MRS study of meningeal hemangiopericytoma and edema: A comparison with meningothelial meningioma

  • Authors:
    • Valeria Righi
    • Vitaliano Tugnoli
    • Adele Mucci
    • Antonella Bacci
    • Sergio Bonora
    • Luisa Schenetti
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: July 19, 2012     https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2012.1919
  • Pages: 1461-1467
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Intracranial hemangiopericytomas (HPCs) are rare tumors and their radiological appearance resembles that of meningiomas, especially meningothelial meningiomas. To increase the knowledge on the biochemical composition of this type of tumor for better diagnosis and prognosis, we performed a molecular study using ex vivo high resolution magic angle spinning (HR-MAS) magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) perfomed on HPC and peritumoral edematous tissues. Moreover, to help in the discrimination between HPC and meningothelial meningioma we compared the ex vivo HR-MAS spectra of samples from one patient with HPC and 5 patients affected by meningothelial meningioma. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in vivo localized single voxel 1H-MRS was also performed on the same patients prior to surgery and the in vivo and ex vivo MRS spectra were compared. We observed the presence of OH-butyrate, together with glucose in HPC and a low amount of N-acetylaspartate in the edema, that may reflect neuronal alteration responsible for associated epilepsy. Many differences between HPC and meningothelial meningioma were identified. The relative ratios of myo-inositol, glucose and gluthatione with respect to glutamate are higher in HPC compared to meningioma; whereas the relative ratios of creatine, glutamine, alanine, glycine and choline-containing compounds with respect to glutamate are lower in HPC compared to meningioma. These data will be useful to improve the interpretation of in vivo MRS spectra resulting in a more accurate diagnosis of these rare tumors.

Introduction

Hemangiopericytomas (HPCs) are rare, highly cellular and vascular tumors derived from pericytes of Zimmerman, which are contractile smooth-muscle cells surrounding the endothelium of the capillaries, and are ubiquitous in all types of mesenchymal tissue. HPCs may arise in the soft tissues anywhere in the body (1,2) and the most common sites are head and neck, lower extremities and retroperitoneum. HPCs affecting the central nervous system are considered malignant (3,4), existing in low-grade and high-grade form with predictably aggressive clinical behavior, including high rates of recurrence and distant metastases (5). Macroscopically, HPC is a solid tumor that is well demarcated from the adjacent brain tissue (3,6). The tumor is typically treated by complete microsurgical removal, followed by local irradiation of the tumor bed. The majority of tumors can be removed in a seemingly complete manner. However, local recurrences are almost ine- vitable in the long run and tumor metastasis eventually occurs in over 60% of patients after 15 years (3,6,7). Intracranial HPCs, classified under the heading of non-meningothelial mesenchymal tumors (8), are difficult to distinguish from meningiomas based on location, clinical presentation (911) and brain imaging (5,1214). Due to their more aggressive behavior, intracranial HPCs require different management and a correct diagnosis is critical (1517). However, data from two studies (18,19) suggest that the discrimination between HPC and meningiomas seems to be possible by using in vivo MR spectroscopy (MRS) and the authors hypothesized that the discrimination can be obtained based on the much higher levels of myo-inositol (Myo) in the HPCs. Moderately increased concentrations of Myo in the in vivo MR spectra of four HPCs have been also reported by Fountas et al (10).

Additional studies have reported on the in vivo 1H-MRS spectra from HPC, but they are not as informative as high resolution magic angle spinning (HR-MAS) MRS about the complete metabolic profile of this type of tumor. The choline containing compounds (ChoCC) peak is dominant in these in vivo spectra (20,21).

HPCs are rare tumors, therefore performing a significant study on a large amount of samples in order to improve the diagnosis remains a challenge, however it is important to know more about the biochemical composition of this tumor. With this aim, we studied the metabolic profile of HPC using ex vivo HR-MAS MRS, which allows the whole analysis of intact tissue with minimal sample preparation (2224). A comparison between the in vivo and ex vivo MRS spectra was performed with the goal to better understand HPC and edema tissues. Moreover, the difference between the HPC and meningothelial meningioma will be highlighted.

Materials and methods

Sample

Informed consent before spectroscopic examination was obtained from the patient. MRI and in vivo localized single voxel 1H-MRS were performed with a 3 Tesla whole-body scanner (General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI) following the routine standard clinical protocol previously described (25). MR imaging was performed with T2-weighted fast spin-echo (FSE) sequences (TR, 4200 ms; TE, 93 ms; NEX, 2; 24-cm field of view; 512×512 matrix; 4-mm sections), fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences (TR, 9002 ms; TE, 91 ms; NEX, 2; 24-cm field of view; 320×320 matrix; 4-mm sections) in the axial plane, and T1-weighted spin-echo (SE) sequences (TR, 560 ms; TE, 18 ms; NEX, 2; 24-cm field of view; 384×224 matrix; 4-mm sections) in the sagittal and coronal planes before administration of a contrast agent and coronal and axial planes after administration of a contrast agent. For choosing a voxel for spectroscopy, homogeneous regions on the T2-weighted image were selected carefully excluding cystic, necrotic, or hemorrhagic region. The volume of interest (VOI) size ranged from 1.2 to 8 cm3. 1H-MR spectra were acquired before administration of the contrast agent with a point-resolved spectroscopy sequence (PRESS) for localization, with TR 2000 ms and TE 35 ms, 128 acquisitions, and a 3-pulse chemical shift selection suppression (CHESS) sequence to provide water suppression. We used automated optimization of gradient shimming, transmitter pulse power, and water suppression.

MRI revealed a left frontobasal perisellar lesion. The lesion is an extra-axial round mass with homogeneous intense enhancement after contrast administration and it is associated with severe cerebral edema in underlying brain parenchyma and midline shifts. According to Chernov et al (26) the extension of perilesional edema, evaluated by T2-weighted MR image, was graded as severe. The patient received mannitol as the only anti-edema drug. After MRI and in vivo MRS the patient underwent surgery and one sample was obtained from the lesion and a second sample was obtained from the edema area. A small portion of tumor and edema, were used for HR-MAS MRS analysis. A portion of tumoral specimen was used for routine histopathology and revealed a grade II WHO HPC (27). During surgery, resected tissue was sent for histological analysis, and remainder of the tissue was immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until MRS analyses. The manipulation time for sample storing under nitrogen is around 1 min.

Ex vivo HR-MAS MRS

Before MRS examination, each sample was flushed with D2O to improve the homogeneity, the water suppression, and to add deuterium as a nucleus for the lock system. The sample was introduced in a MAS zirconia rotor (4 mm OD) maintained on ice, fitted with a 50-μl cylindrical insert to increase sample homogeneity, and then transferred into the probe cooled to 4°C. Total time for sample preparation prior to NMR analysis was only a few minutes.

1H and 13C HR-MAS spectra were recorded with a Bruker Avance 400 (Bruker BioSpin, Karlsruhe, Germany) spectrometer operating at a frequency of 400.13 and 100.61 MHz, respectively. The instrument was equipped with a 1H,13C HR-MAS probe. Experiments were performed at a temperature of 4°C controlled by a Bruker cooling unit.

Samples were spun at 4000 Hz and three different types of one-dimensional (1D) proton spectra were acquired by using the sequences implemented in the Bruker software: i) a composite pulse sequence (zgcppr) (28) with 1.5 s water presaturation during the relaxation delay, 8 kHz spectral width, 32k data points, 32 scans, ii) a water-suppressed spinecho Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) sequence (cpmgpr) (29) with 1.5 s water presaturation during the relaxation delay, 1 ms echo time (τ) and 360 ms total spin-spin relaxation delay (2nτ), 8 kHz spectral width, 32k data points, 256 scans and iii) a sequence for diffusion measurements based on stimulated echo and bipolar-gradient pulses (ledbpgp2s1d) (30) with Δ 200 ms, eddy current delay Te 5 ms, δ 2×2 ms, sine-shaped gradient with 32 G/cm followed by a 200-μs delay for gradient recovery, 8 kHz spectral width, 8k data points, 256 scans. Two-dimensional (2D) 1H,1H-correlation spectroscopy (COSY) (31,32) spectra were acquired using a standard pulse sequence (cosygpprqf) and 0.5 s water presaturation during relaxation delay, 8 kHz spectral width, 4k data points, 32 scans per increment, 256 increments. 2D 1H,1H-total correlation spectroscopy (TOCSY) (33,34) spectra were acquired using a standard pulse sequence (mlevphpr) and 1 s water presaturation during relaxation delay, 100 ms mixing time (spin-lock), 4 kHz spectral width, 4k data points, 32 scans per increment, 128 increments. 2D 1H,13C-heteronuclear single quantum coherence (HSQC) (35) spectra were acquired using an echo-anti-echo phase-sensitive standard pulse sequence (hsqcetgp) and 0.5 s relaxation delay, 1.725 ms evolution time, 4 kHz spectral width in f2, 4k data points, 128 scans per increment, 17 kHz spectral width in f1, 256 increments.

Relative quantification of metabolites

In each spectrum, relative ratios of all of the quantificable metabolites were calculated by measuring the area of individual metabolites signal with respect to the area of Glu signal at 2.34 ppm. The intensity of the Glu remained consistent in HPC and meningioma spectra as noted by the visual inspection of the 1H spectra of all tissue samples. Metabolite ratios relative to Glu are expressed as mean ± SD (standard deviation).

Results

Typical axial T2-weighted MR images of HPC, edema, axial T1-weighted and coronal T1-weighted MR images after contrast administration are shown in Fig. 1. The HPC demonstrate a large abnormal mass with severe edema. T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging characteristics, and contrast uptake appear compatible with both meningiomas and HPCs. The tumor demonstrates heterogeneous intensity being both hypo- and isointense to white matter and iso- and hyperintense to gray matter. Small vascular elements are evident in the lesion (Fig. 1A). Significant edema in underlying brain parenchyma is present (Fig. 1B). The lesion shows intense contrast enhancement (Fig. 1C) and dural attachment (Fig. 1D). MRI shows a sharply demarcated extra-assial tumor with dural attachment in left para/suprasellar region and contrast enhancement on T1-weighted images after gadolinium. The lesion is isointense with grey matter on T2-weighted images with small hypointense areas due to vessels. Significant edema in underlying brain parenchyma is present.

Fig. 2 shows the ex vivo 1D 1H HR-MAS MR spectra of HPC lesion. The spectrum (Fig. 2A) was obtained using a conventional 1H spectrum with water presaturation, and it represents the global biochemical composition of lesion. The second spectrum (Fig. 2B), acquired with a spin-echo sequence, displays signals deriving from small metabolites. After the analysis several metabolites are identified: 1,2-propanediol (1,2-propanendiol is an exogenous compound used as solvent in pharmaceutical preparations containing some water-soluble ingredients), β-hydroxybutyrate (OH-But), lactate (Lac), alanine (Ala), acetate (Ac), glutamine plus glutamate (Glx), glutamate (Glu), glutamine (Gln), glutathione (GSH), creatine (Cr), ChoCC, taurine (Tau), mannitol (Man), Myo, α- and β-glucose (α- and β-Glc). The assignment of 1,2-propanediol is based on the analysis of 1D 1H, and selected 2D (COSY, TOCSY and HSQC) NMR spectra, where we highlight the H-H correlations of 1,2-propanediol. The signals are at 1.14 ppm (d) CH3, 3.55/3.44 ppm CH2 and 3.87 ppm CH. The spectrum (Fig. 2C) was acquired with a diffusion edited sequence and shows the contribution from lipids and macromolecules. The complete metabolic assignments were confirmed using two dimensional COSY, TOCSY and HSQC spectra. All of the experiments permit clarification of the metabolite pattern of the lesion and the same experiments were also used to characterize the metabolic profile of edema (Fig. 3).

The results were compared with data from the literature (36) and, when possible, with the experimental spectra in the Human Metabolome Database (37) to assign the different metabolites.

The same small metabolites were found in both tumor and edema, but in different amounts. For instance, the amount of Cr and Myo is lower in the lesion compared to in the edema, whereas levels of α- and β-Glc together with Tau seem to be higher in the lesion. Furthermore, we observed a different Glu/Gln ratio in the two types of tissues, and that OH-But and GSH were present only in HPC. Different profiles were observed for macromolecules (MM) and lipids: HPC diffusion spectrum (Fig. 2C) is characterized by the presence of lipids (manly triglycerides, probably as lipid bodies) and MM signals, whereas that of the edema (Fig. 3C) shows signals mainly due to MM.

A direct comparison between in vivo (TE, 35) and conventional ex vivo spectra of the lesion after a suitable broadening process (Fig. 4, panel 1) shows that there is good agreement between the two profiles. The main difference between in vivo and ex vivo spectra is found in the Man signals due to the different magnetic fields used. At 3T, the field for in vivo MRS, the signals due to Man appear as a broad signal centred at 3.8 ppm, whereas at 9.4T, the field for ex vivo MRS spectra, Man signals are distributed in a region between 3.6 and 4.0 ppm and structured at low line broadening. Man is an exogenous metabolite used to reduce brain pressure produced by the tumoral mass in patients.

The ex vivo HR-MAS spectrum of the edema (Fig. 4, panel 2B) shows more Lac and MM and less N-acetylacetylaspartate (NAA) than the in vivo spectrum (Fig. 4, panel 2A). The Lac signal is higher in the ex vivo than in the in vivo spectrum of the edema, but this is likely not significant, since the Lac signal is always observed in ex vivo spectra due to the unavoidable period of ischemia during the biopsy procedure (38). The signal usually assigned to NAA in the in vivo spectrum at 2.01 ppm in this case receives the contributions of Glu and Gln as can be seen from the HR-MAS ex vivo spectrum. The decrease in NAA and the increase in acetate (Ac) in the 1H ex vivo HR-MAS spectrum of the edema are notable (Fig. 3B), suggesting the degradation of NAA to Ac and aspartate (39).

Comparing the HR-MAS spectra of HPC and meningioma (Fig. 5), we observe many differences between the two tumors. The phosphocholine (PC)/choline (Cho) ratio appears to be different comparing meningioma to HPC (Fig. 5, panel 1), but in our opinion this aspect needs further investigation. In fact, we observed a high variability of PC/Cho in our meningioma set. It is to be noted that HR-MAS MRS allows the detection of Ala in HPC, which has been reported to be absent (19,20). This is probably due to the higher sensitivity of HR-MAS MRS with respect to in vivo MRS. Nevertheless, both techniques show that the Ala content is lower in HPC than in meningioma. The diffusion edited spectra of HPC and meningioma are shown in Fig. 5, panel 2. The comparison shows a very similar profile with slightly higher amounts of lipids in HPC compared to meningioma.

Discussion

We applied ex vivo HR-MAS MRS to assess the metabolic status of HPC and edema. Several differences in the metabolic profile of HPC and edema can be detected.

The resonance deriving from the OH-But was identified in the lesion spectrum (Fig. 2B). It has been shown that elevated ketone bodies can target brain tumors while enhancing the metabolic efficiency of normal neurons glia. Moreover, the ketones bodies are toxic to some tumor cells and they might restrict availability of glutamine (4042). In our case, the pre- sence of OH-But together with Glc in the lesion could suggest the bioenergetic transition from normal to neoplastic brain. In contrast to a normal brain, which oxidizes Glc as well as ketone bodies for energy, malignant brain tumors are largely dependent on Glc for energy. OH-But is also reported to prolong cell survival time and to inhibit cerebral edema by improving energy metabolism in the hypoxia, anoxia and global cerebral ischemia models. The cerebroprotective effect of OH-But was examined in rats with permanent (p)-occlusion and transient (t)-occlusion of middle cerebral artery (MCA) (43).

The low intensity of the NAA signal (singlet at 2.01 ppm; Fig. 3B) is evident in peritumoral edema tissue analyzed in ex vivo, in agreement with the decrease of NAA in peritumoral lesion reported in in vivo spectra MRS (25,44). The NAA is belived to be a marker of neuronal integrity (45), and its decrease in the edema may reflect neuronal alteration responsible for associated epilepsy. Our HR-MAS data obtained from biopsy samples confirm a strong neuronal alteration and the patient showed neurological disorders, including seizure epilepsy. Regional brain reduction of NAA levels measured by MRS is a well recognized marker of neuronal or axonal loss in many neurologic disorders, including traumatic brain injury, ischemic stroke, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions (46,47).

Another important difference between HPC and edema is the Cr amount, which was very low in HPC and higher in the edema. This is in agreement with our previous in vivo MRS study of peritumoral brain edema where an energy-linked metabolic alteration was associated with injury to the myelin sheath (25).

The biochemical profile of HPC can be compared with that of meningioma, the molecular characterization of which, by ex vivo HR-MAS MRS, has already been reported (48,49). The more suitable comparison is between HPC and meningothelial meningioma, which is the most common meningioma. We used the Glu signal at 2.34 ppm as a reference for the analysis because this signal does not overlap with others and it is easy to integrate. Moreover, we did not observe appreciable differences among the meningothelial meningioma (grade I) and HPC samples.

We observed that the relative ratios of Myo, Glc and GSH with respect to Glu are higher in HPC compared to meningioma; and vice versa the relative ratios of Cr, Gln, Ala, Gly and ChoCC with respect to Glu are lower in HPC compared to meningioma (Table I).

Table I

Relative ratios metabolite/Glu from CPMG HR-MAS experiments in HPC and MN (meningothelial meningioma).

Table I

Relative ratios metabolite/Glu from CPMG HR-MAS experiments in HPC and MN (meningothelial meningioma).

MetabolitesHPC (1 sample)MN (5 samples)
Ala0.31.01±0.42
Gln0.40.77±0.34
Cr0.30.59±0.38
ChoCC1.843.39±1.51
Gly0.140.93±0.31
Myo0.150.09±0.08
Glc0.47-
GSH0.24-

[i] MN values are expressed as mean ± SD (standard deviation).

Hypotaurine (HTau) is detected only in meningioma, whereas OH-But is present only in HPC. Overall, these data are consistent with published studies (1921). It is difficult to quantify the Tau content in HPC due to overlapping signal from α-, β-Glc.

In conclusion, HR-MAS spectra permit the characterization of the metabolic profiles of HPC and peritumoral edema tissue. The presence of OH-But together with Glc in the lesion could suggest the bioenergetic transition from normal to neoplastic brain. The variations in the NAA amount in the edema area may reflect neuronal alteration responsible for associated epilepsy. Our HR-MAS data performed on biopsy confirmed a strong neuronal alteration, and the patient showed neurological disorders including seizure epilepsy.

We identified many differences between HPC and meningioma. The relative ratios of Myo, Glc, and GSH with respect to Glu are higher in HPC compared to meningioma; and, vice versa, the relative ratios of Cr, Gln, Ala, Gly and ChoCC with respect to Glu are lower in HPC compared to meningioma. Ala was detected by HR-MAS MRS in HPC but not in vivo MRS.

The ex vivo HR-MAS allows for a comprehensive metabolic characterization of HPC tissues. We hope that identification of key metabolites would provide a basis for studies aimed at better understanding of the biochemical processes of this tumor. These data obtained from a large number of samples would be useful to improve the interpretation of in vivo MRS spectra and allow for better diagnosis and prognosis.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant of MUR ex 60% to V.T. and from a L'Oréal-Unesco Fellowship to Valeria Righi.

Abbreviations:

Ala

alanine

Ac

acetate

CPMG

Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill

ChoCC

choline containing compounds

Cr

creatine

HPCs

hemangiopericytomas

HR-MAS

high resolution magic angle spinning

MRS

magnetic resonance spectroscopy

MRI

magnetic resonance imaging

1D

one-dimensional

2D

two-dimensional

COSY

correlation spectroscopy

TOCSY

total correlation spectroscopy

HSQC

heteronuclear single quantum coherence

OH-But

β-hydroxybutyrate

Lac

lactate

Glx

glutamine plus glutamate

Glu

glutamate

Gln

glutamine

GSH

glutathione

Tau

taurine

Man

mannitol

Myo

myo-inositol

NAA

N-acetylaspartate

α- and β-Glc

α- and β-glucose

MM

macromolecules

HTau

hypotaurine

PC

phosphocholine

References

1 

Espat NJ, Lewis JJ, Leung D, et al: Conventional hemangiopericytoma: modern analysis of outcome. Cancer. 95:1746–1751. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Koch M, Nielsen GP and Yoon SS: Malignant tumors of blood vessels: angiosarcomas, hemangioendotheliomas, and hemangiopericytomas. J Surg Oncol. 97:321–329. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Mena H, Ribas JL, Pezeshkpour GH, Cowan DN and Parisi JE: Hemangiopericytoma of the central nervous system: a review of 94 cases. Hum Pathol. 22:84–91. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Scheithauer BW, Fuller GN and VandenBerg SR: The 2007 WHO classification of tumors of the nervous system: controversies in surgical neuropathology. Brain Pathol. 18:307–316. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Wu W, Shi JX, Cheng HL, et al: Hemangiopericytomas in the central nervous system. J Clin Neurosci. 16:519–523. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Jääskeläinen J, Louis DN, Paulus W and Haltia MJ: Haemangiopericytoma. Pathology and Genetics of the Nervous System Tumors. Kleihues P and Cavenee WK: WHO Classification of Tumors. IARC Press; Lyon: pp. 190–192. 2000

7 

Kim JH, Jung HW, Kim YS, et al: Meningeal hemangiopericytomas: long-term outcome and biological behavior. Surg Neurol. 59:47–54. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Kleihaus P, Louis DN, Burger PC, et al: The WHO classification of tumors of the nervous system. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 61:215–229. 2002.

9 

Galanis E, Buckner JC, Scheithauer BW, et al: Management of recurrent meningeal hemangiopericytoma. Cancer. 82:1915–1920. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Fountas KN, Kapsalaki E, Kassam M, et al: Management of intracranial meningeal hemangiopericytomas: outcome and experience. Neurosurg Rev. 29:145–153. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Sundaram C, Uppin SG, Uppin MS, et al: A clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study of central nervous system hemangiopericytomas. J Clin Neurosci. 17:469–472. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Akiyama M, Sakai H, Onoue H, Miyazaki Y and Abe T: Imaging intracranial hemangiopericytomas: study of seven cases. Neuroradiology. 46:194–197. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Sibtain NA, Butt S and Connor SE: Imaging features of central nervous system hemangiopericytomas. Eur Radiol. 17:1685–1693. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Tashjian VS, Khanlou N, Vinters HV, et al: Hemangiopericytoma of the cerebello pontine angle: a case report and review of the literature. Surg Neurol. 72:290–295. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Soyuer S, Chang EL, Selek U, et al: Intracranial meningeal hemangiopericytoma: the role of radiotherapy: report of 29 cases and review of the literature. Cancer. 100:1491–1497. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Olson C, Yen CP, Schlesinger D and Sheehan J: Radiosurgery for intracranial hemangiopericytoma: outcomes after initial and repeat Gamma Knife surgery. J Neurosurgery. 112:133–139. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Rutkowski MJ, Sughrue ME, Kane AJ, et al: Predictors of mortality following treatment of intracranial hemangiopericytoma. Neurosurgery. 113:340–351. 2010.

18 

Barba I, Moreno A, Martinez-Pérez I, et al: Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of brain hemangiopericytomas: high myoinositol concentrations and discrimination from meningiomas. J Neurosurg. 94:55–60. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Fortuniak J, Jaskólski DJ, Stefańczyk L, Zawirski M and Gajewicz W: Magnetic resonance imaging of rare intracranial neoplasms - role of the in vivo 1 h spectroscopy in the radiological differential diagnostics. Cen Eur Neurosurg. 71:181–188. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Cho YD, Choi GH, Lee SP and Kim JK: (1)H-MRS metabolic patterns for distinguishing between meningiomas and other brain tumors. Magn Reson Imaging. 21:663–672. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Hattingen E, Pilatus U, Good C, et al: An unusual intraventricular haemangiopericytoma: MRI and spectroscopy. Neuroradiology. 45:386–389. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Beckonert O, Coen M, Keun HC, et al: High-resolution magic-angle-spinning NMR spectroscopy for metabolic profiling of intact tissue. Nat Protoc. 5:1019–1032. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

DeFeo EM and Cheng LL: Charactrizing human cancer metabolomics by ex vivo 1HRMAS MRS. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 9:381–391. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Moestue S, Sitter B, Bathen TF, Tessem MB and Gribbestad IS: HR MAS MR spectroscopy in metabolic characterization of cancer. Curr Top Med Chem. 11:2–26. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Ricci R, Bacci A, Tugnoli V, et al: Metabolic findings on 3T 1H-MR spectroscopy in peritumoral brain edema. Am J Neuroradiol. 28:1287–1291. 2007.

26 

Chernov MF, Kubo O, Hayashi M, et al: Proton MRS of the peritumoral brain. J Neurol Sci. 228:137–142. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, et al: The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol. 114:97–109. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Bax A: A spatially selective composite 90° radiofrequency pulse. J Magn Reson. 65:142–145. 1985.

29 

Meiboom S and Gill D: Modified spin-echo method for measuring nuclear relaxation time. Rev Sci Instrum. 20:688–691. 1958. View Article : Google Scholar

30 

Wu D, Chen A and Johnson CS Jr: An improved diffusion ordered spectroscopy experiment incorporating bipolar gradient pulses. Magn Reson Series A. 115:260–264. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Jeener J: Pulse pair techniques in high resolution NMR. Ampere International Summer School; Basko Polje: 1971

32 

Aue WP, Bartholdi E and Ernst RR: Two-dimensional spectroscopy. Application to nuclear magnetic resonance. J Chem Phys. 64:2229–2246. 1976. View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Braunschweiler L and Ernst RR: Coherence transfer by isotropic mixing: application to proton correlation spectroscopy. J Magn Reson. 53:521–528. 1983.

34 

Bax A and Davis DG: MLEV-17-based two-dimensional homonuclear magnetization transfer spectroscopy. J Magn Res. 65:355–360. 1985.

35 

Bodenhausen G and Ruben DJ: Natural abundance nitrogen-15 NMR by enhanced eteronuclear spectroscopy. Chem Phys Lett. 69:185–189. 1980. View Article : Google Scholar

36 

Fan TMW: Metabolite profiling by one- and two-dimensional NMR analysis of complex mixtures. Prog Nuc Mag Res Spec. 28:161–219. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Wishart DS, Tzur D, Knox C, et al: HMDB: the human metabolome database. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:D521–D526. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Opstad KS, Wright AJ, Bell BA, et al: Correlations between in vivo 1H MRS and ex vivo 1H HRMAS metabolite measurements in adult human gliomas. J Magn Reson Imag. 31:289–297. 2010.

39 

Harting I, Jost G, Hacke N and Hartmann M: Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of brain tumours. Nervenarzt. 76:403–417. 2005.PubMed/NCBI

40 

Kashiwaya Y, Pawlosky R, Markis W, et al: A ketone ester diet increases brain malonyl-CoA and uncoupling proteins 4 and 5 while decreasing food intake in the normal Wistar Rat. J Biol Chem. 285:25950–25956. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Yudkoff M, Daikhin Y, Melø TM, et al: The ketogenic diet and brain metabolism of amino acids: relationship to the anticonvulsant effect. Annul Rev Nutr. 27:415–430. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Skinner R, Trujillo A, Ma X and Beierle EA: Ketone bodies inhibit the viability of human neuroblastoma cells. J Pediatr Surg. 44:212–216. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Suzuki M, Suzuki M, Kitamura Y, et al: β-hydroxybutyrate, a cerebral function improving agent, protects rat brain against ischemic damage caused by permanent and transient focal cerebral ischemia. Jpn J Pharmacol. 89:36–43. 2002.

44 

Chernov MF, Kawamata T, Amano K, et al: Possible role of single-voxel (1)H-MRS in differential diagnosis of suprasellar tumors. J Neurooncol. 91:191–198. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Demougeot C, Garnier P, Mossiat C, et al: N-Acetylaspartate, a marker of both cellular dysfunction and neuronal loss: its relevance to studies of acute brain injury. J Neurochem. 77:408–415. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar

46 

Moffett JR, Ross B, Arun P, et al: N-Acetylaspartate in the CNS: from neurodiagnostics to neurobiology. Prog Neurobiol. 81:89–131. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

47 

Rigotti DJ, Inglese M and Gonen O: Whole-brain N-acetylaspartate as a surrogate marker of neuronal damage in diffuse neurologic disorders. Am J Neuroradiol. 28:1843–1849. 2007.

48 

Tugnoli V, Schenetti L, Mucci A, et al: Ex vivo HR-MAS MRS of human meningiomas: a comparison with in vivo 1H MR spectra. Int J Mol Med. 18:859–869. 2006.

49 

Monleon D, Morales JM, Gonzalez-Darder J, et al: Benign and atypical meningioma metabolic signatures by high-resolution magic-angle spinning molecular profiling. J Proteome Res. 7:2882–2888. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

October 2012
Volume 28 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1021-335X
Online ISSN:1791-2431

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Righi V, Tugnoli V, Mucci A, Bacci A, Bonora S and Schenetti L: MRS study of meningeal hemangiopericytoma and edema: A comparison with meningothelial meningioma. Oncol Rep 28: 1461-1467, 2012
APA
Righi, V., Tugnoli, V., Mucci, A., Bacci, A., Bonora, S., & Schenetti, L. (2012). MRS study of meningeal hemangiopericytoma and edema: A comparison with meningothelial meningioma. Oncology Reports, 28, 1461-1467. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2012.1919
MLA
Righi, V., Tugnoli, V., Mucci, A., Bacci, A., Bonora, S., Schenetti, L."MRS study of meningeal hemangiopericytoma and edema: A comparison with meningothelial meningioma". Oncology Reports 28.4 (2012): 1461-1467.
Chicago
Righi, V., Tugnoli, V., Mucci, A., Bacci, A., Bonora, S., Schenetti, L."MRS study of meningeal hemangiopericytoma and edema: A comparison with meningothelial meningioma". Oncology Reports 28, no. 4 (2012): 1461-1467. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2012.1919