Differences in proportion and dynamics of recipient hematopoiesis following hematopoietic cell transplantation in CML and IMF

  • Authors:
    • Udo Siebolts
    • Jürgen Thiele
    • Thomas Zander
    • Markus Ditschkowski
    • Dietrich W. Beelen
    • Nicolaus Kröger
    • Boris Fehse
    • Claudia Wickenhauser
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: January 1, 2008     https://doi.org/10.3892/or.19.1.287
  • Pages: 287-292
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Since decades myeloablation followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation offered the only opportunity to cure leukemia patients and only recently the development of STI571 created a further alternative in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). While among all leukemias this transplantation regimen had the best outcome in CML, trials with reduced intensity conditioning regimens (RIC) were rather humbling and recurrence of the neoplastic clone occurred frequently. However, the same therapy in patients with idiopathic myelofibrosis (IMF) resulted in a more favorable outcome. Therefore, long-term mixed chimerism (mCh) was determined on bone marrow (BM) biopsies derived from five IMF patients and from eight CML patients of the pre STI era following sex-mismatched transplantation. All patients presented lasting hematologic remission and were matched concerning age, sex and appearance of GvHD. Analysis of late transplant period (day +100) revealed a concentration of host cells within the CD34+ precursor cell compartment in both diseases. However, in IMF BM biopsies only up to 8% recipient CD34+ precursors but in CML biopsies up to 26% recipient CD34+ precursors were detected. Taken into account that in CML up to 10% of the host BM CD34+ precursors bear the BCR-ABL translocation our data suggest that the neoplastic CD34+ progenitor cell population might dispose of better strategies to escape immune surveillance in CML than in IMF.

Related Articles

Journal Cover

January 2008
Volume 19 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 1021-335X
Online ISSN:1791-2431

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Siebolts U, Thiele J, Zander T, Ditschkowski M, Beelen DW, Kröger N, Fehse B and Wickenhauser C: Differences in proportion and dynamics of recipient hematopoiesis following hematopoietic cell transplantation in CML and IMF. Oncol Rep 19: 287-292, 2008
APA
Siebolts, U., Thiele, J., Zander, T., Ditschkowski, M., Beelen, D.W., Kröger, N. ... Wickenhauser, C. (2008). Differences in proportion and dynamics of recipient hematopoiesis following hematopoietic cell transplantation in CML and IMF. Oncology Reports, 19, 287-292. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.19.1.287
MLA
Siebolts, U., Thiele, J., Zander, T., Ditschkowski, M., Beelen, D. W., Kröger, N., Fehse, B., Wickenhauser, C."Differences in proportion and dynamics of recipient hematopoiesis following hematopoietic cell transplantation in CML and IMF". Oncology Reports 19.1 (2008): 287-292.
Chicago
Siebolts, U., Thiele, J., Zander, T., Ditschkowski, M., Beelen, D. W., Kröger, N., Fehse, B., Wickenhauser, C."Differences in proportion and dynamics of recipient hematopoiesis following hematopoietic cell transplantation in CML and IMF". Oncology Reports 19, no. 1 (2008): 287-292. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.19.1.287