147102024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Luo N, Zhang K, Li X, Hu Y and Guo L: Tanshinone IIA destabilizes SLC7A11 by regulating PIAS4-mediated SUMOylation of SLC7A11 through KDM1A, and promotes ferroptosis in breast cancer. J Adv Res. 69:313–327. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Glibetic N and Weichhaus M: Metabolic regulation of ferroptosis in breast cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 26:96862025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Liu Y, Wan Y, Jiang Y, Zhang L and Cheng W: GPX4: The hub of lipid oxidation, ferroptosis, disease and treatment. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 1878:1888902023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Liu M, Wu K and Wu Y: The emerging role of ferroptosis in female reproductive disorders. Biomed Pharmacother. 166:1154152023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Hu Q, Dai J, Zhang Z, Yu H, Zhang J, Zhu X, Qin Y, Zhang L and Zhang P: ASS1-Mediated reductive carboxylation of cytosolic glutamine confers ferroptosis resistance in cancer cells. Cancer Res. 83:1646–1665. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Jiang Y, Li J, Wang T, Gu X, Li X, Liu Z, Yue W and Li M: VIPAS39 confers ferroptosis resistance in epithelial ovarian cancer through exporting ACSL4. EBioMedicine. 114:1056462025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang Y, Hu M, Cao J, Wang F, Han JR, Wu TW, Li L, Yu J, Fan Y, Xie G, et al: ACSL4 and polyunsaturated lipids support metastatic extravasation and colonization. Cell. 188:412–429.e27. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sugi T, Katoh Y, Ikeda T, Seta D, Iwata T, Nishio H, Sugawara M, Kato D, Katoh K, Kawana K, et al: SCD1 inhibition enhances the effector functions of CD8(+) T cells via ACAT1-dependent reduction of esterified cholesterol. Cancer Sci. 115:48–58. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Li W, Xu Y, Zeng X, Tan J, Wang Y, Wu H, Li M and Yi C: Etiological relationship between lipid metabolism and endometrial carcinoma. Lipids Health Dis. 22:1162023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Guo F, Kong W, Li D, Zhao G, Anwar M, Xia F, Zhang Y, Ma C and Ma X: M2-type tumor-associated macrophages upregulated PD-L1 expression in cervical cancer via the PI3K/AKT pathway. Eur J Med Res. 29:3572024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Li X, Fu Y, Yang B, Guo E, Wu Y, Huang J, Zhang X, Xiao R, Li K, Wang B, et al: BRD4 inhibition by AZD5153 promotes antitumor immunity via depolarizing M2 macrophages. Front Immunol. 11:892020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Liao P, Wang W, Wang W, Kryczek I, Li X, Bian Y, Sell A, Wei S, Grove S, Johnson JK, et al: CD8(+) T?cells and fatty acids orchestrate tumor ferroptosis and immunity via ACSL4. Cancer Cell. 40:365–378.e6. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Luu M, Riester Z, Baldrich A, Reichardt N, Yuille S, Busetti A, Klein M, Wempe A, Leister H, Raifer H, et al: Microbial short-chain fatty acids modulate CD8(+) T cell responses and improve adoptive immunotherapy for cancer. Nat Commun. 12:40772021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ma S, Dahabieh MS, Mann TH, Zhao S, McDonald B, Song WS, Chung HK, Farsakoglu Y, Garcia-Rivera L, Hoffmann FA, et al: Nutrient-driven histone code determines exhausted CD8(+) T cell fates. Science. 387:eadj30202025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Launonen IM, Niemiec I, Hincapié-Otero M, Erkan EP, Junquera A, Afenteva D, Falco MM, Liang Z, Salko M, Chamchougia F, et al: Chemotherapy induces myeloid-driven spatially confined T?cell exhaustion in ovarian cancer. Cancer Cell. 42:2045–2063.e10. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Xia X, Wu H, Chen Y, Peng H and Wang S: Ferroptosis of T cell in inflammation and tumour immunity. Clin Transl Med. 15:e702532025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sun Y, Jing J, Xu H, Xu L, Hu H, Tang C, Liu S, Wei Q, Duan R, Guo J and Yang L: N-cadherin inhibitor creates a microenvironment that protect TILs from immune checkpoints and Treg cells. J Immunother Cancer. 9:e0021382021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Liu JY, Yao J, Liu JJ, He T, Wang FJ, Xie TY, Cui JX and Yang XD: LASTR is a novel prognostic biomarker and predicts response to cancer immunotherapy in gastric cancer. Front Oncol. 12:10202552022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang W, Green M, Choi JE, Gijón M, Kennedy PD, Johnson JK, Liao P, Lang X, Kryczek I, Sell A, et al: CD8(+) T cells regulate tumour ferroptosis during cancer immunotherapy. Nature. 569:270–274. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Correia AL, Guimaraes JC, Auf Der Maur P, De Silva D, Trefny MP, Okamoto R, Bruno S, Schmidt A, Mertz K, Volkmann K, et al: Hepatic stellate cells suppress NK cell-sustained breast cancer dormancy. Nature. 594:566–571. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Schaar B, Krishnan V, Tallapragada S, Chanana A and Dorigo O: Cell-based immunotherapy in gynecologic malignancies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 31:43–48. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang X, Zhu L, Deng Y, Zhang Q, Li R and Yang L: Screening of potential targets and small-molecule drugs related to lipid metabolism in ovarian cancer based on bioinformatics. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 733:1506732024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Mikhael S and Daoud G: Navigating metabolic challenges in ovarian cancer: Insights and innovations in drug repurposing. Cancer Med. 14:e706812025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhang W, Li Q and Yin R: Targeting WEE1 kinase in gynecological malignancies. Drug Des Devel Ther. 18:2449–2460. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ghanaatgar-Kasbi S, Khazaei M, Rastgar-Moghadam A, Ferns GA, Hassanian SM and Avan A: The therapeutic potential of MEK1/2 inhibitors in the treatment of gynecological cancers: Rational strategies and recent progress. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 20:417–428. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lai Y, Gao Y, Lin J, Liu F, Yang L, Zhou J, Xue Y, Li Y, Chang Z, Li J, et al: Dietary elaidic acid boosts tumoral antigen presentation and cancer immunity via ACSL5. Cell Metab. 36:822–838.e8. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lin F, Li X and Wang X, Sun H, Wang Z and Wang X: Stanniocalcin 1 promotes metastasis, lipid metabolism and cisplatin chemoresistance via the FOXC2/ITGB6 signaling axis in ovarian cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 41:1292022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Bauerschlag DO, Maass N, Leonhardt P, Verburg FA, Pecks U, Zeppernick F, Morgenroth A, Mottaghy FM, Tolba R, Meinhold-Heerlein I and Bräutigam K: Fatty acid synthase overexpression: Target for therapy and reversal of chemoresistance in ovarian cancer. J Transl Med. 13:1462015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Xu LX, Hao LJ, Ma JQ, Liu JK and Hasim A: SIRT3 promotes the invasion and metastasis of cervical cancer cells by regulating fatty acid synthase. Mol Cell Biochem. 464:11–20. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Han S, Dwivedi P, Mangrio FA, Dwivedi M, Khatik R, Cohn DE, Si T and Xu RX: Sustained release paclitaxel-loaded core-shell-structured solid lipid microparticles for intraperitoneal chemotherapy of ovarian cancer. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 47:957–967. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Liu J, Ning J, Wang Y, He X, Wang D, Zhou J and Wang J: FOXA2 sensitizes endometrial carcinoma to progestin-mediated conservative therapy by triggering PR transcriptional activation. Oncogene. 44:4145–4158. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Song J, Ruan X, Gu M, Wang L, Wang H and Mueck AO: Effect of orlistat or metformin in overweight and obese polycystic ovary syndrome patients with insulin resistance. Gynecol Endocrinol. 34:413–417. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Guo Z, Li Y, Guo Y, Zhang A, Huo X, Song Y, Li B, Tang Y, He T, Liu T, et al: Oleic acid activates TGFβ-Smad3 signaling to promote ovarian cancer progression. J Ovarian Res. 18:1802025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Gao A, Zou J, Zeng T, Qin M, Tang X, Yi T, Song G, Zhong J, Zeng Y, Zhou W, et al: IGF2BP3/ESM1/KLF10/BECN1 positive feedback loop: A novel therapeutic target in ovarian cancer via lipid metabolism reprogramming. Cell Death Dis. 16:3082025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Hafizz AMHA, Zin RRM, Aziz NHA, Kampan NC and Shafiee MN: Beyond lipid-lowering: Role of statins in endometrial cancer. Mol Biol Rep. 47:8199–8207. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ahmad A, Javed S and Kiran S: Statin as repurposed drug in ovarian cancer: A comprehensive review. Curr Pharm Des. 29:2116–2123. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Guo X, Liu Z, Li X, Zhou B and Chen J: Metabolic vulnerabilities in ovarian cancer decoding the nexus between nutrient adaptation and therapy resistance. J Adv Res. S2090-1232(26)00072-X. 2026, View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Scoles DR, Xu X, Wang H, Tran H, Taylor-Harding B, Li A and Karlan BY: Liver X receptor agonist inhibits proliferation of ovarian carcinoma cells stimulated by oxidized low density lipoprotein. Gynecol Oncol. 116:109–116. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Gibson DA, Collins F, Cousins FL, Esnal Zufiaurre A and Saunders PTK: The impact of 27-hydroxycholesterol on endometrial cancer proliferation. Endocr Relat Cancer. 25:381–391. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yang J and Stack MS: Lipid regulatory proteins as potential therapeutic targets for ovarian cancer in obese women. Cancers (Basel). 12:34692020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yao L, Chen S and Li W: Fatostatin inhibits the development of endometrial carcinoma in endometrial carcinoma cells and a xenograft model by targeting lipid metabolism. Arch Biochem Biophys. 684:1083272020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Razghonova Y, Mika A, Czapiewska M, Stanczak A, Zygowska P, Wydra DG, Sledzinski T and Abacjew-Chmylko A: Endometrial cancer is associated with altered metabolism and composition of fatty acids. Int J Mol Sci. 26:33222025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Barra F, Evangelisti G, Ferro Desideri L, Di Domenico S, Ferraioli D, Vellone VG, De Cian F and Ferrero S: Investigational PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors in development for endometrial cancer. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 28:131–142. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Huang TT, Lampert EJ, Coots C and Lee JM: Targeting the PI3K pathway and DNA damage response as a therapeutic strategy in ovarian cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 86:1020212020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yang X, Liu Z, Wang X, Tian W, Zhao T, Yang Q, Li W, Yang L, Yang H and Jia Y: Anti-cancer effects of nitazoxanide in epithelial ovarian cancer in-vitro and in-vivo. Chem Biol Interact. 400:1111762024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Han T, Chen T, Chen L, Li K, Xiang D, Dou L, Li H and Gu Y: HLF promotes ovarian cancer progression and chemoresistance via regulating Hippo signaling pathway. Cell Death Dis. 14:6062023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Teng K, Ma H, Gai P, Zhao X and Qi G: SPHK1 enhances olaparib resistance in ovarian cancer through the NFκB/NRF2/ferroptosis pathway. Cell Death Discov. 11:292025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Xuan Y, Wang H, Yung MM, Chen F, Chan WS, Chan YS, Tsui SK, Ngan HY, Chan KK and Chan DW: SCD1/FADS2 fatty acid desaturases equipoise lipid metabolic activity and redox-driven ferroptosis in ascites-derived ovarian cancer cells. Theranostics. 12:3534–3552. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Su M, Qin H, Shen J, An H and Cao Y: Beyond the tumor: Enhancing pancreatic cancer therapy through glutamine metabolism and innovative drug delivery. J Cell Commun Signal. 19:e700332025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Paddock MN, Field SJ and Cantley LC: Treating cancer with phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase inhibitors: Increasing efficacy and overcoming resistance. J Lipid Res. 60:747–752. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhao D, Wu L and Li Y: Targeting lipid metabolism to enhance cancer immunotherapy. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 1880:1894162025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhao Y, Li X, Xu S, Yang Y, Chen Q, Li J, Tian W, Zhang Q, Hou H and Li D: The anthraquinone derivative KA-4s reduces energy metabolism and enhances the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin. Mol Carcinog. 63:2090–2102. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kobayashi Y, Takeda T, Kunitomi H, Chiwaki F, Komatsu M, Nagai S, Nogami Y, Tsuji K, Masuda K, Ogiwara H, et al: Response predictive markers and synergistic agents for drug repositioning of statins in ovarian cancer. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 15:1242022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Guo L, He Y and Xin H: GDF15 promotes the resistance of epithelial ovarian cancer cells to gemcitabine via DHCR24-mediated cholesterol metabolism to elevate ABCB1 and ABCC1 levels in lipid rafts. Am J Cancer Res. 15:452–469. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhao T, Chen X, Wu J, Chen S, Gan Y, Liu C, Ha X, Wu Y, Zhou X, Wu Y and Wu X: YY1-induced USP43 drives ferroptosis suppression by FASN stabilization and subsequent activation of SLC7A11 in ovarian cancer. Cell Death Dis. 16:5892025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Cai H, Yan L, Liu N, Xu M and Cai H: IFI16 promotes cervical cancer progression by upregulating PD-L1 in immunomicroenvironment through STING-TBK1-NF-kB pathway. Biomed Pharmacother. 123:1097902020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ma X, Xiao L, Liu L, Ye L, Su P, Bi E, Wang Q, Yang M, Qian J and Yi Q: CD36-mediated ferroptosis dampens intratumoral CD8(+) T cell effector function and impairs their antitumor ability. Cell Metab. 33:1001–1012.e5. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Griffett K and Burris TP: Development of LXR inverse agonists to treat MAFLD, NASH, and other metabolic diseases. Front Med (Lausanne). 10:11024692023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Carbó JM, León TE, Font-Díaz J, De la Rosa JV, Castrillo A, Picard FR, Staudenraus D, Huber M, Cedó L, Escolà-Gil JC, et al: Pharmacologic activation of LXR alters the expression profile of tumor-associated macrophages and the abundance of regulatory T cells in the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Res. 81:968–985. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ribeiro CF, Rodrigues S, Bastos DC, Fanelli GN, Pakula H, Foiani M, Zadra G and Loda M: Blocking lipid synthesis induces DNA damage in prostate cancer and increases cell death caused by PARP inhibition. Sci Signal. 17:eadh19222024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kim JH, Rho JR and Choi JH: Marine sponge-derived gukulenin a sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to PARP inhibition via ferroptosis induction. Mar Drugs. 23:1382025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Berckmans Y, Ene HM, Ben-Meir K, Martinez-Conde A, Wouters R, Van den Ende B, Van Mechelen S, Monin R, Frechtel-Gerzi R, Gabay H, et al: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) induce homologous recombination deficiency in ovarian cancer cells, thus mitigating drug resistance. Front Oncol. 14:14028512024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Menendez JA, Cuyàs E, Encinar JA, Vander Steen T, Verdura S, Llop-Hernández À, López J, Serrano-Hervás E, Osuna S, Martin-Castillo BA and Lupu R: Fatty acid synthase (FASN) signalome: A molecular guide for precision oncology. Mol Oncol. 18:479–516. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Singh S, Karthikeyan C and Moorthy NSHN: Recent advances in the development of fatty acid synthase inhibitors as anticancer agents. Mini Rev Med Chem. 20:1820–1837. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Nuzzo PV, Rodrigues S, Ribeiro CF, Teixeira IF, Fanelli GN, Bleve S, Ravera F, Pakula H, Pederzoli F, Nanus DM and Loda M: Targeting cancer metabolism: Therapeutic potential of the fatty acid synthase (FASN) inhibitors. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 214:1049102025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Falchook G, Infante J, Arkenau HT, Patel MR, Dean E, Borazanci E, Brenner A, Cook N, Lopez J, Pant S, et al: First-in-human study of the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of first-in-class fatty acid synthase inhibitor TVB-2640 alone and with a taxane in advanced tumors. EClinicalMedicine. 34:1007972021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Franz A, Coscia F, Shen C, Charaoui L, Mann M and Sander C: Molecular response to PARP1 inhibition in ovarian cancer cells as determined by mass spectrometry based proteomics. J Ovarian Res. 14:1402021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Xia L, Ding S, Wang X, Zhang X, Zhu L, Zhang H and Li H: Advances in ovarian cancer treatment using a combination of statins with other drugs. Front Pharmacol. 13:10484842023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Jones HM, Fang Z, Sun W, Clark LH, Stine JE, Tran AQ, Sullivan SA, Gilliam TP, Zhou C and Bae-Jump VL: Atorvastatin exhibits anti-tumorigenic and anti-metastatic effects in ovarian cancer in vitro. Am J Cancer Res. 7:2478–2490. 2017.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Osataphan S, Patell R, Babuta M, Rosovsky RP, Hisada Y, Edmiston C, Elavalakanar P, Pfeffer MA, Bregar A, Ramos A, et al: The efficacy of rosuvastatin to reduce circulating tissue factor extracellular vesicles after ovarian cancer surgery. Blood Adv. 9:4472–4476. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yoon H and Lee S: Fatty acid metabolism in ovarian cancer: Therapeutic implications. Int J Mol Sci. 23:21702022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang X, Xie W, Zhao D, Liu M, Li W, Wang R, Cao L and Yu H: Molecular subtypes of ovarian cancer based on lipid metabolism and glycolysis reveals potential therapeutic targets. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 28:2532023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Niemi RJ, Braicu EI, Kulbe H, Koistinen KM, Sehouli J, Puistola U, M Enp JU and Hilvo M: Ovarian tumours of different histologic type and clinical stage induce similar changes in lipid metabolism. Br J Cancer. 119:847–854. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zeleznik OA, Irvin SR, Samimi G and Trabert B: The role of statins in the prevention of ovarian and endometrial cancers. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 16:191–197. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Feng WW, Zuppe HT and Kurokawa M: The role of CD36 in cancer progression and its value as a therapeutic target. Cells. 12:16052023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Li H, Luo F, Jiang X, Zhang W, Xiang T, Pan Q, Cai L, Zhao J, Weng D, Li Y, et al: CircITGB6 promotes ovarian cancer cisplatin resistance by resetting tumor-associated macrophage polarization toward the M2 phenotype. J Immunother Cancer. 10:e0040292022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ding L, Wang Q, Martincuks A, Kearns MJ, Jiang T, Lin Z, Cheng X, Qian C, Xie S, Kim HJ, et al: STING agonism overcomes STAT3-mediated immunosuppression and adaptive resistance to PARP inhibition in ovarian cancer. J Immunother Cancer. 11:e0056272023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |