Chemoembolization of rat liver metastasis with microspheres and gemcitabine followed by evaluation of tumor cell load by chemiluminescence

  • Authors:
    • Matthias H. Seelig
    • Meike Leible
    • Jan Sänger
    • Martin R. Berger
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: May 1, 2004     https://doi.org/10.3892/or.11.5.1107
  • Pages: 1107-1113
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

An orthotopic, isogenic rat model was used to determine the potential of chemoembolization (CHE) for reducing the tumor cell load of a diffusely metastatic liver. Seven days after injecting CC531-lac-Z cells intraportally to male WAG/Rij rats, tumor positive animals were treated by injection into the hepatic artery with solvent (n=17), degradable starch microspheres (DSM, 30 mg/kg; n=16), DSM plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU, dosages: 90, 60, and 40 mg/kg) or DSM plus gemcitabine (Gem, dosages: 100, 80, 50, and 10 mg/kg). After 3 more weeks the experiment was terminated, the livers were weighted and the number of CC531-lac-Z cells per liver was determined. Injection of DSM reduced the tumor cell load by 21% (T/C%=79), the combination with 5-FU caused a stimulation of growth at 40 mg/kg (T/C%=291; n=10), but effected dose-dependent reductions in tumor cell number at 60 mg/kg (T/C%=86; n=16), and 90 mg/kg (T/C=19; n=17). None of these effects was significantly different from controls. The combination of DSM plus Gem was toxic at the highest dose (100 mg/kg), but well tolerated and highly effective at 80 mg/kg (T/C%= 16; n=12), 50 mg/kg (T/C%=9; n=12), and 10 mg/kg (T/C%=26; n=14). These results were significantly different from controls (p<0.05), respectively. In summary, the comparison of CHE with 5-FU or Gem shows that the efficacy of Gem in reducing the hepatic tumor cell load was significantly higher and its therapeutic ratio was greater than that of 5-FU.

Related Articles

Journal Cover

May 2004
Volume 11 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1021-335X
Online ISSN:1791-2431

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Seelig MH, Leible M, Sänger J and Berger MR: Chemoembolization of rat liver metastasis with microspheres and gemcitabine followed by evaluation of tumor cell load by chemiluminescence. Oncol Rep 11: 1107-1113, 2004
APA
Seelig, M.H., Leible, M., Sänger, J., & Berger, M.R. (2004). Chemoembolization of rat liver metastasis with microspheres and gemcitabine followed by evaluation of tumor cell load by chemiluminescence. Oncology Reports, 11, 1107-1113. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.11.5.1107
MLA
Seelig, M. H., Leible, M., Sänger, J., Berger, M. R."Chemoembolization of rat liver metastasis with microspheres and gemcitabine followed by evaluation of tumor cell load by chemiluminescence". Oncology Reports 11.5 (2004): 1107-1113.
Chicago
Seelig, M. H., Leible, M., Sänger, J., Berger, M. R."Chemoembolization of rat liver metastasis with microspheres and gemcitabine followed by evaluation of tumor cell load by chemiluminescence". Oncology Reports 11, no. 5 (2004): 1107-1113. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.11.5.1107