International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.
International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.
Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.
Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.
Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.
Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.
International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.
Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.
Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.
Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.
An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.
Endometrial carcinoma comprises malignant tumors occurring in the female genital tract and is the third most common cause of gynecological cancer-related mortalities (1). The incidence and mortality rates have increased in recent years, with 66,200 new cases and 13,030 mortalities reported in 2023 in America (2). Despite advancements in diagnosis, targeted therapies and immunotherapies, the average 5-year survival rate of endometrial carcinoma is as low as 30%, especially for patients diagnosed in clinical phase III/IV, due to its rapid development and distant metastasis (3). Therefore, understanding the underlying molecular mechanism accounting for the carcinogenesis of endometrial carcinoma is essential for developing accurate targeted therapies.
Epigenetic modifications are involved in the carcinogenesis of numerous types of tumors, such as cervical (4) and hepatocellular (5) cancer. The N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification of RNA is a reversible epigenetic modification, including for DNA methylation and histone modifications (6–8). m6A-related proteins, referred to as ‘writer’, ‘eraser’ and ‘reader’ proteins, regulate pre-mRNA splicing, mRNA stability and the decay, localization, transport and translation of mRNA (9–12). The m6A ‘readers’, such as YTH N6-methyladenosine RNA binding protein C (YTHDC)1/2 and insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA binding protein (IGF2BP)1/2/3, identify methylated RNA and participate in the translation and degradation of downstream proteins (13). IGF2BPs are considered to exert a key role in biological processes such as embryogenesis, cell migration, proliferation and invasion (14,15). IGF2BP3 recruits nudix hydrolase 21 to regulate SPTBN1 m6A modifications, which drives ovarian cancer progression (16). IGF2BP3-methyltransferase like-14 complex regulates stearoyl-CoA desaturase mRNA m6A modifications, resulting in cervical cancer cell proliferation, metastasis and increased lipid metabolism (17). IGF2BP3-mediated m6A modification of the early growth response 1/PTEN axis regulates the malignant phenotypes of endometrial cancer stem cells (18).
IGF2BP3 enhances the mRNA stability of E2F transcription factor by interacting with long independently transcribed non-coding RNA 958 to promote endometrial carcinoma progression (19). Long non-coding RNA metastasis associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 and urothelial cancer associated 1 can be used as biomarkers for the prognosis of patients with glioblastoma (20). Circular RNAs (circRNAs/circs) are dysregulated in nearly all types of cancer and drive tumorigenesis through tumor-suppressive functions (21). IGF2BP2-modified circ-chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 7 promotes endometrial cancer progression by stabilizing platelet-derived growth factor receptor β and activating the Janus kinase/STAT signaling pathway (22).
CircEPB41L2 can bind PTBP1 and the E3 ubiquitin ligase TRIP12 to promote the ubiquitination and degradation of PTBP1, block the proliferation, invasion and metastasis of NSCLC (23), and act as a miRNA sponge involved in the tumorigenesis of colorectal cancer (24) and lung cancer (25).
However, the biological role of circEPB41L2 in gyneco-logical diseases, and whether IGF2BP3 can regulate circEPB41L2 expression has not been reported. The present study explored IGF2BP3 expression in endometrial carcinoma and identified the underlying mechanism and signal pathway, which can be further explored for targeted treatment in endometrial carcinoma.
A total of 25 endometrial carcinoma and adjacent paracancerous tissues were collected from the same female patients with endometrial carcinoma who underwent tumor resection at The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University (Guangzhou, China) between August 2024 and December 2025. Adjacent normal tissues were collected at least 1 cm away from the tumor margin. Patients who had received chemotherapy, radiotherapy or hormonal therapy were excluded. The age of the patients ranged 42–65 years, and the mean age was 55.3 years. All patients provided written informed consent. Clinical stages were classified according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2023 guidelines (26). The clinical parameters of the patients are summarized in Table I. The experimental procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University (Guangzhou, China; approval no. KY-2025-317).
Table I.Association of IGF2BP3 expression with clinicopathological features in 25 patients with endometrial carcinoma. |
The HEC-1A endometrial carcinoma cell line was obtained from American Type Culture Collection. HEC-1A cells were cultured at 37°C with 5% CO2 in DMEM (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution and 10% fetal calf serum (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.).
Gene set enrichment analysis software (version 4.3.2; http://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/index.jsp) was used to perform Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. Volcano plots displayed the differentially expressed genes or circ RNA, and the top 20 genes were further analyzed. Differentially expressed genes were screened with the threshold of |log2FC|>1 and false discovery rate (FDR)<0.05. Genes with log2FC>1 and FDR<0.05 were defined as upregulated genes, while genes with log2FC<-1 and FDR<0.05 were defined as downregulated genes.
IGF2BP3 gene expression profiles and matched clinical follow-up data were retrieved from the Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma (UCEC) cohort of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov) Patients were stratified into high- and low-IGF2BP3 groups according to the median expression level of IGF2BP3. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), and the log-rank test was used to compare survival differences between groups. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. A receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed and the area under the curve was calculated to evaluate the diagnostic performance of IGF2BP3. All statistical analyses were performed in R software (version 4.3.1; http://www.R-project.org/).
Endogenous IGF2BP3 (NM_006547.3) was stably knocked down using lentiviral vectors containing short hairpin RNA (shRNA/sh) constructs: shIGF2BP3#1, 5′-CCTTGAAAGTAGCCTATAT-3′; shIGF2BP3#2, 5′-GGTGAAACTTGAAGCTCAT-3′; and shIGF2BP3#3, 5′-CCAGACACCTGATGAGAAT-3′. The sequence of the shRNA control was as follows: 5′-CCTAAGGTTAAGTCGCCCT-3′. Validated pLKO.1-based shRNA and scramble control plasmids were purchased from MilliporeSigma and used at 1 µg/µl. Lentivirus was packaged in 293T cells (MilliporeSigma) using a third-generation system. In brief, 3 µg of plasmids (transfer:psPAX2:pMD2.G-=4:3:1) were transfected into 70–80% confluent 293T cells per 6-well plate via Lipofectamine 3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Viral supernatants were collected at 48–72 h, sterile-filtered (0.45 µm) and stored at −80°C. Target cells were transduced at an MOI of 2 for 24 h with 8 µg/ml polybrene. After medium renewal, antibiotic selection was performed at 48 h post-transduction to establish stable knockdown cell lines. All downstream experiments were conducted at 72 h after transduction.
Potential circRNA targets of IGF2BP3 were predicted using ENCORI (starBase v2.0; http://starbase.sysu.edu.cn/) database, which curates and integrates published cross-linking immunoprecipitation followed by high-throughput sequencing (CLIP-seq) datasets for RNA-binding protein and RNA interaction analysis (27). Briefly, IGF2BP3 binding peaks we searched for and candidate circRNAs with statistically significant binding signals were retained. The default significance cut-off threshold of the ENCORI pipeline was applied, with FDR<0.05.
HEC-1A cells transfected with sh-negative control (sh-NC) or sh-IGF2BP3 were seeded in 96-well plates (5,000 cells per well). After 24, 48, 72 and 96 h 0 µl CCK-8 solution (APExBIO Technology LLC) was added to each well. The cells were subsequently incubated for an additional 2 h at 37°C. The absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 450 nm.
A Transwell chamber (cat. no. 3422; Corning, Inc.) was used to detect cell migration. A total of 3×105 cells suspended in serum-free medium were added to the upper chamber and 700 µl DMEM with 10% FBS was added to the lower chamber. For migration assays, uncoated upper chambers were applied. For invasion assays, upper chambers were pre-coated with Matrigel matrix (Corning, Inc.) and gelled at 37°C. After incubation at 37°C for 24 h, the upper chambers were rinsed with PBS and fixed in 100% methanol for 15 min at room temperature. Next, cells left on the surface of the chamber were carefully wiped off with cotton swabs. Crystal violet staining was performed for 10 min at room temperature, and then the lower chambers were rinsed again with PBS. Cells in three random fields were imaged under a bright-field microscope (magnification, ×40) and the numbers of cells that had passed through the cell membrane were counted using ImageJ (version 1.54u8; National Institutes of Health).
Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent (cat. no. 15596026; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Ribosomal RNA depletion was performed using a Ribo-Zero rRNA Removal Kit (cat. no. MRZH11124; Illumina, Inc.). For quality verification, the RNA concentration and purity were determined using a Nanodrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), and RNA integrity was assessed using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Inc.). Only samples with an optical density (OD)260/280 of 1.8–2.2, OD260/230 of 2.0–2.4 and RNA integrity number ≥7.0 were used for subsequent analysis.
Whole-transcriptome libraries were constructed using a TruSeq Stranded Total RNA Library Prep Kit (cat. no. 20020596; Illumina, Inc.). The final library concentration was accurately quantified with a Qubit 4.0 Fluorometer (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), and libraries were normalized to a loading concentration of 1.5 nM. Sequencing was performed on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform (Illumina, Inc.) with the paired-end 150-bp sequencing mode.
Raw sequencing reads were quality-trimmed and filtered using Trimmomatic v0.39 (www.usadellab.org/cms/page=trimmomatic). Clean reads were aligned to the human reference genome using HISAT2 v2.2.1 (https://daehwankimlab.github.io/hisat2/). Transcript expression levels (transcripts per million) were quantified using StringTie v2.2.1(https://ccb.jhu.edu/software/stringtie/). Differential expression analysis was conducted using DESeq2 v1.52.0 (R v4.6.1), with thresholds of |log2FC|≥1 and adjusted P<0.05. All software was used with default parameters as documented in the official developer manuals.
Total RNA was extracted from cells or tissue using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) in accordance with the manufacturer's protocol. The PrimeScript™ RT reagent kit (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) was used to reverse transcribe RNA into cDNA. The reaction program was set as 42°C for 2 min (gDNA elimination), 37°C for 15 min (reverse transcription) and 85°C for 5 sec (heat inactivation). The cDNA was preserved at −20°C. For qPCR, the reaction system was constructed according to the protocol of the SYBR Premix Ex Taq™ II kit (Takara Bio, Inc.). The expression levels of RNA were determined using the Bio-Rad CFX96 real-time PCR system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). The human housekeeping gene GAPDH was used as the internal control. The sequences of the primers utilized in the present study were as follows: IGF2BP3 forward, 5′-CCGTATCCAAGCAGAAACCA-3′ and reverse, 5′-AATCGACTTCTCAGCAGCCC-3′; GAPDH forward, 5′-AAGGCTGTGGGCAAGG-3′ and reverse, 5′-TGGAGGAGTGGGTGTCG-3′; circ-EPB41L2 forward, 5′-ACCAAGGAAGTGCAGACCAA-3′ and reverse, 5′-TCACTTCAGACACAGAGCCT-3′; circ-WDPCP forward, 5′-AACGATGATGCTTGGCCTTG-3′ and reverse, 5′-TCTGAGATGAGCTTCCCCAC-3′; and circ-PH20 forward, 5′-GAACCGACTTCTCCCCTTGT-3′ and reverse, 5′-AGGCCTAGCATTACCCACAA-3′. The thermocycling conditions were as follows: One cycle at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 60 sec. Melting curves were generated to confirm specific amplification. Relative gene expression was quantified by 2−ΔΔCq method (28), normalized to GAPDH.
After PBS washing, cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (cat. no. R0010; Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.) supplemented with 1% PMSF (cat. no. P0100; Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.) on ice for 30 min. Lysates were centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 15 min at 4°C and protein concentrations were quantified using a BCA assay kit (cat. no. MA0082; Dalian Meilun Biotechnology Co., Ltd.). Proteins (30 mg/lane) were separated by SDS-PAGE (cat. no. P0015L; Beyotime Biotechnology) and transferred to PVDF membranes (Roche Diagnostics). Membranes were blocked with quick block buffer (cat. no. P0023B; Beyotime Biotechnology) at room temperature for 30 min and incubated with primary antibodies IGF2BP1 (1:1,500; cat. no. ab184305; Abcam) IGF2BP3 (1:2,000; cat. no. ab225697; Abcam) and GAPDH (1:1,000; cat. no. MA5-15738; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) overnight at 4°C. After incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody IgG (H+L) (1:1,000; cat. no. A0352; Beyotime Biotechnology) for 1 h at room temperature, protein bands were visualized using ECL reagent (cat. no. MA0186; Dalian Meilun Biotechnology Co., Ltd.).
MeRIP analysis was performed according to MeRIP m6A kit (cat. no. C11051-1; Guangzhou RiboBio Co., Ltd). Total RNA was extracted and chemically fragmented at 70°C for 5 min to produce 100–200 nucleotide RNA fragments. For each IP reaction, 100 µg fragmented RNA was incubated with the kit-supplied anti-m6A antibody and Protein A/G magnetic beads at 4°C overnight; IgG from the kit served as the negative control. The bead-RNA-antibody complexes were washed three times with pre-cooled 1X IP buffer. Immunoprecipitated RNA was eluted, purified and subjected to RT-qPCR to evaluate m6A enrichment.
All experiments were performed in triplicate with consistent and reproducible results. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS 16.0 software (SPSS, Inc.), and data are presented as the mean ± SD. Comparisons between two groups were performed using t-tests. Matched samples were analyzed using a paired-samples t-test. For independent samples, the homogeneity of variance test was performed first to select the appropriate test. If the variance was homogeneous (P>0.05), independent-samples t-test was used for group comparison. One-way ANOVA was performed to analyze differences among multiple groups, with Tukey's test adopted for post hoc pairwise comparisons. The associations between IGF2BP3 expression and clinicopathological features were analyzed using Fisher's exact test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
First, the expression levels of the m6A methylation-related reader proteins in 35 normal and 546 endometrial carcinoma tissues from TCGA database were compared and analyzed (Fig. 1A). IGF2BP1, IGF2BP3 and RNA binding motif protein 15 (RBM15) were revealed to be upregulated, while YTHDC2 was downregulated in endometrial carcinoma. Upregulated expression of IGF2BP1, IGF2BP3 and RBM15, but downregulated expression of YTHDC2 was associated with poorer survival (Fig. 1B). To further verify the expression of the aforementioned genes, qPCR was performed for 5 pairs of endometrial carcinoma tissues and corresponding paracancerous tissues. The results indicated that only IGF2BP1 and IGF2BP3 were expressed at significantly higher levels in endometrial cancer tissues (Fig. 1C). Subsequently, 25 clinical samples were used to further detect the expression levels of IGF2BP1 and IGF2BP3 by RT-qPCR and western blotting. AlthoughIGF2BP3 and IGF2BP1 expression was significantly upregulated in endometrial carcinoma tissues compared with paracancerous tissues, only the mRNA and protein expression of IGF2BP3 was consistently increased (Fig. 1D and E). Therefore, IGF2BP3 was selected as the target gene to perform further research.
To further explore the association between IGF2BP3 expression and patient prognosis, the overall survival (OS) and The DFS and OS rates of patients with endometrial carcinoma were evaluated via Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Patients with high IGF2BP3 expression exhibited significantly shorter OS and DFS times (Fig. 2A and B). Furthermore, the potential diagnostic value of IGF2BP3 expression in endometrial carcinoma was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic curve. As shown in Fig. 2C, the area under the curve for IGF2BP3 was 0.76 with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 65%.
To determine the biological role of IGF2BP3 in vitro, HEC-1A endometrial carcinoma cells were transfected with sh-IGF2BP3 or sh-NC. The knockdown efficiency of IGF2BP3 was verified by RT-qPCR (Fig. 3A). sh-IGF2BP3-1 and sh-IGF2BP3-3 significantly reduced the mRNA level of IGF2BP3, while sh-IGF2BP3-2 showed no notable knockdown effect Flow cytometry was used to evaluate lentiviral infection efficiency by detecting EGFP fluorescence (Fig. 3B). The EGFP-positive rates of all three groups exceeded 93%, indicating satisfactory lentivirus transduction for subsequent functional experiments. Western blot analysis demonstrated that IGF2BP3 protein expression was significantly decreased after transfection with sh-IGF2BP3-1. (Fig. 3C). Therefore, sh-IGF2BP3-1 and sh-IGF2BP3-3 were used to detect functional changes in HEC-1A cells. The results indicated that downregulation of IGF2BP3 significantly decreased cell viability (Fig. 3D). Transwell migration and invasion assays demonstrated that knockdown of IGF2BP3 markedly suppressed cell migration and invasion compared with the sh-NC group (Fig. 3E).
CircRNAs are considered to serve a key role in the clinical diagnosis, treatment and prognosis evaluation of tumors due to their high stability and tissue specificity (29). RNA-sequencing analysis of endometrial carcinoma tissue and paracancerous tissue was performed. A total of 168 circRNAs were upregulated and 273 circRNAs were downregulated in tumor tissue (Fig. 4A). KEGG and GO analysis indicated that the significantly altered genes were involved in ‘regulation of transcription’ and ‘cellular response to DNA damage stimulus’ and associated with the ‘TGF-β signaling pathway’ and the ‘Wnt signaling pathway’ (Fig. 4B). Furthermore, the downregulation of IGF2BP3 resulted in dysregulated gene expression, including upregulation of 178 genes and downregulation of 232 genes, in transfected endometrial carcinoma cells (Fig. 4C). The significantly altered terms and pathways included ‘cellular heat acclimation’, the ‘transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine kinase signaling pathway’, the ‘Wnt signaling pathway’ and ‘MAPK, PI3K-Akt pathway’ (Fig. 4D). These results suggested that circRNAs were abnormally expressed in endometrial carcinoma and may be regulated by IGF2BP3.
To determine the specific targeted circRNA which corresponded to IGF2BP3, screening of candidate circRNAs regulated by IGF2BP3 was performed using the CLIP-seq database according to the following criteria: i) The trend of circRNA expression was consistent with that of IGF2BP3, namely, the expression of circRNA in endometrial cancer was dysregulated; ii) the expression of circRNA was downregulated after interference with IGF2BP3 expression; and iii) the circRNA simultaneously had m6A and IGF2BP3 binding sites. Based on the aforementioned criteria, three circRNAs (circ-EPB41L2, circ-WD repeat containing planar cell polarity effector and circ-PH20) were predicted to interact with IGF2BP3 (Fig. 5A). Pairs supported by ≥2 independent CLIP-seq experiments (ClipExpNum ≥2) were considered for subsequent analysis.
Among them, circ-EPB41L2 was prioritized for further investigation as it exhibited the most consistent IGF2BP3 binding in CLIP-seq datasets and the most marked upregulation in endometrial cancer tissues relative to paired paracancerous control tissues (Fig. 5B). Functional validation in HEC-1-A cells suggested that only circ-EPB41L2 expression was significantly reduced following IGF2BP3 knockdown (Fig. 5C), whereas the expression of the other two candidates was not statistically significantly altered.
An m6A RIP (Fig. 5D) assay verified that circ-EPB41L2 can be dynamically modulated by m6A modification supporting a potential regulatory axis involving m6A modification and IGF2BP3 binding. Collectively, these findings identified circ-EPB41L2 as a key target for future mechanistic studies.
The reversible m6A modification is considered to be the most abundant RNA modification, which serves a key role in regulating RNA splicing, stability and translation via writer, eraser and reader proteins (30). Inhibition of m6A read protein YTHDF2 triggers proteotoxic cell death, which affects breast cancer progression (31). YTHDF1 associated with high-altitude hypoxia adaptation, modulates NSCLC progression and cisplatin sensitivity by regulating the translation of cell cycle genes and the Keap1/Nrf2/AKR1C1 axis (32). RNA-binding proteins have a variety of functions, of which the post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression is a key factor involved in carcinogenesis and therapeutic responses (33). Increased IGF2BP3 expression typically implies the malignant transformation of tissues (34). IGF2BP3 stabilizes PDPN mRNA to facilitate invadopodia formation and extracellular matrix degradation, promoting tumorigenesis and invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma (35), the role of IGF2BP3 in endometrial carcinoma has rarely been explored.
In the present study, the expression levels of major m6A methylation-related ‘reader’ proteins were compared and analyzed using TCGA, which suggested that IGF2BP1, IGF2BP3 and RBM15 were upregulated in endometrial carcinoma. High expression levels of the upregulated proteins were associated with worse prognosis. Subsequently, the expression levels of the IGF2BP1 and IGF2BP3 were analyzed by RT-qPCR and western blotting. Lastly, IGF2BP3 was revealed to be the only gene that exhibited consistent expression changes at the mRNA and protein level and was related to the prognosis of patients. Although multivariate survival analysis was not performed to analyze the association between IGF2BP3 expression and clinicopathological parameters, IGF2BP3 was still selected as the target gene to perform further research.
IGF2BP3 is associated with the carcinogenesis and progression of numerous types of cancer. Chen et al (36) examined TCGA data and revealed that IGF2BP3 was predominantly upregulated across 18 different types of tumors. Consistent with this study, the present study revealed that IGF2BP3 was upregulated in patients with endometrial carcinoma. IGF2BP3-stabilized SIX homeobox 4 promotes the proliferation, migration, invasion and tube formation of ovarian cancer cells (37). IGF2BP3 interacts with MYCN and facilitates neuroblastoma cell proliferation (38). IGF2BP3, as a reader protein, prevents high mobility group box 1 mRNA decay in bladder cancer (39). In the present study, knockdown of IGF2BP3 expression inhibited cell proliferation and invasion in vitro. These results implied the role of IGF2BP3 in endometrial carcinoma development. Therefore, the mechanism of IGF2BP3 in endometrial carcinoma should be further explored.
circRNAs are involved in proliferation, metastasis, apoptosis, metabolism and drug resistance in urological cancer (40). circRNAs can not only combine with microRNAs to compete with endogenous RNA in colon cancer but also bind to certain proteins (41). circ-nuclear factor of activated T cells 3 promotes the proliferation of gastric cancer cells by binding to IGF2BP3 and restricting its ubiquitination to enhance cyclin D1 mRNA stability (42). circ-EPB41L2 serves as a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in lung adenocarcinoma (43). However, how IGF2BP3 influences the expression of circ-EPB41L2 has not been explored. In the present study, a CLIP-seq database was used to predict genes that IGF2BP3 may bind to. circ-EPB41L2 expression was revealed to be positively associated with IGF2BP3 expression. Although IGF2BP3-RIP-qPCR, RNA pull-down assays, m6A site mutation experiments, actinomycin D stability assays and reciprocal rescue experiments were not performed to demonstrate the direct association between IGF2BP3 and circ-EPB41L2, MeRIP demonstrated that IGF2BP3 effectively bound to circ-EPB41L2. In the future, Sanger sequencing and subcellular localization analysis should be performed to further confirm IGF2BP3 regulation of circ-EPB41L2 in an m6A-dependent manner. Furthermore, it should be explored whether circ-EPB41L2 regulates ferroptosis in cancer progression, similar to long non-coding RNAs (44).
The present study demonstrated that IGF2BP3 was a tumorigenic RNA-binding protein that may mediate the stabilization of circ-EPB41L2. However, the detailed mechanisms of IGF2BP3 and circ-EPB41L2 regulators need to be investigated further in the future.
The present study has several limitations. First, the patient sample size needs to be expanded. Second, m6A methylation site prediction and functional verification should be performed at multiple levels to confirm the IGF2BP3-dependent epigenetic regulatory mechanism of circ-EPB41L2. Finally, additional cell and animal studies should be performed to further clarify the roles of IGF2BP3 and circ-EPB41L2 in endometrial carcinoma.
In summary, the present study provided in vitro evidence demonstrating that IGF2BP3 was a reader protein that could modify circ-EPB41L2, contributing to the tumorigenesis of endometrial cancer. IGF2BP3 may therefore be used as a target for the therapy of endometrial carcinoma.
Not applicable.
The present study was supported by the Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou (grant no. 202102010134).
The high-throughput sequencing data generated in the present study may be found in the Gene Expression Omnibus database under accession number GSE333959 or at the following URL: (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE333959). The other data generated in the present study may be requested from the corresponding author.
LL participated in performing the experimental work and drafted the manuscript. XF performed the statistical analyses, prepared the figures and critically read and corrected the manuscript. YZ collected the specimens and performed the experimental work. SS participated in conceiving the study and received the financial support. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript. LL, XF, YZ and SS confirm the authenticity of all the raw data.
Ethics approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University (Guangzhou, China; approval no. KY-2025-317). The procedures used in the present study adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Not applicable.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
|
Liang B, Tan J, Li J, Wang X, Li G, Li H, Li T and Gao H: Epidemiology, molecular typing, microbiome-immune interactions and treatment strategies of endometrial cancer: A review. Front Immunol. 16:15956382025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS and Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 73:17–48. 2023.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Dane C and Bakir S: The effect of myometrial invasion on prognostic factors and survival analysis in endometrial carcinoma. Afr Health Sci. 19:3235–3241. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Liu H, Ma H, Li Y and Zhao H: Advances in epigenetic modifications and cervical cancer research. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 1878:1888942023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Nagaraju GP, Dariya B, Kasa P, Peela S and El-Rayes BF: Epigenetics in hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Cancer Biol. 86:622–632. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Koch A, Joosten SC, Feng Z, de Ruijter TC, Draht MX, Melotte V, Smits KM, Veeck J, Herman JG, Van Neste L, et al: Analysis of DNA methylation in cancer: Location revisited. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 15:459–466. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kraiczy J, Nayak KM, Howell KJ, Ross A, Forbester J, Salvestrini C, Mustata R, Perkins S, Andersson-Rolf A, Leenen E, et al: DNA methylation defines regional identity of human intestinal epithelial organoids and undergoes dynamic changes during development. Gut. 68:49–61. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Roundtree IA, Evans ME, Pan T and He C: Dynamic RNA modifications in gene expression regulation. Cell. 169:1187–1200. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang X, Zhao BS, Roundtree IA, Lu Z, Han D, Ma H, Weng X, Chen K, Shi H and He C: N(6)-methyladenosine modulates messenger RNA translation efficiency. Cell. 161:1388–1399. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lin S, Choe J, Du P, Triboulet R and Gregory RI: The m(6)A methyltransferase METTL3 promotes translation in human cancer cells. Mol Cell. 62:335–345. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
He L, Li H, Wu A, Peng Y, Shu G and Yin G: Functions of N6-methyladenosine and its role in cancer. Mol Cancer. 18:1762019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Huang H, Weng H and Chen J: The biogenesis and precise control of RNA m(6)A methylation. Trends Genet. 36:44–52. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Jiang X, Liu B, Nie Z, Duan L, Xiong Q, Jin Z, Yang C and Chen Y: The role of m6A modification in the biological functions and diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 6:742021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Bell JL, Wachter K, Muhleck B, Pazaitis N, Kohn M, Lederer M and Huttelmaier S: Insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding proteins (IGF2BPs): Post-transcriptional drivers of cancer progression? Cell Mol Life Sci. 70:2657–2675. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Degrauwe N, Suva ML, Janiszewska M, Riggi N and Stamenkovic I: IMPs: An RNA-binding protein family that provides a link between stem cell maintenance in normal development and cancer. Genes Dev. 30:2459–2474. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Luo X, Xie L, Ma X, Chen N and Xu J, Jiang X, Liu X, Yang Y, Liu T, Yi P and Xu J: IGF2BP3 recruits NUDT21 to regulate SPTBN1 alternative polyadenylation and drive ovarian cancer progression. Commun Biol. 8:6802025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Han C, Hu C, Liu T, Sun Y, Hu F, He Y, Zhang J, Chen J, Ding J, Fan J, et al: IGF2BP3 enhances lipid metabolism in cervical cancer by upregulating the expression of SCD. Cell Death Dis. 15:1382024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang B, Wang Y, Wang W, Wang Z, Zhang Y, Pan X, Wen X, Leng H, Guo J and Ma XX: WTAP/IGF2BP3 mediated m6A modification of the EGR1/PTEN axis regulates the malignant phenotypes of endometrial cancer stem cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 43:2042024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang C, Kong F, Ma J, Miao J, Su P, Yang H, Li Q and Ma X: IGF2BP3 enhances the mRNA stability of E2F3 by interacting with LINC00958 to promote endometrial carcinoma progression. Cell Death Discov. 8:2792022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Hooshmandi S, Jangholi E, Heidarian A, Dehghani M, Ghassemi A, Heidary A, Rezvanimehr A, Sadeghi E, Ghodsi SM, Hoseinian M, et al: The role of MALAT1 and UCA1 long non-codingRNAs on the prognosis of patients with glioblastoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Precis Med Sci. 14:66–74. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Conn VM, Chinnaiyan AM and Conn SJ: Circular RNA in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 24:597–613. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Shi R, Zhao R, Shen Y, Wei S, Zhang T, Zhang J, Shu W, Cheng S, Teng H and Wang H: IGF2BP2-modified circular RNA circCHD7 promotes endometrial cancer progression via stabilizing PDGFRB and activating JAK/STAT signaling pathway. Cancer Gene Ther. 31:1221–1236. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang Y, Wang Y, Wu C, Ji Y, Hou P, Wu X, Li Z, Li M, Chu S, Ning Q, et al: circEPB41L2 blocks the progression and metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer by promoting TRIP12-triggered PTBP1 ubiquitylation. Cell Death Discov. 10:722024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Jiang Z, Hou Z, Li L, Liu W, Yu Z and Chen S: Exosomal circEPB41L2 serves as a sponge for miR-21-5p and miR-942-5p to suppress colorectal cancer progression by regulating the PTEN/AKT signalling pathway. Eur J Clin Invest. 51:e135812021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhang SJ, Ma J, Wu JC, Hao ZZ, Zhang YN and Zhang YJ: CircRNA EPB41L2 inhibits tumorigenicity of lung adenocarcinoma through regulating CDH4 by miR-211-5p. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 25:31502021.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Gaffney D, Suneja G, Weil C and Creutzberg C: International federation of gynecology and obstetrics endometrial 2023 is better for radiation oncology patients. Pract Radiat Oncol. 14:574–581. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Li JH, Liu S, Zhou H, Qu LH and Yang JH: starBase v2.0: Decoding miRNA-ceRNA, miRNA-ncRNA and protein-RNA interaction networks from large-scale CLIP-Seq data. Nucleic Acids Res. 42:D92–D97. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Patop IL, Wüst S and Kadener S: Past, present, and future of circRNAs. EMBO J. 38:e1008362019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Fu Y, Dominissini D, Rechavi G and He C: Gene expression regulation mediated through reversible m⁶A RNA methylation. Nat Rev Genet. 15:293–306. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Einstein JM, Perelis M, Chaim IA, Meena JK, Nussbacher JK, Tankka AT, Yee BA, Li H, Madrigal AA, Neill NJ, et al: Inhibition of YTHDF2 triggers proteotoxic cell death in MYC-driven breast cancer. Mol Cell. 81:3048–3064. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Shi Y, Fan S, Wu M, Zuo Z, Li X, Jiang L, Shen Q, Xu P, Zeng L, Zhou Y, et al: YTHDF1 links hypoxia adaptation and non-small cell lung cancer progression. Nat Commun. 10:48922019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
van Kouwenhove M, Kedde M and Agami R: MicroRNA regulation by RNA-binding proteins and its implications for cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 11:644–656. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Mancarella C and Scotlandi K: IGF2BP3 from physiology to cancer: Novel discoveries, unsolved issues, and future perspectives. Front Cell Dev Biol. 7:3632019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lin CAOY, Chen ST, Jeng YM, Yeh CC, Chou HY, Deng YT, Chang CC and Kuo MYP: Insulin-like growth factor II mRNA-binding protein 3 expression promotes tumor formation and invasion and predicts poor prognosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med. 40:699–705. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chen P, Xu J, Cui Z, Wu S, Xie T and Zhang X: Multi-omics analysis of N6-methyladenosine reader IGF2BP3 as a promising biomarker in pan-cancer. Front Immunol. 14:10716752023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Han J and Hu X: IGF2BP3-stabilized SIX4 promotes the proliferation, migration, invasion and tube formation of ovarian cancer cells. Mol Med Rep. 26:2322022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhu K, Gao T, Wang Z, Zhang L, Tan K and Lv Z: RNA N6-methyladenosine reader IGF2BP3 interacts with MYCN and facilitates neuroblastoma cell proliferation. Cell Death Discov. 9:1512023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lv L, Wei Q, Zhang J, Dong Y, Shan Z, Chang N, Zhao Y, Bian P and Yi Q: IGF2BP3 prevent HMGB1 mRNA decay in bladder cancer and development. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 29:392024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhang ZH, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Zheng SF, Feng T, Tian X, Abudurexiti M, Wang ZD, Zhu WK, Su JQ, et al: The function and mechanisms of action of circular RNAs in Urologic Cancer. Mol Cancer. 22:612023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Gu Z, Wu W, Lu J and Shen J: Construction of circular RNA-based competing endogenous RNA network in colon cancer. Precis Med Sci. 13:52–62. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Yang F, Ma Q, Huang B, Wang X, Pan X, Yu T, Ran L, Jiang S, Li H, Chen Y, et al: CircNFATC3 promotes the proliferation of gastric cancer through binding to IGF2BP3 and restricting its ubiquitination to enhance CCND1 mRNA stability. J Transl Med. 21:4022023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Li Z, Ma G and Pan Y: Five circRNAs serve as potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in lung adenocarcinoma. Clin Lab. 67:10–7754. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Mo Q, Qiu Y, Liang Y, Wei Q, Fan X and Pang W: Exploring long Noncoding RNAs and ferroptosis in cancer progression. Life Conflux. 1:e1282025. View Article : Google Scholar |